Fascinating that the target dornes are so kind to hold still and await the impact.
@aniksamiurrahman636511 ай бұрын
Since this video, Russian FPV drone strike has increased so much that it even replaced Artillery to some extent. Many says FPV drones are the next king of the battlefield. But it also shows how ineffective this system really is, contrary to what people in black coats sitting inside AC rooms claim.
@SMGJohn5 ай бұрын
Until you invent a machine gun with a f***ing camera on it that tracks and a small radar like I dunno, Sweden, North Korea and Japan has done for last 5 years. Then drones wont be much of an issue, a 12.7mm with proximity charge are real thing and can be mounted on basically any vehicle out there, or carried around by two guys.
@NikitaKyndtАй бұрын
This is more due to the fact that Russia has trouble keeping up with artillery munition (Ukraine has the same issues) than it has to do with the development of FPV drones. FPV drones will never replace artillery. People who say that have no clue about the enormous scale of use of artillery in that war.
@aniksamiurrahman6365Ай бұрын
@@NikitaKyndt Drones will never replace Artillery. The colab between these two systems is the new king of the field, not drone alone. If I someday see artillery sheels that are in part drones, I won't wonder.
@timmyj2366 Жыл бұрын
Johnny 5 is being sent to battle!!!😂
@PeterA650 Жыл бұрын
I can 100% guarantee you this is nowhere near the front lines in Ukraine. These things are designed for civilian law enforcement, not war zones. Anything large and stationary emitting a radio signal near the zero line will be destroyed along with its crew. PERIOD.
@NikitaKyndtАй бұрын
Yeah my thoughts exactly. It's stationary and it's essentially emitting a big loud signal yelling to everyone around "hey come get me, I'm here".
@mrbaywatch2110 ай бұрын
Welp… Ukraine just came out with drones that beat the jammers with offline AI targeting, the drone weapons race is getting interesting
@imyarek2 ай бұрын
You mean Russia? They did reveal it in 2022 and showed a working prototype but it's still in the research phase. It's called Izdeliye 53 or something like this. Never heard of a Ukrainian one, and it's still not in use 7 months later after your comment.
@mrbaywatch212 ай бұрын
@ I pray for you guys that one day you get rid of Putin and become a good country again. I hope you are well when all this is over friend.
@JamesAlis2 ай бұрын
@@mrbaywatch21 you mean nato controled putin
@deano4932 Жыл бұрын
It looks like Johnny 5
@Tricky117 Жыл бұрын
The optics look like Johnny 5 😅 Put it on a small tank tread base!
@davequinn2369 Жыл бұрын
My thoughts mate 'Johnny 5'
@markmcsharr8777 Жыл бұрын
Me to 😂
@Sombody123 Жыл бұрын
When the efficiency is "90%" but the enemy drone costs
@futtt_buckerson Жыл бұрын
Quite proud to see some Northern Irish people in these videos!
@nightjarflying Жыл бұрын
There is nobody from N Ireland in this video. How does someone from N Ireland make that mistake? Stephen Scott, Head of R&D (Defence) at MARSS Group, is Scottish.
@PavolFilek11 ай бұрын
USA lost war with Russia 2008 - 2024, 3 - 4 trillion s lost, 35 trillions dept. USD at collaps. German economy at collaps due to NORD STREAM destroyed by USA. Germans has no gas. Who will fund Ukraine war next 3 - 5 yeras ?
@Phil_AKA_ThundyUK Жыл бұрын
Johnny Number 5..... is Alive!
@bulgingbattery2050 Жыл бұрын
An autocannon with a fuzed round should easily shoot down lancets and FPV drones. But the APS might not be able to differentiate between an incoming hostile threat, or even just a bird for that matter..
@BalearicBeatnik Жыл бұрын
APs radar designed to look like Jonny 5, or is that just me ?!😅
@arth.4196 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding for Freedom 😊
@jeanclaudejunior Жыл бұрын
Ukraine needs that
@SCscoutguy Жыл бұрын
It is a Polish designed and built system and it has been used in Ukraine. She even said so in the video.
@Trve_Kvlt Жыл бұрын
Sounds like you didn't even try to watch the video.
@FreddyRangel85 Жыл бұрын
I've wondered about low-fi countermeasures when it comes to drones. There have been .22lr machine guns made in the past but didn't have military applications. But I bet a .22 will mess up a drone pretty good. And those guns are light, low recoil, and can dump a lot of rounds downrange. I bet handing 1-2 .22 machine guns per squad could be useful against drone threats
@astroinfinland66805 ай бұрын
The only downside is that hitting a small FPV drone that's flying towards you at +50mph is pretty difficult. Not impossible though
@FreddyRangel855 ай бұрын
@@astroinfinland6680 yeah those kamikaze drones can’t really be intercepted like that.
