European conquest of America - Summary on a Map

[@enzo91821]

I really liked that the unknown territories were in black, it gives a better context.

[@nietaiden4436]

Is there a joke I'm missing

[@emilianocastillo4187]

@@grantcaldwell1582 or Eu4

[@sneedle252]

@@grantcaldwell1582 Like a Starcraft map :) It's a great idea for videos about exploration. Would love to see fog of war used in map videos for battles/wars.

[@alexanderboshnakov7242]

I knew there was going to br that comment, true.

[@rodomann]

Fog of war: On

[@davidgreenwitch]

Fun fact. The city of New Amstetdam was defended by a big wall. But the British attacked from the sea. When they conquered the city and renamed it to New York, they also tore down the wall and reused the stones by building a street. That street got the name "Wall Street".

[@countryball4276]

Fun fact New York come from York and York is a city in England and the name York is from jordvik and jordvik in English is dirtbay and they got the name jordvik from Vikings

[@RAKUN6]

@@countryball4276 fun fact, potatoes on my toes

[@jjrj8568]

and Brooklyn comes from "Breukelen"

[@SebHaarfagre]

@@countryball4276 Jórvík* in Norse. Cool fact about the Wall Street, now it makes sense!

[@dutchafrikaner1204]

@@jjrj8568 The Bronx comes from Dr Bronck and Yankees from Jan Kees (2 famous Dutch names) Santa Claus comes from Sinterklaas.

[@RorinoTheGreat]

I just cannot fathom docking on a place like Florida without any prior knowledge of the land. That had to be such a unique human experience that may never be replicated. Like imagine living in 1500 Spain and seeing all of the trees and crocodiles and shit. That’s just so insane to me

[@RorinoTheGreat]

@@HM-eg9hv my bad I guess. Regardless I would assume they hadn’t seen a crocodile/alligator in person before that

[@grentech3435]

@@HM-eg9hv they have both

[@Ziiphyr]

Actually the term Alligator comes from the Spanish explorers in Florida. Too lazy to look up the details but it’s pretty cool the theorize theses first contacts with other civilized societies.

[@themechanictangerine]

@@Ziiphyr Yes, they called them el lagarto, the lizard, the French of Louisiana mispronounced it as aligator.

[@MirzaAhmed89]

And running into Florida Man.

[@vincentjulien]

Great summary! Precision : European fishermen (Basques, Bretons, Normans, etc.) visited the Saint-Lawrence River through the 16th century, even before Jacques Cartier's claim for New France in 1534 ; this is one century before what is shown in this video. Also, important settlements in the New France area are omitted : Montréal (Ville-Marie, 1642), Détroit (1701), La Nouvelle-Orléans (1718), whereas a lot of settlements are shown in the 13 colonies.

[@subreker2666]

IT'S NOT DISEASE OR VIRUS KILLED INDIAN, EUROPEAN GENOSIDE THE INDIAN !

[@Christophe-pl5xu]

There is one point that has always intrigued me. The Irish knew how to reach Iceland long before the Vikings. Apart from this, it is the longest route on the open sea to reach Newfoundland. why didn't they go there before then???

[@bconni2]

around this same time in the 16th century the French also tried colonizing Brazil, yet the Portuguese proved to be too much of an obstacle for them , crushing their attempts

[@AverageAlien]

Imagine living in a time where there were unknown lands on earth. Would've been epic

[@bruhemoth5599]

Till you get a scratch and die because there is no cure for that time

[@AverageAlien]

@@bruhemoth5599 oh well too bad, wouldn't care

[@bertholdt8020]

Well, we live in a time when there are unknown planets

[@xChitenshi]

now we know there's a hell lot of unknown space and water. isn't that epic too?

[@abyssstrider2547]

@@bertholdt8020 Born too late to explore the world, born too early to explore the space... It hurts.

[@danielmartins4367]

Everyone at war over gold and land The Portuguese: damn, sugar cane tastes good

[@luisalmeida1391]

Sugar was actually very rare and thus extremely expensive and although the video focuses more on how the European exploration influenced North America, with the discovery of the maritime route to India, Lisbon became one of the biggest cities in the world and Portugal became the richest country in the world because she dethroned the previous spice route. Portugal continued to explore and to expand Brazil, but wood and sugar, despite lucrative, weren't gold, as you said. However gold was found in Brazil, eventually, which triggered a lot more interest in this colony.

[@yourlocalt72]

Dutch: this nutmeg is good

[@dislike__button]

The natives: 🗿🗿🗿

[@leonelgaldinomonteiro4783]

@@luisalmeida1391 Verdade.

[@brunoalves-pg9eo]

@@luisalmeida1391 Portugal fell really behind because of the succession crisis that made it lose independence to Spain. 60 years was a lot of time during the peak of the age of exploration. After it regained independence, recovered some territories and was still ver powerful but couldnt compete with the other powers anymore, so it just developed the existing colonies.

[@joshmcdonald1141]

This shit goes so hard. I’d like to think I would’ve actually enjoyed history and geography if it were formatted like this when I was in school

[@MrDonny27]

Facts school some straight 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

[@kevinsb70]

I always loved history and geography in school but I'm old so Maybe in my day it was more interesting. Although it's not fun knowing history in this day and age. It just leads to fights with anyone under 40 because they tend to not know anything.

[@foodeater1236]

It's not too late to enjoy history

[@kevinsb70]

@Storm Zaibot so you're saying that after tens of thousands of years of inter tribe war didn't end their civilization but then Europeans landed to " civilized " them and introduce diseases that literally killed hundreds of millions alone , not including the wars fought over someone else's land by European powers wasn't the reason suddenly they all went extinct or became tiny pockets of people still alive? Just a giant coincidence that it never happened before in all of existence for them till European people got involved. Hmmmm ok.

[@kevinsb70]

@Storm Zaibot well KZbin decided to delete my response. Some of what younsay is true but much of what you say is wrong. Unfortunately KZbin won't let me converse with you

[@MegaBaconMonster]

Imagine travelling an unknown sea for countless days, only having heard stories and myths to then stumble upon land. What an amazing and also scary feeling that would of been

[@alpaz7634]

The Spanish were the first! Amazing Brave explorers!..

[@Adammy7]

If I were the sailer of that boat sailing for weeks, I would be so scared I would rather die. Those are BRAVE people.

[@magma7155]

It would have been such a scary feeling for the natives too. Their near entire population being slaughtered and toyed with, having the species they most rely on for food brought to near extinction so they'd fall in line as well as having their culture, religion and languages brainwashed and literally whipped out of their children who were ripped from their parents at a young age, likely to never see them again. Such an amazing feeling...

[@maizenn925]

@@magma7155it be like that

[@thegamingwolf5612]

Not our fault they were still stuck in the stone age its survival of the fittest out here​@@magma7155

[@rbamondes]

Portugal financed an expedition in the Amazon River in 1563 that finished in Quito, in the 1800s a new expetion was done using the diaries information, and they were able to reach Quito again.

[@editorenbici]

And before in 1541 Orellana go down from Quito and travel all the Amazon.

