Illustration of Attempted Assassination of President Trump Part 2

[@ozarked2363]

Two minute video on KZbin was more informative than all the media reporting combined.

[@daveroles3783]

And we know this is ACTUALLY factual? Just because someone in a tiny top makes a 3D rendering and says" this is a 3D rendering of how many bullets were fired and their trajectory", doesn't mean its factual. There is zero references, nothing. Just a vid she made.

[@TaxPayingContributor]

​@@daveroles3783link to better video?

[@ozarked2363]

@@daveroles3783 Have you seen any news report that shows where the victims were? I haven’t. All we heard was they were behind Trump, and we saw the hydraulics blow on the lift.

[@MartianOrion]

​@@daveroles3783You work for CNN or something?

[@Cotions222]

​@@MartianOrion considering she has no 1st hand knowledge of the ballistic studies she could be wrong but she doesnt really push a narrative.

[@Irnerio21]

Probably the best reconstruction until now

[@合合合合合合合合合合]

yeah

[@swaptrex]

Agree

[@jonwebber607]

I disagree. There was forensic audio study done by a college and they've identified that there are at least three different guns fired. This animation is absolutely amazing in its visual presentation. However, it's factually wrong as it only shows all shots originating from one gun.

[@basalgiraffe742]

​@@jonwebber607Three guns? He shot with his feet also?

[@swaptrex]

@@jonwebber607 it’s obviously a reconstruction on what is known at this time. We can’t all base our opinions on one college study, without all of the evidence. However, I wouldn’t be shocked if there was more than one firearm.

[@jaykirizz219]

THIS is what I’ve been trying to find out!!! I’ve read tons of media articles and not gotten this much info on how the spectators were shot and where each bullet went. THANK YOU. Very informative. I like how you just lay things out with no agenda or narrative, unlike the media. Great video 👍

[@DuckDuckGo99]

the best illustration by far, of the event. No ads, no bs, just straight to the point

[@78tag]

...and NO verifiable facts !! You people know this is fiction right ??

[@gibbethoskins8621]

And she's hot too, extra points

[@kotnapromke]

Странно что преступники до сих пор используют такой архаичный способ убийства как снайперская вмнтовка. Вместо более современного - фпв дрон с 4кг пластиковой взрывчатки! Если бы был фпв дрон то у Трампа не было бы никаких шансов выжить.

[@friskydingo3281]

🤯🔫

[@gibbethoskins8621]

@@DuckDuckGo99 And she's hot too, extra points

[@gemstar3824]

Bonus points for the metaphorical detail of the Secret Service being non-existent in this rendering.

[@nautilaz]

Best comment

[@L0-R3Z]

@@nautilaz Best reply

[@friskydingo3281]

​@@L0-R3Zok 🤯🔫 There's your best reply

[@Tony-rl2fr]

🏆

[@williamboyle8918]

True lol

[@llroman7823]

Wow. Thank you for this. All these days later, we can finally see how the spectators were shot and the exact angle of everything and understand the situation better.

[@Darty26]

Multiple Shooters? | John Cullen & Clay Martin (TPC #1,538)

[@BackyardEngineer334]

This video was very well done. Nothing unnecessary added which is rare, thank you.

[@MyTwoCents2]

A keeper video

[@friskydingo3281]

🤯🔫

[@Wubsabi]

Agreed, she's very straight to the point with her resconstructions!

[@caseyritzmann3125]

@@BackyardEngineer334 wonder where she got all of her data? The Biden secret service director? 🤦🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

[@toolbaggers]

I use sponsor block and it autoskips the truly unnecessary stuff like repetitive intros and outros. Do you really need to see an intro of a video where all they do is say the title of the video and give you a synopsis of what you are gonna watch in 30 seconds?

[@MVMullins]

This clarifies a lot and is the first reliable information I've seen in days. Excellent job!

[@justbecause9645]

How do you no she's right???

[@OrRaino]

@@justbecause9645 Well The Simulation looks accurate enough, and anyways You can't be 100% right on where the bullets went.

[@MVMullins]

@@justbecause9645 Good question, but it makes more sense than anything I've seen to date. I was confused about the shot alignment and this actually adds up.

