Royal Marine Reacts To Why The SU-35 is Such a Formidable Aircraft

[@abhishekg510]

No evidence for that Ukraine claim, that is the problem

[@alexschmidt2489]

Ukrainians lie as soon as they open their mouths!!!

[@Роман_Кэррингтон]

The Ukrainian media have already "shot down" so many Russian planes that they should have won the war long ago. The "Ghost of Kiev" especially tried to do this.😂 But seriously, there is not a single confirmed Ukrainian air victory, and the number of confirmed downed Russian aircraft using air defense systems does not exceed 30 units. Which, by the way, is not surprising, since Ukraine was armed with Russian air defense systems, and these are VERY good weapons.

[@krc306]

The ghost of kiev shot down 6 million su35s in one day

[@MsLampalampa]

@@krc306Russia is making Ukrainian ghosts every day

[@friendlyreptile9931]

UA is winning on YT und TV but Russia is winning in RL :D

[@jonoircosta4572]

Excelente 😂😂😂😂😂

[@Alexey4263]

@@krc306 🤣🤣😅😆

[@PAULDOUGLAS08]

The F-22 had problems shooting down a Chinese balloon. Remember that one?

[@moisesflorespadilla2695]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 correct😂😂😂😂😂

[@kueilin808]

The altitude was too high for other jet,the raptor can reach it,and it only takes one aim9x .the only problem is balloon have small infrared signals.

[@raivenbeatz1468]

@@kueilin808 cope is real lmaooo f22 doesnt have a track record because its overhyped crap

[@elricmagar9307]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@user-di5rm9ee1p]

I always wonder how Russians have the worst weapons but always win at the end. Wait, yes, winter helps them I forgot.

[@verilyze]

It's toughness due to less tech dependency they are better

[@malikatamaeva3811]

Российские Самолеты, лучшие в Мире.

[@StanislavBoyko]

and Bear!!!

[@Mocsk]

Russians always have the worst propaganda, that's why you think they have the worst weapons and that winter somehow helps them as if they don't have to fight in the same conditions as their enemy

[@andrejusaleksejevas9218]

🙂🙃😂 👍✋👋

[@zayhansdah]

do check out the Su-47 Berkut, it was an experimental aircraft with forward swept wings like the Grumman X-29 technology demonstrator for NASA and USAF

[@kotor1892]

Serbia shot down an f16. we got its wing in a museum. Does that make it a bad plane? No :)

[@СтёпаСергеев-э6п]

and shooted down F-117

[@jesus-valirius1579]

you guys managed to shoot down an F-117 bro

[@shotaiverruss9002]

@@jesus-valirius1579Видимо сербы не знали, что f-117 невидимка! Поэтому и сбили. Они даже извинились за свой поступок)))

[@JosipMiller]

​@@СтёпаСергеев-э6п And their extremist and trespassers got themselves kicked out of Croatia after 4 years of illegitimate annexation of 1/3 of it's territory. And got themselves bombed by NATO in 1999 after era when one baby cart price was 60 monthly salaries during the rule of complete and utter lunatic and his street gangs. Serbia shoot down F117, which is exceptional success but they got themselves bombed into stone age by B-2s, so one F117 is shallow victory. But I guess, nice comfort in extremely difficult times.

[@Trinavara]

​@@shotaiverruss9002😅

[@iKvetch558]

The "fins" you were wondering about at around 4:15 are vertical stabilizers...and yes, a LOT of military combat planes have been designed with twin vertical stabilizers...which are often just called "twin tails".

[@steeljawX]

No, the loud knob in the corner yapping on has got it right. It's them fin like thingies at the back of planes, or at least I believe that's the proper Latin term for them.🤣

[@johnm642]

Anyone comparing American and Russian current gens need to also remember Russians are air SUPERIORITY, Americans are Air SUPREMACY. There is a major difference. Superiority means dominating in air to air where supremacy means your blowing up all their shit before they can get off the ground.

[@CaseyCollier]

The U.S. has had air superiority fighters for a while (some of the best in the world, in fact), and if you think they haven't been focusing on that aspect of aerial combat, then you haven't been paying attention to American aeronautical developments for the past 50-60 years. I'd argue the Russians aren't very close to developing an equivalent plane either, if for no other reason than their industry failing to meat production and quality standards. Their country also can't afford to develop and manufacture fifth generation fighters in any significant number either, so what little fighting prowess their planes may have is wasted because they couldn't field them in any militarily relevant quantity.