[@rbamondes]

​@@editorenbici Gracías, no lo sabía.

[@64jsanchez]

Brazil el robo a latinoamerica...

[@alfredoteopatara7774]

@@64jsanchez ?

[@remerodelvolga6598]

Portugal saqueadores and traitors

[@dphone7521]

The original voice over has quite a bit of character. Iconic, even. This version is good and pro style, but more generic.

[@Georgios1821]

I like this one more

[@ServantoftheDivine1701]

I like the old one more

[@gemdomingo6798]

I like Riddle's Voice here

[@ethanghim7970]

agree

[@GXG120]

This is so generic meaks this a trash video

[@athomicritics]

Spain really took a gamble with that meridian treaty when you think about it , they didnt knew how the continent shape was yet they decided the divide , they really could have ended up having the short stick

[@ruicorreia6373]

and they did. Gold was in brasil and north america, not so much in west south america, and + africa and unclamed asia....ya, Portugal won 100%

[@MrPakurfulo]

They actually lost a lot with that treaty, but there are motivations that come from the wars in north africa

[@pabloponce2307]

@@ruicorreia6373 ?? El oro estaba en los territorios españoles, principalmente en el virreinato del Perú, no inventes cr7

[@gabrielernestovillalobos5409]

@@ruicorreia6373 the gold was mostly in the Mayan, Inca empires and the continental land around the West Indies what today is modern day Colombia /Venezuela

[@luismarques9280]

They had an unbelievable luck because the Portuguese already knew that there was land over there as the Tordesillas treaty prove it. The Portuguese main focus was to keep the spice trade...

[@JosephOntime]

Spain's hegemony over the Pacific Ocean was so great that it was called the Spanish Lake.

[@dylanmurphy9389]

The Earth was called Britain

[@DCDVassili]

@@dylanmurphy9389 hahaha, NO

[@Rowlph8888]

Yes, but that's because the Narrator 1st concentrates on South America. North America, as you can see, right from the Early 1500, it was the Brits and the French and a few decades later, Dutch. There was a lot going on in the northern continent, whilst Spanish Conquistadors, were Raping and pillaging in South America, But it was less murderous and intense.You just have to take an interest and reseearch. It - it was equally interesting, Britain and the France had colonialists, who became fur trappers, who actually lived amongst the Indian tribes, in the early years, and actually married in to those communities, which was much more cooperative and less divisive than the Spanish experience, which was far more "top-down" domination, and also part of the reason why the Spanish ended up causing so much resentment, which led to the early decline, of their empire. I rremember that the Name of the French trappers, Living with the Indians were called "The Courious de bois". I remember reading about this and thinking this must have been the best time for everyone concerned, where life was hard, living off a hostile land, Without modern technology, right in the deep wild, but communication was relatively good and animosity limited, except between the British and French colonies, later when the symptoms of the 7 years War started simmering. Remember, the 1st settlers were pretty much left alone by the Crown and the people Were living a relatively free life, even though the risks were far higher, in an unpredictable sense

[@DCDVassili]

@@Rowlph8888 You should learn geography and know what North America covers. and you should ask yourself why there are so few indigenous people in Canada and the US. The English did not mix with the natives and marginalized them, while the Spanish mixed with the natives

[@Rowlph8888]

@@DCDVassili Stop with your propaganda. You should try to learn the Difference between a "US citizen", post 1776 and a working class English settler, before the 7 years War (approx: 1575-1748). t's a matter-of-fact that the English crown, "refused" the settlers requests, who kept asking to be able to push to the west and Violate "Treaties" That had been agreed to, With the natives and were Honoured, by the British Crown. The Brits were there for 200 years, before the Americans independence, but still only maintained colonies on the eastern border. It Wasn't until after the "American Independence", That the Settlers Began (Under the Bullshit manifest destiny lie) began to Push into the West and Started Causing More Atrocities. So it's the opposite of what you are saying. The original "working class", fur trapping colonialists, from Britain and france, wanted to escape the hegemony, of the crowns of theiir respective kingdoms and many did live, marry and trade, amongst the natives. With Regards to those Spanish exploiting and violating, I wasnt talking about the Spanish "working class", or settlers, I was talking about the Imperial "upper classes(Conquistadsors) that were sent there, who were causing the exploitation.The difference was that In the case of the original settlers forming from Britain and France, the Crowns, in those countries, were not so bothered about the new world, at that stage, as they had domestic issues.A bit later is when the Crown got involved and conflict Between Britain and France, started to be more severe, as a Kind of proxy war. Also, there were far more losses amongst the indigenous in South than in North America.Even though the Spanish crown and many religious figures, wanted more peaceful indigenous contact, the Conquistadors, ddidn't honour those wishes and destroyed communities,, wherever they went, Stealing gold and taking it to Spain and reacting aggressively when the indigenous misunderstood and reacted ambiguously to attempted religious indoctrination.

[@DeadEyeDave]

This completely ignores the northward Spanish expansion along the west coast of North America beginning in 1542 with Cabrillo's expedition. That is a HUGE hole in the story. Vizcaino came along 70 years later. Most of the place-names in coastal California are from that second expedition.

[@volbound1700]

There was a lot missing but I think they wanted to do the highlights. A lot about the 13 colonies, France expansion, and early Spanish expeditions were missing.

[@juncearyoutube3336]

Yet the video mentions irrelevant Drake expedition. Big Anglosaxon bias.

[@magtovi]

The U.S. always tries to sweep under the rug anything that can take away the legitimacy of their imperial expansion, conquest and thus ownership of the lands to the west of their 13 colonies.

[@hansjorgkunde3772]

Yeah Los Angeles clearly a British name isn't it ?

[@angelf2966]

@@hansjorgkunde3772 Los Ángeles, San Diego, San Francisco... San Agustín was the first city founded by Europeans.

[@joseluisfernandez6592]

Spain reached Alaska in 1791, at that moment Spain ruled the whole Pacific coast of America, from cape of Horn in south Chile to Alaska cities like Valdez or Cordova

[@LucidFL]

a few settlements and ports north of mexico means control over the entire pacific coast?

[@joseluisfernandez6592]

@@KentoKei the same for the british. Did the british directly controlled Canada, Australia and India? Of course not. The important thing in America is that there are spanish names from the artic circle to the antartic circle, that's why spanish is the most spoken language in America. The claim couldn't be enforced because you know, icy lands, as you said Spain built stetlements in the area, some explorers were sent to the area by the King Charles III of Spain just to explore the territory. The thing is that Spain had a way more richer territories than British in Canada or Australia, most people don't know but Australia was discovered by spaniards as well as Canada and most people don't know why Canada is called Canada, spaniards named canada "Acá nada" that means "here nothing" Why to claim an icy land where a penguin Will fell cold when you have the "Virreinato de Nueva España" which is the actual Mexico, Mexico is nowadays the country that produce the most silver and Peru is the second, How much petrol Venezuela has? How much iron latin america has? How much zinc latin america has? Copper is used everywhere for electricity and Peru is the second country that produce more copper only behind China.

