James White Talks about Witnessing to Jehovah's Witnesses

James White, filling in for Jeff Durbin, talks about witnessing to Jehovah's Witness in his early days of ministry. He also touches on the importance of the knowing the scriptures well. James white has had debates with muslims, mormons, Jehovah's witnesses, and more. You can get more at apologiastudios.com. Be sure to like, share, and comment on this video. #ApologiaStudios
You can partner with us by signing up for All Access. When you do you make everything we do possible and you also get our TV show, After Show, and Apologia Academy. In our Academy you can take a course on Christian apologetics and learn how to witness to Mormons.
Follow us on social media here:
Facebook: / apologiastudios
Twitter: apologiastudios?l...
Instagram: apologiastu...

[@Daniel-xc6oc]

I've been a Cult Exit Counselor for 35 years. My target group are the Jehovah's Witnesses. The issue with Jehovah's Witnesses isn't so much false doctrine. It's the authority they submit themselves to. One cannot separate Jehovah God from the Watchtower organization itself. They are one in the same seeing that the organization speaks on behalf of Jehovah God. As long as the Witnesses hold on to that worldview, attempting to show them the "error of thier ways," is pointless. Why? Simply because the only voice or truth that matters to Witnesses is what Jehovah says through the Watchtower. All other world views are viewed as lies from "Satan's organization." The documented fact is that the Watchtower does NOT claim to be inspired by God. Because it is not inspired by Jehovah God, this indicates that all Watchtower teaching is without authority, and is being made up by uninspired men - The Governing Body. (see the book, "To Every Locked Mind There Is A Key."

[@germandiaz5495]

Yeah my problem wasn’t there teaching my problem was how dismissive they are of relevant information that exist already… but I have never stopped reading there literature it’s always on point tbh but I like reading from multiple sources and seeing the overlap

[@celticRicky]

Romans 14:11 & Phil 2 :10 is a very good question to put to jehovah witnesses. Many more but I always begin with those two verses. If they believe in one God then are they two now or just one? It's the same with revelation 1:8 who was pierced for our transgressions? Then who is coming in the clouds? Then who says I'm alpha and omega? All through there own new world translation Bible. Always ask to look at there Bible. Blessings

[@adrianaskirvin9849]

Richard Carr awesome!! Thank you

[@andrewgraham6496]

@Kevin Johnson "...Yet we do not have a tetragramaton anywhere in the new testament...so all the Jehovah's are simply placed into the new testament to distort the person and work of Christ..." Have you any idea in the slightest, know why there is no Tetragrammaton in the NT, albeit in its contracted form as, "ia" (KJV) or "jah" (NASB) in Rev 19, have you?

[@andrewgraham6496]

Phil 2:9 and "other" in the NWT & KIT? (Aug 2009) The NWT & KIT translators [Jehovah's Witnesses] are often criticised for inserting the word "other" into the main body of the text in their NWT & KIT [referred to NWT herein for the sake of brevity]. Typical is the attack by opposers of the NWT: "Please also note the Watchtowerites have edited their “bible” and inserted the word “other” in the English text to change the meaning." [Taken from the BBC Christian message board]. Many opposers seem to suffer from biased theological tunnel vision, because, they forget, do not know or either, couldn't care less, that the NWT is *not* the only "English" translation of the NT to insert "other" into the main body of text at Phil 2:9! The same opposer wrote, "If we look at proper scholarly bibles we can see they stick with the inspired Greek scriptures." I take it, what this Trinitarian opposer means when he said, "proper scholarly bibles", he means bibles that agree with his Trinitarian theology! Yet, Are we to conclude, that translations like the “Weymouth New Testament in Modern Speech (1913) is unscholarly, also the TEV [formerly known as, 'The Good News Bible]. And what about the " New Living Translation", and other English translations that could be cited, are the Trinitarian translators and their translating committees incompetent and unscholarly? It would seem, that they are, if they do not measure up to the above opposers idea of a scholarly translation, especially if a particular English translation [be it by Trinitarian scholars or not] does not agree and measure up to and with what he thinks is or is not implied in the Greek text! What it also means, is that this amature lay Trinitarian, is telling professionally trained [Trinitarian] scholars, that they are biased and unscholarly and his opinion, his word is correct, bearing in mind, that behind many translations, there will generally be a body of scholars, who are experts in their respective fields and that it will be the collective agreement that decides the final English translation etc! What some Trinitarian opposers try to do is denigrate certain translations and their translators, thus giving people the false impression that they are no good, unscholarly and that is why opposers like the above endeavour to denigrate the NWT, but it can be seen that the NWT is not the only English translation to insert "other" into the text of Phil 2:9. It shows, that the various translators and their respective committees sense what is 'implicit' in the Greek text, necessitating the making of 'explicit' in English that which is 'implicit' in the Greek" and in fact all English translations add word not found in the Greek, that is because the two languages are completely different and if one had to translate back into Greek, many English words would have to be subtracted, not added to make the Greek comprehensible to a koine Greek reader...there is nothing untoward about this practice and in fact it is necessary with translating source to destination languages and vice versa! Opposers like the above readily omit important data and the unsuspecting reader is left with a false and misleading impression and may go away, thinking as the opposer thinks and therefore, we have a vicious circle of perpetuated ignorance, bias, lies and deceit...! Andrew Graham

[@andrewgraham6496]

Phil 2:5, 6 KJV “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God…” Comment: Since Jesus, who is supposedly God, according to Trinitarianism and was “in the form of God”, he could not have been that same God, of whom he was in the “form of”, one is not in the form of oneself, when one is oneself, otherwise, how can one be in the form of God, when one is that self-same God? At one time, the son of God was in the same form as the God with whom he was with (John 1:1, 2; 4:24), thus, they cannot both simultaneously be that one and the self-same God, only one can be God, the other is the “image” of the God with whom he is with, thus, the son is a second God, but, in what sense? A second God, the lesser God? Contrast Heb 1:9 with Heb 1:8, where in Heb 1:8 Trinitarians insist, Jesus is God, if that is true, then, Jesus, as God, stands in relation to and juxtaposition of the God who is his God, so that, God (v8) has a God, one who is God to God (v9); therefore, it is illogical for Jesus to be Almighty God, the one true God and simultaneously, have an Almighty God over and above him, who is his God, thus, for Jesus to be called God, it must be in a lesser sense (1 Cor 8:5), thus, the Trinitarian view is untenable, never mind illogical! To be in the form of something else, logic dictates that, being in the form of something else, that which is in the form of something else, cannot be that something else, thus Jesus cannot be in the form of the God he is with (john 1:1, 2) and at one and the same time be that God, because, he is with the God of whom he is in the form of!

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

@@adrianaskirvin9849 Not really. A JW would be able to refute the reasoning that is used in these texts. Example. Who is the Alpha and Omega? He implies that it is a title for Jesus. Rev 21:5 "And He who sits on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” And He *said, “Write, for these words are faithful and true.” 6 Then He said to me, “It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost. 7 He who overcomes will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be My son." "He who sits on the throne" is used repeatedly in the Revelation and in every single case, it speaks of the Father, not the Son. The one who "overcome" are to be "sons" of God. This can only be the Father as we know that those who overcome are "brothers of Christ", not sons of Christ.

[@TheologyProjectOnline]

Helpful stuff. Thanks for sharing. Considering doing some similar things on my channel.

[@jesuschristsaves9067]

Helpful? What part?

[@sneakpeakhometoursinsouthf6830]

For those of you asking, the rest of the video is at the link below, pick up a 12 minute mark. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH-5lmBol5KKi9U

[@wrexxasante1311]

1 Peter 3:15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear. FIRST THINGS FIRST!

[@nancyespinosa8172]

Dr james white is so good to listen to. Thank you

[@janetcavazos3133]

Never!

[@petersneddon962]

I was having coffee with a lovely older guy called Dennis. Made him think regarding righteousness and imputation

[@mikeandersen5]

@8:42 was he meaning to say "the best way to teach hermeneutics is consistant exegesis from the pulpit?" I was just curious if he meant to say something other than "exegesis".

[@Papasquatch73]

Did I miss where he worked through a few passages

[@rickdrop5971]

i missed it too. This was prob a woops too short video. Here is the full kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH-5lmBol5KKi9U

[@Yourname3000]

This teaching was helpful

[@Over-for-now]

THE most important issue is ALL glory to Jesus and HIS FINISHED work for salvation.

[@ceelocc1]

Thank you lord Jesus im in the middle of witnessing to a stubborn Jehova witness.

[@mikepennino0801]

same here haha

[@JesusChristSaves.]

@@mikepennino0801 same lol. Man they are so stuck in thier JW website like they can't learn anything else

[@adrianaskirvin9849]

Awesome!! I am ministering to one now !! Ugh , it’s hard !