[@real_King_Kill]

@@CaseyCollier i would argue that the US might have good aircrafts, but its most likely for show. Why would i say that, because...the american doctrines, of fighting an enemy, has changed since the end of the cold-war. Nowadays your strike capability is mainly based on the Carrier-groups and the 100+ outposts around the world. Which means quick responds and then backed by supplies. Yeah that might have worked in the middle east, but what about an advanced nation ? Thats why i have a problem with people who`re thinking like an old cowboy. Russia is and always has prepared for an attack of its motherland. Napoleon tried and uncle Adolf as well and they failed. Russia is way more advanced in electronic warfare as many would think, which they showed a couple of times. Reeper drone got hijacked and safely landed (not the one with the fuel incidence). The USS Donald Cook got buzzed in 2014 by a Su-24, armed with only EMP equipment. Imagine you go to war and your fancy toy gets shut off by a single mouse-click. Bottom-line of russian defens is, i shoot you, before you even can see me. Example...official numbers of the S-500 range are 600km, that means they see your F-35 (about 200km visual range) and F-22 way ahead of the game and it doesn`t matter if an AWACS (400km visual range) is in the air. The SU-35 has a visual range of 400km. A Patriot system has an operational range of about 160km. I don`t know why people can`t do the math. Right now russia is, probably, using Ukraine has a testing ground for their weapons and advancing them probably each day. Hypersonic missiles are flying around without a chance of getting stopped. Glide-bombs are taking out Patriot systems. Bradleys, Leos and some M1 Abrams got grilled and and and. I`d say some is showing that western equipment isn`t worth a diam. Russia took full control of the military sector a long time ago, while the US doesn`t or were the Generals in a Congregational hearing lying ? That hearing was quite interesting, because of two points which they said, not me. Combat readiness of the F-35 fleet is below 35% out of 100%. Lockheed Martin owns every plane, cause the USAF doesn`t have excess to software or maintenance, so each time it goes to Lockheed. Someone`s making a hell of cash over there. If you`re wondering if russia can afford planes, i would say yes, because (as an example) a single F-35 costs around 150-200 Million dollars, a Raptor F-22 143 million dollar per plane (it`s actually 350m). A Su-35 is at 85 Million dollars. The SU-57 just around 40-50 Million dollar. This numbers are official and can be found on the internet. So no worries about russia look more to the US and how the industrial complex sucks the american taxpayer dry. Funfact..are people really believing that Stealth is a thing ? I mean an object needs space in its environment to be there. An airplane moves the air around it to get that space. Do we really think no one has figured that out yet and possibly adjusted it`s radar system ? But it sounds so fancy. Lately China claimed that they have the hypersonic missile technology, too. I don`t know if anybody has gotten the news, but the Pentagon or some important agency came out with a report and it said basically (not quoting here). If China should invade Taiwan and the US Navy would send a carrier-group to the shore of China, it would be destroyed because of the hypersonic missile advantage. Instead of looking for who has the biggest BigMac, we should pray for that this will never be put to the test, cause even the dumbest person on earth should know that the result is the A solution. Politicians won`t fight for what they caused, no its us. Keep that in mind. My intention was not to offend you, if so, i apologize.

[@CaseyCollier]

@@real_King_Kill My man... very little of what you have said is actually true. I could get into a whole debate with you about each talking point you've laid out, but we'd be here all day. The bottom line is Russia's economy isn't doing well at all (especially after having a decent percentage of its oil refinement plants destroyed in recent attacks), so expecting them to be able to fund massive military R&D projects like the SU-57, "Checkmate", and T-14 is unrealistic. How many SU-57s have been produced so far? 32 with ten being used as test aircraft. Meanwhile, the U.S. has produced 187 combat ready F-22s and over a 1,000 F-35s have been built with 990 currently being fielded by the U.S. and its allies. Even if Russia's so called 5th generation planes were superior, which I highly doubt, they'd be militarily irrelevant because there's so few of them to field that they'd get shot down by an overwhelming force. That's not even getting into pilot training an all of the other factors involved in aerial combat, which NATO countries are highly adept at. I think it's time that you face the facts and understand just how outmatched Russia would really be in an all-out war with the U.S. and its allies. Heck, Russia's been having tons of trouble dealing with a smaller and supposedly less advanced nation such as Ukraine for the past two years. Why, on Earth, would you believe that they could handle the United States in all-out warfare. I don't like underestimating enemies, but this war in Ukraine has made it pretty clear to me that Russia would get steamrolled by NATO if the allied nations were actually trying. Even if they were just up against the United States, they wouldn't fare very well at all. As for China, they may have sizable troop numbers, but so did Russia and look how that has ended up for them. Ultimately, quantity may have a quality all its own, but it isn't the "end all be all" of military capability. You mentioned how China and Russia have "hypersonic" missiles. So what? Would they actually be effective in combat? I'd argue that they wouldn't be because their maneuverability is significantly reduced from normal missiles, which makes them easier to track and shoot down. Why would I say this? It's because the AA systems the U.S. uses like the Patriot that you're so convinced are inferior can track targets using highly advanced radar systems, such as AESA (which was fielded in 2017 and isn't even the most up-to-date tracking system the U.S. has anymore). Do you know what's faster than hypersonic speeds? The speed of current generation radar. If a bullet is traveling at me with speeds in excess of 5x the speed of sound, but it can't maneuver and is over 160km away (that's an official number, which is always going to be less than what it's actually capable of), then all I'd need to do is track it, determine its trajectory (where it'll be when my highly maneuverable missile gets there), and shoot it down. People act like "hypersonic" is this new technology that's only recently been achieved, when in actuality, we've had it since ICBMs have been around. This isn't some "new" thing that the U.S. hasn't designed its anti-air systems to deal with. We've had plenty of decades to develop the technology. What makes you think it'd fail now, given all of the R&D that has gone into making them affective against ICBMs?

