Lauren Chen/RoamingMillennial & VeganGains Debate [ft. AskYourself & RantingMonkey] (13/05/17)

  Рет қаралды 5,735

Vegan Debate Archive

Vegan Debate Archive

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 65
@phillipjackson1517
@phillipjackson1517 4 жыл бұрын
There needs to be another discussion purely on the ethics of eating animals because that's when it would become obviously clear that there is no moral justification for eating meat. This discussion kind of got bogged down on so many different things right when it was about to become clear that there is a double standard in the way she applies her ethics when differentiating between humans and animals.
@Redhotquagmire
@Redhotquagmire 4 ай бұрын
"Animals can't empathize." ...Has this woman EVER met an animal before? Holy shit.
@Chadonke
@Chadonke 24 күн бұрын
This is the same kinda stuff that white slave owners and nazis used to say to justify their actions "they're animals, we're superior". I hate this supremacist mindset.
@jeanpopa2900
@jeanpopa2900 2 жыл бұрын
Dude everything that rantingmonkey says is so irrational its actually sad
@Lozwave
@Lozwave 4 ай бұрын
He’s simping hard that’s why, what a douche
@SOOTHSAYERVEGA
@SOOTHSAYERVEGA 3 жыл бұрын
“Cows don’t feel empathy” *defines empathy but then turns around and eats jellyfish* ... starting to question if humans feel empathy when it comes down to what on there plate for lunch.
@nathanielg.m.888
@nathanielg.m.888 4 жыл бұрын
Roaming word salad
@kaspermuje9597
@kaspermuje9597 6 жыл бұрын
classic debate
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia Жыл бұрын
I feel bad for her. Since she’s doesn’t know much about the topic or did her homework.
@jallen911
@jallen911 11 ай бұрын
She refuses to acknowledge when she’s clearly contradicted herself after Richard continuously points out the science to her. You can’t debate someone like this, she’s completely dogmatic.
@MrMasterDebate
@MrMasterDebate 2 жыл бұрын
Richard ruined this debate by interrupting.
@christopheryoung2874
@christopheryoung2874 3 ай бұрын
I watch all old Lauren Chen videos that KZbin throws my way
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia Жыл бұрын
Our brains need the cholesteroeral about Inflammatory System. So, Even external stress and psychological stress can cause artery blockage. study has shown that nearly 75 percent of patients hospitalized for a heart attack had cholesterol levels that would indicate they were not at high risk for a cardiovascular event.
@tallwaters9708
@tallwaters9708 7 ай бұрын
Probably because they suddenly changed to a healthier diet after a lifetime of high cholesterol levels
@PieInTheSky9
@PieInTheSky9 6 ай бұрын
She's so fine
@docmemphis2760
@docmemphis2760 7 ай бұрын
Oh the NTT trap
@justinambrose3107
@justinambrose3107 2 жыл бұрын
Man she looks good..skin Glow 🌟
@swedensy
@swedensy 2 жыл бұрын
That's what make-up is for
@EricPeelMusic
@EricPeelMusic 8 ай бұрын
Don’t be a fool. Its a gallon of gucci on cheeks and a vile of bleach on the chompers.
@tallwaters9708
@tallwaters9708 7 ай бұрын
Yeah very good looking
@maxsk44
@maxsk44 Ай бұрын
Have you ever heard about make up and filters? BTW Vegan Gains is glowing as well)
@MovieNighht
@MovieNighht Жыл бұрын
No idea who Lauren is .but I back the pretty girl 🤣
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia Жыл бұрын
Vegan gains was wrong when mentioned Meat eaters and vegan are not healthy as long when eating both Whole Foods. That has been debunked due many inaccuracies from what I saw he’s talking about. Study was done of meat eaters and vegetarians who shop in health food stores and so are, presumably, pursuing healthy lifestyles. result? Both groups were equally healthy, and they lived longer than those who don’t pay so much attention to proper nutrition. This is known as the “healthy eater effect and it explains why it’s so difficult to tease out the influence of any individual food group or nutrient when we’re trying to figure out how to eat healthy. Another large study, of 245,000 people, found no difference in mortality between vegetarians, pescatarians, and meat eaters. Everything we eat (or avoid eating) adds up. Just as it’s possible to be a sickly, overweight vegan, it’s possible to be a healthy, well nourished meat eater You just have to eat smart.
@none-nd8nu
@none-nd8nu 7 ай бұрын
True, a well-planned diet is required for healthiness. Except one diet reduces cruelty and one diet does not.