[@MVMullins]

@@OrRaino I'm sure it's not 100%, but I believe the important details are close enough, complete with video to corroborate her assertions. It's a far cry better than anything I'm seeing out of the mainstream media.

[@friskydingo3281]

🤯🔫

[@micro13989]

Great, straight to the point. Clear information, amazing graphics. I also like how you added the audio to give us an idea of timing. This is why television is dying, you just made what the news would take 15 minutes to get to or maybe never.

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@Na-if5ze]

@@Eric-y6n8u where was he?

[@fatbongripz4207]

wow, that sloped roof looks treacherous.

[@CTCDetroit]

Any roofer in the United States would not be concerned at the angle of the roof

[@carolynw8614]

@@CTCDetroitI think he was being sarcastic?

[@robslaughter2657]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gquTo2ykfMaVjNksi=snrp3caLzhiN7lSM Someone Shorted Trump’s Stock Just Before The Assassination Attempt!

[@alanjm1234]

​@@CTCDetroit too steep for the secret service. But a 20 year old basement dweller managed somehow.

[@GrumpyIan]

@@carolynw8614 The head of the Secret service said the reason why there were no snipers on that roof was because the roof was at too much of an angle. Now with that context look at where some where positioned.... a roof just as steep. Something doesn't add up with her statement.

[@flickedoff]

Everyone is so obsessed with noise and pretending to discern what everything "means." You're the only person I've found showing what HAPPENED. And I've looked. Excellent, clear, simple presentation.

[@JonDingle]

That is because the shots came from two guns and not one. Watch other videos with sound analysis.

[@chadwick5234]

There are many video’s of all kinds of illustrations

[@jarmenta69]

Are you talking about the window open behind Crooks in the second storey building where someone should have actually been watching​@@JonDingle

[@andrewlinn7863]

@@JonDingle Post the video title and channel name of the sound analysis if you are able.

[@jefft6802]

​@@JonDingle Her wonderful presentation focused on the shots fired from the killer's gun, which was clearly the intent. The sniper fire was OBVIOUSLY not the focus of her presentation. Why does there always have to be that one dingle in the crowd that you have to explain things to that were already clear to begin with??? Geesh!

[@musicalADD_theband]

Your channel is about to explode with this video. I think it answers a lot of people’s questions.

[@camdenyards1456]

Thank you! This is the first video I've seen that showed where each of the victims were.

[@weldonyoung1013]

Yes all lives matter

[@ripvanstinkle]

That's crazy that there were three shots fired while he was still standing there...

[@steveh1792]

@@johndees967 Use the decaf for a bit, you'll feel better.

[@pgrutube]

@@johndees967 Was the other Ozwald ??

[@graemepatterson]

@@johndees967 So two people missed from the same gun? 🤣🤣

[@DirkShotojima]

​@@pgrutubeno it was Jack Ruby and George Bush Senior

[@Steven-ze2zk]

@@DirkShotojima It was Donald Trump.

[@ariarc]

It's the best visual I've seen about this horrible event. Short and to the point. Congratulations.

[@inthetrenchwithbix1]

there were 2 shooters so how is this video good? its obviously NOT accurate. 3 different weapons can be heard firing! are you all deaf or something?

[@UntilNextime]

You showed more impressive detail than all other reports I've seen. This is a great success Amber. Respect !!

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@SneezingEagle]

These videos deserve more views, great work

[@cdog2331]

Yes

[@freddymartinez5406]

This dude is expecting a million views in an hour...smh

[@jeremychatman6155]

It’s all over Twitter. I hope she gets the revenue she deserves.

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@dunedad6738]

watching this exactly 1 week later; in amazement how fast you put this together with what appears to be remarkable accuracy. Let'ssee what "the machine" churns out 10 years from now.

[@dkilroy905]

You mean 70 years from now. The cant cover up if they look too soon.

[@goq9757]

What I find interesting is that after 3 shots, agents run onto the scene and surround Trump, and the 4th and 5th shots look like they hit the agents. After all, no agents were hit.

[@wiiiz3]

you're the definition of detail-oriented

[@BudFuddlacker]

Simp

[@grahamfraser2150]

i wonder where buddy got the ladder.he must have known there was one around or he placed one there.hmm.

