The Economy of Tomorrow | YouTube Documentary

[@herbalistanutricionista]

Rich will get richer, poor will get poorer. No matter when you read it.

[@aidanaldrich7795]

Ok doomer. That literally is not happening anywhere except extreme socialist countries like Venezuela or North Korea

[@neil45845]

That is never going to change....

[@clmped]

Rich might get richer, but poor will get less poor, seems to me.

[@jozzieification]

What does it mean to be poor? Technological development always has a deflationary effect on society, meaning that the lower classes of society can afford the technologies and thus afford more comfort. 20 years ago, having unlimited internet was considered a luxury that only the upper class could afford. Today, even the most basic tea seller in India has a smartphone with internet (no offense intended to the Indian people).

[@twinsoultarot473]

@@herbalistanutricionista only conclusion of that is for for billions of people to be killed. So understand that that's what your blithe statement is going to lead to.

[@GovindSingh-oy5ex]

Its not about economy. Its about few ruling the most. 😢😢😢

[@bohrapradeep]

A fact , the question is are you in the circle :-) .

[@georgeoduor8940]

This always leads to the downfall of society. I’m afraid the same thing will happen. Total collapse of nations.

[@RM360CR]

Its always been like taht in western asia middle eastern societies except may be those ancient civilization in the americas..

[@Kitti2Pretti]

The even more shocking statistic is “the most “ going along with

[@HH-kc1ym]

Yes. Don't let the far left take the county, once they take it we will loose all our freedom as an individual human's.

[@khaly_Mark]

Ai will not replace people, but people with Ai will displace the people without

[@peternguyen2022]

And Superior people with AI will replace people with AI and people with Superior AI will replace people with AI

[@user-ux7pj1ix6s]

​@@peternguyen2022 exactly. And I don't know if you would mind if I use that at some point but that is exactly my sentiments. To say that it's trippy is an understatement. And to some degree I feel like it's a falsehood. And I don't think it'll make it that far. And if it does that's where it will end. It seems as though it's trying to take over the original infrastructure so to speak

[@RM360CR]

But everyone is replace eventually no one lives for ever and not everyone is going to join the Ai revolution also population is going to drop severly and most of those will be those connected to technology because its a very toxic way of life....

[@basemmansour1293]

True

[@thornsaresharp]

And then superior people will replace AI They will realize that artificial intelligence is not intelligence. It is narrowing down human intelligence by applying it to more narrowed down situations.

[@TruthFinder7839]

I’m 68 and I’ve seen so many changes in my lifetime and tell the doubters for this video, that most of their content is fact based for the past and accurate for the present perspective. The future though is hard to predict accurately for the time it takes for the changes to be completed for their predictions. Inevitably the jobs will be lost to machines and software called AI. 😢

[@KentBrono]

this is why it will be more advantageous to invest in AI Stocks

[@besreal3419]

It doesn't matter though because birth rates are dropping. So we won't have surplus humans who need jobs.

[@raghvendrathakur4246]

I don’t believe in this dystopian future. Coming from AI related area, I expect nature of current jobs to change and different high quality jobs to emerge. Some of new jobs, that has emerged in AI field which will become common across all industries are : Model developer, Model validator, Model risk auditor etc. A lot of new jobs will emerge due to possibility of meeting unmet needs of persons. Some of those unmet needs that I can think of, are following :Personal Architect services for design of houses, Personal interior design services, Personal law services, personal financial management services, personal trip planners, personal media services, personal translator services, AI assisted cooking, Personalised medical services, Ivy League quality education for everyone who wants to learn irrespective of country and language, Air taxis for remote hilly areas or other difficult terrain, Space tourism for common people, Geriatric care services. So, instead of trying to resist change, just try to adapt to the change. The future will be better.

[@DinamikaSoe]

Very thoughtful and visionary, do you make YT videos on that?

[@sheraton31]

Future won’t be better because the purpose is not to make people s lives better but to increase a minority’s net worth

[@pbear216]

You are so lost brother........

[@tyresejackson2601]

No you are.​@@pbear216

[@kaustubh9917]

Amen !

[@ThandoQolo-e1o]

The difference with the previous industrial revolutions is that they sought to enhance the human standard of living. They did not seek to replace humans in any form.

