Big Intel Core Ultra CPU Update…

[@GraphicallyChallenged]

Thanks to Vip-cdkdeals for sponsoring this video. 30% off code: GPC20 ▬ Windows 10 pro ($17):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/GPC20w10 ▬ Windows 11 pro($23):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20w11 ▬ Windows 10 home ($14):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20wh ▬ Office 2016($28):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20of16 ▬ Office 2019($47):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20off19 Thank you to Intel and Xidax for sending the Xidax X-6 PC for review! Buy the Xidax X-6 Gaming PC www.xidax.com/desktop/x-6 Buy the Intel Core Ultra 265K Amazon Affiliate Link: amzn.to/4gWOdhr Newegg Affiliate Link: howl.link/e7iwkz69gqcel Buy Kingston DDR5 www.kingston.com/en/company/press/article/74309

[@kor-cv9uz]

🏴‍☠ i'm good also, who cares about the gaming performance of a CPU?!

[@Matty-rn5gt]

So you simply have to buy Intel Ultra 7/9, perform a bunch of updates, then payout for DDR8400 of CUDIMM RAM and then overclock drawing more power and creating more heat, just to slightly beat a 2-year old X3D chip with DDR6000 ram that nominally pulls 88W of power? Amazing. Real progress.

[@chucklesdeclown8819]

@@Matty-rn5gt lmao

[@Dexion845]

lol when you put it that way 💀💀

[@lightest2385]

It like a car! You just doing some tuning!

[@nimaahmadi-s7o]

@@lightest2385 I never tune a car, it either runs well or it goes back

[@rafaelzigx]

Well, most of this is BS. The 285 is not a direct competitor to X3D chips. They compete against the non-X3d like 9950X. That's a correct comparison. Intel doesnt make special gaming CPUs like AMD does. So they will always lose. If you game only, go for X3D. If you also use your CPU for work, then check both 285 and 9950 so see what best fits you. These gaming benchs are just BS.

[@realdripmeister]

“so if you overclock the shit out of a 265K and use an experimental set of RAM it barely competes with a 9800X3D”

[@averagesnailgodpraiser3840]

@@rustyclark2356idk me and all my friends that have 14700k’s and 13700k’s have never had issues (I got 14700k cause had a 75% off deal for it making it a no-brainer)

[@Gamevet]

It's pretty much an Intel i5. The fact that it "barely competes with a 9800X3D" should be noticed.

[@tirkentube]

at half the price. it's also AI-ready, which might be important for the 50 series GPUs which will utilize neural rendering, something the NPUs on the Ultra series may help with. it should be noted also that for Zen 6, AMD is also planning to move to a similar architecture for their chips, in fact, they already have some out for laptops that are very similar to intel's ultra series chips. they call them Ryzen AI. they even have a similar naming scheme: such as Ryzen AI HX370 and HX375.

[@freedomearthmoon1]

AMD fandom takes a hit and starts crying

[@freedomearthmoon1]

Intel just dealt AMD a blow and you can't handle it

[@josifvissarionovich5320]

Great news for Intel CPUs. Hopefully no more degradation and or oxidation problems down the line. I'm really interested how this tile design versus chiplet design will play out. What an fascinating time we live in. When i bought my first PC one core was all you got.

[@LivelysReport]

I would have been even more interested in seeing this being done with the 285k rather then the 265k..

[@lostsoul029]

265k can't even touch the 7800x3d why that interested with the 285k? To see of hits the 7800x3d? Doubtful

[@TheBann90]

​​​@@lostsoul029cause it's 40%+ faster in cinebench... and when using the cores real potential, at least as good as AMDd 3d cpus in gaming.

[@clem9808]

Intel IGPUs about to dominate the handheld market. Respect to MSI for sticking with Intel arc

[@anhiirr]

windows still ruining that market....clearly the steam os has LARGELY proven for low/yield compute gpu power etc....that linux with a vulkan translator is the best MOVE for something with limited computing/graphics power or TDP ceilings. VULKAN api is a huge deal....and windows OS wont entail the performance implications vulkan/api offers to a wide range/library of titles on a portable.