[@cristaolegendario6417]

If you have some hard question from him that are troubling you, please, tell me. I'm an ex-JW with vast experience in refuting their heresies. God bless.

[@adrianaskirvin9849]

Cristão Legendário Omgoodness!! This is awesome! Congrats ! Yess please help me

[@cristaolegendario6417]

@@adrianaskirvin9849 Just tell me about what you are discussing with him, so I can grasp it.

[@cristaolegendario6417]

@@adrianaskirvin9849 Anyway, I can already give you 3 vital questions to ask him: 1) Since Jesus received *all* authority in heaven and earth in 33aC, what authority was left for Him receive in 1914? (JWs preach that Jesus only became King in 1914) 2) If Jehovah always had an organization, why Charles T. Russel had to found a new org, the "Watchtower bible and Tract Society", instead of simply joining himself to the organization that "Jehovah always had"? (JWs teach that God always had an organization, and that you need to join this organization to be saved) 3) In John 17:3 Jesus said that there's "only ONE True God", so that "a god" that appears in reference to Jesus in John 1:1 the "New World Translation" is a true or false "god"? (if Jesus is a true God, He must be worshiped, if He's not, so what a false god does beside the Father?) These questions are good for a start. They touch vital beliefs of the Witnesses.

[@adrianaskirvin9849]

Cristão Legendário this is absolutely amazing!!! Thank you ! Jesus is so good to me .its actually a 74 yr old woman that is the sweetest. She just only knows JW. She has had questions for me . I have answered them accurately. Had her scratching her hard at some point . However , her arguments are always the same . They are being trained at these “meetings “ just to disprove the truth , it’s crazy . She argues the trinity. And she also argues when God says , Jesus was the first born of all creation . Ahhhhhhh 😩😩

[@josueolvera4289]

I'm not a Jehovah's Witness but I have read the bible before and I have a question....Who did Jesus, as a Jew, worship? The reason I ask this is because from what I understand a Christian is suppose to follow Jesus' footsteps, in other words, they must imitate Christ. If Jesus worshiped Yahweh (Jehovah), shouldn't his followers do the same?

[@wylolister3218]

Glad you're not a JW. They are false teachers, false prophets and a terrible cult! JWs "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are still Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:2-0-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" in God's name? yes, these ARE false prophecies from the Jehovah Witness Organization. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope just a false religion!

[@wylolister3218]

From what I understand of the trinity concept Jesus was a human, and a Mighty God, Eternal Father (Isaiah 9:6 JW Bible) who emptied himself (Philippians 2:5-7) to become human in likeness. BTW, 'jehovah' is a false man made name for God even the JW literature says it's false but they are stuck with after naming themselves. They know it's false but will make excuses for it's use. JWs call "jehovah" a "misspelled & mispronounced" name for God, they even produced literature calling it a "blunder". "Yahweh . .. is admittedly superior to Jehovah. *'The wrong spelling Jehovah* occurs since about 1100' and then it offers its arguments in favor of Yahweh as the correct and original pronunciation." - Let Your Name Be Sanctified, Jehovah's Witnesses, p 16-20 (JW literature) (JW literature) AID TO BIBLE UNDERSTANDING 1971 Watchtower and Bible Tract Society p884-885 - literature elaborates as to its Catholic origin in 1270: By combining the vowel signs of 'Adho.nay and 'Elo.him' with the four consonants of the Tetragrammaton the pronunciations Yeho.wah' and Yehowih' were formed. The first of these provided the basis for the Latinized form "Jehova(h)." The first recorded use of this form dates from the thirteenth century C.E. Raymundus Martini, a Spanish monk of the Dominican Order, used it in his book Pugeo Fidei of the year 1270. *Hebrew scholars generally favor "Yahweh" as the most likely pronunciation.* "jehovah" = misspelled, mispronounced name for God! A false name. The only way to get rid of a false name for God is to quit using it. They published a "worldy" Bible that says the name Jehovah was a "blunder." See JWs own Byington Bible in Living English, published by WBTS (1971ish), page 7, on your WT Library CD (this is in the intro so is conveniently been left off the JW dot Org website). (thanks Lee) *"As to the Old Testament name of God, certainly the spelling and pronunciation "Jehovah" were originally a blunder."* God wants his name to be known as a "blunder'? Seriously? JW produced literature calls it wrong, misspelled, mispronounced and a blunder, seriously a "blunder"!!!

[@josueolvera4289]

@@wylolister3218 What name do YOU use when refering to God Almighty?

[@wylolister3218]

@@josueolvera4289 God, LORD, Lord God. Certainly not a name first recorded by a Catholic monk in 1270.

[@wylolister3218]

@@josueolvera4289 Did you delete your comment? It showed up on notifications but isn't here. Anyway, are you going to ask Jesus this? Good enough for Jesus, good enough for me. Mark 12:29,30 Jesus replied, “The most important commandment is this: ‘Listen, O Israel! The Lord our God is the one and only Lord 30) Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ Matthew 22:37 - New International Version Jesus replied: “’Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ Luke 10:27 ► New International Version He answered, “’Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’ and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’” Are you sure you're not a JW? You reason like them, poorly!

[@rogerwalters6443]

Proclaim it. It doesn't matter if you "Win the argument" God has given us very specific and clear scripture well as clear physical evidence, in all ways THE BEST ARGUMENT, which many know but they have not been won yet. It's not your argument, it is their hearts. As long as we are rightly dividing all scripture and clearly presenting it. You can open up anywhere in the Bible and find Jesus. Opening Isaiah anywhere will give anyone a clear picture of what God is doing and who His Son is.

[@wylolister3218]

Agree. Isaiah 9:6 New World Translation (JW bible) For a child has been born to us, A son has been given to us; And the rulership will rest on his shoulder. His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, *Mighty God, Eternal Father,* Prince of Peace. (the very next chapter speaking of God) Isaiah 10:21 Only a remnant will return,The remnant of Jacob, to the *Mighty God.* God in Mighty God used for Jesus in Isaiah 9:6 is the same as God for Mighty God in Isaiah 10:21 (Hebrew el) Luke 8:39 NWT (JW bible) “Go back home, and keep on relating what God did for you.” So he went away, proclaiming throughout the whole city what Jesus had done for him.

[@brandonjmorris5]

I think this video could use more Ads.

[@uniqoEnEsp]

Brandon Morris Lolll foreal it's only 12 minutes long what the heck?

[@elieldrake]

Here's the full episode for everyone interested - kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH-5lmBol5KKi9U it's just an excerpt

[@brucelyons7448]

Can anyone provide a scripture that says Jesus IS NOT God?

[@rogerwalters6443]

Ahhh scripture is hard. Good thing we have such a great God who uses us for ministering rather than the other way around.

[@amberall4840]

1 Corinthians 9:22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some.

[@wylolister3218]

Good scripture, I had forgot about it. How do you feel about JWs?

[@Peanut888..]

@@wylolister3218 Absolutely love them !

[@shevy_d9506]

Sigh, didnt know your name was actually James white,thought it was gonna be quotation from ellen g white husband... But nevertheless.. Dude.. Get to the point... I minister to JW bunch of times, lovely ppl most of them, but terribly misinformed. Best thing to do.. STUDY FOR YOURSELF always PRAY BEFORE OPENING THE WORD OF GOD. be blessed.

[@jesuschristsaves9067]

😂😂😂

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

Apologia Studios It is true that Jehovah's Witnesses do present a different Jesus. Different from James White's Jesus, Jeff Durbins Jesus, and different from the trinitarian Jesus. They present the Biblical Jesus as taught by the writers of the NT and by Jesus himself. When Mary recognized that the man at Jesus' tomb was was in fact the Lord himself Jesus said to her. "Jesus *said to her, “Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I ascend to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.’” Jesus and Mary have the same God and by extension the same God as the apostles and disciples, the Father. This is the God of the JWs. Is there is a God other than the God of Jesus and Mary?

[@lol24891941]

JWs do NOT teach the biblical Jesus. Jesus the image of God incarnate (Hebrews 1), He is the Living Word who existed before time, space, and creation (Genesis 1, John 1:1;14), He is One with the Father and the Holy Spirit (John 17; Acts 1-3). He alone is God who grants salvation (John 3-4; Ephesians 1-2; Romans 1-9). Read these in context. The Trinity is in the Old Testament and in the New. When you see “Angel of the Lord” it is Christ Jesus. “Spirit of the Lord” it is the Holy Spirit. The “LORD” it is the Father. All 3 are God, one Being, yet in 3 Multi-Persons creating the Triune Godhead. Read everything in context my friend, seek without anyone teaching you. Read the scriptures for itself outside of the JW texts. I encourage you to just “Let the Word of Christ dwell in you richly.” (Colossians 1). God bless you and I pray you seek the truth.

