Harry vs the press & Oxfam attacks terfs - The Week in 60 Minutes | SpectatorTV

[@philiplong7390]

I am a gay man and I am 100% supportive of Helen Joyce. Her book is a must-read. Every time I hear her speak I feel more strongly aligned with her views. By the way, I do not feel marginalised or a victim.

[@kwoylee5617]

I really feel that the TQ+ movement has cynically hitched itself to the gains made by LGB people and are at risk of eroding support across the board. 'Pride', for example, was a single day of acknowledgement for gay folks. Now it's a month-long indoctrination fest that actively seems to sideline gay people!

[@marthamydear5869]

❤

[@janemacdonald3732]

Dear Philip, I'm glad you do not feel marginalised,I for once in my life do. As a straight female who has given this country 2 well-behaved tax paying law abiding citizens I now stand the chance of having to share a female locker roomwith a transgender person who identifies as female. This isn't what women's liberation fought for. In the late 50s through to the 90s women fought for equality with men. Since then it seems to ,e that the whole world has lost its collective mind and people can pick and choose what sex they identify as. And anyone who disagrees with this is likely to be physically or verbally publicly abused by men dress as women.

[@RIANAVENTER]

❤

[@benl5946]

Same

[@rjohn4143]

Helen Joyce speaks with such clarity and intellectual rigor - well done for having her on the show!

[@GodsOwnPrototype]

I would point out that the Suffragettes were actual violent terrorists that engaged in bombing, arson & acid attacks sending explosives to cabinet members, pioneering the letter bomb and blowing up the prime minister's personal private house as well as bombing Westminster Abbey & irevocably damaging the Stone of Scone which a bomb had been placed next to. Curiously all never mentioned.

[@cconcannon5145]

Agree, very impressive lady.

[@littleboots9800]

She worked for them for a few years.

[@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559]

​@littleboots9800 Don't you mean The Economist? I've never heard her say she worked for The Spectator, but she has spoken at length about working for The Economist until they granted her a leave of absence to write her book on gender identity ideology. She then left The Economist to work for Sex Matters.

[@fryliver4953]

@@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559 The Economist has been very good at pushing back against trans stuff in an evidence-based manner.

[@XKenny77]

It's always such a pleasure to listen to Helen Joyce, even when the topic is so consistently depressing and frustrating.

[@angelawest9759]

Disgusting strategy on the part of Oxfam. Thank goodness we have Helen Joyce and Kathleen Stock!

[@BobSmith-vo9hv]

I don't think Stock is much of an asset. Her views are so mild they effectively fall into a black hole of diffidence and disappear.

[@boscinet]

@@BobSmith-vo9hv Stock doesn't have a 'view' she simply states self-evident biological facts. This is now considered extreme not 'mild'.

[@zenocrate4040]

Do not neglect to mention Kellie-Jay Keene and 'Let Women Speak'.

[@moraymac2922]

@@BobSmith-vo9hv That’s exactly why her treatment by University of Sussex so shocking and disgraceful.

[@theolewis8948]

Well done Helen Joyce. It is a disgrace that Oxfam betray all the women who volunteer in their stores in this way.

[@therighthonsirdoug]

Helen Joyce is my heroine! She's brilliant.

[@alistaircroll1036]

Helen Joyce. No prisoners. She rocks !

[@loubieloujones5698]

She is very inspiring

[@louiseparker1915]

Love Helen Joyce. Such clarity, such intellect.

[@r.c.3614]

Helen is a breath of fresh air. Helen is a wonderful person and we would all benefit to listen to her, including people who wish they were another sex.

[@1habibbarri]

Thankyou Helen Joyce for clear thinking and clear speaking!

[@stevejhkhfda]

Helen Joyce really kicks ass

[@DoubleDowner]

The lady in the last segment was on fire. So good.

[@annetteannette9205]

Helen Joyce is amazing

[@annetteannette9205]

I should add if you haven't read her book TRANS When Ideology Meets Reality, I highly recommend it 😊

[@skymanifest8339]

She's also a brilliant mathamatican. Can a woman be any hotter?

[@rachelbassett4942]

Thank you the brilliant Helen Joyce x

[@Catherine-2008]

Nothing but respect for HJ!

