One of the BEST affordable GMT's, Steinhart Ocean 39 GMT.2 Ceramic Review,

[@marceauratard6869]

Steinharts are hard to beat for the money. Good review

[@mathieut3197]

I have this exact watch on wrist right now. It has quickly become my favorite, so I am in the process of buying a 42mm black bezel jubilee bracelet diver and a standard ocean one. Quality is impressive, they are extremely comfortable, my only issue is with the mediocre cyclops I will eventually pop off.

[@WristWatching]

Excellent review! You're quickly becoming my favourite watch channel on KZbin, top notch editing and cinematography. I absolutely love my Steinhart Ocean 39 GMT 500 Premium. It's amazing how much quality Steinhart offers at such an affordable price.

[@BraveBeaters]

Ha, Thank you :) Yes, i Think Steinhart offers a lot for the price paid.

[@paulvon2378]

I have never heard a bad word about Steinhart. Great value and no waiting list nonsense

[@antonhallergren588]

Only issue is the clasp but who cares at 5-600 euros anyway.

[@GeorgeUK84]

I once heard somebody called them a Rolex rip-off.

[@paulvon2378]

@@GeorgeUK84 did you make that up?

[@GeorgeUK84]

@@paulvon2378 No, I quoted somebody who owns a Rolex Submariner.

[@ThisIsDavesGarage]

@@GeorgeUK84 I know people that own genuine Rolex Subs and also collect Steinhart because the love the design but don't want to wear their sub in dangerous places or where it might get scratched or dirty. They also love the Steinharts. There are rolex rip offs, the steinhart uses a Rolex design, but it is not a rip off or replica. Almost every popular dive watch today originates its design from rolex sub.

[@andrei-cosmin.popa85]

Thank you, Andrei, for reviewing this beautiful strutocamila of a watch! One thing I appreciate about Steinhart is they kept their prices reasonable although they wave the "swiss made" flag into customers' faces. Also, unlike way too many other brands, they were pretty smart about their oyster-like bracelets, which have female end-links to improve the comfort of their flat pan subs on the wrist. I've considered their 9401/0 homage, but decided to build my own, which turned out to be both fun and rewarding.

[@thetimemachine3828]

The female end links are the worst thing on a Steinhart. There's always a ugly gap between the end link and the 1st link of the bracelet that makes the whole thing look cheap. That's just bad design, which is funny coz its the only thing on the watch Steinhart did design. 🤣

[@BraveBeaters]

Thanks for your thoughts Andrei, and apologies for the delay :D Agree, I tink Steinhart is a Honest brand. offers solid movements for great prices. I just bought a flieger a Nav B with Unitas from them :)

[@picassoboy52]

They don't wave anything in your face. Either your astute enough to know what to look for or you buy a Casio. No one flagging you to look at something.

[@picassoboy52]

I have 4 Steinhart and this one is next. They are excellent quality. You will be totally satisfied

[@patricj951]

I have one: Ocean blue 39 ceramic. A stunning watch. I just wish it was a bit larger.

[@stephengarratt8027]

I've got a ocean one vintage gmt which is a lovely watch. Yes you can say that the brand is controversial for the community, but, the build quality is very nice. Great videos and its nice to see your diversity in brand selection and price point.

[@anthonysmith2982]

I've got the same piece. The 1655 Explorer II it homages is one of my favourite watches full stop, so I had paid for my Steinhart ʟɪᴛᴇʀᴀʟʟʏ 5 mins after I found out it existed!... which is unlike me. Still, one of my favourite pieces a few years later.

[@paulvon2378]

If controversial is making a great watch for 1/13th the price then controversy is a good thing. My $650 Steinhart GMT/Ceramic 2 is as good as my Tag Heuer Formula 1 or Longines Conquest and both cost a few hundred dollars more.

[@stephengarratt8027]

@@paulvon2378 You can't argue with logic

[@thehooch-man2657]

Nice video. I really like what Steinhart has been doing. For those who will never own a Rolex, this brand gives a lot bang for the buck. I have no problems with homages. As long as the quality is decent I'd buy one. This version of the Pepsi GMT is quite a handsome piece.

[@marvinberwart]

What a change in the style of your videos! This looked quite a bit like a Yourterrific vid, but I say it in a good way, it still has your own vibe too. Outstandig job, fun to see your work and style evolve. As for the watch, I'm not a fan of the original so the homage does nothing for me but it certainly is a very well built watch for the price.

