Video title in 2025: Crew capsule development Video title in 2035: Mars crew vehicle landing test
@tomthetoaster80046 жыл бұрын
CubeCraftGalaxy Honestly though, I think that’s an accurate time frame for NASA
@KesslerSpaceIndustries6 жыл бұрын
Are you an SFS KZbinr?
@sebastianwaitzer96136 жыл бұрын
C’mon that’s way to late
@cubecraftgalaxy59736 жыл бұрын
@@KesslerSpaceIndustries hey ive seen you before. And yes
@theholderscock6 жыл бұрын
Hello fellow sfs player
@AJ_Jones198XAD6 жыл бұрын
Every time you upload a video, I watch it, then play KSP for the next 8 hours...
@kilovian3536 жыл бұрын
Lmao same
@lalithchandramusipatla14806 жыл бұрын
Even I do😊
@vinsan986 жыл бұрын
Same 😂😂
@2003vito6 жыл бұрын
same
@kazsmaz6 жыл бұрын
Try KOS bro. You'll not regret it. It's a mod for KSO
@BPSspace6 жыл бұрын
SMASH that like button if you also spent an irresponsible amount of money on solenoid valves at 2am last monday
@andrewgamer3cami3926 жыл бұрын
Done! Not selenoids but close... LIKE!
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@tinatarsia6457 whut can u explain better plz
@peermoritz65476 жыл бұрын
I do this every Monday....... Off course.
@hollowworld71376 жыл бұрын
Do you have a list of scheduled launches and rockets
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@tinatarsia6457 I think i get it a bit now XD
@sepposyXIV6 жыл бұрын
Phoenix and InSight Mars landers used pulsed thrusters for landing, so pwm should work just fine.
@DerKrawallkeks6 жыл бұрын
What about using propane? It is at about 8bar at room temperature and it will expand 270 times during the transition to gas form. This could allow you to reduce the size of the pressurized tank to a very small tank of 100ml or so. The biggest issue in this case is the cooling of the propane when transitioning to gas form. Usually if you let out gasious propane from the top of a tank of liquid propane, the liquid itself cools down, which reduces pressure and the ability to turn into a gas. This could be overcome by keeping the propane a liquid right up to the valve, and basically spraying out liquid propane. Then the absorbed heat energy will not come from the stored rest of liquid, but from the air surrounding the spray of liquid propane. Another option to overcome the cooling issue, that could increase performance greatly, is the heating of the liquid propane. In this case, you'd choose the simple tank that feeds gasious propane to the thrusters. Now that a big part of the cooling takes place at the stored rest of liquid propane, a single small propane burner can be used at the tank itself to keep the pressure high. If you think about 100ml * 270, that's 27 liters (athmospheric). That's the equivalent of a 2,7L (air) tank at 10 bars. I'm sure a 100ml tank is much lighter than a 2,7ml tank (both would hold 10 bars for comparable performance).
@cloudvea6 жыл бұрын
OwO a scientist
@Hope4Today92 жыл бұрын
Me like!
@Thee_Sinner6 жыл бұрын
Take a drink every time he adjusts his sleeve.
@BPSspace6 жыл бұрын
RIP
@mihailazar24876 жыл бұрын
Words CAN NOT describe JUST HOW SATISFYING that sound is OMG I could listen to that ALL DAY Best type of ASMR
@ercc9236 жыл бұрын
This is incredibly interesting, well produced video and I appreciate your engagement into making us learn and understand the difficulties and solutions of advanced model rockets!
@StefsEngineering6 жыл бұрын
For the air storage, it may be interesting to look into cylinders for airguns, those are usally quite small and compliment the shape of the rocket quite well. you may even have enough room around the cylinder for the valves and other required equipment. (smallest paintball air tank is around 350cc, a pistol air cylinder can be found in 68cc (3000psi)
@joshuabarosin7795 жыл бұрын
Could invest in making custom COPV’s, Air Command Water Rockets used fiberglass to create a custom pressure vessel
@potatopobobot42314 жыл бұрын
Cool story bro. Maybe try watching more than 2 minutes of the video before commenting.