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

@@lol24891941 I agree that we should read scripture in context. The thing is that the scripture you quote to support your belief does not fit your conclusion in any context. Take Hebrews 1 for example. You say "Jesus is the image of God incarnate." Jesus is "appointed heir" by the Father. The Father created the world "through the Son" vs2 Jesus is God's image (representation) which in context means he is not God. Jesus sits at the "Majesty's (God, Father) right hand". Jesus "inherits" a name greater than the angels. If you simply read this passage with an honest heart it would be difficult to see Jesus as God incarnate. What you are doing is to read your doctrine into the text and by doing so you are missing what is actually being said. Neither Genesis 1 or John 1-14 teach that Jesus "existed before time, space, and creation". All we are told at the beginning of something Jesus was there. Genesis is speaking of the physical universe and particularly the earth. Even the angels existed before this time period. Where do you see the "oneness" of Father Son and Holy Spirit as one (being) in John 17 and Acts 1? Jesus speaks of being one with the Father but this is clearly in mind and purpose as can be seen by Jesus saying the disciples are to be one in the same way he and the Father are one. John 17:22 It is our duty as Christians to read out of scripture what God wants us to know. Thank you for your kind words and I return them to you in peace.

[@wylolister3218]

@@TheCaledonianBoy JWs are polythiest/pagans. They believe is 2 gods. John 1:1 "a god" At Isaiah 9:6, we read that the Messiah is called the “Mighty God” and "Eternal Father". Yet, YHWH God is called “Mighty God” at Isaiah 10:20-21. Are there two “Mighty Gods”? Isaiah 9:6 New World Translation (JW Bible) For a child has been born to us, A son has been given to us; And the rulership will rest on his shoulder. His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

@@wylolister3218 Whether Jehovah and Jesus are called "Mighty God" as the title surely applies to both. Just as the Hebrew and Greek words for God, Elohim, and theos, apply to Jehovah, Jesus, angels, judges, satan, and the belly, are they all the one God? However what distinguishes the one true God from any other who is titled God is "Almighty God". Only Jehovah the Father is Almighty God. Do you not believe Ps 8:5 where the angels are called gods (elohim)? If you do are you a polytheist?

[@TheJuan72]

John 1:1 can prove both positions depends on how you interpret it.

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

It is a disputed passage for sure. It is interesting the number of trinitarian scholars who do not agree with "and the Word was God"

[@wylolister3218]

At Isaiah 9:6, we read that the Messiah is called the “Mighty God” and "Eternal Father". Yet, YHWH God is called “Mighty God” at Isaiah 10:20-21. Are there two “Mighty Gods”? Isaiah 9:6 New World Translation (JW Bible) For a child has been born to us, A son has been given to us; And the rulership will rest on his shoulder. His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.

[@wylolister3218]

Agree! The Bible doesn't prove one way or the other. God doesn't seem to care either.

[@Peanut888..]

@@wylolister3218 No sour we have mighty God as the scripture reads BUT we also have Almighty God ….

[@Michael-it6gb]

It would be a wise idea to begin with explaining Jehovas Witness position. On Jesus. On Heaven. On Hell. On New Testament. Just diving right into his interaction with JW, confuses most people. Mr White tends to try simplify a lot of stuff, but ends up over-complicating way too much, and listeners miss the whole context because the basis wasn't understood from the beginning.

[@jesuschristsaves9067]

Likes to hear himself speak

[@michaelgardner424]

Psalms 83 verse 18. NUFF SAID

[@uv777gr]

Awesome as always! But that vest? lol

[@gialovesjesus8350]

He’s been hanging around Jeff too long is a good look though

[@CoranceLChandler]

Arizona heat has that effect.

[@Entrailss]

It’s COOGI. James has a few pieces by that company. Very beautiful colors. To each their own though.

[@Zanni619]

Coat of many colors lol

[@matthewwittwer8969]

(Swag)

[@chakkakon]

jehovah witnesses publish their own book.

[@oseanpower]

They publish Bible learning Aids . Stormy Daze

[@chakkakon]

No. It’s a bit more than that. It’s a cult. Anyone who makes someone shun their own family is a brain fucked cult member.

[@jaycos4905]

So does Christendom.

[@gerryquinn5578]

Another classic from James (I'm so clever, I know Greek) White. Here James talks about the importance of looking through the correct lense and book ends. James assumes he has got the correct lenses on. The best his lenses can do is show the alleged 'deity' of Jesus (not a Trinity) from John's prologue. But, of course, one can argue for a divine Son of God who is not the almighty God. So let us substitute and see where we go and what makes most sense, given that the word is a reference to Jesus. 1. In the beginning was the Jesus and the Jesus was with the God, and the Jesus was 'God'. Now, if God is triune, this means that Jesus was with the triune God and Jesus was the triune God. Oops. Jesus can't be the triune God. 2. In the beginning, was the Jesus/Son, the Jesus/the Son was with the Father and Jesus was the Father. Ooops. In the doctrine of the Trinity, the person of the Son is not the person of the Father. 3. In the beginning was the Jesus/ Son , the Jesus/Son was with God and Jesus/Son was divine. Now which makes more sense? Now look at v14 of John 1. Who was made flesh? Was it God or was it the word? And how is the word described ? The only begotten of the Father. (What does begotten mean or imply in every other useage in the Bible?) Now look at verse 18. We are reminded that no man has seen God at any time. ( but they all saw Jesus) He is described as the only begotten god(in oldest Greek texts) or only begotten Son. So we have a begotten god/son and an unbegotten God. Seriously, what makes most sense. James' Trinitarian lenses or the idea that the Son is the divine Son of God. And let's look at the bookend. What was the purpose of the gospel? Was it to show that Jesus was God or the YHWH of the OT ? No ! It was to show that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.(John 20 :31) The Jesus of the gospels prays to God and worships his God. The Jesus of the gospels is mortal. The Jesus of the gospels dies and is buried. He is raised by his God and exalted to heaven. The resurrected Jesus has a God(John 20 :17). The glorified Jesus in heaven has a God (Rev 3 :12) A God who himself has a God cannot be the ultimate God. Hundreds of times Jesus is differentiated from God in the NT. But the totality of scripture must be ignored. Instead, James and his kind hunt for a few so called 'proof texts' to support their anachronistic idea. But I'm still waiting for James to find the scripture that says God is one essence but three persons or the one that says God is three whos and one what. But what did Jesus and some of his Apostles know,. Maybe they didn't know Greek like James.

[@Valkaneer]

You can't even find a Bible anymore without verse division and that is a tragedy IMO. If God wanted verses added he would have added them in the old testament. Think how many less denominations there would be if we didn't have verses to tear from scripture. For 3,000 years there were no verses, and then we think, "Ya verses are the way to go from now on, we are so smart"...

[@jesuschristsaves9067]

Yeah you can. I have one.

[@willmartin34]

When any man presents to me Bible encyclopedias better than the ones Jehovah witness have published (. Insight. To the scriptures vol1 vol2 ) ill stop being a JW,,,but since they were published with the help of the wisdom of God,,,no man will bring to me a more accurate,wise outstanding, wonderful,set of Bible defenders that insight to scriptures are..Hans down the best iv ever found,,,they are like the supreme court of Bible defenders!!!!

[@wylolister3218]

You're in a terrible cult! False teachers, false prophets!

[@jacobfield4848]

If you believe in the Trinity then you are not a Christian, it's that simple.

[@matthewwittwer8969]

Biggie smalls vest

[@paragonofvirtue270]

What I would like know is how you still believe in a bible that claims the earth is 6000 years old ?

[@SpiritSwarm]

What I would like to know is how can you believe the earth is older just because some foolish people said so the is no real evidence to support old earth

[@Zanroff]

Where does the Bible claim the earth is 6000 years old? It seems as though you've not read it. I suggest you do.

[@MeMe-le5yt]

You should look up a video on KZbin called "What are aren't being told about astronomy Vol 1"

[@coachwork]

If a JW knows you are a real Bible scholar, perhaps they would be more apt to listen.

[@oseanpower]

This is Apostate studios*********** Candy Irish

[@watchman8693]

Why are so many people against Jehovah’s Witnesses? Most people are okay with Catholics, baptists, Lutherans, Pentecostals, non-denominational churches, etc. even though they all have somewhat different teachings. John 17:14 “I have given your word to them, but the world has hated them because they are no part of the world, just as I am no part of the world.” All these other religions accept each other, accept immorality, accept pagan based holidays..... but they all hate Jehovah’s Witnesses. Give that some thought.