[@joseluisfernandez6592]

@@LucidFL Canal de Camacho Isla de San Gonzalo Islas de los Pilotos Isla de la niebla Islas Trinidad Florida Blanca Isla de Camacho Volcán Miranda Bahía de Quadra Isla de Cañizares Isla San Aniceto Ensenada de Nuestra Señora de la Regla Puerto de Revillagigedo Isla de San Antonio Isla de Quirós Isla Rosa Puerto Santiago Punta Cañizares Puerto de Flores Boca de Quadra Isla de Quimper Isla del Conde Puerto Valdés Puerto Mazarredo Puerto Gravina Isla de la Magdalena Islas de las Culpas Puerto Córdoba Santa Rosa Punta de Cañas Isla del Carmen Puerto de Desengaño Cabo Muñoz Puerto Mulgrave Ensenada de Castilla Bahía de Palma Isla de lobos Bahía de Guadalupe Cabo Engaño Isla de Santa Cristina Isla de Pérez Isla de Santa Margarita Puerto de los Remedios Ensenada del Susto Monte San Jacinto Puerto y entrada de Bucareli Cabo de San Agustín Isla de Revillagigedo Canal de Revillagigedo Islas Zayas Campania Canal de Laredo Isla Gil Isla Aristazabal Fuerte de San Miguel Santa Cruz de Nuca Surgidero de San Lorenzo Isla Flores Flores Isla de Vargas Vargas Canal de Alberni Alberni Voluntarios de Cataluña Pilar de Fuga Fuerte Núñez Gaona Punta de los Mártires Rada de Bucareli Entrada de Heceta Isla de Quadra y Vancouver Isla Cortés Isla Hernando Isla Texada Isla Lasqueti Isla de las ballenas Gran canal de Nuestra Señora Rosario Marinena Bocas de Carmelo Punta de la bodega Río de Floridablanca Isla Saturna Isla de los Patos Estrecho de Haro Isla Pacheco Seno Gastón Puerto Socorro Islas del San Juan Montaña del Carmelo Seno Padillo Islas Güemes y San Vicente Boca de Fidalgo Puerto de Córdoba Puerto de San Juan Puerto de Quadra Punta Santa Cruz Dungeness Puerto de Nuestra Señora de los Ángeles Estrecho de Juan de Fuca Río de San Roque Río de Aguilar Cabo Blanco That's only in the territory of Nutca (the actual Alaska) Imagine the rest of Canada, USA, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Chile

[@FF-qp4xq]

They never control cap Horn, he even tell it in the video.

[@arthassblindfollower9072]

@Weasel I’m pretty sure he said America, not just North America. North America has roughly 317 million English speakers and 121 million Spanish speakers, so yes. English is more in North America. But in South America, because he clearly said Arctic to Antarctic, there is 5.4 million English speakers and about 210 million Spanish speakers. The Caribbean, also apart of the Americas, is 64% Spanish, though i cant find a Spanish speaking population number that excludes islands already counted in north and South America. In Central America, there is an additional 32 million Spanish speakers. So that’s looking to be 360 million Spanish speakers to 322 million English speakers (I didn’t count the 400k English creoles speakers in Central America as I was avoiding too many decimals)

[@FalandraAoC]

I love the use of the black, unexplored areas of the map, kinda like it's in strategy games with the fog of War! It's interesting that the fog of war like its known in games is actually a real military theory (Clausewitz, 19th century), yet so many people connect it with games (which got the idea of it from the military theory as well).

[@DBoone123]

The first European explorer to navigate the Amazon River was Francisco de Orellana. Orellana's exploration occurred during the years 1541-1542.

[@najimidayo]

Even though Rahul has dropped voicing these videos, (and personally I think his voice is so calming to listen to) the content of these videos still remain top notch as they did before, and hey let’s welcome Matthew as a positive change. And as Rahul himself stated, we’ll get used to the new voice soon. Stay strong Rahul, and welcome Matthew

[@karibrimacombe8710]

He sounds like he'd be in one of those weird top ten monsters caught on camera videos

[@caminationsshorts1523]

@@karibrimacombe8710XX We say XX as its the British version of lol

[@hazmatsquad6703]

@@caminationsshorts1523 Not really. I’m British and I’ve never heard anyone say XX.

[@polishedpebble4111]

Fog of War adds A LOT to the video. You get to see what european people at the time saw.

[@KalonOrdona2]

Agreed! Really makes history exciting!

[@gabrieldnchf2822]

@@NinjaChi NOOOOOO ITALY IS A LITTLE TOO CURVY THIS VIDEO IS SHIT NOOOOOOOOOOOO

[@petmop1309]

@@gabrieldnchf2822 i think he meant in medieval times, people couldn't make accurate maps

[@sdsd2e2321]

@@petmop1309 Maps didn't need to be perfect, captains aboard vessels wouldn't use the maps to navigate, rather latitudes and magnetic directions which obviously were accurate, otherwise there wouldn't be any return voyages.

[@petmop1309]

@@sdsd2e2321 that's a fact, I'm just saying they weren't accurate

[@ciaoitalo]

Man I feel like I spent my whole life learning all the little pieces of that and you just put them all together

[@jimdavies6764]

Admirable account! I like the way that unexplored areas remain black. As the pioneers found new coasts, they did not know what lay inland, of course. This presentation portrays that vividly.

[@rfvtgbzhn]

6:21 it was not just impresion by firearms and horses. These peoples were actually enemies of the Aztecs and saw their chance to win a war against them in an Alliance with the Spaniards.

[@damianhoster7975]

correct

Good amplification, but in order to see a chance to win for such a small group of people you must first get really impressed by the things they bring with them, which was the point.

[@rfvtgbzhn]

@ from what I know the number of natives fighting against the Aztec was roughly the same as the number of Aztec warriors. The few Spaniards with limited ammo were just a small factor in the conflict, though they might have tipped the scale. The Spaniards had about 1% of the men that their allies had and most of th didn't have firearms, from what I know only a few dozen had them and firearms of the early 16th century weren't that much better than arrows.

[@nnacchho5715]

Yes civilizations conquered by the aztecs like the toltekas that were usually enslaved and sacrified to keep in order.

[@stsk1061]

​@@rfvtgbzhnThe Spanish defeated the natives in the first place.

[@sefirotsama]

You also forgot to mention Spanish exploration of the whole west coast up to Alaska and the late conflict it became with the Russian until its cession. Also you missed the whole Spanish foundation of California. If you include Luisiana which was part of Spain barely a few years, more than half today’s United States was once Spanish.

[@sammortakai5247]

Didn't Texas beat the shit out of the whole Mexican Army and now its Texas.

[@ikad5229]

@@sammortakai5247 What does the Texan army fighting the independent Mexican army has to do with Spain

[@sammortakai5247]

@@ikad5229 You're right it actually had nothing to do with it.

[@Пень1Бук1]

General Ruminahui

[@adelesr4965]

António Silva United States was once Spanish. Mentira Lie Being part of Castile like this is right. The name of Spain did not exist at that time. The name of Spain was born in 1876

[@skinerd0001]

This is awesome. The fog of war gives it the feel and mystery of Civilization (the game). I learned so much and this helps to explain why and how the European countries took over America. This is crack for a history nerd.

