我以前都聽聞系性格既分類中,Big-5係有最多研究支持的。想問系,知否而家黎睇(自從201X年左右爆發既replication crisis in psychology之後),Big-5個可信程度係咪都仲係算高?(抑或暫時係少人去check呢題所以無乜野講?) [因為我自己都睇過d以前好出名、被cited過數千次的「經典論文」(通常都係因為同我個人經驗/我心目中的理論不相符),有d paper我都發現根本唔可靠、又或者己經有其它人踢爆佢地點解唔可靠、或是別人重覆實驗加上解釋舊paper點解唔可靠;另有至少2份papers,我睇完後分別好激動地系自己個notes度分別註明為垃圾/黐線paper/outrageous----因為份份都浪費了我幾個鐘時間去讀。我真係好激氣的(因為我讀paper時速度比較慢)。但亦都變成而家但凡睇心理學書,都會睇得零舍小心,包括好多時打係旁邊打個『?』及註明『唔知是否可信?』(通常都係因為同我既想法差好遠所以懷疑)]
@tktstudent2 жыл бұрын
天光傾到天黑!
@pansytam002 жыл бұрын
Any contextual and cultural diff of the lexical uses to describe people ‘s characters ?
@TreeholeHK2 жыл бұрын
Yes, some scholars do posit that Chinese do have a different personality sketch compared to Westerners and developed the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Whereas some other development added the Honesty-Humility (H) dimension, making up the HEXACO (BIG6 test)