We've come full circle: once people called aircraft carriers "islands that move" now people call islands "natural aircraft carriers".
@LoisoPondohva Жыл бұрын
It's kinda weird lol. Each time i hear that phrase my brain goes "so... an airbase?"
@JasperKlijndijk Жыл бұрын
Unsinkable, unmovable aircraft carrier
@ExplosiveLandmine Жыл бұрын
@@JasperKlijndijkuntil it’s nuked
@thorgot911 Жыл бұрын
@@JasperKlijndijkoh the US can sink an island, and they have before in the past.
@VChong1991 Жыл бұрын
@@ExplosiveLandmineICBMs can be intercepted. Hypersonic missles could not be intercepted. You have no hypersonic missles 🤭
@Bigdog5400 Жыл бұрын
Fun historical fact, one of the main reasons the PLA couldn’t pursue the ROC during their retreat to Taiwan was because the ROC retained greater control over the Chinese Navy. Following the ROC’s retreat, the PLA in China didn’t have a functioning navy, as the ROC had essentially “stolen” it.
@TheGodfather4695 Жыл бұрын
Mhm that makes sense. Thanks for info.
@namantherockstar Жыл бұрын
USA inspires me.. My parents said if i get 70K followers They'd buy me a professional camera for recording..begging u guys , literally Begging..
@blazing_pyro67 Жыл бұрын
Thanks that's very important information that got left out. I was wondering exactly that so I came to the comments thankfully it was the 1st comment I read. K
@jukeboxfandango Жыл бұрын
@@namantherockstar - someone's really desperate to get their channel monetized I see
@stvdagger8074 Жыл бұрын
There was also the Battle of Hainan. In addition to retreating to Taiwan, about 200,000 RoC troops retreated to the Island of Hainan, which is just East of Vietnam. In 1950, the Communist regime invaded that island, using more than 300 junks to move troops across the strait. Although the RoC ships and aircraft inflicted about 4,000 casualties on the communist troops, as the strait was much more narrower than the one between Taiwan and the mainland, they could not stop the majority of the troops getting ashore. The RoC troops had to evacuate or surrender. While this was successful, Mao and his Generals realized that the wider strait and the likelihood of intervention by the US Navy meant that using an extemporized fleet of junks would probably fail to invade Taiwan.
@_monolithic_ Жыл бұрын
Take a drink every time RLL uses some form of the words "massively," "vastly," or "dramatically." Godspeed.
@CorePathway Жыл бұрын
Do I look like a Russian General to you? I’d be dead!
@xtremeyoylecake Жыл бұрын
I’d be in the hospital for my blood alcohol level being too high!
@kennethmadsen6474 Жыл бұрын
I don't have that much alcohol at hand
@hairyneil Жыл бұрын
@@kennethmadsen6474 me either and I'm a distillery
@eriks8382 Жыл бұрын
“You see…”
@Fede-z7d7 ай бұрын
It’s crazy the amount of free high quality videos, this channel it’s at my top along with science channels like Vsuace & Veritasium
@kaizenyasou69637 ай бұрын
Yep
@ScootsMcPoot4 ай бұрын
This is all bs do not believe half of these channels. It's all propaganda
@robertamann20934 ай бұрын
not free our taxpayer dollars pay for this CIA sponsored NGO, and others like it. you are listening to AI voice and content, pretty slick but fake none the less genius 😅
@danielrittscher4564 ай бұрын
Simon whistler has some great stuff as well
@rechiecanonigo3800 Жыл бұрын
As a citizen living in the Philippines, this is scary AF but all true. The research to make this video especially the Philippine related parts of the video are all extremely accurate.
@joeycarmona2317 Жыл бұрын
Do you think, in your opinion, the fear of war gets worse as the years go by?
@rechiecanonigo3800 Жыл бұрын
@@joeycarmona2317 yes it will get worse as China will get more aggressive trying to overthrow Taiwan. Apparently those chips are as valuable as gold and oil combined.
@eksbocks9438 Жыл бұрын
The part that people usually forget is how a war can be dragged on as well. Kind of like the situation in Ukraine. My suggestion is make sure your home country has adequate supplies and hardware for the long haul. Wishing you guys well over there. The Philippines has always been close friends with our country. ✌️🇺🇲🇵🇭
@buzz5969 Жыл бұрын
Philippines has been Pro China a long time flip flopping back and forth taking anything from any country they can get for free, except China gives nothing for free and expects paybacks.🇺🇸✌🏻🍻
@enzoh7763 Жыл бұрын
@@eksbocks9438 ,, GOOD friends. WOULDN'T put their FRIEND'S In Danger . EVER . So who is the good friends ?
@maonutrition3177 Жыл бұрын
First time seeing the Myanmar civil war being acknowledged as a major piece of the geopolitical chess board in a video. Good job!
@DumbestDumbFool Жыл бұрын
and I just realized the genocide happening both in rohingya and palestine are the tip of US-China cold war... all these death because China want US to back off and take Taiwan back is... sad... watching this video made me realizes what superpower truly is, how much power they have in other countries, it's scary. And I always find it funny how many people hate americans, but they are the only one keeping both russia and china from invading everything around them, people really need to know politics to appreciate what US has done to keep peace but at the same time instigate all these fear, though I know for sure the "fear mongering" by Russian and Chinese governments are just tools for them to prepare for invasion and still gain the support of their citizens. Huh, writing this comment made me realize another thing huh, fear out of negligence to learn truly is the stupidest part of humans. We all are truly blessed to learn about these wider angle of politics through this channel instead of listening to "higher ups"
@thetest8777 Жыл бұрын
Same never heard of it until now 😕 Pretty sure us will seize those gas ship tankers
@Gutbomber Жыл бұрын
Well it is wedged at a place between nations and could be used as a port for the Chinese and there is like some Chinese already there.
@sbeast64 Жыл бұрын
There was a genocide, then a military coup, then a civil war, and many crimes against humanity have been committed since. Total mess =(
@Gutbomber Жыл бұрын
@sbeast64 True, always sort of having been like that. They also came into my mom's country and sacked it when my dad's country was being founded. You also got many cultures there in Burma .
@dominiksitarek1448 Жыл бұрын
I cant tell you how grateful I am for you keeping background sounds to the bare minimum, so many long from channels render themselves unwatchable/unlistenable for long periods of time due to have obnoxious sound effects for key dates and a very loud background track which does not fit the tone of the topic. Thanks again.
@DJ-GASM9 ай бұрын
Cough Infographics
@Maas_Grande9 ай бұрын
Agreed. I've tried to politely ask some creators to tone down the music, they continue, and I just can't watch.