[@HBosse90]

@@grahamfraser2150 He purchased it I believe the day before or earlier that morning. They have surveillance footage of him buying it, as well as purchase history.

[@rhettbaldwin8320]

@@HBosse90 Many reports say he didn't use the ladder, that the ladder he bought wasn't used. I suspect the ladder we see in the shots is how law enforcement got onto the roof.

[@noaheckman8330]

She is so bad

[@dougs9915]

Now that more information has come out, the locations of those wounded change the perspective as to what happened. Myself I was under the impression that everyone struck were in the first bleacher. Great illustration!

[@DN-kf4gg]

I thought the same, and then when you hear a women’s loud scream and the crowd looks to the bleachers on the right, it didn’t make sense. Then I found out one of the wounded was on the right bleacher. And now knowing 2 were on the right, the woman’s scream was most definitely from someone sitting next to one of the men that got hit on the right bleacher. Appreciate the visual - this makes sense now.

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@heathermeadows85]

@@DN-kf4gg The scream was Helen Comperatore, on the left side of the left bleachers. Unless there's more than one, but that's who I heard.

[@Sadoda777]

This is the best visual explanation I've seen on his event, kudos. Very good work.

[@believeiam9053]

I've been searching for hours trying to find a video that made sense. This answered all my questions very professionally done. Thank you

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@elale8016]

It contains mistakes though. Trump didn't fall, he decided to take cover. And I'm not so sure, if the position of the other victims is correct.

[@61066clocks]

Probably the best illustration so far..great work

[@JPMartin-d5k]

This is the best illustration I have seen, accompanied by an outstanding explanation.

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@YouTubeAreCommunistScum]

MY BALLS FARTED!

[@marcmaron9601]

This is incredible. Unbelievably talented

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@MTNLVR21]

Great video! I've been waiting for a video like this to come out. Thank you!

[@zionpadfield]

Incredible video! I learned more in two minutes here than I have in the last six days from watching the news!

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@stefanoastegonzalez527]

Excelent work on this video, neat animation and ilustration of the whole event. Straight to the point and no BS to drag this into a 10 min video.

[@mfb424]

While everyone should acknowledge the exact trajectories of the bullets are UNKNOWN at the moment. Only after the impact points have been found and the direct line discovered ALL of these animations are just illustrations without accuracy.

[@DrBodacious]

This answered questions I had been searching for but couldn’t find anywhere. Good job.

[@Tony56000]

Moi j'adore manger des moules avec des frites, c'est la spécialité dans ma région en Bretagne (France) j'habite Belle-Ile en mer ( lyteraly means "beautifull island on sea ") regardes des photos, c'est magnifique. je dis ça ca il est 4h30 am et que je n'arrive pas à dormir. Salutation de France cousin américain.

[@Darren-vh5lk]

Based on Trumps reaction, I'd never have predicted that bullet #1 was the bullet that struck his ear... I'd have said bullet #2 or #3 would be the 'ear shot'... fantastic reconstruction & animation all the same. RIP to the victim who passed and speedy recovery to all who got injured.

[@alanjm1234]

The first shot would be the best aimed. After that the shooter was firing fairly rapidly and would be dealing with recoil.

[@wlmounce]

I watched it many times and from what I saw it was the third shot that struck him. Especially when you account for distance of audio recording from the shooter. The slow travel of sound compared to light would only further the visual appearance of Trump being struck before the shot was heard. However you can clearly see and hear two distinct shots; to which the audience immediately starts reacting, and the third makes Trump wince and grab his ear; which appears to have a piece missing. A question for the OP, is there anyway to adjust the perspective or field of view? You did such a great job but I only ask because I know the shooter was 400 feet away and as a sportsman myself I know that to not be a long distance. The video showing the SS and shooters perspective make it seem a lot further. Hopefully that makes sense. The scale and everything is great. Just curious if there is a way to model what a persons field of view would be sitting on the roof or vice versa.