[@kami3000]

hehehe, this Video is making me wanna play Colonization ;)

[@RenaissanceYann]

Europa Universalis is next level compared to Civ. Try that or CK 2 and/or 3

[@Andrew-px9fj]

@@RenaissanceYann true, EU IV is on a level of its own, the best of its kind!

[@deanphillips746]

@@Andrew-px9fj amazing game I've got over 1k hours in it. Love playing as a either England,Spain or Holland :)

[@eaar]

it mustve been incredible exploring a new continent and hearing that there are multiple huge empires already inhabiting it

[@DavidLodgeclassof]

A simplification, but well presented. One part of the simplification that I can see is that it draws maps based on claims more than settlements. The French claims Western Newfoundland, yes, but they never had more than a few hundred in all of Newfoundland, and even those were in the North and South. Calling this a permanent settlement of the West is thus a stretch. I really appreciate the role of the Catholic Church mentioned, though. There was a great internal fight in Spain over slavery

[@thomasr3805]

This was so amazing. I learned about all of these expeditions in Latin American Studies courses, but to see the real-time progress map was really interesting.

[@subreker2666]

IT'S NOT DISEASE OR VIRUS KILLED INDIAN, EUROPEAN GENOSIDE THE INDIAN !

[@jcs3142]

It's good that finally someone pays attention to the attempts by the Spanish kings to make all people in America equal (as the video says, not everybody liked or followed that, but that was the idea). However, the map does not show all of the Spanish territories in Europe.

[@robertmartin8907]

I think that the good the did was solidly overshadowed by them being 100% responsible for the African slave trade

[@PP-sj7pl]

@@robertmartin8907 you forgot about the english

[@genericchannel1754]

@@PP-sj7pl and the Dutch, and the French, and the Portuguese. But you're Spanish so you're probably just raised from childhood to hate Britain anyways so why bother.

[@PP-sj7pl]

@@genericchannel1754 ive been raised from my childhood to hate Spain and its history. I said England as normally those who acuse Spain of being the only ones trading with african slaves are the english but of course those two werent the only ones.

[@genericchannel1754]

@@PP-sj7pl But Spain hardly even traded slaves, the primary traders of slaves were the Portuguese, the British, and the Dutch.

[@lancemadrazo]

When you wanted to find a route to Asia but instead became one of the greatest colonial powers ever

[@worfoz]

They knew back then that the Suez channel might get blocked. They had astrology. And Tarot.

[@Inanchi05]

@@worfoz mm yes Tarot showed them the way.

[@fuguthefish]

@@worfoz Cringe :))

[@Decenium]

greatest = most horrific

[@lMobiuscidl]

@@Decenium that's the English. Who actually exterminated natives (i.e. United States and Australia)

[@JonaHernandez-v4b]

I can only imagine if this happens in a new planet, new stories to know, unknown lands to discover,hope the humanity survive to that moment.

[@pletiplot]

1:10 The Portuguese rejects the project because they recognized the Columbus calculations are probably incorrect. Which actually were, Columbus calculated with wrong length of the ancient length unit "stadium" and he suppose Asia is half distance than it actually was.

[@cleess2836]

Plus they were focused on reaching India and well on their way, ahead of everyone else. They actually did it, contrary to many others, and for a few years ruled the Indian Ocean and controlled the Spice Trade becoming the World's Richest Nation for a small period of time (about 60 years). The Iberian Union, though, brought that edge down...

[@falmin2512]

The Portuguese didn't reject Columbus because his calculations were incorrect. They rejected him because he wanted to explore and tell the world what he would find during his voyages, but Portugal already knew that there was a large land (America) between Europe and Asia and they didn't want other countries to know of it. Obviously they didn't know the size of it, but they did know that Columbus would find it and quickly spread word of it to all europe. The fact that Brazil was "officially" discovered by Portugal in the year 1500, means that the portuguese already knew of it's existence way before Columbus found America, and decided to make their claim to Brazil official.

[@Dariet88]

Go back to your bacalhao

[@renatogomescosta1687]

Portugal já conhecia as Américas antes de Colombo. A esposa de Colombo era portuguesa Felipa Moniz Perestrelo, filha de Bartolomeu Perestrelo. Bartolomeu aprendeu a navegar com o Infante D. Henrique de Portugal que foi o precursor da navegação portuguesa. O Pai e os Irmãos de Felipa já sabiam da existência de terras além do Atlântico, mas uma segunda rota não seria bom para os portugueses. Detalhe: Fernão de Magalhães, capitão que descobriu a segunda rota das índias e batizou o oceano pacífico também era português.

[@pletiplot]

@@falmin2512 This is a very extraordinary claim and every extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. Do you have some?

[@bradleywoods1999]

The old voice over is so easy on the ears and is a real joy to listen to, this new one is very generic sounding. Bring back the old one please Edit : he sounds like one of those robotic voices, plus I’m not tying to be mean to the voice guy I’m just being honest with how I feel about this change.

[@suryanarayan1]

Yes , You are right.

[@ilikechocolate3741]

Yes, he is right.

[@mysterious7215]

Yes u are right

[@nikkiholdmeier7678]

How it show hard to understand what it he saying

[@antonipolski9569]

Ya

[@Angel_Gomez]

Also, when Columbus brought some natives back, the Catholic Queen Isabel ordered him to release them

[@neochris2]

The Catholics, the Queen and the priests were super worried about the wellbeing of the natives. They held conferences and agreed they were not barbarians but humans with soul and dignity. The conquistadors on the other hand were businessmen of war and they often clashed with the church due to the mistreatment of natives, and generally ignored the laws that protected natives. In any case, by far the worse enemy of the natives were the viruses they had no defenses against.

[@s.w.stryker6491]

This seems like a big bunch if BS to me, especialy taught bythe Spanish educational system. Learn anything about the actual story of my people in south america. Their concept of "evangelization" required the suppresion of people's humanity, slavery, genocide, and rape.

[@s.w.stryker6491]

Just read about El Requerimiento of 1513 in which it was declared that Spain had the right to do whatever they wanted with the natives. Not only could they do it legally, but morally as well, being endorsed by the catholic church

[@Angel_Gomez]

@@s.w.stryker6491 as long as they were converted to Christianity. Furthermore, the University of Salamanca had a quarrel arguing if they were capable of knowing the concept of Property, for if they did, their lands couldn't be taken. That meant some native tribes converted to Christianity and kept their lands and form of government, giving in return a part of their harvest. Furthermore, mixing was encouraged. It's a way of conquest similar to what the Roman empire did. Compare it to Locke's idea of property for the conquest, where he said that only those who worked the fields could be considered owners (a theory made ad hoc for the British conquest of north America, for there was a majority of nomad tribes). That meant when the British started expanding and working the fields, they were legally abide to kill and exterminate every native tribe that entered their lands, as they weren't considered owners, but invaders. As a result you have a few natives alive in the US and Canada and a majority of the population mixed from Mexico to the southernmost part of the Spanish Empire

[@s.w.stryker6491]

@Angel_Gomez Any historical record that proves this? Because everywhere I've looked disproves any sort of reasoning like that. Also, even if it's true that some of their rights are protected if they are converted to Christianity, how do you think the locals were compelled to be converted? How were they compelled to be mixed if not forced into "grape"? Read about the story of any of the countries of my people and see how many chose it was so very nice of the spanish to come sack them, so much so that they willingly change their religion to theirs, and ho much they let them keep their lands for it. Look at any distribution of the population even today in any of those countries and you'll see that the great majority of wealth stayed through the centuries in the household of Spanish Last Names, and caucasian looking people. I wonder why, if the natives had so many rights

[@JoseRuizLopez-cx1hz]

2:39 "as a heroe", actually Queen Isabela the Catholic was disgusted about Colon's behaviour with natives.

