Who Got Jesus Right: Muslims or Christians? | Mohammed Hijab Interviews Dr. Bart Ehrman

[@IslamNetEnglish]

DONATE NOW: www.saveiman.com/en? The Prophet ﷺ said: “𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙙𝙨 𝙖 𝙈𝙤𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝘼𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙝, 𝘼𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙝 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙝𝙞𝙢 𝙖 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙅𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙖𝙝.” If you support this project, you will in sha Allah get a house in Jannah and share in the rewards of all the people: ✅ Praying in the Masjid! ✅ Making Dhikr! ✅ Memorizing the Qur’an! Please donate and help establish this Masjid and earn your reward ➡ www.saveiman.com/en? ⬅ Dr. Bart Ehrman's webinar: www.bartdehrman.com/did-jesus-call-himself-god? #SaveIman

[@bourbon4707]

Bart Erhman believes Jesus was Crucified Bart Erhman says Jesus claimed to be God Bart Erhman believes that all the Gospels authors believed thtat Jesus is God

[@ultimatetruth9241]

The irony is that Bart is exposing the insincerity of Muslims. He criticise his book cause he is facing discrepancies in it but Hijab who said "there are variations in the reading of the Quran that affect the meaning of the text" does not have the guts to criticise the "multiple meanings" of the verses of the Quran. Bart is guessing trying to figure the real Bible but Allah has given us the tools to find the real Quran. Yes !!!!!! First of all, Allah has let us know that other books will be written and be called the quran but they are not!!!! How many times Allah says "this Quran" or "this hadith" in the Quran? What do you learn from prophet Muhammad saying "This Quran has been been revealed to me to preach it to you or to any generation it might reach" (6:19)? How can you not understand that other book will be attributed to him? This Quran, not the others!!!!!🤔🤔 When Allah Himself says "this is NOT a FABRICATED hadith" (12:111), don't you not understand that they will fabricate books and call them qurans when they are not? Didn't they say "bring us another quran or change it"? Didn't Allah say they will write books and say "this is from Allah"? I guess you are all waiting for me to answer your innermost question "bro, how so you know the real Quran"? Yes Allah did give us a universal tool to know and recognize His Quran. It's in Chapter 74 starting verse 30 "19 are/is guarding it"!!!!! The "are" refers to the 19 angels guarding the hellfire (74:31-1 Only angels are guardians of the hellfire). The "is" is referring to the number 19 (74-31-2 We have chosen their NUMBER only to disturb the disbelievers, to give certainty to the people of the book, to increase the faith of the believers, to expose the hypocrites and the disbelievers....). Now how can the number 19 do all of that? Well, Allah has coded His real Quran wth that number. Every letter, every verse, every word, every expression, every chapter is coded with the number 19 in the Quran. A few examples : 114 chapters in the Quran (19x6), 6346 verses in the Quran (19x334), 2698 times the name Allah in the Quran (19x142), the basmala has 19 letters, the expression "God alone" (Allahu wadahu) is 5 times in the Quran and if you add the chapter and verse numbers of those 5 times, you got 361 (19x19)!!!!! Now this last one will freak you out : every chapter has so many verses between 3 and 286. Now align all the chapter numbers followed by the number of verses in each like chapter 1 has 7 verses (11234567) followed by 212345678...286 312345....200.........114123456. This is a number long of 12692 digits and it's a multiple of 19!!!!!!!! So any Quran fails to respond to the 19 criteria is manmade and is not from Allah. Ain't that simple? Very indeed. But Hijab will keep on defending different qira'aats even though Allah says "one only"!!!!!! The other admission of guilt that Hijab did in this interview is that "there are contradictions in the hadiths books" !!!! Although he red himself the verse saying that "if this Quran came from humans, you would found numerous contradictions, he cannot conclude that the hadiths are not from Allah cause of their blatant contradictions!!!!!!!!! Does he believe in Allah? Clearly not!!! Bart said "humans too do write books without contradictions"!!!!!! Hey brother Bart, Allah is talking about books said that they are coming from God like the Bible, the Quran or the Torah!!!!!. Your way of thinking is so low. Sorry but we all know that math books or others can be without contradictions. But we are talking religion and God here. Allah say only the purified ones will touch His Quran!!!!!! If you don't believe in the miracle 19, you will never touch the real Quran. Salam

[@lorenzochimelis7359]

@@bourbon4707 the muslims believe crucifixion means death on the cross of which Jesus never experienced in relation to that if Jesus used the sign of JONAH to articulate his experience then at no time did he even experience death thus Christians here have a catastrophic problem because either Jesus died on the cross which therefore makes him a false prophet because it violates his statement pertaining to. His similitude to JONAH or he fulfilled his similitude to jJONAH fulfilling his statement thus erasing the Christian belief that salvation is through his BLOOD and DEATH of Jesus as he NEVER. DIED these are 2 antithetical conclusions it’s ONE OR THE OTHER there is no other choice or acceptable middle ground remember his DEATH and a BLOOD wax to end the system of sacrifice forever Paul makes this clear in HEBREWS .10:18 the reality is that for Jesus to be incorporated into that statement he had TO DIE thus using JONAH as a sign was Inexcusably STUPID and IGNORANT which yet gives rise to another set of problems regarding the claim for. Is divinity ...... as for his disciples believing he was god that. Completely contrary to the truth the notion of belief in him being god is a much later development long long after the disciples died as admitted to me directly in conversation with DR. DANIEL B WALLACE in my video called .... CHRISTIANITY FAITH WITHOUT FOUNDATION SO SAY CHRISTIAN SCHOLARS . PART 2 they did not believe Ben understand the rational behind the so called cruciFICTION and salvation I suggest you watch that video it’s on KZbin the man you see is ME

[@lorenzochimelis7359]

@@bourbon4707 I fall The gospel authors believed Jesus was god then it would have bedbugs authoritative with no point of dispute but the historical reality is this that it took close to 400 years for Christianity to establish an orthodoxy to be representative of the collective belief of and the collective of the body of Christ his divinity and trinity were the most hotly disputed issues of that time if Dr BART believed as you say then it’s a con session to remain a professor at his college pure and simple

[@ΓραικοςΕλληνας]

Why your God supposed sent down a text book called quran, and dont reveals himself personaly?

[@DefrimIsai]

TODAYS LESSON : YOUR ENEMY'S ENEMY IS NOT YOUR FRIEND

[@DefrimIsai]

@Jon Doe no …go and ask a scholar if you are genuine and sincere

[@DefrimIsai]

@Jon Doe learn proper English you creep, before you sprout your devil words

[@DefrimIsai]

@Jon Doe haha pulled you out in the open bright spark.

[@DefrimIsai]

@My Dear Brother Ben The PTSD he suffered as a result of discovering the fallacies within Christianity has poisoned his ability to engage with Islam.

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@slifi3972]

"Ive had phone books without contradiction but don't think it's from god"

[@tinaf600]

Haha 🤣 I love that he said that!!!

[@Jam-ku5tf]

@@tinaf600 lolll God wasn't a white man.

[@tinaf600]

@@Jam-ku5tf hahaha 🤣 nope

[@shafee1891]

It is as if we say a raven is black , and you taken it as every black bird is a raven. We say if a book is from God, there will be no contradictions in it, not that all the books that have no contradictions in it are from God.

[@mhamedkhattabi5863]

because it is written using computers . i am not amazed

[@dachosen7368]

This discussion is a total blow to Islam... that's why if you look for it on Muhammad hijabs channels you find it edited to a few minutes

[@shahidachoudhury6925]

Now it’s 24 hours.

[@talebals]

Its posted fully on islam net so?

[@dachosen7368]

@@talebals It would make much more sense if the debater posts it on his channel. Infact this one here will be deleted soon, but we are smart just like last time with the Yasir Qadhi classic of standard holes. This I have already downloaded and saved 😂

[@trajictempr8574]

@@dachosen7368 sure, these people won't delete it lol

[@MultiSpellforce]

Where is the "blow" ? Is it in the logical arguments which Hijab brought that Dr Ehrman couldn't refute with even 1 argument besides "I don't buy it" and layman "I use logic only when convenient"Please watch and write the arguments that Hijab so politely makes and write the denial of Dr Ehrman the one who throws logic away just to contradict because that's all he has done .

[@stanleyjenkins7346]

Once again Dr. Ehrman displays his brilliance! Thanks!

[@FactsWithActs]

He contradicted himself alot in this discussion

[@avonsterling36120]

​@@FactsWithActs where😂

[@dont-click-here-or-seeplaylist]

Dr. Bart Ehrman: “94% of the new testaments comes from 9th century onwards” 🙏🏾✝ worship the cross idol pray to it. amen.

[@BrendanSmith-vy4he]

Please b careful Bart is not on Gods side

[@dont-click-here-or-seeplaylist]

@@BrendanSmith-vy4he if someone from opposite non believing side speaks the truth that is *verifiable* it is the duty of all who say they believe in god (who is the truth) to listen and verify and accept the truth,

[@daro8593]

tHANK YOU Muhammad hijab that you brought the historian who says that that Jesus was crucified!

[@PingPong-wr1cl]

M Hijab ......YOU’VE IBN FAROOQED!”

[@osb7948]

The Quran’s view on the crucifixion is very clear. The Quran states the following: “And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.” 4:157 The verse clearly states that it appeared to them that they had indeed crucified him, therefore it makes sense that there is a historical claim that Jesus was crucified. Given that there is a historical claim of crucifixion, a naturalist historian like Ehrman will obviously accept that. He doesn’t believe in the supernatural, he doesn’t believe in revelation and he doesn’t believe in God. So it makes perfect sense that he’d just go with the naturalist explanation of the historical claim of crucifixion being what actually happened rather than the Muslim claim of God intervening and the supernatural occurrence of the messiah being saved (which btw is very clearly prophesied in the Old Testament). You really think Hijab doesn’t know this? You think he brought Ehrman on to proof Islam’s view on the crucifixion? How about instead of making silly claims you instead focus on where a naturalist historian like Ehrman’s views do line up with the Quran. That the Bible has undoubtedly been corrupted, edited and that the originals are no longer extant, that the authors are unknown men with pseudonyms and the avalanche of evidence against biblical inerrancy that almost every single biblical scholar attests to. It’s funny how most Christians in the comments (the vast majority of whom believe in biblical innerancy) ignore this and instead focus on some straw man argument that wasn’t even being made.

[@blackcat4711]

@@osb7948 you nailed it

[@cslewis1404]

😂

[@feduntu]

@@osb7948 "The verse clearly states that it appeared to them" so show me direct evidence where allah says someone else was crucified! And whom? Sources please! All you have are nothing but assertions! Funny how your religion relies on myths and unprovable farytales! Jesus was not crucified? Oh ok, let's change the argument to, someone else was crucified! But lets go with your logic! You just prove your god is silly because in doing so, he has made the biggest religion in history! Well done silly allah

[@johnzuma4688]

At time 10:12 Hijab asks Bart Ehrman if he agrees more with the Islamic view of Jesus or the Christian view of Jesus. Ehrman clearly states that the Christian view of Jesus is more accurate then the Islamic one.

[@sjappiyah4071]

@@smp5343 I respect your honesty mate

[@theastronomer5800]

One does not have to be religious to see that all the textual evidence shows that Jesus was crucified at the very least. I don't think that Jesus was a god any more than I think that Allah is a god, but the Christian texts are more true to what happened. The Quran, written 600 years after the fact, claims that while the gospels (which are just a generation or two removed from the events) are not correct. Historically such a view does not hold up. The Quran also uses many late sources, such as the Infancy Gospels, which are highly fictional, yet it claims that these things also happened. No historian would accept such a view.

[@johnzuma4688]

@@theastronomer5800 You are correct. The evidence we have shows that Jesus was crucified irrespective if you believe if Christianity is correct or not. So why would Mohammed come up with this story. Simple, he needed to be a prophet so that his leadership role was legitimate. If Jesus died on the cross why would we need a further prophet? Logically another prophet is not necessary if Jesus died on the cross for our sins and following Jesus will lead to heaven. So coming up with the story that it only appeared as if Jesus died on the cross is a great compromise to explain the events 600 years earlier, yet still explain why a further prophet for man-kind was needed. So besides the historical evidence for Jesus dying on the cross, the story told by Mohammed makes sense if we assume that he needed to legitimize himself as a leader of the Arabs. But it also tells us that Mohammed was never a prophet of any God.

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@munkush9287]

@@johnzuma4688 Jesus answered: "Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, `I am the Christ, ' and will deceive many. You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come.

[@rudytangkas1887]

the fact that bart ethman believed that jesus was crucified

[@maur_sault750]

Well he is with the majority. It was documented after all. Its only 400 years after a Arab man in a cave said that Jesus was not crucified after he was spoken to by the angel Gabriel who was speaking for God. No witnesses to this . Read that back. Yes that makes alot of sense

[@sofiapinot7422]

In a historical point it makes sense

[@citra678]

This prove that Quran is wrong 🤪 he blasphemed the quran 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@chrisdovrik2894]

Why is it hard to accept? Do you not understand the meaning of "historical"? He believes Jesus existed but was not a God. He was a MAN. He was crucified due to destablishing the status quo. Bring a message of God etc. Unbeknownst to him this is the Islamic narrative. Minus the supernatural element of Jesus soul being raised to heaven and another soul (Judas?) being transposed onto Jesus body.

[@hereweare9096]

@@chrisdovrik2894 Islam has no proof of Jesus being replaced. It goes against the historical account. Islams version is hearsay. The Quran cannot even verify its own account as to this doctrine. There is no why? How? Who? Where? account. The Bible provides great detail. Stating that Jesus was before the Sanhedrin / Pilate / Herod/ the journey to the place of death / the time of death / the burial / the tomb etc.

[@simphiweduma7031]

Bart said "all because a book has no contradictions doesn't mean it comes from God" and hijab says "true" LOL

[@Omar-sn1uy]

Yea... who said Qurans evidence is that it doesn't have a contradiction..?? qur'an claims it to be one of the necessary condition to be word of God as hijab later clarifies it ... That's y he said... and that's y bible cant be word of God because it falls behind from this condition as it contains error

[@prenom8793]

But your book is full of contradictions how it can be from god?

[@JesusSaves349]

@@Omar-sn1uy Quran called Christians and Jews as People who have the book, while Muslims are people of no book.

[@Israel-uf2eo]

@@JesusSaves349 yea... But why are you lying about Islam? I know Jesus loves christian who lies(according to Christianity) but that doesnot mean we dont see your lies

[@JesusSaves349]

@@Israel-uf2eo Jesus is The Truth, while Muhamad is The False Prophet.

[@samuelmithran5586]

When the weapon you trusted the most backfires 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@carissadarra8001]

😂

[@catbilota2492]

Exactly

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@samuelmithran5586]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz 15:07

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

@@samuelmithran5586 I don’t care what they think. I care what Christ peace be upon him believed.

[@section-voi]

These time stamps for me though... @23:25 @30:11 @32:52 @39:28 It does seem to me that this does not help dawah, goes against most Islamic claims and it destroys the notion that Paul neither knew nor was close to any of the apostles

[@bourbon4707]

🤣

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@section-voi]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz How about @38:08 by the same person. Does all his remarks matter, especially the later ones or you're just going to cherry pick as it suits your purpose. I think there is a word for that.

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

@@section-voi Jesus was a Messenger of God.

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

@@section-voi That’s literally what you’re doing in your time stamps. The irony is staggering. And Hijab answers those points.

[@YoungZ787]

This dude is the gift that keeps giving…

[@israfilangel8062]

(This is for Christians) It's both funny & ironic and hypocritical how some Christians are stuck on the part where the x-christian bart said "I believe he was crucified" but they ignore the fact that he said the bible is changed, edited (corrupted) which agrees with the Qur'anic view and this alone is sufficient to reject the bible's narrative, and they ignore where he said jesus didn't believe he was God which also agrees with the Qur'an and they ignore where he said jesus wasn't born of a virgin which contradicts the bible more since it's central based on jesus and they also ignore that bart does not believe in jesus's miracles thus he doesn't believe in the biblical narrative that jesus rose up in the 3rd day lol! So one question to the Christians if that's all what triggered you is bart "believing" in the crucifixion despite we also believe it took place but it was made to appear to them as if it was jesus.. so do you really think bart believes jesus rose up from the death after three days yes or no? Do you believe bart for saying jesus didn't believe he was God? Do you believe bart for saying jesus didn't perform any miracles? Do you believe bart for saying jesus wasn't born of a virgin? And most importantly do you believe in Bart's work and views that he said the bible was changed (corrupted) which will debunk everything written on it even the crucifixion itself!? So are you going to be consistent and take Bart's for everything he says? Huh!