[@ШамвилРамазанов]

@@CaseyCollierПри ударе по нефтяным базам,цены на нефть поднимаются,что в итоге становится ещё выгоднее продавать нефть из России.Гиперзвуковые ракеты есть почти у всех стран,но разница в скоростях что она развивает,а скорость российских ракет сейчас самая высокая,и это говорит даже не Россия а западные страны.

[@ШамвилРамазанов]

@@CaseyCollier На счёт,Су 57 этот самолёт ждёт окончательную обкатку нового двигателя,на него ставили несколько модификаций двигателей, несомненно это очень сложно,поэтому на разработку порою уходит все больше времени,в связи с новыми технологиями и возможностями,это уже не 1990 года, и даже не 2000 года,сейчас гораздо сложнее. И даже США потребуется лет 10 мин минимум на новые разработки. На счёт Украины,она готовилась к этой войне больше 8 лет,сооружая доты,окопы,вооружаясь до зубов,и воевали они с помощью запада, именно НАТО во всем помогало ,и даже спутниковое слежение и связь,и много чем другим. Поэтому получается Россия воевала против всего запада ,запад использовал Украину как площадку для войны против России,очень много танков подбито как американские абрамсы ,так и леопарды,и прочую технику запада,Россия с каждым днём улучшает свою технику и способ войны,поэтому ситуация переломлена. Хоть у США будет 20000 ф 35 ,и 100 авианосцев им это не поможет ,у России самое мощное ядерное вооружение. Да и ф 35 ,имеет кучу технических неполадок,очень дорогое вооружение и обслуживание,да и чего говорить об огромной коррупции обороны США ,всё это фантики.

[@georgemutegeki2852]

F22+ f35= Russian su57 22+35=57

[@Mr_McAlex]

Ахах 😄😄👍👍

[@jonoircosta4572]

Excelente 😂😂😂😂

[@коллекцияклоповналюбойвкус]

😅

[@andrewmad2890]

Это не просто самолёт, это шедевр!

[@Tyler-2A-USA]

The Su-57 got its name from the F-22 and F-35, the Russian's claim that the Su-57 is better then the F-22 and the F-35 combine..... hence the 57..... 22 + 35 = 57 making the name Su(sticking the the Russian name) and the number 57 for being "better" then the combine aircrafts.

[@ActuallyJamie]

The fins on the nose of like the Eurofighter are the Canards/Kinards.

[@greggreg9514]

Украина может записать на свой счет еще и 3 имперских "разрушителя", 1 "звезду смерти" и истребитель Дарт Вейдера😂😂😂

[@eliaskrizmanic986]

2:36 2:51 brooo! Seriously, you literally said am I getting good at this? … lol😅

[@ActuallyJamie]

The A-50 is Russians version of the E2 Hawkeye early warning system. It's a flying air traffic controller/command center/ overwatch of the airspace over a huge distance.

[@Shamankzn]

This is hillarious! Ukraine claims they are winning, Russia is fighting with shovels and washing machine chips, and this dude believes everything he reads.

[@ActuallyJamie]

Fun fact about Russian air force doctrine is that they don't train to be in a defensive roll, like US and allies train each other by "fighting" each other. Russias way of thinking is you don't need to defensive if you're constantly on the offence.