[@LuisTheFilmHack]

At 7:06 there's a mistake. Cortes allied with the adversaries of the Aztecs long before the siege of Tenochtitlan.

[@damianhoster7975]

true

[@alexmag342]

There a lot of mistakes in the video, Portugal had colonies in Labrador and Newfoundland long before the British or Columbus. We also had found Brasil before Columbus ever had any thought to sail west Also America as a name was not an agreed term, not even remotely it, it was disputed for over 200 years

[@javiermp2529]

@@alexmag342 Lo que me gusta de estos videos es que siempre aparece una nacionalidad nueva que descubrió América antes que Castilla

[@eetuthereindeer6671]

Its fricked up that after they razed tenochtitlan, a truky beautiful city worth preservation, they turned on the natives that were a part of the attack. Disgusting.

[@Dianita1002]

"Does your god requires human sacrifices?" Cortes: no Native: Jesus here we go. 😂😂😂😂

[@Daymickey]

I LOVE that the unknown world is shaded black. It helps give us their perspective. Excellent video! 👌🏽

[@inyourwalls-q6p]

The new voiceover doesn't have the same vibe as the old one, but it's still good

[@user-es3dr5xk8f]

Even microsoft sam's voice would fit better

[@Mr.Prince_Tunmise]

Agreed

[@Erde_midget770]

Yep

[@cynic2201]

I’m gonna miss the old voiceovers... I loved them

[@bewertsam]

I think what people are missing is a casual tone. This guy is a great narrator but I think it comes off as commercial and manufactured. It’s not that he’s a bad narrator, his performance just isn’t right for this type of content. Maybe with some recommendations he could be perfect for the channel

[@FGPR01BrunoCauz]

The first germans, polish, czechs, flemish (belgians), swiss and maybe from other central european countries to set foot on continental mainland of New World was in 1529, so as to work as miners to search El Dorado in actual Venezuela . The leased colony by Emperor Charles V to the Augsburg banker family of Welser was called "Klein Venedig" and its capital Coro was named "Neu Augsburg", Maracaibo "Neu Nüremberg" and Cabimas o "Neu Ulm". Some expeditions inland departed from Coro and El Tocuyo (also given a german name as Tocuyothal) searching for El Dorado. "Klein Venedig" didn't last long though, this was due to both poor results and complaints from miners and locals, thus Emperor Charles V didn't renew the contract to the Welsers (bankers from Augsburg). Some very old and forgotten cemeteries in NW Venezuela may have some surnames still, no idea. This was at a time when the portuguese were still exploring lands which soon later became Brazil and the spanish just arriving to Cuzco and the River Plate. 🇩🇪🇻🇪 🤠👍 That's right the reasons of the Welser expeditions was to find Eldorado for that, they didn't make a culture legacy and now Maracaibo (The principal city than they created ) doesn't have nothing of germ an culture appart of the Tovar colony established in 1842. But in the Second World War with the germans emigration they build and reapairs so much of his old colonies these new villages start to buiding to equaty than in otrers countries like Peru, Brasil, Chile, Uruguay and Argentina that's when they finally make a legacy in that's countries (Culture legacy). sorry for the fails in the coment, my english is not very nice .

[@joelcrow]

As an adult, many years out of school, these quick refreshers are invaluable!

[@ZeroEagle667]

What do you mean, they're great

[@joelcrow]

@@ZeroEagle667 not unvaluable, invaluable! 😉

[@francisvoyer]

Fun fact, we still have a majority of French speakers in Québec, but we also have French minorities in Acadia and the rest of New France’s territory!

[@the_ancient_library]

Cortez didn’t even leave Cuba with permission, his trip’s funding was cut, so he hurried to the harbor and just left before anyone knew what was going on. They couldn’t load food on board so they had to stop frequently, hence how they met La Malinche and Aguilar on the way

[@Edexote]

And without both of them they would never be able to gain allies and defeat the Aztecs.

[@celeridad6972]

@@Edexote yeah, its one of those butterfly effects, human history is just amazing xD

[@trashcantacos]

​@@Edexoteso I as a Mexican wouldn't exist 😢😂

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

Superbly presented - bravo! Greetings from Greece.

[@Tusiriakest]

There was a portuguese colony in Canada called Terra do Lavrador, latter Labrador. Unfortunately it was not mentioned =\

[@martinoavalos721]

It was terrenova that means new land in portuguese

[@Omerath9]

Yes, and the expansion of Brazil resulting from the gold and silver rush in the late 17th century is not mentioned here. The Portuguese found more gold in Brazil in 30 years (1690 - 1720) than the Spanish found in the previous 200 years in America, and it allowed Brazil to become the most profitable colony in the Americas by 1720, and King John V to become the King with more gold in the world. It really should have been mentioned. It gave Portugal a considerable amount of power in South America.

[@rodri_rf9200]

E tambem a terra Nova dos bacalhaus

[@jaylenrebollar7776]

Probably its forgotten in some countrys

[@neruba2173]

This video is made by an englishman, the bias its obvious. You can see him struggling to bend facts at some points.

[@pdalmao]

This new voice just makes it seem like a really cheesy American documentary. Please bring back the old voice if you can, it gave a much more informative and honest vibe!

[@fathfez7991]

I don't want to offend the person but, I do think the same. It is more articulate in the language pronunciation but yeah I'd choose the og one.

[@pdalmao]

@@fathfez7991 Oh yeah, no i totally agree with you. I should have been more kind in my original comment but this kind of narration is just synonymous with these mega corportation owned channels that clickbait and overexaggerate everything. The old voice was more down to earth and definitely made me feel like I was watching something informative, entertaining, and honest. Not just commercialised rubbish like TheRichest for example.

[@fathfez7991]

@@pdalmao Yeah, no it's okay. I thought the same. It sounds weird and my brain immediately associates the guy's voice as 'entertainment only, no knowledge to learn here' and very similar those cheesy tips and facts channels indeed.

[@JESL_TheOnlyOne]

I can tell this crowd is chock full of intellectual powerhouses who make judgments based on how somebody's voice sounds or imply that Americans are shallow, somehow. Should I just draw the conclusion some folks here are pretentious, condescending jerks?