[@searchrightthings.947]

First big shocking news for deluded islam phobic christians is that already the bible both old and new parts are unreliable. is not 100% or 50% the word of God or prophets or even disciples of mosses and jesus rather than them or God. Second big shocking thing for deluded Christians islam phobic is. 4:49 they try to figure out what possibly happened !!! Lol Possibly not surely happened like islamic world have a chain of solid 100% reliable narration for the authentic hadith , Bruh Quran is another level of reliability 100M%. Plus i will add if i realise more facts after this interview.

[@nemesis1291]

@@israfilangel8062 a phone book is more accurate than the korään, it must be from Allah 😅😂🤣

[@nemesis1291]

@@searchrightthings.947 Emty words without any evidence

[@cautiousoptimist9672]

@@israfilangel8062 You realky really dint understand christianity. You need to listen carefully to what Urhman said and ask yourself why he stayed a christian after finding errors. His reason for leaving can be and is applied to islam as well. I will give you a head start. Christianity wrote the new testament, the new testament did not create christianity. This is a clue as to why Urhman could still be a christian all those years after finding errors, 99% of which were not theological. The answer is in this discussion by the way, it surprised me. I thought urhman was just going to bash the Bible but Islam got the hardest hit. Only one religion atheist dislike more than Christianity....Islam🤣.

[@leonkennedy9754]

Moh Hijab is very Genius , he can make Dr Bart defend christian , wow

[@NonikSinyo]

Mr. Hijab is really helpful for Christians to read and believe in Bible ❤️

[@aldenpadilla1773]

@@NonikSinyo 1+1+1=1 believers enjoying humiliation of bible 😂

[@NonikSinyo]

@@aldenpadilla1773 1+1+1=1. The concept of flesh, the spirit and the soul can help to explain it.

[@ch4rmeen]

@@aldenpadilla1773 God isn’t a maths equation 😂

[@davidpersaud1630]

@@ch4rmeen so why do we worship 3 Gods Islam makes sense by the minite really thinking of converting christianity has become a mess 1+1+1=3

[@SamuelGreen-AU]

Ehrman gives us the contradiction that changed his mind at 19:10ff. He says the contradiction is that Mark 2 says that Abiathar was high priest but the Old Testament says (1 Samuel 21) it was Ahimelech who was the high priest. Please read 1 Samuel 21 for yourself. Both Ahimelech and Abiathar were priests, and 1 Samuel 21 does not say who was high priest that year. Ehrman creates the false impression that 1 Samuel 21 says the high priest was Ahimelech when it doesn't. There is actually no contradiction at all. There is nothing to solve. I do not think Muslims realise how bad Ehrman's scholarship is. He says things that people want to believe.

[@SamuelGreen-AU]

@Tovia's Kryptonite I believe what the scripture says 2Ki 2:11 And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, which parted them both assunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

[@SamuelGreen-AU]

@Tovia's Kryptonite Can you please give me some details?

[@ramadhangona9085]

Please search and read the gospel of Nicodemus

[@SamuelGreen-AU]

@Tovia's Kryptonite It is good that you have done this research. Here is my understanding. 1. John 3:13 is referring to the Son of Man. In the OT there is only one who ascends to the throne of God and that is the Son of Man, see Daniel 7. This is what Jesus is talking about. 2. Regarding Elijah, doesn't 1 Kings 22:50 indicate that Elijah was present during the reign of Jehoram?

[@jesusislord3003]

Didn't really go Hijabs way. Backfired, 😂😂😂.

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@TUNEin2Bliss]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz Shocker coming from an Atheist...

[@samhack02gm30]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz he disagrees with Islam and Christianity, but Christians didn't call him to disprove Islam lol

[@ban_tuo]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz Ehram obviously respects Jesus, so he doesn't think Jesus thought He was God. Because if Jesus claimed to be God, then He was either true God or insane man. Since Ehrman doesn't believe in God and does believe, that Gospel authors considered Jesus as God, he just thinks Jesus wasn't insane and didn't thought He was God.

[@antoniorocha3967]

@@ban_tuo Nothing to do with it, he looks at the historical man, and history looks at the past from a scientific view. Jesus was a man, what Ehrman says is that the islamic tradition on Jesus is false, and the christian tradition it's much more close to the truth. The islamic tradition is in fact gnostic, islam is a schizophrenic view on religion, based on judaism, christianism and gnosticism.

[@shareefcondon]

I just wish he would turn his skills to an analysis of Al Quraan. May Allah open his heart.

[@snpddl8540]

@Dariusz Guzik Hes a respected prophet of God , unfortuantely his message was corrupted, the quran came and corrected the false narrative of Jesus .

[@ألثقفي-ث6ض]

@Dariusz Guzik Well, as a Muslim, I can answer you why I am fascinated by him, because he is a pure man of heart and soul, does not lie, does not cheat, and the most important thing is that he was chosen by God and was born from a pure and honorable woman, and as God says about her in the Holy Qur’an 《{ God chose her, purified her and preferred her over the women of the worlds }》

[@kenkaneki9138]

@Dariusz Guzik There are many things as Muslims we can say to that question but the main thing that differentiates Jesus pbuh from all other messengers and prophets of God is that he is the ONLY one who people took as God when he came to preach to only believe in his God the only true God.

[@sophiafilms8072]

It would be a nightmare for u

[@ألثقفي-ث6ض]

@@sophiafilms8072 What would be a nightmare for mee ?

[@human7914]

Mo Hijab thankyou for your service to the Christian faith.

[@dimasaryotejo4227]

Yes indeed mimi hijab webinar strengthen the christian faith. There is not any possibility for a human being created a book withouth contradiction, such as a phone book. So hillarious.... I am proud that bible has many contradiction cause its written by a human inspired by the God words.

[@aldenpadilla1773]

1+1+1=1 believers enjoying humiliation of bible 😂

[@human7914]

@@aldenpadilla1773 1×1×1=1. I hope your hollow brain can understand this.

[@isleohagger5455]

Ehrman gets absolutely owned by Carrier. Dillahunty gets owned by Bruggencate. Christianity gets owned by Tovia Singer. And all is well in Islam! 🙏

[@isleohagger5455]

We watch the non-believers and non-muslims fight each other 😂 We don't even have to do half the job. The truth speaks for itself 🙏

[@johnzuma4688]

At 10:25 Ehrman states that he believes that Jesus was crucified. With that Ehrman states that he believes that the Quran must be false.

[@thereisonlyone6357]

@ John Zuma, Someone was crucified but it was not Jesus. God would never humiliated his prophet like that. Historically, being crucified was set for criminals according to the Romans.

[@johnzuma4688]

@@thereisonlyone6357 So you believe you can speak for God??? If not then prove that Jesus did not die on the cross. Remember you make the claim you have to prove it. Do start by showing in the Quran who died instead of Jesus. If Jesus did not die on the cross, you are calling Jesus a liar. How will you explain that on judgement day?

[@thereisonlyone6357]

@@johnzuma4688 Quran 4: 157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.

[@thereisonlyone6357]

@@johnzuma4688 The belief that Jesus only appeared to be crucified and did not actually die predates Islam and is found in several Apocryphal and Gnostic Gospels.

[@johnzuma4688]

@@thereisonlyone6357 As we all know that the Gnostic's were heretics you are actually admitting that Islam is following some heretic false doctrine which has nothing to do with what God revealed in the Torah and the Gospel. So tell me, why do you believe that following Mohammed will get you to heaven. I seem to have missed the verses where Mohammed tells us that if we follow what Mohammed recited in the Quran will get anyone to heaven. But I am sure you can show me these verses that I missed. On the other hand, if Mohammed does not promise anyone that they will make it to heaven when following Mohammed's Quran, why would anyone follow him?

[@stewartross3732]

John 20:28 Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!"

[@pritam452]

@Mansoor Ahmad lol

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@ripbraincells5023]

When you say "OMG!" when you are surprised when you met someone you wouldn't think you would ever met anymore. Would that mean that person is your God? Nope.

[@TheOrthodoxAlbanian]

@Mansoor Ahmad “No dear” lol, get out of here you demon.

[@bestbest91]

@Mansoor Ahmad Why Jesus is God: Who is the First and the Last? (From the Quran) Surah 57:3: (referring to God) ‘He is the First and the Last…’ (From the Old Testament) Isaiah 44:6: Thus SAITH THE LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God (From the New Testament) Jesus says in Revelation 1:17: ‘…Fear not; I am the First and the Last’. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− Who can forgive sins? (From the Quran) Surah 3:135: ‘… and who can forgive sins except Allah ?...’ (From the Old Testament) Psalm 51:4: (‘Thee’ which means ‘You’ in Old English is referring to God) Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest. (From the New Testament) Jesus says in Mark 2:5: ‘…Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. Mark 2:10: But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− Who judges the nations? (From the Quran) Surah 22:56-57: sovereignty that Day is for Allah ; He will judge between them. So they who believed and did righteous deeds will be in the Gardens of Pleasure. And they who disbelieved and denied Our signs - for those there will be a humiliating punishment. (From the Old Testament) Joel 3:12: (God speaking) ‘…for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about.’ (From the New Testament) Jesus says in Matthew 25:31-32: When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− Who is the truth? (From the Quran) Surah 22:6: ‘…Allah is the Truth…’ (From the Old Testament) Psalm 31:5: (To God) Into thine hand I commit my spirit: thou hast redeemed me, O LORD God of truth. (From the New Testament) Jesus says in John 14:6: ‘…I am the Way, the Truth…’ −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− Who raises the dead? (From the Quran) Surah 22:7: ‘…Allah will resurrect those in the graves…’ (From the Old Testament) 1 Samuel 6: The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up. (From the New Testament) John 5:25-29: 25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the SON OF GOD: and they that hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− Does God share his glory? (From the Quran) Surah 57:1: Whatever is in the heavens and earth exalts Allah, and He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. (From the Old Testament) Isaiah 42:8: I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images. (From the New Testament) Jesus says in John 17:5: And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.

[@hullie7529]

Is it just me or Bart Ehrman just basically debunked all the Muslim narrative? Let's not forget, this is an atheist who denies the existence of God but many Muslims quote him constantly because they think it makes Christianity look bad, but I think they do it out of ignorance about his actual points. Maybe a video like this will show them the truth.

[@TheAbrahamMichaels]

Ye, I noticed it too - it seems like muslims are watching these videos on mute. Ehrman did more damage to islam than christianity, but muslims are celebrating as if this is a win for islam and loss for christianity xD

[@peaceinjesus5221]

@@TheAbrahamMichaels Yes, Muslims seem to be playing some sort of 'power game' of being in a competition with Christians who they have to 'fight' and 'defeat' (irrespective of any truth). If there is one verse in the entire Quran that proves to me that the Quran is FALSE it is Surah 4:157 and its claim that Jesus wasn't crucified.....what a blunder!!!

[@kanepane3461]

@@TheAbrahamMichaels In what sense? Do you want to make a point system? Bart clearly said -the Messiah is human -Jesus never thought himself as a divine being -Jesus never thought he exist before he was born. -the term son of god is not the literal son of God. 4 points for muslim He believes Jesus did died and buried. 1 point for christians, 1 point for muslim. Cause the bible didn't said he was buried, Jesus was place in a tomb blocked by a boulder while guarded by romans. He said Jesus never thought of himself born out of a virgin. 1 point for Historian and atheist. Do you want to continue??

[@TheAbrahamMichaels]

@@kanepane3461 If there is one thing wrong in the Quran, then everything collapses - christians dont believe in Bart Ehrman says, but muslims do, because he is critical of the bible. So if you believe in what he says - believe in everything and not just a few things. And he said that he does infact believe that Jesus died, so this goes against the Quran - so if you believe in Bart Ehrman, then it means that the Quran is false.

[@whatissatire8698]

@@kanepane3461 and then laughed at the idea man wrote a book and it’s considered the word of god, you’ll all already know that Quran stole verses from the Torah and gospels. I’m going to throw things back on Muslim toes and say “game of thrones books are free from contradicting and perfect books therefore are the word of god”

[@markscheepers9908]

I think Muhammad Hijab is secretly a Christian, no true Muslims would put his religion in these negative positions like he does. Great work Hijab.

[@prenom8793]

It's all what you find to say?

[@sondrameyer2816]

You must be a Christian for sure as they have a tradition of misunderstanding and they like to propagate confusion even to this day. That's why there's so many, many denominations and versions of the Bible. There's nothing negative in honest investigation. We don't have the concept you can't use you intellect or the "it's a mystery card".

[@markscheepers9908]

@@sondrameyer2816 I'm Messianic Jew. The confusion you are referring to is nothing more than freewill, something absent in Islam, so this is your misunderstanding not a Christian one. Denominations, stems out of human differences or disagreements, Christians have always exercised God's choice of freewill (Islam dictates). I have yet to find a Bible version that contradicts another on the Christian core doctrines, so they are not comparable to denominations in their differences (again freewill). So you say there is nothing "negative in honesty", what honesty are you referring to, based on the title of the video? Here again we have "human differences or disagreements" and one group attempting to prove it's point, what has this to do with honesty? Sounds more like trying to score brownie points with its own conclusions. I'm also assuming by "mystery" you are referring to the trinity ('tri' meaning 'three' and 'unity' meaning 'one')? From a Christian perspective this is a mystery and understandably so, else they would be claiming to know the incomprehensible God which Jesus himself claims "no man knows". I know Muslims claim to know God to the point that they know he can't be as complex as being one God that exists in three different 'persons'. Why, because the Muslim rational is, if human's can't explain it, it is impossible for God (the rational is, God can't be a mystery to man). Yet they also claim God is incomprehensible, but they don't really believe this else they would not confuse God's oneness with his nature (and that he is different from anything else. Omnipotence - God is all-powerful - everything consistent with God's nature is possible).

[@sondrameyer2816]

@@markscheepers9908 A rose by any other name...as the Bard said. A Messianic Jew is a Christian with the trappings of a Jew. A wolf in sheep's clothing. Which is the reason you know so much about Christianity and so little about Islam. Muslims believe in free will. Since you are Jewish, might I suggest you speak with a Rabbi. Rabbi Tovia Singer. He has spent his life helping persons such as yourself. He could teach you the Shema and it's meaning. Shalom

[@markscheepers9908]

@@sondrameyer2816 Okay, so you seem to refer to Ehrman as some type of god, and knower of all things, the man's a atheist (actually he can't make up his mind what he is). But incidentally he is a textual scholar so what does the man really know about Christian theology? He steers clear of these types of confrontations because he knows any good theologian will trash him on Biblical theology. I know enough about Islam to realize it consistently contradicts the Abrahamic God it claims to serve. God says don't, Allah says it's okay - God says 1 man 1 woman, Allah says 2, 3 or 4 etc. In your dreams Muslims have freewill, they certainly tell themselves they do, but they don't, they are under constant control (they have to pray like 7th century Arabs, grow a beard like one, dress like one etc.) - is this what you call freewill (if so, then you don't know what freewill is). As for Singer, the man's a fraud & a fool, who after 2000 years is still misleading Jews with his deceit & lies and it's doubtful he can help me, he needs to help himself first and free himself from his deceit & lies.

[@JamesSnappJr]

19:10 - "When David went into the temple . . . " Um, no. The temple was not built till later; David never saw the temple. Likewise regarding Abiathar and his father Ahimelech: it was stipulated in Mosaic Law (Leviticus 21) that a priest could be disqualified by suffering certain kinds of injury, yet still partake in some priestly duties. Abiathar simply being on the scene in I Samuel 21 does not automatically make him the acting high priest at the time, simple the senior priest. This is just one way to resolve the dispute that, sadly, led to Ehrman's loss of faith. I pray that he gets it back.