[@wylolister3218]

JWs claim to be God's voice on earth, claim to be spirit directed by God, fed spiritual food to them by God and Jesus. Food FROM God? JWs "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:2-0-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" ARE false prophecies. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope just a false religion!

[@wylolister3218]

The Bible warns about Jehovah's Witnesses, it warns of false teachers, false prophets, those that add to or go beyond scripture. *JWs claim to follow the Bible and yet* no Bible I know of says anything about 1799,1844,1874,1879, 1914,1915, 1918, 1919, 1925, 1936, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's,1975, 2000,ect. JWs call their literature "food FROM God", repeat "food FROM God" yet it has these false dates.

[@wylolister3218]

"accept pagan based holidays" According to JWs God selected them in 1919 and cleansed them. Then chose his 144,000 (rulers with Christ) from 1919 till 1935. Here's how you can tell how FALSE JWs are. The 144,000 JWs believe will rule over everyone with Jesus in heaven are spirit anointed. The numbers for these 144,000 were filled up 1919 until finishing in 1935 according to JW literature (below). However these "spirit anointed ones" would most likely be disfellowshipped as apostates now in their own religion. They most likely at some point smoked, went to war, believed Charles "Taze" Russell was the "faithful slave", *celebrated Christmas,birthdays, Easter, believed in the Cross,* believed the Great Pyramid in Giza was a testimony to the Bible and its chronology, worshiped Jesus until 1945, claimed the KJ version was the perfect Bible, took blood, ect,ect,ect Pagans, pagans, pagans!!! Yes, those with the heavenly hope are the ones that are the most "worldly" and would be kicked out of their own religion if they were JWs today. *They would have to go before a judicial committee and sincerely repent before ruling with Jesus.* What a silly screwy cult!!! The ones going to heaven and be leaders over everyone else are the most sinful, disgusting in the eyes of average JWs! These 144,000 according to average Jehovah's Witnesses were "doing Satan's work". Good grief!!! "Hence, especially after 1966 it was believed that *the heavenly call ceased in 1935."* Watchtower 2007 May 1 p.30 "Their being identified in 1935 as the great crowd of other sheep was an indication that the choosing of the 144,000 was then about complete." Revelation, Its Grand Climax Now at Hand p.125 "We understand that this heavenly calling continued down through the centuries, though during the so-called Dark Ages, there may have been times when the number of anointed ones were very few. With the reestablishment of true Christianity near the end of the last century, more were called and chosen. But it seems that *in the mid-1930's, the full number of the 144,000 was basically completed.* Thus there began to appear a group of loyal Christians with the earthly hope. Jesus termed such "other sheep," who unite in worship with the anointed as one approved flock." Watchtower 1996 Aug 15 p.31

[@wylolister3218]

People and the Bible are against JWs. There own words and actions prove they are a false religion, false teachers, false prophets. Question. If you went into a Walmart or a McDonalds and there were 100 people. 10 JWs, 10 Catholics, 10 Baptists,ect. And they were ALL required to carry a sign that said imperfect sinner. Who would hold up signs? JWs sit on their own pedestal and judge others (just as you did), use harsh words when it's "worldly" people but use soft words when it's JWs. Plus, worst yet, you judge for God, play God. From JW literature: "But Jehovah's servants already belong to the *only* organization that will survive the end of this wicked system of things." Watchtower 2007 Dec 15 p.14 *"Only* Christian witnesses of Jehovah who successfully pass this test will survive and come forth like fire-refined gold for God's use in his precious new order." Watchtower 1985 Mar 1 p.14 "Similarly, Jehovah is using *only* one organization today to accomplish his will. To receive everlasting life in the earthly Paradise we must identify that organization and serve God as part of it." Watchtower 1983 Feb 15 p.12 " *Only* Jehovah's Witnesses, those of the anointed remnant and the "great crowd," as a united organization under the protection of the Supreme Organizer, have any Scriptural hope of surviving the impending end of this doomed system dominindividuals today depends on their faith and their loyal association with the earthly part of Jehovah's universal organization."* Watchtower 2006 May 15 p.22 "Are You Prepared for Survival?"

[@Peanut888..]

@@wylolister3218 your wicked and sour ! What’s wrong we’re you disfellowshipped . All this hatred you carry inside is eating you away ..

[@patchooo84]

Matthew 6 contains the " Christian Guide to Acceptable Worship" we are instructed who to pray to. How to pray Acceptably. We are told who rewards our true worship. Jesus God s Son directs our attention to one Person. The Father. Not once, not twice, not three times or even 4. Five? No keep going. Six, nope, seven uh uh. 8? Keep going up. 9? More. 10... Got to be 10. Close but no. 11? Ding Ding Ding! That's Right. But we are not done. Because three more times Jesus calls his Father God John 4:23,24

[@BasicBiblicalTruth]

And yet Jesus also told his disciples to pray to him (John 14:14). And his disciples worshiped him (Mat 28; Luke 24). And his disciples prayed him (individual believers [Acts 7:59-60; 9:10-17; 22:16, 19; 2 Cor 12:8] and groups of believers [Acts 1:24; 1 Cor 1:2; 16:22; Rev 22:20].) And his disciples confessed him as God (John 20:28; 2Pe 1:1). And his disciples identified him as Jehovah by citing OT Jehovah passages and applying them to Jesus: Mar 1:2-3 (citing Isa 40:3 & Mal 3:1), Rom 10:13 (citing Joel 2:32), Phi 2:10-11 (citing Isa 45:23), 2Thes 1:9 (citing Isa 2:10), Heb 1:10-12 (citing Psa 102:25-27), 1Pe 2:3 (Psa 34:8), 3:14-15 (Isa 8:12-13). John said in John 12 that when Isaiah saw Jehovah in Isaiah 6, he saw Jesus.

[@ifarotht5149]

Those who follow Christ and have faith in Christ is the body of Christ. Not denomination this and Organisation that ending with ppl following doctrine of men more than Jesus teachings.

[@wrexxasante1311]

Hi Dr. White, you had the chance to debate Gregg Stafford some years back but honestly, you couldn't prove him wrong. So why not leave them alone?

[@andrewgraham6496]

Actually, Greg Stafford white-washed Dr. James White, why, White could not even give Stafford a straight answer!

[@jaspermoliva1032]

dr white can only talk against Jehovah's witness if his talking alone, because he cant give straight forward mr stafford

[@wylolister3218]

@@andrewgraham6496 The Bible warns about Jehovah's Witnesses, it warns of false teachers, false prophets, those that add to or go beyond scripture. *JWs claim to follow the Bible and yet* no Bible I know of says anything about 1844, 1879, 1914,1915, 1918, 1919, 1925, 1936, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's,1975, 2000,ect. JWs call their literature "food FROM God", repeat "food FROM God" yet it has these false dates. *"Jehovah's Witnesses, ... have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* - Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are still Bible defined false prophecies.(Deut 18:20-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. Food from God? I guess you could say that even JW religion says they are false given their admission to false teachings that they have carried worldwide!

[@wylolister3218]

@@jaspermoliva1032 *ONLY JWs can study the Bible* and come to the conclusion that their top 8 elders (Kenneth Cook, Samuel F. Herd, Geoffrey Jackson, Mark Stephen Lett, Gerrit Lösch, Anthony Morris III, Mark Sanderson, David H. Splane) are the "faithful & wise slave" that Jesus mentioned in the 2,000+ year old Bible. That this "entity" from the Bible lives here today in modern day Warwick, New York at JWs headquarters and that they (average JWs) "need to obey" them. JWs believe this. LOL Yes, JWs are a cult! We *need to obey* the faithful and discreet slave to have Jehovah’s approval." Watchtower 2011 Jul 15 page24 Simplified English Edition "At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. *All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not."* - Watchtower 2013 Nov 15 p.20 The only thing missing now is the koolaid!

[@saralakatos1360]

Hahaha good one 💯

[@JJ-up5be]

Huh!!??

[@FakefulandDisgracedSlaveClass]

Where does Jesus say we must know koine greek in order to understand salvation? Or belief in the Trinity is an essential doctrine for salvation? Not a single Bible writer was a trinitarian, yet God use all of them to write the Bible. But James White and his fathers, that is the Church, have set themselves higher than God, so by there own standards men who wrote the Bible are not saved. To NOT be a Trinitarian is the most Christian thing you can do, since you are in the fine company of men like Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jacob, and even Jesus himself. Rather be identified with them than with Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Augustine and John Calvin.