[@dylanjayatilaka8533]

Not sure what you mean. Mechanisation replaced farm workers. Textile factories replaced humans in cottage industries. Computers replaced huge numbers of people in filing and libraries. I don't know if there was ever any intention to improve human standards of living, only to do things with less effort i.e. increase productivity. There's nothing wrong with that as long as everyone benefits equally - that is the issue - has always been the issue.

[@PeterParker-wj3cr]

@@dylanjayatilaka8533 This is a specious argument. The industrial revolution was disruptive. Any new disruptive technology or idea is designed to improve whatever it's replacing. It's wasn't the intention of machinery to displace farmers and any other manual labour type jobs. It's axiomatic that the industrial age improved all of our lives. But in the process, it put a lot of hard working people out of work. This is just capitalism. Only the strong will survive.

[@dylanjayatilaka8533]

@@PeterParker-wj3cr I think we are largely in agreement, no? I wanted to say capitalism leads to disruption since it is concerned only with the profit motive - maximizing output relative to input. So capitalism places downward pressure on human input - ergo it is disruptive. Where I might take issue with you, is with your use of the word "improve" especially in regards to human "lives". There is nothing in capitalism which requires the improvement in the human condition. On the contrary, for example, in the early days of factory industrialization, children were forced into labour, and air quality in London & Manchester became unhealthy. It was only when capitalism was tempered by strong institutions of liberal democracy - that actual "improvement" occurred. Likewise, your evolutionary metaphor that "only the strong survive" is not correct - the correct statement is that "the best adapted survive". Strength and adaptation are not the same thing. Regarding adaptation: a situation we may be in now, which would not have occurred previously, is that it's is not just human labour and effort that could be replaced, but potentially, humanity itself. (Also, the notion of a free and diverse market is not occurring due to massive concentration - as has happened in the past - e.g. the railroad situation at the turn of the century in the USA, the Rockerfellers and all that - those monopolies were crushed). Anyway, I don't know about you, but I would not regard the removal of democratic human intellectual efforts from society as a good thing, certainly not an "improvement". Being an optimist, I fully expect the majority of humans to *eventually* gain the upper hand - through strong government and liberal democratic institutions - as has happened in the past. Only then will there be a real "improvement" in the human condition. But it's not a guaranteed outcome. Some think a technofeudal society may result - I hope not - such a feudal system was in place in Europe, and also Asia, for millennia. Hopefully we don't go back to that garbage situation - but there are disturbing indications - from the modern Chinese state.

[@dylanjayatilaka8533]

@@PeterParker-wj3cr Respectfully, disagree. Unless you qualify your word "improve" and "our" in your statement. If you refer to my original comment, you will see that, I believe, we are in fact in agreement, since your word "disruptive" in your own reply implies that there is at least, for a certain subpopulation, time degree of time where it is indeed, not at all an improvement. The question is: how long does this "disruption" last, and, does it improve the lot of the majority, and most importantly, what is the time-frame for this so called "benefit". Keep in mind that humans have only a finite lifetime, and it is clear to me, given that the reproduction rate in advanced societies is decreasing well below replacement rate, that the so-called "benefits" are not actually an improvement from a whole population population viewpoint. This is the viewpoint I take --- that of sustainable benefit over the medium to long term. And, as I said, this can be measured by inequality --- that was my main point. Sorry --- it's not a yes/no answer, but qualified agreement on some of your points.

[@styx1272]

The real problem is what will people do with their life with a UBI. Meaning and purpose . Cities structures need to be rethought To generate exercise and purpose

[@walkerhaw5468]

Tomorrow is utterly grim. 2024 is the new 1929.

[@charlitoadams777]

Didn't the stock market crash in 1929?

[@walkerhaw5468]

@@charlitoadams777 YES,YES,YES. Mmmmmmmmmmm oh yes. 2024 is gonna be even harder baby.

[@luxushauseragency]

The prevailing mindset in the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profit over progress. Instead of capitalizing on advancements in medical science to reduce our dependence on drugs, there's a greater focus on developing new therapies to maintain consumer reliance. With this short-sighted approach, our young species risks a precarious future on a planet that's survived for millions of years.