@neoiskim9 ай бұрын
The north of the Great Wall is not Chinese territory. It was ruled by Mongols, Manchurians, and Koreans. Qin Shi Huang built the Great Wall to block the so-called Northern Orangkai. Later, China was conquered by the Mongolia and also Kim(金) Dynasty founded by descendants of korean Kim Ham-bo. Manjuwonryugo (滿洲源流考), compiled during the Qianlong Emperor of the Qing Dynasty, also reveals that the national name 金(kim) Dynasty is also derived from the family name 金(kim)of King of Silla(ancient korea). Also china wad ruled by the Manchurians for 300 years(Qing dynasty) Professor Sugihara, who presented "Japan's Bronze Age from Korea", said, "The Bronze Age came to Japan from 100 BC to AD50, the end of the Korean Bronze Age society." In Japan, the Iron Age and the Bronze Age were passed down at the same time during the Yayoi period, and the Bronze Age was used only for ancestral rites, so it seems that it went straight to the Iron Age without going through the Bronze Age." Around 100 BC ~ Ancient civilization began in Japan when Koreans landed with iron weapons in Japan, where primitive people lived during the Stone Age. Japanese history is the history of the Korean people. Japanese civic group claims, "It is the same as the annexation of Korea and Japan, reunification of East and West Germany." 2018-11-2008:30 A report was sent to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in Korea to demand "correct the fabrication of facts in Korea." // Japanese Yayoi are Koreans.. Chinese = Vietnamese gene... Korean Japanese = Siberian gene. "Our direct ancestors are members of the ancient Asian and Tungus ethnic group that migrated from Siberia in the Neolithic Age, and linguistically belong to the Altai ethnic group." "In addition to the Yayoi (Yamato people) of the Doraein line who crossed from the Korean Peninsula, there are also the Ainu lineal descendants of the Jomon people of the indigenous people of the Japanese archipelago."
@GottaBeAHero9 ай бұрын
Knowing which sounds, when to use them, and at what volume is a surprisingly rare talent I'm starting to notice. I Guess not everyone can be Redban lol
@somponesakdy8269 ай бұрын
@@neoiskimChina CCP haven’t realized that they are stuck with their greatness four thousand years history will not bring them a peace of mind. They should deal with goods or problems with friends and foes in current times. Otherwise they will kill the golden goose (USA) like they are doing right now. Thirty years they were using US DOLLARS TO DEVELOP their country and Army, because their ambition to be great empire (Mongol) they rush to kill their golden egg goose.
@Timothy.3657 ай бұрын
What an outstanding presentation! Well researched, excellent visuals, absolutely first class story telling. You make 50 minutes go by in a flash! The complexity of geopolitics is hard enough to understand, but your channel makes any university professor envious! Bravo 👏
@johannvonbabylon Жыл бұрын
I'm a big fan of your work RLL but I gotta say, your geopolitics videos are the biggest factor in me turning into a doomer.
@weepo2651 Жыл бұрын
I mean he is friends with second thought which is just the worse
@SacredCASHcow Жыл бұрын
@@supervegito2277all it takes is one or two idiots like putin to cause all this chaos
@JKroning Жыл бұрын
@@supervegito2277 A single major actor in a WWIII scenario has more conventional explosive power than all of the forces in WWII combined, I woudn't count on us surviving this Big One.
@miggybowman85 Жыл бұрын
@@spankpaddle8972 he’s covering what’s going on currently. You gotta cover the good times, and the bad times unfortunate as it is
@OiiRobbi3x Жыл бұрын
Lol try Whatifalthist he will make you implode like a black hole of doom.
@Patriotic_kurd Жыл бұрын
Real life lore never fails to scare us 💀
@steffanal-towaiji5592 Жыл бұрын
yea ture
@safalkarkey7 Жыл бұрын
Whatever gives them views..
@gabrielgyorffy1373 Жыл бұрын
i mean now he doesnt back a few years he never failed to spread misinformation just like kurzgesagt
@soundscape26 Жыл бұрын
That's what gives him the most views basically.
@gabrielgyorffy1373 Жыл бұрын
@@soundscape26 that or misinformation
@thegruffalo5383 Жыл бұрын
Note: Tindal isn’t being built from scratch. It already is (arguably) the most important and largest fighter base in Australia. The US is facilitating MAJOR base upgrades to support the stated B-52s and other visiting aircraft for joint exercises such as Pitch Black and Talisman Sabre. It’s pretty nifty ngl
@StevenCampbell1955 Жыл бұрын
Tindal is a mere speck on the world war platform. It needs to be ungraded immediately with an expansion suitable to its importance to the new geopolitical situation. Australian military forces have always been focused on defending Tasmania or possibly that big red rock in the middle, but has never been placed in an area where those military forces could project or defend Australia. A time for conscription is near and well past time that the present forces are paid a decent wage reflecting their specialities, their commitment and to attract new enlistments .What other big corporation has such poor conditions for their employees? In Australia, any young person can go to the big mines or big engineering companies to earn three times the wages for much less commitment.
@noahway13 Жыл бұрын
As an American, and like most Americans, I see Australia as our biggest ally in the world. We are siblings, from mother England. Australians seem very similar in spirit. We'll bend over backwards to help people, but once you cross a certain line... watch out. And Australia has stood shoulder to shoulder with us in *every* war and conflict and skirmish since World War II. Even in Mogadishu. No one else can make that claim. We are blood brothers.
@youandme666100 Жыл бұрын
as an australian i’m actually ashamed of our government and there level of ass kissing towards the american government, i will never fight in a war for those fools and to be honest after the australian government’s treatment of it’s citizens over the last 3-5 years i’ll be surprised if anyone here wants to stand up and defend australia on the front line of any war 😂… australian IS NOT the lucky country any more - it’s basically china, let’s not forget how the people of melbourne were treated during lock downs, let’s also not forget the lies our government have feed us over the last few years and how citizens had their human rights taken from them for not submitting to the “science” of what they pushed… the australian people are well aware of the bullshit spewing from our governments and i wouldn’t be surprised if they tried forcing a draft and found that half the draftees point there weapons at there own leaders before they do the enemy 🙏🏻
@Numinus1 Жыл бұрын
@@noahway13shouldn't England also be your biggest ally then? Just wondering
@_Da_Bois Жыл бұрын
@@Numinus1US and Australia were both colonies of the UK so I think that’s where the brotherly ally phrase came from.
@KatrinaRussell6 ай бұрын
Wow, what a most excellent production. Will definitely follow on nebula.
@NinjagoGuy416 Жыл бұрын
I KNEW he would tie in the latest Modern Conflicts episode to this one! I’m such a big fan of those documentaries, it’s literally the only reason I’m subscribed to Nebula. I would highly recommend the episode about Russia’s war with Chechnya; it’s one of my favorites 😊
@andreykov Жыл бұрын
В Чечне действовала Алькаида и это привело к боевым действиям. Точно так же, как 11 сентября Алькаида совершила теракт, который допустили спецслужбы, наблюдавшие за этими террористами. Это был повод начать войну. Изначально Алькаида была создана американскими спецслужбами для контроля территорий и для противостояния СССР. Здесь вам этого не расскажут.
@liudmylab2328 Жыл бұрын
Чеченцы знают, что 300 тысяч чеченцев на их территории убила российская армия, которая туда вторглась People of Chechnya know that 300 000 of their sityzens where killed by russian army that invaded
@RisingInTheFlesh Жыл бұрын
@@andreykovyeah, it's no secret that the West has funded terror groups to deter USSR. It's just harder to find info on it
@Luluios Жыл бұрын
@@andreykov.