[@Mgaming61]

I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not cause that clearly isn't the case. Russian Air Force primarily is for defence.

[@beng7844]

Not sure if that’s true, otherwise why would they ever perform patrols then? I think you’ve bitten off a bit too much anti-Russian propaganda, and that’s coming from a guy who watches daily Ukraine FPV drone combat footage

[@ActuallyJamie]

@@beng7844 Feel free to look up their air force donctrine for yourself.

[@ActuallyJamie]

@@beng7844 Feel free to look it up yourself. Chris from Task and Purpose did and found their war doctrine "book" or whatever it's called

[@jamesgeorge2852]

It's funny how iran is still using the F-14 Tomcats it purchased from the USA back in the 70's

[@КонстантинКорчмар]

for the West and Israel, it is better for it to remain this way, but unfortunately for you, everything will soon change and the United States will be ousted from the east as well as from Afghanistan.

[@PedjoGT]

If you want record score...F 22 have the worst...one Chinese baloon

[@argoswaits2084]

A main reason behind flying low is different from what was said at the end of the video. The low flying is mostly to protect the fighters from the SAM net in that theater. Multiple friendly fire shoot downs have been reported on both sides due to SAMs

[@cagiestnickle72]

The "fins" are vertical stabilizers (i call them rudders sometimes bc of boat knowledge) and the back one's that controll the pitch are elevators. And finally the one's that get the plane to roll are called ailerons. There's flaps too but those just provide more lift. There's all the main flight controll surfaces for you my friend.

[@Fallen_Blade]

Well, nothing is invincible and if there were such a creation then there would be no war

[@vicklogs]

What about Nuclear Bombs? Are they not invincible weapon? Is there a war still?

[@VujaklijaG]

In war it is normal to lose equipment, Ukraine has the most modern air defense systems, if the parties in war, use aircrafts they must expect losses, the US lost an F117 99’ in Serbia, an aircraft that was considered invisible.

[@alexkor380]

Russian Su-35 performs this maneuver in real flight at an air show. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXfXY3t3pZyZftE And in this video, the Su-35 also performs aerobatic maneuvers: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJzWZ4eKe9iaos0 attention to 6:25 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnXWfGmIhs-qrqM from '2:04

[@divyanshkumarrana1104]

Not like american plane have not been shot down before😂😂

[@MichaelScheele]

The F-35 has a single engine; the F-22 has two engines.

[@beng7844]

The F-35 is also called Fat Amy for a reason

[@MichaelScheele]

@@beng7844, I assume because of its proportions...LOL. It's a multirole aircraft (i.e., fighter/attack = F/A), hence Fat Amy.

[@CaseyCollier]

@@beng7844 ...and? That wouldn't stop it from decimating any plane Russia could field.

[@beng7844]

@@CaseyCollier that’s… entirely irrelevant. You ok?

[@CaseyCollier]

@@beng7844 How so? To me, it looked like you were criticizing the F-35 by using an unfavorable nickname. I simply decided to respond with a counter point that rebuffed what you said. It doesn't matter how "fat" or "slow" the F-35 may be. It doesn't win fights by dogfighting, so that sort of argument is irrelevant to a conversation of whether or not it's an objectively effective fighter. It clearly is, which is why I responded to your comment.

[@johngould2665]

You can tell by the canopy on them

[@gabz2803]

no evidence for them shooting down planes... anyone can type of anything on the internet with out any evidence... lol

[@artistphilb]

Most combat is happening at long range, Mig 31's have been effective for this, they're not super manoeuvrable just very fast and carry long range missiles

[@johngould2665]

I’m sure the F-22 can see that F 35 easily

[@seanmnew]

There's likely a reason I don't understand, but seemingly 1 engine = 1 tail fin. 2 engines = 2 tail fins

[@bendrtitanov9065]

This is an element of the aircraft's tail, designed to ensure the stability of the machine along the sliding angle. The stabilizer also increases the stability of the aircraft during yaw (angular movements of the aircraft). The design of the vertical stabilizer can include from 1 to 3 keels. They are located both parallel to each other and in the shape of the letter "V". Specifically, the 2-keel shape of the vertical stabilizer is used extremely rarely and for the most part is characteristic of combat fighter aircraft.

[@ryantaylor3073]

No that’s an f22 😂

[@skullrevenant9573]

Bro su35 is a great plane against any other planes even some 5gens.F22 is the best fighter in the world no doubt.But only US has them.

