Jehovah's Witnesses & Science #1

  Рет қаралды 1,230

Sabianfan

Sabianfan

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 16
@Lekozza
@Lekozza 11 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the share.
@hapymark123
@hapymark123 8 жыл бұрын
thank you for this video
@earthenly
@earthenly 11 жыл бұрын
Hi Richard. At 4: 50, it says, Think of the way we were made. We possess sensory perception ..... Concerning sensory perception, is he speaking of extra sensory perception included ? It makes sense to me that the extra sense would belong, belong in the sense that this sense functions as a sensor of danger (whatever its intended purpose). I'm not talking crystal balls, palm reading, black magic, etc.. I hope that's not uncomfortable. Thanks ! God bless !
@Drag75On
@Drag75On 11 жыл бұрын
very good video :)
@campos3452
@campos3452 10 жыл бұрын
If the bible writers had endorsed the most widely held scientific views of their day, the result would be a book of glaring scientific inaccuracies. Yet the writters did not promote such unscientific misconceptions. On the contrary, they penned a number of statements that not only are scientifically sound but also directly contradicted the accepted opinions of the day.
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
@Sabianfan, you stated earlier, "I believe in everlasting life". Ok, then may I ask you, what is everlasting consist of? researching? Researching of what? If you are researching which leads to everlasting life, and you still at it, then you will never gain everlasting life that way. So, what does it mean to gain "everlasting life" then? The Bible gives not only gives us the answer to this question, it tells us, once we have it, it will make us free. No, its not the truth (but you are warm:)
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
@Sabianfan, As fregarding "planets", I am not stating they do not exist. What I am clearing implying by way of the scriptures, not in [Jude] alone, but rather, what appears to be seen by the human eye, is not what it always is. Definitely not what we call "Planets" today. The answer lies in having a Grk/Heb Concordance. Look up the word use there in the Greek. Find out the story of the Jude 6 (angels) who came down and their punishment for doing so.
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
@Sabianfan, since the Bible is God's Word, speaking to us, we know doubt accept it for what it says. Therefore, our opinion does not count. Therefore, if it calls "science" false, then it is. It is that simple. It is for us to accept it, even though we may not understand why. Yes I reject Science because God's Word said it, not me. Therefore, I believe in it what exactly it says.
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
@Sabianfan, The Bible has its own dictionary, concordances, yet it is a history Book written BY, FOR, and TO a certain people. If you do not know the history of the Bible and its people, then you will never understand what it is talking about or referring to. Many of main stream westernized Christianity, have done but fail to understand the Bible and what it really teaches. "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.". (John 4:22; Zech.8:23)
@kennethelliott9248
@kennethelliott9248 11 жыл бұрын
As much as the Bible supposedly adheres to science, it is laughably inaccurate more often than not. (Noah's flood, Noah's ark, Jonah living in a fish, talking serpents, etc...) "Sabianfan" seems like a nice enough guy who makes nice videos, but my advice to him is to actually read the JWs "science" book, "Life-How did it Get Here?" and think about the vagueness and broad generalizations of stated facts, and the lack of scholarly references.
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
I can appreciate your interest in the Bible and how you came to an understanding of knowing what the Bible really teaches, but research does not stop there. Its rather unusual I might add that you still refer to 'Science' though your coming to an understanding of the Bible. However, you fail to see that the Bible reject such 'oppositions of science falsely so called'. (1Tim.6:20 KJV) Also, that what we perceive to be 'planets' are not really what you think it is, as stated in Jude 6, 13;
@jvitne
@jvitne 11 жыл бұрын
You have not begin to study the Bible in its full sense of the word, of you have not seen it with a Hebraic mindset. I challenge you to pick up a Bible Hebrew/Greek Concordance and read the Bible again and look up the words in the meaning in its Hebrew meaning and see what I mean. Take for e.g. the name [je-hovah]. Look it up in the Hebrew (H1943; Now, look at Hosea 2:16; [Baali] H1180) Did the Most High give Moses this name in Ex.3:13-15? There was NO vowels or the letter J until the 1500s?1?
@Xenaisthebusiness
@Xenaisthebusiness 11 жыл бұрын
lol
Jehovah's Witnesses & Science #2
6:10
Sabianfan
Рет қаралды 892
The Mandelbrot Set: Atheists’ WORST Nightmare
38:25
Answers in Genesis
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Não sabe esconder Comida
00:20
DUDU e CAROL
Рет қаралды 68 МЛН
This dad wins Halloween! 🎃💀
01:00
Justin Flom
Рет қаралды 64 МЛН
How Strong is Tin Foil? 💪
00:25
Brianna
Рет қаралды 64 МЛН
Why the world population won’t exceed 11 billion | Hans Rosling | TGS.ORG
16:37
THINK Global School
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Reading Logical Fallacies
6:56
Mometrix Academy
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
My First Conlang - How NOT to Make a Language
20:52
Biblaridion
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
10 Words In A Language That Refused To Die
12:04
MQTate
Рет қаралды 220 М.
What is Spinoza's God?
19:36
Let's Talk Religion
Рет қаралды 621 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
That Time a Guy Tried to Build a Utopia for Mice and it all Went to Hell
7:58
E366 Navigating the Bible: Revelation
43:52
Saddleback Church
Рет қаралды 115 М.
Five Fallacies | Idea Channel | PBS Digital Studios
13:38
PBS Idea Channel
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Stephen Hicks: Nietzsche Perfectly Forecasts the Postmodernist Left
11:08
PhilosophyInsights
Рет қаралды 772 М.
Não sabe esconder Comida
00:20
DUDU e CAROL
Рет қаралды 68 МЛН