[@fedesetrtatio1]

David did go into the temple, the portable tabanacle was also the temple. You are confusing with the Temple of Solomon.

[@prime_time_youtube]

You are completely right.

[@ocerco93]

So you saying and mark and matthew do not contradict each other ? no gospels contradict each other ?? when it says ( for example i dont recall the exact number) that 10000 Pigs ran into a town, and in a another verse it says 2500 pigs instead of 10000, theres NO mistake or contradiction here ?? ( btw that ammount of pigs is unrealistic but anyways..)

[@fedesetrtatio1]

@@ocerco93 Your example is called a scribal error. A contradiction is when there is a theological difference. But the issue is the absence of contradiction does not prove divine revelation.

[@ocerco93]

@@fedesetrtatio1 God do not let « scribal error « to happen if this book was for the whole mankind until their exctinct... Jesus said « he came only for the lost sheep of Israel » this answer why the Bible hasn’t been protected, Jesus had a mission for restricted people and he did his job for the time being.

[@japhetcruz3266]

Luke 2:14 “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!”

[@azad1718]

All glory belongs to almighty God who created Adam without father and mother, eve without father and mother, who created Jesus in the womb of Mary without sperm from a man a Almost is absolute one without mommy or daddy son or daughter .

[@hxyzazolchak]

Peace be upon whoever follows the guidance

[@hocinesalaheddine6401]

@@hxyzazolchak سلام على من إتبع الهدى

[@noahwamalwa4385]

@@azad1718 Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@kuroyami84]

@@azad1718 Yes God created Jesus body

[@dbo514]

At the core it's nice to have these open discussions.

[@SecularKoranism]

I am still waiting for Hijab to ask a Christian how and why Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy.

[@JesusSaves349]

@@SecularKoranism Licking & kissing the vagina shaped Black Stone, are all Pagan rituals, which Muhamad adopted in Islam, saying kissing it erases sins. Abdools are Pagans.

[@SecularKoranism]

@@JesusSaves349 Muslims don't think the Kabbah is God.

[@JesusSaves349]

@@SecularKoranism Who dwells in the Kabba other than The Black Stone?

[@Malik007J]

@@JesusSaves349 you’re completely lost mate. What are you on about?😂😂 the kabah is the unified direction to where Muslims offer their prayers. We don’t worship the kabah, we worship the creator of the heavens and earth, 1 god who is Allah

[@suchisthismystery2814]

"And I don't buy it!" I couldn't agree with you more Bart.

[@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363]

In heaven no unclean person is allowed in, you are unclean if you have sinned just once like lying, stealing, sexual immorality, taking the Lord’s Name in vain, evil thoughts etc Jesus (God manifest in the flesh) can put his sinless righteousness on you since He died on the cross, rose from the dead so REPENT AND BELIEVE IN HIM TODAY.

[@CapeCobraa]

When Hijab gets frustrated he cuts off Bart, LOL. LOVE TO SEE IT! The look of frustration when its going South

[@Ttcopp12rt]

@kontemplashion Youre in denial 🤣

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

We must’ve not watched the same video. These comments are actually extremely eye opening.

[@SecularKoranism]

Hijab should get over his fear of asking Christians how Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy if they worship a dead Jew on a stick as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

[@wvw_one]

@@SecularKoranismNow imagine seeing Hijab daring to ask historians about the historicity of Aisha’s boyfriend/granpa and his personal diary/comic book; he doesn’t do it because he knows he would have his ass obliterated.

[@wvw_one]

@@SecularKoranismOr, imagine researching the absurdity of this clown shit called Kabbalah and Talmud. Now that would be interesting.

[@ragelessblood8830]

he didn't call himself God that would not mean he's not God - bart Hijab:*pretending to laugh while getting irritated *🤣🤣

[@lastprophet8338]

Good point, if I say I am God, it doesn’t make me God, if Jesus Christ didn’t call himself God, his attributes proved him to be God

[@rachelpelita8052]

JESUS said: " I and my Father are one. If you have seen me, you have seen HIM.

[@إلهانبنأحمد]

“I don’t think the historical jesus considered himself to be a divine being at all.” - bart ehrman

[@إلهانبنأحمد]

@@lastprophet8338 his attributes proved him to be god? like what, being limited physically, limited in knowledge?

[@lastprophet8338]

@@إلهانبنأحمد I will give you a few, first of all I want you to understand that Isa is a different person from Yeshua because Isa’s mother according to Muhammad was the daughter of Imran and the sister of Aaron Jesus Christ claimed to be the beginning and the end Jesus Christ was able raise dead which couldn’t do Jesus Christ resurrected and claimed to have power over death Jesus Christ gave life and everlasting life which only God can do Jesus Christ was holy and sinless and only God can be holy and sinless

[@ASIST-rq2ve]

Says that we shouldn't be assuming what God should and should not do. Goes on to reject God on the basis of the presence of 'evil' implying God shouldn't have done that.

[@israfilangel8062]

Also that was a Qur'anic argument from God himself not us humans..

[@nymgrace1227]

@@israfilangel8062 Amazing, Erhman has destroyed the Islamic version of Jesus in a few words, wow!

[@israfilangel8062]

@@nymgrace1227 lmo you're spamming the same comment everywhere! Lol he didn't destroy any version! what he actually destroyed was the bible's corrupted versions and that would end any argument from it and he also destroyed the false idea of jesus's being god in christianity, Hijab already told him we can have the discussion on the crucifixion next time, he was just trying to be professional as he hosted his guest for the first time but he in fact told him we do believe that a crucifixion took place but it was made to appear to them as even the bible points out in many occasions.

[@profanotherletter4346]

@@nymgrace1227 get a life troll

[@theaviationist.5719]

@@israfilangel8062 Hijab vs Bart Erhman on biblical history about the the Jesus crucifixion? Erhman is a real historian. He is a biblical professor. He is an expert in early Christianity etc. What will Hijab bring to the table? Just Islamic / religious apologetics? 🤣🤣😂😂

[@edward1412]

Dr. Bart Ehrman : “All the four gospel writers in some sense thought Jesus is God”. 🙏🏾✝️

[@Userdoesnotexit]

thats a weak statement lol if you dont have any original scripts from the original language .. whats the point.

[@edward1412]

@@Userdoesnotexit Where’s the original script? Was it chewed by the goat the chewed part of the Quran? It seems Muhammed wasn’t aware when during his time he acknowledged the Christian or Jew scriptures.

[@edward1412]

@Atheist Debunker Yeshua referred to His Father as YHWH, which is the true name of His Father. Worshiping the Father is simultaneously worshiping the Son because the Word ( Yeshua) is the eternal world of the Father. 1. The Son shares the same glory with the Father, even before the world began ( John 17:5). 2. We honour the Son just as we honour the Father ( John 5:23). 3. Yeshua said where two or more are gathered in His name, His is with them (Mathew 18:20). Only God is omnipresent. 4. Yeshua claimed to be Lord. John 13:13 5. Thomas referred to Him as God. John 20:28. 6. The Bible stated that He existed in the FORM of God before coming down to earth. The reason He was born of a virgin. The Eternal Word became flesh. Philippians 2:6 and John 1:1. 7. Yeshua forgave sins. Only God can forgive sins. Luke 7:48. 8. He will be the judge during judgement day. John 5:22 9. Because He is divine, He even existed before Adam, Abraham, etc. “Before Abraham was, I AM”.John 8:58 10. He says we should ask Him anything in His name during prayer. John 14:14. So, let me get this. He is in the form of God, He is the Word of God, He shares the same glory and honour with the Father, He forgives sins, He will be the judge on judgement, He is the ONLY person able to save and He answers prayers. Do you seriously believe such a being is just a man?

[@edward1412]

@Atheist Debunker Are you blind or you can’t read? Lol.

[@edward1412]

@Atheist Debunker “Eli, Eli Lama Sabachthani” or Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabacthani”. When Yeshua was on the cross, this was how He referred to His Father. Lol. “Eloi” is Aramaic. 😂😂😂

[@NathanKwadade]

Hijab: "blah blah blah blah!" Bart: "Yeah! I know and I don't buy it...." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jackjohn123]

🤣🤣

[@sjappiyah4071]

LOOOL 😂😂😂

[@mohammedasyraf3830]

Lol. May Allah guide Mohammed Hijab😂

[@MultiSpellforce]

Simply denial without argument is recognizing defeat so you can even say that you don't buy that your mother gave birth to you .Bad example made by Dr Bart ehrman taking unlearned approach

[@Voseo00]

@@MultiSpellforce the entire discussion is the arguments, the “I don’t buy it” is a conclusion based on what he presented against hijab.

[@evelynr3437]

Bart Ehrman 👉 9:22 👂 " i DO really think Jesus was crucified..." 15:05 👂 "... I think all of these gospel authors think in some sense Jesus is God..."

[@israfilangel8062]

(This is for Christians) It's both funny & ironic and hypocritical how some Christians are stuck on the part where the x-christian bart said "I believe he was crucified" but they ignore the fact that he said the bible is changed, edited (corrupted) which agrees with the Qur'anic view and this alone is sufficient to reject the bible's narrative, and they ignore where he said jesus didn't believe he was God which also agrees with the Qur'an and they ignore where he said jesus wasn't born of a virgin which contradicts the bible more since it's central based on jesus and they also ignore that bart does not believe in jesus's miracles thus he doesn't believe in the biblical narrative that jesus rose up in the 3rd day lol! So one question to the Christians if that's all what triggered you is bart "believing" in the crucifixion despite we also believe it took place but it was made to appear to them as if it was jesus.. so do you really think bart believes jesus rose up from the death after three days yes or no? Do you believe bart for saying jesus didn't believe he was God? Do you believe bart for saying jesus didn't perform any miracles? Do you believe bart for saying jesus wasn't born of a virgin? And most importantly do you believe in Bart's work and views that he said the bible was changed (corrupted) which will debunk everything written on it even the crucifixion itself!? So are you going to be consistent and take Bart's for everything he says? Huh!

[@frankjaeger9068]

@@israfilangel8062 I got to the part where you said ' but they ignore the fact that he said the bible is changed, edited (corrupted) which agrees with the Qur'anic view and this alone is sufficient to reject the bible's narrative,'' and laughed'. The Quran does nothing but love the Bible, it copies its stories, it even copies the apocrypha that Christians reject. Muhammad even put the Torah on a cushion and said i believe in he who revealed you. These Muslims keep referring to some kind of 'phantom Torah and Injeel' which they cannot prove exists. According to Bart the way we study history is that you look at all the sources available to you and there are roughly 10 sources for the Gospels there are also outside sources of the Bible which say Jesus was crucified, Therefor it must be true and when something that comes along later (the Quran) and contradicts it (he was not crucified) then that source is plainly false. Why dont you use your own standard for 'corruption'? why dont you use your own histoical method for 'corruption? you wont dare, you would not dream of it The Crucifixion is HISTIRCAL FACT thats what Bart is saying he also said he was DEAD AND BURIED you missed that part didnt you, not that he was 'made to appear' or that he was 'caught up to heaven' . We know he does not believe the resurrection so all your other points are moot because your the one that is inconsistent. The only way an atheist or a Muslim can refute Christianity is if you find Jesus' body

[@quij7ote222]

Bart Ehrman makes it clear that he is making historical statements only. He is not writing theological texts or making theological arguments. When the two are mixed, the world has unresolvable conflict. If a person needs for statements about Jesus or anyone else to be literally true to believe in their theology, they are caught in a confusion of 2 different languages making 2 different claims about reality. Ex.: Do I believe Jesus literally, factually, materially rose from the dead? No. Do I believe in the "truth" of the story? Yes, absolutely. I have theological "beliefs" about spiritual reality which do not rely on "scientific" facts about material reality.

[@israfilangel8062]

@@frankjaeger9068 You said "The Quran does nothing but love the Bible, it copies its stories, it even copies the apocrypha that Christians reject." The Qur'an speaks highly of the injeel which was the original revelation for the Messiah, not the "many" gospels that you have in your hands nowadays! And the Qur'an does not copy anything from the bible lol it was God himself who was bringing back the original stories and corrects some of the misinformation that were caused by corruption of the lying pens as the bible states too, also if the prophet copied it h wouldn't reject the crucifixion or other beliefs such as the son of god and so on if his intentions were to bring people to islam he would have copied everything even the errorsand contradictions, but no, it was a Revelation from God. And the same apocrypha you're talking about has some stories which are included in other synoptic gospels now does that make them copying the apocrypha too? Lol You saif "Muhammad even put the Torah on a cushion and said i believe in he who revealed you. These Muslims keep referring to some kind of 'phantom Torah and Injeel' which they cannot prove exists." I can already tell you were copying some texts online lol btw I even can hold the torah in my hands and say I believe in the one who revealed you" in referring to the original torah or to the some rulings that are in ine with Qur'an not necessarily everything in the one in my hands as the prophet also said "do not believe everything said in the bible also do not reject everything said in it Mishkat al-Masabih 155 He also said that the people of the Book used to read the Torah in Hebrew and expound it in Arabic to the Muslims, so God’s messenger said, “Neither believe nor disbelieve the people of the Book, but say, ‘We believe in God and what has been sent down to us... ’” Bukhari transmitted it. So that does not mean we believe everything said in it. And FYI the prophet said that because he pulled out a ruling from it which was revealed by God and the same ruling is found in the Qur'an on the punishement for adultery! Read the whole hadith! Also it's a fact that Christians don't have any new discoveries of those manuscripts in Arabian desert if you want to claim that those were the same as 4 thousand years ago moses's tablets then atleast bring them up for analysis. You said "According to Bart the way we study history is that you look at all the sources available to you and there are roughly 10 sources for the Gospels there are also outside sources of the Bible which say Jesus was crucified, Therefor it must be true" Most of them were built upon the biblical narrative by other christians Non of them is absolute on the crucifixion since even the biblical accounts are contradictory in many places such as the passover day and many other details also there many sources that states early Christians were in dispute on jesus crucifixion some of them didn't believe he was crucified just like Peter wrote that he saw jesus observing someone else's crucifixion on a tree, You said "The Crucifixion is HISTIRCAL FACT thats what Bart is saying he also said he was DEAD AND BURIED you missed that part didnt you, not that he was 'made to appear' or that he was 'caught up to heaven' " 1. Historical does not make it true as you can't really check who was on the cross it could be just made up since bart believes the bible was corrupted then someone can say well it's a made up story. 2. Jesus according to the bible was never buried lol bart got it wrong there check what the accounts say on the tomb! You said "We know he does not believe the resurrection so all your other points are moot because your the one that is inconsistent." No all my other points are facts too he does not believe jesus to be God nor born of a virgin nor perform miracles nor rose up in the 3rd day and this means that those must be made up then! Because if you read a story that says a man was crucified and rose up after 3days" and then you chose to believe the first sentence and reject the latter because of its miraculous way then this will really make you "CONSISTENT" and cherrypicking! You can't do that because you're putting the eyewitness or the anonymous writers in a bad position which is either they're delusional or just lying or being lied to in order to reject the rest of the story!! 😂 You said "The only way an atheist or a Muslim can refute Christianity is if you find Jesus' body" Lol based on your logic most of Historical figures must be resurrected because their body are not found due to being dissolved lol! We muslims believe that jesus was being lifted by the Angels to be saved from the resurrection unlike Atheists and jws who don't believe in that!

[@frankjaeger9068]

@@israfilangel8062 LOL there is no need for the long reply, as to your first comment to mine, notice that i said Muslims keep referring to a 'phantom Torah and Injeel. That means you must present an original to prove its corrupted you cannot just like you cannot prove the Quran came from one original source....Muhammad History is based on sources thats all we ever know about history, the very fact the Quran says Jesus was not crucified how can you trust it since prior UNBIBLICAL (meaning non bias) sources say he was, that means Jesus' freinds and his enimies said he was crucified and died and was buried, Islam simply pretends to be his friend and says he was not crucified. The point is that you said Bart said 'he BELIEVES' (when he also said he thinks) he was crucified but then......I said YOU did not point out that he also said he was 'DEAD AND BURIED' ... this is where you lose this is why Bart AND Christians laugh at Islam and your mere human prophet

[@vanHoey]

M. Hijab interrupted a lot, which was unfortunate, because I was eager to hear what Bart had to say, and to learn from him.