[@bluflaam777LSA]

@@skullrevenant9573 6 SU-35s have been shot down by Ukraine already. they aren't as good as they're being touted as. Dangerous? Sure any aircraft is or can be...but the su35 isn't what RU is claiming them to be 4++++++++ ad nauseum. Every modern aircraft can 'see' them and down them before the su35 can even get close enough to do anything. SU35 will never see it coming until it's too late.

[@kotor1892]

​@skullrevenant9573 wrong, su 57 is the best. 6 radars, hypersonic weapons, and a massive thrust to weight ratio.

[@skullrevenant9573]

@@kotor1892 F22 has far better stealth while su57's stealth is questionable at best.F22 can shoot down su57 without ever being seen.

[@kotor1892]

@skullrevenant9573 Man, we don't know a lot about su 57's stealth. All we have are estimates.

[@MishaFg]

For someone who says he has experience, you sound as an amateur: you have foregotten about such a thing as air deffence. The US never faught anyone who has it where as Ukraine has (had) the soviet legacy air deffence system whitch is capable of shooting down the most advanced aircraft, and they are good at using it.

[@badidneem]

its amazing how wrong can you be

[@johngould2665]

They have 15 has vertical straight up and down and the F 35 and F-22 have it on a little bit of an angle to defeat radar

[@Djerrko]

Eurofighter, Rafale got single vertical fin. And are both dual engine jets. F16 and gripen also got single vertical fin and a single engine jets

[@johngould2665]

Also The Russian version has very large he signatures

[@bmmcgregor3]

"am i getting good at identifying aircrafts" as hes wrong lmao

[@Roman4574]

В СССР было принято обозначать самолёты чётными номерами-бомбардировщики/транспортники,а нечётными,соответственно,истребители/штурмовики.

[@madhavjha1178]

You can say that because America or Europe didn’t dare to provide their jet to Ukraine otherwise you couldn’t dare to say this 😂😂

[@91099Babar]

5:52 .... Study the books on Manufacturing Technology & Management . Operational Research books may help u develop a core concept of Itemization and Inventory . Goto their Websites & provide you pdf docs on Plane Itemization process .

[@willracer1jz]

8:26 Iran hasn't received any SU-35 yet because Russia had to deliver those planes to the Russian Air Force to replace its losses in Ukraine.

[@piuswanyaga8361]

The problem is that Westerners are led and blinded by hate rather than rational or objectivity. If you think Russia has inferior fighter planes, Us and his vessels should have provided their jets loong time ago, or perhaps use their jets inside ukraina

[@ActuallyJamie]

Those "fins" are called Kinards. If you think Russian jets look like US jets check out the Chinese J20, and J35, and their new Stealth bomber (can't remember what it's called off the top of my head) but they are way to familiar.

[@iKvetch558]

If you mean the fins he was talking about at around 4:15...he was looking at the twin vertical stabilizers that have become so prevalent....at 4:24 he specifically says that the F-15 had the fins he was talking about, so it could not have been canards that he was talking about. 👍

[@ActuallyJamie]

@@iKvetch558 It was when he was looking at the Eurofighter those fins on the front of the nose

[@iKvetch558]

@@ActuallyJamie When he looked at the Eurofighter, it was when he wondered which plane that he was thinking of only had a single fin...and then after he saw the Eurofighter he confirmed that it was the one he was thinking about...so the fin he was looking at was the vertical stabilizer. You can see the sequence starting at 4:26 that clearly indicates this. Yes, the Eurofighter has canards...but he was not wondering about those...at least not in that segment. It is possible I missed him wondering about fins on the front of planes later in the video, if you have a different time stamp to reference.

[@dochammer3047]

Looks exactly like a upscaled Mig

[@TopHatCat1989]

The SU 35 isn't a bad piece of kit, but the problem for Russia has always been pilot training and doctrine. In comparison NATO has more than double the flight hours in training and constant practice under the most challenging conditions for their pilots, while Russia has been sending and losing instructors in Ukraine.

[@MichaelScheele]

Russian aircraft also have less support from other assets. Ukraine shot down one of Russia's few A-50 Mainstay early warning aircraft, so the Russians are keeping their remaining A-50s safe in Russian airspace. Unfortunately for Russia pilots, that means those early warning aircraft cannot provide much assistance.

[@bluflaam777LSA]

@@MichaelScheele UA has shot down 2 A-50s (in the same area) and hit one on the ground with a drone. The most RU had were 7-9 (claimed) I believe it to be closer to 7 with the others acting as parts bins. No matter, losing 2 and maybe a third (even for a time) is a huge loss. That was in FEB so even if they got the damaged one going again it left a big hole of a blind spot for RU. Going from 7 to 4 hurts.

