excellent explanation. mja ajata h apke lectures sun kr.
@atharali6682 Жыл бұрын
Amazing lecture 👍
@harshajain47755 жыл бұрын
Sir, the way you explain each section with illustrations is really helpful. Thankyou so much for these videos and your efforts. Keep up the good work.
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Thank you Harsha g🙏
@nandlalprihar80342 жыл бұрын
Very nice lectures sir. Evidence made so easy. Could never imagine. Yay !!!! Aakanksha.
@ratanravesh95443 жыл бұрын
Best teacher!! ,thank you for explaining so clearly Sir 🙏🌸
@akashbalyan412 жыл бұрын
Sir.....ur videos really help those who dont have sufficient means to join coaching...god bless u sir....keep making videos more helpful for judiciary purposes.....thnx alot🙏
@karamsingh42794 жыл бұрын
Good lecture thanks sir g
@lalitasharma-ew5rz4 жыл бұрын
Unique lecture Sir
@Rakesh-in8zk3 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir ji
@BIGDD074 жыл бұрын
Wonderful teacher 👨🏻🏫❤️❤️👍
@eksafar73374 жыл бұрын
very very helpful..sir
@rituchhoker63634 жыл бұрын
Very good lecture
@dushyantsharma57984 жыл бұрын
Love you sir shandr
@nishabee-u5v4 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir for helping us...... Hats of sir.... ❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
@gauravdadhich95294 жыл бұрын
Great video like always 💕💕💕
@darshchaudhary66623 жыл бұрын
sir aapne jo vo 2 cases samzae h section 15 me, sir sahi me mazza aagya...
@ProPakistani-r4t4 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@My_lyf993 жыл бұрын
Sir u re great ❤️❤️ lucky to have a teacher like u 😊
@aartidunkhwal55415 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir.☝👌👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@sabakalimshaikh42153 жыл бұрын
Hat's off..👌🎩
@shruti-ch1mr2 жыл бұрын
Good evening sir. sir can you please also explain the word Particular Instances also under sec 13
@harshittiwari7198 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot❤️
@manjushreepattanayak59773 жыл бұрын
Sir could you mention the case laws in the description box...
@muskaanverma84592 жыл бұрын
Thanku sir☺
@maxwax102 жыл бұрын
Sir, in Noor Mohammad case , the idea was to show that in general rule evidence of similar facts is not relevant as it was also not “ Specifically Authorised “ by the Act ( Evidence Act ) itself. Page 110 under heading “ Position under Indian evidence act “ . Thank you for the lecture sir. ✌️😁
@maxwax102 жыл бұрын
Book Batuk Lal*
@muskanbhargav18762 жыл бұрын
Thnkyou sir🙏
@prakasha75142 жыл бұрын
Sir where do you give offline lecture?
@sanjeevverma97894 жыл бұрын
👌👌
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj3 жыл бұрын
thku sir
@sanjeevverma97894 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌👌👌
@priya-zp7zi3 жыл бұрын
Sir transfer of property ki bhi video bna dijiye pls
@dushyantsharma57984 жыл бұрын
Sir section 17 - 22 k video upload kr dijiye🙏
@200vaibhav14 жыл бұрын
sir how can be admission both substantive & weak kind of evidence? please explain & thank you
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Bcz it always need corroboration, it is a law that admission is not a conclusive proof .
@bidishamanna7674 жыл бұрын
Sir ji please provide sections 17-22.🙏
@rrr00z4 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture sir..thank you sir....
@vishalgaur75014 жыл бұрын
Sec . 17 to 22 tak ke video nahi mil raha he? 🤔🤔
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Yet to be uploaded
@vishalgaur75014 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 सर जी आप कि तबियत कैसे है ❤
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
All good
@sumitjoshi3163 жыл бұрын
Section 15 - 52.55
@rishabhpandey60373 жыл бұрын
sir in the case of emperor v panchu das, robbery cant be taken as accidental but sir murder during the robbery can be taken as accidental or intentionally, so why calcutta high court refuse to take the previous evidence, as we see the section 15 as in general.
