Boeing 737 Hot Approach due to fog | Go Around + Automatic Landing (2009)

[@justplanes]

Enjoy our channel? Please SUBCRIBE, LIKE & SHARE. Thank you! For 750 AVIATION FILMS visit our DOWNLOAD STORE shop.justplanes.com/

[@pesetamaya3509]

Boys make sure you checked that 737 everyday we don't want another incident from Indonesia so the back wing that stands in the middle that thing gets stuck and it shoots to the right and I'll pull you down so be careful we always pray for you guys

[@lb_reflections]

Personally, I think the best thing about this video was the decision to concentrate on the PFD till very nearly the end so that we can appreciate what the pilots were seeing in taking the decisions they did and monitoring their outcomes. We've missed just how dramatic the low visibility was outside, no doubt, but under the circumstances the PFD was, in my opinion, far more important. Good call!!

[@lb_reflections]

@dr3v1l1993 😆 You have a point too, yes.....

[@simbasbestie]

Oldie but goodie 😊 CAT II approach right down to 50' and a go around. Don't see this everyday. FO was so chill, even explaining what's happening during the missed.

[@redbearrc6706]

This is one of the best videos. Good camerawork and explanations of the captain and copilot

[@bertcanepa5651]

Runway visual: 20 ft above the runway???????? Amazing!

[@uyeahuyeah]

More like this please, piloting with a situation

[@gregoryrourke7417]

Absolutely awesome video and this shows how poor the visibility was and how the crew dealt with this situation and completed an auto land. Great vid.

[@wendyraymond1751]

Absolutely amazing video wonderful pilots. ..loved the view of the clouds ..brilliant filming thanks so much love an god bless x

[@aaronwhite1786]

Fog landing videos are always so cool. It makes me anxious doing it in something like X-Plane, I can't imagine doing it in real life. Autoland still weirds me out to use.

[@jonaaviation]

Good to see the paper charts once again. Haven’t seen them in such a long time. Really takes you back quite a while.

[@sohammallik7089]

Yeah....I'm enjoying

[@peterculverwell2030]

Excellent video and great information provided by the flight crew, fantastic to watch. 👏👏 Hell you could hardly see the follow-me vehicle, great landing👌👌

[@peterwillison5284]

Why do you call it a HOT approach? HOT usually means an unstable either high or fast, this approach was neither. Excellent video thanks, training question; is it logical to do doing the after landing procedures whilst coming off a runway in LVO conditions? PMs primary role, in this situation, is monitoring and to make sure that the Capt doesn't taxi on to the grass or down the wrong taxiway or it an obstacle.

[@cynic150]

This is one of the most amazing videos of the cockpit I have seen. To suddenly see the runway infront of you just as the plane is landing is quite shocking. I did not know that any plane had the ability to land in fog like that on auto pilot. As the pilot, I would find that extremely unnerving.

[@dhakaboy1]

Category III Zero-Zero visibility landing have been used since the late 60's and early 1970's !

[@valicourt]

The fail operational version of the 737 has even lower minimums. They don’t have a decision height at all in many cases and just need 75 metres.

[@deanmiles3505]

Amazing technology! Very professional crew. Take care, Be safe.

[@carolwilliams7052]

Venice - - WHOA - - that is SOME fog !!!

[@snuffthemagicdragon9721]

True professionals make it look so easy.

[@johnlehman4614]

Plane: Marco! Airport: Polo!

[@riadriad1412]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Aurayia2218]

It's like floating on top of amazing clouds with a beautiful sunset ahead of you. I enjoy listening to and watching these pilots as they control this amazing aircraft. Just to see how things happen is amazing because you learn about it. Awesome landing that sounds amazing by these great pilots. Very very foggy, but these pilots did an amazing job. Awesome video, I love it.

[@mauriziothe4166]

I LIKE how the german co-pilot trys his best to talk english

[@benwieland6241]

An old one I guess? ;-) Germania on the frequency 👍🏻

[@artnickel7624]

Looks like Fresno, CA, (KFAT), has a 3 month fog season

[@anthonyjohnson8672]

superb video,,showing displays for most of video gives you a better understanding

[@ahmkar7217]

When Autoland system flares better then "buttery landing" sh*t instagram F/O's

[@kenclark9888]

Hot approach? As in fast? One should be on speed and fully configured by the FAF?