@aib42 Жыл бұрын
@RealLiftLore FYI, Small mistake at 30:28, you state “Prior Nuclear Submarine deal they had made with France” in reference to the canceled Australian deal to purchase French submarines. The Australian submarine deal with France was for conventional Diesel Submarines, not nuclear powered submarines.
@markallen6433 Жыл бұрын
Super important point, it was the lack of nuclear power that made the French deal worthless for the Aussie fleet needs, which were essentially generated by Chinese posturing and aggression, and caused them to reconsider, as well as the fact that the US and UK chose to release very important sub tech to the Aussies in an effort to button up the pacific. This would have never happened without the Chinese belligerence of the last decade, but here we are.
@markallen6433 Жыл бұрын
@@DK-ei4ed no. Read the other comments in this thread.
@SPYDER9906 ай бұрын
they are now going to buy u.s nuclear subs
@nicholas_pumper_art Жыл бұрын
US military terminology: "deployed" implies impermanent presence, which could be work trips and so on. I think the word you are looking for as far as US presence in SK and Japan is "stationed", which is a large majority of those numbers you mention. These are troops, and their families, who have picked up their belongings and moved there on a "permanent" basis, with the expectation to move out after 2-6 years. Meanwhile we have troops "deployed" in eastern Europe, as we have not STATIONED them as in moved all their belongings, but rather packed up a bag and flown them there for a few weeks or months.
@MylesKillis Жыл бұрын
Seeing as he also says stationed at times id say he meant what he said. Especially since the people who are in those areas aren't on American soil. So its considered being deployed.
@laughingseal2282 Жыл бұрын
Nationalist citizens of these countries see it as an occupation.
@firemantimmy5367 Жыл бұрын
In the navy, we refer to our ships stationed in Japan as “FDNF-J” which means Forward-Deployed Naval Forces, Japan. They’re near interchangeable.
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Now you know. that's just what this guy said. Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i still can't get over how stupid his video about java island was. it was inaccurate and misleading
@sullathehutt7720 Жыл бұрын
@@MylesKillis No. Okinawa, South Korea, Italy, etc is a duty station. The HQ of the MEF or equivalent force is there. You're in a training cycle, not a deployment cycle. It doesn't matter if you're "not on American soil." A deployment is to like Afghanistan or Kosovo. You are conducting forward operations there. Not just training. You are in harm's way in a totally different posture.
@Mikearice15 ай бұрын
Stuff like this is why I think KZbin is better for being informed about world events and geopolitics than watching broadcast or cable TV, at least here in the States.
@robichard4 ай бұрын
Much, much, much better !
@chew5461-l7f3 ай бұрын
But you can't tell this is a very biased video??
@zenferns3 ай бұрын
@@chew5461-l7fhow?
@justaweeb90863 ай бұрын
And that kind of mindset will have the blindfold pulled over your eyes again before you realize it. Believe nothing, consider everything
@TFNARMY_20093 ай бұрын
@@chew5461-l7f I mean if you consider Bias truth, then sure you’re right.
@josephallsen3135 Жыл бұрын
I have to give major props to the creators of this. You were very clear in the points you made. You did not talk down to your audience while not being overly technical. Your premises were clear. You spent what I feel is about the correct amount of time on explaining the supporting evidence while not getting sidetracked into informational rabbit holes. I was able to follow your thesis and if I want to question your premises; they are presented very clearly so that I could very easily research them myself. You communicated your points with the right amount of clarity and were engaging without patronizing or boring the audience. Setting aside the politics of the topic; from a communication and writing perspective this is a standard that a lot could be learned from. BRAVO! A+ 100 out of 100.
@DrDoGood Жыл бұрын
No one gets 100% in my class. Nope, not happening.
@adammistretta5442 Жыл бұрын
Minor correction at 8:20. China has 3 aircraft carriers, but only “designed and built” one of them, the Fujian. Of the other 2, one (Liaoning) was 60-70 percent built in Ukraine for the Soviet Navy and then sold to China to be completed for the PLAN and the other (Shandong) was built entirely in China but still based on the Soviet design. Just nitpicking for accuracy’s sake
@joshwilliams8863 Жыл бұрын
Came to the comments to say the same thing.
@miyojewoltsnasonth2159 Жыл бұрын
*@adammistretta5442* I appreciate nitpicking for the sake of accuracy. Thank you. *Reply to:* _"Minor correction at __8:20__. China has 3 aircraft carriers, but only “designed and built” one of them, the Fujian. Of the other 2, one (Liaoning) was 60-70 percent built in Ukraine for the Soviet Navy and then sold to China to be completed for the PLAN and the other (Shandong) was built entirely in China but still based on the Soviet design. Just nitpicking for accuracy’s sake"_
@KevinEnjoyer Жыл бұрын
Aye. Although this is a hilarious flex, China saying the Liaoning is combat ready. Remember, this ship is the same as the Kuznetsov, which is a floating laughingstock of a CV that can't even move by itself.
@fakedthunder Жыл бұрын
@@KevinEnjoyerbut that’s mostly russias own fault because they can’t do maintenance for shit, India also has a carrier of that very same model and they operate it without issue
@MrDibara Жыл бұрын
@@fakedthunder _Seriously... _*_WHAT THE FUCK went wrong with the Admiral Kuznetsov?_* 😑 China and India be here making Russia look like amateurs! What, did Russia start thinking aircraft carriers are not worth it?
@jessbakica5233 Жыл бұрын
I knew you where planning something big when an episode didn’t come out last week, love these big episodes ❤
@eurtunwagens23597 ай бұрын
Excellent analysis. Just, one poin: I'm almost sure, you've said that the narrowest point of width of Malacca straight is 1.5 miles. I'd thought it is 24 miles.
@krishnatripathi9576 Жыл бұрын
The Research is so much yet so true. It easily explains why it takes him time to make videos with good quality. Respect.
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading.
@Chris.in.taiwan Жыл бұрын
Fun fact: among other projects the US funded the east - west Powerline construction, which includes a high voltage powerline going across over 3000 meter or 10.000 feet high mountainous terrain. The hike through the area is very unforgiving. Can't imagine how difficult it must have been to build that infrastructure.
@gyapa Жыл бұрын
you just have an opinion and your own biases just like the video creator. Saying "trust me bro I'm Indonesian" means nothing. @@agps4418
@vioo-qn6nw Жыл бұрын
USA regime propaganda nothing else, bro. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on
@Titanium_Cranium Жыл бұрын
Greetings from Scotland. I've been loving this channel so much since I found it a few months ago. The production quality and clear explanations of complex political situations are amazing. You also manage to make what can be quite dry subjects seem very exciting in a way I haven't encountered before. I feel like Neo after his first download except instead of kung foo I'm like: "I know geopolitics!" Thanks for all your hard work producing such high quality content.
@LongIslandIced-Tea Жыл бұрын
Actually, Scotland and England have always been two countries. But China's civil war never ended.
@Titanium_Cranium Жыл бұрын
@@LongIslandIced-TeaWhat has my country's relationship with it's Southern neighbour got to do with my comment about this channel? I'm well aware of our own history.