@LawrenceHuot6 жыл бұрын
Joe your freaking me out! RCS?!?! I just got into model rocketry as a result of your videos. I'm loving the old school rocketry but you my friend ..... I can't wait for what you are bringing to model rocketry. It's a hobby that you are at the leading (front of the line) edge of. Keep it up!!!
@edwardcolhoun63606 жыл бұрын
This is a really neat new direction for your projects
@Galyxr6 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you're getting into high power rocketry. This is where things get much more interesting...
@radon12216 жыл бұрын
your work is such an inspiration dude, the amount of work you do and the way we see it as a scaled down version of actual rockets is super fascinating
@AirCommandRockets6 жыл бұрын
Very Cool! Why not make part of the air frame the pressure chamber rather than a separate tank? Water rocketeers have been doing that for years ;)
@hamandbeef6 жыл бұрын
This is seriously amazing. Everything you’ve done is just so inspiring to me.
@willempaternotte40714 жыл бұрын
You can buy small co2 canisters, used for quickly pumping up a bike tyre. You can maybe use them for smaller scale rockets.
@kanski93 жыл бұрын
Miniature scale RCS is probably the coolest thing i've seen this year.
@jakn51426 жыл бұрын
This is so impressing! I just love all the technical details u get in these videos! Keep up the great work
@MarcusHouse6 жыл бұрын
This is amazing! The RCS with give you a lot more control. Next stop... Grid Fins. :)
@OrionAerospace6 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to see the RCS in flight! :D
@trainorace6 жыл бұрын
Absolutely stellar! Can’t wait to see this develop further. Keep rockin Joe!!
@pileguru37456 жыл бұрын
In your next upgrade, the RCS thruster section should be a shouldered/full body width center section. This way you slip it in a 74mm tube that is the rest of the propulsion section, and an upper rocket section can slip over the top. As discussed below, when you get to roll control, you just use a smaller orifice for the jets and accomplish vastly reducing the thrust and still operate at the same pressure as the other two axis. This allows you to build a complete system that you can put in the middle of an existing rocket for testing.
@toboterxp81556 жыл бұрын
2:35 I really hope scuba tanks don't contain CO2
@williamrose34136 жыл бұрын
You have to breath part oxygen and part other gas because oxygen is toxic so...
@toboterxp81556 жыл бұрын
I will have to disagree with you on that. Quite some spaceships used pure oxygen atmospheres. The Apollo mission for example, until the oxygen set the craft on fire in Apollo 1. Wich was a manned, so the atmosphere was probably not lethal, at least while not on fire.
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@williamrose3413 if oxygen is toxsic we would all be dead
@williamrose34136 жыл бұрын
@@krijndees Oxygen is toxic when in high concentrations rather than the 20% we breathe
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@williamrose3413 we dont even have 20% and a firefighter told me that there is 100% pure oxygen in their tanks but not licuid and now you again say oxygen is toxic ITS NOT it even is better for us to have more oxygen if you look like 1 mil years ago there where much bigger creatures that are small today the day cause there is less oxygen so STOP saying that *oxygen is toxic*
@henryD93636 жыл бұрын
For roll control why don't you simply reduce the diameter of the nozzles proportionately. This would significantly improves the off/on/off timing that you have to achieve. In other words, you would have more time to play with to achieve the desired delta-p as applied to angular momentum.
@neiljudell14376 жыл бұрын
Be careful with PWM on the valves.... It tends to create excess wear, and can even cause stiction. And in many valves the PWM frequency needs to be too low to be useful.....
@Husker54546 жыл бұрын
Remember to factor in the weather and temperature when moving to CO2 . Temp effects CO2 which is why compressed air is more popular in stuff like paintball .
@Phil-tl6ln6 жыл бұрын
If you want to do the throttling (floating valve) control of the solenoid, automotive engine management systems sometimes do this for idle speed control and turbo boost pressure regulation. A flywheel diode is essential and typically they are modulated at 20hz with a 15-85% PWM control region. Because it is impossible to know the valve position you need incorporate this inside your closed loop control somehow, whether it be an internal control loop with an angular speed target, or something else, I have no idea :S.