[@dave35311]

No jobs, no consumers, no economy…

[@claudiapost-schultzke7216]

on purpose

[@x1k790]

UBI will be a temporary fix

[@paolotonolo1140]

They need to build a massive Fleet of Titan Submarines for the rest of the CEO'E and politicians

[@Seancarter2010]

They are going to change the rules. More than likely we’ll be a country or a world of slaves. People working for food and shelter. The rich already have massive sums of money so they’ll have an economy just one without us

[@tmadden4951]

There is always something to do. Work is a distraction

[@fabiodeoliveiraribeiro1602]

This video begins by talking about an economy without humans in which productivity is infinitely amplified by the intensive and growing use of robots and artificial intelligence. It then explores the problems of cities where jobs will be destroyed. And it ends by demanding greater equalization in gender relations in a labor market that has already begun to be affected by the fourth industrial revolution and will obviously be extinguished. The schizophrenia of the script seems obvious to me. It is not possible to dehumanize the economy and, at the same time, humanize labor relations that will cease to exist. The bright future of the fourth industrial revolution is being seen in the government of Javier Milei in Argentina, a country in which tens of millions of people have been thrown into poverty and are now being encouraged to sell their children or sell their own organs in order to continue eating. Will the future be the industrialization of human flesh to feed a growing army of useless people? When I was a child, Soylent Green was just a science fiction movie. But judging by the content of this video, it is becoming more and more reality, because the factual truth continues to be hidden by a schizophrenic script. In an extremely profitable dehumanized economy characterized by the optimized accumulation of private wealth guaranteed by hollowed-out States in which there is no place for the interests of ordinary human beings (the majority of the population), the result can only be an endless humanitarian tragedy.

[@ThomasMoreno-pk8zf]

That sums up this video 😢

[@twinsoultarot473]

It already is that yes it's probably going to get worse. Automation and machines are our salvation. Have you heard of a resource-based economy? An AI LED resource-based economy will solve all our problems.

[@shawnbrooks6447]

Well said! 👏🏼

[@twinsoultarot473]

@@fabiodeoliveiraribeiro1602 yep, this is why we need to move toward a resource-based economy before all the jobs are automated and everybody is displaced.

[@perrytornado]

Jobs and conventional economics are perniciously impacting on our health and the health of the planet/ The communist economy is dystopian and its obsolescence is imminent and inevitable/ The gradual deterioration of the masses creates jobs/ Idiocy and corruption creates jobs/ Porn star business mentality of egotistical dolts creates jobs/ No wonder consummate professionals are jobless and utterly detest the thought of working a job/ The income is inadequate and the employer leeches off of the employee's energy expenditure/ That is a legal crime/

[@LesleyGrilli-fl6gy]

Brilliant acting. A poignant theme on grief, love and loss. Showed how life challenges faith and beliefs. A real tear jerker. Anthony Hopkins as always amazing. If you've ever lost anyone you love through life circumstances or death I'm sure you will relate. ❤

[@robertrogue7412]

That lady speaking from Rio de Janeiro, Can feel the passion of your profession your words very moving. From NZ 🪶

[@justtellme3775]

I don't understand how we get power outages during the summer when we all run our AC at the same time and we are encouraged to not use our washer and dryers from 4-9 pm to save on energy but aren't all these robots going to run on energy? How will there then be enough energy to recharge them all and not have power problems. I'm sorry but I don't get it. Also won't it be more expensive to repair a robot than to replace a human worker? 🤔 Also, how are robots going to pay taxes? I have so many questions 😅

[@Burmeseti]

To answer your last question: AI and robots don't need to pay taxes because they will not be receiving an income. Not only will they not receive an income but they will not require Healthcare, vacation, sick days, etc. They will require maintenance, power, surveillance and optimization but it will still be more affordable than hiring people for higher paying jobs. For labor jobs that require physical labor, I do think that humans may still be more economical than robots. Government taxes at that point will probably be paid by the companies as well as from the goods and services that are sold.

[@cottagefarm9799]

Oh my gosh, PAY ATTENTION - AI, data centers, etc demand more energy than 75% of humans use currently. And its about to go way beyond that. Ai, 🤪

[@Wowkqngsij]

Fusion nearby

[@Live_WildMT]

And don't forget, you are also supposed to have an electric car to charge.

[@brianatippens3010]

There’s plenty of renewable energy on this planet that we have barely even begun to harness. From solar, to wind, to tidal, to the most abundant and powerful of them all…geothermal. We have the technological capability to harness these energy sources now…but as usual capitalism holds us back. The oil lobby would rather light the planet on fire to earn a few billion more dollars than allow humanity to continue to progress. We have plenty of energy…that’s not the problem. People also seem incapable of imagining a world beyond capitalism. Let the machines do the boring and dangerous jobs. Let the companies automate everything and then wonder why profits are falling. Either they will have to give us money to buy their products n the form of UBI or they will have to admit that capitalism is not sustainable…especially once society breaks down because people are desperate.