@BajsgBsjsj Жыл бұрын
Because of Americans@@LongIslandIced-Tea
@rongyaowang1075 Жыл бұрын
You are such a shameless villain! Deliberate slander and slander! Where is your conscience? People like you have no bottom line! You are as shameless as the blogger! Slander China? Will you make progress yourself? What is your purpose? You know best!
@bigdogg9644 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@WinterSkyyy Жыл бұрын
At about 30 mins in, you referred to the Australia -France submarine deal as "nuclear." It wasnt, it was for Australia to buy French diesel-electric submarines:)
@mktj1 Жыл бұрын
I caught that too. RLL sloppy.
@ShinyWasTakenTwice Жыл бұрын
@@mktj1 Pretty much everybody is sloppy when it comes to global politics that include Australia for some reason
@AgitatedTaco Жыл бұрын
Imagine watching a real life lore video in the 1930s 😳
@JV-lq3tx Жыл бұрын
Though Australia's conventional sub was based on the France's Barracuda class which is nuclear.
@djanitatiana Жыл бұрын
It wasn't quite as controversial as certain media portray. Lefties winged a little but in general Australia knows the problems we've had with Chinese aggression could get a lot worse.
@mikebrmike5 ай бұрын
Australia's cancelled submarine order with France wasn't for nuclear submarines... It was for diesel electric. Going with AUKUS meant they'd gain nuclear submarine capability
@robertamann20934 ай бұрын
you sir are correct, and you and the rest of us sucker's will pay for this crazy plan.
@flavio71804 ай бұрын
It was much more about security cooperation. France is one of the few countries that possesses and produces nuclear submarines, just like the US and the UK, but Australia went with the AUKUS agreement since it's much more important for Australian security if tensions with China rise.
@mikebrmike4 ай бұрын
@@flavio7180 France builds them for their own navy but they aren't for sale... Only their conventional submarines are for export
@SnowmanTF24 ай бұрын
Plus the order with France was hardly going smoothly, it kept hitting snags/delays. With costs on path to be more than double the initial bid, might have been closer to three times the bid already but it has been a while since I looked into it.
@SilverforceX4 ай бұрын
Australia gains nothing. Those are US virginia subs, crewed by mostly US, and under US command. Australia just pays huge amount for protection racket.
@justinholt7059 Жыл бұрын
I would like to point out that he mentioned that China had the largest navy in terms of "surface" vessels but the US still has pretty much 10x the tonnage of the chinese
@NachoBrochacho. Жыл бұрын
and Missiles
@christopherg7483 Жыл бұрын
came here to say this myself
@2shay550 Жыл бұрын
I think the Chinese count inflatable rafts as surface vessels 😅
@garrettwilson3032 Жыл бұрын
@@2shay550 Yeah, and they put toy aircraft carriers in the harbor to say that they have more of those too
@eftheusempire Жыл бұрын
Number of vessels and tonnage is irrelevant compared to what weapons and defense systems they are carrying. Looking at the wrong data broham
@tomw4643 Жыл бұрын
A good report - - -In fact, as a former strategic planning analyst, I find it fascinating that our media technology and information access has progressed to the point of providing an hour-long detailed accounting of the US forces, deployment, capabilities, locations, weapon systems and likely combat tactics in such detail prior to a possible engagement with our potential future enemy. In WWI and even in the Cold War, people were shot or imprisoned for revealing such information at this level of detail. It can be argued that this is simply an elaborate warning sign in the best traditions of the MAD Doctrine but it might be equally valid for China (PRC) to interpret all this as details of the US offensive capabilities for a first-strike invasion of PRC. This latter interpretation is one that Russia has believed for most of the last 75 years.
@clarkd1955 Жыл бұрын
Was there any information here that reasonably wouldn’t be known by the CCP? I think not.
@tinthaung7118 Жыл бұрын
Just an AI bot. Come on.🤪
@tonyfiling-h8b Жыл бұрын
I agree too. People that put this stuff out, sound the alarm for what we could possibly do. Whoever put this on here, way to go buddy. Think China cared more for this than the intended audience.
@IvanJohnson-w2k Жыл бұрын
@@kw1178everything in this video is obviously known by Chinese intelligence already. You think the MSS is stupid
@hyua6841 Жыл бұрын
You think China doesn't already know all this?@@tonyfiling-h8b
@tankeater3 ай бұрын
16:08 I'm an ARMY Combat Infantry Veteran that was a Mortarman. Having those 3 guns so close together, sent shivers down my spine!!! TRAIN LIKE YOU FIGHT! 1 well placed round, will leave a crater in that entire area from all their rounds exploring.
@yuansizhu62713 ай бұрын
We see 3 teams of them as 3 units. However maybe the higher leader sees them together as 1 unit... I don't know.
@tankeater3 ай бұрын
@@yuansizhu6271 in the ARMY it's 4 guns, 2nd gun is your Base Gun and FDC is your comms and Fire Direction Comtrol, known as a Mtr Platoon with up to 24 men in the Platoon. It's a specialty unit.
@ScootsMcPootАй бұрын
china has no combat experiance
@1lyxbollyvykn714 Жыл бұрын
me, living in latin america, a region ignored from global stage, without any voice or significant alliance outside of the continent, I am quite happy to live here because if both sides choose to start a war, we'll be ignored by every other superpower, we never had anything to lose from the beginning, why matter now
@sandrinowitschM Жыл бұрын
Hey uhm... So are you guys still willing to take in a few German war refugees? Asking for a Freund.
@mikami5799 Жыл бұрын
clearly you don’t know that there were fleets of Chinese fishing boat fishing in latin American water...
@Cincy32 Жыл бұрын
China has been arming indigenous rebel groups in southern Chile.
@tedwong7037 Жыл бұрын
You are being exploiting by US cooperates in daily basis, latin america is natural resource rich but economy weak, due to its “american backyard”status.
@jaehongsong4904 Жыл бұрын
Oh, yes it will matter. USA and China colliding will mean the end of our modern economy. Rich countries will survive, but majority of poor countries will go bankrupt
@kingcobra2608 Жыл бұрын
The submarine deal between France and Australia was not for nuclear powered submarine, but for conventional powered submarines.
@jordanrussell345 Жыл бұрын
So France was wanting to sell their leftover junk to Australia and Australia backed out for a better deal? Poor France.
@alexross26 Жыл бұрын
nobody wants conventional anymore. too limited and high maintenance. The reactors on nuclear subs are incredibly safe (at least now) and come with incredible benefits such as logistics and longevity.
@Zack-fu4lo Жыл бұрын
@@alexross26 the problem was that france offered australia nuclear. australia was the one that insisted on having it be conventional. probably the australian gov at the times fault
@dragginmedown Жыл бұрын
@@Zack-fu4loyeah our government are pussies for anything nuclear
@KlausBahnhof Жыл бұрын
@@alexross26 Those nuclear submarines are a colossal waste of money and will be effectively under US control. They're intended to patrol the South China Sea, not to defend Australia's coastline. Paul Keating was correct in his criticisms.
@mothjoke Жыл бұрын
Your work never ceases to amaze me. Great job
@karenedonald7 ай бұрын
well done, great info. i am a Brit , 20 years in Indonesia
@NATUREN3ST Жыл бұрын
I am concerned that Guam will have too many US bases and tip over, and capsize.