[@wolfwind1]

I don't know who this interviewer is but she is excellent. Very interesting topics. Love Joyce and Shellenberger, and Frasier!

[@mrpickles680]

I love Helen Joyce.... Amazing woman

[@timkinss]

Helen Joyce's steadfast point about not bending over backwards to trans activism's manipulation is superb. It is only by being intimidated out of knowing that that is the bottom line that Oxfam's corporate packaged bigotry gets a pass from any adult person. Thankyou.

[@lighthouse6120]

Oxfam, noted in the Film "The Constant Gardener", indicating unethical behavior decades ago. Thank you Helen Joyce.

[@5lowburner]

Helen Joyce is my hero.

[@jacksonmiked]

Cindy is a terrific host.

[@acerrubrum5749]

❤ Helen Joyce

[@irenalovesart4064]

Helen joyce needs her own show

[@laogong52]

Helen Joyce well worth waiting for.

[@simonhill2668]

Thank you. High standards and quality discussions.

[@walker-xn3xe]

Brilliant interviewer & guests. Particularly Helen.

[@ny3683syr]

As soon as I finished watching this video, I Googled Oxfam, found their email address, and wrote them an email to let them know that their bigoted, anti female propaganda is unacceptable. I hope others who've seen this interview will do the same.

[@lindamason570]

Discussing this today with family and friends Oxfam will be losing a lot of donations.

[@LeslieAHF]

I learn something new each and every time I hear Helen Joyce speak.

[@doreenmusson4891]

Yes. The WHO should be ousted by a less political body for world health

[@rosemaryalles6043]

Michael and Helen were excellent. Great show. Thanks. ❤

[@joebaird5874]

One quarter of all of Oxfam's funding is spent on this instead of helping feed the starving.

[@JaneA544]

The salaries should be investigated too

[@davidleary5639]

Excellent show .Each segment was interesting, informative, and entertaining.

[@treesart6914]

Helen's tone has evolved to being directer and not pulling any punches. She's great.

[@workslob]

I stand with terfs everywhere boycott oxfam thats the answer

[@fionawestbury1148]

An alternative to the WHO. Yes!!! It's called the World Council for Health and they actually CARE about people and their health.

[@annduffy839]

Very interesting coverage, on all topics. Congratulations… 👍

[@christopherbrookfield4785]

Cindy Yu Rocks The Bells! Bling Her Up, All The Way To The Top Of The World! ❤❤❤

[@mikedee1771]

What the **** is Oxfam doing to think it should be getting involved in this debate.

[@JonnM]

I’ve donated to Oxfam in the past. I won’t be doing so in future. I will, of course, continue to donate to other charities in this space.

[@phylly5576]

I regularly read The Spectator. Good journalism. I did not know you were on KZbin. Good program. Subscribed and thank you!

[@tortolita633]

Snowden has done a great service pointing out the bureaucratic and systemic failure of the WHO. The UK should withdraw funding absolutely.

[@seakayak4425]

Thoughtful journalism is why I like the Spectator

[@macmachine]

Oxfam has accepted they've lost the over 60 conservative donation pool, so are going all out for the younger Woke one.

[@irenelancaster3242]

Helen Joyce brilliant.

[@marieparker3822]

What happened to Oxfam - and Amnesty International? They used to do such good work. Queer-Theory Activists have captured all our Institutions. It started with Gramsci, and continued with the Frankfurt School, Paulo Freire setting the agenda for Education, the French Postmodernists, American hangers-on who have an eye to the main chance like Robin DiAngelo and Ibrahim X Kandy (multimillionaires). Yuri Bezmenov warned us about the Long March through the Institutions on the road to the Maoist Utopia.

[@markabrahams2191]

The long march through Western institutions has been quietly going on for decades.Communists at the top gave up on their power to the people revolutions as the public realised there was no "power to the people" that ever happened.They have been inserting their people in positions of power and influence ever since.We really have a mixture of marxism dressed up as social justice with all it's identity groups and fascism of governments and corporations working together to oppress the public.Oxfam ,along with the UN and the WHO have turned into child abuse enablers.

[@raymondscat]

I agree with Christopher Snowdon. The WHO condemns Israel but puts N. Korea on the executive board.