[@MichaelScheele]

@@bluflaam777LSA , I had forgotten the Ukrainians had downed more than one A-50. Unless they want the remaining aircraft to be unavailable in the east, they will only be able to spare one or two in the west.

[@bluflaam777LSA]

@@MichaelScheele They can't make any more. They literally can't afford to lose any more. They don't have the money and can't get the tech needed to build them. I agree with you. RU is in a conundrum.

[@everypitchcounts4875]

That's because Egypt receives military aid and humanitarian aid from USA.

[@poornalingam6261]

lol.. soon ukraine will claim shooting down UFO's as well..

[@FelixSamulevich]

It can be very nice if development of civil aircraft can go out from Flaying sausages in the sky

[@everypitchcounts4875]

A-12 avenger ii could have been the Navy's stealth attack aircraft if they didn't screw it up. NASA F-18 HARV with thrust vectoring

[@string_fellow_hawk]

❤ Cant wait to see the Mead . 😂😂❤❤

[@FelixSamulevich]

I believe in development of SU 57 they made the same mistake when introduced too much angles lines with mix of increasing surface It started to be like flying plywood . Su 35-37 best .

[@steeljawX]

I don't know if this is AI narrated, but I feel like it is. About 5:59 your video or 1:57 the actual video, the guy says that the plane has been dubbed the Flanker E by "the Nah-doh".......It's really hard in my opinion to screw up NATO with how prevalent it's been lately. It'd be like some how pronouncing Russia as "Rus-SIGH-ah." It's obvious easy mistakes like that that tip me off that more likely than not, the voice speaking is probably an AI reader and not an actual person. Again, there's just certain things that you would know how to pronounce all the time if you're into military stuff. Want to run a test, ask the channel that made this to make a video about the M1 Carbine and see how consistent the pronunciation of Carbine is.

[@jonoircosta4572]

F22 passou vergonha para abater um simples balão 😂😂😂😂😂

[@jonoircosta4572]

Um simples balão que Não revidava a injusta agressão, imagina se o balão revidasse teríamos um F 22 abatido com certeza kkkkkkkk

[@oTNTo]

6:45 so for every Russian fighter jet you asking for combat record yet F-22 only engagement was against Chinese weather ballon, ballon almost got him. And yet you think that is the best fighter in the world?!?! What is wrong with your heads?

[@bluflaam777LSA]

As of FEB UA has shot down 6 SU-35s and 25 SU-34s and 2 A-50s (with one being damaged on the ground by a drone).

[@piuswanyaga8361]

according to whose claims. Ukraine lie alot you can never trust their claims. The fact that most westerners support Ukraine, they wholeheartedly accept whatever comes from them..

[@Lfcsweden-n5m]

All shot down by the ghost of Kiev right? ;)

[@SbrGrendel65]

There wouldn’t have been sanctions on Egypt if Russia would have not invaded Ukraine in 2014. It’s funny how much Russian and Chinese military equipment looks like an American Jet, Tank or what ever item they copied 😂

[@АндрейМартынов-ь3ц]

Why didn't America impose sanctions for the coup in Ukraine? Oh wait...

[@marcostorres606]

22 + 35 = 57

[@marcusallen35]

Could you please make a reaction video to the combat record of the F16 fighting falcon?

[@friendlyreptile9931]

The SU-35 faces modern Nato weapon systems while the US always attacked nations with like 50y old stuff and farmers with AK's, that's why they look that good.

[@willracer1jz]

Most of the high-end russian aircraft losses (SU-35, SU-34, SU-30, and A-50) in Ukraine have been lost to advanced surface-to-air systems like the Patriot system and other provided by wester countries and not by air to air (aircraft vs aircraft) victories.

[@Lfcsweden-n5m]

Tbh, ever since the ghost of Kiev story I have a hard time taking Ukrainian claims seriously 😮 Not saying they aren’t true but the track record of Ukraine posting realistic claims are quite low ;) If they say 10 has been shot down it’s most likely 1 or 2.

[@aklizach5746]

ALGERIA IN AFRICA ALREADY HAVE IT SINCE 2022

[@dannye6912]

*Claims

[@АнатолийРайн-б4ы]

На Украине когда забивают 1 самолёт говорят что сбили 20,короче врут безбожно. И потери бывают в любых конфликтах, тем более тако интенсивности. Они тратили 5-7 ракет патриот на один самолёт Су 35 ,а сколько истребителей производства США смогут сбить русские если они будут летать на таких же высотах как Су,а не прижимается к земле?

