PlayStation 5 Pro vs $700 & $1600 Gaming PC

[@haseebe]

0:17 "One is going to be similarly priced to the PS5 Pro at 700 dollars, the other one is going to be 'slightly above'." Meanwhile, the title says "$1600 Gaming PC" going from "$700". I think by slightly above you mean more than double.

[@princegroove]

@@haseebe Clickbait, obviously.

[@mwtechno]

my apologies for the terminology.

[@mefirstplease3676]

Ratchet and clank fidelity mode can be in the 50’s most of the time which is honestly quite impressive at that fidelity.

[@VariantAEC]

In the end, it looks like you've only proven what the console gamers have been saying for some time now. PC is way more expensive. What the PC gamers aren't saying is that it takes more time to get your rig situated to play games, and updates are much more annoying on PC, though that can be a double-edged sword as some games are left behind on console in a terrible state, though the same still happens for some PC titles anyway.

[@leonprez231]

You can get between 70 to 120fps on ps5 if you have a vrr display for spiderman.

[@aldworth33]

You should have gone for a AMD card for the budget one as they always offer way more value per frame. The 6750xt you mentioned would have made it perform a decent amount better than the 3060ti, I have a 6650xt in my pc and I love it, performs great and never had any issues

[@waleedisnowagamecatspecifi1499]

Really weird and bad choices of games in this video. Where is last of us ? Where is Ragnarock? No Mans Sky? Resident Evil 4 and Village? Also Red Out and Horizon 1 is such a misplace here. Why not Horizon forbidden west?? Picking old games which are not even on enhanced list

[@nathsabari97]

It just shows PC games are scalable and you don't have to wait for a game patch which sometimes can yield worse results than a non pro ps5.

[@mefirstplease3676]

⁠@@nathsabari97That’s not a pro specific thing, you’re just describing the difference between a console and PC. If Yes, PC is scalable that’s why it’s called “Personal Computer”, and most won’t yield results better than the pro.

[@gangs0846]

Last of us, Ragnarock,... all boring trash

[@mefirstplease3676]

@@gangs0846 You can call them trash but what does that have to do with what the guys original comment? Also it’s interesting that you call two Game of the year winners “trash” but go off I guess.

[@gangs0846]

@ you mean Sonys own "PlayStation Game of the Year Awards" 😄 Congrats

[@Ansonxd]

You are testing the ps5 game, not ps5 pro, also you didn’t test the 4K 120 games like resident evil at side by side , and you didn’t mention about the HDR, ALLM and VRR, this is pc testing, not ps5 pro

[@lsnexus2080]

it'll still lose. because of how underpowered the GPU in ps5 pro is. even with all of those stuff, Ps5 pro 4k is not native at all. as you can see here, it cannot even do similar resolution details to a PC even on a 3060ti. let alone if this is 4060 that has DLSS+FrameGen, where framegen is non existent to 30 series. a 4070 in this regard isn't even using FrameGen at all. it would push the Fps further which is why that 4070 TI Super is able to do Path Tracing in Black myth wukong even at high FPS where path tracing is not even existent to PS5 pro. as for 3060Ti, it has a price similar to 4060, a 4060 would have been a better choice for FrameGen and have similar performance to PS5 pro but with better details and resolution scaling. that's just how it is. in front of 4070 Ti Super, that's just so hilariously laughable. ofc that card is expensive since the card alone is 700-800. but hell of a powerful GPU that could run 4k native as proven in the video above. something that a ps5 pro cannot even do "NATIVELY" it needs upscalers to perform. plus a ps5 pro doesn't even beat out 4060 and the base 4070 what more in this comparison which is 4070 Ti Super where it beats out a ps5 pro without even using its full potential. -you could OC a card, undervolt, or turn on that Frame Gen which pushes the FPS to higher levels. its a no contest at all.

[@mefirstplease3676]

23:39 The irony is that most of these games on the pro have the ability to have an uncapped frame-rate but for some reason you didn’t hook it up to the monitor and choose the option to unlock the frame-rate. Decent video though.