[@nextlevelsimgaming]

Unfortunately not an ‘Apples for Apples’ comparison the Core Ultra 9 285k would have been the correct processor to compare.

[@tjthill]

285k price at newegg when I checked just now: $600. 7800X3D: $475. 265k: $380. So, you're not talking about price. cinebench r24? r23? not sure. Anyway, mt points per watt, 285k: 11.4, 265k: 11.9, 7800x3d: 16.2. So you're not talking about performance/watt. The core ultras are high-end midrange business chips, for gaming the gaming chips leave them for dead, for business/media/engineering use the core ultras leave the gaming chips for dead. No surprise there, but the thing is, AMD also makes business/media/engineering chips. The "right" 285k comparison would be the 9950x, they're neck-and-neck on price *and* performance. Well, except for gaming, the 9950x wins there. But for professional use? A 7980x that saves just 10min/day will pay for itself in less to much less than a year… and a 7980x blows by a 285k like it was standing still. Literally: it gets work done twice as fast. That's not any paltry 10min/day.

[@def-po8tu]

​@@tjthillim curious are u basing this off of old data or after the updates. Juat curious

[@tjthill]

What, that AMD also makes business/media/engineering consumer chips, which are the right chips to compare with Intel's business/media/engineering consumer chips? That was my point. If you think the 285k can beat the 9950x now, okay, thanks for making my point for me: right or wrong, that would be the right comparison for the 285k, not the ridiculous matchup against gaming chips being proposed here.

[@beowulf885]

my question is, who is playing at 720p

[@hovankaramanougiac4737]

Lol they are comparing in 720P bc it shows the biggest diffrance e because it focuses the demand on the cpu but still dont buy these intel chips they still aren't worth it...

[@backslide311]

@@hovankaramanougiac4737 mmmm yes they are. They're very good at everything. Not the best in gaming but that's it

[@beowulf885]

@ I have a 14700k. It works great. I got it for $340 to my door.

[@averagesnailgodpraiser3840]

@@hovankaramanougiac4737my 14700k performs great, I got it for after shipping $150 from Intel

[@jayplayer2004]

If it’s required to be 720p to see a difference then there is no difference for me if I’m playing at 1440p ?

[@Pr3tti]

720p was used for benchmark to ensure no GPU bottlenecking showing up to skew the results.

[@jonshaffer5793]

The AMD boys comparing a 375 dollar cpu with a 600 dollar cpu and call it a win. You guys are silly.

[@03chrisv]

Im waiting for Panther Lake, I think Intel will learn a lot from this and hopefully release a banger next year. It's not that Arrow Lake is bad, it's just that it's undercooked and requires a new standard of RAM to run at its best. I think with more time in the oven and built on the 18A node, we can expect much better power consumption levels and higher clocks with Panther Lake.

[@Matty-rn5gt]

@@03chrisv the winner should be us, the consumer. Competition is good!

[@lharsay]

The issue is not with the node or the cores, it's the chiplet design. Arrow Lake is destroying Ryzen in both single core and multicore, it falls apart in gaming due to latency and bandwidth issues.

[@AHOP-v9d]

@@lharsay YEAH THAT'S WHAT I'M THINKING

[@KitsuneKiera]

@@lharsay I don’t think it’s Bandwidth, from Chips and Cheeses analysis it has a way higher bandwidth interconnect that Infinity Fabric but is just so high latency.

[@chrisgoulet6621]

I got my ultra 7 265k from micro center for 229.99 on Black Friday one of their major bundle deals. Ended up getting that and a AsRock 890m riptide motherboard for 179.99. I’m a 32 year old I game and also use my computer for any content creation i use for social media from any family trips. I’ve always liked the multi thread performance of Intel. I feel like it’s not a bad cpu depending on the deal, right now the deals aren’t as good as they were before the holidays! Coming from a 13600F the performance gains are nice. I have a smaller build cause my desk is in our bedroom which something I’m not hearing much talked about is the power efficiency. Getting more performance as well as staying 13 degrees cooler than my prior cpu which is something that I think is huge. Are room in the house is in the attic that we redid so it’s the hottest room in the house. So the fact that I can play maxing everything out, and stay at a cool 39 degrees C is something I’ll take over the most power hungry maxing out fps cpu any day 😅

[@keagan5379]

That’s a really good deal, definitely worth it. I’ve been out of the loop for a few years but it definitely seems some crazy amd bias has brewed over the years. Even beyond CPUs as well, the cope I’ve seen for Radeon is just absurd.