@Artyomi Жыл бұрын
We need to inform the pentagon of your findings immediately, and just in case pull out all bases and troops from Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Okinawa, Diego Garcia, and all the other islands used as “natural aircraft carriers”
@MrPlainsflyer Жыл бұрын
Now that would be funny😂
@zachplaysallday-zpad5731 Жыл бұрын
Ayo??
@jesseguerra4131 Жыл бұрын
didn’t a georgian politician say that?
@MrPlainsflyer Жыл бұрын
@jesseguerra4131 yes, lol, though I don't know if he was joking or just mentally impaired
@frankdasnake Жыл бұрын
Dude you are a fucking tank. Just casually dropping another gripping, hour-long film with excellent and consistent production quality. Respect...
@ScootsMcPootАй бұрын
full of western propaganda
@SithAssassin Жыл бұрын
I want to thank you for the amazing amount of effort that goes into these videos
@chuckb1448 Жыл бұрын
I agree, I just wish he talked a second slower lol, he's pouring out info super fast
@vioo-qn6nw Жыл бұрын
USA regime propaganda nothing else. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on
@MichaelBrown-wx6zq Жыл бұрын
Idk we've gotten this same content like 4 times now.
@thesincitymama Жыл бұрын
@@chuckb1448 I agree - I changed the playback speed in the video settings to 0.75 (did you know we can do that?)
@chuckb1448 Жыл бұрын
@@thesincitymama nope, I didn't know that
@luck4Is6 ай бұрын
I've been watching RealLifeLore videos since 2018, but never before I felt so attached to it until the end. Great job, even though it has 1-hour length I simply couldn't stop watching it.
@dsmichael8080 Жыл бұрын
I'm Singaporean and I really doubt Singapore will want to play any part in an offensive against China. Singapore has very close ties to China and would not risk angering China. However, it is true that we do cooperate with the US to a certain extent.
@aredtomato8957 Жыл бұрын
I believe ASEAN is smart enough to not get themselves involved in other people's internal affairs. Lol. It's obvious the US is the root cause of all problems we have today. Take a look at how the west blocks UN aid to Gaza people. Then saying how they care for Muslim in China LOL 😂😂😂
@BacaiRob Жыл бұрын
政府是政府,美军在那里,谁能阻止?李显龙能指挥在新加坡的美军?
@shanerooney7288 Жыл бұрын
To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.
@robmiller1808 Жыл бұрын
@@shanerooney7288 BS.
@strayedarticle2838 Жыл бұрын
@@shanerooney7288China is the #1 trading partner of the US, and loaned them several trillion for all those wars in the middle east. That doesn't stop the US from surrounding China with 400 military bases and instigating conflicts with them.
@markday092009 Жыл бұрын
Sir, you are doing so much good for putting out information like this. Your videos are absolutely amazing. Thank you for your work and dedication!
@vioo-qn6nw Жыл бұрын
USA regime propaganda nothing else. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on
@jaylewis1383 Жыл бұрын
Just a footnote: B-52s are designed to carry nuclear bombs, but they also are very good at laying sea mines. The US has upgraded its nautical mines, and a B-52 unit did a concept test off Hawaii earlier this year. Look where RAAF Tindal is, and at the sea lanes where the Chinese move their oil supplies. The B-52s can do a lot of damage without escalating to a nuclear exchange.
@nanbutinanquibotiqui11 ай бұрын
The Chinese can also do a lot of damage to the B52s. America's aircraft carriers (today's dinosaurs) are sitting ducks for China's DF carrier killer hypersonic missiles. Don't think that the US military is invincible. Just remember the Titanic. And the US just lost the Afghanistan war and will soon lose the Ukraine war as was widely reported. The US fled Vietnam without winning the war in 1975. It was forced to a truce in the Korean war after the Chinese army pushed the US military out of North Korea. Don't think that the US military is superior - not at all. The US is good at talking big and bullying other countries.
@cooper181911 ай бұрын
The sea lanes are also use by Japan & Korea, and also commercial ships that move goods to South East Asia and beyond. Anyway, for oil, could easily come from Central Asia & Russia, via land & deserts right? BTW, these days nuclear bombs are carried by intercontinental ballistic missile and supersonic missiles, not planes.
@mobiusflammel937211 ай бұрын
@@cooper1819We are eyeing mod 13 for the B61, meant to be carried by the Raider. At the very least the US likes to keep the option of being able to drop nukes from planes if it needs to, even if it’s not the most likely method of delivery.
@michaelj.jordan173211 ай бұрын
Soft, try us😂
@danielcalvo463511 ай бұрын
Lol poor men you believe everything they tell you 😂 Look question: is it possible that Russia provides China w all the resources they via inland transport!?!? Russia has petrol and anything you want basically...
@davidsosa94556 ай бұрын
Excellent work, congratulations.
@mr.bennett108 Жыл бұрын
I love these videos because they're essentially that kid in world history class who wrote a presentation so bomb even the jocks were silently enthralled. 10/10
@c.d.j300 Жыл бұрын
I'd be the class clown the nerd inspired to take history class seriously enough to ace it... (Commenting from experience).
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading.
@Azuria969 Жыл бұрын
nice try 无毛 ccp pawn, you wont get your salary today
@DarrellWilkerson4.6 Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418hes often wrong 😂 hes got a strong bias and his research is questionable at times.
@dopaminedreams1122 Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418 eh, everyone has different perspectives and sources, your idea of bias or untrue may not line up with someone elses, doesnt mean he doesnt research his videos and otherwise present largely accurate information
@aymonfoxc1442 Жыл бұрын
Great video. It's length (which I enjoyed) is unequivocally justified by the breadth and depth of research required to fully comprehend the issues surrounding such a large and important subject.
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading. this is after all just a content from a creator in a views-and-ad based platform
@louisd6410 Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418there are a lot of mistakes and bias in the video, they got the ROC claim wrong. They even claimed mongolia
@aymonfoxc1442 Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418That's fair but it's a vast subject and a lot for one video to cover. I think it's good that people get introduced to the complexities of the South China Sea, Taiwan, and competing interests. Honestly, Java is a hard island for anybody to understand, yet alone outsiders.
@aymonfoxc1442 Жыл бұрын
@@louisd6410If I recall correctly, both sides have claimed Mongolia is Chinese but Mao couldn't pursue this because Mongolia was protected by the USSR. There's good reason for Mongolian 'communism'.
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
@@aymonfoxc1442 not true, it's a simple thing: in reality, java is populous because facilities are better there and living cost is much cheaper than the rest of the country, this is due to the past president's programs. in his video, he said, java is populous simply because of food. totally inaccurate. the same thing is potentially happening with all his videos.
@gallaghergibson8024 Жыл бұрын
Small correction: the Franco-Australian submarine deal was not for nuclear submarines. It was for diesel submarines. Which explains the strategic reasoning behind breaking the agreement with the French: what they're getting from AUKUS is way more effective.
@mariam-bk5103 ай бұрын
I really like the way ReaLifeLore always provides informative, objective and convincing analysis without any political bias. From the beginning to the end, he only tried to analyse the reasons and intentions behind each move by the US and China, without concluding who is right or wrong, unlike other channels which insert a lot of personal political opinions into their stories.