@astroinfinland66805 ай бұрын
@@FreddyRangel85 For Mavics and such that could actually work
@robeemedia2 ай бұрын
typical sales guy selling the newest refrigirator haha
@highlander723 Жыл бұрын
Oh my God Johnny 5 what have they done to you....
@bossybill7437 Жыл бұрын
IMHO, the APS system at 0:20 looks to be a Battalion level system; and likewise the MARSS system at about 1:50. APS seemed to NOT have hard-kill capability, only integration capability (ref 0:28). Seems to me that most all 'hard-kill effectors' would already have detection capabilities. The MARSS system looked quite massive at 1:50 but maybe it was actually a scaled up model? But apparently 4 kg and tube-launched, nonetheless. What actually is this? Simply a dart from a 'tube-launched targeting system'? A shotgun would provide dual-service. How about a grande launcher cartridge that shoots out bird shot or flechettes (like an upgraded shot gun)?
@maxwellrobertson4831 Жыл бұрын
I believe the MARSS you're looking at is the non-scaled down version. It was mentioned the infantry MARSS is a scaled down, man-portable variant, which I would presume is the much smaller but identically shaped drone right behind the bigger MARSS
@yoloninja4798 Жыл бұрын
johnny 5? is that you in the thumbnail?
@timlucas1432 ай бұрын
Now test it on a drone that is high performing and actually doing something other than hovering in place waiting to be detected / hit.
@lee40938 ай бұрын
Where is this guys location?putin ask!
@NikitaKyndtАй бұрын
Seems to me these systems focus on disrupting the connection between drone and operator. Thus making the drone uncontrollable and it would then crash to the ground or remain hovering harmmlessly and thus an easy target. What this will do is cause drone developers to make drones more independent and be able to engage targets without operator input. This means AI controlled target aquisition and engagement which is a direction that can have vast future implications.
@graveperil2169 Жыл бұрын
was that a BAE dig at the end?
@Gareth04100 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@jeevestherobot Жыл бұрын
Arun Arumugam .
@robchr Жыл бұрын
Is it me or does it look like the robot from short circuit?
@pierevojzola9737 Жыл бұрын
Hi, it all sounds like good news for some. But (there is always a but!) can the system tel “Friend from Foe?
@everypitchcounts4875 Жыл бұрын
So just like the L-MADIS & Coyote 2 interceptor drone, Silver Fox.
@Mitaeaaa Жыл бұрын
Is APS a British company? Just wondering
@milktoast4413 Жыл бұрын
Johnny 5 is a LIVE
@ittaaablir508 ай бұрын
Amazing
@charles-antoinegagne610929 күн бұрын
Bird passes by.. whoosh
@matthewfilmoe9899 Жыл бұрын
i am not top flapping that interceptor drone
@carloschirinos943611 ай бұрын
This thing looks like Johnny 5
@BarghestOne Жыл бұрын
Defence moguls don't like wearing poppies do they??
@nightjarflying Жыл бұрын
Did you thumb up your own comment? The clips are from the DSEI 23 'show' in London in the middle of September when nobody is wearing a poppy. I go to many defence exhibitions & I see poppies displayed by UK exhibitors in the appropriate month. The best way to prevent a war is to be prepared for war. Incidentally the "moguls" rarely go to such shows, they are elsewhere closing the deals that such shows generate.
@BarghestOne Жыл бұрын
@@nightjarflying No i didn't. You do know when you like your own comments on yt it doesn't actually show up for other people. You don't have a clue about how things on the internet work do you. And woth 0 context to when this was filmed how is one supposed to assume it wasn't an event that happened today or yesterday. Carry on being mad and angry you salty lil pepper.
@nightjarflying Жыл бұрын
@@BarghestOne You are incorrect about thumbs up so I guess, by your standard, it's YOU who doesn't "have a clue about how things work on the internet." None of what I've written exhibits "being mad and angry" so it's likely you are projecting your emotions onto me. BTW you have misspelled "light bearer" [Lucifer] as "lightbarer" [nothing] - I guess that was back in your beardless days a decade ago before you became a lupine shapeshifter in your head. LOL
@Robolaralobarar Жыл бұрын
Whats rhe catch? You would think these seriously would change the game but whats the catch ?
@nightjarflying Жыл бұрын
It uses radar therefore it can be detected & it [plus operators] can be destroyed - and will it work undercover? An acoustic & thermal system might be better because it's undetectably passive. Of course you still have the job of neutralising the drone in some way.
@PeterA650 Жыл бұрын
@@nightjarflying This is correct. All drones, whether DJI or FPV are constantly transmitting video signal and this is the right way to detect them and target them.
@nkolev4 ай бұрын
Overcomplicated and expensive. The Russian Nova Labs has a simpler, cheaper, and faster-resposne system!
@colp9492 Жыл бұрын
Johnny 5 is alive
@robbie_ Жыл бұрын
Sorry, if you've put a radar in a field, emitting a signal, everybody and their mum will know precisely where it is. It's a dumb idea.