[@anhiirr]

easily one of the best deals ive seen.....id also take a 265k deal/bundle over a 7600x3d of equivalent/microcenter value. I dont have time to validate what ppls opinions are "BASED" on 1080p benchmarks with a 4090 and near 500$ 9800x3d....that whole concept is so insubstantial to an actual end user/consumer experience.

[@ilmistico90]

I'm interested in the 265k Overclock setting and performance in games. Can you show us?

[@Accuaro]

Intel already said that their next gen CPU isn't using stacked cache, I mean they will but only for server. I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that buying in on the AM5 platform is the correct decision to make

[@anhiirr]

i have higher expectations for am5+ and higher ram speed support and fabric implementations over am5 personally before im willing to consider a 500$ range cpu again. The 5900x was nice sure....but i was just looking for something with more L cache talking zen3 launch/era. That was clearly not going to bottleneck my 2080ti the way zen2 was.....long story short i sold my 2080ti and got an MSRP 3070 founders and 5900x with the 2080 ti sale. I dont see too many opportunities to upgrade like that for a while XD.

[@ilmistico90]

Cache is not so great. Speed is more important. AMD needs to increase cache because it only uses 8 cores. Intel does not need to increase cache, they just need to increase speed and cores.

[@Accuaro]

​@ Cache is super important, as it's not hitting memory as much. CUDIMMS give decent gains for a reason, and the memory controller is on a separate tile. Make your cores as fast as you want, AMD can do the same thing with (along with cache). You can keep thinking that way, Intel will just keep falling.

[@ilmistico90]

@@Accuaro No, cores are limited and cannot be improved. As I already mentioned, they implement the 3d cache specifically for this reason. What you're saying is completely wrong. In fact, CUDDIMS are great for improving mhz speed.

[@Accuaro]

@ No, core design can improve the limiting factor is node advancement. Speed isn't the deciding factor on how good a gaming product is, as even a lower clocked and under volted 7800X3D demolished Intels's offerings. What you're saying is completely wrong. In fact, cache is great for improving performance in games. You will learn this, not just from the 5000 series, but the 7000, 9000 and AMDs next gen and gen after that.

[@AHOP-v9d]

REMEMBER KIDS, INTEL ULTRA CPUS REAL COMPETITIOR IS THE AMD'S X SERIES CPUS LIKE 9950X

[@_godsl4yer_]

The problem with the reviews comparing to the x3d chip is that nobody shows frame time graphs. Intel and even non x3d chips will always tend to be smoother to a certain degree and have more consistent frame times, even with lower fps. Its the only reason im hesitant to go for an X3D chip. What tends to happen is the X3D chips have much higher highs comparatively and so it skews the lows, yet if you have the whole frame time graph, you'd see that it is a much more variable experience. Now i understand that this is a claim in which needs proof, and I have the proof based on other peoples testing. The problem is that reviwers dont show these things and so im having a difficult time proving it to not be true as a trend with the X3D chips. Otherwise id be on it right now, its quite a problem especially when theres a fat premium on the cache chips. Average and 1% lows just arent enough to tell the whole story 🤷🏻‍♂️...

[@YasukeNakamoto]

I have a 265k with 7200MT 48GB ram and a 4070 super and its very slept on. Got the CPU for $299 no tax from Best Buy. Amazing price to performance, and its extremely snappy in everything not just gaming. Def slept on.

[@SkylineHero970]

I bought the intel i9 ultra 285k but I use it for gaming/workstation work. It has performed amazingly!

