I screenshot everything for loading into my ECU. My combo is exactly like yours except it’s a hemi with 76s in a 4000# car, should work out great! Just a little humor for your Wednesday... 😂
@theholleyefiguy10 ай бұрын
LOL
@whyamihereg10 ай бұрын
Another great insight to more stuff I’ll mess with.
@CLEEPER110 ай бұрын
I done it on my ls3 and what I'm finding is on e my cruise and idle is now pulling a ton of fuel where it was pretty dialed on 93. Was staying -1 to -3% Now -20 to 25% but wot is still dialed
@andrewhiestand491710 ай бұрын
Would it be possible to do the same thing, only in reverse? I have my car dialed in on E85. Around my area it’s readily available. On Sick Summer last year we had trouble locating it a couple of times (in Iowa of all places….. and the ethanol content was crap) it would have been convenient to put 93 just to get to the next track.
@davidburke678510 ай бұрын
Also runs cooler on E85. Thanks Devin!
@GunniGST10 ай бұрын
At 6:33 , your math is off there, it adds 20% to the currently read value, so 120% of 36 is 43.2, ie 1.2 * 36, it´s not 36% + 20% = 56%
@tylertincher10 ай бұрын
Why use VE offset instead of fuel flow multiplier? Using a fuel flow multiplier will add to the cranking fuel and the acceleration enrichment values.
@MrRPF6610 ай бұрын
He probably has a long answer to why but the easy answer is because Devin told me to
@ryanbaker909010 ай бұрын
Solid info, thank you 🙏🏼
@jasonbrinegar675910 ай бұрын
Gee thanks Devin, now I want to add flex to my already over budget behind schedule build for 24. 🙃
@v8tergt65310 ай бұрын
Wondering what’s the thought behind offsetting the Ve table and also the target af?
@hectorgomez5025 ай бұрын
E85 usually likes richer targets at WOT so if you have an 11.5ish target for gas, youll want to offset that down in to the 10s for e85. You cant just add extra fuel to the table alone because closed loop will try to force it back to the gas target if not offset.
@v8tergt6535 ай бұрын
@@hectorgomez502 Appreciate the explanation, makes way more sense now.
@v8tergt6535 ай бұрын
@@hectorgomez502 So to not complicate things, the sensor reads in lambda, thats why even if you leave the same target af the Ve table needs to be adjusted so the E85 will get to set target af since its stoich is way lower than gas.
@hectorgomez5024 ай бұрын
@@v8tergt653 correct, sorry for the late reply.
@calhayward792110 ай бұрын
Haven’t had good luck with Holley and Flex fuel
@ericmiller428510 ай бұрын
36% VE plus 20% does not equal 56% VE.... its 43.2.
@JobSpetter10 ай бұрын
Why would you multiply the VE table by any amount? Changing the type of fuel used doesn't change cylinder filling (outside of a small percentage due to charge cooling), so the VE shouldn't change at all. Why wouldn't you just have the flex sensor change the stoich value of the fuel to what is currently being reported by the sensor? Then all the fueling math would work out without having VE numbers that aren't real.
@theholleyefiguy10 ай бұрын
Cause in holley software you cant offset the stoich value in an advanced table, so you need to offset ve. the only place the youll see wrong ve values will be in a log not on the fueling table. hence the reason i said to dial it in on 93