Ferrari's GREATEST F1 car explained

[@amitanshthakur5261]

Most underlooked and soo good that they used it even in 1st half of the '03 season!!! As JC would day "WHAT A MACHINE!"

[@AZBCDEE]

And then with assistance from Bridgestone who was assisted by the FIA towards the end of the season, when Ferrari werent winning Bridgestone had to go wail to the FIA and couldn’t handle Michelin run teams and got another free championship. Teams champion whom belonged to Williams and drivers belonged to kimi or Montoya

[@amitanshthakur5261]

@@AZBCDEE stop crying about something that happened almost 2 decades ago!

[@AZBCDEE]

@@amitanshthakur5261 Ah the typical wailing Indian butthurt response ‘stop crying’ 🤣 🤣 ferrari are worthless. Red bull and Merc>>>Ferrari (assisted by the FIA) Since you never said anything against it I guess you can’t deny the truth

[@demdjen77]

@@AZBCDEE Michelin had to change their tyres because they were too wide at the end of the race. In other words: Michelin was cheating. CRY.

[@ravi_s]

This car definitely shares the same space as the likes of the Ferrari F2004, 1988 McLaren, 2013 RedBull and the 2020 Mercedes-Benz W11

[@helloitsme3940]

Yup, as well as lotus 72 and 79, and Mercedes w07

[@KenaiTobin]

Schumacher + Ferrari = dominance

[@5coutboi280]

@@helloitsme3940 and the 1950 and 1951 Alfa Romeo, the 158 and 159

[@prateekgill27]

And renault R25/R26

[@5coutboi280]

@@prateekgill27 mmm, nah, it was a great car but wasen't dominant

[@angxlzj]

I think that the f2002 had less hard competition than the f2004 had, so thats why the lowest position was 2nd. Overall in terms of speed and actual power, the f2004 was their best in my opinion

[@AndyFromBeaverton]

I think the difference, as pointed out by madebyperspective, was the simplistic beauty of the car. It was clean without all that aerocrap bolted on.

[@MrOiram46]

yup, f2004 is the f2002 on steroids

[@ericroper380]

Your wrong the f2004 didn’t have that much competition and 2 the f2002 won races in two different seasons

[@angxlzj]

First of all I ain’t saying the f2004 had hard competition or even competition. Simply put the f2004 more powerfull than f2002

[@ericroper380]

@@angxlzj you said the f2002 had less competition and we not caring about power rn we talking about stats the f2002 won 3 races in 2003 the f2004 was used in the first couple of races in 2005 and it wasn’t competitive

[@Zacaria0251]

1988 Mclaren 1992 Williams 2002 and 2004 Ferrari 2013 Redbull 2020 Mercedes Those cars were just awesome man

[@fqeagles21]

Mercedes was not legendary

[@AZBCDEE]

@@fqeagles21 fastest f1 car ever built and yet here you are crying about Merc 😂

[@fqeagles21]

@@AZBCDEE still doesn't has the record of only P1 or P2,and it's too recent

[@Randomvideos-zi7pe]

@@fqeagles21 if anything recent, its you.

[@prypiatshadow]

@@fqeagles21 Yeah, Cause teams are more competitive, and the teammates better. That's coming from a Redbull fan.

[@isuckatthisgame]

They won some races they shouldn't have won because Ferrari operationally worked like a clockwork under the Todt-Brawn-Schumacher dream team. No team before or after was so flawless. That's why I rate 2004 Belgium GP as one of the greatest wins in F1 history, when Kimi managed to beat them with sheer speed.

[@dragospahontu]

How? Binotto is also good

[@mac.fk14]

@@dragospahontu 😂😂😂😂

[@dragospahontu]

@@mac.fk14 he's a good engineer

[@emilekaram6094]

You should put also Hungary 2014 and Malaysia 2015 when Danny Ric and Seb beated those 2 out of 3 unbeatable Mercedes cars, stronger than Ferrari ones.

[@BurningEmerald]

Shockingly, somehow this video didn’t end with “and Ferrari still lost the Championship”!

[@helloitsme3940]

🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

[@olivierfritzen2749]

Never forgot the Schumacher factor

[@godfather95mbs33]

Thats because most brits only make videos about ferrari failures When a team has 15 drivers titles and so many close losses, they probably built a ton of great cars

[@alexnowis2468]

Back then, Ferrari were unbeatable, the whole team was on another level, I would argue better than Merc in their peak.

