Patek Philippe Cubitus...is this Watch a Good Idea for the Brand!?

[@balthus9265]

As long as Patek keeps low production numbers for this model, people will pile up on waitlists trying to buy it. As a novelty from Patek, just throw some unobtainium, light the hype and that’s it.

[@dnhug]

Liked, cheers for your take on it!

[@watchsymposium]

Thanks for watching!

[@structurescience]

Watching from Denia, Spain 🇪🇸

[@carlkim2577]

What's next a swatch collab?

[@underachievingwatchcollect1878]

Patek has to do something to get younger people into the brand-their current demographic is close to circling the drain 😎!

[@danny77670000]

The Cubitus box is tiny

[@Crazy_Joe_Davola]

It's growing on me

[@RC-xp5zr]

A hit

[@lelocle4262]

Patek's Squadra

[@satai]

Cubitus is really a joke .. with the hint to the Nautilus .. but well, it matches the look pretty well

[@oddpout]

I cant get over the name

[@watchsymposium]

Right, I mean it's not really a cube, so it doesn't make much sense. And apparently, the definition of "cubitus" is a part of an insect wing, which is even more unexplainable. Couldn't they have thought of a better name?

[@satl3161]

Name is terrible

[@theyhateme8763]

stop eating cryons

[@Shawn-o4z8y]

Sounds like disease from between your legs

[@watchwarrior8597]

This watch is just another version of the Monte Carlo by Tag Heuer and the Cartier Santos watch . Patek Philippe should stick to their traditional watch style and design . Patek Philippe has always been a watch that is well designed and functional . Just as Rolex is a watch that has kept its design integrity the same for nearly 80 years as the tool watch it hasn’t changed course in the basic shape of the watch design and aesthetic. Austin you made a very good point about the minute hand reaching the markers on rectangular or square watches . There is just something lost in translation when it comes to non round watches, it’s almost empty space . Great video Austin 👍👍😀

[@watchsymposium]

Thanks for watching! "There is just something lost in translation when it comes to non round watches..." I feel like that too, as the circle is a better representation of the eternal nature of time.

[@jonathansmith283]

the dial does not look balanced - ~ JDS/CT. - agree , the name is poop

[@michaelfierman3256]

It’s hideous if you don’t mind me suggesting

[@satl3161]

Looks beautiful. Name is hideous

[@spizzenergi2292]

@@satl3161it’s gorgeous and on the wrist it fits like the Santos they’ve nailed it.

[@michaelduldner2262]

It’s not my cup of tea, seems expensive. Grand Seiko looks better and probably has better quality.

[@simonassouline1230]

AP came out with a complete stupid elongated square watch! Now Patek, has become even more dumber!

[@tiempodesobrahn]

backfire is putting it gently… wishful thinking

[@BAF605]

Cartier and JLC do it better.

[@jmbaug1229]

Patek 😂😂😂 embarrassing design 🤭 JMB

[@RAJohnson713]

It’s ehh…the design is very unoriginal and it’s too big!

[@edblair5253]

Patek isnt for poppers and normies. If normies ever do start buying new Pateks it will be a travesty. A bit like Rolex lately.

[@NorskInjustis]

very ugly

[@ThriftyCHNR]

1. the name is lame and childish sounding 2. the dial is all over the place and is plagiarized lazily from the nautilus 3. the case is not very cohesive in its design, possibly looks like a nautilus scrunched into a cube shape 4. that strap doesn't look too complementing, lets hope they designed a really good bracelet

[@theyhateme8763]

ya because a guy in moms basement wearing his swatch moonwatch thinking its legit thinks

[@aciel-tv]

as a nautilus owner, i think its hideous looking. lol... Good thing i m not with the minority (most think it looks hideous). Then again, most thought aquanaut was a bad copy initially (so we will know as time goes by). Good for whoever's trying to get into the brand i guess, but its definitely not "entry" range or whichever cos these are probably gonna be sold way over retail, and new owners would likely have a problem buying it also anyways (the irony)

[@watchsymposium]

I wonder if, like you mention, people will come around to the aesthetics. I'm already starting to like it more and more. (But I don't need a moon phase on a sporty Patak, so give me a GMT sub-dial instead!)

[@n1ggo892]

I guess its fake 💩

[@watchsymposium]

Patek really getting an early start for April 1st. And that's commitment, taking out the spread in a magazine.

[@bent540]

wortshipping things is unhealthy

[@theyhateme8763]

30 k isnt budget

[@watchsymposium]

It certainly isn't budget to me. But it's all relative!

[@theyhateme8763]

@@watchsymposium its not a budget watch for anyone.. yet every watch is a budget to everyone

[@theyhateme8763]

@@watchsymposium this watch like you said it to attract new younger guy.. like evolation sometimes you get a butterfly another day you get mongo eating cryons

[@bsbullshit2024]

To me, it just looks like an ugly copy of cartier