[@Ryanboy2020]

Beautiful Autoland!

[@valicourt]

By the way, the fail operational version of this aircraft has even lower minimums. 75 metres in most cases.

[@testando6655]

So powerful. 2:12 watching dis from here with my rock playlist crancked to 11 and this on mute. Metallica, Delta Parole, ACDC etc. LIT LIT LIT!

[@salvadorcarrillo5113]

The 737 is another thumbnail for another video. How u all not know that already

[@aimhigheagle1]

Much appreciated video. Thanks to the crew. Few differences in SOP than what I am used to. CRMBBB was great approach set up procedures.

[@ajdijkvan7831]

JP......Hello! Love watching your trip.....Aviation is always amazing JP! Fantastic filming! Thanks for posting.....stay safe! See you tomorrow;) Greetings......Betsy.

[@justplanes]

Thanks very much Betsy, hope all is well!

[@jamescrego5904]

Excellent discussion about auto land!

[@andrewgonzalez4230]

At 4:50, If you really pay attention to 737 cockpit, you can spot the wearing down areas.

[@IgnaceLaplaese]

great job, and great explication, thank you ein richtig schön gute Morgen!

[@buckbuchanan5849]

Thank you for the video. Why not AUTOland on the first approach, if the capability existed? Would save fuel and time?

[@cfg003]

They were not allowed to Autoland since the minimum RVR was not met. Even with an Autoland you need a minimum RVR.

[@buckbuchanan5849]

@@cfg003 Thank you

[@KuostA]

@@cfg003 what does RVR mean?

[@cfg003]

@@KuostA it means Runway Visual Range. Its the distance you are able to see horizontally from the cockpit to the last visible runway light.

[@hugochan2821]

Great and informative. However, is this cat 2 or cat 3?

[@photoholic11]

wow, nice landing with such low vis.

[@LHA675]

Love this movie my favorite DVD at home 😍

[@thegteam4349]

Amazing. Absolutely amazing.

[@victoryera2944]

WOW!What a quick climb.

[@fancybobbybob]

Please just post the video, enough with these premieres already, thanks

[@theypeedonmyrug]

@suspicionofdeceit Kind of posh, like baiting

[@MusicAnirban]

Agreed, its a horrible feature - premiering!! Hate it.

[@danmcguire7728]

It's what pays the bills, making money.

[@justplanes]

Our videos do better if we premiere them so obviously that’s what any creator on you tube would want however if you would give me so valid reasons I’d be happy to take them into consideration. Keep in mind some of our viewers enjoy being able to communicate with others during these premieres and have gotten used to this feature. Another good feature is you can see what’s coming up ans put a reminder if you wanna catch it but happy to hear what you dislike...

[@MusicAnirban]

@@justplanes If its related to profits then no second thoughts about it but for me, the joy of seeing the video all at once is much more than waiting in anticipation. For some reason, psychologically this premiere thing doesn't go well.

[@andrewstorm8240]

Wow that is foggy, have to make sure they don’t see another aircraft when taxing

[@FoxtrotSierra_FL410]

9:00 The described system is called fail-operational instead of fail-passive!

[@hairyman1544]

Should've started filming the outside earlier, now the shot of the landing is way too bright. Can't really appreciate the low vis conditions.

[@sandrasoares3311]

Good job! God bless you and have a great day.!🤗👠🤠

[@eckhardf4905]

Ich hoffe nur, dass der eingestellte Luftdruck von 1013 HP (normalerweise der Standard Luftdruck ab 5 oder 6 Tausend Fuß) auch der aktuelle war .....

[@kallek5655]

Bei 7:18 sagt der Controller, dass das QNH 1013 ist, passt :)

[@riadriad1412]

Just planes de très belle vidéo

[@LtColDaddy71]

A "hot approach" I do not recall that procedure in my 30 plus years of flying, 19 of the in the 7-3. LOL, I wonder what the check list says. "Hot Approach Checklist" don't recall that one.

[@domc327]

These days the kids call it a "spicy approach" get with the times old man

[@auwz66]

Jeez the fog was so thick you could not really make out the sides of the runway!!

[@nenblom]

Awesome video!!

[@edgarquintana_]

Good job Crew !

[@acemcgill]

And there a those people that think pilots aren't needed anymore. Weather like that, without a human pilot there, I wouldn't step on a plane.

