Omega Seamaster 300m VS Planet Ocean - Who Wins?!

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

Okay team, this is a close one… who wins?!

[@Csibu89]

Gotto be the Seamaster Diver 300M, all the functionality, sturdiness i would ever need. PO is nice too though, looks too big on paper but it wears like a dream. A heavy dream, but still 😄

[@brownmcpherson5724]

PO

[@bellerophon9116]

If we're talking about the 75th anniversary in summer blue, the Omega 300m wins!

[@tschoy9388]

SeaMaster 300 M win because of size and weight.

[@stefanpersson240]

Nice to see that the majority would choose the PO as I did. I chose it because of three things: the superior 8900 movement, better grip on the bezel and the design.

[@maitrehg]

To me, the PO looks way better.

[@t.j.macpherson7581]

I have the PO. Absolutely love it. I have a 7.25 inch wrist and chose the 39.5 size so it doesn’t feel as chunky.

[@hotrodstu77]

I had a PO 39.5 and it was awesome. Big regret getting rid of it. The sizing of it makes it more available for many wrist sizes. You should have mentioned it!

[@GU5S]

I've the white dial planet ocean with the orange bezel and the lume on this one is insane. The whole bezel is lumed and it lights up like a targeting computer. Don't know why they only did it on this particular colour in the model range, but it's awesome. The SMP 300 has a couple things going for it, but stacked up against the planet ocean its a pretty easy win for the planet ocean, so long as your wrist can wear it.

[@neilmartin7776]

No contest - for me, it's the Planet Ocean all day long. I own one of the second generation ones from 2013, and it's an absolute beast - never misses a beat, feels great and looks great. The latest generation with the micro-adjustment bracelets are even better. Don't get me wrong, the Seamaster 300m is an amazing watch for the price, but i just don't think it matches the PO for specs or presence on the wrist.

[@KunieOG]

I own a Planet Ocean 45.5 Titanium but the Seamaster 300M is just as beautiful. I'd still stay with my trusty Planet Ocean. I concur with your point that it is more of a proper tool watch. It's also the more premium among the Seamaster line. I get compliments left and right. But you can't go wrong with both 🙂 Omega offers the best bang for buck among diver's watches.

[@Andy_Madrid]

The Planet Ocean is so good and luxurious for those in the know that it just kills your drive/desire to purchase any other sports watch because you know everything else in that category is 3rd rate in comparison.

[@maitrehg]

Absolutely !

[@brownmcpherson5724]

Harrison, both watches are Seamasters..... Nit picking aside, I have 4 Seamasters, 43.5 PO, a Titanium Ploprof and a 2234.50 and a 2255.80. Love my two 300's but do not like the bezel. The lume is far better than the PO or newer 300M like yours. The PO bezel is far superior, comparable to a Sub 41, which I have owned. Both my 300's are on Speedmaster bracelets as I really do not like the Bond style bracelet. I have an 8.25" wrist, so the size of the PO is not an issue. But it is the heaviest watch I own and is noticeable on the wrist. I've bought an Omega OEM rubber strap for it but the issue there is its way out of balance with the heavy head of the PO. I think the PO is a fantastic watch and clearly a better buy than a Sub and, for me at least, a more elegant design (not flashy) than the 300M.

[@LavisP]

Owned both. If I could have one again it would be the PO. Decent video again sir.

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

Thanks mate!

[@cjsolarmusic]

Love both. Got a gen 2 8500 PO and it felt too chunky/heavy… got a gen 1 and it’s magic. Wish they’d make one that size again but I’d get the new 43.5 if they thinned it out a bit!

[@steveb2042]

There is an important difference between the movements, with the PO the hour hand moves in hour increments at the first pull out position making it good for adjusting the time when travelling but it means you have to rotate it through 24 hours to change the date. On the 300m it is the more common date advancement at the first position. Both have their advantages

[@stefanpersson240]

The 8800 is also METAS-certified at +0/+6 s/d, so it is slightly worse. The 8900 i +0/+5.

[@anthonystevens8683]

Given that I'm (hopefully) never to reach the depth limits of 300m let alone 600m by first thought is both are overkill. But aesthetically to me the 300 looks better mainly because the date is at 6 and it doesn't have the mirror Arabic numerals. I'm fine with them at 3, 6 and 9 but the date replacing a 3 numeral bugs me. I love the flat dial of the PO and in my opinion the 8900 is my preferred movement but overall the SMP300M is the one for me. If I was a saturation diver I'd certainly consider the PO but would probably go for the titanium Pelagos from Tudor as a tool watch with 500m depth with in my opinion better lumed plots and fully lumed bezel. Each to our own as both watches are brilliant. Thanks for sharing Harrison (as always) for sharing.

