Sec 10 and 11 (case law study)

[@dronacharyashorthandacadem1642]

Teacher ho to aap jesa ho Kai video dekhi KZbin per but aapki video lambi hai lakin kaam ki yahiii hai This country really needs teachers like you Always we appreciate

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Welcome ji

[@bubblegumchubblegum8837]

Sir, I paused the lecture and laughed for a minute on that maine law kar liya hai, kahi job nahi lag rahi hai joke. Too relatable.

[@Ays67djd]

Where

[@OnLexWay]

Yes 🙌 I also laughed very much 😂

[@SHALINI-TheDancingLight]

@@Ays67djd 49:25😅

[@biswapattanayak7407]

Sir , your notes are so helpful for my upcoming judiciary exams and the way you makes them are outstanding.Proud to have a teacher like you.Thank you so much.

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Thank you for ur positive response

[@salonisharma8401]

Amazing lectures ..... Waiting for constitution series desperately thank U sir 🙏🙏 best teacher of my life ...

[@pratishtha-nr7ne]

Me also my crpc as well as cpc ache ho gai bus sir ki wjh se ☺️ thank you so much

[@My_lyf99]

Amazing lecture

[@khushendusharma2878]

Shandar sir g

[@mahaparaahmed]

Thank you so, sir, for detailed and informative video 🙏

[@kirankashyap943]

Nice way of teaching 👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Thank u

[@sudhanshusingh2437]

Sir u'r videos of evidence and cpc are very helpful......... Huge respect for U🙏🙏🙏 Plz make videos on CRPC as well🙏🙏

[@karishmashaikh1202]

Thanq so much sir..we r blessed to have u..

[@shivaniNimade09]

Very well explained sir..👏👏

[@shankysethi5393]

Excellent explanation

[@Premanandasahuu]

VERY GOOD CLEARLY UNDERSTAND THANK YOU 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@PreetKaur-sm3rk]

hlo sir gud evening sir just want to know ki jo leading case hai mirza akbar v empror isme jo letters exchange kiye yeh res gestae sec 6 mai bhe toh fall honge including section 10

[@himani6255]

Nice lecturer sir

[@ketangoyal2013]

Sir u can start coaching if u want u are really good.

[@amandubey4013]

Sir, physical presence is required under unlawful assembly then why is plea of alibi not relevent in case of common object ??

[@ProPakistani-r4t]

Nice lecture

[@dushyantsharma5798]

Nice sir

[@200vaibhav1]

sirji can a statement made before magistrate regarding conspiracy be relevant under sec.11 of evidence act? please answer

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

If the accused give the statement before the magistrate then it be fall under sec 164 of crpc or as a confession under evidence act. Magistrates name be mentioned in a list witnesses and be called to prove the statement under sec 164

[@200vaibhav1]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thank you Gurudev

[@AdityaMishra-kd6gr]

🙏🙏🙏

[@shruti-ch1mr]

thank you so much sir

[@muskaanverma8459]

Thanku sir🙂

[@lawgicaliq8788]

Very good lecture sir....ty so much

[@ojaslawclasses4087]

And sir mirja Akbar case Mai Paramore pr Dono section 120 302 lgenge Lekin A And B pr to 120(b ) lgega na only

[@ojaslawclasses4087]

Sir section 10 ka use hm court Mai conspiracy proof krne m krenge ya police investigation Mai use kregi conspiracy ka pta lgane m

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Court me

[@GadiWalaBhaiyaa]

🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@sanjeevverma9789]

👌👌👌

[@satishnalawade3116]

Thanks sir

[@PoojaGupta-nq3wj]

Thnku so much sir 😊🙏🏻

[@ekramahmed4920]

❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏

[@rajnigulia7885]

Sir I have one doubt regarding of this section Kya previous conduct ( forged document ka house me paya jana ) will ke regarding me relevant kyu nhi hoga ..? Agr sec 8 previous conduct ko relevant manta h to ..?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

How can u relate it with the conduct, it's a document against which different sections of ipc are attracted but can't be proved through conduct

[@hustle12345]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Sir I have the same doubt. His conduct or behaviour is that he keeps on making forged documents so does that not make him more probable of making the forged will again?

[@bleedblue0324]

Sir, thanks for your lectures. I have a doubt. Jaisa apne bataya, Reg vs Prabhudas mei there were forged documents, jisko admissible ni mana gya. But in false case, giving false evidence is considered to be relevant. Why is that?

[@ojaslawclasses4087]

Sir section -10 Mai anything said done written before occurrence hone cahiye na ?

[@gauravdadhich9529]

Thank you Gurudev for this wonderful lecture. But a doubt came into my mind regarding nature of injuries. Case Law- SANTA SINGH vs State of Punjab. The witnesses are stating that shot was fired from 25 meters and the doctor is stating that it was a close range? Here medical opinion was preferred. However in one of your lectures your lectures, I cant recall the exact case law, but fact was that a person died after being shot at four times.The dispute was that the witnesses alleged that it took him 1 hour to die while the doctor said the shots are of such nature that he must have died in 5 minutes. If I am not wrong in that case the direct evidence had overridden the medical opinion. Could you briefly differentiate between the two cases. Thank you. Eagerly waiting for your reply 💕💕

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

I have discussed these two cases as they r totally opposite to each other, brother it's the discretionary power of the courts if other evidence r so strong which put the medical opinion in shadow then court may ignore the doctors opinion. Keep in mind that judges r not bound to accept the opinion of experts.