[@doodlebrighton124]

Hmmm, me too broadly speaking. Although he was/is something of an advocate for vaccine mandates from what I recall...and I struggle to take anyone seriously who ever held that position.

[@js.3490]

Cindy! Welcome back! I have missed you! :)

[@pulmo1]

Helen Joyce's clarity sums it up.

[@Teasehirt]

Boycott Oxfam !!

[@lindalw1163]

"A life threatening injury"..by falling into a dogs food bowl in the middle of deliberately winding up his elder brother perhaps? 😂

[@simonrobinson1566]

Rishi's stance toward Biden (and frankly any foreign leader it would seem) is to beg to be liked. It's a national embarrassment.

[@marieparker3822]

The American Democrats have traditionally hated Britain.

[@elizabethjohnston3549]

He can't even make a man with dementia like him, I saw his interview and yes it was embarrassing

[@JaneA544]

Bidens trans rant is worse

[@johnmoorefilm]

Welcome back Cindy!❤❤

[@lorettatunnicliffe589]

The previous head of the WHO laid it out that those who are the biggest funders have their preferences. Sums it up very well

[@sisiphas]

Michael Shellenberger is spot on

[@sisiphas]

Totalitarian censorship is on the rise and is responsible for an entire generation of young people believing life on earth is doomed.

[@FlavioCotrimPinheiro]

👍 Great content. Excellent interviewer and interviewees. New The Spectator follower here.

[@woodrow60]

Well said Michael Shellenberger

[@colinelliott5629]

I'm sure Harry's lawyers are doing well, but suspect H&M calculated that the publishers would settle out of court rather than lose and have to pay damages plus Harry's costs. Given the time lag and quality of evidence so far, they may need to find another cow to milk soon, so expect more exploition of privacy, real and imagined.

[@andrewleonard9257]

Great episode! If the WHO was replaced by another organisation whose output was accepted just as uncritically as is currently the case, that organisation would be similarly woeful ... eventually. The fundamental problem is on the demand side, not the supply side.

[@EmeraldVideosNL]

Especially if Gates was involved as an investor

[@andrewleonard9257]

@@EmeraldVideosNL Private investors like Gates complicate the issue, because even though I'm calling the WHO the supply side, private investors must also be seen to be on the demand side, because "he who pays the piper calls the tune".

[@AdrianBobeica]

June 2023: Spectator discovers the Prince is a moron 😂

[@BN-hk6wf]

Prince Harry the ultimate hypocrite. Not giving a damn about the privacy of his former girlfriend. Thick as well as entitled.

[@mouseketeery]

Just confirmation of the previously strongly suspected.

[@sharonalbanese8084]

Great show!

[@markstrevett1284]

0.48: Sunak can't be on a State Visit Cindy, he is not head of state, although he is head of government. The King is head of state. In the US, Biden is both.

[@CarolMartin-xm1ri]

I'd love to hear more from these three.

[@johnmoorefilm]

Harry has forked-over millions of pounds to stage a courtroom drama in which he litigates the death of his mother. The ultimate rich man’s fantasy : the self-authored hagiography…

[@macmachine]

Nah. Harry's creating material for his new book.

[@jimrobcoyle]

The death of his mother should have been litigated.

[@JaneA544]

​@@jimrobcoyle against whom? The drunk driver, the speeding, the paparazzi, dodi fayed? Diana and not wearing her seat belt? It was a combination, a "perfect storm" and an ACCIDENT

[@Songbirdstress]

​@James Robert Coyle It was. Pap was acquitted.

[@TheKiddy3]

“We have to clamp down on conspiracy theories” says the Spectator host.. did I hear that right? The whole point is one man’s conspiracy theory may actually be 1. Opinion or belief so we should not be clamping down or 2. Being smeared as such by the government or it’s proxies..

[@markraymond9885]

I have now stopped going into our local Oxfam shop and will certainly never donate again who do they think they are.

[@marcbra5074]

Free speech in Australia is not hate speech. Symbolism represents historic events. Oz Attorney General proposing new laws & political opposition party saying he’s not gone far enough.

[@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559]

Because of the internet, it has never been easier for ordinary citizens to express their opinions publicly and to a large audience, and politicians HATE that, because some of our opinions relate to them. It's no wonder they want to silence us.