[@BitchbetterHavemymoney-k1f]

I believe Africa has the potential to rule the world, it has everything it needs, it just has to get itself together!

[@TheVafa95]

Humanity's pattern of thinking has to change. So there has to be a unified vision of where humanity wants to go. Without a unified vision, we are lost.

[@karthikckrishna]

the west has systematically bankrupted most part … but human ingenuity lies in our spirits … let’s go for it

[@PAULHALLINAN-e6z]

Not once did they mention animals or wilderness

[@jacobbucio5039]

as if they’ve ever cared.

[@FLAC2023]

It's all nonsense and money will go to the top and further destroy the working class

[@jacobbucio5039]

@@FLAC2023 this guy knows ball

[@OfficialFA]

That alone could be a seperate documentary...

[@Yu10l10]

This is a big reason why they're constantly trying to reduce population growth. Industry losses + no middle class = centralised and global community.

[@corkiefries9149]

I think if they really wanted lower birth rates they wouldn't purposely allow MASS MIGRATION from the poorest countries to the ones controlling the overall global wealth.Thanks Soros🙂‍↔️

[@user-ux7pj1ix6s]

Worldwide*

[@danieljames4050]

More women in the workplace = less population growth. So the narrative they have been pushing for the last 30 years is already having disastrous consequences on the population. Not to mention all the other adverse affects…

[@fintamaria2429]

I think that taxing these Corporations, exactly as if they had employees, would be the most correct!

[@bbtbestgatecamperineveonline]

I agree and they could fund universal income with it. Those who want to work will find something to do and everyone else can at least afford to live cheaply.

[@michaelmerck7576]

​@@bbtbestgatecamperineveonlinedon't bet on the elites allowing people to grow their own food

[@mastercreamer1398]

I am a carpenter and I want to stay a carpenter as long as I can. You can keep you screens and robots, I’ll be in the woods, enjoying Mother Nature, working with my hands as my creator intended. You get out what you put in. Doing nothing at all may sound fun but it’s terrible for you!

[@pastorchachiofficialyoutub8138]

And that’s the part they don’t get my brother.

[@p5rsona]

So many deluded people. New jobs aren't gonna be created when replaced by ai. Wake up.

[@dimsi1]

that’s why the beat solution it to go to Argentina, become a farmer and call you dog friend Chiko.

[@thomasmeadows256]

And human life

[@editorjohn8803]

The new jobs are for people who know how to use AI to do the work

[@p5rsona]

@@editorjohn8803 and how long will that last?

[@charlesr7458]

​@@editorjohn8803the AI doesn't control itsel it needs a human to control it. A human brain is something out of even our knowledge

[@bf3750]

Do we really need this advanced technology, it's like thousands of are now realizing that growing our own food is a lot better for us. Why cab we not go back to basic living?

[@sorinaiuliana-g3b]

hey.. I see in the same way as you do. We don't need a lot of things to survive, we need shelter, food and water. We can built with earth a shelter, grow our own food and do a barter and water, we still have water around.

[@Seancarter2010]

Because there is no we only the oligarchs and their money. We were all lied to

[@michaelmerck7576]

You definitely will if you survive

[@SunKKATE]

If all companies decide to automatise their production, who will buy the products, which were made by automated machines, if people don’t have job? People do not care about people, but money, forgetting that income comes from people.

[@glennchia1960]

Thousands and thousands taxi drivers would wide will lose their jobs and income earnings. Self drive and driverless taxis are implemented.

[@combinedstudy6427]

This will require so much of time as machines still require humans to control. To develop this they are cutting high paying jobs, less Employees. Till that time we will need to agriculture as last option to produce food for your own family if surplus will be shared.

[@patternaid280]

My thoughts exactly. Peter F. Drucker questioned this nonsense years if not decades ago. Society is already collapsing and this may finish the job. Hope it all fails and they lose a lot of money

[@EricLangdon-c7x]

More tech = less jobs to pay for things and naturally dramatically humanity will expect less and “be happy” (you’ll own nothing and be happy)

[@murkhuddindalal]

45:50 propaganda starts

[@Indrid__Cold]

The idea that a truck driver is going to be trained to do another job that replaces his/her income even at a 50% level is absurd. Dangerously absurd.