@tawnkramer Жыл бұрын
Appreciate all your work to layout this information so beautifully and clearly. It’s amazing how little time our mainstream media spends on issues this important. Silently we are positioning for a global conflict that could claim many of our sons and daughters.
@ThatWolfArrow Жыл бұрын
It's the ww1 alliance daisy chain all over again.
@josephlynch7655 Жыл бұрын
The media spends a lot of time covering this subject. I see it all the time
@Sharer01 Жыл бұрын
没戏,你们没钱也没制造业
@tawnkramer Жыл бұрын
@@Sharer01 I’m sorry. Google translate isn’t doing a good job on translating your text. I hope that it says you value your sons and daughters too. Because I know you do. Let’s choose option A, peace.
@AL-lh2ht Жыл бұрын
Yet this guy say china attacks all of US Asian assets somehow forgot that means china attacks like a dozen countries. Literally that means japan, Philippines, South Korea, Australia, and every nations they defense agreements with, would forced to declare war with China. You think japan being bombed and they would do nothing? Come on.
When I was in the USAF, I was at Kadena. Also known as the halfway point between Taiwan and Tokyo. You said the main Wing of Kadena but there's a 2nd which I was at. The 353d SOW. It was the 353d SOG when I was there. Has a history going back to WWII as the 3rd Air Commando Group.
@CollectiveWest15 ай бұрын
Very informative but one minor correction - the French submarine deal with Australia was non-nuclear i.e. diesel-powered submarine technology. In the vast spaces of the Pacific, nuclear-powered submarines are likely to be more useful.
@mithrigar Жыл бұрын
Prior submarine agreement with France was for diesel submarines, not nuclear
@AgitatedTaco Жыл бұрын
Imagine watching a real life lore video in the 1930s 😳
@krisshaw9464 Жыл бұрын
I would be like ahhhhhhhĥĥhĥhĥhĥĥĥ this is gonna suck u gotta be kidding me I can't believe all this is really gonna happen I must know more to the time machine quickly I must know more
@graceneilitz7661 Жыл бұрын
Well… then you would already know that war was coming and you wouldn’t have to worry about world ending nuclear weapons. Nukes because a thing in 1945, with the second and third nukes ever created being used in war.
@M78ccc10 ай бұрын
@@graceneilitz7661 It is ridiculous that these nuclear weapons were used in Japan. Americans killed 200000 Japanese people with nuclear weapons, but now they want to use Japan to confront China and let the Japanese continue to sacrifice their lives for the United States
@JBG1995zgz Жыл бұрын
Your videos are getting better, and better and better. An hour pass like 10 minutes. Congratulations. Super interesting Documentary!
@ravenouself41817 ай бұрын
Context: The ROC, with support from the USA, came up with the "11-dash line". The 9-dash line is a reduced area. Interestingly, the PRC and ROC are not the only ones with absurd and overlapping claims in the South China Sea.
@kypirko5710 Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the way you explain things with great visuals and information. Thank you.
@bigk6860 Жыл бұрын
RLL I just want to say thank you for all the research and work you put in the knowledge that you provide to people, not just on this but even on the Myanmar civil war I had no idea that was going on and now I'm doing my own research on it, keep making videos hopefully you can make a video on Myanmar civil war and bring more international recognition to a country that desperately needs it.
@itsyaboytravlpro Жыл бұрын
Hey man started watching you back when you were just starting. Very proud of you, and hope you do even better in the future
@80AM. Жыл бұрын
you're like 12 stop
@aarons568911 ай бұрын
I am such a nerd. This was my favorite video in a long time. Thank you for making it.
@marjtayao12322 ай бұрын
Great detailed video ❤
@justinolive6171 Жыл бұрын
Minor correction: the French submarine contract before the AUKUS deal was for diesel-electric submarines, not for nuclear-powered subs. That's partly why China had some justification for flipping out and threatening that Aus is now a nuclear target
@SuperFranzs Жыл бұрын
Why did you have to remind me of that one court hearing with the World's stupidest woman.
@leihtory7423 Жыл бұрын
nah france offered their nuclear submarines. australia rejected. australia told france to design and build a diesel electric sub. france spent billions of dollars converting their nuke subs to diesel electric. build new tool machines & facilities to construct what aus wanted. then australia changed its mind again and wants nuclear submarines. now usas-australia-uk submarine deal involves having to pay france for their money spent on diesel sub design.
@Sparks00psn Жыл бұрын
Nuclear means nuclear powered by a reactor, not that they launch nukes.
@Spaceshps Жыл бұрын
True, Why purchasing an inferior products from a country losing 3 major wars + 30 other minor wars with the British empire. Australia has a right to go for Supreme product from USA!
@Partyrockers540 Жыл бұрын
Let’s face it if a war between the us and china it would be one of the worse wars in history
@m3po2210 ай бұрын
Compared to last time I saw a video from you, I think you've vastly improved your vocal inflections to be much more natural. Great job.
@traviswilkins28647 ай бұрын
It's still a bit bothersome IMO. I haven't watched the others but the inflections still drive me crazy despite the solid content.
@ObamanableSnowman7 ай бұрын
Wow really? His inflections are pretty good in my opinions, I think that it helps tell the stories. I think y’all shouldn’t be providing recommendations about this to him, because most people who follow him like it.
@traviswilkins28647 ай бұрын
@@ObamanableSnowman this is true. He’s obviously extremely successful. I don’t know why I felt the need to share my opinion 😅
@rizzlr7 ай бұрын
@@traviswilkins2864 its okay to share your opinion. dont let anybody police what you say
@rizzlr7 ай бұрын
@@ObamanableSnowman they never recommended anything. it was an observation/opinion that was shared. Stop tryna censor people's opinions while in the same turn sharing your own.
@ahima1982 Жыл бұрын
very informative video, just a slight correction. The capabilities China is building up is Anti Access/Area Denial, often called A2/AD, not A2D2, which wouldn't match the words it stands for.
@digitalnomad56435 ай бұрын
Brilliant presentation. Finally, someone giving a truthful account of the history of the RoC and the PRC, instead of dishing out one-sided propaganda.
@nikos.1644 Жыл бұрын
The amount of information presented in such a high quality way essentially for free is unbelievable. How much research must have gone into this?!
@remyphilly5168 Жыл бұрын
Lots bud. Lots
@rdsc.455 Жыл бұрын
Propaganda is always distributed and force fed into the minds of masses FREE. Both sides are hell bent upon to unleash .
@toasty4000000 Жыл бұрын
Information and all the relevant videos and infographics, across an hour long video? It's crazy, crazy good
@rrutter818 ай бұрын
One of your best videos. (commenting for the algorithm)
@gary74669 ай бұрын
Very impresive. A lot of info, good footage and analysis. Well done.
@Prosecutor30008 ай бұрын
He talking shit. 80% of this information is not proofed and only based on information of us lgbtq forces.
@gary74668 ай бұрын
No he is not. What do you mean 'proofed'. You are the one talking shit.
@yadwinderpurewal68236 ай бұрын
Very Informative and Realistic regarding past and present of the total situation… Great and a very Intelligent Work.. Big Ups for the true information.. Cheers Mate… Keep It Up this good work and grow even much much more for the cause of Goodness..
