The Case that Triggered an Emergency (Part 1)

[@meetan-]

I am 72.. I knew this case then when it was happening..But only after watching this video I understood fully and clearly.. thanks

[@manjunathswamy2270]

Parthasarathy TOTADRI NATHAN Sir, you were part of history and are sharing your perspective only. That's all. Today the generation don't want to know what is happening in our country.

[@Superbandfly]

Now we know about paid media why the case was not explained to general population - social media is the killer of fake news.

[@cassino9399]

Parthasarathy TOTADRI NATHAN u look 27 😎

[@txlish]

Well I am 59 and I knew things 're not right. And I was personally affected by It - Her cops came to my school after my 10th grade one subject qualifying exam to interrogate m. For what? Becos I used to spend an hour in the evening of otherwise hectic school schedule - for a breather in the park. WTF - How did they knew it that I attended a summer camp for a week just to have good time - play khokho and kabaddi

[@magnified4827]

Demo-cracy is only a mask and behind that mask hides Demons.

[@achillesdumbeldore]

"The Prime Minister of India brought down by a bunch of Mavericks using nothing but the legal system"! Wow! That would make one hell of a movie tag.

[@boostingmotivation]

This proves no matter how fascist a government becomes, judiciary is always present to safeguard our country from misfortunes. Proud of Indian judicial system, one of the best in the world. Proud to be Indian 🇮🇳

[@parameahwarbt4920]

But indian judiciary except then Judge sri HR khanna then upheld the emergency 75! HR khanna only judge upheld the fundamental rights of people. "Others"incl father of present CJI supported emergency!??! Pl clarify!?

[@SubhamBhattacharya-zp7ie]

But judiciary failed during the emergency

[@Peachsaysart]

this video is a gold mine ! thank you so much for posting this.

[@aatreysrivastava3174]

The video is informative but Prashant bhushan's creditibility is what is making me go through other sources to recheck.

[@AB-vd7ux]

Prashant bhushan is a urban naxal

[@Videocentric2010]

Very well put together! Sheds light on an issue overlooked in the media. Thanks for your efforts. We look forward to more such hallmark cases directing the course of Indian history!

[@saisujan770]

Eye opener, to hear that Congress has an election symbol with a cow and calf.

[@Swamy189]

Congress was first rashtriyawad party with close association with rss which moved off later period

[@wanderingpanchhi]

Great footage. Where the hell did you get the access to this gold? Also, very well made video. Keep it up. :)

[@abhishekkrishna3902]

Indian media archives

[@sabahhusain1096]

Put the speed to 1.5x thank me later

[@NitiRawat]

Thank you so much for putting it out so well, instead of unnecessary dramatization of events which impacted Indian politics to great extents

[@shaikibrahim7895]

Awesome narration and documentary. From long time I was looking for complete emergency documentary Finally got it

[@mrlastsurvivor6124]

We, The People are the Masters of OUR Own Destiny.

[@nag7432]

Awesome story telling. I wish i had a history teacher like you .

[@sujitbidve9791]

I am happy to see how strong our judiciary system used to be and how people took them seriously. Nowadays for the first time, our topmost 4 judges of SC came out and says our democracy is in danger but nobody takes them seriously. History is going to repeat itself. Not in the same way but it will.

[@Karthikeyan-de8xp]

There are thousands of cases pending in SC and these have time for silly PILs. Do these actually deserve to be 'believed' when they utter prophecies? Unless they tell the specifics, they cannot be taken seriously. Unfortunately, such is the image of SC now.

[@magnified4827]

One of the greatest follies in India is the large public sychophancy to famous personalities... I think that will never go away that is because its a part and parcel of the religious cultural mores of this country.

[@chinnu0075]

Buy and read THE CASE THAT SHOOK INDIA by Prashant Bhushan! True masterpiece! I literally had goosebumps at some chapters!