[@pgrutube]

@@alanjm1234 Agreed

[@hywelgriffiths5747]

That's what I thought too. His hand goes to his ear after the second shot sound. There might be some guesswork involved in this reconstruction

[@SchnabelMcSchnabel]

@@wlmounce Each bullet makes a sound (sonic boom) as it passes. Only later (about 1/5 second) will the sound of the muzzle blast be heard. Work the pits at a rifle match and you'll notice the sound of the bullet flying overhead is much louder than the muzzle blast. There may also be echoes from the structures. Which bullet him him is difficult to discern from sound alone.

[@aaronlong4754]

by far the best and most accurate illustration so far. great work!

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@poetsdreamsatc]

Since this horrible event I’ve been trying to understand where and when Corey and the 2 men were hit. Thank you so much for this explanation.

[@OutpostMJ]

Excellent -- as usual. Your turn-around time has really improved and I like how you revise your work by posting new "editions" of your videos that include additional information as it becomes available.

[@millentinion2686]

Give her the facts and she will make the absolute best reconstruction of what occurred. Nice presentation. It was put together professionally.

[@genesultry6447]

Agreed! she does need to add more detail for context. Overall, a pretty darn good illustration given what we know, so far.

[@AmericanCitizen-nf9xc]

“Occured”

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@KatJaguar1122]

I believe she was not given all facts.

[@gmajor1273]

Thank you so much for this. Your illustration has been best I've seen by far.

[@DANGJOS]

Wow brilliant work! I hope for a speedy recovery for those injured and am so sorry to the family of the man whose life was lost.

[@coaxelectrons531]

Ur fake

[@brettjohnson1393]

Wow! I was searching everywhere for a better idea of how it was all situated, and this popped up. Excellent reconstruction

[@inthetrenchwithbix1]

hmmmm there were 2 shooters so how is this video good? its obviously NOT accurate. 3 different weapons can be heard firing! are you all deaf or something?

[@TreeLBollingTreeMan]

jeffostroff channel brought me here. This by far the best reconstruction.

[@ShovelShovel]

This about to go viral

[@inthetrenchwithbix1]

pffft there were 2 shooters so how is this video good? its obviously NOT accurate. 3 different weapons can be heard firing! are you all deaf or something?

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@Tommy-pe8ct]

Great work on this video 👏👏

[@TruthIsAsOldAsGod]

Thank you so much for this. I was waiting and waiting for a whole picture. This answers all my questions.

[@bakerboys24]

Great work again! I am amazed at how fast you put these together.

[@Doraemon-ed3js]

Wow! This is the most comprehensive detail of the shooting. Please also add more details, when data is available, with regard to how secret service could have missed this detail. Thanks!

[@Sideshowbobx]

Wow, great job on illustration. The best I have seen so far.

[@margalena0828]

Thank you so much for this (and the part 1) video. I had a lot of questions about trajectory. This clears it up for me.

[@tomf429]

Close your eyes and listen to the shots. The first 3 sounded different than the last several shots. The "lag" between the click and thump of each shot signals distance. The first 3 shots came from further away (longer lag time) than the last several shots (shorter lag time). Have they recovered all the bullets and matched them up to Crook's rifle?

[@FrankStanley-j5y]

Yes, I've heard that audio analysis says that 3 were fired from one weapon (the shooter), 5 (not four, as is shown here) were fired from a DIFFERENT weapon (apparently not by the shooter), but from the same general direction, and there was also a single shot from a 3rd weapon, the one that took out the shooter.

[@iwaswrongabouteveryhthing]

we will never get that data

[@EllaL123]

@@FrankStanley-j5yI saw that too. I was hoping to see a comment regarding that analysis.

[@El_Hicks]

@@iwaswrongabouteveryhthing Sure we will. In 75 years!

[@VicknairD]

See Chris Martenson’s 2 shooters analysis of the audio.

[@TVNYCA]

An amazing reinactment of what really happened and explains a lot of the questions the public had of shots fired and where and when the audience members were hit A++

[@FranciscoShibata]

Now one with the counterattack of the snipers. :)😃

[@blindriv3r]

I think that was just one shot, from the team further away, the other SS snipers were blocked by the trees in front of the shooter's building

[@stachowi]

@@blindriv3r good call, i didn't realize that until i watched this.

[@jimheimerl1637]

@@stachowi Still, it would be good to see that one shot to show the skill of the one (1) security person who did their job (said somewhat sarcastically, but don't think I'm not pissed at the whole security situation).