@suddhojitgon592911 ай бұрын
Fantastic detailing coupled with excellent graphics. Every video fascinates me. Looking forward to more such fabulous content.
@LovelyBriVertefeuill Жыл бұрын
lol I live on Okinawa and he said Kadena wrong but it’s an amazing island and the people here are so friendly. He’s not wrong about how heavily militarized it is here
@caffiend. Жыл бұрын
Okinawa is one of the military's favorite duty stations.
@BudiandLeo Жыл бұрын
I always heard that the Native Okinawans always got the shortest end of the stick in its long history.
@WaterFruitTree Жыл бұрын
No -- he (shockingly) said Kadena right. The way USN/USAF personnel pronounce it is wrong 90% of the time. If you're stationed there, don't be lazy, learn Japanese.
@Bayard1503 Жыл бұрын
@@BudiandLeo Well, even now they are forcefully assimilated, denied their language..
@M78ccc10 ай бұрын
Have Okinawans ever thought that if they help the United States fight against China, they would suffer an unprecedented disaster, as Okinawa is under the firepower of China
@KurtisC93 Жыл бұрын
This video is highly detailed with regards to the multi-pronged defense/deterrence strategy currently being implemented by the United States in the West Pacific. What isn't mentioned by RLL, but is also very important, is the increased military cooperation between the US and a few other countries of strategic significance, specifically India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam. That's in addition to Thailand, another longtime American ally that directly borders Myanmar and has coastlines on both the Pacific and Indian Oceans. If the Tatmadaw remains in control of Myanmar and helps China to circumvent their Achilles heel in the Malacca Strait, the US _could_ use its relations with Bangladesh, Thailand, and potentially India to navally blockade Burmese ports in the Bengal Bay, thereby eliminating a major alternate route for Chinese energy imports.
@josejf2089 Жыл бұрын
Russia is a big country in energy and food, so
@李小白-x4v Жыл бұрын
Blockade China with what? Hollywood movies?
@GolemRising Жыл бұрын
@@josejf2089 The infrastructure to move it does not currently exist, and would take years to build. Also, Russia is currently loosing its own war and does not have much in the way of extra oil or food to send elsewhere.
@dianapennepacker6854 Жыл бұрын
@@李小白-x4vBy stopping ships away from the mainland from accessesing Chinese ports. With the help of various countries of course. You see that is where China dropped the ball. Their aggressive antics has made countries decide that as bad as the US is? They aren't nearly as bad as a world with the CCP. If Xi wasn't such a power hungry control freak, and took pages from Deng who was an amazing leader? China would be well on their way to being the dominate country economically, militarily, and geopoliticaly..
@1mol831 Жыл бұрын
If China doesn’t act what excuse would USA do to continue? USA does have time frame limitations, China is probably waiting until US gets tired of staying in the area and doing nothing and eventually another president comes up and focuses on other things. So either USA strikes first, which the other countries would probably stay neutral as they really have nothing to gain by adding their country to the conflict, or China can wait until USA disengages. Or USA can block the strait, though it would harm everyone’s interest
@ricamistad7 ай бұрын
Very informative..well done !👍
@fencserx9423 Жыл бұрын
The problem with the provocation argument is that china is very likely not ready yet. They likely need at least 5 years before they have the capabilities to be capable of overcoming the western response as it stands right now. Basically the bet is that moving now is a loss, and we’re preparing to ensure that moving later is still a loss
@MUISHAGGY572 Жыл бұрын
Yeah but BRICS is more than ready and the US wouldn't want to go against that.
@arnold3768 Жыл бұрын
Being an aggressor can present quite a dilemma huh :D "To invade or not to invade - that is the question" - CCP
@kampfer91 Жыл бұрын
No , the last thing you would wanna do is underestimate the enemy , China is ready but they choose not to act yet . We all make fun of Chinese military hardware just to stroke ours ego of western military stronk but with how technology advance , how China keep building up military force while USA and her western allies only care how to add more women to the army while keep burning theirs money on pointless conflicts . A real commander will always be ready for the worst ....
@dylanbh1 Жыл бұрын
@@MUISHAGGY572lmao yea everyone fears world renowned super power South Africa 🤣🤣
@Monkofthecaribbean Жыл бұрын
@@MUISHAGGY572 Brics is economic partnership so doesnt matter. If anything India would side with US and fight China. Brazil would do nothing and Russia is a joke. Even if all of Brics went to war with US you get US allies are much more powerful than Brics aside from China.
@levth01sct Жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention Diego Garcia and point it on the map, US Military Base in the Indian Ocean. I think that base would play a crucial role in the event of a war with China.
@calebdesjardins616 Жыл бұрын
Every video you put out makes me more and more nervous for a world war haha but thank you for the incredible info
@GlobalTrends-g5r4 ай бұрын
Thank you for the informative discussion. Good analysis!
@pathonnn11 ай бұрын
This video is so well informed. This is better then anything you see on main steam news. Well done!
@PepeCoinMania10 ай бұрын
It’s USA based
@julesverneinoz Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this coverage, very informative and great quality. Not covered in this video: - Continued raw resource acquisition by China from various countries to build weapons (eg. iron) - Their manufacturing capability (eg. for weapon and overall self-sufficiency in a protracted war) - Cyber warfare capability
@大案要案命案在身9 ай бұрын
谁在想和中国人开战。
@jsmsolutions8689 ай бұрын
could you tell me which country has been involved in the most wars since War-War-II? Is Taiwan a country?
@filex-ll5jd9 ай бұрын
白看了,讲的很清楚,美国@@大案要案命案在身
@Reflectic_9 ай бұрын
Lol
@iceteazen9 ай бұрын
@@jsmsolutions868 US of course but China made these situation dire for themselves. Imagine pissing off your neighbors with multiple territorial claims. Some of this neighbors are historically US ally. So that got them it to this big trouble were they cannot retake Taiwan anymore. There is simple no way they can fight that many countries.
@lou1958 Жыл бұрын
Pakistan's cooperation with China and the unresolved border issues don't sit well with India. I could see them sit out a US/China conflict, unless it was in their interest to join in. I doubt very seriously they would be on China's side. Very well-done video with solid information. Thanks.
@VinVin21969 Жыл бұрын
india dont be in china side.. but they also wont sit with u.s . since they will get sacrificed.
@Ankit-d9f4u Жыл бұрын
Nope The war between india and China is highly unlikely simply because we both have lot to lose and both india and China know this fact There will only be border skirmishes but never a full blown war
@Ironbanner12 Жыл бұрын
India knows the betrayal to be on China's side, 1962.
@Ankit-d9f4u Жыл бұрын
@@Ironbanner12 India never choose sides Our foreign policy is neutral as always
@Tirth-Patel Жыл бұрын
@@Ankit-d9f4uNot entirely neutral, but yeah the nature of the foreign policy is leaning towards that.