[@mrgamerboy8316]

This documentary makes me proud of OUR DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF LAW

[@manoharprasadshah966]

Make a video on Kesavananda Bharti case as well. Please.

[@ArjunPrasadZ007]

I was expecting that case as main reason.

[@dewesh28]

Manohar Prasad Shah This work deserves appreciaton. People still need to know the truth. Peasant Bhushan ji has done a remarkable job❤️

[@AryanRaj-ce5pe]

Interestingly Keshavananda Ji lost that case but still became a hero.

[@vigneshsekar5993]

The case which saved the Constitution itself 😍

[@dhananjaybhatt54]

and same Prashant Bhusan now opposing EVM and favoring paper voting where ballot boxes were manipulated by goons from all political parties.

[@indianetizen]

Dhananjay Bhatt ..because there are more evil minds at the helm than ever before..and paper is atleast tangible.

[@anilkarad3648]

indianetizen And was Indira Gandhi more saintly?haha

[@indianetizen]

Akshay Kumar no, never meant to state that she was any Saint, but those at the centre now are pure evil

[@madhvsuryach7199]

unlike Ghandhees , this govt allowed a technical upgrade that after voting u get a slip like our simple ATM transaction. Which is good. Happy modi govt worked out a solution. Thumbs up to that open mind. (Unlike our jagirdhari Congress)

[@beinghuman9737]

@Shantha kumar Who give power to give certify other on national and anti-national . Are you feku Modi bhakt? If so then I am sorry otherwise you don't have that authority....

[@justicedoesntexist1919]

Pure and sheer talent. Lawyers are incredibly smart and shrewd people

[@anikad1989]

Drop the background music!

[@gtoor3798]

Fascinating stuff, I am writing a biography about miss Gandhi and found this video to be a valuable resource. Great work, and thank you.

[@kumaratul609]

Art of Cross examination.. Was forte of shanti bhushan

[@AB-vd7ux]

Watching this video again on the 45th anniversary of the Emergency (2020)

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Excellent Film.

[@amarendranath2954]

Never knew this case. Thank you for recommending this and appreciate the subscriber

[@Nivetha-]

We want lawyers like this for our nation's development

[@Z_Trades]

Well i am amazed how misuse of public officials by Indra G got her. Thanks for making this video i will share it with folks on my side to educate them btw misuse of public officials is quite common in Pakistan. Thanks from my father as well. Keep up the good work.

[@muraliam7224]

Very good keep it in looking forward for the next video

[@vijay2815]

Thanks for this video analysis. Needed this information. :) Rise India , Rise Indians

[@Bhadrudu]

On the June 12th, 1975 India held its head high in the international arena that it is a democratic nation with independent Judiciary. Bu the same thing cannot be said today, unfortunately.

[@mohankumark8717]

We have Michael d cunha who gave the right verdict in Jayalalitha's (Incumbent CM)disproportionate. Asset case. Dont worry...still we have such jusdges.

[@therealb888]

After Jaya's death? Ya shame on supreme court.

[@anmoljoshi557]

@veerabhadra rao , did it though? , I mean keeping aside the emergency, the SC held her election valid and reversed Sinha J. 's judgment.

[@damodarmangueshkar200]

Thanks for sharing vedio.

[@AtulSingh-rm2jg]

India rose to freedom at midnight and was quickly put to sleep by a family even before the morning of its joyous freedom was over...we are only just waking up.

[@CommonCanc]

Ya we were them modi chokeslammed us resulting india fainting

[@AtulSingh-rm2jg]

@@CommonCanc modi came in 2014, before that we were a picture of ideal,honest democracy with super rich society, strong international reputation and protected borders...and how did modi choke anybody? By winning an fair election. A few Congressis fainted on the results day, I know.