[@gauravdadhich9529]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thank You sir 🙏🙏

[@200vaibhav1]

sirji does evidence under sec 10 includes evidence of civil conspiracy because it, includes the word actionable wrong? please reply

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Can u give me an example of civil conspiracy

[@200vaibhav1]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 civil conspiracy as in law of tort, sorry i don't know the example but word actionable wrong is used so thought in that line

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Conspiracy word is only used in the sense of criminal law

[@200vaibhav1]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 than why the word actionable wrong is used? please answer

[@200vaibhav1]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sirji i have 19th edition of law of evidence by avtaar singh in which it is written sec.10 applies to both kinds of conspiracy i.e civil & criminal i.e why word actionable wrong is used. please explain

[@saumyashankar3658]

सर, आपने 11:49 को बोला "तो कब हुई है एंटरटेन, जब उसने बोला"। मतलब मेरे हिसाब से आप यह बोलना चाह रहे है की "first entertained" मतलब पहली बार कुछ काम किया गया हो उस common intention ke furtherance me। सही या गलत? लेकिन अगर Bare Act का हिंदी अनुवाद देखा जाए तो उसमे लिखा है: "... उस समय के पश्चात, जब ऐसा आशय उनमें से किसी एक ने पर्थम बार मन में धारण किया..."। मेरे अनुसार "first entertained" का मतलब हुआ, पहली बार खयाल आना। Therefore, I humbly request you to please clarify.

[@ardxxxxx]

Thank you so sir... 🙏

[@sabakalimshaikh4215]

Thanks 😊

[@raghvendrachauhan9013]

Sir how can I get ur notes... Please tell me

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

9478294750 whatapp onlt

[@My_lyf99]

Thanku sir g 🙏🏻

[@harshgupta1914]

Sir hame yaha yeh prove karna padhega ki jo will hai vo jally hai ya a ne will jally banvai hai

[@sunildube7774]

Sir1 question h,yadi wife hasbend ki cuplent uske office me karti h,ki vah 2nd marriage ka accused h,or hasbend removed from survis ho jata hai,tab kya wife mentenens ki demand kar sakti h,kya officer dobara wife ki application for peyment,of har husband accept kar sakta h,,,anser pls with case low its humbal request

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Maintenance is her ryt

[@mohdshahrukhqureshi7170]

By watching this video, i am not able to clearly understand the sub section 2 of section 11 of Evidence Act, 1872. Can you please explain it in brief by giving any example..?

[@shreyaseemukherjee4392]

Sir which book are you following for evidence?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

I have made my notes out of 9 books and also prepared according to judiciary papers

[@shreyaseemukherjee4392]

Thank you sir! Sir, can we also procure the copies? Sir please 🙏🏽🙏🏽

[@harshgupta1914]

One thing more agar vo jhooti gawai dene ke habbiatual hai to uski gwai mani ni jaegi ya usko jhooti gwai dene ke liye punish kiya jaega

[@Knowledge__guru222]

❤❤👍

[@Juhisingh-rc6rr]

Sir u/s 34 of IPC Participation is Must. The law requires that the accused must be present on the spot during the occurrence of the crime and take part in its commission..So can it will be an exception of plea of alibi?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

law only required participation and physically person of the accused at the spot, even an accused who was not present at the spot but instructing co-accused on phone how to implement the common intention, also liable for the offence

[@Juhisingh-rc6rr]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 ok Thnq sir for replying🙏

[@sukhanaftab7718]

Thank you.

[@jyoti1204]

sir aapke notes kaise mil sakte hai

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Whatsapp on 9478294750

[@ayushigarg3626]

Sir pls sardul Singh ke facts btado

[@PoojaGupta-nq3wj]

thku sir

[@advsukhisidhu1321]

Thank u sir

[@parulgarg4502]

sir could the share the pdf of notes

[@lawcraze1021]

Sir g ... Sec 10 mein e.g A,B,C nay D k murder ki conspiracy ki and D ko sirf A ny mar diya ...To murder k liye A,B,C liable hain ya sirf A ????

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

If A killed D under the conspiracy than all r liable for murder but if A individually killed D than he is only liable for 302 but others r liable for criminal conspiracy only if they somewhere acted for conspiracy not otherwise

[@lawcraze1021]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thanks sir g ...

[@lawcraze1021]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Sir g ek cheez aur bta dyen plz ..criminal conspiracy agar preparation stage pe pakry gaye offence nai hua abi to tab he prove karty hain ya offence kar k jab pakry gaye tab b? Matlab before or after offence criminal conspiracy prove kary gay?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Anything done, said or written help us to prove conspiracy, so not necessary to commit the offence, if u r apprehend at the initial stage and u done something for the prosecution of the object of ur criminal conspiracy than u r liable under sec 120b of ipc

[@vrushalinarwade6218]

THank u sir

[@bachimishra2515]

Could u pls send notes of evidence

[@lawgicaliq8788]

Sir alibi is improbable or inconsistent?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Highly improbable and totally inconsistent to the fact in issue

[@lawgicaliq8788]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 ty sir

[@bachimishra2515]

Aap ke notes aap pdf me telegram app me de skate how sir

[@SHALINI-TheDancingLight]

49:25 😅

[@lawgicaliq8788]

Sir plz upload admission also...

[@varunsingh545]

sir u forgot to add in s 11 ........ self infliction of harm _/\_

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Ohh sry

[@varunsingh545]

Its ok sir ji...bacche bhot hangama krte h background mein ;p

[@amansaini.678]

please provide notes in pdf it would be more helpful sir . because many things I feel difficult

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Notes on 7 subjects are already prepared so u can avail them by msging on 9478294750

[@mourabpal7472]

🙏

[@T-J-detwailer]

sir samaj mai to aajata hai nots v bana rahe hai magar bad mai bhul jate hai lagta hai ek 2 se 3 baar dekni pade ge ek video😢😢😢

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Revision is necessary

[@T-J-detwailer]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 😀😀😀

[@manojbhushan7401]

u may use INX media case in conspiracy latest case

[@rishi.999]

🙏