[@iamhusain94]

It was his show. He has the right to counter any answer. You can definitely saw more of Dr. Bart on his own YT channel. He would appreciate it!!

[@samshamounthedog1420]

A you hungry 😋

[@LightForxes]

@@iamhusain94 Then don’t host a debate if you’re gonna act like a dipshit. Whether if it’s his show or not. Wait for your opponent to finish then you answer and vice-versa that’s how a proper debate is conducted. Hijab needs classes for that??

[@jonathanlatchman3301]

@@LightForxes this wasn't even a debate

[@dyawr]

@@iamhusain94 Or Mojab can learn to give people space...

[@gregoriusbonupas4435]

I must admit. When i started watching this I was a christian. But now after watching all this I must conclude that I am even MORE Christian than before. Thanks Hijaby

[@shorefulislam6902]

So do you believe Jesus is God?

[@Why-yc1eu]

Same

[@shorefulislam6902]

@@jooo7011 so whats wrong with this verse?

[@shorefulislam6902]

@@jooo7011 Dhu'l Qarneyn was a pious man, a great warrior and a traveller who created the wall between a certain people and Gog and Magog. Now tell me, what's wrong with this verse.

[@shorefulislam6902]

@@jooo7011 @Joo O Quran is book from God which is revealed to Prophet Muhammad, then if it is describe any historical event then you have to admire, yes it is from God, just simple. If you can't prove it with historical evidence then you don't have any right to say it is wrong, just proving u r a stupid, thats it. And that verse you mentioned, you don't even know the contex. Did you ever try to find the context of that verse? I think never. That verse is portrait the environment as Dhul qarnayeen's perception. Totally metaphorical verse with a poetry. Even an idiot will understand that this is metaphorical sentence because you are talking about that book which already described so many astronomical things. Use ur brain, it is free.

[@johnzuma4688]

In 12:12 Ehrman states that according to the Gospel Jesus says that He is God. So here we have a Bible scholar who states that in the Gospel Jesus says that He is God.

[@Sheragust]

Yes and he also said that it's ahistorical and Jesus actually believed himself to not be God and that the Messiah is meant to be a human, which is 100% the Islamic belief so are you going to cherry pick ?

[@johnzuma4688]

@@Sheragust You seem confused, how can one come to a historical conclusion that one cannot back up with historical facts? The relevant point is that in the Gospel Jesus said that he is God. And of course Ehrman confirmed that Jesus certainly died on the cross. And that is 100% against what Mohammed taught. So are you going to cherry pick?

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@osb7948]

@@johnzuma4688 Did you even watch this video? Why did you choose to ignore what he said from 12:20 onwards? Lol it’s literally right there and he said this numerous times in his book. Him saying that a gospel writer (whom he also says are unknown and pseudonymous) making the claim that Jesus claimed to be God isn’t the same as saying the historical Jesus claimed to be God. The Quran’s view on the crucifixion is very clear. The Quran states the following: “And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.” 4:157 The verse clearly states that it appeared to them that they had indeed crucified him, therefore it makes sense that there is a historical claim that Jesus was crucified. Given that there is a historical claim of crucifixion, a naturalist historian like Ehrman will obviously accept that. He doesn’t believe in the supernatural, he doesn’t believe in revelation and he doesn’t believe in God. So it makes perfect sense that he’d just go with the naturalist explanation of the historical claim of crucifixion being what actually happened rather than the Muslim claim of God intervening and the supernatural occurrence of the messiah being saved (which btw is very clearly prophesied in the Old Testament). You really think Hijab doesn’t know this? You think he brought Ehrman on to proof Islam’s view on the crucifixion? How about instead of making silly claims you instead focus on where a naturalist historian like Ehrman’s views do line up with the Quran. That the Bible has undoubtedly been corrupted, edited and that the originals are no longer extant, that the authors are unknown men with pseudonyms and the avalanche of evidence against biblical inerrancy that almost every single biblical scholar attests to. It’s funny how most Christians in the comments (the vast majority of whom believe in biblical innerancy) ignore this and instead focus on some straw man argument that wasn’t even being made.

[@johnzuma4688]

@@osb7948 Of course I watched the video or how would I have known where Ehrman told us all that Islam is false? And obviously what Ehrman believes without proof about Jesus does not change what Ehrman knows based on the proof he got. So Ehrman “believes” that Jesus did not consider himself a divine being, but Ehrman “knows” from the evidence he has that Jesus was crucified and that he was buried. That logically proves nothing about what Jesus was or what he thought he was, but it proves from the evidence that Mohammed got it wrong which makes Mohammed’s Quran wrong. The difference being in what Ehrman believes which is pure speculation compare to what he knows based on the evidence he has. So did you not listen to what Ehrman says from 12:20 onwards or did you not understand what he said? You say that the Quran view on the crucifixion is very clear. I fully agree with you on that. And that of course proves that the Quran is false which means it is not from God which means that Mohammed was a false prophet and a liar. By implication this is exactly what Ehrman states as well. And the “it appeared to them” means that Mohammed is calling God a liar which again proves that Mohammed was never a prophet of our Almighty God of the Bible because our Almighty God does not lie. So have you not read the Bible that you do not know this? And of course we have have dozen of eye-witnesses who saw that Jesus died on the cross and we only have Mohammed 600 years after the event who says something different. Now why would anyone believe what an obvious liar said 600 years after an event happened? Of course Hijab knows this but you really think he can give up his position on Islam? You say the Bible has been corrupted according to Ehrman. Please show me the evidence where Ehrman states that the theology (ie what the Bible teaches) has been corrupted? You say that the Bible has been corrupted. In Surah 3:3 we read that the Torah and the Gospel which are the two major parts of the Bible were revealed by God which makes them the Word of God as that is how God reveals. And in Surah 6:115 we read that none can change the Word of God. So if as you claim the Bible has been corrupted then logically you are admitting that the Quran must be false. So tell me why do you follow a book that according to you must be false? And do explain which one of the many different Arabic Qurans we can buy you follow? And why that Quran? As we can all read in the Qurans (plural) that Mohammed claimed that his allah would guard, yet the many different Arabic Qurans we can buy clearly show that the Quran has been corrupted. So who is the liar here? Was Mohammed or was it his allah? Or is Mohammed’s allah so weak that he cannot keep his promise about guarding his Quran? And do tell us all, why do you believe that following Mohammed will get anyone to heaven?

[@jesushasrisen4907]

Mimi’s Hijab’s face almost caused me to spit my drink out with so much laughter 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣great job Dr Bart Ermhan

[@sjappiyah4071]

LOOOL his face when Bart Ehrman affirmed Jesus’s death via cruxifiction occurred was hilarious 😂

[@thatbloke4335]

@@sjappiyah4071 this is the face christians get when jesus comes back and denies he is God, then proceeds to break their cross

[@baylan9120]

​@@thatbloke4335 You don't even believe in the same Jesus as us.

[@johnw7657]

@@thatbloke4335 Only if you believe in your garbage book.

[@muhammadaaus105]

A man was made to resemble Jesus and he was crucified, Jesus was Raised in the heavens (skies) above by Allāh.

[@josephinemcguinness9340]

Unto us a child is born and the government shall be upon his shoulders, he shall be called wonderful counsellor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. His Royal Power will continue to grow, his kingdom will always be at Peace. ISAIAH CHAPTER 9 VERSE 6 AND 7.

[@faiz8830]

What's this? Is this suppose to be Jesus?

[@kamalp1451]

why is there a problem with isaiah?

[@mennavanessa]

So you believe in the Old Testament? Where the jews rejects this supposed god!

[@kamalp1451]

@@mennavanessa are you atheist like bart

[@maronanabalat5177]

So jesus, is, the father or the son! 🤔

[@asormullet7176]

But the problem for Muhammad Hijab in this interview,Erhman believed that Jesus was crucified and Jesus claimed to be God!

[@cutlermason3543]

12:10 that’s the best Christians have to support your claim, which is according to the words of anonymous authors who never even knew Jesus and wrote it many years after his lifetime in only the LAST gospel so incredibly different from the rest that many scholars even call it the “spiritual gospel” because of how much it lacks in authenticity and legitimacy and historical accuracy but rather only provides theological claims according to Dr. Ehrman here 15:13. it’s strange at best and even laughable that you can undoubtedly believe that over the AUTHENTIC words of the earliest Christians who were closer to the time of Jesus like the ebionites who never worshiped him and like the Unitarian Christians that have existed to this day far longer than trinitarians and even over modern scholars so well-versed and highly educated on this topic with decades of learning like Bart Ehrman who disproves your claim right away here 12:20.

[@cutlermason3543]

12:20 this LITERALLY makes your comment false. In terms of logic, chronology, history and every other sensible observations, Jesus never claimed to be divine, all according to real experts among Unitarians and the earliest Christians/scholars and modern scholars like Bart Ehrman who literally says “I DONT THINK THE HISTORICAL JESUS CONSIDERED HIMSELF TO BE A DIVINE BEING AT ALL!” So the only way you can continue to believe Jesus may be divine is by blind faith ALONE, which would make sense if coming from a Christian who continues to believe in books with tons of contradictions/errors as Dr. Ehrman points out here 17:18 and if that describes you, then according to Dr. Ehrman you have already made up your mind therefore you are academically disingenuous and lack enough integrity for any further intellectual dialogue from me because you will always refuse facts. Good day.

[@galihajat4352]

U didnt watch all the video asor?

[@M414-q6o]

You do realize Jesus appearing to be crucified historically is exactly how the Quran describes it? He APPEARS to be crucified to of course that's how it would appear historically. Its so obvious, I don't know how its possible to miss that. Also He literally just said historical Jesus never claimed to be God 12:10, Did any of the Christians in this comment section watch the video? His entire point is only John has claims of Jesus being God and none of the others have those claims.

[@billyoga807]

@@cutlermason3543 Ebionites rejected virgin birth too. Why the cherry pick? Unitarianism first developed in the reformation. Heretics in the early Christians believe in Jesus divinity (perhaps except Ebionites) n not to mention no notable scholars believe Jesus wasn't crucified

[@millier9658]

Jesus all the way.

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

Amen

[@samueljohn6937]

Amen

[@sneezystudios5856]

Amen

[@realt1984]

Jesus all the way to where?

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

@@realt1984 for the salvation and Heaven

[@hithummah]

muslims: the concept of trinity contradicts every logic and norms known also muslims: Allah is beyond our mortal logic and norms

[@roxanne2749]

Should I give answer to your logic? I'm confused that will it be a time waste to answer your dim logic. You tell what to do?

[@roxanne2749]

Ello

[@5xmasterx548]

😂😂

[@akin1989]

Indeed

[@Ash_Queen16]

@kontemplashion Why? Jews aren’t trying to convert us.

[@sikeajax]

Ehrman: “The law of non contradiction is not written into reality… Hijab: then if we do this logical skepticism.. what your doing and what I’m doing will collapse”

[@ic6177]

Someone was paying attention.

[@Colls-m8i]

Very redundant statement on Hijab’s part…childish excuse

[@trinitarianchampion]

I used to parrot the Bart Ehrman destroyed the Bible argument back in the day when I was a Muslim. Now I am a Christian.

[@MrIslamdeen]

🤣

[@ilhamhatami2477]

How many rukus in Surah Fatiha?

[@cindylou3524]

@@ilhamhatami2477 there are none

[@natsutsunarei5698]

Who’s the current caliph

[@shaykrabbijacksom4715]

Hijab always exposes his own cult! 😂

[@idao8990]

The funny thing he doesn't notice that lol nor his stupid followers! Stupidity is amazing indeed.

[@abdelrhman7628]

early christians said he wasn’t crucified

[@Yegwy]

​@abdelrhman7628 who???

[@Yegwy]

​@@abdelrhman7628 Haven't you heard what Bart said it's an historical fact he was crucified

[@abdullahtahir9622]

​@@YegwyEbionites

[@dachosen7368]

Muhammad hijab is clearly depressed by this interview especially when Bart said it's a historical fact that Jesus was crucified

[@lonsky29]

Thats a nail in the coffin there which hijab and the rest of the muslims disputes

[@livinia296]

Quran:4:157-158 "it was made to appear to them so".

[@robynwright520]

Right there Quran got Busted... Case closed

[@livinia296]

@@robynwright520 Really!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@mohamedab9033]

@@robynwright520 But the Qur'an confirms a crucifixion took place, are you not reading or listening? It just claims "JESUS" was not the one who got crucified, that it appeared to them as so. Doesn't contradict history whatsoever

[@Contenthouseyt]

Beautiful discussion. I’m glad I watched it, very captivating from both sides!

[@ripbraincells5023]

@Jon Doe An x-cristian scholar of the highest eminence in biblical study who became an agnostic by deep learning the bible, and a learned muslim. You can donate, or not. Why fret? He doesn't even force anyone to donate to him. There are peoples who want to donate for his cause. And he give them a way for them to donate. So?

[@johnzuma4688]

@@ripbraincells5023 You seem confused, Bart Ehrman is an atheist not an agnostic. And according to Bart Jesus existed, according to the Gospel Jesus called Himself God and Jesus was crucified and died on the cross and He was buried. That of course contradicts what Islam teaches about Jesus. So lets hope Hijab actually learnt something.

[@ripbraincells5023]

@Jon Doe Ha? Please speak human. Lol.

[@oluwafemijoseph2830]

@@johnzuma4688 as a Christian I don’t believe what Bart says about Xtianity, however Hijab in his malicious motive to discredit the person and historicity of Jesus Christ got pummeled by Bart. Bart practically debunked the many claims of Islam from virgin birth, to death and Quran inerrancy..

[@johnzuma4688]

@@oluwafemijoseph2830 I agree you. Yet it seems that most Muslims do not even realize that Ehrman destroyed Islam.

[@hmong-tung3189]

Jesus did not think he was God,He knows He is God!

[@noahwamalwa4385]

ABSOLUTELY if you read the synoptic gospels in a horizontal manner, it is clear Jesus claimed both Messiah and Son of God. Jews understood Son of God to be equal to God. Bcoz otherwise y shld they consider Jesus claim to be blasphemous?? Matthew 26:63 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death. Luke 22:70 They all asked, “Are you then the Son of God?” He replied, “You say that I am.” Then they said, “Why do we need any more testimony? We have heard it from his own lips.” Mark 14:60 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do yo nou think? And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death. Matthew 16:16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”.... Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my father. ... Jesus ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. John 10:32 Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? ......33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, , because you, a mere man, claim to be God.” We observe that Messiah is often being mentioned in conjunction with the Son of God and is being considered by the Jews to be blasphemous because it amounted to be claiming equality with God

[@benazirsyedi1663]

Yeah that's why he constantly have to talk & pray to some one else.... why was he doing so if he knew everything❓ Why is he in need of a father❓ Can't be GOD.

[@benazirsyedi1663]

@@noahwamalwa4385 In Holy Bible GOD got sons by the tons.... why only Jesus Christ pbuh only considered as the only son❓

[@tazmanrehman]

Jesus was the messenger of God on return of Jesus the blessed man of heaven's will tell you they were created by the One God ☝️

[@brotherpax1353]

@@tazmanrehman Jesus is part of the one God

[@petersayers4843]

you can only debate in the manner of what is before you. when presented with a calm, knowledgable and intelligent counterpart you unavoidably will be well mannered and respectful also but when you have a howling maniac then you have to take a more aggressive stance. dr ehrman is a very good guest to have (almost makes up for the dr peterson withdrawal).

[@johnzuma4688]

How do you know that Peterson ever agreed to a discussion? Just because Hijab said this does not necessarily make it so.

[@glenntasky58]

@@johnzuma4688 I know Hijab personally, he would never make this up, not in a million years.

[@johnzuma4688]

@@glenntasky58 I do not know Hijab at all, so I will remain skeptical. And logically why would an internationally renown professor like Peterson decide to have a YT discussion with a basically unknown person like Hijab?

[@glenntasky58]

@@johnzuma4688 Well, that's subjective! I don't think Hijab is unknown person to be honest. In their own society (muslims) he is well-known, respected and more famous then Peterson.