[@spartacusantipas4580]

You display your lack of knowledge of the scriptures and understanding of true nature of GOD. You need to grasp OUR LORD's True Divine Being before you become involved in a Heresy where you will remain trapped. SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES [ John 5:39) for in them you will find JESUS " For in HIM dwelleth ALL the Fullness of the GODHEAD Bodily" Col 2:9

[@FakefulandDisgracedSlaveClass]

@@spartacusantipas4580 No, that is you. "They search the scriptures, but they search in vain" - Jesus was not a Trinitarian. No bible writer Believed in a triune being. None. Zip. By your own adhearing to the Trinity, you condemn all Bible writers. Stop believing in Church Fathers and belief what the scriptures actually say, without Trinitarian lenses on.

[@spartacusantipas4580]

@@FakefulandDisgracedSlaveClass Well, you're certainly not reading the same bible. Read Matt 28:18, JESUS said "All POWER is given unto me in HEAVEN and in Earth".....Oooops " Our Father which art in HEAVEN" ….Uh oh Houston we have a problem! And next verse....v19....JESUS is ALIVE after the Resurrection and on earth and says "Go...and Baptize in the name of ……(drum roll please)….THE FATHER, (1), THE SON (2), AND THE HOLY SPIRIT (3) and suddenly the Bell rings for the sound of the TRI-FACTOR !!!! May the LORD lead you to understand and find the truth of this awesome mystery of GOD revealed in scripture. Lastly, please be careful, ponder this question, IS THE HOLY SPIRIT GOD? When you can answer that correctly from the scriptures you will begin to understand the mystery. God bless your search.

[@bobbiemclidela836]

Alpha and Omega: To whom does this title properly belong? (1) At Revelation 1:8, its owner is said to be God, the Almighty. In verse 11 according to KJ, that title is applied to one whose description thereafter shows him to be Jesus Christ. But scholars recognize the reference to Alpha and Omega in verse 11 to be spurious, and so it does not appear in RS, NE, JB, NAB, Dy. (2) Many translations of Revelation into Hebrew recognize that the one described in verse 8 is Jehovah, and so they restore the personal name of God there. See NW, 1984 Reference edition. (3) Revelation 21:6, 7 indicates that Christians who are spiritual conquerors are to be ‘sons’ of the one known as the Alpha and the Omega. That is never said of the relationship of spirit-anointed Christians to Jesus Christ. Jesus spoke of them as his ‘brothers.’ (Heb. 2:11; Matt. 12:50; 25:40) But those ‘brothers’ of Jesus are referred to as “sons of God.” (Gal. 3:26; 4:6) (4) At Revelation 22:12, TEV inserts the name Jesus, so the reference to Alpha and Omega in verse 13 is made to appear to apply to him. But the name Jesus does not appear there in Greek, and other translations do not include it. (5) At Revelation 22:13, the Alpha and Omega is also said to be “the first and the last,” which expression is applied to Jesus at Revelation 1:17, 18. Similarly, the expression “apostle” is applied both to Jesus Christ and to certain ones of his followers. But that does not prove that they are the same person or are of equal rank, does it? (Heb. 3:1) So the evidence points to the conclusion that the title “Alpha and Omega” applies to Almighty God, the Father, not to the Son. This scholarly article is from: Trinity, Reasoning From the Scriptures rs, p. 405-p. 426.

[@DarrelSimon]

A Christian is simply a person who worships God through the son of God. A Protestant Christian Doctor Frank Turek (1961 - ) was asked by Christopher Eric Hitchens (1949 - 2011) "What kind of Christian he is, and who are, and who are not Christians, in his view, who claim to be?" And the good Doctor Frank Turek responded in this manner: "I'm a non-denominational Christian! I believe that anyone who believed that Jesus died and rose again for their sins is a Christian!" I believe that he said it best! The presumptuous accusation by the apostle Paul (Saul Benjamin) (3 - 67) that anyone who comes to preach "a different gospel" about "another Jesus" is of Satan the Devil and is to be accursed of Jehovah God is both erroneous, fallacious, and very wrongfully judgmental to say the least: 2 Corinthians 11: 1 - 33 (1 - 15, 1 - 4) Galatians 1: 1 - 24 (6 - 10) JST 2 Corinthians 11: 1 - 33 (1 - 15, 1 - 4) JST Galatians 1: 1 - 24 (6 - 10) The gospel is simply put "the good news" about the life and ministry of our Lord and Savior even Jesus Christ Judah (8 B.C. - 33 A.D.) in that the only begotten son of our Heavenly Father Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah) had died for our sins, and that he was buried, and that he was raised from the dead on the third (3rd) day according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15: 1 - 58). Each and Every Christian and therefore All Christians preach this "good news", and so, therefore, all folks (including everyone) who worships God through the son of God are indeed Christians (including both Latter Day Saint Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses), and for the apostle Paul or anyone (for that matter) to suggest that any Christian who preaches "another gospel" about "another Jesus" is therefore evil and Satanic simply does not pass "the Beelzebub test" in that Satan divided against himself cannot stand: Matthew 12: 1 - 50 (22 - 37) Mark 3: 1 - 35 (20 - 35) Luke 11: 1 - 54 (14 - 28) JST Matthew 12: 1 - 44 (18 - 32) JST Mark 3: 1 - 30 (15 - 30) JST Luke 11: 1 - 55 (15 - 29) The apostle Paul (Saul Benjamin) (3 - 67) of Tarsus arrogantly warned others about fearing those who preach another gospel: 2 Corinthians 11: 1 - 33 (1 - 15, 1 - 4) Galatians 1: 1 - 24 (6 - 10) 2 Corinthians 1: 4 - For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the Spirit you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough. Galatians 1: 8 - But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! Galatians 1: 9 - As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse! This unreasonable complaint quoted by the apostle above DOES NOT pass the Beelzebub test because both the Latter Day Saint Mormons and the Jehovah's Witnesses only praise Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah) and His son Jesus Christ Judah (8 B.C. - 33 A.D.), and if they praise God and His son then they CANNOT be at all Satanic! Matthew 12: 22 - 37 Mark 3: 20 - 35 Luke 11: 14 - 28 JST Matthew 12: 1 - 44 (18 - 32) JST Mark 3: 1 - 30 (14, 15 - 30) JST Luke 11: 1 - 55 (15 - 29) Roman Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh-Day Adventists, and Latter-Day Saint Mormons are just as Christian as ANY Christian out there.

[@wylolister3218]

*ONLY JWs can study the Bible* and come to the conclusion that their top 8 elders (Kenneth Cook, Samuel F. Herd, Geoffrey Jackson, Mark Stephen Lett, Gerrit Lösch, Anthony Morris III, Mark Sanderson, David H. Splane) are the "faithful & wise slave" that Jesus mentioned in the 2,000+ year old Bible. That this "entity" from the Bible lives here today in modern day Warwick, New York at JWs headquarters and that they (average JWs) "need to obey" them. JWs believe this. LOL Yes, JWs are a cult! We *need to obey* the faithful and discreet slave to have Jehovah’s approval." Watchtower 2011 Jul 15 page24 Simplified English Edition "At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. *All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not."* - Watchtower 2013 Nov 15 p.20 The only thing missing now is the koolaid!

[@wylolister3218]

JWs call "jehovah" a "misspelled & mispronounced" name for God, they even call it a "blunder". "Yahweh . .. is admittedly superior to Jehovah. *'The wrong spelling Jehovah* occurs since about 1100' and then it offers its arguments in favor of Yahweh as the correct and original pronunciation." - Let Your Name Be Sanctified, Jehovah's Witnesses, p 16-20 AID TO BIBLE UNDERSTANDING 1971 Watchtower and Bible Tract Society p884-885 - literature elaborates as to its Catholic origin in 1270: By combining the vowel signs of 'Adho.nay and 'Elo.him' with the four consonants of the Tetragrammaton the pronunciations Yeho.wah' and Yehowih' were formed. The first of these provided the basis for the Latinized form "Jehova(h)." The first recorded use of this form dates from the thirteenth century C.E. Raymundus Martini, a Spanish monk of the Dominican Order, used it in his book Pugeo Fidei of the year 1270. *Hebrew scholars generally favor "Yahweh" as the most likely pronunciation.* "jehovah" = misspelled, mispronounced name for God! A false name. The only way to get rid of a false name for God is to quit using it. They have admitted that the use of the name Jehovah was a "blunder." See JWs own Byington Bible in Living English, published by WBTS (1971ish), page 7, on your WT Library CD (this is in the intro so is conveniently been left off the JW dot Org website). (thanks Lee) *"As to the Old Testament name of God, certainly the spelling and pronunciation "Jehovah" were originally a blunder."* God wants his name to be known as a "blunder'. Seriously?

