1st lead frigate banani chahiyethi..INS Dadagiri😂😂 aur sabko dadagiri class frigates kehna chahiye tha😅
@syscgamer89337 ай бұрын
THEN DIDIGIRI 💀
@ion82647 ай бұрын
Indian economy is too big we cant afford our navy to be so small when we depend so much on sea trade routes.There should be atleast 35+ frigates and 20+ destroyers
@vedangbarman63927 ай бұрын
not enough budget to support it
@Chiniminichaomao7 ай бұрын
Indian economy isn't too big , Paisa nahi hai Babu apne paas utna
@Naynansh177 ай бұрын
@@vedangbarman6392sahi bola bro Defence budget bht low h Indian defence forces ka
@ion82647 ай бұрын
@@warrior_singh111 niqqa ik all this sheet
@vedangbarman63927 ай бұрын
@@warrior_singh111 public chutiya hai bilkul sainiko ko haraam ka khane ki aadat pad gayi hai T90 aur T72 meii ac nahi hai summer mei it is hell
@sparklestudios20837 ай бұрын
We should build ships in larger numbers to gain economy of scale and reduce time taken for induction. At least 15 copies of a design must be built.
@kishu2227 ай бұрын
They should buy even more P-17A with different configurations. Like remove 2 RBU-6000 and install Mk45 or similar Vertical launchers for more SAMs. And we have air defence frigates.. or place more Subsonic cruise missiles etc..
@dinosutra7 ай бұрын
We need be a top 3 Navy in terms of both vessel numbers and water displacement.
@soumyajitsingha96147 ай бұрын
We already are in top 3 Navy because Indian Navy is a bluewater navy unlike regional navy of Russia and Russia is not a naval power
@abhilashyadav22747 ай бұрын
@@soumyajitsingha9614 Good joke . 😂
@soumyajitsingha96147 ай бұрын
@@abhilashyadav2274 you're a joke because there's very few people that consider Russian Navy a true Navy because they lack even a single aircraft carrier and also they lost so many ships to a nation that lacks any Navy
@soumyajitsingha96147 ай бұрын
@@zarvanali888 check wikipedia's list of Blue water Navy and Russia is not in the list
@soumyajitsingha96147 ай бұрын
@@abhilashyadav2274 Moskova was the bigger joke which got sunken by subsonic Ukrainian Neptune missile
@saras1027 ай бұрын
Not to forget this frigates r more stealthy than visakhapatnam class destroyers
@Sacrafago907 ай бұрын
Both are underpowered according to that size,better they would have been equipped with: For Delhi Class/Nilgiri Class 76mm Oto Melara 32 cells VLS for Barak 8ER 16 cells VLS for Bramhos ER 8 cells VLS for 32 VL SRSAM 2 RBU6000 replaced by 16 cells VLS for VL ASROC 2 RIM116/2 Pantsir M CIWS 2 Kashtan/Palma 2 Triple Torpedo tubes
@yashasvisingh66947 ай бұрын
Sir but there's a problem with their armament 40 missiles are far too less Even if 8 of them are Brahmos Hopefully they will get additional VLS for VLSRSAM and LR-LACM It's the same problem with P15 A and B
@theintrovert8947 ай бұрын
its frigate not destroyer...8 brahmos is more than enough
@yashasvisingh66947 ай бұрын
@vigilante3916 USA constellation class frigate has 32 Mark 41 VLS And 16 canister launched missiles and 21 RIM-116 missiles More armed than our ships There are only 32 Barak 8 air defence missiles will that be enough in face of drones?
@yashasvisingh66947 ай бұрын
@@theintrovert894They should work to integrate NASM-MR and LR for more firepower Also the bigger problem is only 32 air defence missiles which I think is not enough for drones Quad pack VLSRSAM or VSHORADS based systems is necessary
@Chiniminichaomao7 ай бұрын
@@yashasvisingh6694drones ke CIWS use hota hai , barak nahi
@yashasvisingh66947 ай бұрын
@@Chiniminichaomao AK630 is very old for that even the Russians have moved past that Not to mention there are only 2 AK630 in P17A Something like RIM-116 is required can be done by VSHORADS And VLSRSAM
@nikunjthakkar48097 ай бұрын
Comparison ,Very nicely done
@ashokcarrol627916 күн бұрын
The frigates should have 24Brahmos 290, 400, 800 km range 12 each and 64SAMs of 30,70,150,250 km range SAms . The Ak-230 must be replaced with a 10000rpm firing Ciws and RBU -6000 replaced with the 600 km range or 250 km range Antisub missile torpedoes . The bulky AESA radar needs to be built in the superstructure walls like American destroyers .
@ashokcarrol627916 күн бұрын
The destroyers must have 36SSMs and 144 SAms
@abhishekk38417 ай бұрын
Cost difference is due to brahmos missile number...