[@CommonCanc]

@@AtulSingh-rm2jg the economy was going well we were supposed to over take China in terms of G.D.P , the deal with france was cheap then demotization happened

[@AtulSingh-rm2jg]

@@CommonCanc economy is no more a predictable phenomenon, markets were opened in 1990 without any failsafe mechanisms, under pressure from IMF, worldbank etc. The rich colluded with MNCs to stash money abroad thus Swiss bank accounts... a strong domestic market,which had saved india till now, didn't reflect in national wealth, a few sat over millions in cash, plain simple dead cash, zero investments... what else was the need for demonetisation...

[@CommonCanc]

@@AtulSingh-rm2jg i am sure that led to the need of demitization but there were other ways to stop that you seizing money from every one while most of the black money was never returned it was converted to gold ,estate, goods . It shook the government so much that as a result they inscreased the fule prices due to which the economy was able to function what else would make your oil prices high when the world is at low, during the oil crisis during U.P.A goverment our prices were stable while the world was not what will you say bout the inflamation of currency

[@topnotchindian]

Thanks for sharing this info, sheds light on the issue precisely

[@WeekendVibesTelugu]

This video is indeed a gem

[@funguy29]

Kudos on the high quality footage.

[@dewesh28]

It was the effort of Shanti Bhushan ji who made. Sri Raj Narayan won. He created critical situation for Indira ji by cross quationing But it also shows the impartiality and. determination. Of judiciary. Who acted. Free from every adverse Efforts or circumstances Shanti Bhushan deserves best for all. the. Happenings He was genius acted smart at every point and left no stone unturned to. Win. Raj Narayan❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@shimvijay1]

Thanks for posting this video. Though I am not in the legal field, I enjoyed watching the video.

[@abhiraminair34]

Brilliant explanation... Thank you for the efforts 👍

[@naturalgamerplaynaturaly]

now I understood why congress wants ballet papper back to make chemical loccha

[@ameyas7726]

We use paper ballet in Russia all the time comrade...nothing to fear, we elect best leader every single time..

[@notyourbruh]

@@ameyas7726 We😀

[@rakeshkotianr]

@@ameyas7726 do you mean same leader every single time

[@mrs.niludas8941]

@Abhi KsP absolutely..bhai pls watch Brigitte gabriel videos as well,aur bhi pata chalega tumhey ye log kaisey hotey hai

[@skullyreckile2227]

@Abhi KsP still India is a developing country.. Still Indian people shit on Ganga river that they worship too😂

[@Nehulo55]

Good video. We need more content like this

[@paulsingh7835]

Sayid Naveed I can only wish that you never have to get stuck in Indian Courts in Delhi. I am fighting one case for 11 years and after having a decree from Delhi High court I been told it could take 4-5 years to execute degree. Delhi courts are worst then even African countries. God save every one from Delhi Courts.

[@AdityaAserkar]

Power of democracy. Amazing! But then there's part 2.

[@mr.anindyabanerjee8373]

Shanti Bhushan complied to Raj Narain's eccentricity which precipitated the abysmal crisis. It was a v.difficult time when India was reeling under economic crisis, threat from Pakistan, refugee crisis, global financial & oil crisis. At that time these fellows wanted to dethrone Indira Gandhi through unconstitutional & undemocratic means. Emergency proved clearly that a Prime Minister's position in such a critical condition cannot be overthrown or debarred. This is to be understood very clearly without any doubt.

[@Sps27]

Really nice and well put documentary!!!

[@shivamindore3470]

i respect her for 1971 war but Emergency can't be justified, it was truly the darkest period of Independent India, eve after that congress imposed President rule over many states of India from time to time , without strong reason, but at present BJP is ensuring democratic values by not imposing President rule in Bengal

[@unitedred1999]

Honestly even though the British rule destroyed India, Congress rule screwed India equally bad in the past 60 yrs. Not a huge fan of Modi but atleast current and former BJP PMs didn't get the job out of nepotism.

[@sadhvipragya4746]

Google how many BJP politicians are beneficiaries of nepotism

[@AB-vd7ux]

Well said Nitesh

[@abircse1990]

Great video. But please cut the stupid background music. The whole story is inherently dramatic, it does not need further dramatization.