[@rickygrenadier6303]

@@godfather95mbs33 He's Australian

[@ryandavies7978]

Don't mention Austria 2002 without mentioning Indianapolis 2002

[@MadeByPerspective]

👀 🇺🇸

[@isuckatthisgame]

Anyone who complains about Austria 2002 should be ashamed. Every single Barrichello win that year was gifted by Schumacher. In Hungary in 2002, Michael was P2 but comfortably faster than Rubens, he just refused to pass him. USA, as you mentioned, he slowed before the finish line. In Italy and Germany, 0.2 seconds behind. He was literally letting Rubens win and not on one occasion! And if you still complain, go back to 2000 Spanish GP and watch what happens at lap 50.

[@stepladder3257]

This is this best Ferrari F1 car ever made, but my personal pick for best F1 car ever is the F2004, I agree that the W11 is a monster and watching Hamilton and Bottas doing laps on it was a pleasure, but what the F2004 achieved at that time was insane, it set very high standards in F1 to the point FIA made sure they won’t win in 2005 (until USA lol), and the fact it still holds the race lap records in Monza and pre-2022 Melbourne is insane

[@sultanabran1]

i always considered the f2002 to be more dominant than the 2004.

[@tommymckeown1699]

I love this car , it's one of my favorite F1 cars of all time , the livery , the aesthetics , everything.

[@acr3201]

What a car this was!!!

[@MadeByPerspective]

Phenomenal 🔥

[@Guitarjosii]

Last week I visited the Michael Schumacher Private Collection in Cologne, Germany and staying in front of all these golden era Ferraris was truly incredible. I really enjoyed the F2002.

[@namenamename390]

The car was so dominant that they had to change the points system to make 2003 somewhat competitive and Michael still won that.

[@emilekaram6094]

2002 and 2004: the cars so good it shocked Ferrari 2005: the car so bad it shocked Ferrari

[@razzaaaa2950]

Mate that car was something else Ferrari chucked a jet engine in that! Great video brud

[@Jakebdb56]

By far my favorite as well. Goosebumps every time I watch a video of it around the track.

[@coolguy10060]

I was Lucky enough to see all those ferrari's in 2019 at FOS where they celebrated Michael's first championship

[@ishmeet07]

Absolutely love the content. F2002 set the groundwork for F2004. Both cars were absolute beasts. Just a small thing, didn’t Schumacher get P3 once in Malaysia at the start of that season? But other than that yeah it was all P1 and P2

[@Jorge.Painkiller]

IMO the F2007 is my favorite Ferrari, the brutal amounts of aero that it has combined with its beautiful tone of red

[@thenumbersmasonwhatdotheym8876]

man your contents are on another level! the conspiracy series and all other stuffs! fav f1 content channel

[@tashirosato9053]

I agree it's a great Mod for F1 2020

[@fam.hunger5244]

The F2002 was a great car. Without a doubt, but the F2004 was better in every aspect. I have talked to some Ferrari engineers and to Marc Gene who explained why and thats also the reason why the F2004 is named first when it comes to the best Ferrari ever. The F2002 was not stiff enough in some areas. This made the car slower towards the end of the race. This lead to Ferrari improving much in this area and doing a lot of research and the F2004 was perfectly stiff where it needed and lighter where it did not need to be stiff. So the F2004 was not only the first F1 car built with this engineering approach(what is still used today), it also made the F2004 a much better car than the F2002. Marc Gene still says this was the perfect car! And also the Ferrari engineers say that the F2004 was superior to the F2002 in every aspect. So - the F2002 was without a doubt an amazing car, but the F2004 was definetely a much better car. And thats not my standards - its the standards of the Ferrari engineers of these days and the drivers like Marc Gene, who was testdriver for Ferrari in those days.

[@emilekaram6094]

So by this point you consider the W11 better than W05-06-07 because of that reason??

[@davidaugustofc2574]

Yes, I recall Mika Häkkinen's McLaren needing 40kg of ballast to be legal because of the development in composites, the next logical step would be the chassis reinforcement.

[@nope.c]

Gosh, I was a Schui fanatic. Breaks my heart he will never be the same. 🥺 Although F2002/04 were insane beasts, my favorite car was the F2000. Such a beautiful thing. Fragile, fast, simple.. gorgeous.

[@SiVlog1989]

Of all the championship winning Ferraris Michael Schumacher drove, to me, the most overlooked is the F2003GA. Although it won both titles, the heatwave in Europe nearly derailed Ferrari's hopes. It was in this car that Schumacher produced one of his most astonishing pole laps. In Austria, he was fast all weekend, in the Friday qualifying session, he set the fastest ever lap round what was then the A1 Ring, so would run last of all in the Saturday session to decide grid order. He was down on Kimi Raikkonen's time at the first split, but worse was to come. The back of the car stepped out on deceleration for the second braking zone on the track. He'd blown it surely? Not a bit of it! He, despite the moment, gained time on Raikkonen in the second sector and by the end of the lap, he was faster by 0.03 seconds

[@APAT04]

Nice Schumacher hat!