[@billchmelik5697]

That is an f22

[@adamschmolzi7106]

It even says f22 on the video mate

[@lars2007]

Another Russian aircraft that looks just so right for the job it was designed for

[@hordegaming4771]

I can remember playing DCS in a simulation of what if the Syrian war went WW3? And drew the "short straw" and was on Russias side. Little did I know how much I'd adore the SU27 33 and Mig35 which me and a friend used to drop smart bombs from 65,000ft on the USS Gerald R Ford, yes that Gerald R Ford 😂. Obviously DCS isn't 100% accurate but it apparently gets fairly close so do not underestimate the Russian Fighter Jets as I did before playing with them

[@jonoircosta4572]

Vários f35 dos EUA apresentam falhas graves, muitos acidentes com perdas dos aviões,teve um que voou por horas sem o piloto na cabine, que caiu depois que o combustível acabou, então os EUA não estão tão bem com seus aviões de 5° geração

[@randycurtiss6147]

I love it when people try to come to Russia's Aid with their propaganda😂. Especially since there has never been a conflict involving Russia or the Soviets when they have had air superiority. And the best way to know they're not a threat is because the narrator says that it's the best aircraft until the F-22 which was in service in 2002 and the Russian plane didn't enter service till 2015 which means it was never a superior aircraft at any point in time. The US always has air superiority in every conflict it's been in

[@factyz1373]

Ukraine has shoot down more than 2 su 35s but it happens in wars and don't forget ukraine has top western air defence systems like patriot. But it doesn't make sense to think su 35 is bad. Same with western weapons get shot down by Russia like patriot

[@EG_Soul_Reaver]

From what I can see (though I'm not sure how recently the list was updated as the original person doing the list stopped), A total of 7 SU35s have been visually confirmed as being shot down, with the first one being back in April of 2022, which was before they really had any major anti air systems like Patriot, meaning it was flying low enough to be shot down with a manpad. As to gathering any intel from them, I do believe that the debris from at least two of the SU35s that were shot down early in the war were sent to both the UK and US for study.

[@riccccccardo]

The way su 57 got its number. The f35 + f22 = su57. 22+35= 57 thank me later. 👍🏾

[@johngould2665]

They should be looking into building a better fighter aircraft that’s fifth generation, but they can’t afford it

[@bluflaam777LSA]

They've been trying to for 10yrs. They keep running into technical difficulties. Cost overruns and tech supply issues. Especially now as you allude to. The ruble isn't worth a literal dime.

[@nobody_dude]

SU57

[@Dozervlz]

Не ну с Ф35 и Ф22 лоханулся чувак))

[@drcruelty]

Russia is well known for exaggerating the capabilities of all their military systems. The SU-35 and the rest of the SU-27 variants are capable aircraft, however. Pilot training is likely to be the biggest weakness. It would appear 6 have been lost in the current conflict, with at least one of those being a friendly fire incident.

[@zrikizrikic9126]

Actualy f117 was jnicked with old soviet equipment..so yeah ..during NATO terrorist campaign VS serbs..like a lot of planes f16 were damaged .like a lot..and cant compare ukraine PVO with s300 ect ..so basicly USA planes Arent really battle tested VS decent opponents..

[@drcruelty]

@@zrikizrikic9126 the F117 was only hit because someone got lazy and assigned the same flight paths repeatedly over and over. If you keep going in the same place they can hit you with a rock if they have to.

[@zrikizrikic9126]

@@drcruelty actualy there were 2 hit and one damaged .on fell in temporary nazi stare croatia,one in Serbia and one was damaged..and spirit of missury was damaged b2..so a lot of lazy dudes there..but not lazy to later hover over 18000 f to avoid rockets,which were old soviet type.which Is Point of comment .and btw there was serbs at aviano who literaly call when planes took off ,Spies..and there was some decent people back there who actualy give data what what kind of payload Is on plane so you Can Guess what Target Is most like to be attacked..ect..so it Is not black and white as you say .actualy that NATO terrorist attavk was clusterfuck military..cluster bombs on towns radioactive DU ammo into riverbeds..literaly war crimes genocide .all that shit to destroy two tanks and one AA system and few trucks...overall bully crimes terrorism

[@aklizach5746]

BRO THATS WHY SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA AND ASIA BUY RUSSIAN CHEAP AND EFFECTIVE CHECK THE PRICE AND IF YOU BUY YOU DONT NEED TO WAIT 10 OR 20 YEARS

[@АндрейКалмаков-ы9м]

1. Массовое производство! 2.ремонто пригодность! 3.простота в использование! 4.адоптация под любые военные действия! Что из перечисленного есть в технике НАТО??? 😂😂😂 Су 34 это автомат Калашникова мире самолётов!!! И так в любой Российской военной технике!!! 😂😂😂

[@eastonnida8213]

They’re actually shit compared to American planes. Really good compared to most of the world but shit compared to the US. Especially when you consider that dogfighting is nonexistent in modern warfare

[@mab2187]

Series of sexiest jets to ever fly: 1. Berkut 2. Flankers and Felon 3. Tomcat.