[@abircse1990]

@@iflyabus haanji

[@kennethjason7898]

abir chakraborty 😂

[@canbot1]

@@abircse1990 looks like someone has deleted that comment

[@Ajay-vh4zq]

tum pani ko pita hai ya pani ko khata hai?

[@canbot1]

@@Ajay-vh4zq kaun? Pani ko koi nahi khata if you were actually serious

[@venkataramansubramanian9288]

In India "The Emergency of 1975" refers to a 21 month period in 1975 - 1977 when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi unilaterally had a State of emergency declared across the country officially issued by President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed under Article 352(1) of the constitution for 'Internal disturbance', the emergency was in effect from 25 June 1975 until its withdrawal on 21 March 1977. The order bestowed upon the Prime Minister the authority to rule by decree, allowing elections to be suspended and civil liberties to be curbed for much of the emergency, most of Gandhi's political opponents were imprisoned and the press was censored. Several other atrocities were reported from the time , including a forced mass-sterilization campaign spearheaded by Sanjay Gandhi, the Prime Ministers' son. The Emergency is one of the most controversial periods of independent India's history.

[@naveenthomas8296]

Thanks for this video. Its very helpful.

[@vizd9477]

Ignore what other have said about the music. You have done a GOOD job. #KeepItUp

[@saileshmalhotra3490]

The worst part is the country's law and order is so paralyzed that it cannot book these people......

[@hmpriteshraj5462]

Thank you for sharing this video

[@ashk5013]

The background music dilutes and takes away the attention from such a informative video. Hope the seriousness of the topic remains as primary importance and you edit / delete the background score. Thanks 😊

[@crypticTV]

2:30 case 4:10 4:30 5:15 Using the government "cow and calf" 6:50 Kapoor 8:50 Indira Ghandhi 9:30 Blue book 11:13 Nixon 11:55 Caught the liar 14:40 When did she declare Feb 1st 16:30 written 17:45 caught lying on oath 18:40 19:40 20:15

[@kedarbahulkar189]

" She lied on oath "

[@ritadas1065]

Indira Gandhi real name MAMOONA Begum she lied constitution india indians Bogus family

[@alwayscuriousbutsad6584]

it is so interesting i can watch a long movie on this. i came to know about this now

[@kishoremacherla3628]

What is the name of this case???

[@BharathiFromSouth]

Still now young Indian don't no this. It's has to be known for every Indian. It should be make movie and distributed to all India.

[@madhulikamahindrakar4469]

Thank you for the information,

[@ApoorvSri]

Hon'ble Mr Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha Sir was a stalwart of Indian Judiciary 🇮🇳 He always gave heed for protecting people's fundamental rights He had the guts to show Dictator Indra Gandhi that you're not the only supreme authority and you can't infringe the rights of citizens. After this decision he was never promoted , the Congress made him suffer The Hypocrite Congress.

[@tarantulatarantula3879]

I was a kid in 1975 & remember the heard about the terror of Emergency from seniors. After 43 years when I see this video, it seems to me- (1) What was the role of Election Commission of India in the whole episode? An 'electoral malpractice' is primarily a prerogative of the ECI. Was it a party in the Allahabad HC? What was their say ? Why these Rajnarain & others did not draw the attention of the ECI during the occurrence of the said malpractices immediately and waited till the results were out? Doesn't it expose their 'crooked intentions' of 'Entering the Parliament thru the back-door'? (2)The ground on which the election of Indira Gandhi was declared invalid were mere 'Flimsy legal technicalities' and the actual 'Peoples mandate' of Raibereli was subverted. It is 'most improbable' that the insignificant 'electoral malpractices' committed by IG had earned her a margin of more than a hundred thousands! Even without those, she would have won it hands down. (3) I agree with the Bhushans that it would have been much more magnanimous for IG to stay away from the parliament till the SCI has pronounced its verdict and then, act accordingly. Even If she was ousted as an MP, she could have continued as PM up to 6 months before getting herself elected in a bye-election, as she did later in Chikmagalur or in the Rajya Sabha, and come back with enhanced glory. Emergency was indeed, a bad and suicidal decision putting a black-spot forever in her brilliant career as a PM with so many feathers in her crown e.g. Bangladesh war, Nationalization of banks, Nuclear Power and so many. The State Terrorism unleashed during the Emergency was deplorable. But, I think, Indira G could have spared it, had there not been her blind ego & the malevolent persuasions of her son & her coterie.