[@MadeByPerspective]

Thank you!

[@filipposstavro1233]

15/18 races in 2004* Monaco, Spa and Brazil only were not won by a Ferrari that season

[@dominicbarden4436]

20 because they used it for the first two races of 2005. The F2005 was introduced in Bahrain.

[@Sean-if7rp]

@@dominicbarden4436 F2004 altered to 2005 specs is not the optimal F2004

[@filipposstavro1233]

@@dominicbarden4436 in 2004* I was very specific. You are right that they used it for the 2 opening races of 2005 tho

[@spectrelfc1152]

It irritates me seeing old F1 cars without their tobacco sponsors.

[@evangroves8614]

his eye contact throws me off so much idk why 🤣

[@trevorshort7119]

Watched this car race at Silverstone what a sound brilliant bring back the v10

[@AndyFromBeaverton]

Ferrari won 77% of races in 2002 & 2004 and people called it boring. Mercedes won 74% of races over 7 continuous years and crickets....

[@bohab787]

Are... are you... are you implying that nobody has referred to the turbo hybrid era as boring?

[@sasha44er]

Epic Video like Everytime

[@MadeByPerspective]

Thank you!

[@AgentUltimate7]

I respect your opinion, although I prefer the F2007. I'm biased towards it of course, after all I was 7 years old during the 2007 Season and was a fan of Felipe Massa, another factor is that my father actually gave me his Hot Wheels F2007.

[@jawnwane4959]

Can you do a video comparing the dominance of the F2004 vs Merc W11

[@donelmediterraneo8626]

The first thing that comes to anybody's mind when they hear the word "Formula 1" is a V10 powered red Ferrari of Michael Schumacher

[@samsonlovesyou]

The chair made me think you'd grown a mullet.

[@ChaitanyaBhat21794]

Easily my favorite F1 car ever. People keep telling F2004 was better, it certainly had faster times based on regulation changes, but relative to field domination, F2002 absolutely thrashed the field. F2004 had a lot of competition if you see race by race, F2002 almost anhilated the field. Also, the base for the 2004 design was the 2002 design, it was that revolutionary

[@elliotcrossan6290]

It really annoys me when people say that the F2004 was the greatest Ferrari. The F2002 took a higher percentage of wins and podiums, and scored more points on average, *despite the points system being less rewarding!* Great video. Great car.

[@fam.hunger5244]

That is said because of the F2004 was more perfect. Not many people know that the F2002 was not stiff enough and also had some other problems. The F2004 was just more perfect. Marc Gene says still today - this was the perfect car. The best racecar ever. Just perfect. I could now tell other stories from engineers of Ferrari i talked to, which would explain that- but the F2004 was definetely the better car from a technical perspective.

[@elliotcrossan6290]

@@fam.hunger5244 Results matter most to me. And the Mercedes W11 is probably now the most perfect F1 car of all time. But it's the fourth or fifth best Merc.

[@afoxwithahat7846]

@@elliotcrossan6290 the W11 still the most perfect Mercedes ever tho

[@elliotcrossan6290]

@@afoxwithahat7846 The W05, W06 and W07 were all more successful

[@afoxwithahat7846]

@@elliotcrossan6290 It could be because of Rosberg instead of Bottas?

[@FirstnameLastname-wy7xf]

Must have been even more boring than hybrid era

[@muhammadfarhan581]

Not as boring. Yeah they dominate but juan coulthard and kimi still fight them. also rubens while being a second fiddle (austria and indy) is not too inferior to schumi compare to bot to ham

[@FirstnameLastname-wy7xf]

@@muhammadfarhan581 ok. I don't know since I'm only guessing by results

[@aydankhaliq2967]

IMO some of the greatest F1 cars are Lotus 25 Lotus 49 Lotus 72 Maserati 250f Ferrari 312t series McLaren MP4/4 Mercedes W196r Mercedes W11 Williams FW14b Williams FW15c

[@patepulkkinenvtec2403]

F2002 was a ridicilously good car but I still think F2004 was even better. In 2002 Schumi was simply better than in 2004. He was so consistent, and even though his 2004 season was impressive, he made a couple of errors that lost him some points. Also, Barrichello was stronger in the 2004 car than in the 2002 one.

[@Ghost-hj5jy]

I think his age was catching him in 2004.