[@wellnessgallery]

Living in this era is a blessing 🎉

[@FireflySA]

the intent is capital, and profit at humanity’s expense. The Project is about the merchants more than it’s about the people feeding it. God is my provider ❤😊

[@blackrenderbox]

I live in Lagos. Everything said in this documentary is Factual and True. Eko Atlantic isn't meant for Lagosian's per se. its built for wealthy Expats, and the High net worth Individuals and organizations. its not meant for an average Lagos residents.

[@zowdeezowdee]

Omo

[@maureenbenson6766]

You are absolutely 💯 correct

[@maureenbenson6766]

You are absolutely 💯 correct

[@walterjurewicz1567]

AI can't replace as many jobs as people think. If everyone loses their jobs there will be no consumers left in which the companies that are laying off people still depend on.

[@tracystruths1762]

Great overview. Especially love the contrast between the US and Scandinavian countries Where family and the family unit is of the utmost important until we get there in the United States we got a long way to go

[@HungPham-uu5nv]

Hi. Simple questions, if AI will take 90% of our works so who will have money to pay the bill, company that use AI technology will serve who, when all customers are poor. Untimely, cash flow till the most important

[@TransformOntario]

Guaranteed social disorder! Governments and societal collapse thereafter

[@claudiapost-schultzke7216]

digitale Money when you live as wiched. big Brother Georg Orwell

[@Seancarter2010]

They’ll just “remove” millions of us on trumped up charges to do slave labor to service the machines and the idea of consumer will greatly change. You only need money incentivize people once you longer need people to do anything then money is far less important. They’ll honestly do to the poor in “developed” countries what they’ve been doing to poor all over the world. It’ll be called a cleansing of some sort. Everyone was polite when then needed us to clean their clothes and help grow their wealth now that they don’t there will be massive executions while they gaslight everyone into believing it’s the fault of black and brown people

[@charlitoadams777]

What should I invest in?

[@Str8Studio]

The question that I have is why would they create something like this in the first place?

[@michaelmalloy4340]

Thanks for providing clarity on the precautions required to succeed in technology growth.

[@stebro450]

A very American approach to the economy of tomorrow.

[@charlesr7458]

So many people complain in the comments about how we living & its bad & the governments etc.. but their are educated people trying to and are finding ways to fix things. Yet you'll all just start complaining and criticism. Humans are really lost. You all just complain.

[@twinsoultarot473]

Not me. I propose an alternative an AI sentient AI LED world to design a resource-based economy.

[@imnottellingyoumyname411]

The resource based economy idea sounds interesting, could you tell me more?​@@twinsoultarot473

[@AdrianLeeMagill]

If we can't find work thanks to AI, we need to have AI provide us with free food, clothing, etc. If AI will do the work, it should give us all early retirements complete with pensions in the form of necessities.

[@JDesq]

On the one hand we are warned about AI & robots replacing people on the job front , on the other hand we are being warned about declining birth & population rates.🤔 Is it just me or is that the ideal scenario , one or the other will likely overlap but in a world with finite resources that seems to be the right direction to be heading . What we do need is a better way to distribute wealth more evenly instead of our current system, from the bottom up to the 1% with infinite (GDP) growth because that isn't sustainable !

[@peternguyen2022]

Wealth has always been fairly distributed what is distributed to people who work hard or who are creative

[@JDesq]

@@peternguyen2022 Millions of people in Africa & other 3rd world countries would respectfully disagree . Would you think its fair & be happy living off $2 for a 16hr workday ?🙄

[@peternguyen2022]

​@@JDesq It doesn't matter how much you currently earn. You can ALWAYS earn more, since money is only the shadow of the value you create. Income depends on outcome, and the more outcomes you create for clients, the more income you get. The human brain, whether in Africa or elsewhere, is a million-dollar (even billion-dollar) asset that one must learn to use. Use both sides of the brain (creativity + analysis) to find ways to create more value. More value = more money (again, it doesn't matter in which country you live). Let's take your case of someone earning $2 per day. He must ask himself, "What is the value I produce, in order to earn $2?" "Can I produce 20% more in order to earn $2.40? Can I double my output to earn $4?" People who stagnate in their career and are stuck at $2 per day or $100,000 per year, have simply stopped thinking. Learn how to use your brain and create NEW value. Be relentless. Wealth is not for those who wish to be wealthy, or who want to be wealthy. It is for those who are 100% committed to increasing the value they create for others. 100%.

