Give Me My Money or Else

[@mclaybry]

These two Defendants have NO IDEA how to be a landlord. I'm so happy for the Plaintiff- she did everything correctly.

[@stephanielopez8358]

Yes! The continue to sound like complete idiots… but did she have the authority to use the security deposit as part of the rent?!… Well since you state the security deposit can’t be used as rent and there are no damages… Are you returning the money?! Idiots

[@bms0294]

Yes, they clearly need to take a course on being a landlord, because the judge took her time and explained it to them and they didn't want to accept her explanation and showed their greediness.

[@rocknurse100]

Those two were greedy AF. Good for plaintiff. They still got their rent from the other tenant’s deposit and they STILL want to keep plaintiffs deposit. They keep pulling sh*t like that they’re going to be in court a lot.

[@juliewhite8274]

@@rocknurse100 Omg! Exactly! Ugh! Greedy, GREEDY!

[@shannongrills7455]

I was hoping she would end up with double because the letter never went out with her departing about the deposit..that really would have pissex them off and taught them a lesson..

[@nancybez]

Ugh, two greedy adult children, feeling entitled their dad’s property. I don’t even understand how they can feel right to keep the deposit when they’re out almost zero.

[@princessrockman9528]

Sickening

[@burtonm3220]

I strongly suspect the defendants knew FULL WELL that the plaintiff had communicated with both the building manager and the father - they just wanted to keep the deposit. It seems quite unlikely to me that they did not at least communicate with the building manager. AND even if they didn't - they DID KNOW that the place got rented - and they were only out of pocket a couple hundred dollars. They should be grateful the place rented and they didn't lose any months. They should also be grateful that the tenant didn't decide to stay and just stop paying the full rent - they did not have to go through eviction proceedings.... either way - really ungrateful landlords. I hope karma catches up with them.

[@rocknurse100]

@@burtonm3220 It Will if they keep this sh*t up.

[@JoLOveS]

The male defendant is clueless and the female defendant was being vindictive. They will fight for the inheritance I guarantee it.

[@Rockydogdays]

Defendants

[@Channel-JJ]

@@Rockydogdays 👍

[@eloanakruger3352]

There was no male plaintiff, he was the defendant

[@Channel-JJ]

Rumor has it HBO is already in negotiations with them to broadcast it and Caesar's Palace wants to host it, they've already hyped it as "Sibling Smackdown at the Palace"

[@rocknurse100]

Two defendants are greedy and ignorant AF. They think everyone is as stupid as they actually are.

[@leebaird8181]

This case is frustrating. Even after JM’s explanation of the law, they still didn’t understand. They were lucky to have such a conscientious and respectful tenant.

[@AndukeMTGEDH]

These defendants are just crazy! They are out $200 and wanna keep EVERYTHING. INSANE

[@Channel-JJ]

They're both very thickheaded.

[@colleenknapp8626]

@@Channel-JJ and money-grubbing. 🤑🤑

[@sonjam314]

They chose to rent it out cheaper. So, in my opinion they shouldn’t be allowed to keep any money

[@rocknurse100]

Greedy and dumb.

[@traceyaz125]

And I don’t think they should have even got the $200! The father okayed her leaving early. He didn’t make the $200 a stipulation.

[@projectionv.accountability1010]

Go Plaintiff. Appropriately dressed, acts like a human with self-respect, well-spoken, no hoarder mess in the background, not a petty lawsuit. Refreshing.

[@payableondeath9091]

In the future I hope she learns how this family tried to play her

[@payableondeath9091]

@JustMemesum how you present yourself is everything

[@Anglynn74]

@@payableondeath9091 in person is what matters, always has

[@nancybez]

@JustMemes I think the OP meant background literally. No mess IN the background of the move out pictures. Lol.

[@celinas6261]

No hoarder mess in the background 😂😂😂😂😂😂 hahahahahgaga

[@manthony777]

The plaintiff did the right things. She deserved to win.