[@amadrahim9023]

@Jon Doe how about just 2 people that disagree having a decent polite convo you complete ignorant knobb who said he was on anyones side people can disagree and still maintain a level of respect

[@advancedadam.7699]

Look at muslims faces when bert said JESUS DIED AND WAS BURIED.(knowing its in the core tenets of islam that jesus did not die) hahahahah.. mimi hijab just put another knife on islams heart.

[@kalsoumkhan6648]

lol where do you guys get such assumptions 😂 Just cos you get butt hurt on hearing the truth, we are a people of logic and truth and such discussions are helpful for building bridges, we can agree to disagree unlike you people of blind faith

[@daness621]

How can you say or Erhman say without a doubt that Jesus died if you’re basing your knowledge of such things on a book that he himself says is unreliable, has discrepancies and contradictions.

[@safiamuse5060]

According to the quran "it appeared to to the people that jesus died, and crucified, how it happened only Allah knows, but for certainty this did not happened, bart ermam he is only knows what the Christian's know regarding the crucifixion, and so the Quranic position still stands, and even if this happen it means nothing to one's salvation

[@JesusSaves349]

@@kalsoumkhan6648 Logical man, how is Allah created? “When God Almighty wanted to create Himself, He created the horse first and let it gallop till it sweated. Then He created Himself from its sweat (Imam Suyuti, Al L’ali al Masnu’a fi AlAhadeeth al Maudu’a)

[@salehabualy6178]

I feel absurd when I find Christians happy with a dead and buried God Where is the mind, people?

[@dantejager9296]

Paul converted 2-3 years after the Resurrection of Jesus, he knew the brother of Lord Jesus and apostle Peter who all knew the Lord personally. Thus Paul can tell us more correctly about Jesus then Quran can ever dream of. Bart buried Hijab. God guide us to the Truth, in the name of Jesus we pray. Amen.

[@samshamounthedog1420]

We don’t have any writings from Peter and Paul has nothing to do with Jesus..what did Paul see on the road to Damascus

[@peaceinjesus5221]

Amen - tell the truth!

[@samshamounthedog1420]

@@peaceinjesus5221 what truth princess..can you please explain thanks

[@samshamounthedog1420]

@@peaceinjesus5221 what did Paul see on the road to Damascus..

[@lupus5338]

@@samshamounthedog1420 The Gospel of John was written by one of the apostles of Jesus. (John, lol) Also all the gospels were written with some kind of ocular witness.

[@smh7192]

Just a suggestion: I think it would be better if MH has the screen in front of him as Mr Ehrman so he can be facing the camera when speaking

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

The probable reason as to why Mark says it was in the days of "Abiathar" is that Abiathar was better known than Ahimelech. The son of the high priest was regarded as his successor, and was often associated with him in the duties of his office. It was not improper, therefore, to designate him as high priest even during the life of his father, especially as that was the name by which he was afterward known. "Abiathar," moreover, in the calamitous times when David came to the throne, left the interest of Saul and fled to David, bringing with him the ephod, one of the special garments of the high priest. For a long time, during David's reign, he was high priest, and it became natural, therefore, to associate "his" name with that of David; to speak of David as king, and Abiathar the high priest of his time

[@Floyd308]

Still, father or son, they are two different people.

[@davidgiraldoguiral1022]

@@Floyd308 still, who has denied that fact, trinitarian Christians have always existed since of the times of the Apostles and they've always been the majority...

[@jesussavedme2213]

Exactly 2 Samuel 8:17. Like what the heck!!!!???? U know what he was just finding an excuse to leave. At the end he says what every other atheist says “ oh I, I just can’t believe thrs a God that just let’s all the suffering happen!” Jesus warned us, “ In the world u have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world 🌎 “ John 16:33. So maybe he skipped that class or was absent that day.

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

@@jesussavedme2213 Exactly , Amen. Jesus said we are going to suffer . That's the Stupid excuse for not believing in God .

[@jesussavedme2213]

@@Akhil_Chilukapati yes. It is awful. It’s not easy. Look at these countries that refuse to accept Christ or even the Bible to b even read or even to b provided. I can’t even imagine the horror that happens thr. In the west where the Bible is permitted, we have freedom & most of the time a calmer life. Yes, stuff still happens, but I say, nothing compared to these other countries. Yes, no, maybe?🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️ agree/ disagree?

[@hus-zus]

I dont know if Bart Ehrman will read this comment. But he should reconsider his own argument as he contradicted himself. He said first he doesnt believe in God because of suffering. So he has projected his own assumption an idea of God to deny him. Yet later on he said along lines, how can we speak on God and what God has to do. So then why do you assume that God cant allow suffering for a wisdom?

[@EuphoricPlaz]

Thats a good thing to point out.

[@islamdefenderyahya4621]

He Forget that we Are Here on a Trial .. Honestly i Find Him a Bit silly & Lost

[@israfilangel8062]

Also that was a a criteria and Qur'anic argument from God himself not us humans..

[@srnp0007]

@@islamdefenderyahya4621 :- He Forget that we Are Here on a Trial ........." What do you mean ? What trial ?

[@itubemember]

@@srnp0007 there is a very common perception, that some Christians share, that our life on this earth is like taking something to a proving ground. The decision is binary: either it is approved and justified, or it not.

[@fieldmarshal763]

At 15.12 Bart Ehrman said.... "I think ALL these Gospel authors THINK Jesus is God in some sense, but John went a little further....." He agrees that Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar yet distinct but not necessarily CONTRADICTORY! Bart Ethman also said that....the crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ are historically correct. Why is Bart Ethman not a Christian today? He answered.......he doesn't believe there is a God out there and human suffering here on earth NOT because there is contradiction in the bible or the historicity of Jesus crucifixion, death and resurrection are false! How does this interview help the Muslim case and course? Zero help, rather destructive like the Mr "Holes in the Standard Narratives" interview. Mohammed Hijab has a penchant for destroying Islam unknowingly. If a foolish atheist can research and come to a conclusion that the crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ are proven historical facts; then Mohammed and allah are the only DONKEYS to deny these proven facts. Sorry for insulting donkeys, they are even more intelligent and knowledgeable than Mohammed and allah in the Koran. Actually, Mohammed doesn't deny crucifixion, he stupidly denied Iesa was not the one on the cross but another person whom allah made to APPEAR to the Jews that Iesa was on the cross; making allah the BEST OF THE DECEIVERS whom Christians recognise as The Old Serpent (The Devil) Psalms 14.1 calls Bart Ethman a FOOL and that is what he is, otherwise he should know that Christians believe Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man. Matthew, Mark and Luke focused more on Christ's humanity.....his genealogy, his birth, baptism, ministry, crucifixion, death, resurrection and the Great commission with a little touch on his DIVINITY whereas John focused more on His DIVINITY and less of his humanity. So as long as Ethman agrees that Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar but distinct yet not contradictory; how does John contradict Matthew, Mark and Luke when John's focus is on Christ's divinity? I think Mohammed Hijab should be interviewing crooks like Dr Atalie who will try all deceptive tactics to bend all linguistic and geographical jargons to fix Mohammed in Isaiah 42, Deut 18 and even in the gospel of John of all books. Bart Ehrman is not a positive cause and course for Islam, he is actually a bad news for Islamic religion for affirming the crucifixion, death and resurrection of Christ as historical events thereby making allah the idiot of the kaaba. Lastly, the title of the discussion portrays these two as hybrid donkeys. It's like asking if a man thinks he is a man or a donkey think he is a donkey. Jesus knew who he was, he knew he came from above; It's the humans that did not know him well which prompted him to ask......Who do men think I am? Question answered....he asked: Who do you think I am? The second question.....Who do you think I am? is a UNIVERSAL and PERSONAL question that EVERYONE of us must answer. Myself and all Christians follow the bible and affirm that Jesus is God......Emmanuel (God with us ) in the flesh. Muslims can follow the god of the kaaba and its bewitched prafet's narrative that he is a mere prophet like other prophets. Atheists can answer the question by denying his existence or accepting his existence and denying his divinity.......the resurrection morning 🌄 will declare our correctness.

[@King_David794]

Perfect summary brother. This interview totally destroyed Islam to the core. Everything Bart Said went against the quran . This is a bigger problem than the holes in standard narrative 😬😬

[@legend-mj4gv]

✝️❤️

[@enesog]

People ....... Jesus is not god. That's it.

[@oluwafemijoseph2830]

@@enesog no he isn’t god. You are right. He is GOD🤪😜

[@oluwafemijoseph2830]

@@King_David794 right !! In his malicious motive to bash the person of Jesus Christ , allah got the beating instead…. For the essence of Christianity is the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour to which Bart agrees with… not that we need him to affirm it . The gospels are sufficient ..

[@aerobins12994]

17:15 would also apply to Muslims. Or any religious group for that matter. The proof is the comment section lol. I've seen plenty of "the Quran has no mistakes" comments. Which to Ehrmans point, theyd dismiss anyone who brought a supposed mistake to them.

[@aerobins12994]

@Ahmed Ali you've proved my point

[@shekoo1609]

Thank you for the invitation.

[@BananaYT]

Lmao biggest embrassment to hijab, tried to use a atheist against Christianity and ends up backfiring at Islam 😂😂🤣🤣 man these Muslims

[@danialassyrian4867]

Without lies the cult of muhammed dies

[@mizanulkarim7648]

Coping much? Did you watch the full discussion?

[@DIABOLICAL-6]

​@@mizanulkarim7648 That's what happened.

[@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363]

@@DIABOLICAL-6 In heaven no unclean person is allowed in, you are unclean if you have sinned just once like lying, stealing, sexual immorality, taking the Lord’s Name in vain, evil thoughts etc Jesus (God manifest in the flesh) can put his sinless righteousness on you since He died on the cross, rose from the dead so REPENT AND BELIEVE IN HIM TODAY.

[@DIABOLICAL-6]

@@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 You must take sahada or Allan will have you in his 🏠.

[@patrickngunjiri5340]

So Bart doesn't think that the Bible was not corrupted as per the Islamic narrative and also affirms that there's no contradiction in the Bible but differences which could be true...he also trusts that the Bible is historical,

[@KoolaidGC3]

Yeah in the apostate prophet interview he said the Bible isn’t corrupted necessarily, just many minor scribal errors

[@SohoNights]

Hopefully Muslims will now stop incorrectly citing Bart Erdman

[@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363]

In heaven no unclean person is allowed in, you are unclean if you have sinned just once like lying, stealing, sexual immorality, taking the Lord’s Name in vain, evil thoughts etc Jesus (God manifest in the flesh) can put his sinless righteousness on you since He died on the cross, rose from the dead so REPENT AND BELIEVE IN HIM TODAY.

[@NathanKwadade]

A few things to take away from this interview as asserted by Bart: 1. Jesus Christ existed 2. Jesus Christ believed He was the messiah. 3. Jesus Christ was indeed crucified 4. The Bible is inspired by GOD These statements all support the core tenets of the Christian faith.

[@sjappiyah4071]

Amen

[@911beats]

Lol, is that what you got.... 1. Jesus did not claim to be God 2. Bible is corrupted 3. Bible has Contradictions 4. The messiah was never seen as divine

[@theastronomer5800]

I don't see how you reach a conclusion that Dr. Ehrman asserts that the Bible is inspired by god? Did I miss that somewhere? I have read most of his books and listened to most of his debates. He might claim that the authors or theologians claim that the Bible is inspired by god, but since he does not believe in god then I don't see why he would say that. If you take that away, 1-3 can be applied to any person and it does not mean that Jesus was divine in any way.

[@sjappiyah4071]

@@911beats Lol try listening again 1. Jesus claimed to be God in John, and all the gospels claim Jesus is God in some sense 2. Not relevant as the theme of discussion is *which faith is accurate concerning JESUS* not textual accuracy 3. Once again not relevant 4. Christianity doesn’t say Jesus *must* be divine because he’s the messiah, so that’s an irrelevant point. Rather we believe Jesus was divine and was the messiah simultaneously. Now, why not actually pay attention to Bart’s statements relevant to the topic 1) Jesus *died* via cruxifiction 2) All of our earliest sources about Jesus claim that Jesus was God in some sense 3) Paul was a legitimate follower of Jesus, who met Jesus’s brother, and who’s teachings were affirmed by them. Seems like that poses serious problems to the Islamic view on Jesus 😂

[@sjappiyah4071]

@@theastronomer5800 1-3 isn’t arguing that Jesus is divine. 1 is arguing against mythicists, and 3 is arguing against the Islamic position that Mohammed Hijab asserts

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

Thank you for the interview Mohammad Hijab . You have exposed your faith more by interviewing him. 😂💯

[@kanepane3461]

In what sense? Do you want to make a point system? Bart clearly said -the Messiah is human -Jesus never thought himself as a divine being -Jesus never thought he exist before he was born. -the term son of god is not the literal son of God. 4 points for muslim He believes Jesus did died and buried. 1 point for christians, 1 point for muslim. Cause the bible didn't said he was buried, Jesus was place in a tomb blocked by a boulder while guarded by romans. He said Jesus never thought of himself born out of a virgin. 1 point for Historian and atheist. Do you want to continue??

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

@@kanepane3461 Offcourse , Messiah is God revealed in the form of Human . He was just saying according to the History , History doesn't speak much about a person specifically in detail but it depends upon the historian who writes it - He wrote what he believes about him . But the Gospels which are historically Realiable tells About Jesus in a detail way . The Old testament is clear about the Messiah . Messiah has to be God in the Old testament . a) The Messiah is from the Ancient of days . “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel,whose origins are from of old,from ancient times.” (Micah 5:2) “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. (Daniel 7:13) b) The Child going to born is called as "Mighty God " For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. (Isaiah 9:6) c) Jesus is portrayed as a Saviour in many places in the New testament . But God says : I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from me there is no savior. (Isaiah 43:11) Messiah is going to be a saviour . If Jesus is Saviour he's god because there's no other Saviour besides God . 2. Jesus claimed that he was existed before . a)Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. (John 17:3) b) “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” (John 8:58) 3) Even we don't believe Son of God means literal biological son of God . 4) It's historically Realiable that Jesus was crucified on the cross . History doesn't say that "He died for our sins and all " Historian doesn't mention all those theologically but the Gospels mention in detail . Christ Crucifixion is the historically valid and that disproves Islam . 5) why does the History mentions his thoughts ? Lol How does the historian knows his personal thoughts ? Did the historian interviewed jesus about his thoughts? Jesus was born to a Virgin according the prophecy . 6) the word "Buried"when he said doesn't mean he was buried under the groud . At the place where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had ever been laid. (John 19:41) Why was jesus crucifed ,Ehrman says He was crucified because he claimed to be king . That's not the actual reason infact they were waiting for the King . He was crucified because he claimed to be God . “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.” (John 10:33) For example , did Historians said about Muhammed fully about him ? Did they say Muhammad received Revelation from allah ? No write , then why do you believe? Historians only write what they know and what they believe about that particular person , Understand? Historian writes historically not theologically.

[@paschal1350]

It backfired 😀😀😀, which means their book is lying too

[@kanepane3461]

@@Akhil_Chilukapati He goes by the bible and history to present the most accurate historical Jesus possible. As for your other absurd claims. Old testament is explicitly clear that: God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? (Numbers 23:19) I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim: for I am God, and not man; the Holy One in the midst of thee: and I will not enter into the city.(Hosea 11:9) And they began to accuse him, saying, We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself is Christ a King.(Luke 23:2) Yes he was crucified for being having claimed to be king and its in the bible. Try again.