[@gamingfromjohnwayne]

Good job on video man❤

[@АндрейРачок-ы8с]

14600k and low profile cooler. Is it reasonable? 7700x just exist

[@JuiceBiker]

The biggest problem of our time is the consoles and the developers. That's where most of the budget is... Games are actually developed for consoles, but in the past it was a completely different story. It's a shame... Today you have to put a hell of a lot of money on the table for a PC and in the end it doesn't really look much better than on a Series X for $499. Of course there are differences, but are they that big? A PC is something for enthusiasts. I just don't really understand why you went for a 4070ti. A 7900xtx costs the same, delivers more and has the same options.

[@sjneow]

not sure what you mean by in the past, as far as I can remember, even before the games are multiplatform, most games comes to consoles first.

[@lsnexus2080]

its because when RT is turned on, 7900xtx goes lower Fps than a 4070tisuper by a big gap. AMD is still in progress of AI cards for 8000 series. in the comparisons, RT is included. so hope that make sense

[@blackrahk2037]

​@@sjneowThere used to be PC exclusive games like Half-Life, Crysis and Prey that where not possible on consoles at ALL. They cant do that now. Mostly because of how easy it is to pirate single player games now as opposed to back in the day. That's why Value isn't interested in making Half-Life 3 and are making a hero shooter live service game.

[@VariantAEC]

No offense, dude, but you need help with Elgato, OBS, or whatever software you use to record these comparisons, they're not good.

[@acapchoir1]

What’s that racing game at the start of the video?

[@Striker_26]

0:22 “slightly higher”💀

[@gamingfromjohnwayne]

See the big difference is the games even the same games are optimized different.

[@mainstreamgamer1300]

Can you make content which comparing ps 5 slim vs ps 5 pro in 4k 120 Hz monitor with maximum graphic setting please?

[@Linkedblade]

Stupid the ps5 gets to 4k30, i think a 5600/5500xt can do that and be at $700 easily

[@mefirstplease3676]

You do know that the fidelity modes on most of those games can have unlocked frame-rates? Also the performance modes on the pro have 4K output 🤷

[@Blackbind01]

If u got money, go for it.. regardless if its all upscaled..

[@leongaming4386]

Men ps5 pro looks better than. What u show

[@TheMichaelparis]

no way it is close to a 7800xt, 16.7TF vs 37TF and the cpu is really holding it back. A cpu upgrade would have been more meaningful than the gpu upgrade.

[@jojomendoza6761]

Overrated. It is not 7800 xt

[@quase3]

I get why these videos are still made, people want to see the comparison, but the answer is always the same, pc is better on everything except price. You can have both though, I have a ps5 in my living room and a proper gaming pc on my room, use the ps5 for stuff like sports games and to play the occasional exclusive I really want to play, everything else on pc. Even the price can be argued, over time let's say you have your pc and console for 5 years, you'll probably send up spending more overall with the console if you buy a fair amount of games, on pc you can have a vast library and spend very little.

[@johnnylawrence7509]