[@patepulkkinenvtec2403]

@@Ghost-hj5jy Hmmm, I don't know. It could be. He was 35 in 2004 which isn't an unusually old age to win a championship. But yeah, even though he managed to win a record breaking 13 races that year I don't think his performance that year was as impressive than in 2002. Another factor which I forgot to mention in my original comment was just how op F2004 was in pre-season testing. It took a long time for Ferrari to believe just how quick that car was, they were sure the car was missing weight, their stop watches were malfunctioning etc. because it was so much faster than any car they had built before.

[@gerogyzurkov2259]

@@patepulkkinenvtec2403 Probably the team and tires was showing the FIA going after that year. You gotta remember we had two tire manufacturers.

[@Jay-nk6dm]

great machine-driver combination. Not trying to hate on ferrari, but people seem to forget about these stats when complaining about hamiltons titles. He had similarly dominant machinery, but never so dominant that mercedes just didnt bring a new car to the next season.

[@Ghost-hj5jy]

That's cause the FIA at that time during the era 2000s era changed the regs less vs the current Turbo Hybrid.

[@nikolasnavarro4161]

Statistically, I think the MP4-4 is still more dominant than the F2002, but then again, there were more races in 2002 than 1988. Still a great debatem though...

[@Ghost-hj5jy]

Keep in mind MP4/4 had Senna AND Alan Porst. While MS was on par and maybe better than both. After all unlike Porst who failed to win a championship with Ferrari Michael Schumacher did succeded for them. You can't say the same to MS teammate. Great man and capable just wasn't championship material compared to MS was not on par with the McLaren duo either.

[@sb113.]

What about the mclaren mp4/4 it win all but one race it was one of if not the best and most dominant f1 car

[@emilekaram6094]

Both 2002 and 2004: the cars so good it shocked Ferrari 2005: the car so bad it shocked Ferrari 🤣😂

[@TheTrueBlueOne]

you forgot that schumacher finished 3rd at the 2002 Malaysian gp

[@emilekaram6094]

I think he was still in the 2001 car

[@blazeyt843]

Best car series ??

[@aaryarajmondal5532]

I would say that f2001 was also great car as it beat the competition in the next season also in the first few races.

[@emilekaram6094]

But I don't think anywhere near the other 2 monsters. However, I feel that the 1999 one was better than the 2000

[@ivaniii9707]

There is a perfect F1 car. The Alfa Romeo 158 won every race it entered and every race that season apart from Indy due to no attendance. So it has a perfect racing record for the 1950 season

[@mylo2004]

Back when formula 1 was a lot simpler

[@thekoukikid7]

How about the Malaysian Grand Prix? I can see you specifically omitted the 2002 Malaysian Grand Prix that took place in Sepang. Come on dude, Schumi was 3rd during that race

[@ApolloVIIIYouAreGoForTLI]

So then how the hell can they be so inept in 2022??

[@oxii99]

F2002 vs RB9

[@donaldsalkovick396]

Nice car but I'd say it's more about the driver than the car

[@F1Onboards.]

Hi

[@MadeByPerspective]

Hey! 👋🏽

[@mac.fk14]

And people say Lewis is better than schumi like we all know both had the best cars but just look at schumi's results

[@blas9520]

And then they say that Hamilton only won because of the car. Every champion needs a capable car and needs a strong team. Schumacher built ferrari, Hamilton built Mercedes. Once some time passes people will recognize him as one of the greats

[@sb7707]

Rory Byrne agrees with you, the F2002 is his favorite Ferrari too. He calls it near perfect too. I think you will enjoy this interview. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIGWq4Oca9alrdU

[@emilekaram6094]

Yes Marc Gene would disagree with Rory Byrne 😁

[@AA-ks7bo]

since you love both ferrari aren't verstappen, the 2021 season must be really easy for you. ferrari win? happy! verstappen win? happy!

[@_hanz73]

I really want to see Ferrari winning this year's championship! I hope they can do it! *edit: RIP NEVERMIND, LMAO

[@xynostasos9022]

More iconic than the Vodafone logo is the Marlboro branding. Is it a new political correctness thing to kind of "forget" that tobacco liveries actually existed back then and they were awesome?

[@tazionuvolari8142]

So that why F2002 faster than F2004 in F1 2017

[@tylersamuel5021]

Mercedes’ W11 is the best f1 car ever and it’s not even close

[@christianschollaert2764]

2004 was the best

[@sbinnalaracingdivision]

best one was f2014

[@ryanzutell1423]

Merc W11? Lol cmon

[@almeidareiasify]

I think the F2004 its a better lokking car.

[@Williamgamerchannel]

Schumi and lulu would be an unbeatable duo