[@ActuallyJamie]

Both the SU-34/35 Have been shot down during the Russo/Ukrainian war. Russia has shot down a decent amount of their own 😂

[@georgemutegeki2852]

There is no plane that cannot be shot down!!!!

[@unstoppable1727]

Any plans can get shot down bro. That literally doesn't mean anything. Lol

[@ActuallyJamie]

@@unstoppable1727 Never said there was a plane that was invincible. I was just informing Luke what the situation was over in that conflict.

[@unstoppable1727]

@@ActuallyJamie right but it just sounded like your were trying to downplay it compared to other aircraft. I specifically haven't heard of them shooting down their own aircraft except for Ukrainian planes that were purchased from Russia before the war. But here in the last month we've seen an extreme increase in air to ground bombings so idk what's up with Ukrainians air defense but they're starting to lose control of that.

[@munnychinni5386]

Even American fighter jets can also shoot down. 😂😂😂😂

[@jonoircosta4572]

Equipamento militar dos EUA tem muita propaganda 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@johngould2665]

They over emphasize how good their planes are when they’re actually not that good and they don’t have that many

[@richardwirt3193]

F - 22

[@mike.47]

As proven by Mr. Putin, looks aren’t everything. Russian military is just a joke. I live close to RAF Lakenheath where F15e and F35a are based, they train every day.

[@Lita1]

It's a nice toy... there's better...but it's...yh it's a good one...I liled this video yes!!!!👍😅 #ThereAreMsnyMoreToys🚀🤖 #BidAndYouGet💰💵

[@LjubomirZuna]

AFU lies,they have nothing done.

[@JONHWAR]

No it's not on pair with the Eurofighter it's far superior . The SU35S is the Best 4th gen fighter . It's so superior in all categories it's superior to the F22 5th gen fighter .

[@friendlyreptile9931]

The F-22 is in fact not better than the Eurofighter. Many trainingmissions have shown that but you can't tell americans the truth about that b.c. they think "made in usa" = best even if the reallity is another thing.

[@asatechnics8363]

why is su-57 such a high number ? do the math ... 35+22 ...... russians are funny to say the least ^^

[@ROBOTRIX_eu]

..ukranian claims..riiiiight..

[@davidfine9323]

A mig 21 from India shot down a Pakistan f16s

[@johngould2665]

Imagine what an F 15 can do to these things it would not be a fair fight at 15 would win every time and that’s older generation aircraft

[@ДенисМацкевич-п7ь]

су 24 и су 25 сбили, а кричат буд-то Российскую авиацию положили. На этих самолётов не было систем продиводействия!!!!!!!!!! это штурмовики! если в голову залезет, то поймёте!!!!!!

[@minthihakyaw3311]

Numbers shown by Ukarine or Russia are not trust worthy. Weapons that Su35 carried can take down enemy beyond visual range. Some say Russian air defense systems take down their own planes due to misunderstaning. Ukarine and Russia use almost the same airframe aircraft (like bothside use AK and both ex USSR) that could be tricky for Russia ADs. F22(fifth gen fighter) have never use in combat situation and even lost several times in dog fight to F16 which is not even 4 generation. fighter

[@sonderblazer951]

Well, it was shot down in Ukraine, but it wasn’t by Ukrainians 😂, a patriot system did it and those are not controlled by Ukrainians 😅

[@aklizach5746]

BROTHER BUY TESLA U WILL BE IN THE WAITING LIST BUT BUY BYD YOU WILL BE SERVED RIGHT THE WAY CHEAP AND BETTER THEN TESLA BY THE WAY IT COSTE 20 000 US DOLLARS HERE

[@Dimkazaz]

Su-35 is probably the best 1 to 1 fighter in the air...

[@sahasrangshuchanda7214]

I don't understand having all the technologies and Hollywood special forces America didn't win a single war after world war 2 that too using atom bomb cowardly .with all alies and technology they failed in Afganistan. They were kicked off ..😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@serkantan5518]

Su 35 is 100000 times better than f35