[@BraveBeaters]

haha, It's because of the bright colors used, pepsi theme :D

[@marvinberwart]

@@BraveBeaters also because of the music and the fact you didn't appear. Anyway, it was nice and enjoyable👍

[@anthonysmith2982]

Steinhart offer some of the best value for money at ~$500. Personally, I prefer my homages to be of timepieces that are no longer in production, like their Explorer II ref. 1655 or Tudor Snowflake homages, but that's neither here nor there: the quality is really good, ᴇsᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟʟʏ mov't wise. Using an elaboré 1 grade Selitta or ETA puts them way in front of any competition. It's funny André, my wrist is larger than yours but I sorta wish my Steinhart - the 1655 homage - came in 39mm. The 42mm wears really well - very similar to the PH200M in fact, it's just a little heavier than I'd like. Cheers again bud. Hope you're well. ✌🏼️

[@BraveBeaters]

haha, yes, it depends from experience to experience. the 1655 homage, true, should be on a 39, 40 mm :)

[@johncorcoran2569]

Thanks for a great review. Thinking about buying this watch. Your review is very helpful!

[@trooper427ss]

I own this model and 19 other Steinhart's. Love um.

[@BraveBeaters]

OMG :D

[@picassoboy52]

I thought I had a lot at 4 lol. Buying this one next

[@seayak]

I am up to five Steinharts and love them all. Trying to hold the line there - wish me luck....

[@gwapogreg5837]

Great review.I own a Rolex GMT and the only homage Pepsi watch of any quality is this Steinhart.

[@DaneFerolin]

Just ordered one, thanks for the details!

[@BobMarley-pm1xb]

Terrific watches. Fine value and I really enjoy my Steinhart GMT 39 Vintage as well. Good channel. I am a new sub. Very professional review!

[@GeorgeUK84]

39? You must have small wrists.

[@jochenkey]

On its way in alu & ceramic 🙋🏼‍♂️ Great video as always brother

[@RazvanM253]

Ce tare! Nu stiam ca esti roman sau ca vorbesti romaneste! Am comandat si eu acest model si astept sa ajunga. Chiar daca am si un rolex, consider ca raportul calitate pret este acum in 2024 imbatabil. Recunosc ca te urmaresc de ceva timp, dar acum subiectiv vorbind o sa ma si abonez😁

[@cuestion-de-tiempo]

Hello Andrei, thanks again for great content, question, what's the dial size in milimeters? I am looking into the Kermit offered by Steinhart, I think its a nice piece that gives tribute to a discontinued model that I really like. Thanks bud!

[@BraveBeaters]

Hi, I have to say the size of the dial is pretty small. I returned the watch and I cannot measure it sadly. I think a Kermit on an aluminium can look very cool.

[@cuestion-de-tiempo]

@@BraveBeaters Thanks my friend, and yes the green aluminum bezel with black dial should look great this summer - cheers!

[@patricj951]

Great review of a very attractive watch! I wonder why Steinhart continue with the straight lugs. They should be aware of the critics of it. If they were not so straight I would like to have the 42mm version. But with my 6,7 inch wrist I need to choose the 39mm. The question is if I will perceive the bezel and dial too small. Apart from that I wish this model was available without the GMT hand. It's a feature I will never have use of, and the extra hand on the dial is an unnecessary distracting detail.

[@BraveBeaters]

Thanks. I think is good that they keep the case different, than the oyster :)

[@spawn2105]

Did you end up buying the 39mm one? If yes, how do you perceive the bezel and dial size?

[@patricj951]

@@spawn2105 Not yet. A few G-shocks came between so it will be later.

[@patricj951]

@@spawn2105 Sorry for the delay of update: I got the Ocean blue ceramic around 3 months ago. Absolutely beautiful watch with excellent finish. The straight lugs is not a problem at all on my 17cm/6,7 inch wrist. I have a few other diver watches with 43-45mm bezel size, and yes: the 39mm Steinhart looks small in comparison. I would really like if the 42mm Steinhart had more curved lugs, or shorter lug to lug distance. I am not completely sure but I think the lugs of 42mm version might be a bit too big on my wrist because they are so flat. But 39mm version no problem at all. And I actually think I prefer a watch which looks a bit on the small side before a watch with lugs who look too big on the wrist. I have not decided which one yet, but I consider to get another 39mm model.

[@AK-rq1cz]

Awesome watch and awesome review as always. I'd snag it if they released the 39mm GMT in titanium and dropped the Mercedes hour hand.