@DebasishDas-vz6qq7 ай бұрын
Any news regarding next generation destroyers ? Pls 🙏🙏🙏
@kanishkamandrawal98257 ай бұрын
Even our destoyers are underarmed
@Armyman5777 ай бұрын
Our warships are underarmed
@ChandranPrema1237 ай бұрын
They are more like Anti Ship Interceptors
@shreyadyutipati98707 ай бұрын
Our frigates and destroyers are modular in design, they have room for future missile induction as nirbhaya or brahmos 2. I have researched a lot, our nilgiri class frigates are best, better than any amrican or Chinese or western frigates, they openly acknowledge it.
@rohitb58347 ай бұрын
No
@anuragbaba5987 ай бұрын
I will still say we need more fire power.
@BB-fb2uh7 ай бұрын
But our Kamorta class anti submarine corvettes at 3400 tonnes are really underpowered.....they don't have any offensive anti ship capabilities whereas smaller corvettes like Sigma class are multi role in nature
@tushars40387 ай бұрын
All 7 frigates launched but none of them commissioned ?
@srfsongs30417 ай бұрын
Navy planing next gen p17 b frigate with 64 vls same types 32 on front and 32 on aft displacement of 8200 tonnes
@ADARSHKUMAR-vp9cy7 ай бұрын
We need atleast 190+ warships
@suddu_shetty7 ай бұрын
So can we integrate more brahmos to this frigates
@srfsongs30417 ай бұрын
Your information is wrong Nilgiri class frigate Displacement 6700 tonnes 7200 tonnes full load vs vishakapatnam class 6800 tonnes 7400 tonnes full load Nilgiri class cost 6400 crore per unit not 4000 crore
@srfsongs30417 ай бұрын
P17 b frigate have 32 vls for brahmos and lrlacm
@danishjaved4547 ай бұрын
Indian Navy can make a ship which has only a lot of missiles for every use
@beninvijay7 ай бұрын
Its time for small weapons, Russia couldn't use big ticket ships because even small water drones created heavy damage
@krishanpathak49897 ай бұрын
Why only 7? Why not 11 or 13. Same with destroyer Why 5 or 6 go for batch of 11.at a time. Its time we build some cruisers as well.
@ashwarysrivastava82657 ай бұрын
It still does not make sense just to save bit of budget. 😅
@Bishal_Goswami7 ай бұрын
I mean they only reduced 8 missiles right? Why they did that🙂
@Naynansh177 ай бұрын
Chinese type 55A destroyers ki price 900M dollars aur Vishakhapatnam class destroyers 1 billion sse jaya k h with less firepower
@viveksorathiya20577 ай бұрын
They build more ships than we can dock
@jayeshborole4037 ай бұрын
1 type 055 puri indian navy ko duba dega ye fact hai bcoz usme kuch jyada hi firepower hai including hypersonic missiles
@vishalchaudhary27107 ай бұрын
Zyada order Dene de Capital cost distribute ho jata hai aur humare subsystems imported hai. Chini log swadesi Saman banate hai
@abhilashyadav22747 ай бұрын
Chinese have a very extensive manufacturing experience most of which is gained in the last 3-4 decades. They know how to efficiently source the materials and manufacture things at low cost in small amount of time in large numbers. Just because things are domestic doesn't mean they would automatically be less expensive than imports.
@Naynansh177 ай бұрын
Bro Nilgiri class frigates ki price kitni hogi kya ye Project 15B destroyers se jayda costly honge
@jayeshborole4037 ай бұрын
half of destroyers
@Optimumprime_7 ай бұрын
Project 18 destroyers ?
@Naynansh177 ай бұрын
Indian NAVY k pass Underwater vessel bht low h
@kunalsinha23557 ай бұрын
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳
@shreyadyutipati98707 ай бұрын
@DefenceMatrix Bhai tum Physics wallah se sponsorship le lo
@honeybeee237 ай бұрын
Project 18😊
@piyushsinha13947 ай бұрын
Plz comments on this big brother
@pritamkumarmallick8425Ай бұрын
Why india always poses as TOOTHLESS TIGER.......even our plans always seems like this.
@theintrovert8947 ай бұрын
tell me why we re so obssessed with light equipment..for army its understandable..but why for air force..we have LCA Tejas 1,2 .. LCH, LUH, LAH..even AMCA is medium ctegory..why we dont induct or produce heavy figheters
@swastik67057 ай бұрын
Bruh seriously? We have SU -30 in huge numbers and our main enemy is china in the Himalayan reason so we need light weight fighters it's our requirement
@ion82647 ай бұрын
Faltu main gyan chod raha bhai thoda to research kar le
@Mayank_and_Devansh_jadav7 ай бұрын
@@swastik6705 right
@theintrovert8947 ай бұрын
@@swastik6705 ... bro su30 will be retired and old one..and himalayan is 6000m .. and jets can easily reach 15km .. our fighters will able to carry less weight compared to other...AMCA internal capacity is 1500 kg...heavy fighter has its own advantages..more range more endurance range