@GadiWalaBhaiyaa4 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@rishidharattnel41004 жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir
@parmtanwer41623 жыл бұрын
Sir your work is appreciable, but there are something missing for example section 13read with sections 40-44, and comperision between section 14 & 15
@गर्वसेकिसान3 жыл бұрын
Sir I have question regarding section 14 - is motive is also a relevant fact regarding proof of state of mind? Court will consider it or not pls answer sir or anyone can Help
@kirankashyap9434 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@prateekbajaj38464 жыл бұрын
Hello sir, can you please give an example of something that would be admissible under section 14 but not under section 15. Thanks
@anjalipanwar7338 Жыл бұрын
Aap bhut accha bdhate ho But background voice jada aati h
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Жыл бұрын
Will try to improve
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj4 жыл бұрын
Thku so much sir😊🙏🏻
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
Sir g ... sec 12 mein jo facts plaintiff or defendant dyen gay court ko damages determine karny k lye to wo unliquidator damages k case m hoga ya phir jahan specific damages mention hoon e.g contract mein 50 thousand .wahan b dono apny apny facts dy sakty hain specific damages ko kam karny k leye?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
If the damages r already specified than no need to prove, but facts need to prove to determine the damages (unliqitated damages) which r not specified
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thanks sir g ....
@jaspreetmehta0074 жыл бұрын
Agr damages pre defined h to to court vhi damage award kr degi fr usme cout ko determine krne ki kya jarurat hai jab phle se damages define na ho tb sec.12 unliquidated damages ko define krne me court ki help krta hai
@Gargi_512 Жыл бұрын
Sir Can you please teach JURISPRUDENCE also ?🙏🙏🙏
@prinkeshverma19354 жыл бұрын
S.17-22 is missing?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Yet to be added, originally it was deleted during uploading
@bachimishra25154 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 lectures are soo good . I think all evidence lecture are covered can u pls provide notes for the same .it's help
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Will upload at the end
@tanweeransari36614 жыл бұрын
Thnk u sir❤
@prateekgandotra68634 жыл бұрын
Sir 1 small humble request: Please mention the timeline of different order or section in description so that it becomes easier in tracing that particular content.
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
G
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir apne abhi tak sec 17 to 23 upload nahi kiya i m waiting for urs lectures
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Will do
@ritukushwah18033 жыл бұрын
Sir agr intentional act question me hoga to similar act relevat hoga? Or agr accidental act question me h to similar act prove krna jaruri nhi h?? Sir plz answer bhut confusion h
@ritukushwah18033 жыл бұрын
Under section 15
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
Good Morning sir How r u I hope u will be fine Sir admission k kuch topics missing hain unki videos nai hain playlist mein ....
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Diwali ke time par upload kardu GA,
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Ok thankx sir g .we will wait👍
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir damage ko calculate kese karega court ki isko milna bhi chahiye ya nahi agar milega to dono ko milega ya kisko nahi ya kisi or ko or kitna milega
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
If parties failed in determining the damages but it is sured that plaintiff has suffered a loss, than a reasonable compensation be given to him
@adv.kulwindersran51634 жыл бұрын
Sir admission nal related section 17 to 22 v provide kra do plzzz
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Will upload after this act
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir apka next sec 17 nahi hai you tube par
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Yet to be uploaded
@rohitkhatana65454 жыл бұрын
sir .. Is Admission itself a hearsay evidence?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Yes u can say
@surajpandey62404 жыл бұрын
Aur Sir, agar A ne B ko mara, aur prosecutor ye facts la rha h ki A ne pehle C, D, F ko bhi mara h, to ye facts section 14 me relevant ni honge, par Kya section 15 me relevant ho sakte h, q ki vo to in general baat kar rha h???
@surajpandey62404 жыл бұрын
Sir, agar A ne B k bhai ko mar diya aur phir, B ne A ko mar diya, to uska motive jo h revenge ka vo humlog section 8 me prove kar sakte h aur jo state of mind h uska intention, vo hum section 14 me prove kar sakte h. Am I right sir???