[@michaelthompson9798]

Hopefully we see an average of ~15% increase in performance as the lack of hyperthreading is impacting Intels CPUs in a number of titles. It’s amazing how Intel pushed hyperthreading, then had massive security issues / vulnerabilities with it, now is resorting to pre-hyperthreading style CPUs again …… but we do need intel to close the gap a bit, otherwise AMD will offer less next generation in their CPUs in terms of performance.

[@PoRRasturvaT]

It's not really the loss of HT the issue, it's that there is only 8 P cores, and the other threads got replaced by much slower Ecores. If they had taken the silicon space to get 12 P cores instead that could have been better. But they aimed for the max number of threads they could cram in there.

[@bryanrosenberg7695]

Let's go! Intel can finally compete in gaming against its own last gen processors! They're really gonna give themselves a run for their money! Great stuff! Keep up the good work!

[@thehavok4258]

Why are you comparing a 360 dollar cpu to a 640 dollar cpu?

[@DustyCruz]

😂😂😂😂

[@lharsay]

because the $360 CPU probably costs twice as much to make

[@qweasdzxc]

@@lharsay who cares how much it costs to make? are you the CEO of intel? as a customer we only care about how much it costs and 265K at $299 is a great deal.

[@lostsoul029]

Except a $400 cpu was in there and still killing the 265k.....

[@lostsoul029]

But using a comp from xidax also loses you performance

[@riosecco4142]

Everyone needs to remember that this is a new platform for Intel. I'm willing to bet the next-gen chips will be so much better. I've been a long-time fan of Xidax, ever since their iconic double helix water-cooled build. Honestly, I never pictured you as someone from Utah!

[@TheARguy15]

Guys...im gonna be the guinea pig here on this one. Just purchased an Aorus Pro Ice z890 board and the Newegg intel promo Core Ultra 7 265KF chip that comes with 2 free games. Curious what it can do and I'm only taking a $600'ish dollar risk here to see what the difference is between my current 10850K chip and this one. I'll let ya know what happens

[@lawshadow2011]

Man why the clickbait....Intel promised a "performance fix" somewhere in Jan this year it is still NOT out yet. This is pretty misleading title. Who plays at 720p? If you can afford a 265k or 285k those people most likely have a 1440p or 4k monitor/tv and there you will see a far smaller gap in fps compared to AMD chips. For me smooth gameplay is more important then jittery, stuttering gameplay who cares if a chip can do 500fps vs 400fps on Arrow Lake...Would love to see another review once the BIOS update is life from Intel and pls include 1440p and 4k fps numbers together with 720p or 1080p numbers this will give the viewer a better understanding.

[@Boofener]

the low resolution is to make sure gpu bottlenecks don't skew the numbers and put the full load on the cpu

[@GameOnBoy0228]

Overall if buy a ultra 7 265k or 7800x3d, Either way you won't regret..

[@Bass.Player]

I'm using a 265K 5.7 on 2P cores and 5.4 on 6P cores, 4.9 E cores. 8400 memory 65ns AIDA 132K read. R23 38400. This chip screams in normal work loads and is fast in the only game I play. 82C is top temp. Rock solid stable...No NGU or D2D overclock ... 4gigs on the ring...

[@Noone-iy7rk]

Which motherboard do u have ? Is there a way you can show me the motherboard settings? I want to set up a new system.

[@Bass.Player]

@@Noone-iy7rk MSI Tomahawk Z890, Setting are listed above and are dependent upon your memory choice.

[@Noone-iy7rk]

@ can you give me the ddr ram code?

[@Bass.Player]

@@Noone-iy7rk Ram Code? Never heard of that

[@Noone-iy7rk]

@@Bass.Player Ram brand and model number ☺

[@Reaper9-4]

my bet is 265k and that lineup is gonna get a big performance boost if games start to take advantage of NPU's in games

[@VeloRakic]

There's no way you could have gained that much FPS by just "Overclocking". By how much did you overclock it, 4 GHZ?

[@outlet6989]

Overclocking sounds like a good way to go. Voiding a warranty, not so good.

[@CrazyCranker]

I think the bigger picture, is it even worth the upgrade? If your on AM4 or Z790, you'll still have to pay the piper. I would say a big no!

