Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? - A Catholic Analysis

Рет қаралды 13,725

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 33

@vaticancatholic-dimond 4 ай бұрын

This is an important video that contains many new points. We hope that people watch the entire video, for there are important points throughout. 0:00 Defenders Of “Co-Redemptrix” Don’t Know What The Term Means 1:04 “Co-Redemptrix” Literally Means That Mary Is A Redeemer 2:25 Trent Infallibly Teaches That Jesus “Alone” Is The Redeemer 3:35 Theologian Van Noort Against The Title “Co-Redemptrix” 5:27 Theologian Fr. Joseph Pohle Against The Title 6:19 A Theologian Makes An Interesting Admission About The Term 7:02 St. Thomas Teaches That Only Jesus Is Called “Redeemer” 7:26 Cardinal Gibbons Teaches That Only Jesus Is Called “Redeemer” And “Savior” 7:46 The Council Of Florence’s Dogmatic Definition That Jesus “Alone” Redeemed Man 8:49 The Roman Catechism (Catechism Of Trent) Teaches The Same 9:19 St. Robert Bellarmine Teaches The Same 10:27 Mediatrix Objection 16:37 Defenders Of “Co-Redemptrix” Are Inconsistent & Often Abandon Their Primary Claim 17:45 St. Thomas Refuted Their Argument 18:40 Some Of The Misinformation That’s Spread On This Issue 18:54 The Mistranslation Of Pope Leo XIII’s Encyclical On The Rosary 19:08 Taylor Marshall Uses The Mistranslation Of Pope Leo XIII 20:06 Pope St. Pius X’s Teaching In Ad Diem Illum 20:15 False Traditionalist Priest Misquotes Pius X 22:54 Other False Arguments For “Co-Redemptrix” Refuted 30:13 Mary Was Redeemed 31:40 Original Sin Was The Sin Of One 32:11 St. Thomas Aquinas And St. Robert Bellarmine Teach That Original Sin Was The Sin Of Adam Alone

@unamsanctam7296 4 ай бұрын

Outstanding video MHFM. Thank you for setting the record straight, on this important issue. May Christ our Lord continue to Bless and Protect your life-changing Monastery.

@eagle44442 4 ай бұрын

Thank you MHFM for doing this video. It’s very important and many true Catholics will benefit from it without a doubt. Many heretics have been lead astray by this false title of “Co-Redemptrix.” It doesn’t honor Mary, rather it offends her. Glory to Christ who ALONE is our Redeemer!

@suzy4798 4 ай бұрын

As a new traditional / sedevacantist Catholic . I thank you so much for this teaching ❤

@arunjoseph7354 4 ай бұрын

same for me deo gratias for mhfm

@aecalietvenali 4 ай бұрын

Thank you, brothers, for this very enlightening and important video...Jesus in Mary be always with you..

@lyndapisano6373 3 ай бұрын

Very, very good and informative! Thank you again 💓

@vaticancatholic-dimond 4 ай бұрын

To see future videos, sign up for our e-mail list here: mhfm.email The permanent page for this video is here: endtimes.video/mary-not-co-redemptrix/

@m.hartyfool 4 ай бұрын

I’m thankful for this clear answer on this topic. Jesus my Lord and Redeemer.

@margaretadamson6239 4 ай бұрын

Thank you! Very important video, as a returning Catholic and this term co-redeemer never made sense. I love reading St Thomas Aquinas, he always clarifies. I miss the traditional Mass and will continue to search.

@vaticancatholic-dimond 4 ай бұрын

Please e-mail or call us about the issue of where to receive sacraments. Sincerely...

@l.antoinetteanderson3736 4 ай бұрын

Thank you, MHFM, for this presentation - yes, this video contained so many points of doctrine: I learned so much!

@DarrenCarrie Ай бұрын

Thank you very much for sharing this Brilliant Documentary 👏. God bless ❤

@OverLord115 4 ай бұрын

Thank you MHFM, for your work in the Name of the Highness. Also, in Spanish, "Co-Redemptrix" is translated as "Corredentora", which literally means female redeemer.