[@dragonniz]

I have the granddaddy PO, the 2500 with aluminum bezel. It's the best one in my opinion, I tried on the new ceramic ones but I find the glossy blingy surfaces a turn off & the thickness is a little much, but not as much of a turn off as the overall blingy nature.

[@morgan97475]

Love my 2011 Seamaster P.O., a gift from my wife. Were it not for my rule of only one watch per brand, I'd get the blue Seamaster Pro 300, an Aqua Terra with rubber strap, and the 1957 vintage style Seamaster.

[@andrewwheeler8591]

Had the SMP and chopped it in for the 8900 PO. No brainer, better in every way 👌

[@MrJSTroy]

Don’t forget for the PO come 39.5mm version as well. I have the 39.5mm and it’s a perfect daily wear watch

[@nigelshackleton755]

I've had a PO and changed it for a Speedmaster DSOM. Now looking for a new diver and the 300SM was going to be my choice... so thanks for the review. As an alternative... would and IWC Aquatimer compare? Or even dare I say it.... a Bremont supermarine?? Would be great to get your thoughts (no one ever reviews Bremonts!!)

[@troyharkcom6441]

Planning on purchasing the summer blue PO after trying on a 300Pro and a PO. Just absolutely loved the PO!

[@matthewwhitney1693]

Great video buddy, I've got to go with the po ,I own the Goldeneye quartz,the casino royale po first generation,the no time to die titanium 300 and recently got the 43.5 orange rubber bezel insert,and I just love the planet ocean,I actually bought the recent po after watching you review of it and I know 43.5 is big but let's be honest it wears more like a 42, yeah it's a beast but a very sexy beast, anyway thanks for the video your videos really show the beauty of these gorgeous watches.

[@derhossa]

I own the blue 43,5mm PO. Before I bought it I compared it head to head against the SMP300. Besides the thickness the 300 had no chance against the PO. What you didn't mentioned is that the diameter of the bezel of both watches is the same at 42mm. That's why the PO wears like a 42mm and both wear pretty identical.

[@maitrehg]

True.

[@neho02]

For your diver 300m white, are you using the original nato and rubber strap from omega or from a different brand? Any tips? :)

[@The_Real_Edgar_Allen_Poe]

This guy is hands down the best watch reviewer

[@hansmayer7587]

PO is the perfect watch for me. I own it since almost 2 years and it has been fantastic. Really i can't think of one thing that has bothered me for that period of time. I have a Speedmaster, only because I like some variety, but if I had to choose I could wear PO as my only watch till the end of my life and I would be happy with it.

[@wux-qj1qj]

if comparing looks i’d say u picked the few color variations that actually look good on the 300 model out of like the 500 variations, and the PO one is a rather boring color variation when there are much better looking ones out there

[@GuyVanderAa]

I love the Seamaster 300 but the Planet Ocean is the better watch. 😎 It’s not a pure toolwatch. The design and materials make it beautiful as well. (Unlike for example a Tudor Pelagos). The PO is just more tough than the Seamaster Diver 300.

[@geralt.fh6255]

Love ur content!

[@karleintracht4958]

Should have compare the 2500 series PO with the 300M.

[@Stona999]

I have 3 PO's and one SM, so clearly I like the PO more, but both are great watches in their own right. I don't see myself buying another SM, but am on the hunt for a titanium PO to add

[@leightonsmith7413]

I have got a po chronograph , this takes the po to another level

[@r6ymy]

I have the same wrist size as you. I have owned a mid-size Brosnan era quartz SMP for over 20 years. About a year ago I wanted to buy a special watch with inheritance money. I looked at the No Time To Die Seamaster and the Black Bay 58 925, but ultimately went for a 39.5mm PO. The bracelet drapes beautifully, it is a chunky piece of metal but it's excellently proportioned and wears really well. I get what you say about the SMP being pretty, but to me the PO gives an impression of quality and indestructability that I love.

[@RootBeerGMT]

That first batch of Omega planet oceans with the orange bezel is legendary

[@TheSantiayo]

PO is a very cool tank !

[@NicolasMiari]

I like the concave silhouette of the SMP 300 so much more. It is the pinnacle of lyre lugs, IMHO. The thinner case, wave pattern dial, round indices off the cardinal positions, are all bonuses.