@Fester_9 ай бұрын
In the near future signal blockers, drone disablers , may be commonly effective. How much money to invest in products that could become near obsolete overnight, like the all electric car ?
@timscott30277 ай бұрын
Like the electric car? EVs will be the most common cars soon. In 10 years you won't even be able to buy new petrol cars in a lot of countries. Also it depends how effective anti drone signal blockers are Vs costs. If it's cheaper to buy 100 drones only 1 needs to get through to destroy the jammer. No one knows for sure yet either way we will have to see how it plays out in conflicts.
@congdanhvo6629 ай бұрын
Can this machine stops 10 drones at the same time?
@andyfriederichsen6 ай бұрын
That isn't how drones are being used right now and it isn't like drone operators are invincible to aircraft or infantry. By the time swarm tactics get adopted and sub-par militaries get enough drones to use such tactics, there's going to be even better systems developed and in use. Hell, even shotguns and laser weapon systems or autocannons firing airburst and proximity fuse rounds can work.
@MichaelPelestano-it4ym2 ай бұрын
Look johnny 5 from short circuit 😅
@pliashmuldba Жыл бұрын
Thats nothing compared to Weibel radars.
@PortmanRd8 ай бұрын
90%? Hmm. We'll see.
@TK-ky5kh Жыл бұрын
Johnny 5 stay alive!
@thomascrowe34078 ай бұрын
Potatoe gun. First Defence. Make one. Also known as a utility gun!
@zinjanthropus322 Жыл бұрын
All these are Anduril copies.
@ingamgoduka57 Жыл бұрын
Lancet 3
@joshlolomo93854 ай бұрын
Useless
@joydebadhikari11 ай бұрын
@RuminatingStoner Жыл бұрын
So it can be countered with 10 drones? Keep developing
@Retrosicotte Жыл бұрын
Incorrect. 90% successful means across individual encounters of varying types.
@RuminatingStoner Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the correction. I misunderstood.@@Retrosicotte
@alanmcmillan6969 Жыл бұрын
This is a good rating, but Ukraine need 100% rating.
@NNN-p8w11 ай бұрын
sure . . . . 😂😂😂😂
@Papaghost8902Ай бұрын
Is Ukraine winning yet?
@lars90a4 ай бұрын
No use in war, even I can see this 👎
@larryy64676 күн бұрын
Selling to Ukraine and Russia
@mukenditshibangu66539 ай бұрын
FAKE.
@brightdaygaming5692 Жыл бұрын
so... the drone only has to move out of the way.
@Retrosicotte Жыл бұрын
Nope. Guided.
@brightdaygaming5692 Жыл бұрын
@@Retrosicotte it kinda seems outdated already imo
@jeffbenton6183 Жыл бұрын
@brightdaygaming5692 it looks faster and more agile than it's targets, so that might be tricky. Furthermore, it means that autonomous quadcoters are unlikely to be deployed, since giving them the degree of situational awareness required to dodge those thing would be expensive - only teleoperrated drones would stay viable. It can always turn around and take another try - it's not like a rocket-propelled missile where if you miss once, that's it. It uses the same power source as a typical quadcopter, but would be used defensively rather than offensively - so it's likely to be able to stay above the combat zone longer than its targets. Even if it doesn't score a kill after many tires, a drone operator having to keep directing the drone to stay out of the way of the that thing will not be able to complete the mission. It would have "supreasive" effect, even if it does not have destructive effect.
@Retrosicotte Жыл бұрын
@@brightdaygaming5692 If it seems that then you clearly havent' ever flown a drone in that environment.
@brightdaygaming5692 Жыл бұрын
@@Retrosicotte really.. i fly dji's i have both the mini and the mavic pro and have both my drones and my self registered with the caa, so you may want to take youre silly little assumptions elsewhere. i base my comment on that in ukraine they have shot tracked rockets already at them and due to the size/speed and air conditions like turbulence its hard to hit them in a real world scenario and it seems like there should be a better way like breaking the signal from operator to the drone or like the australian system the slinger. the cost effectiveness of this system doesnt compete with others the likes of the slinger. that is why it already seems outdated. not that you believe i have never flown a drone.
@markmcsharr8777 Жыл бұрын
Hey bozo
@jinlee2617 Жыл бұрын
UK needs to stop funding the war and divert that money into infrastructure built up when likes of China, Japan and South Korea boasts of bullet train when majority of English population haven't even seen one in their lifetime. Russia has already annexed Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts and UK and NATO is fighting a loosing battle. I see Afghanistan episode again with trillions lost in the time of 20 years.
@BBob1 Жыл бұрын
No we need to fund our defence. If we are weak then the likes of PooTin and Chairman Chink will take liberties. Who gives a flying Fig about a bullet train. 🛎 End.
@LondonSteveLee9 ай бұрын
The English population will hardly exist in 20 years time. They are dying out fast - replacement/displacement rates are astonishing.