[@drew1784]

One of the better episodes

[@serene5986]

How was Harry hurt by these articles, he said he hafn't even read some of them at the time...

[@costeris35]

The tabloids didn’t know phone hacking was illegal? Give me a break.

[@ianphillips4044]

Whoever came up with the “Harry Alone” segment title: well done sir, well done indeed!

[@bentleycharles779]

Cindy is awesome.

[@davekenny8774]

As much as I'm not a fan of Harry I find it difficult to hear about press ethics from a former Sun journalist.

[@GodsOwnPrototype]

The Current British system should be much closer to the Old British system, which America inherited & enshrined.

[@angeld3500]

HAZ SHOULD BE SUED FOR WASTING COURTS TIME… BASED JUST BASED ON SUSPICION WIYH NO EVIDENCE… LEVISON INQUIRY HAS BEEN DONE..

[@TinaLennon-r7j]

My husband has cancer and went on the Macmillan cancer website and there is a bit chunk on their website about their support of LGBTQ whatever other letters. Apparently a man who dresses as a women might be offended and upset when the word prostate is mentioned. Am I stupid or any normal person would be devastated at being told they have cancer. Sickening.

[@ribbonsofnight]

This language happens a lot less to men though. Uterus haver much more likely than prostate haver.

[@elizabethjohnston3549]

Its funny that oxfam decide to under mine jkr and women in general who do they think donated and buy the things in their shop oxfam is finished

[@olympiahendrix4392]

Christopher Snowdon, great points. Thank you. Michael Shellenberger! great work on defending Free Speech but the idea of Americans thinking they have something worthwhile to export to other countries is simply frightening for now, considering history. Clean up your country and hope to become an ally other countries can trust in the future. You have exported enough for a while! Also, it disseminates an American historical fantasy: you came up with these concepts! For your information, millions of Europeans sacrificed their lives to achieve the rights the USA have done their best to mock around the world. Hardly a champion of democracy! Hit the history books America. Best of luck in your endeavor! Trust is gone about your country! It' has cut people's toes to sell them shorter shoes! Helen Joyce. You are wonderful and 100& correct! Thank you Spectator News: with that music I expect Doris Day to read the news!🤯

[@kriskalpa]

no more donations to Oxfam! I hope they cease activities.

[@angeld3500]

CAN THE JUDGE THROW OUT THIS CASE… BALANCE OF PROBABILITY IS NOT ON HAZ’S FAVOUR..IMO..

[@DD-ok2pt]

Yes it is. This are the same people who just paid his brother 1 million pounds in 2020.

[@angeld3500]

@@DD-ok2pt maybe William, had evidence and Harry didn’t.. this is an Elton and Hugh Grant’s crusade…

[@DD-ok2pt]

@@angeld3500 A key part of Harry's legal case against Mirror Group Newspapers relies on a precedent set by a court case involving a chimney sweep that took place 300 years ago. The 1722 trial of Armory v Delamirie involved an individual who found a metal piece of jewellery set with gems while cleaning a fireplace. When the chimney sweep had the item valued, a jeweller surreptitiously removed the gems - before handing back a number of empty metal sockets. The chimney sweep sued and a judge ruled that in the absence of the original gems, it must be assumed that the jewels were of the highest possible value that could fit the empty metal sockets. The legal ruling set a precedent that if the court can tell that evidence is missing, then the assumption should be that what is missing is of the highest possible value that would fit the hole. David Sherborne, Prince Harry's barrister, told the high court on Monday that the Mirror's mass-deletion of emails potentially relating to Harry's case was damning. He evoked the chimney sweep's case from 1722, arguing the judge should interpret the deletion of potential evidence as "inferences of unlawful activity" Sherborne evoked the same case in last year's Wagatha Christie libel trial between Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy. In that trial, he successfully argued that the loss of a mobile phone in the North Sea containing WhatsApp messages should be interpreted as an attempt to hide important evidence.

[@elizabethjohnston3549]

The trans have added the maps to the alphabet flag they cant deny they are after our kids ,and they can never undermine real women no matter what they call us

[@Matthias-q8e]

Terrific guests! Prince Harry has so much to be grateful for and yet focuses on his petty slights and the past. He is need of a private pursuit and to recognize his fortunate position and enjoy his children. Quite sad.