[@mysticaccy]

I think the dad is too old to remember what he agreed with the plaintiff

[@rachelharper3778]

There are way too many family members involved in the leasing of this apartment. WTF?

[@manthony777]

@@mysticaccy , 😀😊😄

[@manthony777]

@@rachelharper3778 , For real

[@payableondeath9091]

@@rachelharper3778 indeed red flag

[@shayhoff7064]

Defendants are exactly why renters hate landlords.

[@laurachahulski3857]

Not all landords are greedy and unethical.

[@tracykelly7731]

Yeah!!! So happy Ms Brown won! Base on all the actions she took; it’s a clear indication that’s she’s a very reasonable and responsible young lady! Best wishes to you Ms Brown !

[@jennylynx1869]

The question he asked at the end made zero sense. She PAID her portion! The roommate who was also liable , didn’t. They should not be landlords. They know nothing and are scammers

[@langstonwalker1618]

I’m a property manager and it’s a shame how this case played out. The tenant did the right things here. She communicated advance notice and attempted to make the landlord whole. Despite her roommates job loss she paid her portion, left the apartment in good condition, and took photos to help them get it shown/rented quickly. A lot of tenants would have been like “I’m out and that’s a you problem”. It’s even worse when you think this move out happened because of Covid through no fault of the roommate. It’s worse that the actual landlord isn’t in court. If they are letting him make decisions and run the business he should be there. These defendants have no business being landlords. They are just about collecting the money and don’t get their role. They also don’t understand the law or their leases. The two defendants are trying to manage the money rather than actually managing the business. Honest landlords don’t treat good tenants this way.

[@kimmccormack9905]

I think it's even worst that she had to pay the $200 they are out because they chose to rent it at a lower amount! Probably rented it to a friend at the lower rate, that's not a her problem!

[@brittanymark9213]

I have to agree. I’m surprised that the judge didn’t hassle them about their father or the ex not being there since THEY are the ones who did most of the negotiating with the tenant.

[@langstonwalker1618]

That’s fair,@@kimmccormack9905

[@butterflyinTRUTH7525]

The defendants truly are greedy

[@rocknurse100]

I hope they watched this and saw how bad they made themselves look and how stupid they sounded. The plaintiff was very honest and conscientious. These idiots were so blinded by $$$ they couldn’t appreciate what she did for them. Son at the end STILL wanting another thousand more dollars from the plaintiff for the other tenant even though they kept her deposit!!! Outrageous.

[@86bIDO52JF]

The lady defendant telling the plaintiff "it's not worth fighting" is so slimy and gross! I'm glad plaintiff won!

[@citytrees1752]

If it's not worth fighting for, why didn't the defendants just give it to her then?

[@cameronbolden5064]

@@citytrees1752 they thought she had no case because they had no idea what they were doing and prob didn’t think she knew any better

[@rocknurse100]

@@cameronbolden5064 Thought she was as stupid as they clearly are. 🤣🤣🤣

[@silvermillennial]

Yet if the roles were reversed, that Karen-ass defendant would sue for $20 if she felt wronged. It's hella convenient for her to proclaim it's not worth fighting when she's the one with the money on her side.

[@IHeArTrOcK20]

Shame on defendants trying to take advantage of this young girl who clearly did everything right during a hard time for everyone. I was also laid off during covid and so lucky to have been able to live off home and not put up with shady people trying to make a buck out of me

[@Channel-JJ]

be careful the real slim shady is always looking for people to make a buck off of 😂

[@martak991]

*woman Or young woman at least Not “young girl “

[@rocknurse100]

@@Channel-JJ Shady AF. Greedy AF, too. They better let Andrew handle things or they’ll keep getting sued (and fined). $$$$$

[@Channel-JJ]

@@rocknurse100 👍

[@angelmercy5261]

Technically the plaintiff and her roommate could have taken advantage of the no rent requirement the government enforced during Covid. Yes they would have owed later but very hard to collect!