[@jaystavros7177]

Looks like they did that now. They have a titanium 39mm batman homage without Mercedes hands.

[@keiths5931]

I didnt even realize this was Mr. Andrei at first as I saw this on my phone and just saw that it was a Steinhart GMT video just put out. I then see it on my computer and notice the "Brave Beaters" on in the corner and Im like "Oh shit...!" Thanks for the great content! Also, if you order in the US the VAT is taken off, so it makes it a bit cheaper across their lines.

[@BraveBeaters]

Sorry for the late reply :D OMG the VAT of the original price from their website is off? I need to move to US!

[@keiths5931]

@@BraveBeaters Oh np! Youve got crap loads of comments to wade through. Yeah without the VAT the prices are quite nice!

[@TheVuducha]

Steinhart unwristed a lot of other more expensive watches. The quality is amazing for the asking pice.

[@ClassicalProtestant]

It’s so interesting as we look at luxury brands homage each other and it’s coined as their “expression of version” of. The amount of luxury one for one homage is astonishing. Let alone micro brands sheesh. I own 2 Steinhart gmts with a Rolex budget and I found the rare jewel of contentment in them both.

[@ManVsWatch]

Hi my friend ! Very nice review as always 👍🏻😊

[@rickfouser1848]

Love the watch and your video. I have a 7 inch wrist and am unsure whether to get a 39 or 42. Thoughts?

[@jochenkey]

Hey @rickfouser1848 which one did you get ? Sorry I‘m late to the party. I have a 6.5 inch wrist and gave the 39mm Steinhart Starbucks (which looked ok on my wrist) to my wife with her 5.7 inch wrist, looks great on her and ordered a 42mm like the one in that video myself 😬 I like 42-43mm L2L max. 51mm Personal preference / Team Steinhart

[@RobertMoritz-u2x]

I own this watch and I Love it!!!

[@teddyhenriquez5192]

I have the Marine Blue 39 and it gets more wrist time than any other watch in my collection.

[@ph69jbl]

I see the reminisce of the Rolex brand on it :) ... although I do like what I see and judging by the dimensions I bet she wears nicely! great vid! 👍🏻

[@despoiler79]

For the same price you get... a Seiko with misalign chapter ring, a shitty bracelet plus a shitty movement that can't keep time (+10, -15 sec/day) I had a Steinhart Ocean one military vintage, (OVM) on the chonograph ran at +1 sec /day. Overall better on every aspect. Im not even a Steinhart fanboy, I wear Hamilton mostly and I had many other brands. But, I can tell you that Steinhart is about the best you can get for the money.

[@BraveBeaters]

I appreciate your thoughts, i agree, Steinhart offers great watches for the price paid! I am a fanboy of Hamilton as well :)

[@kevinblack8365]

I have the 42mm Black Red (Coke) Ceramic. It has (almost guaranteed) the Sellita SW330-1 movement, same as the 39....... I was initially concerned that the accuracy was out. Worn 24/7 on the wrist it ranged from +14.7 to -11 spd. This is outside Sellita's specs, but then watch makers' say what was the watch orientation, how long was it in that position, how wound was the main spring etc and as I say, it's real world, worn 24/7. I was about to send it back to Gnomon, but in the last couple of weeks it's been within +/- a couple spd. So, did the movement 'settle in' (I think so). There are mixed opinions about movements settling in, many say there is no such thing, about the same number say yes, it is a thing. Based on my 5 week experience, it is a thing. As far as the watch goes, it is great, I love the way the ceramic bezel 'pops'. It sits nicely on the wrist, My wrist is only 17cm circumference, but flat, so it's about my sweet spot. Now that the timekeeping has settled down, I really love it. The GMT hand is also great, with colleagues in the US and AUS it's good to have that second time zone at a glance (and not pissing them off ringing them at zero dark hundred). Would I recommend? yes. Would I buy again? yes.

[@The3924]

I own a Steinhart watch and find it to be quite an attractive timepiece.

[@CptSlow89]

What is your wrist size? I have around 17cm/6.7 inch and dunno if the 39mm or 42mm fit better. edit: Ok I saw that we have same wrist size, so 39mm looks fine :) I am glad that they offer rubber straps on their website cuz I like them, same as leather and nato.

[@imranbecks]

I bought the Steinhart Batman over this one. Though this one is nice, I found the colours to be really bright. The bezel colours really pop. I wanted something more subtle so I chose the Batman instead. I think this one should be called the Superman because of how bright the blue and red is on the bezel!