[@DD-ok2pt]

"Petty slights" they tried to un-alive his wife. If he doesn't stop this now they will do the same to his children.

[@brendatenorio5721]

British civil legal evidentiary requirements compared with American system seems not very robust and its a pity.

[@michellej1372]

The maternity leave policy at my work has removed the word mother. It makes it harder to read as I have to reread parts to see who they’re talking about.

[@viktoriakay1]

I wouldn't have thought the Spectator would take the line 'trans people are marginalised'. What is 'trans' exactly?

[@fainitesbarley2245]

And what precisely does ‘marginalised’ mean?

[@JaneA544]

They are certainly not marginalised as they virtually run every government dept, law, education, healthcare, through a disingenuous misinformation crowd called stonewall and in courts they get away with everything because they have the trans get out of jail free

[@ribbonsofnight]

Have they though. Giving Helen something to push back on does not mean it's their official position

[@cath.lamontagne5357]

❤ cindy Yu- love your accent! Excellent reportage. First time I listen and I will subscribe writing from Quebec, Canada.

[@yardengali]

What costs at free speech? What cost at people's health is a better question

[@richardlyon67]

"Their focus should be on the half of humanity ... women ... who are the innocent victims in these situations". For connoisseurs of feminist sexism and bigotry, Joyce's effortless discrimination against the innocent victims in these situations who are men, in deployment of an argument against bigotry, is exquisitely absurd.

[@serene5986]

Why is it fair enough that Harry can't bother to turn up due to his 2 year old's birthday. Seriously?

[@Gozzillacia]

This will cost Oxfam millions -- and the poorest of the poor will pay for their self-serving bourgeois wokery.

[@clovermark39]

Just one more woke company not to support.

[@lizs991]

SAY NO TO THE WHO...

[@amorosogombe9650]

They should change the leadership of the WHO and replace it with a more democratic inclined Director General.

[@martynspooner5822]

It doesn't help he is not the sharpest tool in the box.

[@littleboots9800]

Remember when the teachers were caught cheating to get him to pass some GCSEs? One of them was art.

[@delwynjenkins3581]

Harry is a numpty

[@ajeet490]

Harry's case must be costing the Mirror $ millions legal fees. to defend itself.

[@whitepanties2751]

John Moore - Yes, but under English law the winning party in a case like this is usually allowed to reclaim at least the majority of their legal costs from the loser. However, money judgments in the UK are not normally enforceable in the USA (or vice versa) so whether they can recover their costs from Prince Harry may depend on whether he still has sufficient assets in the UK. Unlikely they can seize Harry's mansion nor Meghan's jewels or designer silk knickers in California. However, there are potential legal means to prevent someone from moving assets currently in the UK out of the country to evade a court judgement, or to require someone resident abroad to provide security for their potential liability for their opponent's legal costs as a condition of being allowed to sue them in a UK court. I used to be a solicitor.

[@DD-ok2pt]

@@whitepanties2751 🤡

[@sheryldalton8965]

I'd like to hear what Harry thinks of the millions of peons that criticize them every day on social media..

[@lumpyfishgravy]

8:05 nailed it, Cindy! Harry doesn't walk down streets and Andrew doesn't sweat. Still not quite up to George III or Charles VI standards.

[@lizs991]

Oxfam just buried it's self I will never support them again this was the last nail in the coffin for this "charity" I have defended and supported them for years but this campaign is completely disgusting...

[@windsong2875]

If he was distressed because there was doubt about his biological father then he should be blaming his mother for putting him in that position I have a numerous affairs both before and after he was born, instead of trying to blame the press for it!

[@mikewinston8709]

Sunaks suits really are second class. Horrible ready to wear stuff that’s too small for him. Very silly.

[@saltburner2]

And it is not as though he were short of money - and those drainpipe trousers!!!

[@mikewinston8709]

@@saltburner2 the trousers and coat length (only potato’s wear jackets) really are a disgrace; too short, too narrow…He should be Savile Row for his suits.

[@JonathanRossRogers]

16:33 Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!