[@yogirathod7944]

yeap i agree with ya

[@ArqAngilberto]

Oh the Spanish... 5:32 Vasco Núñez de Balboa discovers the Pacific Ocean... calling it "Mar Del Sur" all happened here in my country Panamá. The Spanish settlers that took the part of the Pacific Ocean are my ancestors... we even got a Family Tree detailed.

[@ezsu]

This is one of the best animations I've ever seen keep up the good work:) !

[@funes4355]

These names that he provides is a great way for viewers to make connections with the continent countries

[@UnRealistic.]

I kinda like matt's voice too ...can both Rahul and matt do voiceovers in a single video...

[@SignsBehindScience]

Yes, I also want old one.. Love from Pakistan!

[@jackbullimore812]

The old voice over guy was what made these videos so unique and watchable. That flair is lost now with this new bloke. Please bring the old guy back?

[@Nexandr]

The old guy left by his own wish so can't come back.

[@Fred_the_1996]

@@Nexandr :(

[@richardfrenette6648]

Nice work! However, the omission of the three trips of Jacques Cartier (1534, 1535-36 and 1541-42) is a major oversight. He is the discoverer of what is called Canada. He spent a whole winter there (not a small feat). He even gave it its name!

[@Zeldaytal]

The kingdom of Navarra is not modern Euskadi, hance not having the borders shown in the video. Its not even the same region. Basque country always belong to Castille and they were the ones who took down Navarra, adding it to Castille. Its a common mistake in foreign videos using modern sources.

[@lucascaldasdecarvalhoferre5757]

I just got to know this channel and it's already one of my favorites ... I love maps and learning about history and other subjects in the way that this channel teaches is spectacular ... Too bad I'm not fluent in English, because I'm sure that my experience would be much better (have advanced english, but in general I understand everything because of the context) Please continue with the videos 😁👍

[@gloriachavez1865]

I too

[@rubenvanbelzen1217]

Wow I didn’t know that part of little Venice and Venezuela, that part is amazing!

[@yellowgreengo6764]

the most iconic and visited place left from that time is called colonia tovar, i used to visit it when i was a kid living in venezuela. it is like a small little german mountain town, ripe with strawberries and such.

[@kvtechvarshney5179]

Great video. Very well explained with geographical maps , colours and timelines!

[@DouxPsychopathe]

The man who bought Manhattan was Pierre Minuit (Pieter Minnewit), he was a calvinist of walloon origins, a lot of the first settlers in Manhattan were walloons. (The colony itself was of course Dutch.)

[@DenUitvreter]

Again the American nonsense about the purchase of Manhatten. It was bought for 60 guilders in goods, not specified but things like axes and copper kettles were in demand by the natives. It's probably almost like a half year's wages for a skilled craftsman, which were very well paid in the Dutch Republic and shipping it over an ocean wasn't free either, so not such a bad deal for the natives. There's more BS in the video. Of course the Dutch protestants didn't flee Europe in fear of catholicism. The Dutch Republic of the Seven United Provinces had religous tolerance, and was led by protestants. It was at war with Spain because it had declared independence from Spain in 1581 because they wanted religious tolerance. So the Dutch Republic didn't take advantage of the Iberian Union, they got a bigger enemy to fight. They took to war to the oceans because Spain was using it's colonial profits and the Portugese to finance the 80-years war against the Dutch Republic. Poorly researched video

[@pulsarplay5808]

@@DenUitvreter The supposed religious tolerance was but a poor excuse and the main argument of the Flemish rebels for independence from the Habsburg empire. In fact, the Protestant Reformation was never born as a demonstration against the abuses of the Catholic Church for its illicit enrichment, but was born as a political argument to break with Rome, which was the one who gave divine legitimacy to the emperors and kings. That was the foundation of the Protestant break and the commission that Luther received to initiate that break by Flemish nobles and some German princes. Denying the legitimacy of the emperor, breaking with the Habsburg house, becoming independent from the empire and incidentally ... appropriating all the assets of the Church (the other main argument). The religious question? Of course, against everything the Dutch and British have said for centuries, Philip II was a religious guy, but he didn't give a shit about Dutch or English Protestantism. He had in fact proposed to the very Protestant Elizabeth I of England without seeming to care too much that the rite was also performed by a Protestant bishop. What did bother him was the Flemish rebellion that he considered a true betrayal against the legitimate monarch, and also the help that this one obtained from the English. The religious changes were due exclusively to a mixture of political and economic interests. Exactly the same as in England. The religious question as a theological fact, perhaps the illiterate citizen cared about something (I don't think so), but the political leader did not. That's for sure. Everything was political intricacies to get more shares of power, more property and more money. Centuries of propaganda have tarnished a good part of what many people today still consider to be history. Little by little we will clean it.

[@BucyKalman]

Spanish colonization gets a bad reputation, but the truth is that, until the early 18th century at least, the Spanish American colonies were far richer and more prosperous than the North American English colonies for example . It would be interesting if viewers here could comment on that. To me, the worst colonizers in America were actually the French. Haiti is probably the poorest country in the Americas today and the French settlement colonies in North America (Acadia, Canada and Louisiana) were mostly underpopulated and underdeveloped. I think the Portuguese were not much better either, but colonial Brazil at least had some periods of economic boom with sugar production in the 17th century (temporarily under Dutch control) and mining in the 18th century. Brazil was, however, also underdeveloped compared to Spanish America and only took off when the Portuguese court moved to Rio de Janeiro.

[@luismarques9280]

Really? Think again and ask any Inca or Astec descendents what they think about the Spanish! Development? Yeah! All that gold and silver from the indigenous lands....

[@synkaan2167]

In America the French didn't colonized the same way English or Spanish did, they were there to trade most of the time and didn't settled near as much nor expelled or killed the native.

[@yomismo6912]

sorry but spain dont have colonies...have virreinatos....virreinatos are spain too

[@lusobrasileiro6390]

amazing how a country as small as Portugal managed to be one of the pioneers in the discovery of new lands beyond europe, proud to have the sanhue of this brave people of the Atlantic.

[@neilhembrowicp6465]

ENGLAND runs, mate 🇬🇧

[@ottovestergaardjack362]

The vikings discovered it first

[@Omerath9]

@Jesus Bermudez Yes, amazing, because Portugal had a population of 1 million people, whilst Spain had 7 million, England had 10 million, France 14 million and the Dutch 2 million, and still, Portugal managed to finance most of the maritime expeditions done at the time; en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_maritime_explorers Portugal financed around 50, whilst Spain for instance, only 10.

[@Omerath9]

@Jesus Bermudez What a ridiculous claim. First of all, the Portuguese maritime explorations began decades before the fall of Constantinople, and I fail to understand how developing the first ever maritime technology in history for inter oceanic navigation, and being the people on Earth who established the highest number of maritime routes not being amazing. How many other nations on Earth had coasts and didn't even establish one maritime route? Seems like you are prettily trying to downplay the Portuguese maritime achievements, which is unsurprising, given your Spanish surname.