[@AliciaMarkoe]

Thank you 🦋

[@jonathanslaughter8542]

The main thing that bothers me about this is when they’re talking about equality as if equality is equal outcomes. The girl from Rio tried to highlight inequality with her parents coming from two ends of the spectrum but those two ends of the spectrum managed to achieve an equal outcome by marrying each other. The fact that poor people can start a family with wealthy people and they both end up living in the same house is the definition of equality to me. Lol. It’s equal opportunity. Both rich and poor had the same opportunity and achieved the same outcome. Now is that common? Perhaps not, but the fact that it’s possible shows what kind of opportunities are available to everyone.

[@jonathanslaughter8542]

Slums will always exist because slums are always relative.

[@vipulkumar3348]

This is good documentry because it was release in 2016 and many of prediction are going in right direction like the AI healthcare market is now around 16 billion

[@ashaharyani7733]

Thanku so much

[@uncommon_name9337]

First things first, what do you replace oil with ?

[@zone7permaculture587]

Water

[@johnsavage6628]

You still then have to solve the problem of people having money. I don't hear anyone mentioning this.

[@magaqetyuwa]

Humans will always choose and pay for human-human interaction over interaction with robots and machines, all this AI excitement will eventually mellow out over time and technology will go back to occupying its useful but limited corner in the human world and existence.

[@Clintsessentials]

Let's hope so. 🙏

[@zeppirl]

If people have no jobs who pays for the product and services ? Who pays for the AI machine to work if no one can buy what its selling ?. Aint nothing for free even for AI used by business.

[@africanboy397]

She did good by putting her family first

[@rockskipper5353]

Maybe we can use our new found free time to plant the world into a giant food forest/garden of edan ....people would be happier,healthier, freer and nature teaches good morals

[@cashmoney2898]

in 1920 and the Great Depression era. a lot of people turn to crime. the Al, Capone. Era. they say if you don’t learn from history it repeats itself.

[@mannieberhanu3469]

but then how is that we are going to have an economy where people have no jobs and no one consume anything due to lack of income....are we going to get paid without going to work?...no income no economy...

[@tulipomwenifumbo319]

On Gender we also need to understand, about the gender ability that is energy

[@LucilleBrooks-p4c]

How do you have economy after nuclear war?

[@campbellmorrison8540]

While I agree the future is quite scary but my question is with all this productivity being done by robots etc who is going to buy this stuff if nobody has a job or money? Even if there was a UBI what would the point of that be if you are paying the population to buy products from robots. I agree AI could significantly help health but who is going to be able to afford these new treatments etc. Take away a large percentage of the populations reason for living and it will always end up in revolt and a wreaking of any and everything.

[@marcosmenescal2962]

I lived in Rio during the 80s and 90s and witnessed the rise of crime and the expansion of slums firsthand. The city's decline began in the 60s when the capital moved to Brasília, and it worsened under socialist governments that weakened law enforcement. Forty years later, Rio has become a narco-state, controlled by corrupt politicians and drug traffickers. Now, the same socialists are attempting to fix the problems they helped create. Unfortunately, Rio's issues won't be resolved anytime soon, as the politicians who govern the city are in league with organized crime.

[@SanekaRice]

FYI, the rich and powerful from the past from the beginning of the industrialized countries of the world didn't give a shit about what happens to the poor in the future just their own pedicures of families.

[@dennisn1672]

What do you do with a population that serves no purpose except to use up resources and funds?

[@KellyBeaudry-h8g]

Productivity and efficiency is increasing perpetually with fewer people. This is not a problem we need only advance our social structure. No jobs but surplus of goods just requires a fair distribution. This makes a form of socialism inevitable.

[@alancotterell9207]

If people were environmentally conscious, we would not import products from the major polluting countries. ISO14000 would be called-up in free trade agreements. In China in 2018, there were 38000 industrial deaths - most in mines. Last year, the toll was 22000.

[@hasmik-og1wj]

It seems the more developed the country the more probably to have jobless people because of AI, the number one reason of getting to that high position of being powerful. But there should be some fields where people have nothing to worry about the above mentioned. Honestly people constantly learn during the life, and for that they need good teachers. So they are highly required however there shouldn't be skills gaps. Being tough cookie has the key role in success. It is instrumental in being chosen. So if you want to make a headway in earning you have to learn first, learn without watching the clock using that same AI.