[@tray3120]

@@jimheimerl1637that little town only had 12 police officers they told secret service they didn’t have the resources to cover all those buildings

[@HBosse90]

@@blindriv3r From what I heard, there were a total of 3 weapons fired there that day. The shooter, and 2 teams firing on the shooter. one team was a police team that apparently missed, and the 2nd was the SS with a kill shot in that order. Pretty gross when you find out the SS didn't even take the first shots at the "assassin"

[@LorraineRadaker]

You have explained more in 2 minutes than we have been shown in a week. Thank you!

[@Jason4Star]

This is what I have been looking for since Saturday. Thank you so much for doing this.

[@techsquirrel]

The scale and detail provide a useful framework. How did you determine the individual trajectories?

[@ValiEnnsa]

insane, can’t fathom how much work has gone into this video, well done!

[@uh1drvr]

This is by far the best 3D model reconstruction of the event I have seen. Up till now I didn’t know where the man that was killed was at, nor the other 2 victims. Absolutely a fantastic job, Amanda. You most definitely have a knack for this! Thank you, and please keep going. I have already subscribed and will continue to watch your other videos, all of them so far have been very good and informative. 👍

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@electronictreasure4191]

The best description I've see yet. Nice work!!

[@Bwekfest]

Damn, this is the best explanation I've seen. Awesome job👌

[@arlanandrews9946]

Thank you! Just the content I'd been waiting for, at last

[@AzgetFX]

Thank you arlan!

[@LisaBowers]

I've been following you since the Karen Read trial. You always do fantastic work. This video answered a lot of my questions. Thank you Amber!

[@LLBP.]

Thanks I've been waiting for someone to figure this out. How both sides of bleachers were hit. Good Intel.

[@carlwear1249]

I had been wondering the same thing.

[@tedcat99]

Thank you so much for putting this together, I just watched the congressional hearing ~ you were able to explain far more than Miss Cheatle’s lame excuses

[@humberto6219]

Thank you, Amber. Great work

[@jimheimerl1637]

As others have said, this is very well-produced, informative, there is no fluff, and there is no BS "music." You're going to get where you want to go if you keep doing things like this. Well done.

[@KennyChu]

the channel only startred a year ago

[@jimheimerl1637]

@@KennyChu And...? It's pretty dang good so far, so what's your point? EDIT: it’s pretty dang good so far, which is very impressive. I didn’t mean to be snarky. Sorry.

[@YouLookinAtMe-Bro]

​@@jimheimerl1637To me, it sounds like he's impressed with how good they're doing for starting only a year ago.

[@jimheimerl1637]

@@YouLookinAtMe-Bro Ah, good point - I was misinterpreting the message. Gonna fix my reply.

[@dnaglitchgaming6565]

Thank you for the clarification. I wanted to see someone reenacting it in person at the scene to see exactly what the snipers could see, Crooks could see, and the entire situation.

[@stickman-1]

You are the first one to get it right. Kudos to you! Thank you.

[@Jake_J_M]

First time I’ve ever seen any content from you. Your presentation and dialogue were incredible and efficient with time. Easiest decision to subscribe

[@TsavosAlliance]

Thank you for making this video.

[@JC62888]

Thank you for this illustration. The news media could not understand this or they are too inept to explain it.

[@curtf9813]

They would never put so much time into something like this. This woman worked for days on this.

[@coltentackett892]

Thank you for being better than CNN. It's not a high bar to clear but you cleared it❤😂😂

[@stanleyolszewski7701]

You have given us way more information than the secret service. 👍🏻

[@mm.f262]

Such an informative Illustration! Thank you!

[@ginghamt.c.5973]

Brilliant animation - and briefing. At last! This really brings home to me the callousness, disregard and murderous intent of the assassin. Deepest condolences to all those killed, injured and involved in this tragedy and to their families. Love from UK.

[@jeffviolet7241]

The only comment that doesn’t make sense in this description is President Trump “falling to the ground.” A more accurate description would be that he “ducked for cover” or “he got down.” Falling to the ground description is inaccurate. This video is excellent and clears up a lot of the jibber jabber out there! FIVE STARS!! Thank you.