@kalamazoopermaculture64056 жыл бұрын
On your CAD, model the sharp 90 degree in the fluid flow will induce turbulence and cause a massive amount of energy loss... A smoother transition i.e. a 1/4 of a donut would be worth a reprint. Also loved the nerd out during the test. Industrial peroxide passing through a catalyst in the future??....
@tombratfred31026 жыл бұрын
Bear in mind that it also needs to be manufactured with reasonable ease.
@MoneyManden6 жыл бұрын
Watching netflix but sees a new video from BPS.Space. It's called prioritising.
@andylaweda6 жыл бұрын
Joe, I love your content. Great to see you on TMRO recently! Forgive me please if I can't support you on patreon while supporting Tim Dodd (day job) and TMRO ($deity's work) and paying my insane UK mortgage. With you in spirit Sir!
@gerardnll26 жыл бұрын
You are like a mix between actual macaulay culkin and Elon musk
@vovanikotin6 жыл бұрын
Outdated joke. Lets back to science.
@superbmediacontentcreator6 жыл бұрын
Have you thought of using the nitrous oxide capsules used to make whip cream (among other things)?. they are cheap, small, light and readily available. Further, the holders and valves are already available all over. This can also be scaled up when your system is perfected.
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
Thats a canister not nitrous but ok those small canisters are used in some airsoftguns too so he said it already
@mariohernandez11116 жыл бұрын
@@krijndees It's definitely nitrous oxide.
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@mariohernandez1111 it could be that wer talking about something else but i dont think the one your talking about doesnt have nitrous that would be higly flammeble but idk what type of canisters your talking about but airsoft cannisters are Co2
@mariohernandez11116 жыл бұрын
@@krijndees maybe you should check out your facts before talking. Nitrous oxide is used for whipped cream.
@krijndees6 жыл бұрын
@@mariohernandez1111 i just said i dont know what cartridges go in there but i know airsoft guns use co2 cartridges
@klab39296 жыл бұрын
Next> Liquid-Fueled Rocket Engines(LFRE) Development :)
@jhrch43896 жыл бұрын
Lukas Bendiksen REALLY hard but I’d love to see that
@klab39296 жыл бұрын
@@jhrch4389 Making one is actually fairly simple, making it efficient is an hole other thing... but would be really awesome to watch
@Chris-it4fe6 жыл бұрын
@@klab3929 it's not fairly simple, it hasn't even been done yet, it's really complicated
@adamrezabek94693 жыл бұрын
@@Chris-it4fe to be exact, it has been done, just not at model scale. And now that I think about it, small manuvering thrusters (like Draco) are model scale rocket engine. But it certainly is not easy
@Chris-it4fe3 жыл бұрын
@@adamrezabek9469 wow, that's an old comment. Yeah it has been, but I meant an efficient engine which would take a large amount of time and money to get a prototype
@MastaBlastaZDusta6 жыл бұрын
Have you considered using propane/butane instead of compressed air? Sure it seems dangerous at first but their compressibility is much better, and you could store a lot more gas allowing for more time to run your RCS. Also, maybe some clever design for electronic firing, and an optimised nozzle and you could literally fire them off :D But seriously, combustible gases are sometimes used in some hydraulic applications where the ability to store a lot of pressure is important. BTW all the best to you from Polish Synchrotron Light Source, I do have my own share of "space like" technologies here :)
@JustJackOnYoutube6 жыл бұрын
I like it very much that you use metric to explain this, over time I've gained a decent understanding of imperial by now but it's so much easier to relate to metric, thanks.
@sssssssssss4406 жыл бұрын
Great work dude! Excited to see its development
@Thorgon-Cross6 жыл бұрын
This would work great if hooked up to the 300psi i use to pressurize my propellant tanks. Great that you guys are creating "standardized" control boards for amateur high power rocketry.
@user-fj4mb5jh8o6 жыл бұрын
Have you considered precisely controlling the landing thrust by using 2 opposite placed motors that can swing out(in opposite directions, so the rocket remains stable) to reduce thrust and swing back in to increase thrust?
@spacedoge35086 жыл бұрын
The two motor's thrusts may be different
@user-fj4mb5jh8o6 жыл бұрын
@@spacedoge3508 but you would be able to precisely control their thrust by vectrloeing them in or out, but vectoring them in or out would create a yaw force on the rocket. I guess this design wouldn't really work, it was just an idea.