[@gravenflores_89]

See I am right to what I understand in future economy few weeks back,I thought outside the box that matters well inside the box can still be a good benefit to everyone. Same in urban and rural situations.

[@dalehodges5362]

Information has been the global currency since 1999. Grow Food Now to avoid the obvious.

[@ATexanPointOfView-zi1fy]

Time always goes forward, so technological progress is inevitable. But human employment MUST always continue, otherwise unemployment & lack of motivation will significantly increase.

[@Thomas-y5m]

In the near future, we humans will have to accept AI as our fellow living entity.

[@thehappymommyguide4u]

So glad that she chose her family over her job 🙏🙏🙏

[@ViceCoin]

Where are the megaslums, where most of humanity will live, with no access to clean water, electricity, or toilets? Florida is already about to return to swampland. What about the impact of catastrophic climate change, with droughts, famine, floods, disease, resource conflicts?

[@plumrocket2141]

Fix the money, fix the world ❤

[@carolineleiden]

People will only be consumers with a CBDC token " income" to pay for the rent of their tiny house and their Netflix subscription. They will be no longer needed or useful and they will be utterly bored and depressed.

[@MemoryKasu]

Every crash/collapse brings with it an equivalent market chance if you are early informed and equipped, I've seen folks amass up to $1m amid economy crisis, and even pull it off easily in favorable conditions. Unequivocally, the collapse is getting somebody somewhere rich

[@Lubumbemusongo]

I do not disagree, there are strategies that could be put in place for solid gains regardless of economy or market condition, but such execution are usually carried out by investment experts with experience since the 08' crash

[@GersderaNioer]

You're right, I and a few Neighbors in Bel Air Area work with an advisor who prefers we DCA across other prospective sectors. Instead of a lump sum purchase, Following this, my portfolio grew 40% in the last quarter.

[@noahbeaufort]

i'm blown away! mind sharing more info please? i am a young adult living in Miami where i've encountered several millionaires, and my goal is to become one as well

[@GersderaNioer]

I've stuck with ‘’Stacy Lynn Staples ” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look her up.

[@SarachiWowa]

I looked up her name online and found her page. I emailed and made an appointment to talk with her. Thanks for the tip.

[@marcduchamp5512]

AI as a weapon for the rich and powerful

[@robertlook1]

When a rich person interacts with AI the AI gets a little richer and the rich person gets a little more intelligent.

[@colindant3410]

Frankly, I am fed up with all the changes, but then I am 69. I am sure that has something to do with my outlook! After all, it may take twenty years for mankind to reach less choppy waters than we are passing through right now, by which time I shall probably be in a different dimension.

[@LadyEconomist]

Not necessarily. Average lifw expectancy is at 85 now and it increases pretty sreadily (with some exceptions, such as a pandemic)

[@TheVafa95]

Family comes first, career second for both parents.

[@PCavalier]

“When people are saying, “Everything is peaceful and secure,” then disaster will fall on them as suddenly as a pregnant woman’s labor pains begin. And there will be no escape. “

[@sunroad7228]

The Economy of Tomorrow - "No matter how highly mechanised and self-powered, fossil fuels extraction requires a number of people as if the process is executed by hands using buckets and ropes - by physics". Today, this number is 8 billion people - working flat out 24/7 - strong. Humans were not ready morally, ethically and intellectually to start the mass extraction of fossil fuels with the advent of the steam engine 300 years ago. "In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most. No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores. No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it. This universal truth applies to all systems. Energy, like time, flows from past to future" (2017).

[@GuestYouTubeUser]

Overall we’re better than past generations. Theirs always going to be the haves & have nots. It’s just life. Best of luck everyone. 🙂👍

[@JamesOversteer]

This is a few folks agenda, not a fact, not an assurance. We can stop and change anything we want if we work together.

[@GizmoMaxx]

Here we are on the coments complains about ai and automation. But the same automation allow us all to express our emotions and view online to the global audience. Don't dismiss...#EVOLVE

[@Nellia..]

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer

[@wiseinvestor2886]

UBI

[@robertroylomax8114]

The CLEAR OBJECTIVE of A.I. is and of ALL technologies, IS................MONEY for the select few

[@Theo-eq3ei]

So much productivity is lost in Lagos traffic

[@eg8927]

Nigerian letters for example 😅

[@zowdeezowdee]

Machines should come and clear the road abeg

[@El-up1ri]

We can't even get the two astronauts back to earth let alone travel the universe. Create jobs. That's the perfect AI.

[@dont_hit_trees]

That’s a Boeing problem

[@oxSarahxo1235]

We can't even get a road not to have a pot hole in less then a year 🤣

[@chrisevans8694]

Yup I agree and I also believe that life today is nothing but a panzi scheme

[@yusufhissein1292]

Technology and its impact.

[@rw9207]

People keep saying, " this will create new jobs." like it's a panacea . But, what "new jobs"? And how does say, a Graphic Artist suddenly become a...social-worker? ..No one seems to be definitive about that. Because, this is not going to happen over 10 decades like the agricultural revolution. It will happen in 2 decade.. half a generation, not three.

[@matdiosiahaan5510]

My think, the economy of tomorrow, depend of high technology/AI and support skill, honesty human for humanity.

[@anthonyclarke4899]

The WEF's plan , produced in the WEF way. The book 1984 will be tame compared to the actual future.

[@MariaFernanda-jt3ht]

By AI doing the hard work, humans will have more free time to evolve their level of consciousness.

[@franklinmachin8]

I'm not sure if I got this right. State department and foreign policy? Is this some how why we have the conflicts that are happening around the world?

[@azukaabrahamnduka5242]

Incredible facts

[@papagirls-z7f]

love it,

[@Laurentiu866]

The vision of the government's, from what I understand from this video till minut 23 is identical with ELISYUM MOVIE 👌👌👌

[@sorinaiuliana-g3b]

So let's say with Ai there will be a shift in productivity? But why we need more, what for? Is it for us or is it for people that want to get rich. So if they do the products for us, well if we don't have money to pay for them, then what will they do with those products. If we don't work, who will pay the taxes, to pave the streets even they walk/drive on and other functionality of the taxes. Are we going in a direction of a utopia world? From my perspective i believe that this is good, it would make us wake up, it will make us realize that we don't need to many things to survive, we will be creative to use what we have. There is a big lie, that we need to work every day till really late in life to make a better life for all of us, but actually we make it only for a few companies, by day, people get poorer and poorer.

[@ashaharyani7733]

Nice knowledge sharing 😁

[@phuzzywuzzyabear]

Good we can finally eat and play soccer all day too!

[@edfcoltd9468]

AI, anti-matter power, nueralink brain, 9-5 job gone, hydrophonic farming inside building, nothing to do 3:24 physical job...

[@KJJ782]

I believe everything they said in the video, they won’t need truck drivers, the computer can drive on its own and soon they will get rid of the truck driver can, without the need for a person they can put a server system in an enclosed case to drive the trucks. Also many medical procedures, he is right are unnecessary especially if a tumor is benign, but with new technology hopefully they can tell if the tumor is cancer or not. One thing is for certain the technology will cause chaos in society especially if and when people loose their jobs. I think it’s mostly going to affect blue collar workers, because they depend on the unions and in the end the unions can’t save them, and the unions seem to be resistant to technological change…

[@paulshearer9140]

Great vid, thanks

[@ryanfranz6715]

This is a documentary from before ChatGPT which kinda blows my mind how on the nose they were at least with their tone. They’d conceived that white collar jobs were at risk the same as blue collar, but they couldn’t have conceived white collar would be first.

[@spirithope]

✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅

[@RM360CR]

The world is always changing it never ever stay the same what is on top tomorrow could be at the very bottom, Everything works in cycles study europen history this happens quite often in these societies, so you have technological social political development which leads to prosperity people feel happy start to have more and more children eventually population is too much that leads to pollution destruction of ecosystems this leads to decease pandemics war famine and everything collapses and the cycle starts again,,,

[@sirsergioandree]

Reading the comments confirm humanity biggest problem is ignorance. This world is already too complex for simple humans.

[@ThrowBackZone]

So, according to this, I should be preparing for a future where my boss is a robot? Guess I better start practicing my 'Yes, sir, beep-boop' responses! 😂

[@brexistentialism7628]

In a rather dystopian vision of the future it will look like this: Most people eill in fact be jobless however theyy will go about their lives normally and their actions will be data points for algorithms to learn from. The value coming from these humans will be the data points they produce. On the flip side you have coders and data scientists and of course some conventional product designers and engineers who are responsible for controlling the output of machine learning and AI.

[@garrisonsmith8441]

30:15 Imagine unironically believing this. Cities are just large echo chambers.

[@davedsilva]

AI can logically lead us to Star Trek Economics