[@Akhil_Chilukapati]

@@kanepane3461 Numbers 23:19 says God is not a Man . Offcourse God is not always a Man.But He can reveal himself as a Man. a) God revealed himself as a Man to wrestle with Jacob . 28 Then the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with humans and have overcome.” 29 Jacob said, “Please tell me your name.” But he replied, “Why do you ask my name?” Then he blessed him there. 30 So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, “It is because I saw God face to face, and yet my life was spared.” (Genesis 32:28-30) b) God walks as a Man And they heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden. (Genesis 3:8) c) Lord was standing before Abraham as a Man . but Abraham remained standing before the Lord. (Genesis 18:22) d) God eats with Abraham and Sarah in Genesis 18:1-15 For example in Exodus 3 , God revealed himself as Burning Bush . So does that mean God is always Burning Bush? No right ,Just like that He Can reveal himself as a Man and he did it in the old testament and he did revealed himself as a Man in the name of Jesus in the New testament too . 2) Why Jesus was crucified ? Jesus answered, “If I tell you, you will not believe me, 68 and if I asked you, you would not answer. 69 But from now on, the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the mighty God.” 70 They all asked, “Are you then the Son of God?” He replied, “You say that I am.” 71 Then they said, “Why do we need any more testimony? We have heard it from his own lips.” But they kept shouting, “Crucify him! Crucify him!” (Luke 22 :68-71, 23:21) What did they understood when they he said "He's Son of God" not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God. (John 5:18) Offcourse the MessiahofIsrael is going to be a King and All jews were waiting for that King . That's not the reason why Jesus was crucified . Jesus was crucified because he claimed to be God . “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.” (John 10:33) In the last comment you quoted a verse that says about Accusing about because he's a king but the Jews were coming up with lies to accuse Jesus at any cost . For example : 29 So Pilate came out to them and asked, “What charges are you bringing against this man?” 30 “If he were not a criminal,” they replied, “we would not have handed him over to you.” (John 18:29,30) Was Jesus a criminal? No right , they were lying to accuse him .

[@I.M2008]

Nice discussion but I did find it quite bizarre that Dr. Ehrman believes that the law of non-contradiction goes back only around 2,500 years to Aristotle. Surely, Aristotles teachers and their teachers (let alone the many civilisations before them) knew that complete contradictions were false. In fact, this law is so innate in humans that even babies seem to clearly recognise that getting what they want is not the same as being denied what they want. Imagine, an ancient people tens of thousands of years ago. Imagine two women among them both claiming to have given birth to a particular child in the town. Would it really be reasonable to imagine that the people at that time would be so illogical as to not notice such a clear cut contradiction? Perhaps, if I had lived at the time of Pharoah and claimed to be the Pharoah of Egypt too, he wouldn't yet be able to spot the contradiction. An interesting statement that I believe I heard from Sheikh Jafar Idris was that when someone says credibly claims something to be false, it must be because it goes against a truth that they know. If you are 30 years old and somebody ask you if you are 35, you would answer in the negative. Why? Because you automatically know that you being 35 contradicts the truth that you already know (that your age is 30). It is inconceivable that human beings at one point communicated with each other and had functioning societies without being able to recognise contradictions as false. In fact, I would include animals as possessors of this innate knowledge as even they are able to think rationally and process information.

[@mohamedab9033]

@Jon Doe It wouldn't make sense unless you watched the video the part where they brought up the necessity of the law of non-contradiction

[@sesender7788]

and also if you noticed, he strawmanned hijabs point so subtly, i didnt notice initially, hijab was talking about internal contradictions, then when he replied he mentioned that quantum theory and then said that he would believe it also if he was a christian. which is not the same as what hijab said, ehrman here is talking about LOGICAL contradictions, how can a particle be at two places in the same time. he didnt refute hijabs point which was INTERNAL contradictions. so example is if i say a flying tree which breathes fire exists in the south pole in a book i wrote and then in the final chapter i say this exact flying tree exists in the same south pole. there would be no internal contradiction here, you might say it is a logical contradiction because it is impossible a tree can fly and breathe fire, however irregardless of this, this is not an internal contradiction because my account of it was the same thru out. however if i say a cat called kite exists in nigeria than i go on to say it exists in nepal next time, altho this is logically acceptable, there is an internal contradiction within this statement. so ehrman equivocated the two fallaciously. And the Glorious Quran contains no contradictions at all, logical or internal or scientific or any kind.

[@saintburnsy2468]

Obviously non-contradiction didn't start with Aristotle. Do you think Ehrman is retarded? Aristotle was the first to _formalize_ the law of non-contradiction. What you're saying is the equivalent of someone whinging, "Newton didn't invent the law of gravity! Things have been falling for thousands of years!"

[@dyawr]

@Jon Doe Bhahahaha 😂😂 My thoughts exactly. This whole comment section is a comedy show, I swear..

[@hidehico6709]

@ExMslm. When you start the argument with "it seems..." Sure Mohammad is human being... Sure the companions of mohammad is human being... cause they can forget... So whats the problem?

[@changpahk6595]

it's so funny to see Mojab tries to persuade dr. Ehrman into some direction, then dr. Ehrman's too smart for Mojab that he englightens all too fixated stupidity of Mojab's 😂

[@FactsWithActs]

It's so funny how you can't quote one exact moment where Mohammed Hijab linguistically attempted to persuade Bart Ehrman of anything. The stupidity is in saying: Well we can't know if logic is true and the law of non contradiction is a pre-supposition And then claim: God doesn't exist because evil 😭😭😭 I mean where's the objectivity in that?!?!!

[@cooki6331]

@@FactsWithActs That’s actually a very good perception. His level of skepticism/scrutiny over one compared to the other is odd considering the lines between 2 contradictory things like “I exist” and “I do not exist” are much less blurred than “good and evil”, yet he was able to take a firm enough stance on the latter to lose belief in God. If he was still a christian I could see the motive to try to and argue against the law of non contradiction, but considering he left the faith his double standard here is strange.

[@FriendwithNoName7]

​@@FactsWithActs bart ehrman is too smart for this idio

[@pelomocho8567]

Thanks Mohamed for bringing Bart to crush the Quran in one sentence

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

Unbelievable selective listening. Did you not hear 12:20? That’s the biggest point we make

[@MaktabahAlIstiqamah]

"I don't believe in God." - Bart Ehrman "Oh my God!" - Bart Ehrman 20:23

[@MaktabahAlIstiqamah]

@@yahya2925 May Allaah bless you, grant you firmness upon the religion of Islam, and pardon you for your shortcomings. Ameen! Some would deduce that faith has not fully left his (Dr. Bart Ehrman) heart due to it being from the natural disposition of creatures (humans) or perhaps merely a customary action. Additionally, studies show that many atheist believe in the supernatural, despite many openly denying it. Also, some may deduce that you're not firmly grounded in the concept of Tawheed & Wala wa Baraa, & you have yet to fully taste the sweetness of faith as defined in various authentic ahadith.

[@ahmadmuzakkir6792]

@@yahya2925 then you should say Astaghfirullah and say your shahada again by yourself..just to remind yourself again..

[@Martha-zh3vp]

@@yahya2925 "Christos" in Greek means The Anointed one and is the translation of the Hebrew word mashiach (המשיח‎, messiah) which means the same.

[@yahya2925]

@@MaktabahAlIstiqamah Are you accusing me of not being a real Muslim because of a deeply ingrained cultural habit?

[@yahya2925]

@@Martha-zh3vp Muslims believe he was The Messiah (PBUH). We simply don't believe that the concept "Messiah/Christos" entails the meaning of being a human blood sacrifice. David was also called ha'Mashiach. He never had to sacrifice himself, so it clearly has a different connotation pointing towards being one anointed to rule by the law of God in the context of Israel

[@theguy8111]

keep in mind mulsims that Bart ehrman does not think that the bible has been corrupted. he thinks that NO teachings of christianity have been changed. he states this in his debate with Dan wallace. he is very misleading with what he says.

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@conjugatemethod]

Genuine question: why did he write the following book and what is it about: "The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament"?

[@theguy8111]

@@conjugatemethod well i wouldnt be able to tell you his intentions. but what i do know is that he would be getting good $$ from it. just like the book misquoting jesus. he doesnt even think jesus was misquoted. he stated in his "misquoting jesus" lecture on youtube that he didnt want to name it that but his publisher wouldnt let him make it something else. why why? because $$$. anyone can say anything when theyre not directly held accountable. like ehrman. as he does admit no teachings have been affected. yet he somehow states that jesus didnt think he was God. he doesnt mention this in none of his debate with proper christian theologans. wonder why...

[@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363]

@@conjugatemethod In heaven no unclean person is allowed in, you are unclean if you have sinned just once like lying, stealing, sexual immorality, taking the Lord’s Name in vain, evil thoughts etc Jesus (God manifest in the flesh) can put his sinless righteousness on you since He died on the cross, rose from the dead so REPENT AND BELIEVE IN HIM TODAY.

[@opheliasloveshack]

I’m a bit confused on how that’s possible, considering that Bart talks about how Christianity was diverse in an incredible number of ways… from Jesus being a man, partly divine and eventually made into God. Bart also acknowledges issues with the texts and addictions, scribal errors (some big, some small) so… how do you mean no teachings have been changed? That the Bible as we know it may not have been “corrupted” but the Quran only states that Jesus came with a certain teaching and Christian’s changed what Jesus brought.

[@Suredo-y5m]

Who is Bart ehrman?? Jesus doesn't need a man to be The God He Is.. He Is God from beginning till the end....He is God all by himself.

[@paddyman919]

Well this interview backfired nicely . Bart believes that Jesus was Crucified and he believes the Bible teaches that Jesus is God and that the authors believed Jesus was God. Good job Bart lol

[@shlomicohen2341]

Duuh, Mr. Hijab is fantastic at causing waves of apostasy. Didn't you see his interview with Yasir Qaudi? The Muslims will turn on Bart now he doesn't agree with them. Cognitive dissonance is real.

[@pelomocho8567]

Thank you Jesus for Mohamed Hijab

[@shlomicohen2341]

@@pelomocho8567 LOL! He keeps disproving Islam. Do me a favour, when you have time watch the debate between Bart Ehrman and Dr. James White.

[@fbbinoire201]

desperate christians who cant explain the basis of his core belief...and the worst thing is when you are negating your own bible when what sais the bible contradicts your church indoctrine

[@shlomicohen2341]

@@fbbinoire201 Do you have an example or are you just trying to deflect the fact Islam is a pile of S?

[@YHUNICH_MENTORS_A]

I got an email too....that is why I'm here 😄

[@mudassiraqdas110]

Me too.....🙂

[@A_bastomy]

Me too

[@shoaibaftab1259]

we tooooo...........,.

[@DadOfAiz2012]

That makes ALL of us!! May Allah SWT give us ALL TRUE GUIDANCE. :)

[@nakedbeekeeper9610]

Enjoy the smell of burnt Quoran lol Bart has totally torched it to ashes

[@sanjaymalwe3529]

Summary of what Bart believes 1. Jesus was historical 2. He was crucified and died 3. He believed Jesus claimed divinity 4. The gospels claimed divinity of Jesus

[@kbayli.jsk1256]

no

[@ashpoly8837]

Jesus is lord

[@jaz_shl]

How nice it is to mislead people, right? 😅

[@superhydra8873]

this is false, bart clearly says in the end that he believes Jesus (pbuh) was a man

[@zohaib445]

@@jaz_shl how nice is it to lead people to pagan worship

[@The_Crab_Whisperer]

Fantastic interview! Good stuff on both sides. I'd love to see more content of this flavour 😁

[@King_David794]

I look forward to Part 2 of this interview 😂😂

[@maradonafernandes2461]

😂😂😂😂🤣

[@cslewis1404]

He probably is editing it.

[@SecularKoranism]

Maybe then Hijab will pluck up the courage to ask how Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy.

[@FriendwithNoName7]

​@@SecularKoranism Are you stupid? Why would he ask a Atheist how Christianity is blasphemy? The Atheist doesnt believe in the concept of blasphemy since he doesnt believe in a God, dumb man.

[@dont-click-here-or-seeplaylist]

12:20 Dr. Bart Ehrman: “94% of the new testament manuscripts comes from 9th century onwards” 🙏🏾✝ worship the cross idol pray to it. amen. lol man worshippers bart believes in crucifiction because he was indoctrinated there are no eyewitnesses quran makes a revelatory claim of jesus being saved from being muurdered on the cross by cross worshippers not a historical claim although history agrees there was another guy named jesus. I HAVE BIBLE WITH CONTRADICTIONS THEREFORE IT MUST BE FROM THE ALL KNOWING GOD. RIGHT? JESUS SAID I DID NOT COME TO BE SERVED BUT TO SERVE WHY CALL ME GOOD? ONLY GOD IS GOOD XTIANS SAY THEREFORE HE IS GOD LOL JOHN CENNA17:3 THE ONE WHO SENT ME IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD JOHN CEENA 20:21 ABB SENT ME SO ABB IS ONLY TRUE GOD ACCORDING TO JESUS HIMSELF XTIANS: FATHER IS NOT THE ONLY TRUE GOD THE FATHER SUN AND GHOST IS THE ONLY 1 TRUE GOD AS THE SHEMA WAS UNDRSTOD BY JEWS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS MARK 12:29 JESUS QUOTES SHEMA TO A RABBI TO DECEIVE HIM INSTEAD OF TELLING THE RABBI I AM GOD WORSHIP ME THE LORD OUR GODS IS 1 GODS IN 3 PERSONS I AM ONE OF THEM JOHN 1:1 CONTRADICTS GENESIS 1:1 ONLY QUOTE THE AUTHOR OF JOHN NOT JESUS HIMSELF JESUS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN XTIANITY ONLY PAUL AND UNKNOWN GREEK AUTHORS AND CHURCH DADDIES AND COUNCIL OF NICEA. JESUS SAYS X XTIAN SAYS JESUS SAID X BUT MEANT XYZ BART EHRMAN SAID THOSE STATEMENTS OF JESUS SUPPOSEDLY CLAIMING TO BE GOD IS AMAZING HE DID NOT SAY IT IS TRUE AND HE BELIEVES IN IT HE LEFT XTIANITY STOP DELUDING YOURSELVES

[@yahya2925]