[@TodSpurlc]

He fell to the ground

[@YouTuber-ep5xx]

@@TodSpurlc No. He clearly ducked intentionally.

[@TJ-W]

Who cares

[@Eric-y6n8u]

victim is in wrong place

[@TodSpurlc]

@@Eric-y6n8u thought and prayers

[@archizona]

If you weren’t a forensic animator, you are now. You have made an excellent, evidence worthy video. Well done and welcome to the forensics fam!

[@MegaFregel]

Evidence worthy? This could mostly be made up and none of us could tell. We just have to assume that this is how it went down.

[@archizona]

@@MegaFregel I am not saying it is factual. I am saying the quality of the reconstruction is worthy of use in court. She said she based it on photos and videos and that’s how it’s done. Whether those photos and videos have been vetted as factual, or not, we don’t know. I’m saying the quality is good enough for court.

[@MegaFregel]

@@archizona got it. Though that bar is not that high with todays technologies.

[@inthetrenchwithbix1]

LOL there were 2 shooters so how is this video good? its obviously NOT accurate. 3 different weapons can be heard firing! are you all deaf or something?

[@archizona]

@@inthetrenchwithbix1 😆

[@williampatrick4240]

Best illustration by far. Thank you.

[@anthonytravis1420]

Hey great job! Thank you. This is definitely the best Ive seen - the most consistent with available video and photographic evidence. Don't stop! keep up the good work!

[@mrkammytv]

Amazing analysis! And 3D animations ❤

[@silverbearinsights7049]

Thank you. Part one and two helped me understand the situation better. Subbed your channel.

[@AzgetFX]

Thank you Silverbearinsights!

[@nopewmopan]

Excellent work, Azget.

[@AbiFreeman-ou3nh]

This is probably the most informative analysis so far. Good job.

[@wtfman5313]

Excellent work! Your attention to detail is evident.

[@fivecylinderperfection5060]

While the simulation is very good, the detail is flawed. If you watch back any of the footage on YT with the ER Doctor trying CPR on the headshot victim, you will see a red tractor and what appears to be a red CASE combine harvester in the background. The crane shown in the simulation is located towards the back corner of the bleacher and the guy was standing slighter higher up tier seating. This would affect the trajectory shown.

[@rebirthisland2374]

​@fivecylinderperfection5060 I guess we will just have to wait for your detailed and much more in depth video to compare it to.

[@djharml3ss]

Yet, some people still believed these were all staged.

[@FloydRandol]

Not Staged but others were involved to allow this to happen!

[@ffemtx4]

​@@FloydRandol Riiiiiight...🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@djharml3ss]

@@FloydRandol Definitely yes, somebody is pulling the strings. Therefore that was an assassination.

[@ExoXquisite]

@@djharml3ss it's an assassination "attempted"...

[@robertberatheon4213]

@@ExoXquisitehe did get someone, so wouldn’t he be an assassin?

[@LFOD1776]

Incredible. Thanks for getting this together.

[@SaltStorm007]

You did a FANTASTIC JOB! Just wish everyone using your hard work would give you credit/link🤔

[@jmr]

Great job. I was waiting to see your recreation of this.

[@JimmyMakingitwork]

Excellent video, far more information that any TV news has brought.

[@pimpompoom93726]

Best reconstruction I've seen, you put the FBI and Secret Service to shame.

[@TomConrad-td5qi]

They are involved

[@LeviJane]

If the man who was hit in the head was standing, then the story about him covering his family is either fabricated or he fell on them. ?

[@effyouceeekay]

Its just for the sake of modeling a figure

[@SilverrulezGaming]

Well. To further an agenda it would be in Republicans best interest to create a story like that to gain sympathy on the situation and to cause a further fuel towards the current administration. Its a systematic operation.

[@thebigenchilada678]

Most likely, better to see him as a hero than a victim.

[@samuelmerrick3506]

Or simply didn't die instantly.

[@cl230]

His wife said he said “‘get down!” to his family as the shots first started. He likely was in the processed of moving over to protect his family while yelling “get down!” while at the same time being shot. Its all in a second’s time

[@clist9406]

That was excellent 3D modeling. Very well done

[@johnscustomsaws]

Such a good channel... Your Karen Read videos are awesome... and now this!!! Keep at it and you will have a HUGE channel 💯

[@Gert1803]

In fact a stupid channel ... calling this fellon "a president" ... ??? Oooops ... mistake after almost 4 years ... ???