@user-fj4mb5jh8o6 жыл бұрын
@Matthew Hutchinson the inefficiency is not really a problem, these are model rockets after all. You could solve the problem of a motor burning out too quickly by designing the trajectory so that the rocket lands by the time the motors burn out, or you could point the remaining motor through the cg of the rocket. The main problem with this idea is that if the motors thrust curves were different, you would have to point them out at different angles to compensate, which would create a yaw force on the rocket.
@spacedoge35086 жыл бұрын
@@user-fj4mb5jh8o nice idea tho
@spacedoge35086 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be cool if it had retractable multicopter arms to land?
@labratmatt73276 жыл бұрын
I'm sure your neighbors love that thruster sound. Can't wait to see this get off the ground!
@StefsEngineering6 жыл бұрын
For lower weight parts you could look into pneumatic RC retract components. Cool project! Looking forward to the next video! I'm not sure about the maximum operating pressure of those systems though, may be too low and not enough flow
@ukwerna6 жыл бұрын
brilliant stuff, as always. Also - its important to chill, and imho, smoke, to counteract any artificial pressure..
@krcnz6 жыл бұрын
Glad to see you back Joe!!
@tomgeorge37266 жыл бұрын
Great video, keep going. I like the way you challenge the different control systems and practically demonstrate them. You need something like a spare tyre to act as an air reservoir to give you longer testing time. The link to Charlie doesn't appear to work.
@larsbressers14026 жыл бұрын
Are you f*king shitting me. Yesterday when I went to bed I thought about making the exact same mechanism and next thing I see in the morning is this. Amazing
@Junon156 жыл бұрын
YEAH!!!! NEW BPS SPACE VIDEO!! Which is what I said out-loud, followed by strange looks from my wife.
@swistak02206 жыл бұрын
I knew that you will do thad eventually. Love your work. Have fun improving it!
@i_Hally6 жыл бұрын
Nice work. Keen to see it's development
@SamwiseGamgy476 жыл бұрын
You’re killing it man. Keep going.
@Lie12345678916 жыл бұрын
I would be careful with using pwm to control relays as they contain moving parts. Maybe go for some solid state relays if so. Also make sure to put the solenoids far away from any delicate electronics because of magnetic interference, and use filters on the power. Are the thrust vector control and RCS working isolated from each other? Could be beneficial with some sort of common control strategy using LQR etc. Awesom video, keep up the good work!! 👍👍
@sciencegaming66756 жыл бұрын
Nice to get this video in my notifications!
@sciencegaming66756 жыл бұрын
and congrats with the RCS!
@Gehr966 жыл бұрын
7:05 Why are you using psi instead of Pascal? It's a little bit confusing tbh. Translation for others that are as confused as me: "I'm probably going to use a paintball sized tank at around 5.5 to 6.2 MPa which is then regulated down to between 0.7 and 1.4 MPa for the actual thruster ports. And the roll thrusters will be regulated down to 350 kPa to 700 kPa."
@vlogsbyrow6 жыл бұрын
"If you're just trying to be practical, you shouldn't be flying model rockets in the first place." Joe's career summed up in one sentence.
@StuHolmes6 жыл бұрын
Well done 👍🏻 Joe - great bit of engineering
@0siiris6 жыл бұрын
Everything you do amazes me!
@happyfarm11606 жыл бұрын
Well that's what I wanted to see, this should help you to make your first successful landing!
@corkymork6 жыл бұрын
How about using water and pressurized air as RCS propellant: think water rockets! Plastic soda bottles can hold 100 + psi. Or maybe reaction wheels to control pitch and yaw?
@MaxJ3456 жыл бұрын
How do you manage to keep track of such complexity? It must be jarring to have to juggle the project as a whole and dealing with all the technical details of each module!
@nighthawxx78886 жыл бұрын
I love your creativity!
@Astroditty6 жыл бұрын
I'm sure you've already looked into it but I could see CO2 canisters (airsoft) working super well with your smaller rockets.
