A brief video showing how to properly install the wastegate servo, setting the right values in the GPC 3 table and how to cycle the servo motor.
Пікірлер: 12
@savagecub5 ай бұрын
I’m gonna need a LOT more help than this video !
@willwagner72222 жыл бұрын
I like it ! Keep up the great work and videos!
@stolaircraftsuyanto97282 жыл бұрын
renewable technology
@kamikadze2422 жыл бұрын
Hey, why you are using electric servo for wastegate ? why not oldschool with pressure?
@EdgePerformanceNorway2 жыл бұрын
Because servo gives us way better control
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
Instead of elaborate patchwork on overpriced rotax piston engines, seriously consider doing a turbofan jet engine instead at about 15kg weight, about 1/3 the size of the Williams EJ22 prototype engine or 1/10 the size of the FJ33. Surprisingly a turbofan can be fuel efficient and it's so light for the power, you have natural double engine benefit, on front prop noise maker, it's quiet, powerful and fast and runs on JetA fuel. Forget all your intuition about jet engines, realize that a 15kg engine isn't inherently expensive to make and realize that the world idstance record of 40000km at 500km/h without refueling belongs to the off the shelf Williams FJ44-4 engine. Could you do that with a rotax... stop and really think about it. patchwork on a rotax has no significant future if any. but a small turbofan engine for light planes from 250-700kg, that's a revolution. Or total market dominance.
@WattsUpDev2 жыл бұрын
Pay for the development or just observe and be quiet 🤫
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
@@WattsUpDev hush, sheeple. venture capital is an option is they need money for it but they might not.
@Captndarty2 жыл бұрын
Where in Christ’s name are you going to mount a turbo fan on a light sport aircraft? Ain’t going on the nose and it ain’t going underneath the wing unless you mount two which will negate the whole purpose of your loquacious ramblings
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
@@Captndarty hehe I think Jesus would place two turbofans in the coolest place they could go and that's where private jets place them, on the tail. Maybe top rear wing like hondajet but rear looks cool and has the nicest noise profile and blade incursion in case of catastrophic failure. Not going on the nose is the very point my status quo sheepish friend. The front prop config is very old school and awful for visibility and noise and complicates layout and atrocious in a fire. Not going on the nose is exactly why my ramblings are so intelligent. The twin engine config that comes naturally with rear placement and the smaller size of engine of twin config lends itself to lower production cost, also gives you the ocean crossing capability and general redundancy that people pay dearly for. And you get that for free with small turbofans.
@WattsUpDev2 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen They will pursue Venture Capital for “their” goals not yours. Like I said unless your willing to find your suggestions and Dreams don’t offer them it’s unprofessional and childish.