[@seayak]

I did the same thing, got the Batman over the Pepsi. Have had it for over a year and still love it. More recently I discovered the Ocean 39 Vintage GMT, which has also found its way into my collection. Two very different watches, one more modern and sporty, the other a bit smaller, more subtle, and vintage-inspired. Have to love the 30 atmosphere waterproofness of both models, though, and the robust ceramic bezels. Those features outperform either of the Rolex originals for everyday wear and active living.

[@victordraghici4229]

Felicitări pentru review! Chiar arată foarte bine gmt-ul. Spuneai într-un video mai vechi că la Ocean One poți diferenția cal.Eta 2824-2 de Sellita SW200, adică dacă armează când înșurubezi coronița este Sellita...am înțeles bine? Mulțumesc și încă o dată felicitări pentru content.

[@BraveBeaters]

Salut, da. asa imi pare mie- tot ce se infileteaza si face winding imi pare sellita.

[@victordraghici4229]

@@BraveBeaters e bine de știut. mulțumesc mult 🙏

[@madrockwatchesadventure4501]

Owned an OVM-1. Loved it. Sold it. Regret it. Need it again. Ha

[@BraveBeaters]

hahah

[@stevefox8605]

Not a fan of this one, looks too much like the Submariner which I dislike- however, I am considering the Steinhart "Steve McQueen" Explorer (with GMT). Steinhart look like excellent value for specification. Cheers mate 👍🏻👍🏻

[@BraveBeaters]

Fair enough! the mc queen explorer is cool :D

[@dbungjulio]

Saying you don't like the Rolex Submariner is like saying you don't like the Beatles. It's an irrelevant opinion.

[@stevefox8605]

@@dbungjulio pretty relevant to me 😉

[@NCSheriff7]

@@dbungjulio the beatles? I prefer 2pac, George Michael, Joe Cocker or Madonna. Everything just no Beatles for me.

[@alanfearon6568]

I think I need to stick to the larger 42mm as though I like this watch, it looks too small on my 19cm wrist.

[@paulvon2378]

Question: was the watch in this video a 39mm? Looks big for a 39mm

[@FabienTeulieres93]

I was wondering the same thing. I think it might be a 42mm case.

[@picassoboy52]

If you look at the name of the video it says 39

[@picassoboy52]

Fabien Teulieres read the name of the video. 39

[@paulvon2378]

mucho gracia@@picassoboy52

[@paulvon2378]

it wears big for a 39mm. I own this watch. Great looking!@@FabienTeulieres93

[@jasonhall10]

Really great review, thank you.

[@GoalSquad666]

The problem what I have with watch copies is... they watch copies. It doesn't matter how good they are. Before I spend £400 or more on a 1-to-1 copy, just with a different logo/naming - I buy a good original watch from a brand what has heritage, or go down the risky route and look at micro brands.

[@Fozec]

Watch about the watch now? Still any good ? 😁😊

[@markq1]

I cant decide 39 or 42 for my 7.5" wrist

[@BraveBeaters]

The watch has a vintage appeal. I would recommend 39 mm

[@james911]

@@BraveBeaterswill 39 look too small on a 7.5 wrist

[@PatDiCola]

I have the Ocean GMT Vintage. My favorite watch.

[@seayak]

The Vintage GMT is of my favourites too, and my most recent purchase. I have the 39 mm version. My Steinhart collection includes the "Batman" "Classic Ceramic GMT and the "Hulk" Double Green Premium, both in 42 mm. These are watches that get noticed and attract compliments. However sometimes the smaller size just works when you want a more subtle look, or to fit cleanly under your shirt cuff. I like my 39 mm Ocean One Greem Ceramic "Kermit" for the same reason.

[@SaSpursFan]

Looks amazing but I just don’t want to have that convo where somebody asks me “ohh is that a Rolex?!“

[@BraveBeaters]

Hahaha! It will probably happen

[@jil2936]

someone asked me that and i said i love watches but can never afford a rolex my whole life. this watch is the best homage for rolex and its not replica. basically i cant afford 10gs for a watch but can respect homage made thats not a replica

[@johnwick860]

3rd time watching this... I am planning on the coke ceramic oyster

[@midwestgent9618]

Nice work, you deserve more subs

[@rohanleander]

Amazing review.

[@BraveBeaters]

Glad you enjoyed it :)

[@petergeorgiou6747]

Apologies if I missed it in the vid but what is your wrist size?