@mehmoodrazi83105 жыл бұрын
sir g plz specific relief act pa b lecture bnain
@artishinde73014 жыл бұрын
Sir the sec17 admission . Of evidence act ..there is no lecture series .if possible
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
G Sry, will upload,
@chandankushwaha42144 жыл бұрын
Sir 17 to 22 ke section nhi h playlist me
@prinkeshverma19354 жыл бұрын
Kindly upload...
@HarpreetKaur-bl5ks3 жыл бұрын
Sir tusi jehri ise lecture wich ik eg. Diti si that X is charged with shooting with intent to kill him. The prosection wants to show that X had previously shot at y? Ta sir eh fact relevant hay under sec 14 bcoz it covers explanation 2 . I m little bit confused that whether it covered under 1 or 2 . I think 2 what is your view sir. Plzz reply
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir kab tak sec 17 to23 upload kar doge i m waiting for ur lectures
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir apne abhi tak sec 17 to 23 nahi upload kiya kitna time lagega ur teaching way is too good thats why i will msg u again and again .
@ranjeetsinghcheema20394 жыл бұрын
Sir, sec 17- 22 is not there.
@apooravsingh25243 жыл бұрын
❤️
@kajaldhiman22305 жыл бұрын
good evening guru Ji.🙏 guru Ji.🙏 what is particular instance means here?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
A is charged with shooting at B with intent to kill him. In order to show A’s intent, the fact of A’s having previously shot at B may be proved. This is particular instance but in order to prove A's intention it can't be proved that A earlier also shoot C, D, E, F etc as we r talking about the intention only in regard with B only
@sudhanshu2984 жыл бұрын
Sir Please Upload the Admission and sec 33 to 39 pls pls pls pls
@preetiramchandani28745 жыл бұрын
Sir in these videos so many sections are missing, like sec 17 to sec 22 video is not there. Please upload asap.
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
G sure I will upload it
@chintamanighag93664 жыл бұрын
Sir please upload sec 17 to 22 evidence act lecture
@shivanishrivastava30974 жыл бұрын
Sir, what about explanation 2nd of section 14 As you are saying that previous character is not relevant, but explanation is saying it is relevant under section 14. Please resolve this doubt, Apart from this these lectures are very helpful, thank you so much🥰
@harshgupta19144 жыл бұрын
Sir mujhe sec 13samajh ni aya sir isme agar private property ki baat ki jae ki dad itne salo se is kam ko chala rahe hai or agar 2 brother hai A and B jo ki B ke nam property hai or A sirf dad ke sath kam karta hai shop par to in future agar B kehta hai yeh mera right hai property par to us time par A kya karega ku ki A ke pass to koi proof hai hi nahi ki yeh property uski hai sirf yahi proof hai ki A is a son of his own dad .
@advocatefront31462 жыл бұрын
Hi sir.I am from Pakistan.I need notes of evidence Act.I will be obliged.thanks sir
@harpreetsinghkahlon28272 жыл бұрын
Plz WhatsApp on 9478294750
@advocatefront31462 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir this is not available.is there need of any code?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28272 жыл бұрын
91
@advocatefront31462 жыл бұрын
Sir still there is some problem.
@salonisharma84012 жыл бұрын
One man army 🙏
@himani62554 жыл бұрын
Heloo Sir section 13 how to proof non existence? Pls explain...
@rajneeshrollno_38section_b664 жыл бұрын
Sir ji evidence k notes upload kar do plz sir is week me muje exam dena evidence ka plz plz plz plz..........sir
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
OK will try
@faizanulhasan41474 жыл бұрын
Insurance company soch rahi hai isi ki wife kyun mar rahi hai, yehi itna lucky kyun hai😂. By the way very nice lecture, Sir!
@mourabpal74725 жыл бұрын
🙏
@mehmoodrazi83105 жыл бұрын
nice sir g👍👍
@arpitmishra9404 жыл бұрын
A is accused of murdering a woman X,It is sought to be proved that 2 years ago A murder his wife Y and So had the mens rea to murder X. to sir yha particular instance hi apply hoga? And Explanation 2 b apply hoga ?