[@dmimcg]

I do that all the time in my Piper Archer- what's the big deal?

[@KIKIESSAM]

Nice video!

[@matteofitzpatrick446]

➶ great video 7star

[@vladimirfromukraine419]

I even was being scared to watch this video when the airplane was approaching the runway. Pilots need to have steel balls.

[@vladimirfromukraine419]

@@jamescollier3 500' Are you alive?

[@luckyme4136]

Missed approach in a 737 in low visibility scares me. Remember Flydubai 981?

[@kallek5655]

Sure, and they almost repeated their crash last year. But Armavia also had a similar crash with an A320. In the end, some basic piloting skills must simply be available. Also, in this video it was a fully automatic go-around.

[@azamiruddin]

I eager to see outside the cockpit when they perform go around first time. How the actual condition looks like from above. And also the landing.

[@foxyroxstar]

the closed captions interpretations like GHWBush on The JFK Dallas deep gov Job!

[@kepitingsalto_]

Boeing 737-700 ?? I see the Vref is very low just 132 knots

[@kadennorman1625]

♐ great vid 4star

[@billyhillk5726]

Outstanding 👌🇺🇸

[@peterp4319]

did they use auto speedbrakes ? or was it a manual speedbrake deploy ?

[@adrianostrowicz2758]

Old times... when charts was on a paper.

[@brysoncooley1701]

⇈ great vid 9star

[@s1nb4d59]

Always love these vids but would be great to see more outside the cockpit views rather than mostly instrument panel,especially on approach 8)

[@larsw8776]

Since it was a really foggy approach, filming the panel was the best decision.

[@s1nb4d59]

@@larsw8776 yeah i understand,just would have been cool to see the runway appear out of the mist,not that the instrument panel isn't interesting to watch 8)

[@justplanes]

Nothing to see out the cockpit, total fog... so you would have seen whiteness... and now you got to see the important instruments...

[@MrShepardDog]

Not a HOT approach. Cat 3 autopilot landing....

[@neillsmart213]

Beautiful :)

[@modeermodeer]

I would leave the autopilot on as long as possible on rollout just in case your vis deteriorates .this was always a debrief item working as a check airman.

[@joerch96]

The B 737 doesn't have an automatic rollout mode! The Pilot has to take over lateral control after touch down.

[@tamefroggy]

@@joerch96 It does! only on CAT3B cetified ILS sytems like any other aircraft

[@Hk-uw8my]

No you can do this. As we could see on the fma there was no rollout feature. The Autopilots must be disconnected immediately after touchdown.

[@Hk-uw8my]

​@@tamefroggy no, most 737s just like the one you see in the video are fitted with a fail passive autopilot system, the autopilot cannot control the rudder. Only fail op 737s with a rudder channel have the ability to track the centerline after touchdown by relying on rudder, nose wheel steering and main gear tracking. And it can work even with a cat I ILS.

[@venusssharman5922]

Fabtastic!

[@JohnnyRawks]

Is 132kts typical for landing? I was under the impression that it was typically 140kts at touch down.

[@AkiraAkiyama]

Actually 737 has a higher landing speed if they use flap 30 compared to the other Boeing planes. But flap 40 can be used for shorter runways or during bad weathers/visibility. So they decided to use flap 40 and which gives them a slower speed for landing. Plus they were not heavy so 131kt is an appropriate speed for landing. If they are basically empty, the speed can drop down to 125kt or so.

[@JohnnyRawks]

@@AkiraAkiyama Thanks!

[@Vidas666]

Is it was CATIII or CATII landing?

[@Driver-retired]

that was a CAT III -- CAT II allows for visual references at DH usually approx 200' but not less than 100' as well as at least 1,200' for RVR (runway visual range) - CAT III does not (DH 50' RVR 700') . Pilots need to be trained for using either, aircraft needs the equipment as well as the runway ILS tech CAT installed. I've done a lot of CAT IIs when I was working in B737-200s - retired now -- CAT IIIs are another story. No CATIIIs - a bit scarier --- MJD

[@charlieoneal2707]

♐ great vid 1star

[@rajbahadurverma6762]

Very Nice

[@michaelhallo7320]

"Alles gesehen" .....bis auf die Landebahn ...

[@TH75767]

Missed on the first approach...5400lbs of fuel...you go hold? Glad the weather improved.....