[@BraveBeaters]

Hi, sorry for the late reply, its 7 inch, 17 cm in circumference.

[@moonattack4745]

Great video quality! Keep it up!

[@DavidMunoz-wt6lt]

I love it. I have one on the way. Gnomon will remove the cyclops for $40.

[@BraveBeaters]

haha, I wasnt aware that Gnomon charges to remove the cyclops

[@liveperformance1971]

Grande orologio🖐️

[@ClassicalProtestant]

Great review

[@stephenbridges2791]

Nice review. I would have to opt for their 42mm version as I have 8.5 inch wrists. I think the 39 would look too small. I have a 47mm flieger that doesn't look a bit out of place on me. All the controversy is just a bunch of noise.

[@tylerconlon1990]

Which model is the one with a Lume bezel

[@udoirsa3305]

I like to purchase one What do I do

[@daisymontague9515]

For those that own this Steinhart, what kind of compliments/feedback have you received from strangers, friends, coworkers and watch enthusiasts?

[@BraveBeaters]

I guess positive. I personally received positive feedbacks.

[@uhrologe2596]

Very well pronouced "Steinhart". Didn't expect.

[@donadoni6551]

👍👍👍👍👍

[@michaelkilbride2927]

I have one bad Dial sharp edges on jubilee braclet bady made

[@tomasrb]

nice bracelet

[@nowtacoma]

How do you think this measures up to the Lorier GMT?

[@atticus6572]

The Lorier is a truer GMT, with a bidirectional bezel rather than the Steinhart's diver-style unidirectional. I would also vouch for the Lorier's movement over the Steinhart's, but that's more subjective. Still, the Steinhart has two things that the Lorier does not; affordability and availability. I recommend the Baltic Aquascaphe GMT as well - my personal favourite, mixing Rolex, Blancpain and even Zodiac design cues.

[@khairyalonto]

Is it a true gmt?

[@seayak]

I just don't see the value proposition of a Rolex as compare to these finely made Steinhart timepieces. You are paying a premium for the proprietary Rolex movement, which only your watchmaker will ever see, who by the way will charge you multiples of the service fee as compared to your Steinhart when it needs lubricating or regulating. I can't imagine owning an expensive sports car without ever being able to lift the hood and admire the engine.

[@jean4j_]

Ceramic or aluminum though?

[@jean4j_]

@Dell Wright I actually bought the the Steinhart aluminum GMT Pepsi and it looks gorgeous. Yes it does look great on the old Rolex too obviously. But totally looking great on the Steinhart actually. In my opinion anyway. I don't like the shiny/bing-bling vibe of the ceremic bezel. But looking amazing also for sure.

[@jean4j_]

@Dell Wright I bought the aluminum one last month. It was very hard to choose because I had never seen a Steinhart in real life. I tried on a Rolex GMT aluminum and ceramic at a Watchfinder shop. I preferred the aluminum one. Overall I don't like ceramic bezel, I guess I like old school things haha Yes I know, ceramic are more durable. But it's alright. I like the look of it and it was a good choice after all.

[@ArshBarmi]

What song is that

[@AKRex]

Affordable cost - TICK Style - TICK Suitable size (I have a slim wrist) - TICK German/Swiss made - TICK Why not? 🤷‍♂

[@johnwick860]

I'm buying a Steinhart Sub

[@juanchistrd]

I prefer San Martin or Cronos

[@smokeyb71]

What one would you suggest to buy out of those two?

[@pamjeankay5681]

I have 3

[@BraveBeaters]

same model? :D I will make a comparative review with the baltic aquascaphe this week.

[@markwatson7551]

Nice watch but you get what you pay for...my GMT failed after a few months and after sales service is poor with little communication. Disappointed and cannot buy another Steinie.

[@WristWatching]

I had excellent experience with their customer service. They got me to ship my watch back to Germany and fixed it free of charge without any questions. Did you reach out to Gnomon or Steinhart directly?

[@johnsweeney5946]

Hour markers are a bit too large and the center jubilee links are not polished....Ruinous

[@Seriously140]

Get rid of the crap music.

[@dralzgamer2354]

I think its hilarious calling plain theft a "hommage"

[@ThePlaiibox]

Just too much of a rolex homage for my liking and too much like a lot of aliexpress watches visually.

[@DavidMunoz-wt6lt]

Can’t say that until you’ve handled one. Night and day difference. Blows away any aliexpress garbage.