[@prettyblkgyrl74]

When Judge Milan ignored the defendants question at the end, made her ruling and walked off the bench - YOU KNEW SHE WAS OVER IT. (It meaning the defendants and this case) 😂😂😂

[@princessrockman9528]

Plus his point was completely irrelevant. Do you see her roommate having an issue with it? They were just trying to get money any way they could. Talk about greedy and desperate

[@PhoenixForceTravelAgency]

@@princessrockman9528 exactly!!! I wish the judge would have asked if they made any effort to return the deposit to the roommate before the case 😂😂

[@rocknurse100]

I wish he would’ve gotten it in so I could see Judge M eviscerate him.

[@graduatge105]

Thank god the plaintiff had those text messages!

[@Channel-JJ]

I feel sorry for dad, I have a feeling he'll be put in a nursing home soon and these kids will be fighting each other over his property. The defendant's are so focused on money they can't see or understand the facts. I can believe the ex-husband/ property manager didn't tell the ex-wife I imagine he does his best to avoid her.

[@Dennismadeacomment]

And on the next case of The People's Court

[@nancybez]

It’s kind of telling that the dad kept the ex-son in law to be the property manager and the daughter left! Probably liked him better!

[@Channel-JJ]

@@Dennismadeacomment 👍

[@Channel-JJ]

@@nancybez 👍

[@Kayla-rd5jd]

i don’t get why the father isn’t mentally there enough to be in court but is to be dealing with tenants? surely, he should either not be dealing with tenants if he’s as bad as his kids claim and never communicated about his tenant leaving to them or he can stand with his kids in court at least. it’s so odd, the defendants are assholes and had a terrible attitude esp the woman either way

[@GummyBearWA]

Why do they continue to argue after the decision? They're not out any money and they get to keep the deposit. The only person out money is the plaintiff.

[@pchelloo]

@James: It's called the non-curable disease: *Greed*

[@JamieM470]

@@pchelloo Exactly. They didn't want to be made whole; they wanted to profit. Greedy and dishonest.

[@rocknurse100]

All they can see is $$$ in their pockets.

[@elvickRULES]

Well they get less money for appearing from the show if she wins.

[@annsayger5842]

The 2 siblings were never involved from the beginning. They tried so hard to be right after the fact. Now they know if dad & the ex can't run the business there is a personal situation. Good decision.

[@paolacontreras5760]

They get a tenant that paid her rent and kept the apartment maintained and they still wanted to be greedy. These are the landlords that deserve shitty tenants that stay months in a place without paying and leave the place trashed.

[@clifffischer4409]

Ya, and bring bedbugs in lol

[@moniqueengleman873]

Yes. Every single Landlord has tried to cheat me out of deposit. I had to take each one to court and won every single time.

[@buffymuffintopz8994]

Landlords swear they can do whatever they want I’m so happy for the plaintiff

[@prettyblkgyrl74]

The defendants are ignorant of the law. The plaintiff didn’t use her roommates portion of the security deposit for June’s rent. It was forfeited (by the roommate) when she didn’t pay her portion of the rent for June. What about that aren’t they understanding? 🙄 🤦🏾‍♀️

[@ValeryRG]

Seriously, simple as 1-2-3…defendants are ridiculous!!

[@joannasmith9833]

It was like talking to a brick wall. Nothing was getting through to them. 🙄

[@rocknurse100]

@@joannasmith9833 No they’re just worried about how much $ they can put in their own pockets.

[@LC-uz6em]

Didn't you find it funny that the defendants say their father's testimony wouldn't be reliable, but every time the father was mentioned they quoted their father. If he is incompetent to verify the plaintiff's version, how is he competent to verify their version?

[@rocknurse100]

The defendants were FOS.