[@simonwright6882]

Not forgetting that the planet ocean is also made in a 39.5 mm case that fits beautifully on a 6.5 inch wrist.

[@GEWDJ]

Have and love, the Seamaster!

[@seanp7871]

P/O all day . Imo the helium escape valve suits the P/O . Where’s as 300m I don’t really like it . Bracelet on P/O way better too

[@TurnRiver]

The PO, especially the 39.5 version conforms to 2 objections that watch enthusiasts loathe the most, a thicker case and subtle to no bracelet taper. Yet, it wears so nice and fits smaller wrists better than its competitors. Its one of those watches that catches you by surprise once you try it on and wear it.

[@michaelostassr.2771]

So, if you do manage to damage the anti reflective coating, poly watch can maybe clear it up. FYI

[@JoeNoSay]

What is the name of the bracelet on the 300m?

[@nickbrooker1411]

i dive in UK waters - i ended up getting rid of my seamaster 300 - the scalloped bezel is totally useless with gloves, the skeleton hands equally useless..... the reason why Omega ended up changing these for the Planet Ocean - wise decision! I actually went to a Pelagos - higher spec than the Planet Ocean with even more improvements - inboard He valve (looks better and less chance of damage), fully lumed bezel, much better legibility, much much better bracelet and clasp - and a saving on the seamaster 300, let alone the PO!!! Seamaster 300m for sales reps/boardroom and the pub! PO/Peli for divers!

[@seanzealony9499]

Does having a Seamaster Railmaster count ? I’d have a PO over regular SM. But I’d like both to be honest but I’ll stick with my Railmaster at moment

[@AmitBhandari82]

Another faaaaaantastic video…..As always 😁 I’m going to opt for the SMP purely based on legibility. Ultimately though, I’d go Seamaster 2254.50 Peter Blake.

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

Thanks bud!!

[@KeepingWatchUK]

SMP imho. PO is too thick, too heavy, too busy (so much text on dial plus 3, 6, 9 not needed on a diver)

[@Lowdowndog]

Have a PO 39.5 summer blue and still want the Diver 300m in white. Would need to be on rubber though. So neither wins as I would dearly like both.

[@MauriceDay-em1xy]

Does the PO bracelet fit on the SMP?

[@robynsjp]

I want the PO with the proportions of the SMP. I basically went for the sword hands Peter Blake ones - and vintage Seamaster300s.

[@nhbmk]

I like both date positions - in fact, 3 oclock more because asymmetry creates enhanced visual interest!

[@JohnConnor636]

I could have bought either, went with 300smp because i have a Trident pro that is essentially really similar to the PO

[@ed7384]

We get it man you love your seamaster

[@rjg02005]

What's hilarious is that a 300M is an incredibly competent dive tool watch. I love the design of both, for different reasons, and unless you're one of only a handful of professional drivers that require the over-built nature of the PO, it's just down to a choice of design preference.

[@gtcih]

I own a Planet Ocean (orange accents) and a Rolex Sea-Dweller 43mm. For me the PO wins. It has more wrist presence.

[@Mark-lj1dj]

I have that exact Seamaster 300m and a white dial orange bezel Planet Ocean. The 300m is still my favourite. It's just more beautiful. The wave pattern and the depth and contrast of the dial. It's just such a stunning timepiece. The Planet Ocean is still stunning too though 😍 I just prefer the 300m

[@philippisler9901]

Not a seamaster Video again 🙄 We already know you love it.

[@ЛентяйЁпта]

So?

[@bobotmeister]

It's like a black bay vs pelagos question 😅 one is a tool the other a dressy option. Oh, i have the POUD in titanium. So PO for me.

[@ahha6304]

Although how much I love SMP, if Planet Ocean is available in the choice, it shall be PO btw YES YOU EMBRACE ALWAYS MEME

[@BennyLlama]

I love my SMP, but its lume is by far the worst in my collection. It just can't get enough charge from the lights at my office to make it legible in the dark whereas none of my others, watches ranging from $200-$5000, have that issue. It's the one thing that's kept me from buying another Omega.

[@joshuakaplan5726]

SMP300M all day. Cooler design aesthetic with better symmetry. Date at 6 o'clock. Wave motif. Isn't ridiculously thick like the PO.

[@maitrehg]

Not ridiculous. It's a men sport watch.

[@joshuakaplan5726]

@@maitrehg 16mm thick is ridiculous. Plenty of other men's sports watches well below 16mm.

[@maitrehg]

@@joshuakaplan5726 It's for men, not for boys.