[@Realmadridnewstt]

Hopefully intel will improve it further

[@VeysTheGreat]

really good video and I like the conclusion you came to the fact that there is still a lot of headroom for the new Core stuff shows that Intel has not been able to play their best cards yet personally still more interested in AMD CPUs not only for the reason you provided, but also for the upgradability, say if you don't want an X3D right away you are still off pretty well "only" buying a 7600 and upgrading to an X3D later when the prices are more reasonable as it is the same chipset

[@mikoldeon]

If only Arrow Lake didn't require new socket... One wonders, how long it's going to last?

[@AllenTsuna]

I'm looking to upgrade soon and I just want the best bang for my buck. I don't care much about brands etc or customer loyalty bullcrap. I also don't care much about the x3d chips because honestly.. aside from serious competitive gamers, who still games at 1080p in 2025? Most people now game at 4K which is dominated more so by the GPU than the CPU. I will not deny that the 9800x3D outvalues any current Intel CPU based on ALL specs however, since other areas such as temperature and power draw can be a serious thing to evaluate. Currently, due to shortages of the AMD x3d chips, and the fact that the 9900x is already a bit older than the core ultra series, if I were to upgrade right now, there's a good chance I'd go for the core ultra series, after sticking with AMD for 11 years. But maybe I'll just wait to see what AMD brings out next, depending on when that will be. Not really looking to wait till the end of 2025 or early 2026. Probably aiming to upgrade around summer this year.

[@shrymq9087]

The mainboard prices for this socket have just made me fall off my chair ... Oh dear.

[@69jinx]

so what is the point of the graphs at the beginning if i have to pause the video for each one to read it

[@Michael_Satrio]

720p for the test???

[@Loppy2u]

How many gens will this platform get, one and done or another cpu release?

[@alldecentnamestaken]

Curious to see what this would look like on a 285k.

[@Avrelivs_Gold]

It's not all about gaming. If you're not yet that rich for Threadrippers or Epycs to get the job done, any Intel is perfect bang for buck. You won't play games on high end AMDs anyway, while Intel is fine for both tasks and it won't be a big deal if it breaks down. The only major 1700 downside is cooling.

[@mikaelbiilmann6826]

...wait... Core 7 Ultra 265... is that like an i7 15700 cpu? I have been living under a rock.... and Intel and MD are trying to outdo each other with weird model names/numberings.

[@ployth9000]

talk about the 285k being $600+ and its back in stock.

[@STKReacts]

People don’t realize that people do other things on their PCs. If all you do is game go 8 core x3d…if not then go more cores because 8 cores sucks for content creation

[@cairnex4473]

So it's caught back up to the 14900k? Great performance increase Intel.

[@Delpzie]

I will be upgrading this summer to 9800x3d but this just shows how much intel gets hate for no reason amd fan boys are just way too delusional.

[@funkmasterkirk]

Hey, when you do your charts ... keep the INTEL / AMD at the same position throughout the slides ... Moving them around is not consistent when going through multiple slides and ALL the data has changed.

[@troyamaral46]

ok, why are we comparing the ultra 7 and not the ultra 9

[@majkosk8x]

@@troyamaral46 won't make much difference

[@Theworthsearcher]

And pricewise...

[@swapneelbehera260]

It wouldn't be much different atleast in gaming is what I think may be 3-4 fps here and there.

[@TheSchebbi]

you can't compare a business 24 core cpu to a 8 core gaming cpu lol

[@troyamaral46]

Lol, that’s funny. Sooooo why not compare the better cpu.

[@abaj006]

265k, when the RAM kit costs more than the CPU, enough said.