@Chander-im7dk7 ай бұрын
Extremely knowledgeable reporting
@WhoTookRoKam Жыл бұрын
I think of everything I’ve learned from this video the one that stands out the most is: The US is literally everywhere
@leonardowynnwidodo9704 Жыл бұрын
Although very small, the 9-dash Line is also disputed with Indonesia's EEZ with the Natuna Islands
@JS-ix6zt Жыл бұрын
What’s crazy is we sacrificed the American manufacturing base and middle class desperately trying to stop any China Russia alliance and now we allowed that alliance to form regardless
@ultimobile5 ай бұрын
wow - a pretty full and complex analysis !
@colinmartin9797 Жыл бұрын
minor correction - the pacific northwest base is in BREMERTON, washington, not Kitsap. kitsap is the county bremerton is in, not a city. im an EMT in bremerton, and driving past the nimitz every day is awesome. we also have naval station everett a short distance away that is where most of our destroyers are based, and will be where our guided missile frigates will be as of 2022 also, you included a picture of the trimaran littoral combat ship coronado - she was decomissioned a year ago. we have two of them in bremerton. if i understand, we are converting one or both into museums. gorgeous things but apparently they were complete garbage
@meronyu545210 ай бұрын
Map error: ROC’s claimed territory includes Tibet and Mongolia
@miikalehtimaki1136 Жыл бұрын
As someone with deuteropia, I'd liked some more contrast in the Myanmar graphic in 52:16. Great stuff otherwise, as always!
@seraph37615 ай бұрын
I could literally watch 24 hours of your presentation and your knowledge and not get bored. 👏
@viveksanthosh19 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@lifetimevic Жыл бұрын
Correction. The Australian/ France deal was for non nuclear submarines.
@squa_81 Жыл бұрын
It was very funny seeing memes in france about submarines on sale on leboncoin (french ebay) for seemingly no reason
@stevecariggillio4139 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear powered* not armed.
@lifetimevic Жыл бұрын
@@stevecariggillio4139 nope. The French deal was for diesel submarines. That got torn up when aukus deal was signed fobbing Australia nuclear powered subs. The video said the French were giving us nuclear powered subs and they were giving us diesel powered subs.
@1mol831 Жыл бұрын
@@lifetimevicwhy does Australia need submarines though. Australia doesn’t have geopolitical rivals unless they want to create rivals. It’s in one of the most friendly neighbours.
@abdiganiaden Жыл бұрын
@@1mol831 they are obviously a giant island, they want to protect all that resources they stole from natives.
@nubianking4203 Жыл бұрын
Your videos are incredibly good. U deserve all the success that you have and more
@karloyu34847 ай бұрын
You hit it right. Good worked. The best possible scenarios in Taiwan invasion of China you ever seen, and the Myanmar Cout d' état and the Rohingyan crisis that still ongoing. You carry them all in one full episode. 👍
@CastSenpai Жыл бұрын
This was so comprehensive and well put together. I learned tons. Normally I never have this issue, but with so many decisions in this video I am 50/50 on which would happen. The preemptive strike against the US, for example. Still trying to decide which strategies China would end up actually employ IF they decide to invade, which itself I am almost 50/50 on.
@aguywithanopinion8912 Жыл бұрын
Invade whom? You mean Taiwan, yeah? China aren't dumb enough to attack the US.
@TyroPirate Жыл бұрын
He definitely presented a lot of hypotheticals for how China would invade… but what evidence was presented that makes you feel 50/50 on if China would actually do it?
@CastSenpai Жыл бұрын
@@TyroPirate Because they have alternatives, such as influencing elections, or perhaps other diplomatic option. Or just avoiding the drastic options due to the worldwide consequences. Do you feel 50/50 isn't accurate? I thought it was generous, considering the logistical weight of both the operation itself and how all foreign nations respond.
@TyroPirate Жыл бұрын
@@CastSenpai But RLL admits in the vid that the more popular support seems to be going for the Taiwanese Independence political party. So doesn’t seem like they are doing a good job at their propaganda breaking through to the people there… So… what are those other diplomatic options? And besides, it’s all “they could” and hypotheticals here. But what are the things that China is actually doing right now that might lead someone to thing they’ll try to take control of Taiwan (either politically or militarily). That’s why I’m not confident in 50/50. I feel like RLL didn’t give any good proof that China is gonna do it… But maybe I missed something?
@CastSenpai Жыл бұрын
@@TyroPirate They have good reason to, they also have good reason NOT to. They also are dealing with a time limit where it will eventually not become an option, similar to what Russia had going on before they invaded Ukraine. Also, China very recently released their claimed territory map, which was a MESS. They claimed land that is part of India, Nepal, Bhutan, and even Russia. Not to mention their extremely aggressive stance on the South China Sea. Point is, They seem to be very focused on projecting themselves very aggressively, which you could argue shows intent to follow through with their map visions.
@breezer20 Жыл бұрын
I love how you keep using icons for troops, tanks, aircraft carriers and nukes from the game civ6 it looks really goofy but good in its own way
@coryschutz95749 ай бұрын
Great video thanks
@dustinblackburn65412 ай бұрын
What a damn good video!!!
@louisyip6622 Жыл бұрын
I think RealLifeLove tells it much better than Johnny Harris, not only giving a clear historical background, but also analyzing the current landscape of Taiwan and China, rather than just thinking American.
@blanchimont5587 Жыл бұрын
johnny is getting better tho, his recent video on china's boarders was actually quite good. but rll is unmatched in his modern conflicts style of videos
@lxma Жыл бұрын
aren’t we all looking for RealLifeLove
@aaronyoghurt9210 Жыл бұрын
Jhonny is biased af. That's why I don't watch him anyomore. I know he's always using western lens
@adventurefaps9571 Жыл бұрын
You mean CIA Harris?
@bane8305 Жыл бұрын
Dude Johnny is the most biased youtuber ever I stopped watching his shit years ago
@troybond8 ай бұрын
wow the work that went into this video must be staggering
@calebsmith1968 Жыл бұрын
This is an incredible video. Thank you for all the research and effort you took to create it!
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i still can't get over how stupid his video about java island was. it was inaccurate and misleading
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
Take his videos with grains of salt. i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading. this is after all just a content from a creator in a view-and-ad based platform
@haydencarlson2861 Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418you just copy pasting this or what
@Eternal_Tech Жыл бұрын
@@agps4418 Exactly what was inaccurate in this video about Java island?
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
@@Eternal_Tech i didn't say he mentioned java in this video though?
@Xavier_Destalis3 ай бұрын
I was about to comment that you'd forgotten one of the few other things than the US keeping China in check, and then I was recommended your video on the theoretical upcoming Indo-China war. 10/10 algorithmic planning.
@everypitchcounts4875 Жыл бұрын
US is developing a few different mobile launch platforms to have in Guam and Philippines. Typhon weapon system which would be armed with SM-6 & Tomahawk cruise missiles, NMESIS armed with NSM, Dark Eagle mobile launchers armed with LRHW. Can't forget about the new HACM.
@Vertebray Жыл бұрын
Great video! Minor error, a couple of times you mentioned China’s “A2D2” network. It’s actually “A2/AD”, anti-access, area denial
@miyojewoltsnasonth2159 Жыл бұрын
Well done, *RealLifeLore,* I'm now watching it a second time. I particularly appreciated the potential future relations between Burma and China at the end.