[@mohammedlokhandwala8294]

They barred her for 6 years. If this was not the case I am sure she would have stepped down.

[@Superbandfly]

Amazing video - clearly lays down the case and how it was won.

[@jyothinagesan5483]

So many straight forward officers were compulsorily retired overnight...families ruined...among other things

[@AB-vd7ux]

Very true.

[@shaileshrana7165]

Godammit I love the Indian supreme court's balls. Proud to be an Indian.

[@Vedachakra]

Thank you. Now it's clear

[@rakeshkotianr]

Thanks for this video

[@MOGame92]

Why is only one party of the case is keeping their views. Why this video doesn't have any person from Indira's side

[@tarunchoudhury4796]

What a wonderfully created video excellent

[@andyrozario7]

Beautiful Compilation lovely! History's Mysteries! Do we have a documentary on China's aggression!

[@rohitbachhil3216]

Can you please let me know the name of the background music name.

[@mohitkapoor4615]

This dynasty laid foundation of country's misery.

[@AB-vd7ux]

Very truw

[@vy1134]

India was going through a storm created by external forces outside India trying to play with Indian sovereignty and we now know who and why.. Indira Gandhi was a target for many foreign governments due to geopolitics and cold war and the alliance with USSR. She even doubted that military might take over her govt. So emergency from her end was the best solution she had it seems

[@saiprasad1413]

Is the background score from The Caspian Report?

[@indianetizen]

Sai J stock BG

[@arachnid83]

Crossing the chasm Kevin Macleod

[@avs6362]

I am not against Congress, most of the people won't be, but I can't stand Gandhis...

[@Karthikeyan-de8xp]

Any self respecting Indian cannot.

[@sirianthunder279]

They are not true Gandhis in the first place. Indira was a Nehru who married to a Parsi but later changed her last name to Gandhi for political benefit. Shame on her.

[@ajithsdevadiga1603]

@@sirianthunder279 😳😧

[@avs6362]

@riderharry you Know what about these guys... They are scum... 😁

[@blommsnruins01u9]

A questions to those implying something like, everyone has merits and demerits so don't dare accusing her of this and that. How does a person's virtues hinder anyone from discussing their vices? Actions don't cancel out, meaning negative and positive actions are negative and positive on themselves. Even saints can be held accountable for their misdoings at the same time being venerated for their good deeds.

[@sysbys2008]

The Justice of India and the truthful ness of Indira Gandhi... Can you just compare that period with Present Indian Scenario?

[@manthanmugdiya5130]

Which articles of constitution were the emergency challenged? because of this case?

[@Ok-gm7qx]

British behind most assinations.Get sold or grow bold.

[@dreamgoals6248]

But in class 12 NCERT it's written that that she was no more a MP and had to be elected once again within six months !

[@toobalkain]

I never understood why India, with such glorious past and clearly intelligent people, has such huge problems and despite huge progress having been made, remains pretty much a third world country, poor, corrupt, dirty and lacking confidence on the world stage.

[@LavakeshPandey]

why do you guys put so loud background music man? It's so annoying. I can't hear what the lawyers are saying.

[@sidheshpatil7120]

Shanti Bhushan admitted to an unethical conduct on his part! During cross-examination, using a tone that would lead the witness to give evidence in favour of the prosecution/applicant, thereby taking the facts out of the issue being argued upon. Facts that are material and necessary to ensuring justice is rendered. Indira Gandhi might have lied to the court. But Shanti Bhushan also didn't want the truth be told.