[@JohnGarry-z5x]

PO is a better watch, but unfortunately large watches like this don't sell. So 300m pro is more popular. For a good comparison, consider the Submariner vs Sea Dweller - they are effectively the same watch apart from size, yet an ocean apart in popularity

[@Harry-tb8yo]

I bought an SMP 300 and a 42mm PO in 2008 and still have them in my collection. Back then there was a distinct difference between them. The SMP was more dressy and comfortable to wear while the slightly bigger and heavier PO was the tough guy, more toolish. The current models are bigger and heavier. While the PO remains the big boy the SMP lost a lot of its former versatility and convenience. Additionally I dislike the cupcake style He valve at the SMP while its more industrial design perfectly fits the PO. The PO also has the better movement with the time zone function. The only thing the SMP has going for it is the position of the date window. But that doesn't change the outcome for me. It's the PO for me.

[@josephrangelescamilla5620]

They are both Seamaster!

[@jameshardy4666]

PO reminds me of a Seiko Sumo. Not saying that’s a bad thing-I had a sumo and loved it.

[@shileztoreros]

Mine PO scratch a lot, and the bracelet got stock that Omega had to change it during the first 5 month, to be honest disappointing

[@maitrehg]

Got stock ??? What de you mean ?

[@jechisholm]

SMP300 white dial is fire 🔥

[@torbenrusch5250]

The greatest James Bond of all time Daniel Craig worn the Planet Ocean in Quantum of Solace and Spectre. This is reason enough. This is the reason too that i bought the PO!

[@scottmorrison147]

And Skyfall as well!

[@Harry-tb8yo]

He also wore a first gen. PO in 45.5mm on a rubber strap in Casino Royale.

[@alvinmarin8648]

Another Omega Seamaster video..😴🥱

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

This is that last one for a while! Just thought I’d do a little head to head between these two!

[@bellerophon9116]

They are both tool/sports watches by the very definition and function of what they do. One has more of a depth rating than, the other - but both are dive watches meant to serve that specific role/purpose. It mostly comes down to preference of how you want the watch to sit on your wrist, which style you like more, and which bracelet you prefer. Because let's face it, with few exceptions virtually no one will dive to any significant depth with these timepieces on their wrist. In terms of which looks more dressy, they both equal out. The liquid metal and ceramic bezel on the Planet Ocean has a nicer polished look than the 300m, but the 300m lug shape more generous crown guards afford more eye-catching high-polished edge real estate by a small margin to more evenly match the Planet Ocean's higher luster bezel. The Planet Ocean has a more bold wrist presence due to the added thickness, and the 300m more easily slides under a dress cuff. (Note: The Planet Ocean will also easily fit under a dress cuff by simply having the sleeve cuff button moved out about 1/4 of an inch for most people) The extra wrist presence does come at the cost of being more likely to get caught on things when moving about, but that can be avoided by paying more attention to your movements and what you do while wearing it. If you don't want to focus on such things as where you put your hands as often, pick the 300m. If price is a concern and you're on a tight budget, the 300m is cheaper. But the cost difference isn't huge and given that we are talking about a luxury timepiece, I suspect prospective buyers will have enough money to cover the cost difference. The Bond connection: Particularly speaking about the Daniel Craig era of Bond, you can take your pick of your favorite in the Seamaster line, because Craig wore several of the Seamaster models as part of Omega's marketing. Omega had Craig wearing the newest releases of many Seamaster timepieces at the time of the release of the various Bond films, so unless your heart is set on one of the screen accurate models, like the look of the previous models better, or want a more heavily discounted price for an Omega watch, the current iterations are worth considering for the refinements in the movements. Ex: The Caliber 8900 movement found in the current Planet Ocean and Aqua Terra is more refined than the previous 8500; however, the 8500 is still a great movement! But if you want the option the covers both the Craig era of Bond as well as the Brosnan era, the 300m is your only option. Caution: Specifically speaking of the Planet Ocean: If you're not used to wearing a heavier timepiece, wear a cheaper watch of similar weight and bulk every day for about a month or so until you grow used to it. The weight will affect your arm swing more than you will expect and it will cause your wrist to smack nearby surfaces until you've had time to adjust your patterns and muscle memory. Given that both Omega divers discussed here have somewhat vulnerable anti reflective coating on the outside of the crystal, a rough surface or sharp bur near a wall as you turn the corner inside/outside of building could prove to be an expensive repair if you scratch the anti reflective coating. This particular point could also impact you when wearing the 300m, but the Planet Ocean is noticeably heavier and thicker which more significantly increases the likelihood of an unintentional impact. Neither weight is uncomfortable on the wrist, but you'll notice more heft in the Planet Ocean than with the 300m.