[@yuan.pingchen3056]

I want an i9-12900K with the AVX512 instruction set, just like the i9-12900K with the serial number V1341690 placed in front of the flower pot at the end of the film 10:07

[@PashaSlavaUkraine]

9800x3d, just bought and 4800 super. I c a n t! Wait 😬😬😬😬😬😬

[@ilovehotdogs125790]

Video starts at 3:10

[@v_s4459]

Thank you! I was thinking about buying a new Intel or AMD. I chose Intel, after all, it’s not just for gaming. Plus, AMD processors seem to get hot and have weird 1% lows in X3D. Intel seems more interesting, and the new architecture needs time for optimization. The last AMD I used was, I think, the FX6300, and it was a nightmare… no more AMD for me. As for socket updates, anyway, you build a new PC once every 5-6 years.

[@AHOP-v9d]

yeah now do a more adequate comparision between intel's ultra 9 285k to 9950x and see the differences in power consumption, temperatures and gaming performance ;)

[@derrick9903]

Ty for the Video can you make an overview or even a video about the 265k OC Profile/Settings. I try to overclock it multiple times but got several issues with instablities not related to temps so that i kind of have to stay on stock settings.

[@NotMrToast]

Why In 720p ?? Why not 1080p ?

[@sturmgewehr449]

to see bottleneck for cpu, not gpu

[@thehavok4258]

Both are irrelevant resolutions for high end.

[@n8spL8]

@@thehavok4258 unless you use dlss/fsr, and he is testing the CPU, not the system as a whole.

[@Eonymia]

@@thehavok4258 And you don't understand cpu reviews.

[@Ybshy]

AMD is already brewing a cpu that will keep intel at the bottom of the pile

[@N3gn4v]

Its so hard to understand that 265 is an i7 not an i5. Because i'm used to read number 6 as an i5.

[@louiienation8497]

Why is Intel always pushing their CPU’s to their limits just to keep up with AMD?? I hate to say it but buying a 9800X3D is a better bargain.. runs cooler, uses less wattage, and still wins

[@qwewer6]

Did you forget the 14900K?

[@TheRaunz]

Stop benchmarking arrow lake anything below 2k resolution, it does not scale down nor is ment to.

[@jltb5283]

I was going to upgrade to a 285K assuming it would be a nice uplift from my 14900K (still have the 14900k was building a new computer) but after seeing the benchmarks went with a 9800X3D. First AMD processer for me in over 10 years and so far I am very happy with it. Intel really needs to get their act together. They don't seem to care about gamers any more so they lost me as a customer.

[@jebes909090]

ya i was an intel guy and went with the 9800 too this time. we're at least good for a few years now. the only bummer is star citizen. amd sucks for it for some reason. intel with 8400 ram does like 400% better performance.

[@YasukeNakamoto]

i have a 265k and its amazing, 7200MT 48gb kit and it rips through everything while being very stable and cool

[@jltb5283]

@ The 265k and 285k are great for productivity but not so much for gameing. As soon I saw that FPS was generally lower the the previous gen 14900k it was a no go for me.

[@user-HAYMONjustregyoutuber99]

the peoblem i think about that is people think cpus are only made for gaming and forgot how much 13700K, 14700K, 265K.. BEATS the hell out of those X3D chips In content creation for less price while still giving more than decent price. Specially with lower price in my country for example. 9800X3D while it does have decent points in content creation its still killed by 13600K. Same content creation power. LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. At least in my country. Its 190$ Yet I know what people will reply to me. Yes not all of people care about video editing or those stuff. And the X3D chips will remain the BEST for gaming. [Also imo the 9900x and 9950x and even 7950x and their X3D equivalent is overpriced it just has good power draw.] I just HATE that the side of content creation being forgotten in cpu compares sometimes But hey. 7:17 ... see what I mean?

[@mhult5873]

Well, I don't create any content myself. I do use CPU-cores when e.g. compressing/uncompressing files and doing scans with Windows Defender. But my CPU mostly do work for gaming (1440P/4K) and also CPU-donation via the BOINC-program. I agree with you that the "X3D" - CPU:s are overpriced for my user-case and less performing in overal desktop usage. Br

[@ianwilson4286]

Why not compare AMD top to Intel top? How would AMD do against Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285K.

[@GraphicallyChallenged]

It wouldn’t change much.

[@ianwilson4286]

@@GraphicallyChallenged it may but you need to show it.

