Can you do one on the Great 26 Year War currently taken place between my wife and I? In particular, the ongoing "Battle of Closet Space". She occupies 92% of the territory......the bloody conflict wages on.
@07aniketdeysarkar265 жыл бұрын
@james c And that's why you divorced her😂😂😂
@07aniketdeysarkar265 жыл бұрын
@james c I'm sorry.
@driveman64905 жыл бұрын
james c Glad you moved on...... *Now rule your closet with an iron fist and never give up an inch of hanger space again!!*
@07aniketdeysarkar265 жыл бұрын
@james c But it must have been difficult at the beginning.......I mean you loved her , right ?
@07aniketdeysarkar265 жыл бұрын
@james c Oh
@vinvancent5 жыл бұрын
7:48 "The Spanish empire takes a negative view of British domination, Spain then goes to war with France." Yeah well that makes sense
@TheShaneyman5 жыл бұрын
'With' as in alongside
@SirFaceFone5 жыл бұрын
Confused me at first
@markgustaferro10165 жыл бұрын
Yes Britain is dominating so Spain wants to dominate around Britain
@libzbond5 жыл бұрын
That makes no sense, you take a negative view of the enemy of your allie, then declare war on your former ally, awkward
@markgustaferro10165 жыл бұрын
Between Britain Spain and France there all trying to take over and manipulate one another at the end the British won and here comes America
@ffarkasm5 жыл бұрын
Austria: "Good job Russia, we are almost in Berlin. Let's finish the conquest and eradicate Prussia once and for all!" Russia: "You know what? I'm a big admirer of Prussia, I think I just take my army and go home." Austria: "Yo what...?"
@kalyka985 жыл бұрын
Even worse he tried to join forces with the prussians however he was soon overthrowed and his wife took over and went home with the army
@Mrjmaxted02915 жыл бұрын
Austria: "Come on, we're so close to our destination we can't stop now!" Russia: "It wasn't about reaching Berlin, it was about the friends we made along the way"
@mangalores-x_x5 жыл бұрын
Russia and Austria were rival, as were Austria and France which is why their alliance went so pear shaped, they were only on the same side due to fleeting circumstances, not due to strategic alignment. In contrast Britain was interested in colonies and trade which Prussia was no competitor in while Prussia protected Hanover and received Britain's support and money as well protection of her western border in exchange.
@DavesShed5 жыл бұрын
Tsarina Elizabeth hated Prussia and wanted to destroy it. Even their backward army could overrun Prussia by shear numbers. However she was of poor health. Her son and heir admired Prussia and wanted to align with it. This places any Russian General in a quandary. He would have his orders against Prussia from the Tsarina. However he knew that his future Tsar and ruler would be horrified if he succeeded. Hence after defeating the Prussian army, the General made an excuse to withdraw rather than march on Berlin. He claimed he had a logistics problem. Purely self preservation. France also had conflicting strategies. There was the public/official policy and strategy in the interest of France. Then there was the King's secret policy and strategy which was in the interests of his own family. These were sometimes in conflict and undermining each other. Also the British people couldn't have cared less about Hanover. The reason Britain was so deeply involved on the continent, paying mercenaries, was not just colonial rivalry with France. It was that the King of Hanover was made the King of England. So that aspect of British aggression was just the King using Britain's resources for his personal war to protect his personal Kingdom of Hanover. What was going on in Europe is that a few often related nobility were still playing middle age feudal power games for their own egos but in an era of muskets and cannons. Hence 1.3 million dead for quite petty reasons. Sadly this lesson was not learnt and the same outdated and failed thinking continued through the Napoleonic era, and resulted in World War I. The only good thing about it, is that all the competition over so many decades resulted in technical, scientific and engineering advancement.
@henryeberman63424 жыл бұрын
Kalyka 98 and Catherine The Great is from Prussia, continued the alliance and attacked the Commonwealth together
@lieutenantsupascoop21265 жыл бұрын
6:04 France plans to invade Britain Britain: how many times do we need to teach you this lesson, old man.
@Itachi9510005 жыл бұрын
I mean that applies to England/Britain as well. They have tried to invade France many times, even alongside other major powers and almost always failed. The only successful invasion of France by Britain was at the end of the Napoleonic Wars when all the powers of the coalition did.
@eliza19055 жыл бұрын
Florian A. . nobody asked
@Itachi9510005 жыл бұрын
@@eliza1905 And?! I still pointed it out. Do something about it rosbif! lmao
@axelandersson63145 жыл бұрын
Pizza Reed12 1066 times.
@Alaois5 жыл бұрын
@@Itachi951000 England has invaded France Hundreds of times why do you think the North of France was a part of England for some time during the 100 years war
@Gia1911Logous5 жыл бұрын
"Summary of the first world war" Ah, I see you're a man of culture
@Perririri4 жыл бұрын
#BillWurtz
@Black-Sun__x2 жыл бұрын
I think cause it only involved one continent mainly lol
@northwesteastsouth74372 жыл бұрын
@lezanji1884 nope its more world war than ww 1 but not for ww 2
@northwesteastsouth74372 жыл бұрын
@@Black-Sun__x Ww 1 also focused on europe
@Crimsrn Жыл бұрын
@lezanji1884 almost every country was involved in ww2
@BananaMan-sb9rj5 жыл бұрын
Do Napoleonic wars, and maybe the Crimean war
@dcloukey5 жыл бұрын
I second that
@Octoploppy5 жыл бұрын
I'd love to sse one about Crimea
@altairibnlaahad65935 жыл бұрын
Go to epic history for napleonic war
@flyingunicorn39795 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see the napoleonic wars
@kole16785 жыл бұрын
i third that
@axelandersson63145 жыл бұрын
The territories within the HRE weren't all ruled by Prince electors. They were ruled by various nobles and monarchs with titles such as count or Duke, all collectively known as "Princes".