PLAYSTATION WINS. BROOOOO... AFTER DECADES OF PC GAMING HEADACHES AND 0 GREAT EXCLUSIVES ON PC I FINALLY SWITCHED TO CONSOLES AND COULDN'T BE HAPPIER. ⚠️⚠️⚠️PC GAMING IS DEAD⚠️⚠️⚠️... Wait... Pc has never been relevant to gaming. 🤣🤣🤣 Pc poors PC KIDDIES. 😂😂😂😂😂 🛑 ATTENTION🛑 PC LOSES.... ANY YEAR. PC: 0 Great exclusives. Misses out on numerous GOTY winners every year. Windows garage OS Bugs, viruses, crashing. Malware, shovelware, bottlenecking, troubleshooting. No physical games. No first party developers. Horrible online plagued with cheaters hackers and modders. Gimped unoptimized and late 3rd party ports. Garbage / virtually non-existent local multiplayer. Loses best graphics, art, animation, etc to consoles first party games yearly. Gigantic, loud, energy consuming towers. Hunched over desk and chair gaming on a small screen. But yeah... Go ahead and name 1 single great pc exclusive. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Vs Consoles: Numerous great exclusive games. First party titles. Physical or digital games. 2nd party exclusives. Optimized games. Exclusive games that win Best Graphics, art, animation every year. Superior online services. Ease of use. Small, quiet, energy conserving. No bugs, viruses, malware, shovelware. Blu-ray Portability. Constant innovation from d-pad, to analog, to motion controls to Dualsense. If you're gaming on a PC it's because: A. You are a child and your parents control what you play and what you play on. B. You're a foreigner (not from the USA) and hate games based on American or Western culture. C. You are poor and can't afford a luxury item like a console. D. You are on the spectrum and enjoy repetitive point and click games. E. All of the above. 😂😂 Oh, and you want to talk about visuals? Best looking games by year: 2023- Spider-Man 2 (Not on PC), Alan Wake 2. 2022- God of War Ragnorok (not on PC), Horizon Forbidden West (Not on PC), Eldin Ring. 2021- Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart (Not on PC). 2020- The Last of Us Part II ( Not on PC), Dreams (Not on PC). 2019- Death Standing (Not on PC), Control. 2018- God of War (Not on PC), Red Dead Redemption 2 (Not on PC). 2017- Horizon Zero Dawn (Not on PC). 2016- Uncharted 4 (Not on PC). Should I go on? 😂😂😂😂 Well? OH... PC DOPES. MAKE SURE YOU DON'T CHECK THAT E BOX BEFORE RESPONDING OR JUST USE "RAGE BAIT OR THE LIKE WHILE CRYING YOUR EYES OUT BECAUSE IT'S ALL YOU GOT LOSERS. 😂😂🤣🤣😆😆😆😆😆

[@freddywayne]

PS5 Pro has an RDNA 2 gpu between RX 6750XT - RX 6800 at best. And if it did have an rdna 3 gpu it would be a 7700XT at best. And Ray-Tracing isn't even in the same league as Nvidia RTX gpus.

[@leonprez231]

Rdna 2 doesn't have hardware ray tracing or a. I machine learning . So your incorrect

[@buschg7106]

My pro was honestly disappointing. More impressed with xsx

[@mefirstplease3676]

Wait, haven’t most of the first party games on the XSX launched at 30fps?

[@Max-xd1td]

You are right, just bought ps5 pro and yes it sucks more than xbox series x, to even download game is terrible, installation is very slow, damn, xbox is faster with files😢😢😢

[@mefirstplease3676]

@@Max-xd1td Return it then.

[@blackrahk2037]

​@@mefirstplease3676you know he lying, don't feed the trolls.

[@Elvento]

что и требовалось доказать... СОНИ просто обманывают игроков, выдаивая из них деньги

[@princegroove]

I have a PS5 Pro and a 14700KF paired with a MSI Gaming X 4060ti 16GB GPU, yet I enjoy them equally. I’ll always choose Intel and Nvidia PC components instead of AMD’s budget and junk components. 🫡

[@JuiceBiker]

If you always prefer Intel and Nvidia over AMD, you've unfortunately missed out on a lot. Especially when it comes to CPUs🤣

[@princegroove]

@ Trash AMD! No thanks.

[@xxmujinscxx3516]

@@princegroove the gaming companies optimize the games to work with amd over intel. You are wild calling the amd cpus trash when they have 10-30 frames over the intel chips lol. Are you new to pcs? Or are you a brand name type of guy?

[@stinkyvoet]

I'd suggest not getting all your info from userbenchmark 👍

[@princegroove]

@ I’ve built three Intel and Nvidia PCs for myself over the years; so I guess I’m an Intel and Nvidia fanboy. 😂