[@Omerath9]

@Jesus Bermudez Spain, France and England have bigger Atlantic coasts than Portugal. The age of exploration could have started there, it didn't. Africa and Asia had countless coastal kingdoms, it could have started there, it didn't. Japan could have found the sea route to Europe, they didn't. Congo could have found the sea route to India, they were closer to it than Portugal, as well as any other western African country, they didn't. India could have found the sea route to Europe, they didn't. And I could go on and on. Your argument is nonsensical Portugal began the age of maritime exploration because it was the first country in the world to have the technological capability of doing so. Could have been countless other regions on Earth, in much better geographic positions than Portugal, but it wasn't. What Portugal did was indeed amazing. At a time when the ENTIRE world thought that interoceanic travel was impossible, as well as the Atlantic and Indian Ocean being closed oceans, the Portuguese were the first to prove that wrong. Geographic position meant nothing, considering the amount of countries on Earth that had much better coasts, in much better positions, than Portugal. It had nothing to do with geography, but rather TECHNOLOGY. I suggest you take the time to read up a bit more.

[@sylvesterpalermo937]

You completely missed the mission of Don Tristan DeLuna which was sent by the then Governor. from Mexico in 1559 to establish a new colony in Ochuse, which is now Pensacola Florida. This was the first settlement in the land to become the USA. Had it not been for a hurricane Pensacola would have been the first city in the United States, 4 years before St Augustine

[@mrjayjay124]

Damn, ima miss Rahul, but Matt is just as good!

[@anthemhub]

Awesome video! Love the use of blacked-out areas to show what was known to Europeans at the time.

[@tomhughes1007]

Leave Matt alone, he’s doing his best. Sure, the other voice is what we all got to know, but why not give Matt a chance

[@ellgndd5343]

But its not fun with the new voice

[@West_Kagle]

@Tom Hughes Has nothing to do with liking or not liking Matt....it's like going back to an old haunt and the friend you came to see is no longer around.

[@West_Kagle]

@@user-wn1un7ih6b LOL....Nice! 😉

[@ellgndd5343]

@SebiscuitTheGreat OOOF Yes but the reason people watch it and don’t read it in a book is that that is more fun

[@West_Kagle]

@SebiscuitTheGreat OOOF Wow, this is the second comment I've had to ask the question...did you actually read my post. Here it is in case you need a better look: 'Has nothing to do with liking or not liking Matt....it's like going back to an old haunt and the friend you came to see is no longer around.' So tell me.....how is that selfish....or did the definition of selfish get completely watered down like the terms, racist, sexist, harassments, Nazi, and oppressive. ¬_¬

[@mc95975]

Great video, congratulations 👏🏻

[@michaell8722]

You missed the Spanish establishment north of the rio grande (New Mexico) in 1598 by Ornate.

[@brandonlawrence5851]

As well as the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 and subsequent Reconquista in '92, but this is such a huge topic that I think it can be forgiven.

[@Jacksiloution]

Noo why did you change the voice over, you were perfect before

[@warrenkensington6091]

I prefer this one without any asian accents

[@sravasaksitam]

@@warrenkensington6091 this voice is very dull

[@cringylegend2082]

@@warrenkensington6091 Accent was what made it good

[@somedudethatripsplanetinha4221]

heres a opinion that will have disrespecful brats attack me: *why are you attacking this new voice. in my opinion there should be a small variation of voices. now please stop attacking him for his voice.*

[@kappalol8250]

@@somedudethatripsplanetinha4221 They are not attacking anyone if you interperet it like that that's your problem they are just saying they prefer the old one. And i would say you're a disrespectful brat who doesn't know that people are allowed to share there opinion on the internet. And of course your the one who started being disrespectful the rest where just sharing there opinion.

[@xGoodOldSmurfehx]

im legitimately impressed, so few people actually know stuff about the colonization era, especially the history of New France i know very well how this type of quality of content requires an absurd about of knowledge and research amazing work :D altho i must say one thing for those interested, New France's story is extremely complicated, extremely deep and rich and the video did not even begin to scratch it

[@The_Omegaman]

This is the best video I’ve ever watched on KZbin.

[@TheJstroud24]

Dude this is so great. I’ve always loved history but seeing it in this format just makes everything so much better. Keep up the good work dude, this is really awesome stuff.

[@subreker2666]

IT'S NOT DISEASE OR VIRUS KILLED INDIAN, EUROPEAN GENOSIDE THE INDIAN !

[@jamesfraser2209]

Really like the use of black in this video! So effective!

[@trentfila6186]

Thank you for adding more content to the video rather than reupload.

[@rebbrown7140]

Excellent summary! As a history buff, I approve. And I wish I had access to stuff like this when I was in school.

[@ksoman953]

This visualization is great and logically contextualizes the changing world in such a different but likely correct way!! Awesome!!

[@fedgesmedjji7494]

I enjoyed this and its really well done. I already knew a large amount of this history but when it's put all together like this it's so much easier to understand how/when it was all going on around the same time.

[@subreker2666]

IT'S NOT DISEASE OR VIRUS KILLED INDIAN, EUROPEAN GENOSIDE THE INDIAN !

[@RodrigoFerreira-bs6hd]

12:50 you can see the current french flag in Newfoundland

[@fanegaquince6327]

Actually the "mistress" he received after a confontration, was a noble, and according to many current historians she was probably way more than a simple translator. Also Cortés left Cuba not sent by the governor but without his permission

[@bobsmith3291]

Imagine how scary it was setting off and landing in unknown lands not knowing what you’ll find when you get there

[@sebastianlomascolo5169]

Imagine how scary the natives will be when they se a los of randoms guys with rifles.

[@bobsmith3291]

@@sebastianlomascolo5169 they wouldn’t know what a rifle was

[@sebastianlomascolo5169]

@@bobsmith3291 I'm sorry if I was aggressive, I was a little off that night.

[@MiyamotoAiko]

​@@bobsmith3291 Let's just say "small iron bows that go kapew".

[@northamerica5142]

@@sebastianlomascolo5169 Superior technology doesn't equal fear. Many of the great native American civilizations could've crushes colonization attempts had things gone slightly different. Remember, the only reason Europeans dominates was because of luck and dominoes falling intonplace

[@magnuslh84]

well made! It is structured, visually appealing and has a narrator who is easy to follow!

[@Gloriaimperial1]

Map: Long before 1492 (in 1100 and 1200), the Basque provinces were linked to Castile. Only Navarre was independent (1513), and had no access to the sea.

[@nicolabragato3512]

Really nice grafic ! I appreciate how you uncover new territory

[@historygeek4075]

Really like your videos!! I would like to make a recommendation for some videos I think many viewers would be interested in. Please do a more ancient historical era. Rome would definitely be a good one, perhaps Greece or other ancient civilizations, their history and how they expanded.

[@kayharker712]

Hands down the most informative history video I've seen on KZbin thanks to the map being only revealed as it is discovered. Bravo !!

[@spacemonk26]

This is a really great visualization gives a lot of context into what must have been going through the minds of the people back then what they must have thought without knowing about what was actually out there

[@noemedmedia]

'Qistadors exploring the map like I explore video game maps. Such players!