[@AB-vd7ux]

Lol. That's the only thing you saw in this video?

[@justicedoesntexist1919]

So the lawyer got the truth out and you considrr it unethical? You have no idea about a court room.

[@uiuxshoaib]

Wow nice explaination

[@yuvjitsingh]

Hats off to ths Brave old man!

[@Nivetha-]

Power of judiciary = wings of freedom of citizens

[@mansiratsandhu2876]

Great explanation👍👍👌👌

[@VishnuMishra01]

Can you also make videos dubbed in Hindi? I wanna share it with a few people but I think English may be a barrier here. All you gotta do is, dubb the complete video along with speeches in Hindi. Will be really great. Thank you.

[@swati8151]

Good work

[@TVTShindi]

Activists are clowns?Go to hell.Do you see how father and son differ on the glory of Raj Narayan Ji?

[@shishirba]

So you are saying clowns cannot be activists? How classist! (sarcasm alert)

[@raghavbatra12345]

sounds like a jealous son to me,trying hard to gain fame

[@user-vo6hj1kj1s]

This is legal channel so they interviewed lawyers. So lawyers are stating legal implications involved in it. This is general practice. If they would have interviewed Raj Narain, interview would have been totally different with general statements and not on legal points.

[@rushabhshah6489]

Informative video...!!

[@tencilenm3052]

Since 1975 the court had give justice by judgment ,if this is the case under trial ,only after the victims death the case would have gone void

[@bongo990]

Good content, but too bad you ripped off CaspianReport's music.

[@peterpaulchimata9916]

Good job. Keep it up.

[@danishzaheer2468]

Why high background music in this documentry ...

[@johnbabu3640]

Only part of the story is being told. That time in India politics there were outside forces fueling the opposition with money and political chaos . We see the same forces in polished way in today’s government

[@muzungchimr3527]

The documentation of this case is very well explained. But i am rationalize to question about the video,because we can certainly assure that those respective lawyers had failed their case so eventually they will address the issues upon Gandhi. I feel this as bias because to conclude the birth of this case both the sides of opinions should be examined.

[@bhagatsingh5019]

Excellent informative video.

[@Dr-ub8ry]

🙏 Bhai, This video will help bharateeyata to survive from being throttled by liberals. Please, help sanatan dharma. Please recirculate again all over social media , as you know the present dangerous situation.

[@finnyforever08]

Sorry guys but this critical part isn't clear" around 13:51 Shanthi Bhushan says that he questioned her in a tone to make it sound the amendment was illegal, asking: ".. was this amendment made with your consent?" If he had made it sound like yes was 'illegal', why would she agree and say yes, it was made with her consent, rather than no. Am I missing something???

[@omaraziz7818]

With that question, Mrs. Gandhi had thought the problem was all about if that amendment was made with the consent of the PMO, and if not, the amendment would turn invalid, proving her guilty of using the state administration machinery for elections. Hence, she said, Yes, it had her consent.

[@finnyforever08]

Yes, but why should Shanthi Bhushan emphasise that he intoned the question in a way that suggested the amendment was illegal, and so corner her into denying she gave consent. That tactic clearly did not seem to register with her, because she admitted she HAD given consent. She scored an own goal due to her own assumptions / ignorance (actually that's on her counsels). Having said that, whether she had said yes or no, the result would be the same: invalidation of her election. Of course 'yes' proved she was guilty of using state machinery for her political ends and that attracted its own penalties ...

[@bassinegi8253]

Omar Aziz

[@truthwar4567]

how can he call him a Clown a person who has spent decades in Jail for other humans causes...how can such a person b a clown?

[@kanishksahu4019]

That old man have some guts 😎

[@KunalSingh-lf4ql]

Excellent, insightful....thanks !

[@gargivyas]

good old days!