[@williambuckner3680]

The defendants are such scumbags! I'm glad to see that nice plaintiff win! People are just rotten and greedy

[@barbarat5729]

I don't understand why landlords treat great tenants this way. I also now know I would have won my case whether I had shown up with all my documentation or not, as my landlord just decided he was keeping my deposit and never sent me anything stating why. Took me a year and a liein against him to get it, but it was hard earned money.

[@laviarray]

Why are these two trying so hard to nickel and dime the plaintiff out of money?

[@susangrosshans744]

Plaintiff did an excellent job. Parents should be very proud. Nice, dressed appropriately, no whining. Hope your future is excellent. 😊

[@lutherwhitley]

IMO, The landlord shouldn't have gotten the two hundred, it wasn't the plaintiffs fault that they rented the apt for the one hundred dollar decrease. The landlord should be responsible for the $200.

[@mexicanspec]

That was my thought. Since when does real estate go down in value?

[@dennisroldan6224]

Because the lease had an end date and the renter didn't pay the agreed upon amount all the way to that date . So landlord lost $200. Now if its after the lease end date than you would be correct.

[@lutherwhitley]

@@dennisroldan6224 Bullshit, the landlord is the one that rented it 100 dollars less than what he was getting, that's on him not the tenant.

[@99cachorro]

It wasn't worth fighting? Yes it was

[@c.c.2508]

His question at the end proves he doesn't get it. They need to sale the properties because they clearly have no understanding of landlord tenant law's.

[@rocknurse100]

Yes, because if they keep f-ing with tenants like this they’re going to keep getting sued.

[@newyorknewyork9790]

Plaintiff looks very honest. She was right.. Im glad she won.

[@damnnerves24]

These two defendants are cluelessness. They wanted to have their cake and eat it too! The daughter was trying to be combative and the Judge shut her down smooth!!

[@honestyisadyingvirtue]

Wow those two siblings do not need to be landlords. The judge gave clear and concise reasoning why they were only out $200 and the defendant still didn't get it in the end. Talk about being ignorant and greedy.

[@XFiorentti]

I'm a landlord and the judge is right. I don't understand why these two landlords don't get it. They've already been made whole. As a landlord I always strive to be fair. These two characters were just trying to take advantage of this tenant, who was kind enough to return the apartment in the same exact way it was rented to her. I wish I had tenants like her.

[@rachael1686]

The landlord stating that the Tennant can't use her room mates security for the portion of unused rent.. but quite okay keeping it himself despite no damages. He wants to apply the letter of the contract to her but not himself.

[@haleighcain9414]

She should’ve gotten double the ruling because they didn’t send the letter within 14 days saying why they aren’t paying her back. Happy she got what she did tho

[@sweet2sunshine]

That’s only for certain states. It’s also SOMETIMES only if it’s malicious intent according to a previous case

[@jesseleighmiddleton2111]

These defendants cannot be this dense....

[@chelsea7229]

Omg landlords are so greedy and disgusting.

[@benjie128]

They didn't want to return the plaintiff's security bc they felt the rent should be paid and not come from the security. Despite that the roommate's security could and did apply. But then I doubt they wouldve given the roommate her security back either. Despite that it was rented the following month. As the female defendant states, she didn't think the plaintiff deserved it. Plaintiff has permission to break the lease. Just because they have 4 people who have zero communication between each other to determine that is ludicrous.

[@vivianpatton5692]

Glad she WON. Those 2 have a lot to learn.

[@oodief88]

Why would she be obligated to pay her roommates rent?! They're just being ridiculous and need to work on the communication between themselves because it's obviously not the best.

[@diamond2241]

Right! And if they took the other roommate that got laid off to court they would be the first to say they kept the security deposit for June rent since there was no damages. Get your story straight 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@oodief88]

@@diamond2241 they're just ridiculous. I don't even think they should've been allowed to keep the $200. Renting it for less didn't have anything to do with her.

[@TravelingBibliophile]

They are both on the lease so they are jointly and severally liable for the entire rent. Landlords do this so that, if one of the roommate tenants drops the ball they can sue any or all of them collectively to recoup what is owed. While they can sue any/or all collectively they can only collect the sum owed once. That is why the plaintiff could technically be held accountable for the roommate’s half of rent, if the defendants didn’t have the roommate’s security deposit to apply to the June shortfall. You note they didn’t sue either of them for either the shortfall in the June rent, or the rents for July & August. Even though their own lease says the security deposits can’t be used for last month’s rent, that is exactly what they did with the roommate’s half since you notice they didn’t return it to the roommate. If they are going to hold the plaintiff to the no security can be applied to the rent then, in addition to sending a letter & cheque to the plaintiff outlining why they were keeping her deposit (minus what she said she would pay to offset their loss) they should have also sent a letter to the renter/roommate who left with a cheque for her security deposit back which, of course they didn’t do.

[@diamond2241]

@@TravelingBibliophile she can’t be liable for the rent if you are keeping the security deposit for the rent. Once they admitted they never returned the roommates security AND admitted there was no damages.. it was over for them. No leg left to stand on. They never even tried to sue the other roommate or mentioned being damaged by her departure. They were simply just being greedy. Case closed.

[@diamond2241]

@@oodief88 I agree and did not understand that either. If they would have chose to rent it for $1500 would she have had to pay $600 per month left of the lease. Why was that a cause of action? I work in property management and real estate so I’m going to have to look that up.

[@kurtcurtis2730]

I disagree with the 200. Why should the tenant be liable for changes in the rent? What if they raised the rent? Would the tenant be liable for that as well?

[@catherinesisk4369]

Are these 2 defendants really that dense? They admitted they thought they could get a windfall.

[@rocknurse100]

Yes.

[@WesleyLindsey]

Why did the landlord expect the paying roommate to pay for her roommate that bailed? lmao. Just give the girl her money back and go

[@oodief88]

Pure craziness.

[@popsinspace2565]

Landlords that don't know the law, and they get to keep the money on any feeling they have.

[@Tammohawk1]

Those two just couldn't grasp that both the Plaintiff and her roommate each paid a deposit.

[@therealshellywymer]

Landlord's who don't bother to research the law shouldnt be surprised when they lose.

[@brittanyjohnson7448]

I’m dying at the way Judge Milan dipped out when the defendant tried to ask a question 😭😭😭

[@inez879]

I can always tell who's a liar...these ppl are lying through their teeth which is why they don't want to perfectly capable father there

[@rocknurse100]

Or the actual property manager.

[@LadyWhiggy]

The defendants just didn't get what she was putting down. Greedy!

[@rezotydnic]

JM explained it very plainly. They were not out anything but the $100/month fir 2 months, because they kept the roommates security deposit. Dense.

[@diamond2241]

Then asked how was she able to use the money on the other roommates behalf.. how is she using money if she paid her half of rent for the month of June? They are truly greedy humans. Like someone else said.. they will definitely fight over the inheritance when the time comes.

[@mexicanspec]

I don't think the previous tenet should be responsible for that. They decided to rent it for less. Real estate does not go down in value.

[@rezotydnic]

@@mexicanspec agreed BUT she had a lease for a certain amount so she has to pay. But it does make me question why they rented for less.

[@arianefr78]

Sounds like the 90 year old landlord is more on the ball than the defendants...

[@davidewersphotography1013]

the male defendant is completely daft.

[@benjie128]

Either the dad is active in the renting business or he needs to let his kids handle it. But he gets in, muddles the waters by telling the tenant one thing and his kids another.

[@Fribee83]

I'm willing to believe that the dad did discuss things and it's why he wasn't present for the court case. Totally understand he's 92 but they easily could've had him appear to speak and say one way or the other.