@WeatherWorld6 жыл бұрын
Amazing video!! Do you plan to make a larger Echo-like vehicle with thrust vector control & Reaction control systems combined?
@TLout46756 жыл бұрын
You should be able to reduce the weight by using a bladder system or use a section of the air frame to pressurize and hold the air. You should also be able to buy lighter weight or make your own air solonoids. If you pulse the valves it also uses less average current. Not sure of the cost but ultralife sold a gel type flexible battery you can form to the inside curvature of the rocket that is lighter. The battery and controller most likely going to be the most weight.
@PROSCO_in_Space6 жыл бұрын
Love it. Thanks for all your vids.
@DrewB01196 жыл бұрын
Another awesome video! Just want to let you know how much of an inspiration you have been to me, and to keep trying even if you fail. If you are reading this I hope you have an awesome day!! :)
@sunnyworld21116 жыл бұрын
I love your videos. I hope i will see your first rocket in space soon. Big admiration from SLOVAKIA!!
@moazelsayed60586 жыл бұрын
"Hey Alexa... Why isn't joe asking you anymore? Are you guys not talking?"
@doolittlegeorge6 жыл бұрын
Actually if you just launch the vehicle your 2 months become 2 minutes. I think the high speed filming and then slo-mo replay is what provides the near totality of any answers to any questions that may arise. "Only a question of $$$" now. Put together a good accounting spread sheet and do an IPO or funding round in San Fran and New York.
@mamadoudiallo76906 жыл бұрын
Good luck, you're doing a good job.
@greg94086 жыл бұрын
Dude, these videos are so cool
@ElectricWheelz6 жыл бұрын
Given that your rocket will stay in the atmosphere, how would the energy/kg compare to using a drone controller, battery and four small props to achieve the same thing? I guess you would need to minimise the drag caused by the props but it might be offset by the weight savings?
@joflo59504 жыл бұрын
I love the Idea! Actually, I am thinking of using cold gas thrusters in a project of my own, but I am not sure whether the force will be sufficient. How did you calculate the Force of your own Thrusters?
@MarcStollmeyer6 жыл бұрын
What about using a little bb gun co2 cartridge? Very light weight, just needs a valve that can trigger and detrigger within milliseconds (so a regulator isn’t necessary). Also, could you show us what valves you used in more detail?
@XrollhaX6 жыл бұрын
Do you have to use that shape for the tubes to release the air? I watched a math video about using isochronos curves to make balls drop faster. It could make those jets release faster.
@ApacheFPV4 жыл бұрын
You should definitely look into machining your own small pieces, I keep picturing this surrounded by those small round mono prop tanks on KSP, just miniaturized lol
@hedgehogchaser24946 жыл бұрын
I’m convinced you are the coolest guy on KZbin. And you look like Musk.
@kianhoppe68816 жыл бұрын
Just finished watching the video! Great video as always(quality over quantity). Glad to see your RCS system come together and to have great success. I would like to ask one question though. Has Scout D been scrapped or is it still a work in progress? Again glad to see one of your videos as it always brightens my day!
@BPSspace6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Kian! Scout D is sitting on the pad, ready to go. Launching it in a few weeks to test some new flight software!
@kianhoppe68816 жыл бұрын
@@BPSspace That is great to hear thank you!
@wsshambaugh6 жыл бұрын
PWM is basically the same as having a high enough flight software frame rate, I don’t think you need to get fancy here. I’d also be surprised if you could cycle to solenoids fast enough to get a rate much more than the software refresh, so the benefit of pwm would be marginal.
@szeperator16496 жыл бұрын
Can you make some more technical videos which show the math and programming? Really interested in that part
@infofrancois56086 жыл бұрын
Congratulations Joe, that's a great new idea. Will be perhaps better to use proportionnal small Rc valve type with Rc servo actionners. The answer will be proportionnal and you will save a lot of compressed air and weight for same result. Will be also much lighter and efficent. Go direct to simplicity. Why designing heavy when you can do it light...
@deldrise91696 жыл бұрын
So cool, congratulations.
@robertvonkulig8016 жыл бұрын
Silly question - why not a denser medium or working fluid like water? More mass = more thrust per discharge and maybe less pressurising gas??