[@WayStedYou]

because they didnt send him one when he asked

[@ianwilson4286]

@@WayStedYou You make a good point but he should have shown that there was limited diffrence.

[@deags8975]

I'm going to assume you mean Space Marine 2 but just saying Warhammer 40K tells people nothing mate.....

[@evildarkeevildark5943]

Its still funy to see the 15 ish more fps for the 2x of the price .. the market are so F right now lol

[@MeisterBra]

Das Intel Update 0x114 ist nicht mal final daher macht dein Video keinen sin, Teil 2 des Updates kommt erst ende Januar laut Intel

[@MultiArthurT]

Umm 16gb of DDR5 RAM? WOW

[@Simhero]

Glad I got the 285k on launch day, it’s a multicore beast for simulation heavy games, and now it gets even better fps wise, 8 cores were never really an option for me after going to a 3900x in 2019, and the 285k completely destroys the 3900x in raw fps anyways, regardless if it is the literal best

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@Simhero man you just got a mediocre cpu.

[@03chrisv]

​@DsLmaNiaC The 285k is NOT a gaming CPU. It's a creator CPU. Compare the 285k to a 9800x3D in productivity workloads, the 9800x3D gets spanked.

[@alexrahardjazh]

@@03chrisv yup the comparison should with 9950x or 9950 x3d

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@03chrisv "The 285K is a creator cpu". The only thing that distinguishes it is the igpu, which helps with editing and the timeline, providing its codecs. You will never render with the cpu or the igpu, it's too slow and too costly. You will use your RTX 4090 or your discrete gpu, because it is way faster and does it using lower power consumption.. I have had a 13900K and a 14900K. The 13900k came up with all kinds of issues after a certain moment in its life when it started degrading. Intel did not accept responsibility for the issues of their processors until very late. So I changed almost everything (psu,ram,ssd) trying to see what was causing the blue screens and the restarts. I decided to trust them again and upgrade to a 14900k, applied all limits from the start. Same things in a lower degree happened with it because until Intel owned up the issue they had not launched a patch to decrease the voltage that was the thing causing the issue. Now I have to return this cpu too. From what I am hearing the new series still have issues and their motherboards will not support the next generation. They also have issues in gaming performance, so now please tell me, why should I be the beta tester and waste my money and my time on companies that do not respect their customers regardless of the name (Intel, AMD, Nvidia and so on)? Besides you can still get a 9950x3d which is the direct competitor to the 285K. I only mentioned the 9800x3d because it does great in multicore tests. Imagine what a 9950x3d can do.

[@Simhero]

@@03chrisv not sure what you mean, HUB showed in their big benchmark run, it’s about 5% slower than the 14900k, now with the updates it gets parity or even beats it, so suddenly something that is as fast as the last gaming flagship from intel is not meant for gaming?

[@EagerEagle65]

It’s 2025, we shouldn’t be talking about these things(720p)….

[@lopserdff]

Bruh people still use 720p in 2025 when they don't have 1080p in videos!

[@piranhax6466]

Isnt the 14900k a better performer?

[@nick-dogg]

Is there any way possible to do a benchmark at 1440p?

[@headlesschickenfarm]

Overclocking a chip that fails because it was clocked to high at launch? 🤔

[@rgstroud]

so why didn't you show the average game chart again with the OC I7???

[@Theworthsearcher]

So X3D chips use less power, and cheaper memory and a longer term supported AM5 socket...

[@waynetuttle6872]

So, right off the bat they paid you for all of this. Giving you a review sample is a world between buying you a 4000 dollar machine. Next, so you have to buy the overpriced core ultra, an overpriced motherboard, way tf overpriced CUDIMM ddr5 just to still not be as fast as last generation AMD. They are out of their minds.

[@n8spL8]

if only the usb 3.0 was plugged in..............

[@gregorymckenna6609]

I have used nothing but Intel since I started to build PC computers, at least 30 years. I decided to try the 9800X3D for my latest build (I only had to wait one day to get it). I do not regret it. Sorry intel but I don’t think I can recommend your processor s any more.

[@Martin_Hermann]

Only interested in the power draw and efficiency.