@BurntMcgurnt
@BurntMcgurnt 4 ай бұрын
Isaac simply cannot argue or debate almost anything other than name the trait its pretty pathetic
@Lozwave
@Lozwave 4 ай бұрын
Because it’s solid foundation
@BurntMcgurnt
@BurntMcgurnt 4 ай бұрын
@@Lozwave only if you think like him obviously you do but most of don't but that's kinda irrelevant thats not what I'm saying that's all he ever says
@reflex9238
@reflex9238 Ай бұрын
@@BurntMcgurnt so you’re saying you don’t believe in human rights and believe needlessly stabbing humans is fine? You can remain consistent with opposing veganism with that mind set but it’s absolutely psychotic.
@prajalpi
@prajalpi 4 жыл бұрын
19:02
@mak898
@mak898 Жыл бұрын
Lol. Look how great the meat in her diet is doing her. She is absolutely gorgeous and totally right in this arguement. The first point speaks for itself how defensive they get over vitamin B12. Jeez lol
@VeganDefinition
@VeganDefinition Жыл бұрын
That's the issue with weasel ass men like you these days. You replace someone's makeup and looks with their lack of knowledge and ignorance. Only an ignorant egoistic clown couldn't see that Lauren's knowledge was not on par with her opponents in this debate. Keep masturbating to her makeup while she's losing this debate though goofy.
@danksamosa3952
@danksamosa3952 7 ай бұрын
makeup does wonders
@maxsk44
@maxsk44 Ай бұрын
If you don't know how to use makeup - there is a tons of information around just look it up. BTW do you know that she supports war and was taking money from Kremlin?
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia Жыл бұрын
She’s wrong about cannibalism. But, I don’t advise anyone to do it. It’s against the law in some states evan with consent. Also, morally wrong in our society.
@PieInTheSky9
@PieInTheSky9 2 жыл бұрын
She's hot and smart
@swedensy
@swedensy 2 жыл бұрын
Smart????
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia Жыл бұрын
False: Red meat contains various types of fat not only saturated fat, but also omega 6 fats (more in corn fed feedlot cows) and omega 3 fats (in grass fed meat). Furthermore, the link between saturated fat and heart disease has been disproven. Studies of more than 600,000 people in nineteen countries “countries found no link between saturated fat and heart disease. Another study of 135,000 people from eighteen countries and five continents over ten years showed a lower risk of heart disease and death from eating saturated fat. Like to add Americans are eating less Red meat at anytime in history. So, No, Americans are Not eating too much red meat. Perhaps chicken. Lol. Chowdhury R, Warnakula S, Kunutsor S, et al. Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160
@samdaniels2
@samdaniels2 Жыл бұрын
Why don't you go and debate Dr Avi or the Nutrivore?
@kal.el123
@kal.el123 3 ай бұрын
That study was completely retracted and reissued lol. Walter Willet and a group of nutritional scientists wrote to the editor and got it retracted. This is utterly hilarious but they imported the WRONG numbers from the cohort studies they referenced. They got the polyunsaturated and saturated fat data backwards lol. Not even kidding. Look up Walter Willet and his colleagues letter to the editor on the Ann Intern site, which got the study retracted and reissued. Even when they reissued the paper, they didn't fully acknowledge their mistakes. Ironically, that study showed that saturated fat actually is harmful for cardiovascular health, and polyunsaturated fat has an inverse effect. Hilarious
@kal.el123
@kal.el123 3 ай бұрын
Also unsure how Americans are eating less red meat than anytime in history? Not sure what statistical calculus you performed to reach that conclusion.
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia 3 ай бұрын
@@kal.el123 While the retraction and reissue of the study due to data import errors are noteworthy, dismissing the reissued study entirely overlooks several key aspects of scientific research and its self-correcting nature. Errors and Corrections are Part of Science: Mistakes in data handling, while unfortunate, are not uncommon in scientific research. The retraction and correction process is a critical component of scientific integrity. The fact that the study was retracted, corrected, and reissued shows that the scientific community is committed to accuracy and transparency. It's not a reason to dismiss the corrected findings. Scientific Consensus: The corrected findings align with the broader scientific consensus that saturated fat is harmful to cardiovascular health and polyunsaturated fat is beneficial. This is supported by numerous other studies and meta-analyses. Focusing on a single study's initial error ignores the weight of evidence supporting these conclusions. Reissued Study Still Valid: The reissued study, even if not fully acknowledging the initial mistakes, underwent the same rigorous peer review process. The corrected data and conclusions are what matter most. Dismissing the reissued study simply because it doesn't emphasize the initial error undermines the scientific method's role in self-correction. Importance of Peer Review: Walter Willett and his colleagues' intervention exemplifies the importance of peer review and scientific discourse. Their actions led to the correction of the study, ensuring that accurate information is disseminated. This collaborative effort among scientists is a strength, not a weakness. In summary, while the initial error is indeed noteworthy, it does not invalidate the corrected study's findings or the broader scientific understanding of fats and cardiovascular health. The process of correction and reissue demonstrates the scientific method's robustness and should not be dismissed lightly.