[@bobberry1463]

You know what it sound like the father runs the show and trying to pass it to his kids. The kids are greedy and tried to keep the 1k for themselves

[@rocknurse100]

The defendants were FOS. They’re going to ruin a good thing with their absolute ignorance of the law. And greed.

[@karenwade8932]

The Plaintiff did everything correct.

[@lee-qz7bd]

They should have just let the father testify. Oh, yeah, because they were trying to be shady.

[@bellx7984]

These defendants are a joke trying to keep her deposit! They knew they owed her, and that is prob. why they decided to get POA over their father, so he wouldn't be the one coming to court and admitting he talked to the plaintiff! If he was able to talk and discuss things right before she moved, he can be in court!

[@rocknurse100]

These are the kind of kids who get parents declared incompetent so they can control their assets. Low down and greedy.

[@chuck9380]

They rented the apartment for 100 less and the woman left it better than she founded lol 😂 what a joke

[@billybbadmollyholly7927]

The un-painted place, that was finished by the tenants should have covered the $200.00 for labor to finish it! It seems strange that they rented the finished apartment for less?

[@biancalathetravelerssoul]

The defendants are so set that she was wrong that they will never get it or admit they were wrong!

[@RobKMusic]

They wouldn't let JM question their father because they know the old man would just blurt out the truth and blow their scheme... kind of like our current president.

[@loveyoutube2177]

Sounds like the dad is sharper then his kids. I am confused how the landlords don’t understand what the tenant and judge were saying. They were trying to double dip.

[@sunnyscott4876]

Her left eyebrow has a life of its own!

[@heehaw8401]

I’m watching PC on TV right now. Season 25 episode 22. Plaintiff and her son have matching fake eyebrows.

[@ladykws]

People are greedy af!

[@princessrockman9528]

Wow can you say GREEDY??! I am blown away by their “defense”. The plaintiff wanted to do the right thing and did everything she could to help and not leave them in the lurch yet they acted like she just tried to screw them over. Most landlords would LOVE a tenant like her. Yet he’s still arguing to the bitter end about her not getting the roommates permission when WHAT DOES IT MATTER? they should watch some of these cases of landlords who really did get screwed and count their blessings with this girl! They made themselves look awful and I’m glad they lost. Like someone else on here said bunch of greedy kids trying to get every penny of dads money.

[@tamekamccrayhayes6904]

Landlords are greedy as heck ! Senseless !

[@stephaniehowe0973]

If they rerented it for July? They have no loss Also if you dont send that letter in some States not only do you lose the right to keep it at all. Some States its Double & Triple

[@laurachahulski3857]

Yes - and it is very important for landlords and tenants to know their rights and the law.

[@PrettySure24]

They wanted to keep the security deposit for NO REASON?! 🤣😂.

[@narrowgate4229]

So leases will typically state if you break your lease you will forfeit your security deposit. However the fact in this matter is that the former tenant appeared to have been let out of her lease if a new resident was found, which one was. So they cant now say ok yes we will agree to let you out of your lease then turn around and not honor that. They played clueless, but I honestly think they didn't think she'd fight it.

[@jimh4167]

Real estate law should be a required class in Jr. High and then again in High School. Mandatory to pass with 3.0

[@LoriFoster]

Their story doesn’t add up. Seems like a good tenant, why keep her money?

[@pchelloo]

You-Go-Girl!!! Excellent presentation of your case. Bravissimo!!!!!👍 5🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟's

[@payableondeath9091]

I love her natural look and eye brows too

[@cbro2807]

Good for the plaintiff. She had a solid case. Those defendants are angry people. I still don't understand their reasoning.

[@dinogualandri7624]

It's hard to know if the defendants are stupid,greedy or both. Awesome plaintiff, from all appearances an upstanding human being ! Cute too ! Judge Milian did her usual great job, even when the defendants clearly didn't produce the father because it would have hurt their chances of stealing from the upstanding, outstanding tenant...I kinda want the defendants punished for their wrongdoing whether it be stupidity or more likely greed !