[@DarrelSimon]

@@wylolister3218 Our Heavenly Father has been reverentially called by many names. The Israelite-Jews, Roman Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox call Him by the name of Yahweh. The Protestants and Jehovah's Witnesses call Him by the name of Jehovah. The Latter-Day Saint Mormons call Him by the name of Elohim. The Islamic Muslims call Him by the title of Allah. Whatever name you choose to call our Heavenly Father by, even Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah), I am sure that you will do so with proper respect and with due reverence. The Christians, the Israelite Jews, and the Islamic Muslims all worship the exact same God! They may have some differing ideas about Him (in fact the Israelite Jews and the Islamic Muslims have very similar views about Him), but it's still Him! Allah is the Arabic word for God in Abrahamic religions. In the English language, the word generally refers to God in Islam. The word is thought to be derived by contraction from al-ilāh, which means "the god", and is related to El and Elah, the Hebrew and Aramaic words for God. Allah is Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah), it's the same God. Allah is just another title that our Heavenly Father has. The Islamic Muslim people call God by the title of Allah! Allah is indeed Jehovah, it's the same God! Allah is just another title or description of our Heavenly Father! Israelite Jews and the original churches call Him Yahweh, Protestants and Jehovah's Witnesses call Him Jehovah, Latter Day Saint Mormons call Him Elohim, and Islamic Muslims call Him Allah! Allah is Jehovah God, for it's the same God. There is only one God: Jehovah Allah! If you reject the truth that Jesus stated in John 17: 3, then you would believe the HERESY that Jesus is God. Our Lord did not tell a lie when he said as he prayed: "Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." (John 17: 1 - 26 (1 - 5, 3)) It is a pity that most Rabbis will not teach the Israelite-Jews the name of our GOD: YAHWEH due to either reverence or superstition which is a SHAME! No Israelite-Jewish prophet in Israel-Judah has EVER said that the Israelite-Jews were not to say Heavenly Father's name: YAHWEH at all. We all know for a fact that yours, mine, and the Islamic-Muslim God (Yahweh Jehovah Elohim Allah) told Moses (Levi) (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.) in 1513 B.C. when HE dictated the Mosaic Law of 1513 B.C. (the Torah - Pentateuch) not to say HIS name in vain, HE did not say not to say HIS name: YAHWEH Exodus 20: 7, Deuteronomy 5: 11, LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 15, RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 115. Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (7) Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (11) JST Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (7) JST Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (11) LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 1 - 35 (15) RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 1 - 124 (115) Our Lord and Savior even Jesus Christ Judah (8 B.C. - 33 A.D.) of Nazareth and our Heavenly Father Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah) are one in purpose, but not one in entity! Jehovah God is one God (Deuteronomy 6: 1 - 25 (1 - 9, 4)). There are no passages in the Holy Scriptures of the Bible that says Yahweh is three persons! Jehovah God stated directly to the prophet Moses Levi (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.) in 1513 B.C.: Deuteronomy 6: 4 - “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! Deuteronomy 6: 5 - You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength." Even His only begotten son agrees with his Heavenly Father on this point: Matthew 22: 1 - 46 (34 - 40, 37 - 40) Mark 12: 1 - 44 (28 - 34, 28 - 31) Luke 10: 1 - 42 (25 - 37, 25 - 28) Luke 18: 1 - 43 (18 - 30, 18 - 23) Luke 19: 1 - 48 (1 - 10) JST Matthew 22: 1 - 44 (33 - 49, 36 - 39) JST Mark 12: 1 - 50 (33 - 40, 33 - 36) JST Luke 10: 1 - 43 (26 - 38 (26 - 29) JST Luke 18: 1 - 43 (18 - 30, 18 - 23) JST Luke 19: 1 - 47 (1 - 10) Deuteronomy 6: 1 - 25 (1 - 9, 4 - 5 (5)) Leviticus 19: 1 - 37 (17 - 18, 18) JST Deuteronomy 6: 1 - 25 (1 - 9, 4 - 5 (5)) JST Leviticus 19: 1 - 37 (17 - 18, 18)

[@DarrelSimon]

@@wylolister3218 It is a pity that most Rabbis will not teach the Israelite-Jews the name of our GOD: YAHWEH due to either reverence or superstition which is a SHAME! No Israelite-Jewish prophet in Israel-Judah has EVER said that the Israelite-Jews were not to say Heavenly Father's name: YAHWEH at all. We all know for a fact that yours, mine, and the Islamic-Muslim God (Yahweh Jehovah Elohim Allah) told Moses (Levi) (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.) in 1513 B.C. when HE dictated the Mosaic Law (the Torah - Pentateuch) not to say HIS name in vain, HE did not say not to say HIS name: YAHWEH (Exodus 20: 7, Deuteronomy 5: 11, LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 15, RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 115). Our Heavenly Father has been reverentially called by many names. The Israelite-Jews, Roman Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox call Him by the name of Yahweh. The Protestants and Jehovah's Witnesses call Him by the name of Jehovah. The Latter-Day Saint Mormons call Him by the name of Elohim. The Islamic Muslims call Him by the title of Allah. Whatever name you choose to call our Heavenly Father by, even Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah), I am sure that you will do so with proper respect and with due reverence. The Christians, the Israelite Jews, and the Islamic Muslims all worship the exact same God! They may have some differing ideas about Him (in fact the Israelite Jews and the Islamic Muslims have very similar views about Him), but it's still Him! Allah is the Arabic word for God in Abrahamic religions. In the English language, the word generally refers to God in Islam. The word is thought to be derived by contraction from al-ilāh, which means "the god", and is related to El and Elah, the Hebrew and Aramaic words for God. Allah is Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah), it's the same God. Allah is just another title that our Heavenly Father has. The Islamic Muslim people call God by the title of Allah! Allah is indeed Jehovah, it's the same God! Allah is just another title or description of our Heavenly Father! Israelite Jews and the original churches call Him Yahweh, Protestants and Jehovah's Witnesses call Him Jehovah, Latter Day Saint Mormons call Him Elohim, and Islamic Muslims call Him Allah! Allah is Jehovah God, for it's the same God. There is only one God: Jehovah Allah! If you reject the truth that Jesus stated in John 17: 3, then you would believe the HERESY that Jesus is God. Our Lord did not tell a lie when he said as he prayed: "Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." (John 17: 1 - 26 (1 - 5, 3)) It is a pity that most Rabbis will not teach the Israelite-Jews the name of our GOD: YAHWEH due to either reverence or superstition which is a SHAME! No Israelite-Jewish prophet in Israel-Judah has EVER said that the Israelite-Jews were not to say Heavenly Father's name: YAHWEH at all. We all know for a fact that yours, mine, and the Islamic-Muslim God (Yahweh Jehovah Elohim Allah) told Moses (Levi) (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.) in 1513 B.C. when HE dictated the Mosaic Law of 1513 B.C. (the Torah - Pentateuch) not to say HIS name in vain, HE did not say not to say HIS name: YAHWEH (Exodus 20: 7, Deuteronomy 5: 11, LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 15, RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 115). Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (7) Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (11) JST Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (7) JST Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (11) LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 1 - 35 (15) RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 1 - 124 (115) Our Lord and Savior even Jesus Christ Judah (8 B.C. - 33 A.D.) of Nazareth and our Heavenly Father Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah) are one in purpose, but not one in entity! Jehovah God is one God (Deuteronomy 6: 1 - 25 (1 - 9, 4)). There are no passages in the Holy Scriptures of the Bible that says Yahweh is three persons! Jehovah God stated directly to the prophet Moses Levi (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.) in 1513 B.C.: Deuteronomy 6: 4 - “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! Deuteronomy 6: 5 - You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength." Even His only begotten son agrees with his Heavenly Father on this point: Matthew 22: 1 - 46 (15 - 46, 37) Mark 12: 1 - 44 (13 - 37, 29 - 30) Luke 10: 1 - 42 (25 - 37, 27) Luke 20: 1 - 47 (20 - 44) JST Matthew 22: 1 - 44 (15 - 44, 36) JST Mark 12: 1 - 50 (14 - 44, 34 - 35) JST Luke 10: 1 - 43 (26 - 38, 28) JST Luke 20: 1 - 47 (20 - 44) If you worship any other God other than our Heavenly Father Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim Allah)! Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (1 - 17, 1 - 7) Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (1 - 22, 6 - 11) JST Exodus 20: 1 - 26 (7) JST Deuteronomy 5: 1 - 33 (11) LDS BoM Mosiah 12: 1 - 37 (27 - 37, 33 - 36) LDS BoM Mosiah 13: 1 - 35 (1 - 24, 12 - 15) RLDS-CoC BoM Mosiah 7: 1 - 124 (95 - 124, 95 - 115)! Even our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ Judah (8 B.C. - 33 A.D.) followed the Mosaic Law of 1513 B.C. as presented by the Moses Levi (1593 B.C. - 1473 B.C.)!