@MikeCastelonia
@MikeCastelonia 3 ай бұрын
@@kal.el123 Yes, red meat consumption in the United States has declined over the past several decades. Here are some points to support this: Historical Data: USDA data shows that per capita red meat consumption has decreased from its peak in the 1970s and 1980s. For instance, red meat consumption was around 138.4 pounds per person in 1970, and it dropped to approximately 104.7 pounds per person in 2019. Health Awareness: Increased awareness of health risks associated with high red meat consumption has led to a reduction in intake. Public health campaigns and guidelines have encouraged people to eat less red meat. Dietary Changes: There has been a shift towards plant-based diets and alternative protein sources. The popularity of vegetarianism, veganism, and plant-based meat substitutes has contributed to the decline. Environmental Concerns: Concerns about the environmental impact of red meat production have led to a decrease in consumption. More people are choosing sustainable food options..... Economic Factors: Rising prices of red meat compared to other protein sources have influenced consumer choices, leading to reduced red meat consumption. accurate to state that red meat consumption in the U.S. has declined from its historical peaks, claiming that Americans are eating less red meat than at any time in history is an overstatement without comprehensive statistical support and I thank you for making aware of my mistake. Methodological Considerations is big part of my depth analysis....
@jasonharrington5200
@jasonharrington5200 4 жыл бұрын
oh who cares what these people are yapping about she's hot
@prajalpi
@prajalpi 4 жыл бұрын
"Having seen the supposed beauty of a woman’s heavy breasts and her thin waist, do not become agitated and illusioned, for these attractive features are simply transformations of fat, flesh and various other disgusting ingredients. You should consider this in your mind again and again." (Mohamudgara-stotra 3)
@prajalpi
@prajalpi 4 жыл бұрын
"Sometimes, as if blinded by the dust of a whirlwind, the conditioned soul sees the beauty of the opposite sex, which is called pramadā. Being thus bewildered, he is raised upon the lap of a woman, and at that time his good senses are overcome by the force of passion. He thus becomes almost blind with lusty desire and disobeys the rules and regulations governing sex life. He does not know that his disobedience is witnessed by different demigods, and he enjoys illicit sex in the dead of night, not seeing the future punishment awaiting him." (Bhāgavata Purāṇa 5.14.9)
@sufficientmagister9061
@sufficientmagister9061 2 жыл бұрын
@@prajalpi Krishna did not follow such advice when he was pleasuring himself with all of those females he collected. Shiva did not follow such advice either.
@swedensy
@swedensy 2 жыл бұрын
@@sufficientmagister9061 that's why i follow Buddha. Beautiful women are not even welocome into temple cause she will bring evil and trouble.
@mrmeaner5901
@mrmeaner5901 4 жыл бұрын
Music art architecture poetry, get me the cow that can compose a symphony and I'll maybe buy you a beyond meat burger Richard or is it Dick?
@MarijuanaGuy
@MarijuanaGuy 3 жыл бұрын
Get me a cow that has fingers and the coordination to play an instrument first.
@Grande-Dame
@Grande-Dame 2 жыл бұрын
Most humans can’t compose a symphony so by your logic it’s ok to k*ll and eat them.
@cindy652
@cindy652 2 жыл бұрын
you help your newborn baby to stand up the day it is born then the cow can do what humans do for humans.
@fahrenheigh
@fahrenheigh Жыл бұрын
Give me a baby that can compose like Mozart and then I'll start giving them moral consideration
Debating Douglas Murray on Gender, Reparations, and Extinction Rebellion
1:23:29
The Veganism Debate with 'Vegan Gains' - Destiny Debates
2:12:26
啊?就这么水灵灵的穿上了?
00:18
一航1
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН
怎么能插队呢!#火影忍者 #佐助 #家庭
00:12
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
My Daughter's Dumplings Are Filled With Coins #funny #cute #comedy
00:18
Funny daughter's daily life
Рет қаралды 33 МЛН
Seja Gentil com os Pequenos Animais 😿
00:20
Los Wagners
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
CARNIVORES VS VEGANS: A Debate for the Ages!
1:24:35
Hammad c
Рет қаралды 75 М.
DAVID PAKMAN DESTROYS VEGAN IN DEBATE! (Full Response)
13:56
Lifting Vegan Logic
Рет қаралды 16 М.
The Vegan Gains Interview
1:14:38
TomDark
Рет қаралды 61 М.
INTERVIEW: 13-YEAR-OLD FORCED TO TRANSITION
1:16:32
Buck Angel
Рет қаралды 591 М.
🔴 Sinatra_Says Argues Against Veganism (Facepalm-Worthy)
1:15:28
Ask Yourself
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Carneval vs Ask Yourself Debate Vegan Ethics ... Carneval
52:27
MrGirl Confronts Destiny After Getting Ban And Fuentes Drama Explained
48:54
Last Night On Destiny
Рет қаралды 113 М.
啊?就这么水灵灵的穿上了?
00:18
一航1
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН