Humbert's Funny Moments - Lolita 1997

[@angelaestrada7026]

"My magic fingers aren't enough?" I love that lineeee❤️ HAHAH

[@iim4xii129]

Delete that shit

[@danielajazminiturraldequin4088]

That’s disgusting considering she was a minor. I can’t believe how people do not realize he was a pederast.

[@sunastra]

girl ew you understand that this line is creepy as hell (as it’s supposed to be) right?

[@maxsiqueira666]

sameee

[@Lunafroyo]

He’s creepy as hell.

[@dimitroulak.5295]

The fantastic director, Stanley Kubrick, had said that Dominique Swain (Lolita) would spontaneously add her own little touches here and there in many scenes. I believe the slapping here was was meticulously improvised.

[@welovejeremyirons]

Good touches from her. Thank you. We didn't know it.

[@Sueuhevffbcjjidis]

@@welovejeremyirons are you actually Jeremy irons

[@welovejeremyirons]

@@Sueuhevffbcjjidis No but this channel is for his fans and we are one of them.

[@bianchiiii3806]

this version was directed by Adrian Lyne. The earlier version was directed by Kubrick. ;)

[@urlittlewindmill]

Kubrick didn’t direct this movie

[@sukitang5486]

Jeremy lrons you're handsome and gentlemanlike 😍

[@fabi1868]

Ti amo Jeremy

[@alparslanyusuf369]

Is Charlotte Haze Lolita's mother?

[@welovejeremyirons]

Yes

[@kyletroknya2419]

The person who played her looks nice

[@fabi1868]

Beata lolita!

[@ErzsebetSne-bg1dk]

Nagyon mérges vagyok. Ma megvettem az Éjféli gyors Liszabonba című könyvet, aminek címlapján nem Jeremy Irons szerepel, hanem egy ismeretlen valaki. Azt gondolom a művész úrat illette volna meg ez a hely. Biztosan van erre magyarázat, de ha nem tudták megoldani, hogy a film főszereplője legyen a könyv elején, akkor inkább senkit sem kellett volna szerepeltetni rajta.

[@alparslanyusuf369]

Why does Lolita getting Angry 😠 😡 with Humbert in this Video?

[@welovejeremyirons]

Not angry, just annoyed.

[@Ollivu23]

Because he was her abuser..

[@kyletroknya2419]

@@Ollivu23 True

[@dontevenbruh]

@@Ollivu23not in the movie, she wanted it

[@ananyanyan]

​@@dontevenbruh She was a child, and Humbert is an unreliable narrator. She saw him as a father, and she's naturally bratty and flamboyant. Like a little kid.

[@melindamassey14]

What a horrible movie!!

[@sunastra]

Idk if you’re saying that it’s a horrible movie bc it’s disgusting but if that’s the case, know that it is the whole point of it! When you understand the whole story, it makes both the book and the movie a genius portrayal of the mind of a p*dophile and how he manipulates and abuses his victim (the book shows it way better tho since the movie is a little harder to interpret) So I suggest you to read the book to better understand Lolita. Humbert was for no doubt an abuser and an unreliable narrator and everything we see is from his point of view. He makes himself the victim and tries to convince us (the readers) that he is a good man who was also manipulated. I know many people say that Lolita is a "love story" and it literally pisses me off because it's certainly not. More like a horror story.

[@joeallfrontsquiet8797]

Ignoramus, read the book.

[@ananyanyan]

Horrible characters, sickening story, captured well. If you feel disgusted the movie did its job well

[@lovmalov4053]

If i were lolita i would always beside mr.humbert. of course im in love with him ....... i hate the ending

[@Ollivu23]

WHATTA FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU

[@yonipwr]

She’s a child. What the fuck.

[@Lynxiel]

WTF is wrong w u

[@xolio1993]

That’s disturbing, she was molested. The film is seen very beautiful, I can’t deny that, because it’s from a paedophile’s (Humbert) perspective … she didn’t initiate anything

[@stephanierose4970]

Hey so this is insane