[@betir5151]

Great work!!! Was the third person hit by the shot? I can’t see that on the illustration? or the third person in blue that is sitting changed position after the first shots and then got a shot?

[@betsyh2503]

I was wondering that too.

[@V00doo1Xim]

I believe so because 2 people were injured. The shooter and a spectator died in the assassination.

[@LoveWinsMovement]

This was exceptional!

[@aktchungrabanio6467]

Fantastic work! Thank you,

[@topangachronic9463]

Thank you for getting shooter position correct, 99% have it wrong.He used tree for concealment from counter team

[@t.h.o.r.]

water tower

[@topangachronic9463]

@@t.h.o.r. wrong angle for all shots

[@t.h.o.r.]

@@topangachronic9463 you can be wrong all you like.... kzbin.info/www/bejne/l2nClJ-moLlobq8si=uevwiELYi1CAUjJX

[@JasonFox-k2i]

This is pretty good! Thanks This visually indicates that the trajectories of the first 3 shots are different than the next 2 shots fired. Your illustration indicates the first 3 shots were fired from a slightly more elevated and to the right position.

[@BillSpitzak]

Huh? It's a computer graphic, made by someone who thinks (IMHO correctly) that all the shots came from that one gun, and all the lines are going to the same point. A video made by someone who does not believe your conspiracy theory is not going to prove your conspiracy theory!

[@bguerra4]

I didn't realize the shooter made more than three shots (based on the news reporting elsewhere) I thought the second burst of fire (black lines in this video) was the sniper team returning fire....and never saw the crane dropping the speakers before. There must be countless angles and video that will continue to slowly be released

[@steveh1792]

The counter-sniper shot was most likely the big spike in the audio shortly after the animation ended. Probably a .300 WinMag or equivalent, and louder than the shooter's .223. It's about 26sec after the shooter's first shot.

[@grahamfraser2150]

i'm surprised there aren't more actual video breakdown.

[@ПавелЗакиров-д4б]

Я думаю это видео фэйк, не обращайте на него внимание, тому доказательство хвалебные комментарии ботов. Раненые располагались в других местах. И да 4 выстрела после, это похоже на ответный огонь. А сам выстрел ранивший Трампа вообще мог быть сделан с другой точки. Снайпером с оптикой..

[@scninja07]

@@steveh1792 There are the three shots separated by around a second each, then 5 rapid fire shots, and then a shot right after that is probably a first counter sniper shot. Then maybe 5 seconds after that shot, there is a quieter shot and the woman loudly screams. Guessing that is a second sniper shot from another gun. Then the people on other vids say the guy is down, and shortly after the secret service is heard saying shooter is down.

[@amantedar123]

@@grahamfraser2150 There are. I have at least seen three others.

[@HappyDudeCustoms]

I love your video analysis and how you reconstruct the situations. Very cool and captivating content!

[@FlGal22]

Watched your earlier videos of Karen Read. I was so excited to see people near me sharing this video. Great work.

[@SaltStorm007]

COMPLETE BS that all these content creators are using you video and not giving you credit/linking to your page💯You did an AMAZING JOB and I subbed as soon as I found you! Also interesting how your video doesn’t come up like it did before...🤔

[@heidiw8406]

It would be good to know the height from the ground of the two men to the left of Trump in the bleachers compared to the height of Trump at the podium? I would think the two men in the bleachers were higher than Trump.

[@susanszymanski1631]

I agree! What measurements were used to make the simulation?

[@JBQQ4U]

Thank you for this, very well done de-/re-construction. RIP to Corey Comperatore and wishing a swift recovery for the others injured.

[@theskatemap]

Holy fucking shit - He didn't just barely get missed by one bullet... He literally fucking dodged seven :O - I thought those others were from the secret service, the faster bullets. That's absolutely insane. Great reconstruction.

[@mfb424]

Without having the exact impact points of the bullets this is just approximation and there is no proof ANY of the bullets hit mr T.

[@stuartmc18]

@@mfb424 Mr T? Shuddup fool!