[@FULLSENDFC]

why 720p……

[@theonthompson762]

Well intel been losing there best engineers like crazy so their CPU’s just been shit after the 1200 series chips, the 1300 and 1400 series with their over heating and blowing is crazy now this 😩..now then intel gpu’s are looking good looking better than the cpu sector

[@konjiki240sx]

This would have been better with a 13900k to help answer the question does this update now surpass last gens best. Like others the expensive ram and oc is a little silly. I guess a good example of what you can get if you go full retard?

[@frankwong9486]

Return them and get AMD x3D , case closed

[@paulboyce8537]

Please do the test with INTEL ARC B580.

[@chenkov3967]

Would def not be overclocking anything from intel unless you want degrdation in 2 years or less.

[@SonyUSA]

If you don't want to spend money on a Windows 11 license key I have a very small Powershell command for you to run... 🤭

[@jeremynelson8496]

I've been running my 265k(bought for $215 new) for two days now. It's a ripper. We knew it was a good multicore chip but dam those oc results are outstanding. I know with intel the computer will just work and the idle wattage isn't going to rape my wall outlet.

[@Matty-rn5gt]

@@jeremynelson8496 haha “will just work”. Unfortunately as much as that used to be true, today with Intel it’s not a given.

[@WayStedYou]

my 9800x3 currently pulling an immense.... 12 watts at idle with this video open.

[@qweasdzxc]

@@WayStedYou it also cost you 3 times as much?

[@dasmcc8879]

Why no CUDIMM 8400 Mhz ?

[@Syron21]

Be careful, don´t make AMD Fanboys cry. lol

[@FireStarter23]

The gap between 1% lows and the average fps is bigger at the AMD CPUs. Did you turn off power monitoring of the GPU? Because that can cause the AMD CPUs to perform worse at the 1% lows.

[@robertbslee4209]

Intel should take the offer from China for buyout

[@Dazzxp]

Looking at the price of the CUDImms which costs as much s the Ultra 7 265K! lol Who the hell is going to spend more on their memory than their processor and that's for 48GB not even 64GB of memory!

[@FionatheFiend]

I always keep 2 PCs in my home, one from Intel and another from AMD. My AMD system has a 7950X3D and my Intel is new with a 285k. Both are awesome and very fast. I got the Intel system on day one but could not get a 285k until about 2 weeks ago due to it being sold out so I used a 265k as a stop gap. At the beginning it was really buggy and would always crash but now after many bios updates my Intel PC runs like a champion. I can't wait for the 5090 to come out. I'll need 2 copies for each of my PCs.

[@heroicsquirrel3195]

Youre going to buy 2 5090s?!

[@longaugust]

720?

[@Bishopheals74]

Thanks for your videos; they are very informative. I saw recently an MSI Unify board is used with 9000 ddr 5. It performs way higher than most gaming benchmarks with side-to-side comparison at 9800x3D. Just not sure to get that kind of performance one needs to get that board alone. I really like your thoughts on the following video. link kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3vRg5ycnM9mhtU

[@knofi7052]

Intel, no thanks! With a 13700 I had crashes all the time and other weired issues and their support wasn't very helpful at all!

[@100nakpvp2]

At least its something...

[@BigEightiesNewWave]

$225 i5 14600k FTW!!! Far Cry 6 4k TIED, BF 5 4K very close, encoding and encryption Intel WIN, CP 2077 1440P TIED!, CP 2077 4K TIED!, FORZA H5 4K TIED!, SM Remastered 1080p very close, SM Remastered 4k AMD by only 5 frames. AMD is hype, drinking cool-aide Gen 14 at 1/2 the price, much better overall, than AMD, unless you game at 720p.

[@69jinx]

yeah intel is still cooked lol

[@thehavok4258]

Amd's 640 dollar cpu isn't beating Intels 360 dollar cpu by that much.

[@69jinx]

@@thehavok4258 its beating it by a shit ton bro ur high af

[@MB-wq8cp]

Intel shit on amd at everything else

[@Skillsgoalss]

thanks for portuguese audio.