[@truthsfromthebible2657]

James White seems to have a Pharisee type of attitude toward those who can or cannot understand the Scriptures. Am I reading a different teaching of our Lord? Matthew 11:25 “At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children Acts 4:31 “When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled, ordinary men, they were astonished, and they took note that these men had been with Jesus” NIV 1-corinthians 2:9-10 “However, as it is written: “What no eye has seen, what no ear has heard, and what no human mind has conceived” - the things God has prepared for those who love him 10 these are the things God has revealed to us by his Spirit. The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God” NIV

[@wylolister3218]

Food FROM God? JWs "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:2-0-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" ARE false prophecies. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope just a false religion!

[@spartacusantipas4580]

Brother James....you spent 10 minutes gabbing !! Get to it will you...… Thumbs down on this vid

[@3n197]

Don't mess with a black belt in jiu jitsu or James "black belt bible man" White,...

[@jesuschristsaves9067]

🤡

[@jimjuri6490]

Witness to JW? With what? The falsehoods they left behind? What's new?

[@wylolister3218]

Bible truth vs JW's error filled "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower (Yes, expectations with false dates!) "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added (any scriptures for this "admitting to mistakes" means they aren't false teachings, false prophecies?) Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are still Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:20-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond and added to scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" in God's name? yes, these ARE false prophecies from the Jehovah Witness Organization. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope, just a false religion!

[@jimjuri6490]

@@wylolister3218 : This ridicule proves JWs are Jesus' only Disciples who are awake in these last days. (2 Peter 3:3, 4) First of all know this, that in the last days ridiculers will come with their ridicule, proceeding according to their own desires 4 and saying: “Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep in death, all things are continuing exactly as they were from creation’s beginning.” How can people ridicule JWs if there is nothing to ridicule. It has to be about the end as the prophecy states. Exactly as someone is doing.

[@wylolister3218]

@@jimjuri6490 "This ridicule proves" that the Mormons, Catholics and everyone else are Jesus' only disciples. They all use this comment. Should the JWs be ridiculed for claiming God told them Armageddon would come in 1914, 1918, 1920, 1925,... 1975, 2000? Are these dates found in the Bible or literature from a New York cult?

[@justingutube]

Nonsense, but if you're lost I guess...

[@patchooo84]

John 4:23 Jesus: True Worshippers Worship the Father. End of the matter Your welcome Matthew 7:21-24 New International Version True and False Disciples 21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ The Wise and Foolish Builders 24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock Genesis 22:14 Jehovah Jireh Psalms 83:18 Exodus 3:15 Jehovah my name Forever Jesus did not Hide his God and Father's Name John 20:17 John 12:28 Jesus cries out Father, Glorify your Name ! John 17:6-9 NRSV - “I have made your name known to those whom you gave me from the world. They were yours, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word

[@ntfisher78]

Here is the full video kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH-5lmBol5KKi9U

[@xnihilo1044]

13 minutes and nothing on how to actually talk to JW's.

[@wylolister3218]

Go to their website: Ask them how this could be Food FROM God? JWs "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:2-0-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" ARE false prophecies. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope just a false religion!

[@jwjbros7926]

Lol

[@wylolister3218]

*ONLY JWs can study the Bible* and come to the conclusion that their top 8 elders (Kenneth Cook, Samuel F. Herd, Geoffrey Jackson, Mark Stephen Lett, Gerrit Lösch, Anthony Morris III, Mark Sanderson, David H. Splane) are the "faithful & wise slave" that Jesus mentioned in the 2,000+ year old Bible. That this "entity" from the Bible lives here today in modern day Warwick, New York at JWs headquarters and that they (average JWs) "need to obey" them. JWs believe this. LOL Yes, JWs are a cult! We *need to obey* the faithful and discreet slave to have Jehovah’s approval." Watchtower 2011 Jul 15 page24 Simplified English Edition "At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. *All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not."* - Watchtower 2013 Nov 15 p.20 The only thing missing now is the koolaid!

[@eliasarches2575]

I am one of the few Jehovah’s Witnesses that has done a deeper dive in the Greek than most. John 1:1 translation of “a god” vs “God” is essentially going to be a theologically slanted interpretation, since there is no indefinite article in the original Greek and in this verse there is no definite article. So any translation is ultimately a theological choice, although I would argue that the “God” translation is nonsensical. James White’s argument seems to be if you aren’t an expert in Greek you have to right to comment. But it is possible to research individual translation issues, look at the Greek, look at different translations & scholars, etc. I can tell you, having listened to this video, his approach isn’t a good one.

[@Tonybronx74]

Pastor Steven Anderson is right about this guy.

[@wrexxasante1311]

I am a member of the Presbyterian Church of Ghana and I don't see the need in spending time to learn how to preach to a Jehovah's witness, when most Christians don't even know what they're doing. Just leave the Witnesses alone, you're giving them too much attention

[@andrewgraham6496]

John 20:17; 2 Cor 1:3; Eph 1:3, 17; Heb 1:9; 1 Pet 1:3; Rev 3:12, 14? Hmmm?

[@wylolister3218]

Ephesians 5:11 ESV Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, *but instead expose them.* 1 John 4:1 - Beloved ones, do not believe every inspired expression, but test the inspired expressions to see whether they originate with God, because many false prophets have gone forth into the world.

[@justinekangwa2635]

The problem with Dr white presentation is that his defending the trinity in anyway best to preserve the trinitarian doctrine. However the JW organisation is true in many ways too as to y Jesus Christ cannot be God Almighty (Jehovah) or Yahweh. Some scripture support trinitarian but many disapprove it .. Judaism also disapproves it too.. So we a consensus here..

[@ulisesbernales5969]

Jesus said that the truth was revealed to babes and hidden from the wise and learned. This man is so full of pride in his education that he looks down on a and i quote " house wife"!

[@rollmops3113]

That's not what he meant! Totally out of context

[@andrewgraham6496]

I was a Trinitarian for more than 20 years and by deliberate choice, now a JW (I went from religion to religion and what I found among lay Trinitarians was gross ignorance and spoonfeeding...) that gives me a perspective, that some may not have, as I can see the issue from both sides; be that as it may, I have been looking through many of the replies by Trinitarians who side with White and the ignorance and spoonfeeding is all to obvious, as lay Trinitarians are literally being spoonfed by White, who has been taken to task by apologist JWs over time! What Trinitarian apologists like White, Bowman, Rhodes...do, is to omit pertinent information from their readers and feed them half truths and then when their readers have swallowed such, hook line and sinker, they further feed them with (now that they know that they have them) outright brainwashing blatant lies; I know, as i have been there!

[@wylolister3218]

JWs "truth"? "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, *have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are Bible defined false prophecies (Deut 18:2-0-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. "suggested dates, wrong expectations" ARE false prophecies. God's channel of communications, his voice on earth, God's mouthpiece, JWs? Nope just a false religion!

[@wylolister3218]

Is JW literature God's voice? Is it spiritual food from God even though as JW admit they have been incorrect, wrong, made mistakes and these are printed in black & white in their literature? *"A religion that teaches lies cannot be true."* Watchtower 1991 Dec 1 p.7 I must agree!!!

[@wylolister3218]

"It is vital that we appreciate this fact and respond to the directions of the "slave" *as we would to the voice of God, because it is His provision."* Watchtower 1957 Jun 15 p.370 Here's just a very short list of JEHOVAH'S Witnesses "spoken in his name" and "what did not come true'. (Deut 18:20-22) God's Word the Bible's definition for a false prophet! 1940 - “The year 1940 is certain to be the most important year yet because Armageddon is very near.” - Informant, April 1940, p1 1941 - “Armageddon is surely near…” - Children, 1941, p.366 1941 -- "Receiving the gift, the marching children clasped it to them, not a toy or plaything for idle pleasure, but the Lord's provided instrument for most effective work in the remaining months before Armageddon," - Watchtower, Sept. 15, 1941, p.288 JWs *truth & "accurate knowledge"* 78+ years ago. *940 months!* 1942 - “Now, with Armageddon immediately before us…” - Watchtower, April 1, 1942, p.139 1946 - “The disaster of Armageddon… is at the door.” - Let God be True, 1946, p.194 1955 - “In the light of the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, it is becoming clear that the war of Armageddon is nearing its breaking-out point.” - You May Survive in God’s New World, 1955, p.331 1966 - “Armageddon is, in fact, very close indeed.” - Watchtower, October 15, 1966, p.629 (Luke 21:8) NIV He replied:"Watch out that you are not deceived. For many will come in my name, claiming, 'I am he,' and, 'The time is near.' Do not follow them."

[@eliasarches2575]

Very encouraging comment! Unfortunately these trinitarian apologists have been answered so many times already in what has been published by the brothers, but they are more interested in preaching to the choir.