@robertvonkulig8016 жыл бұрын
But wouldn't cold water be better than cold gas? I know exhaust would be slower but the mass would be much higher - what am I missing here? Cheers for chatting.
@robertvonkulig8016 жыл бұрын
Humph! Sounds counter initiative to me especially as he is talking high pressures already....I'll have to play with this. All the best.
@droezjjj39276 жыл бұрын
How? Why? Why are you so smart? Why are you so cool?
@enigma25365 жыл бұрын
He is Elon
@cesarrosatti12114 жыл бұрын
Hi, great video right here. I wanna ask where to look for posibly reading about the electronic part for the RCS. I want to build one for my final proyect at university next year. Greetings from Argentina!
@r621446 жыл бұрын
Hey man. Theses videos are amazing. I’m currently 17, about to be 18 and plan to go to college for mechanical and aerospace engineering. I am fluent in solidworks, and have a really creative mind that is capable of great things. Are there currently any job openings, or possibly future job openings? If so, I’d be interested
@bradley35496 жыл бұрын
When you say paintball tank at ~800psi - are you talking high pressure air, or Co2? The gas volume and weight will vary significantly. If Co2, plan on something that can deal with phase change energy or you'll be freezing up everything.
@dewexdewex5 жыл бұрын
Would it be possible to build a lightweight composite pressure vessel to contain the exhausted energy from a black powder motor within a rocket? If so, would a control system to release this be practicable, or would the exhaust particulates cause too many problems in valves and nozzles?
@guillaumespecht48376 жыл бұрын
I love what you do! + do you think spacex would be interested in sponsoring you and your company (to build more spacex rockets or any other ones)? Keep doing what you do!
@amaljerry53736 жыл бұрын
Your projects are crazier than ksp!!
@puuspace74776 жыл бұрын
Hey Joe! Ever since I discovered your channel, I have been very interested in all of these amazing things you are working on. And I was was wondering. You were selling the Signal R2 for a while, but will you sell more parts? Possibly the landing legs, and other components. I am really interested in your Echo landing tests, and I think it would be awesome if you could sell some more of the components and parts you are making.
@YukonK95 жыл бұрын
Joe you forgot to put the Thug Life when charlie started welding the 2 disks together
@munzlp6 жыл бұрын
We almost reached 50k let's go!
@kyleeames82296 жыл бұрын
You can probably reduce weight and get more control authority/more RCS burn time if you use propellant grade hydrogen peroxide with silver catalysts. Lower pressure, thinner tanks; the advantages are numerous.
@kyleeames82296 жыл бұрын
If you can’t acquire propellant grade h2o2, the use of some kind of chemical gas generator with a downward pointed bleed system (more thrust) may also be a good idea. I don’t know how easy it is to get pure/nearly pure hydrogen peroxide. It’d need to be about 95%.
@calistohuettich6 жыл бұрын
It sounds awesome.
@tsmspace6 жыл бұрын
Have you considered using a Betaflight flight controller for any of these trials?? I feel like if you used a Betaflight FC you would find the board is very well equipped,,, and you MIGHT even be able to use Betaflight.
@tsmspace6 жыл бұрын
I think FPV is a big future for model rocketry, , with a variety of applications for example, hovering over a landing pad, flying laterally, or even racing,,,, and can't help but think that a top quality FPV flight controller might just be also the best thing for rocketry.
@nucspartan3216 жыл бұрын
Joe can you make a video of what classes you suggest we take in uni to learn the main skills you have?
@pinochet33176 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah this is awesome!!!!
@guatagel24546 жыл бұрын
Nice work, thank you!
@simonyun18836 жыл бұрын
You can use compressed helium gas in a custom made aluminum air tank to reduce mass.... not a science person, but interested into what ur doing :)
@silvialuch92552 жыл бұрын
I have a question tho: why do the rcs engines produce a white trail in space? Shouldn't the gas be invisible in the void?
@qsdqsdqsdqsdqsdsdqsdqsdqsd84446 жыл бұрын
that's really sick
@OriginalAntbox4 жыл бұрын
Have you though about injecting alcohol in to a small venturi nozel with a white hot glow plug? (To expand gas not ignite)