Bible says that God is not man ‘God is not a man’ (Numbers 23:19) ‘For I am God, and not man’ (Hosea 11:9) Jesus is called a man many times in the Bible ‘a man who has told you the truth’ (John 8:40) Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know.’ (Acts 2:22) ‘He will judge the world in righteousness through a man whom He has appointed’ (Acts 17:31) ‘the man Christ Jesus’ (Tim. 2:5) The Bible says that God is not a son of man ‘God is not a man nor a son of man’ (Numbers 23:19) The Bible often calls Jesus ‘a son of man’ or ‘the son of man.’ ‘so will the son of man be’ (Matthew 12:40) ‘For the son of man is going to come’ (Matthew 16:27) ‘until they see the son of man coming in His kingdom.’ (Matthew 28) ‘But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority’ (Mark 2:10) ‘because he is the son of man’ (John 5:27) In the Hebrew scriptures, the ‘son of man’ is also used many times speaking of people (Job 25:6; Psalm 80:17; 144:3; Ezekiel 2:1; 2:3; 2:6-8; 3:1-3). Since God would not contradict Himself by first saying He is not the son of a man, then becoming a human being who was called ‘the son of man’, he would not have done so. Remember God is not the author of confusion. Also, human beings, including Jesus, are called ‘son of man’ specifically to distinguish them from God, who is not a ‘son of man’ according to the Bible. The Bible says that Jesus denied he is God Jesus spoke to a man who had called him ‘good,’ asking him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.’ (Luke 18:19) And he said to him, ‘Why are you asking me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.’ (Matthew 19:17) Jesus did not teach people that he was God If Jesus had been telling people that he was God, he would have complimented the man. Instead, Jesus rebuked him, denying he was good, that is, Jesus denied he was God. The Bible says that God is greater than Jesus ‘My Father is greater than I’ (John 14:28) ‘My father is greater than all.’ (John 10:29) Jesus cannot be God if God is greater than him. The Christian belief that the Father and son are equal is in direct contrast to the clear words from Jesus. Jesus never instructed his disciples to worship him ‘When you pray, say Our Father which art in heaven.’ (Luke 11:2) ‘In that day, you shall ask me nothing. Whatsoever you ask of the Father in my name.’ (John 16:23) ‘The hour cometh and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the Father seeketh such to worship him.’ (John 4:23) If Jesus was God, he would have sought worship for himself Since he didn’t, instead he sought worship for God in the heavens, therefore, he was not God. The Bible says that Jesus could not Do Anything by Himself John 5:19 "The son can do nothing by himself; he can only do what he sees his Father doing." John 5:30 "I can of mine own self do nothing." Jesus did not consider himself equal with God, rather he denied doing anything by himself. 10. The Bible says that God performed miracles through Jesus & Jesus was limited in what he could do Matt. 9:8 "But when the crowds saw this, they were awestruck, and glorified God, who had given such authority to men." Acts 2:22 "a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst." Acts 10:38 "…he went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him." If Christ was God, the Bible would simply say that Jesus did the miracles himself without making reference to God. The fact that it was God supplying the power for the miracles shows that God is greater than Jesus. Also, Jesus was limited in performing miracles. One time when Jesus tried to heal a blind man, the man was not healed after the first attempt, and Jesus had to try a second time (Mark 8:22-26). Once a woman was healed of her incurable bleeding. The woman came up behind him and touched his cloak, and she was immediately healed. But Jesus had no idea who touched him: Mark 5:30 "At once Jesus realized that power had gone out from him. He turned around in the crowd and asked, ‘Who touched my clothes?’" Mark 6:5 "He could not do any miracles there, except lay his hands on a few sick people and heal them." Quite obviously, someone with such limitations can not be God. The power of miracles was not within Jesus. The Bible says that Jesus wanted God’s will to be done, not his own Luke 22:42: "not my will but Yours be done." John 5:30 "I do not seek my own will, but the will of Him who sent me." John 6:38 "For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me." Are some members of the coequal Trinity subservient, and less than equal, to other members? Even though they have different wills ("I do not seek my own will"), do they obey without question the others’ commands ("the will of Him who sent me")? Jesus admits to subordinating his own distinct will, yet according to the Trinitarian doctrine they should all have the same will. Should one of the triune partners have to forgo his own will in favor of the will of another member of the Trinity? Should not they all have the exact same will? The Bible says Jesus regarded God’s testimony as separate from his own Jesus regarded himself and God as two, not "one." John 8:17 and 18: "I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father." John 14:1 "Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me." If Jesus was God, He would not have regarded God’s testimony as separate from his own. The Bible says that Jesus had limited knowledge, but God’s knowledge is infinite Mark 13:32 “No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the son, but only the Father.” The Bible says that Jesus was tempted, but God cannot be tempted Heb. 4:15 “tempted in every way-just as we are” James 1:13 “for God cannot be tempted by evil” Since God can not be tempted, but Jesus was, therefore, Jesus was not God. The Bible says that Jesus’ teachings were from God, NOT Jesus himself John 7:16 “So Jesus answered them and said, "My teaching is not mine, but His who sent me.” Jesus could not have said this if he were God because the doctrine would have been his Bible says that God made Jesus “Lord” Acts 2:36 “God has made this Jesus... both Lord and Christ.” “Lord” is used in many ways in the Bible, and others beside God and Jesus are called “Lord.” For example: 1) property owners (Matt. 20:8) 2) heads of households (Mark 13:35) 3) slave owners (Matt. 10:24) 4) husbands (1 Pet. 3:6) 5) a son called his father Lord (Matt. 21:30) 6) the Roman Emperor was called Lord (Acts 25:26) 7) Roman authorities were called Lord (Matt. 27:63) “Lord” is not the same as “God.” “Lord” (the Greek word is kurios) is a masculine title of respect and nobility used many times in the Bible. If Jesus were God, then for the Bible to say he was “made” Lord would make no sense. The Bible says that God cannot be seen, but Jesus was John 1:18 “no man has seen God at any time.”

[@TheInzamamulHoque]

brother, will you teach me about all these religious knowledge that ALLAH has bestowed upon you? I want to teach my Christian friends about Islam.

[@rashidaquil5284]

They ll say God came in flesh and became humble ...

[@jasonwesley4314]

Stop deceiving and misquoting the bible you stone kisser... Your opening statenent is already out of context... How much more the rest.. You keep deceiving like the best deceiver allah the devil..

[@yahya2925]

@@jasonwesley4314 Keep seething in your denial.

[@yahya2925]

@@rashidaquil5284 They say he was 100% man/100% God. That's just a theological tactic used for mental gymnastics so they can feel secure in their cognitive dissonance. The Bible itself denies God's supposed "man nature", leaving Jesus (PBUH) shown before them as a mere human like them to whom it was revealed that their/his God is One, and they including himself are His servants. The Trinity is completely invented, and the Galatians themselves opposed the idea of Paul that Jesus was some "demi god". Paul himself wasn't even a Trinitarian btw, but he still associated Jesus with the attributes only belonging to God, not making Jesus equal with God in the complete sense that the trinity does however. The Trinity is simply not there. "No man has seen God at any time". So if God had 100% man nature too, he wouldn't even see himself?! Islam is the truth.

[@Dioliolio]

I have a strong feelings Mimi won’t be having Bart on ever again. 😂💀

[@estheroppong4782]

😆

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20

[@doubleddouble434]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz yea so?

[@cslewis1404]

😂

[@feduntu]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz 15:06

[@jezwright8052]

I choose the God of love and equality who does not contradict himself.

[@legend-mj4gv]

10:30 who else miss hijab's reaction 😂

[@isleohagger5455]

*Ehrman absoIuteIy destroyed here:* YT urI, _kOu2s31xt4 Was Jesus, the myth, reaI? *One reIigion beIieves somebody named lsa a.s. was real.* ls knowing aII about him in that religion an important element? *No. They beIieve there were at least a hundred great people throughout time like lsa a.s., whom God gradually guided with new wisdom and signs.* *CHRlSTlANlTY [Satanism] destroyed here:* YT urI, kVfgVnmKVAg Have a terrific week! what ever you choose to do with it.

[@legend-mj4gv]

@@isleohagger5455 biblical jesus is real and historical one

[@isleohagger5455]

@@legend-mj4gv No! But Quran says you're free to judge by that belief, (or any older revelation) if that's all you can understand. I have no incentive to guide you, I'm here to state the truth that Islam has all the answers, but people even most near to us, have always twisted them into lies. It will always be that way on Earth till the last day! Have a great day!

[@legend-mj4gv]

@@isleohagger5455 that's your belief..i respect that

[@isleohagger5455]

@@legend-mj4gv Your sect or body of Christians is teaching right, then! Thank you 🙏

[@giosafi6598]

Yeshua ha mashiach🔥 God’s living word in the flesh!

[@HawkLad]

His name is Isho in the Syriac Bible which is close to Jesus’ language of Aramaic. Yeshua makes no sense because it translates to Joshua. And his name wasn’t Joshua.

[@giosafi6598]

@@HawkLad you are actually correct. His name is Iēsous.

[@servantofjesuschrist839]

@@HawkLad his name is Yeshua/Yahshua which means YHWH is salvation and yes his name is like Joshua And yes Joshua led the Israelites to the promised land and Jesus will lead us to eternity. YHWH is a masterpiece.

[@giosafi6598]

@@servantofjesuschrist839 Yes, Yeshua does mean “to deliver” or in brighter terms “salvation”. Blessings brother.

[@sneezystudios5856]

@@HawkLad Both Yeshua and Yoshua come from the old Hebrew name Yehoshua. His name is Isho in eastern syriac and Yesho in western syriac. Isho still has different vowels to the islamic arabic isa

[@iamkafar6844]

Thank you Mimi 😂😂😍 Mimi wanted Bart to defend Islam but rather destroyed Islam in 45 minutes.

[@SecularKoranism]

Hijab was clearly too afraid of asking an ex-Christian how Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy. Perhaps one day he will get over his fear.

[@fidelcatsro6948]

not true... At the end of the day Bart agreed with Hijab that Jesus was not God!

[@HOPE-i6e]

@@SecularKoranism Not true. My denomination (one of the major Christian denomination) doesn't have statue or idol of Jesus Christ. We don't have idols.

[@SecularKoranism]

@@HOPE-i6e What's your denomination?

[@HOPE-i6e]

@@SecularKoranism Adventist. Probably the 4th largest Christian. denomination

[@shadowsenpai7151]

Wow, the Christians in the comments are living in denial. Did they watch 12:20 ? Anyway, the claim about scripture having contradictions or not is solid but it's not the only criteria that's what should've been explained. Because obviously god is perfect and he doesn't make mistakes. Therefore, for a book that claims to be from god needs to be empty of contradictions. However, this isn't the only criteria, it should be preserved as well for us to know what's from god and what's from humans (the biggest problem with the bible) and it should have evidence to back up the claim for it being from god. The prophet Muhammad brought many and different kinds of evidence to support his claim, such as : Prophecies that are still being fulfilled today without a single prophecy being wrong, the quran and the way it can't be imitated, the various historical and scientific information in the quran. For instance, talking about the previous prophets despite the fact the bible wasn't translated to Arabic until way after his death. So you have to assume that he was perfect at Greek, Hebrew and the best of all time at Arabic to cope with these facts. In addition to denying his sincirerty, in the sense that he rejected every worldy thing and got persecuted for this matter, and more importantly, deny his illiteracy. There's no god but Allah and prophet Muhammad is his servant and messenger.

[@hollyhill2045]

Wake up. Your religion is just as stupid as all religions are. You and all religious fanatics are ruining the world with this belief in crap.

[@MohamedSalah-qk8bq]

It's weird that I cannot see this video in your channel. I was only able to find it through a link on an email from Islam Net.

[@shoaib5453]

It's a private video

[@Shahid-if4ws]

Copyright?

[@marwanashraf1394]

If everyone came together and got their cards on a table and started looking for the truth, we might get somewhere. Because whatever the truth is, it always comes out at the end.

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@mohamedab9033]

@My Dear Brother Ben Those world's intellects whom you referring to are too busy with either secular studies, or having a war on islam without giving it a chance in Academia. You literally heard one of them in this video claiming to be no scholar of islam nor does he have the intention to be one, that doesn't necessarily render islam false. All it shows is that "silencing" the discussion is far more important to the West than having it out in the open. Lol and the most clear example of this literally happened a few days ago, how Jordan Peterson repeatedly cancels on having those discussions, but he wouldn't stop making ignorant claims about a subject he admittedly proclaimed to be ignorant about, it doesn't stop him from inviting people who literally make a living out of islamophobia. But when it comes to giving Islam its turn to raise its hand and speak in its defense? Can't have that in the West, we don't don't do that here. But that isn't demoralizing for muslims anyways. The more you try to hide it, the louder it gets.

[@mohamedab9033]

@My Dear Brother Ben And what do you mean world leading intellects 1,400 years? Islam gave you the intellect you so boast about. The Iraqis were teaching Algebra when your ancestors were painting their faces blue and running in the forest, burning witches. You know, Baghdad? Where they named 2/3 of the known celestial bodies centuries before Bush and Blair decided to raze it to kingdom come because of "reasons" ? It is muslims who invented Algebra, they named it "Al-jabr" from one of the Arabic names of God in the Qur'an "Al-Jabbar = The Compeller". the number "1, 2, 3..." These are Arabic numbers, bro. Alkhawarizmi muslim scholar and scientist invented Alkhawarizmiyat and named them after himself, when they were imported to the West they started calling them "Algorithms". Ibn Haithem is literally the *first scientist in human history* , bet they never taught you that did they? The first University in history was made by a Muslim Woman in Morroco. And btw, when women were given the right to vote in your culture merely a hundred years ago? Muslim women were allowed to vote in political systems since the early conception of Islamic Caliphate. Andalusia alone should be sufficient enough to prove that the West would be *NOTHING* without the the work/foundations laid by islamic civilization, before the coming of the utterly barbaric Spanish inquisition. Then all of Europe one day decided to have a Barbeque in the middle east, and burn all that they have built up. Don't speak of what you don't know, son.

[@Kevn37]

@@mohamedab9033 This is comedy gold. If we go by your claims, then it was the ancient humans who gave us fire, agriculture etc. So they must be credited for whatever humanity has achieved today. Lol Every part of the planet has given it's due contributions, so has arabia. To say that muslims gave us everything is stupidity. I guess you can't expect much from a guy who still believes in an ancient cult.

[@Kevn37]

@@mohamedab9033 That part about women in Islam. That was too good😂😂

[@AliD1812]

Bart Ehrman said on 29:20 it doesn't make sense to him for humans to say what God has to do because we're talking about someone beyond our imagination and rejects the criteria for revelation as assumptions on what is necessary. However he earlier said he became agnostic/atheist because of the problem of evil/suffering. So his criteria for the existence of God was the problem of suffering in the world, which is an assumption he has that God can't exist and allow suffering to happen. But I thought he said it does not make sense for humans to say what God has to do, which is exactly what he did to become an atheist. Suffering in the world has nothing to do with God's existence since God exists and can allow suffering to take place for reasons and wisdoms only known to him.

[@mni5245]

Islamic views of Jesus has no historical value. The quran was badly written and refuted by your paid guest.

[@richlk9901]

He said it’s incomprehensible to say what god’s capabilities are which is a fair statement what he said prior is that he don’t BELIEVE there is a loving god that would allow such suffering I don’t see a contradiction here

[@richlk9901]

@UCp-OdZX8dPzO6Az6EMTa7rw yes and I'd agree had he not said BELIEVE

[@Smitywerban]

How hijab why into this thinking "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" exposes the way he thinks to an astonishingly degree.

[@Ash_Queen16]

Yup!

[@ilj3168]

wow , this is Absolute GOLD 👍🏼 , can clearly see why Mohammed Hijab edited this 44 min video to just 10 mins on his channel , 🤣😂 ✝🙏🏼

[@ashrafulislam2904]

well i got this link from Hijab's channel where he clearly stated "Click Below For Full Episode". And that's how I end up here

[@TheAbrahamMichaels]

@Ashraful Islam what do you think about the long/full version? xD

[@clauaome25]

I didn't even notice

[@theastronomer5800]

Quantum physics would say that the Quran both has and does not have contradictions in it. Until you open it, then the wave function collapses and you'll see that it has contradictions.

[@nakkadu]

😆😆

[@izanazir7088]

The fact that you do not understand quantum physics and make statements for such is blasphemous. The wave function would collapse, yes and thats the observer effect. I wonder why it doesn't happen in applied physics tho?

[@munkush9287]

Jesus answered: "Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, `I am the Christ, ' and will deceive many. You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come.

[@joshuatheunkownuniverse.2475]

Also Paul said, Don't believe something when they preach you a different gospal which is different than our teachings even if the teacher is an angel. Check the teacher whether he is of the Holy Spirit or of spirit of devil.

[@muhammadaaus105]

Jesus gave glad tidings of a Prophet to come after him. He was also Prophesied in the Torah by Allāh (God). That is the reason why the Jews settled themselves in the desert of Arabia, in Al-Madīnah. Many of them were learned men, they accepted the Messengership of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) but they had enmity and hatred because he was not from the lineage of Israel (Jacob), but from Ishmael. Herclius the Roman king, who was a learned man in regards to the Torah and the Gospel; he was a Christian and a believer in the Cross. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) sent him a letter, inviting him to the true religion (Islām) of the Lord of Jesus. He believed that he was the Prophet, and he knew of the coming of a new Prophet. However, his kingdom was a trial for him and he gave into his desires. We have his words recorded, he testified that there was a Prophet to come after the Messiah. We have an account of another Persian man, whom was a learned Christian, learnt from his elders (learned men), a coming of a Prophet whom is to migrate to a city (Al-Madīnah) in Arab. The above shows a consensus amongst the learned Jews and Christians that a Prophet was to emerge in Arab. This is a historical fact, accurately recorded and can not be denied.

[@muhammadaaus105]

Now. Prophet Muhammad is not a man whom only claimed to be a Prophet and men followed him and that is all it. That is not the case, many (false prophets) have done this and men followed them, without having any evidence to prove that they were true prophets. Now, we have a Divine Revelation (Qur'ān), Revealed unto him by The Lord of Jesus. It has scientific miracles, linguistic miracles, fulfilled prophecies, zero contradictions and it is Mentioned in it by Allāh that He will Preserve it and thus it is. A man can not form such a Book. Furthermore, we have historically documented reports that everyone witnessed supernatural miracles which Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) did, by the Permission of Allāh. For example, the moon split. An army of men (around hundred or a thousand), having no water. Then water flowed from the hands of the Prophet (ﷺ), it did not end and people drank from it and performed ablution. There is much more. All of this is a sign and traits of a true Prophet. Not to mention his prophecies. He prophesied that in the end times, Arab Bedouins will construct tall buildings. We can see the tallest of the buildings are built by those very Arabs. He says and it comes true and I am not saying that he has made easy predictions, which anyone can do so. Now if one is sincere and does not possess arrogance in his heart, then this is the truth.