[@o.ramirez]

It is incredible, the Dominican 🇩🇴 identity began to be forged on December 5, 1492, Dominicans have more than five centuries in the Hispaniola, despite the fact that the Haitian historical revisionists speak of the history of the Taínos and Spanish as their history when history of them begins 200 years later with the French bringing slaves to the western part of the island that was depopulated for the Spanish governor Osorio and then repopulated by France with the ancestors of the Haitians. ¡Viva la República Dominicana 🇩🇴!

[@slimmy478-6]

The new voice is ok however the old one was iconic Literally got goosebumps on the World war Videos Please bring him back thats the voice we all love

[@mateusgirotto6346]

3:50 you are actually wrong, all the documentation that we have today shows that Portugal knew about the brazilian territory and did not went there by a mistake, you can read the letter of Caminha wrote to the Portuguese king when they arrive in porto seguro he wrote about the land that they knew were in their side of the Tordesilhas deal. For many year in Brazil was told in the way that you said, but after researchers finds the letter of Caminha and many other documents it was Cleary that wasn't a mistake. Many people wrote that was a mistake because they want to show the discovery of Brazil as the day wich the Portuguese were safe after a bad expedition to justify the fact that the Portuguese took so long to colonize Brazil. It's a very common mistake, even in Brazil many people still believes in the old theory

[@albertodmajano]

The first video in entire youtube that recognizes the tries from spain to give laws to free and trate equally the indian and slaves, thank you

[@michaelmartin9022]

Remember when Mexicans were trying to say they were "there" for centuries / millennia before Americans a few years back? Yeah because people in that region in 1271 could speak Spanish and knew what a tortilla is.

[@CartoType]

Very good indeed. A historical narrative done as it should be, telling the story as it happened without moralising, and illustrating it well by maps.

[@tahahagar7664]

Damn you missed the opportunity to explain that when the Spanish were exploring Mexico westwords, they found what it seemed to them as an island. In Spanish folklore, there was a legenedary island called California, (named after its Queen Califia) which was rich of gold and pearls with Amazon-like women who fought besides Muslims. Her name echos that of a Muslim leader, i.e. Caliph. Then they explore this "island" which they then discover isn't really and island and it's actually a penninsula connected to mainland North America. 😁

[@mikespearwood3914]

Wow, never thought that the "calif" part of the word was connected to "caliph"!

[@abnerdoon4902]

@@mikespearwood3914 absolutely hilarious.

[@somebodykares1]

Sounds more like Baja-California which is a Mexican province, because California is not a peninsula but Baja-California is a peninsula.

[@danicule8671]

I love the "fog of war" as we call it in gaming, it makes the video much nicer

[@Ulexcool]

In gaming? It's a real military term kid. Do you think fucking Starcraft invented it? 🤣👌

[@Un_gars-5]

From a French-Canadian, we call the French and Indian war « The Conquest War », it’s funny to see that the name of a conflict only depand on which side you are on

[@mostlypotato6598]

I would love to see a version on Oceania!

[@basteqss8859]

One of the best meterials about colonization! Thanks a lot! ;)

[@ispeakasiplease]

One inaccuracy on the map...when France secretly gives Louisiana to Spain after the French and Indian War/Seven Year’s War...Spain received everything west of the Mississippi AND New Orleans (which sits on the eastern side of the MS river). Your map appears to show New Orleans as in the red (British) area. In fact New Orleans has NEVER been colonized by or controlled by the British at any point in its history.

[@TheLewisLegend]

That part of Louisiana was part of West Florida so it is accurate yes

[@janvisser4132]

not the only one, Suriname didn't become Dutch until 1667. The part of the second Anglo-Dutch war was pretty wrong altogether, the second Anglo-Dutch war was not favourable towards Britain, probably the worst one of the four Anglo-British wars.

[@DoctorDiab]

Please make more videos more frequently! I really love your videos

[@simpsonplays7296]

Just a reminder that the British didn't exist before 1707, so when you are talking about the British before then, you really mean the English. - A Scot

[@dazza2350]

He said English I thought

[@sdsd2e2321]

England and Scotland had been under a personal union since 1603. Act of union was just a formality

[@simpsonplays7296]

@@sdsd2e2321 They were still separate countries, like Canada and Australia. Same Monarch but different countries.

[@diospatrialibertadenkisque502]

This is a verry good remark

[@Wilderwolfman]

and remember the Louisiana territory was owned by spain.............. (it wasnt but oh well)

[@hagen.6489]

Second Anglo-Dutch war actually turned to the advantage of the Dutch. The exchange of New Amsterdam for Suriname was seen as a win for the Dutch, not a loss. It's modern day revisionism to consider US soil more valuable, since no tropical goods could be extracted.

[@jaztin7960]

True.

[@janvisser4132]

True. The Raid on the Medway is considered one of the Royal Navies worst defeats, so saying that that war was favourable to the British was ludicrous. I know there is dispute between the British and Dutch about who won which ones of the four Anglo-Dutch wars, the Dutch claiming the win of all first three, but even the British agree they didn't win the second one.

[@FallenLight0]

This video is biased by an english point of view

[@janvisser4132]

@@FallenLight0 It's not just biased. It's flat out wrong. Even the English themselves admit that they lost this war, the outcome of this war is not even contested. Not saying the English are humble or anything, they know they can always refer to the fourth Anglo-Dutch war, when they absolutely crushed the Dutch.

[@janvisser4132]

@@DrBreadstick most people are not great at history, not even their own. It's a shame, it's not just interesting, there is also a lot to learn from it. I always asks my fellow Dutchmen were the wealth of our country comes from. They never know, they always think of colonialism or the far east spice trade.

[@randomalien7746]

This is the best video I've seen on this subject. Great job!

[@IDDQDSound]

I prefer your own voice. Anyway best vid ever!

[@VideobyKB]

It’s crazy to think with how much of South East Asia was discovered by the 15th century, that Australia wasn’t discovered by the Europeans until the 17th century, and wasn’t colonised until the late 18th century. It’d be an interesting thought of how Australia would have developed differently if the north west was discovered first.

[@powervr]

because it was... :D by the portuguese.... so they got into east timor, and never went to australia... :D ok no SPICES that is why they never cared about australia... :D mollucas is better... it was in those days.

[@bruh5992]

@@powervr The Dutch Landed in Australia But didn't want it since it was just a wasteland.

[@armandosousa5535]

The Portuguese were the first to get to Australia, until the English spies get the information from the Portuguese side...

[@bconni2]

Southeast Asia was discovered by the Portuguese in the early 16th, not 15th century. and there's compelling evidence the Portuguese mapped the East coast of Australia over 100 years before the Dutch.

[@thepsychicexplorerpodcast]

Excellent video! Loved the blacked out areas and colour coding 👍

[@jamesfrost7465]

Good job. I like the view of the areas known and unknown. The color code of the countries involved. Straight to the point narration. Well done, A++

[@nguyenhuytuquan]

The colours are based on the EU 4 which possibly defined countries' colours as the dominant or signature ones on their flags

[@jamesfrost7465]

@@nguyenhuytuquan Hoy, thank you. I like how this video is showing the known areas vs the unknown. Incredible history lesson. Thank you again mate.