[@georgecupac1202]

I'd take the 600.

[@divertiti]

Comparing to the 39mm Planet Ocean would have made much more sense

[@southern428]

Planet ocean all day long ❤❤

[@miabeatz80]

The Seamaster has better design while the PO has better bracelet. I'm hoping the next version of the 300m is slimmer at the very least and comes with a tapered strap. Not a big fan of the broad arrow hands on the PO even though I like it on other models. 300m for the win.

[@tachillecremonini387]

Planet Ocean ❤❤❤ Seamaster 300 ❤❤

[@metro2171]

Planet ocean with an absolute win

[@AntonioRamirez-s9f]

Do you know why Rolex and Doxa invented the automatic helium escape valve? Because divers kept forgetting to unscrew the crown to let out the helium during decompression. Therefore the Rolex/Doxa solution has an auto valve that opens by itself. Imagine how idiotic it must be to "invent" a helium escape valve that still requires you to remember to unscrew a crown, instead of you know, just using the regular crown. Just like I wouldn't buy a car with a second steering wheel even if the steering wheel looks cool, I wouldn't buy a diving watch with a second useless crown.

[@georgeparaskevopoulos6601]

I would go for the Planet Ocean hands down.

[@leemartin2978]

Seamaster all day long, but it’s in need of a refresh now

[@simonwright6882]

My vote is for the planet ocean in 39.5 mm because of the shorter lug to lug and better bezel action.

[@z06cowboy72]

Prefer the PO, especially the bracelet, hand set, and bezel.

[@leoanthony7281]

Planet Ocean is the real deal diver, the Seamaster is maybe aesthetically better looking except for the oversized wart on the right side of its head and it’s a bit lighter so it makes for a great desk diver. In literally every other way the Planet Ocean kills the Seamaster.

[@michelrainville1094]

PO has everything, no « fashion hype », wears great, adjustable bracelet is very very useful also. Serious watch that means business

[@ivonemec8059]

PO for men,SMP for children

[@hanialzaid8460]

If i could buy the 300m with the PO bracelet, id go with that 😅

[@consistency1907]

0:09 🗣️Ssinghhh

[@geopapak2632]

Omega seamaster 👏👍💪❤️❤️❤️

[@okidoki2952]

IMO the Diver 300M ( as always 😂) slightly dated bracelet but better size for me

[@serifdincer208]

Omega needs to stop paying celbreties and update there collection i have seen online various discounts on there Watches others brands are killing it

[@keyanmoine6162]

"If you want something smaller, I'd get the seamaster" Or just get the 39.5mm one 😂

[@alanfearon1653]

If it is good enough for Bond then it has to be a Planet Ocean! :)

[@maitrehg]

Planet Ocean by a mile. Looks WAY better. A fantastic watch for men.

[@simonotoole4437]

Had both but sold the PO and personally prefer the 300 hence still having it. I think it’s a much better and interesting looking watch and having a 6 o’clock date window. I found the honeymoon period ended relatively quickly with the PO. Admittedly I prefer the PO bracelet though and both are great watches.

[@kevinr206]

Thinner Planet Ocean no date with no escape valve wins!

[@JohnLFjellstad]

As much as I liked Brosnan's Bond, I just like the Planet Ocean better. To me, the 300m feels too much like a deskdiver, while the Planet Ocean was built first and foremost built for its purpose. It's on my list.

[@martinpearce7420]

His and Hers models lmao

[@myklbllngsly]

I’m on team No Crown Guards. Crown guards are goofy, I can’t think of a time where anyone needs them or how they would even protect a crown. Plus a lot look ugly as sin (Longines)

[@HarrisonBrownsLife]

The King of course 👑

[@snapfitness1]

Open case back .... over rated imo. I'm not taking my watch off to look at the movement because all I need it to do is work as designed.

[@maitrehg]

So wrong.

[@ViolinistWilliam]

I’ve literally never seen the planet ocean look attractive on anyone. Just my opinion.

[@Sumerdini]

Longines Spirit😝

[@drlawyc]

“My name is Harrison, as always” Isn’t your name always your name? I mean, why even say “as always”? I’m all for catch phrases, but yours just makes me stop watching after I hear your intro repeat time and time again that your name is always Harrison.

[@deshawn2877]

Do people actually dive that deep? 10 feet is the most for me lol