Maiden Horten IX, Erstflug der Horten IX V3, 420cm Wingspan. 2x JetCat P80, Weight 32 Kg. August 2012, Die Landung erfolgte mit eingefahrenem Fahrwerk und ohne Flaps.
Пікірлер: 59
@frro282 жыл бұрын
77 years later it still looks futuristic!
@yelleryoung5870 Жыл бұрын
What a wonderful aircraft.
@gunterbreitfeld64212 жыл бұрын
Das schwierigste ist da die Schränkung der Flügel, da es die Roll geschw. u.a. beeinflusst und hatten die Hortens nicht auch Störklappen eingebaut. Jedenfalls meisterhaft berechnet und nachgebaut. 👍
@stumac8692 жыл бұрын
Imagine seeing one of those flying around during the war, you'd have thought aliens were invading.
@rangermcq68022 жыл бұрын
That was great! Thank you gentlemen.
@kampfkater8503 Жыл бұрын
Ganz Klasse! Ich bewundere euch Modellbauer. Bei Modell-Flugtagen in Oberseifersdorf bin ich immer dabei!
@neboskii87562 жыл бұрын
It's cool how a plane can still be maneuverable with multipurpose ailerons only its just the controls are different and the internal systems are different
@stevenheller19853 жыл бұрын
Wow Respekt
@reineroel7710 жыл бұрын
Klasse gemacht
@adamgardiner58692 жыл бұрын
Tiny 1/12 scale England was looking very nervous when this took off.
@SpaceTravel17762 жыл бұрын
Eh, it wasn’t enough to stop the 1/12 scale Russian army so doesn’t matter anyway.
@steffenrosmus91772 жыл бұрын
@@SpaceTravel1776 without lend and lease the Red Army would have been nothing.
@MrAviatorr10 жыл бұрын
i hoff i gseh das tolle projekt mol live super sach Fred
@Zhonguoria2 жыл бұрын
Schöne flugzeug
@leokimvideo2 жыл бұрын
Incredible how advanced Germany was with aircraft designs during WW2, decades ahead of any other country.
@themechbuilder61712 жыл бұрын
indeed
@bobmetcalfe96402 жыл бұрын
Not so much in engine design though.
@themechbuilder61712 жыл бұрын
@@bobmetcalfe9640 they had JET ENGINES! no one had those right?
@bobmetcalfe96402 жыл бұрын
@@themechbuilder6171 Er ... In fact yes, the British and German jet engines were developed at roughly the same time, but the British jet engines were far more reliable than the German ones by 1945 anyway.The British had operational jet fighters, (The Gloster Meteor} but they were not allowed to fly over Germany in case they fell into German hands, although it wouldn't have mattered at that stage.
@Slo-ryde Жыл бұрын
Luckily all these weapons came out too late in the war for the Nazis….Hitler put the cart ahead of the horse.
@marienfeld07 Жыл бұрын
Beeindruckend und wunderbar, nur in Deutschland. Es sieht aus wie ein aktualisierter Jäger.
@Bayan19052 жыл бұрын
I would like to see a larger scale RC like this tested to see kind of radar signature it has, to see if it really was the first stealth aircraft.
@atomicskull64052 жыл бұрын
They don't need to computer modeling would do a much better job of that.
@Murphy5-52 жыл бұрын
Northrup Grumman did build a 1:1 dummy and actually tested the remains of the original prototype and it is infact much harder to detect by radar than any other plane from that era. I don't know the radar signature but they compared it to getting detected 2:30 minutes before reaching britain oposed to the 19 minutes of the actual planes that fought in the battle of britain
@georgechristoforou9912 жыл бұрын
It wasn't stealth by design. It was only stealth by lack of metal to build planes at the end of the war.
@Murphy5-52 жыл бұрын
@@georgechristoforou991 Infact it was, they used carbon between the wood layers to refract the radar waves
@TinyBearTim2 жыл бұрын
It was it had a smaller radar because it’s a flying wing
@johnutting96152 жыл бұрын
Great attempt,just the landing gear to have fully operational
@norberthofer5830 Жыл бұрын
Super cool
@geoffballe8766 Жыл бұрын
Excellent
@mickcarson85043 жыл бұрын
What happened to the wheels?
