I love your videos!! I am picking up Calculus to do my Masters soon. By the way, at around 7:32, shouldn't the whole thing be multiplied by xy / x^y in the numerator AND the denominator? Because at 7:32, I think you accidentally wrote the multiplying denominator as y^y instead of x^y. (I.e. xy / y^y when it should be xy / x^y)
@bprpcalculusbasics2 ай бұрын
Yes you are right. Thanks for pointing that out!
@NoisyKoel2 ай бұрын
@bprpcalculusbasics my pleasure!! 😁 Thank you for your thorough lessons!! 😃
@markcbaker2 ай бұрын
Why not simplify to y*ln x = x*ln y before implicit differentiation
@stupidteous2 ай бұрын
he did simplify in the last video. he was just showing how it could be done the other way to clear up the viewer's question at the beginning. it should be simplified though.
@mtaur41132 ай бұрын
I am also wondering if lny/y = lnx/x has nontrivial solution. y=x is a solution curve. But there is another one, G(t)=ln(t)/t has a maximum at t=e and has pairs of positive values for t_1>e and 1
@giovannimariatanda92512 ай бұрын
Bravo @markcbaker. Pure io penso sia più semplice e forse più elegante fare come dici. Così ho infatti proceduto in prima istanza. Ad ogni modo onore anche a BRP per il suo prezioso contributo. Virtute duce, comite fortuna hostes vicisti. (Cicero)
@stupidteous2 ай бұрын
@@mtaur4113 i think he did make a video on it, x^y = y^x
@intothedarkness62422 ай бұрын
same,i ended up with lny - yx^-1 / lnx - xy^-1
@chakwowu68252 ай бұрын
I like the X'mas tree behind you.
@profjaildervicente2 ай бұрын
Parabéns, muito bom o seu conteúdo...
@issssse2 ай бұрын
Some series approach infinity pretty quickly, and some very slowly 🐌 (just watched your harmonic series video). But which series approach infinity the slowest? Love the videos ❤
@henkhu1002 ай бұрын
You first have to find out that y is a differentiable function of x if x^y=y^x before you can use the expression dy/dx See also an earlier reaction that there are two values for y if x=2
@chaosredefined38342 ай бұрын
That's not a problem. We can also use this approach to find the derivative of a circle (x^2 + y^2 = r^2), despite the fact that, for any x such that -r < x < r, there will be two values of y that work. Things get a bit loose when working with derivates.
@TheEternalVortex422 ай бұрын
Look up the implicit function theorem. It guarantees we can write this function as differentiable y = f(x) or x = g(y) everywhere.
@henkhu1002 ай бұрын
@@TheEternalVortex42 The implicit function theory is not always applicable. It is valid under certain conditions. suppose we have the following relation in the real number system: (x+lny)sqrt(-(x-3)^2)=x^2-y You can try to find dy/dx but does it have any meaning? The only x value in the domain is x=3 (with y=9). So the graph is a single point. has dy/dx any meaning despite the fact that you can find an expression for it? You can even define a relation where there is no graph at all: (x+lny)sqrt(-(x-3)^2)=x^2-y + sqrt(-(y-3)^2) but you can apply implicit differentiation giving a meaning less result. So it is always important to know that a given relation between x and y results in a differentiable function. You write: "It guarantees we can write this function as differentiable y = f(x) or x = g(y) everywhere." But are we sure that the given relation in the video complies with the conditions to use the principle of implicit differentiation?
@hydra-f9h2 ай бұрын
1:57 2:50 Why is y Not a constant, our only variable to respect when differenciating is x
@kevinpior52652 ай бұрын
Because y is a function of x here
@ve4rexe2 ай бұрын
because y is a function of x, in x
@kb277872 ай бұрын
Does this exist? Let's say x = 2 there will be 2 Y values (2 and 4) that fulfill this condition. So this is not a function in the strictest sense as one input can give multiple outputs. I imagine the graph would look like the straight line with slope of 1 (x=y) and then something else. Can we take the derivative of something that is not a function?
@chaosredefined38342 ай бұрын
That's not a problem. We can also use this approach to find the derivative of a circle (x^2 + y^2 = r^2), despite the fact that, for any x such that -r < x < r, there will be two values of y that work. Things get a bit loose when working with derivatives.
@TheEternalVortex422 ай бұрын
This is called an implicit equation. By the implicit function theorem we have some conditions under which an implicit equation gives you one or more (differentiable) functions. In that case the approach of implicit differentiation is correct for finding the derivatives of those functions. For example the simpler implicit equation x^2 + y^2 = 1 gives four functions y = sqrt(1-x^2) and x = sqrt(1-y^2) and the flipped versions. But in post cases you cannot write them down explicitly.
@priscilas242 ай бұрын
Now I can understand lot better 😊
@miguelaphan582 ай бұрын
. a most usefull lesson !!
@arcangyal22692 ай бұрын
Can we use dy/dx = - partial x / partial y?
@TheBlueboyRuhan2 ай бұрын
dy/dx = -Fx / Fy makes it so much faster and easier to do
@andirijal90332 ай бұрын
Explisit function ?
@Mediterranean812 ай бұрын
I did it using implicit differentiation
@Mediterranean812 ай бұрын
y*ln x = x ln y y/ln y = x/ln x ln y / y = ln x /x y’ (1-ln y) /y^2 = (1-ln x)/x^2 y’ = (1-ln x)y^2 /(1-ln y)x^2
@jasonryan25452 ай бұрын
@@Mediterranean81Is there any reason we can manipulate the fraction even more by increasing their power to the negative one? It seems a bit too much like steamrolling through....
@perost12272 ай бұрын
nice
@chrisglosser73182 ай бұрын
I wrote everything in terms of logs
@KeaneMbae2 ай бұрын
Your really smart and great at calculus why don't you try using all this math skills in writing a good program with a functional programming language e.g. Haskell/APL maybe you are also good at that
@notsoancientpelican2 ай бұрын
The original equation implies that Y equals X. ... Is it not so? If it is so, then dy/dx is 1. Simplex sigillum veri.
@bain8rennАй бұрын
2^4=4^2 2=/=4 x=/=y
@cesarluis63352 ай бұрын
I always go to the most easy one, the number 1 😂😂😂😂 the other ones are for crazy people❤😅