Book of Mormon Authorship w/ Dan Vogel Pt. 2 | Ep. 1067

[@kentthalman4459]

So cool to have Dan come back and provide more context. I'm going through Dan's book right now and find it fascinating. I'm sure Signature Book has experienced a spike in accessing Dan's writings.

[@kamilziemian995]

I learn so much about Mormonism from this discussions.

[@johns1834]

Is that good or bad?

[@kamilziemian995]

@@johns1834 Very good.

[@johns1834]

@@kamilziemian995 By very good, do you mean mormon teaching is very good or questioning and learning how false mormon teaching is very good?

[@kamilziemian995]

@@johns1834 I mean that knowing more about Mormonism and its origin is very good thing. And as a result, my opinion is that Mormonism is blatantly false doctrine.

[@johns1834]

@@kamilziemian995 Good to know, I totally agree with you. I search for ways to encourage my mormon friends and family to give serious thought about being mormon. But the mormon church tells it's members to NOT ask questions because they might learn the truth. Unfortunately, most will never watch this series.

[@paulfanberg3071]

Could you publish a Time log of different topics that you and Dan have talked about. There are so many hours to go back and try to find a specific topic. And pacifically looking when was the introduced the magic underwear and what he would have to say about that.

[@mormonstories]

Our website at MormonStories.org has all of our interviews divided into blog posts with descriptions about the content of each: www.mormonstories.org/episodes/

[@throcmorton]

Read The Spalding Enigma: Who Wrote the Book of Mormon

[@romanstarr01]

Excellent analysis oñ the process of origination to the b.of.m; the ability to logically piece the evelutionary dynamics is remarkable. I often wonder if JS ever brought anyone into his confidence and bounce ideas to the editorial sequencing of the scriptural events to lay support for the idea of authentications and consistency - Rigdon or Cowdery maybe, while swearing them to secrecy; nod & wink ...type thing. But this also lays the fundamental foundation to the rest of Mormon church history, which is a foundation of conspiratorial fabrication to fit a religion as an evelutionary process; making the necessary changes from fact to fiction and / or a collusion of deceit. Very good presentation, I know I'm late to this but this has answered many of my questions.

[@johns1834]

Cowdery was Joseph Smith 2nd cousin by Smith's mother, so it's hard to believe they never met before 1829. Cowdery was a teacher, lawyer, justice of the peace and apparently well educated. Maybe he actually wrote large parts of the BOM.

[@johns1834]

When properly interpreted, there is NO controversy in the Bible. It seems like J Smith had plenty of time to wander off and practice what he wanted to say when looking into the hat. Mormons, to this day, desecrate Jesus after every Sunday service, when the left over 'blessed and sanctified' bread and water is thrown in the trash.

[@tcnayskereved]

DV is the ultimate Blind Guide! No articulation and no Spirit! No ability to persuade. In short boooring!!!

[@seancasey7090]

Content! Dan is anything but dull.

[@bonnygu3]

Wow! Did we watch the same interview? He is so well spoken and humble. He doesn’t need to persuade when he’s speaking truth.

[@DougVandegrift]

Dan is one of these most insightful guy. He’s done more history on early Mormonism than most Mormon historians