[@Peanut888..]

@@wylolister3218 eewwww your in nearly every single comment replying full of hatred .You don’t have Jesus in your heart , satan resides there !

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

Dr. White tells us that "the first 18 verses of the gospel of John acts as a lens through which you read the rest of the gospel" His conclusion is that from these opening 18 verses is that Jesus is God, a person in the 3 person God. If that is the case why would John give us a different conclusion than Dr. Whites? John 20:30 "Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. 31 But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name."NIV Dr. White > Johns gospel was written to show that Jesus is God the Son John> I wrote the gospel to show that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God This was a very poor presentation, as well as being completely wrong as to who Jesus is according to John.

[@wylolister3218]

The Bible warns about Jehovah's Witnesses, it warns of false teachers, false prophets, those that add to or go beyond scripture. *JWs claim to follow the Bible and yet* no Bible I know of says anything about 1844, 1879, 1914,1915, 1918, 1919, 1925, 1936, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's,1975, 2000,ect. JWs call their literature "food FROM God", repeat "food FROM God" yet it has these false dates. *"Jehovah's Witnesses, ... have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect."* Awake 1993 Mar 22 page4 *Jehovah’s Witnesses have had wrong expectations about when the end would come.* - Jan 1, 2013 Watchtower "Does this admission of making mistakes stamp them [Jehovah's Witnesses] as false prophets? Not at all, for false prophets do not admit to making mistakes." Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1972, page 644 - in brackets added Admitting to making false prophecies doesn't magically change them, they are still Bible defined false prophecies.(Deut 18:20-22) Very poor reasoning, probably why JWs "suggested dates" and went beyond scripture. Food from God? I guess you could say that even JW religion says they are false given their admission to false teachings that they have carried worldwide! Those are man's dates or they come from Satan!

[@TheCaledonianBoy]

@@wylolister3218 Your nonsense comment has nothing to do with the subject being discussed. If you believe JWs are false teachers get the Bible out and make your challenge with scripture

[@als.8690]

@@wylolister3218 Amen sir. JWs interpretation of Bible prophecy has been flawed and full of nonsense for 150 years. They lie and misrepresent their own history. Original source WT publications pre1950 for the WT magazine and even much later for other books, are not available to JWs for fact checking the GB claims regarding their history. I challenge any JW to read the infamous The Finished Mystery, or Millions Now Living will Never Die books, and remain a JW. Oh...sorry..those books aren't available on jworg. Oh and btw, JWs are instructed to dispose of any of their own personal libraries of older WT material. Yet those books and countless others now hidden from JWs today, were claimed to be Bible based truths and information? Its wild stuff. Its that nutty crazy embarassing stuff upon which Jesus chose? them?..not my Jesus!! They use a blatantly doctored NWT. Why would any clear headed searcher of Bible truth ever trust anything that this cult puts out there. Its a cult that denegrates Jesus.

[@fernandohernandez4567]

I love how james white Talks to us as if we are all ignorant millenials 😂😂

[@saralakatos1360]

Hahaha 😂

[@stevenwebb6253]

Sorry, Jesus isn’t God. He called our God and Father his God and Father at John 20:17.

[@wylolister3218]

Isaiah 9:6 New World Translation (JW bible) For a child has been born to us, A son has been given to us; And the rulership will rest on his shoulder. His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, *Mighty God, Eternal Father,* Prince of Peace. How many Mighty Gods, Eternal Fathers do you believe in? What does Immanuel mean?

[@stevenwebb6253]

@@wylolister3218 A mighty god. Not almighty God. The Bible clears this up for us at 1 Corinthians 8:4-6 4 Now concerning the eating of food offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world and that there is no God but one. 5 For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,” 6 there is actually to us one God, the Father, from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him. NWT 4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. 5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) 6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. King James

[@wapperjaw8282]

12 min of babbling ... if you want to learn how to use an Apple Computer do you use a Windows Computer. If wan to know what JW's beleive go to a JW ...

[@rollmops3113]

Why?

[@jamez456]

Because I’m sat here with my Bible, waiting for him to recite some sort of scripture, all I hear is babble too. I’m in this conversation because I want to know Christ, not this guy or the other guy or anyone else’s opinions

[@wapperjaw8282]

@@jamez456 If you have a question concerning a scripture feel free to ask.

[@Peter-wp5vb]

@@wapperjaw8282 what are your thoughts on the trinity?

[@wapperjaw8282]

​@@Peter-wp5vb The Trinity is not explained at all in the scriptures. As the scriptures says at John 17:3, “This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, *the only true God, and the one whom you sent,* Jesus Christ.” Since it means life to know the only true God, *then you think there would be details of the teaching in the scriptures, but there’s not one sentence, not one paragraph explaining it throughout the entire Bible.* Rather what the teaching does is twist the meaning of words, and twist context, and it clearly *avoids* scriptures that clearly show the doctrine is false! As John 17:3 clearly states it was the one true God that sent Jesus Christ. By Jesus' own testimony he say’s, “Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.” - John 13:6 He also clearly said “. . .Father, for the Father is greater . . .” - Joh 14:28. “. . .Now concerning the eating of food offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world and that there is *no God but one.* For even though there are *so-called gods,* whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,” *there is actually to us one God, the Father,* from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him.” - 1Co 8:4-6 The scriptures are very clear that the one God is the Father only, not one scripture states the Son or the Christ is God. Not one scripture says Jesus is equal to God as claimed by the Trinity teaching. Yet the scriptures clearly show Jesus is a servant of God (Ac 3:13), is still subject to God (1CO 15:27,28), and worships his God (John 20:17). The claim that Jesus is equal to his Father is simply ridiculous and is scripturally uninspired. If an interpretation contradicts any scriptures according to 2 Tim 3:16, 17, it is clearly wrong. What a paradox the Trinity Teaches ... they don't even believe what Jesus says's whom they worship, which is idolatry ...

[@user-nn4bc9pv5f]

James White is a Calvinist….so why waste your time witnessing to people that are in cults Mr. White if they are not chosen to be saved. Calvinism is an arrogant, narcissistic, doctrine which falsely accuses Jesus Christ of not dying and resurrecting for the all of mankind. (John 3:16) (Acts 17:30) 2 Peter 3:9) May the Lord deliver you Mr. White from Calvinism.

[@Fingertipsable]

Sorry but this Gentleman scares me. His eyes! No Love there.

[@Peanut888..]

Exactly he should be preaching the gospel NOT putting other religious groups down !

[@BenjaminNesan]

Oh wow. Look at someone’s eyes and say he’s got a mote in his eyes. Didn’t v somebody speak on this before.

[@Partyrockk]

James White? Isn't this guy a Calvinist? I mean Witnesses have their issues, but Calvinism is much worse imo.

[@dinomorell5163]

Jehovah God would never EVER say He has a God that He worships,bows to,answers to etc.Yet Christ did say he does have a God which is in reference to His Father-Jehovah who is above Christ.Christ is also mentioned as having been created,this is brought out in Proverbs.8:22-31.

[@DoubledPawns]

Please watch this video - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGOpkoCKjrhjmq8

[@ntfisher78]

Christ is fully God and fully man which means as a man on earth he has a God, which is God the Father. Philippians 2 teaches this in detail. 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:5-11, NASB)

[@JonneytheKidd]

You got it all wrong: Check out this Mic Drop - Was Jesus a created being? kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3SmmZuCfNOVfqs Interpreting John 1:1 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/h2bbY359e5yLmLc Who Is Jesus According to Jehovah's Witnesses? kzbin.info/www/bejne/boTYlnV3qJybZ8k Are Jehovah's Witnesses a Cult? kzbin.info/www/bejne/iKLYcpqgoLOakM0

[@stevehumphries4928]

@@ntfisher78 *LOL You used the scripture trying to teach Jesus is God but the scripture says Jesus is not equal to God!* Php 2: 6 says and I quote from you ... *"did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped,"* Do you read English this says... Jesus is Not equal to God. So Jesus is not a God-Man. Php 2: 6 "Who, although He existed in the form of God ... *"did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped,"* *Plus the fact verses 1-6 that Paul is teaching the congregation to have the same mind as Christ to be humble, consider other superiors and uses who ... Jesus, as the example! Were they to consider themselves superior and equal to God? *NO!* You teach the opposite of what Paul teaching!*

[@stevehumphries4928]

@@JonneytheKidd www.jw.org/en/search/?q=Cult ........ JW"S are not a Cult. *Christendom is the cult ... they have practiced false worship to images and creatures which is idolatry! They have become part of the world and due to that have become bloodguilty in killing one another! They have imprisoned, tortured, and executed lovers of God word.* kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6Xbnn-aeLiggrs