[@RomeoJulietCharlie]

5400kg. This is in Europe.

[@quickpickle]

That was some thick fog.

[@scottfranco1962]

Vis so low they needed an escort car to get off the runway.

[@ravensrulzaviation]

Love AP LANDINGS

[@aljack1979]

That gear was brought up too quick for a correct go around procedure Arnt you suppose to retract flaps get to a safe altitude before retracting landing gear?

[@kallek5655]

No. The only parameter you need is a positive rate of climb, just like on take-off. Only when you achieve a safe altitude you can accelerate and retract the flaps further (they're set to 15 for a dual engine go-around upon initiation of the go-around).

[@kishanpraful3564]

Waiting

[@emilhallweg7291]

But in the 787 Dreamliner doesnt work

[@jakubleschtina7734]

why they do not use autoland?

[@farhanhassan5966]

⇪ thanks 2star

[@frankgallagher5786]

too much chic chat below 1000'. no mention of diversion plans during the briefing even though RVR's were below minima.

[@se-kmg355]

6:00, RVR is at 200, then at approach it is reported at 175. You are allowed to start the approach until the outer marker, even if the visibility is below the minimum required. And by the video, their SOP seems to be at 500 feet, and what he is telling us is what he is looking for.

[@caseyjones7404]

Thats how you do that folks.

[@justplanes]

very true

[@saito125]

Listed as 1080 HD, barely 480p in reality. Lowering the bar, JustPlanes?

[@larsw8776]

2009!

[@justplanes]

It’s an old video and we don’t list 1080, you tube detects and lists that. If you watch our new videos you would know we certainly don’t lower the bar

[@leonidasg0039]

How can they choose to autoland if the minimums are 50' RA??

[@fbw_pilot]

Only CAT IIIC don't have any minimum. CAT II and CAT III always have minimum.

[@MartinNeep]

The 737 in this video has a fail passive autoflight system, therefore they are limited to a CAT IIIA approach. CAT IIIA has a DH of not less than 50ft and reported touchdown RVR not less than 200m.

[@stevenmc4446]

bloody youtube ads every couple of minutes

[@justplanes]

You can download the complete 3 hour film for $15 with no ads ;)

[@kallek5655]

Using the uBlock Origin addon here. Haven't seen youtube ads in ages :)

[@jensaugust743]

​@@kallek5655 havent paid a creator for their hard work in ages* There, fixed your comment

[@kallek5655]

​@@jensaugust743 Fixed? Lol, you didn't fix anything, as my comment wasn't wrong in the first place, you just added your own.

[@stevencoffone288]

Approaching minimums...50...10...

[@randyjohnson6845]

He didn't have 200' visibility

[@jetPower1960]

Wow 4.4 gals of fuel left. That was close. Bravo.

[@richardsylvanus2717]

What's a hot approach?

[@justplanes]

That’s how the pilot called it and explained it.

[@emilhallweg7291]

how you Programm Auto Landing

[@Warka400]

Put the ILS frequency in both NAV-Receivers and when on final activate the second autopilot (CMD A and CMD B). Now you have told the plane to do an autoland.

[@a3300000]

4.6 on the fuel? Ouch.

[@kallek5655]

Why? They probably took a bit more to be able to hold for some time as low vis was forcast, plus they might have had to choose a more distant alternate due to weather conditions.

[@a3300000]

@@kallek5655 4.6 isn’t much fuel in those conditions.

[@kallek5655]

@@a3300000 Maybe we should agree on the unit first. This one's using the metric system, therefore having 4.6 tons in its tanks, which equals about 10140lbs.

[@a3300000]

@@kallek5655 I see.

[@MrMarkatgrc]

👍👍👍

[@owenwolf5000]

Inexperience shows, having received the Vis after the OM they should of continued to there minima - or brief for a cat2 to start - Disconnected the autopilot to soon on the roll out

[@TheRubendeB]

Are you sure?? 🤣

[@Cl4rendon]

TUIFly ex Hapag Lloyd.

[@Aviationist2k24]

Scary shit brah

[@ropermav]

Great flying, shame he spoiled it right at touchdown. AP disengagement should be after nose wheel touchdown. Other than that, I👍

[@vw72713]

I just tried to look this up. The FCTM states for the fail-passive system "After touchdown : • A/T disconnects after 2 seconds • disengage A/P • use rudder to maintain directional control"