[@muhammadaaus105]

These are the true Words of The Lord of Jesus, in the Divine Revelation, Qur'ān: _And [beware the Day] when Allāh will Say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You Know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen'_ _"I said not to them except what You Commanded me, to worship Allāh, my Lord and your Lord and I was a witness over them as long as I was among them. But when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, a Witness."_ _"If You should Punish them; indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them, indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, The Wise._ _Allāh will Say, "This is the Day when the truthful will benefit from their truthfulness." For them are gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow, wherein they will abide forever, Allāh being pleased with them, and they with Him. That is the great attainment._ _(Qur'ān, Sūrah Al-Mā'idah: 116-120)_

[@TT-TTTTTTT]

@@muhammadaaus105 Muhamed was the bewitched false demon possessed satanist that broadened the reach of shatan by creating Islam and making claims. Nowhere in the Bible oh sorry he is known as the antichrist .

[@ganteng_ini_menyiksa]

It is pleased to see Ehrman believes and confirms that the death of Jesus is historically accurate.

[@cincylitigator4704]

This is a fair interview. I am a reform Jew. Thank you.

[@IAMNOTIAMNOTIAMNOT]

John 4:22 - Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. Matthew 28:18 - And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

[@agusiman2340]

Trinity Christians, they are people who run from the truth (run from the straight path) because they always deny the words of Jesus which are the commands and prohibitions of God (Allah swt). Therefore, every question that leads to the way of truth they do not want to answer honestly and cannot be answered as Jesus said to his followers. The trinity prefer to use their own opinion, the opinion of the church pastors & the opinion of Paul as the highest authority in Christianity. This is something wrong if it is not Jesus who is the highest authority in answering every question about divinity, good deeds & forgiveness of sins in Christianity.

[@Noneofyourbeeznis_]

Well said uncle

[@hashh2019]

Well they think it is not opinion of Paul- they believe God or Jesus inspired and taught Paul to teach what they believe now.

[@shareefcondon]

Trinity? Can't be explained. Can't be defended.

[@Ttcopp12rt]

I recommend you now watch the interview and hear how Bart refutes EVERYTHING you just said. The truth is that Jesus was crucified but since you reject this - you reject truth... Ehrman stated thr best evidence for the life if Jesus is the Gospels and writings of Paul - but since yoy reject this - you reject truth....Never seen such a more hypocritical person than you

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@percyhajee1420]

This was a friendly discussion not a debate. Why some people want to make it into some kind of who is right or wrong.

[@jude8507-b8j]

According to Bart Erhman, a historian and an atheist Bible scholar "Jesus was crucified, died and buried". 10:26

[@latishamalika1]

You Mohammad Planned Jordan discussion first...Allah planned Bert discussion FIRST.. ALLAH planned this BETTER AlhamduLIALLAH

[@noahwamalwa4385]

Prof Bart was incorrect to say synoptic gospels do not portray Jesus as divine... Matthew 16:13-20 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he ordered his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. Mark 14:60-64 Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.

[@evabelleh1192]

Girl what?!

[@noahwamalwa4385]

@@evabelleh1192 it is true Jesus is the LORD Philippians 2:6-11 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of servant being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death - even death on a cross! Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

[@evabelleh1192]

@@noahwamalwa4385 Read the Bible in context. HE didn’t consider equality with GOD because HE didn’t want anybody to know who HE was until HE was crucified and risen from the dead. You read anything in context but why not the Bible?

[@noahwamalwa4385]

@@evabelleh1192 here's is the context John 1:1-14 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life,(F) and that life was the light....The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

[@ranferchristian8050]

This is a GIFT from Hijab. Thank you Hijab by bringing Bart & Destroying Islamic faith!!!!

[@Md.Kamarussalihin]

In what sense did it destroyed it?

[@ranferchristian8050]

@@Md.Kamarussalihin Bart confirms crucifixion of Christ, Bart confirms that Jesus was considered as the son of God by himself & the others. Not only that he destroyed Surah 4:82. Listen carefully my friend.

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

Did you not hear 12:20? That’s the biggest point we make

[@Md.Kamarussalihin]

@@ranferchristian8050 Bart believe Jesus did died.. Bart also explain what son of God actually meant.. anymore?

[@feduntu]

@@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz copy and paste abdool, you refuted nothing since Bart started that comment with "I think" making it his subjective interpretation 🤔😂 cry abdool

[@MrBigo7510]

This interview backfired. 😂😂😂😂 look at hijabs face

[@MohamedMohamed-tr2rz]

12:20 is all you need to hear

[@SecularKoranism]

Whatever Hijab's expression, Christians still cannot explain how Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy.

[@MrBigo7510]

@@SecularKoranism easy we don’t worship a freaking cube or believe a stone take away our sins. We Believe God exist as God=father, word/knowledge= son and God spirit= Holy Spirit. We believe God word/knowledge was sent to earth in the form of Jesus Christ. Now you answer this for me. Why is Jesus called the word of Allah, what’s the difference between Allah and his word, can Allah exist without his word/knowledge, how did God create the universe. I need answers to all these questions.

[@SecularKoranism]

@@MrBigo7510 Muslims don't worship the Kabbah. I don't have to answer the dumb questions of an idolater and blasphemer who worships a dead Jew on a stick as the co-equal of Allah.

[@hullie7529]

@@SecularKoranism Lol. So much for the "we also respect Jesus" that Muslims like to spout. Now he has become (your words, not mine), a "dead Jew on a stick". Even if you only think he was a messenger of God that's still a blasphemy, my friend.

[@akitod297]

if a book has no mistakes it doesnt mean its from god if a book is from god it has to be free of contridictions simple

[@sparta2795]

Mohammed hijab thank you for confirming my doubts about why I left Islam 2 years ago . Jesus is my saviour and my lord .

[@thatbloke4335]

Jesus is Allah's slave, Allah is his Lord, christians empty flattery won't appease him

[@sparta2795]

@@thatbloke4335 6 years old and then 9 zip it

[@thatbloke4335]

@@sparta2795 you can't refute the message, the original point was that Jesus is Allah's slave

[@sparta2795]

@@thatbloke4335 where does it mention that in the bible in black and white . Where in Mohammed mentioned in the bible by name in black in white

[@thatbloke4335]

@@sparta2795 Jesus is called a slave in Mathew 12:18 and Phlipplians 2, but where is jesus named as Messiah in the OT, where is paul mentioned in the 4 gospels, you can't find it, however you can find the prophecy of Muhammad in songs of solomon 5, in the last verse, in hebrew, in the english they have covered it over so people like you will never catch the joke in a million years, the interesting things you are given a physical description before it,

[@haveyouconsidered7804]

What if we were to apply Bart's standard on Quran....

[@Kevn37]

K.O

[@zhamed9587]

@Not Right Now You mean the bright and prosperous part that brought you many things you take for granted today.

[@ahmedsalek976]

Then the Qur'an would be the most authentic documentation in history

[@anthonytan7134]

you will be simply called islamophobe and threatened with beheading under the islamic law !

[@zhamed9587]

@@anthonytan7134 FUD.

[@michaelchosen8755]

Mark 2:26 is not a mistake. It is a misunderstanding of Bart Erhman, he is not reading the verse correctly or in context. The verse says; "How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest,". "in the days" simply means when this person was alive. Jesus is saying; during Abiathar's the high priests life time David went into the house of God. Jesus actually got 2 things absolutely correct and that is; 1: Abiathar was alive during the time David ate the bread 2: Abiathar was also a high priest "in the days of Abiathar” (v. 26) which does not necessarily imply that Abiathar was high priest at the time David ate the bread. After David met Ahimelech and ate the bread, King Saul had Ahimelech killed (1 Sam. 22:17-19). Abiathar escaped and went to David (v. 20) and later took the place of the high priest. So even though Abiathar was made high priest after David ate the bread, it is still correct to speak in this manner. After all, Abiathar was alive when David did this, and soon following he became the high priest after his father’s death. Thus, it was during the time of Abiathar, but not during his tenure in office.

[@Yuyup7334]

I agree with you on this issue. The Gospel of Mark says 'in the days of Abiathar the high priest' while Ehrman says 'when Abiathar was the high priest'. Ehrman's is essentially different from Mark's. In this case, Mark was correct because it is true that David and his companions ate the sacred bread 'in the days of Abiathar the high priest' and not 'when Abiathar was the high priest'; hence Mark did not make a mistake here when he wrote the Gospel attributed to him.

[@clevelandstreetpreachers]

Today's Lesson for Muslims: Bart Ehrman said Jesus was DEFINITELY crucified so Islam got that wrong. Bart Ehrman said the Gospels are not contradictory. Please stop attacking us Christians with these claims now, and admit Islam got the crucifixion wrong.

[@shareefcondon]

Maashaallah, Prof Bart Rehman. The man who single handedly destroyed all the premiseses of the validity of the New Testament.

[@kennedyhill4938]

Just like Yasir quadir and Muhammed Hijab did to the Qur'an. Bart Ehrmaan did deconstruct Islam in this discussion. He stated that Jesus was crucified contrary to what the Qur'an states. Ehrmaan destroyed Islam preservation argument by stating that a book that has no contradiction or preserved it's from God. He said that the virgin birth is not true. He said that he doesn't believe in a God that doesn't intervene in human suffering, in fact he rubbished all of Muhammed hijabs argument. He gave example of quantum mechanics, demonstrating that two things can contradict and still be true (law of non contradiction). He destroyed totally in this discussion.

[@shareefcondon]

Bart is a massive Bible scholar, yet when comes to Islam he has BRAIN FREEZE like most intellectuals. 1st, when he realised the Bible has mistakes, he declares atheism, to end the discussion. He claims, because there's suffering in the world, God can't exist, yet he was happy for his God to gruesomely sacrifice his apparently only son for the sake of non-family members. Can't have it both ways. 2nd, he downgrades the bible, by declaring mistakes don't matter, because gospel authors were just spinning yarns with a moral message. So they are no different to any other pagan myths. 3rd, Bart foolishly denies that perfection is criteria for proof of divine revelation. His "Who are we to say what criteria...?" is an argument amongst men. Perfection is irrefutably a distinct attribute of God alone. I think he needs to man up and face it- the Quran is the truth he is seeks.

[@ahmadmuzakkir6792]

@@kennedyhill4938 Nahh,...yasir qadhi said his words were MISQUOTED...he later explained that quran will be preserved forever...even Allah mentioned in the quran that HE will protect the quran until doomsday

[@ahmadmuzakkir6792]

@@kennedyhill4938 Allah let the bible and torah corrupted so that HE will replace them both with the quran...and if you think you won making your "logical" points against us...Nahh...keep dreaming...darkness can never extinguish the Light...your jesus will let you rot in hell.. see yourself on judgement day

[@theaviationist.5719]

@@kennedyhill4938 Bart just did a tiny pushback on Islam or the whole concept of a loving caring god. And this has got a lot of Muslims on here in a defensive mode. Imagine if Bart took time to study Arabic and did his academic study on Islam and the Quran then he started to deconstructing it. The muslims would be shouting “ISLAMOPHOIBA”. An agenda against islam and muslims. These are Islamophobes and enemies of the Deen. 🤣🤣🤣

[@YourHeartIsTheKey]

Lol, with all due respect this is like loading up a slingshot and releasing it only for it to snap back into your own face. I really wasn't expecting Bart to defend Christianity here, even if he did it unintentionally.

[@DS-hy6ld]

The results were _entirely_ foreseeable. Unfortunately, Muslim apologists never seem to believe us, when they cite Bart Ehrman over and over, and we tell them that what Ehrman believes is _completely contrary_ to Islamic beliefs! It reminds me of the whole _"The Quran has ALWAYS remained the EXACT SAME, down to every dot and diacritical mark"_ trope which, only a couple years ago, was a mainstay of the Islamic apologetic -- _until_ the whole Qadhi "holes in the narrative" thing, and even the esteemed Shabir Ally distanced himself from that completely erroneous delusion. Yet _again,_ Christian apologists were trying for _decades_ to get them to recognize just how mistaken they were, but it took Bart Ehrman himself (in the former case) and fellow Muslims of some renown (in the latter) to disabuse them these errors. They could have saved a _lot_ of time, if they only opened their ears.

[@InshalHassan-r4s]

We are not hypocrites like you! We make it clear that we don't believe that Jesus was a son of god nor that anyone crucified him! But blind people can't see!

[@DS-hy6ld]

​@@InshalHassan-r4s Why are you saying that non-Muslims are "hypocrites"? The way you just threw that accusation out there makes no sense. _Why_ are we "hypocrites?" Also: A person can make up whatever historical facts they want -- even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary -- but that doesn't magically make them facts. If I said, "Nazi Germany won World War Two, and the Allies surrendered to them aboard the German battleship Bismark in 1946," the people who disagree with me and say that this isn't true _aren't_ "blind." They're _correct!!_ Moreover, that Muhammad simply stole a bunch of material from other religions is made blazingly clear by the fact that so much of it _makes no sense_ when it is imported into Islam _without so much of the explanatory context it had prior!!_ For example: _WHY_ was Jesus born of a virgin, in Islam? No one really knows. There's just no reason for it. _WHY_ is He capable of _creating life_ (from clay) -- and doing it *_in the same exact way_*_ as God/"Allah" is described to have created life (blowing into clay)?!?!_ No one really knows. There's just no reason for this, either. And _WHY_ does He, according to the Quran, _have knowledge of both the seen and unseen,_ being able to tell you what is in your house, etc.?!?!?! No one really knows. AGAIN -- there's just *_NO REASON FOR IT!!_* THEN (since you bring it up), you have the _other_ unanswered questions: _WHY_ did God/"Allah" prevent His crucifixion by having some other dude crucified in His place -- so that (again, according to the Quran itself) everyone would be deceived into thinking He was crucified, and subsequently Rise Again?? _WHY_ did "Allah" deceive us this way, and cause the creation of the world's _largest "false" religion????_ Did Allah not realize that his actions would result in the creation of the world's largest "false" religion???? Couldn't he just have snatched Jesus up the Jannah in plain view of the public, and of those trying to crucify Him??? Now.... I _could_ call you "blind," for your refusal to recognize the ENORMOUS problems here, right? Seems to me that, if _anyone's_ being "blind," it's *YOU* guys!!

[@InshalHassan-r4s]

@@DS-hy6ld I did not say that all non Muslims are hypocrites but rather I replied to the one who commented who tried to mock Mohammed Hijab! So your whole argument is baseless! And secondly you are even justifying him which brings me to the point where I ask that is this what Christianity teaches you?

[@InshalHassan-r4s]

@@DS-hy6ld And all these questions have answers but I think that these questions are asked to debunk Islam(which you can't) not to get answers or to find the truth Based on what you just said!

[@ryuzakilawliet8145]

Erman agreed and believe on historicity of biblical Jesus which means the islamic jesus is actually false and no historical accounts. It is really hard to accept muhammad testimony who came down after 700 years without any proves, eyewitnesses etc even judges in 21st century wouldn't accept his claims.

[@searchrightthings.947]

First big shocking news for deluded islam phobic christians is that already the bible both old and new parts are unreliable. is not 100% or 50% the word of God or prophets or even disciples of mosses and jesus rather than them or God. Second big shocking thing for deluded Christians islam phobic is. 4:49 they try to figure out what possibly happened !!! Lol Possibly not surely happened like islamic world have a chain of solid 100% reliable narration for the authentic hadith , Bruh Quran is another level of reliability 100M%. Plus i will add if i realise more facts after this interview.

[@capitalb5889]

To be precise, if Erman believes one thing, it means he does not believe something contradictory. It does not mean that the Biblical account of Jesus is in anyway accurate - he was quite clear on the inconsistencies in the gospels.

[@mni5245]

@@searchrightthings.947 according to your Erhman: yea I know, but I don't buy that! Hahahahaha