[@sonjam314]

I disagree that the landlords should get a dime. They chose to rent it out $100 cheaper. That was their choice. Is it going to go up to $2100 after the 2 months? Of course not….

[@baboytablo5735]

the dad wanted to have empathy while to kids say "NO, all for the MONEYYYYY!" amazing how they can not comprehend that the 1000 from the other room mate plus the plaintiffs 1100 equal 2100.

[@rocknurse100]

Blinded by $$$.

[@shellwilliams6306]

Another example that the "Landlord (s)" trying to keep $$$$$$$. God is watching 🙂

[@MRSWESTish]

Wow the defendants were still clueless after the verdict smh like the judge broke it down to them and yet he still had questions

[@PrettySure24]

And his question at the end was so damn stupid 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😩 they didn’t even try to get the deposit back to the roommate so either way they wanted to keep the money!!

[@Spankmepink]

Defendants are such scammers and they know it.

[@Channel-JJ]

They'll be scamming their father soon if they haven't already.

[@hanaj]

The defendants are either stupid or deliberately playing stupid. She paid her rent. Her roommate didn’t.

[@Dino23124]

Plaintiff LITERALLY shaved off her OWN eyebrow and painted on a new one with makeup. She’s nutty 🥜 🔩 🌰 🥜

[@donniee.2238]

Smh. These two grown kids can't communicate any better? They could have seen that agreement and not waste time in court.

[@talas4670]

Looks like one of the plaintiffs eyebrows flatlined during this case.

[@Tothemoon1994]

Money Hungry Defendants!!

[@peryole]

They should have had to pay the max under law.

[@keithkemp3008]

They are idiots and just don't get it ...they should get out of the rental business !!

[@Zera223]

Ok I'm bad with math but the defendants are terrible. He doesn't understand how she's not responsible for half when he kept the roommate's $1000 security deposit and the plaintiff paid $1100. She paid her half and I wish her verdict would've been doubled. I truly believe they were just being greedy.

[@christopherbako]

Harvey looks like Sid from Ice Age.

[@deloragooden8001]

The defendants are being ridiculous.

[@Channel-JJ]

a greedy Ken and Karen sibling duo

[@eloanakruger3352]

He still doesn’t get it, she’s not using the roommates $ because the roommates money he kept because she didn’t pay rent in June but the Plaintiff did!!!

[@Trich-nf2zf]

The defendants seem shady ijs. If u can't trust your dad to speak for himself how can u trust him when he says he didn't speak to her about her leaving. Mayb he has dementia

[@juanitacoleman7734]

The Daughter has an attitude problem

[@carriequintano2200]

These kids, are you doing business for their dad and know nothing

[@deshonebonyrowland-ward4552]

I imagine this is what Kim Kardashian could look and sound like if she ever passes the bar and decides to practice law lol.. That's no shade though because she had her stuff together... The defendants were wrong.. Period.

[@Two4yougames]

Those guys are absolutely clueless

[@lashundavis156]

Hope all my Pc family is having a great day..the landlord's daughter is something else she look like ahe walk around with a attitude all day

[@Channel-JJ]

You said it. I imagine if one looks hard enough she can be found on at least half a dozen "Karen" videos 😂

[@lashundavis156]

@@Channel-JJ 😂😂😂

[@jordanmt007]

They didn’t give her the letter. Correct me if I’m wrong but can’t she sue for double?

[@megansmith1382]

Also.... I actually wish that the judge slapped them with the no itemized list of any damages showing why they're keeping the security deposit in the 14 days!!! That is the type of case that she could have gotten it had the plaintiff asked for it. Darn it lol

[@imchababychafeelme]

I’m sorry I feel like this is pretty cut and dry? How are the defendants still confused? The plaintiff paid her rent and the other person didn’t,why should the plaintiff have to pay for that? Right?

[@robertlaschever3935]

Thick headed Landlords trying to make extra money. Shame.