@NsiimireJosephat-r3r 4 ай бұрын

Big thanks. I had unanswered questions which are now answered in this video. May God bless and protect you.

@tommasogiri8823 4 ай бұрын

A clear and enlightening video, as well as very deep and fascinating. The heights of theology are reached in these last times precisely by you, thank God.

@ChristofferCatholic 4 ай бұрын

This is an amazing and brilliant video proving the "Co-Redemptrix" "title" to be wrong and incompatible with Catholic teaching. It also explains and illustrates well how some errors against Catholic teaching are not notoriously heretical, while others are, an important distinction which shows that, contrary to what some claim, true popes in history can err on certain doctrinal issues (like the "Co-Redemptrix" or "Baptism of Desire" errors) without being presumed to be guilty of heresy, since such errors were not notoriously heretical.

@navigatorofthevalley 4 ай бұрын

Thank you for clarifying this, i was honestly confused hearing people saying this.

@EcclesiaInvicta 4 ай бұрын

True Taditional Catholic teaching on the Mother of God! Thank you for this! Can you do a next video on the Traditional Catholic teaching of Original Sin? Eastern Heterodox and Pelagian heretics of our day are constantly attacking it recently.

@timgross8952 4 ай бұрын

Our lady of Guadalupe shows her with a cross showing that there is one greater than her! I learned that from you. 7:08

@ravensfan2617 4 ай бұрын

This video does a great job supporting your point, but why is the title "Co Redemtrix" being used so often these days? What's their objective? Simply to reduce Jesus' importance?

@vaticancatholic-dimond 4 ай бұрын

Hello. The answer is that throughout history multitudes have exhibited the tendency to worship idols/created things. Consider, for example, how many times members of Old Testament Israel fell into idolatry. The obstinate insistence that Our Lady is ‘Co-Redemptrix’ (in the face of dogmatic statements that contradict it) is a manifestation of that tendency in our day. There are many accurate and appropriate titles that signify Our Lady’s crucial role and her unique holiness (as the greatest of all humans ever created). But, as the video shows, she is not the female Redeemer (which is what 'Co-Redemptrix' means).

@Diogo_1385_ 4 ай бұрын

Great video. This also shows that the baptism mockers have no devotion to St. Thomas. They contradict him in many subjects like the necessity of explicit faith in the divinity of Jesus for salvation and that He is the sole redeemer, etc... but cry when catholics reject his opinion on baptism of desire. They don't even believe in the opinion of St. Thomas on BOD because he believed that a person had to at least have explicit faith in Jesus and desire baptism. MHFM has the true catholic faith of all the centuries.

@VoiceInTheDesert3357 4 ай бұрын

Finally!!! I was hoping for this video from a long time! Many siincere Catholics are in grave error with Mary on this exceeding from veneration to idolatry...

@OreFerValle 4 ай бұрын

The preposition “cum” in latin compounds words has the sense also of the adverb “simul” which means “at the same time” or “simultaneously”. So, we traditional catholics must avoid this term in regard of our Lady as this material correctly explains.

@paxsincera836 4 ай бұрын

Excellent video brothers. Another point that I have thought about this issue is that Jesus Christ is the Lamb of God. I remember reading in the old testament that a young, male lamb was sacrificed in order to forgive sin. The priest would sprinkle the blood of the lamb on the sinner in order to redeem him. Therefore in the new testament, it was only the blood of Jesus Christ that was shed on the cross and not of Mary. Today that Holy Blood is distributed by valid priests through the sacraments of Baptism, Confession and Communion in order to redeem us.

@pugmom4life141 4 ай бұрын

Perfectly explained.

@AskTheKid 4 ай бұрын

Great video

@THEJET52 4 ай бұрын

Excellent…thank you!

@deus_vult8111 4 ай бұрын

Another fantastic video. If God ever allowed a true Pope to reign again he should definitely condemn this erroneous “co-redemptrix” view by name, along with “baptism of desire & blood”.