@pascalfust10352 жыл бұрын
Ohne Seitenruder muss das Flugzeug aerodynamisch perfekt konstruiert sein - ich hoffe, dass dies die einzige Bauchlandung dieses schönen Modells geblieben ist
@davidmyhrahistorian7 жыл бұрын
Gothaer Waggonfabrik was bombed twice in 1944 by the USAAF's 8th Air Force B-17s and B-24s. First in February 1944 and then again in July 1944. So after it was bombed back to the stone age where were the Ho 229's built? Evidence shows that the three prototypes were built in one of Dr.-Ing. SS General Hans Kammler's caves and that he canceled the entire Horten project on 17 March 1945. There was never a Gotha Go 229. Check it out.
@porterfred7 жыл бұрын
Hi David, Thank you for your comment. I belive the same that the GO229 was never a project name of this plane. But many documentation name the Horten IX as GO 229. This title are only because to have this name also in the youtube search string.
@andik8592 жыл бұрын
Die Prototypen wurden in den Hallen der Göttinger Autobahnmeisterei gebaut.
@valiantthori8245 Жыл бұрын
Yes David, we checked it out. After your heroic pilots made their excellent job bombing Germany - especially the centers of all german cities - "back to the stone age" there was nothing. Never. There were never the best tanks of the world, there were no Type 21 U-boats, never A9 up to A15 rockets, of course there was never an atomic bomb, no nuclear reactor, no flying discs, no gigantic underground-facilities where american soldiers never put even one step inside - until TODAY. And they never will. And so on.... Yes, dear american buddy David, all that NEVER happened. - Last notice: Ho IX and Go 229 means the same warplane. Check it out. The next Horten-plane they worked at was the Ho 18 AMERICA-bomber. Lucky United States. This of course never happened too.
@frankhernandez68834 жыл бұрын
]3eautiful
@wolfganggugelweith87602 жыл бұрын
Mann! Wenn das der dicke Hermann wüsste oder sooooo!!! 👆👆👆👆👆
@hanskurtmann67812 жыл бұрын
Well its how the yanks made the B2.
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu5 жыл бұрын
3-D print that for a drone, only with turbo props. 😜
@CarlosFuentes-fk8md5 жыл бұрын
Problemas con el tren de aterrizaje
@escanor24053 жыл бұрын
Schöne ackerlandung^^
@SuperTrumpMAGA Жыл бұрын
German Engineering !!!!😀
@user-vb1tz4li7l2 жыл бұрын
Что, при посадке у него шасси не вышли и поэтому сел на брюхо?
@reconforsales7708 Жыл бұрын
What possessed these builders to make such an ugly plane- no wonder the sightings of UFOs has increased.
@vitorhorter33073 жыл бұрын
Design hihspeed
@benediktolgun26908 жыл бұрын
sieht nicht wirklich aus wie das original..
@Tbonyandsteak2 жыл бұрын
Bad balancing, others had done it better
@marcysss936 жыл бұрын
Amerikabomber
@in12135 жыл бұрын
marcysiek schönes Flugzeug, aber Krieg ist ein Verbrechen. Übrigens, wenn der Krieg etwas länger gedauert hätte, wären die Atombomben hier runtergekommen.
@sachse_8555 жыл бұрын
Ney ney das haben die Nazis damals 1945 schon gehabt. Die scheiß Amy haben es nur kopiert. Wäre dieses Flugzeug in Serie gegangen hätten die Nazis eine Megawaffe gegen die Engländer gehabt. Es war auch in Plan noch ein größeren Typen zu bauen und ihn mit Atombomben zu bestücken die über New York abgeworfen hätte können. Also nix Amerikabomber. Diese Pisser können nur kopieren mehr nicht.
@Marco187Polo3 жыл бұрын
Deutscher Patriot Die Horten 18, eine größere Version der Horten 9 wurde Amerikanomber genannt, weil der Amerika bombardieren sollte. Deswegen hieß er Amerikabomber und nicht weil die Amis Nurflügler-Bomber haben.
@georgechristoforou9912 жыл бұрын
The RQ-170 Sentinel
@wilfriedhaas41272 жыл бұрын
@@in1213 tja, siehst Du, und hätten wir die Horten 3 Jahre früher gehabt hätte sich kein Amibomber mehr hergetraut, aber was soll die Diskussion? Aber vielleicht findest Du B17 Modelle besser, weil die das mit Flüchtlingen vollgestopfte Dresden abgefackelt haben,, obwohl dieses bekannt war. Verschon die Leute doch mit deinen Belehrungen.