@rossmabon44725 жыл бұрын
Indeed, the only prince electors were the seven electors of the Holy Roman Empire
@MiguelGarcia-si8qi5 жыл бұрын
SUMMON THE ELECTOR COUNTS
@thewizzard37055 жыл бұрын
Among these princes also were high ranking members of the clergy, since they controlled large territories around the city they were seated in.
@rossmabon44725 жыл бұрын
@@thewizzard3705 Indeed one of the Electors is the Elector of Cologne, which was a Bishoph
@olavtryggvason11945 жыл бұрын
@@rossmabon4472 At the time of the seven years war their number had increased to 9 ! There were 9 electors at that time, or in effect 8 since the emperor in Vienna also had the electorship of the Crown of Bohemia in personal union.
@arkhamsquire45035 жыл бұрын
Was really surprised when I realized how complicated this war was. In my schools growing up this climax of european history was dumbed down to "a war between britain and france".
@metalema62 жыл бұрын
School history is the dumbest way of seeing and teaching history
@thepandamc40932 жыл бұрын
Our school never even mentioned this at all
@Rowlph88882 жыл бұрын
Well, if you are going to have a basic summary, then that would be the most accurate one.. just look around you at the world, and most Conflict is a result of squabbling between those 2 powers, or because them messing around territories individually
@bigbadword3 жыл бұрын
The sick beats really capture the mood of the 18th century.
@cuteness513082 жыл бұрын
Really sets the vibe 😂😂😂
@martainjack67385 жыл бұрын
You the only dude to put trap music in a history vid.
@cosmicstargazer109 ай бұрын
It sure helps with making it more accessible to the youngers!
@negativeionz4 жыл бұрын
This was the best explanation of the Seven Years War and French Indian War I have found. The map and simplicity of it all made it very easy to understand. Make more of these.
@lucaspalmaa5 жыл бұрын
The War of Spanish Succession was also a world war with battles all over the World, a would be a fine vídeo as well. Great Work!
@FieldMarshalYT5 жыл бұрын
France didn't really truly decline until after the 7 Years War, sadly Armchair Historians rather shotty (yes, shotty) video on it isn't to be 100% trusted.@Alex Mercer
@nathanc9395 жыл бұрын
The Spanish succession was so so close to beeing won by France. That would have changed so much and probably would have fucked France up in the long run (most likely no revolution and corrupt monarchies for quite a bit longer).
@howardthealien26064 жыл бұрын
And Napoleonic and the The War of The Great
@zamirroa2 жыл бұрын
@@nathanc939 that would have mean the union of france and spanish empire in one single state, holy god, the other kingdoms in europe were just terriorized about it coming true
@why.soooserious5 жыл бұрын
Its just confusing when France and Britain fought each other than become allies than fought than become allies .. Its like having quarrels with your wife
@mostakahmedsimon13045 жыл бұрын
Who is husband? Who is wife?
@nicholasparker20865 жыл бұрын
As an American i view the British as more boring and the French as more dramatic...
@mostakahmedsimon13045 жыл бұрын
@L'Aigle Viva la France. France is the very first country which overthrew monarchy. Am I right,french brother?
@mostakahmedsimon13045 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasparker2086 French are also helpful.
@riparoo96755 жыл бұрын
@L'Aigle britian is the mother hen who has to constantly baby her varying colonies. france is the dad who doesn't care about their kids too much and is busy taking care of shit in their own life (mainland europe)
@manend25 жыл бұрын
Now this is what the relationship of Great Britain and France was like. They wanted to tear each other's throats out. But when someone else tries to tear one of their throats out, they suddenly become bffs.
@VenomSeeker5 жыл бұрын
Enderman_of_D00M I mean that makes sense you’re fighting someone ya hate but then someone you both hate comes at ya of course you’d sign a temporary truce to handle that threat first
@manend25 жыл бұрын
@Alex Mercer Brits and French still wanna have a go at each other, but the modern era is all about no war so their okay with each other
@leonb52195 жыл бұрын
More like putting aside a petty ancient rivalry to deal with present common enemies...
@jamesmacdonald11165 жыл бұрын
the enemy of MY SWORN ENEMY WHO I WILL DEFEAT AT ALL COSTS NO MATTER THE MANPOWER AND RESOURCES, I WILL LITERALLY BANKRUPT JUST TO SPITE THEM, is my friend.
@FaithfulOfBrigantia5 жыл бұрын
Thats how the "the Balance of power" doctrine works
@RealLifeW0rld5 жыл бұрын
I consider the Seven Year's War (French and Indian Wars for Americans) as the FIRST True World War. The Napoleonic Wars as the 2nd World War. The Great War (WW1) as the Third World War. The 2nd Great War (WW2) as the Fourth World War. Because it simply makes sense to classify these wars like this because these all wars were fought on 5 to 7 continents not just one or two like the wars before them.
@TheBluBalls5 жыл бұрын
It's not about where they were fought, it's about how many nations were involved.
@YAH21215 жыл бұрын
The Cold War is just World War 2.5
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
the American War of Independence was a World War of sorts: British, French, Dutch and Spanish navies going at it, Western North America a battle ground and there was a concurrent war against the British in India. Morocco, Prussia and Poland supported the rebellious colonies to some extant and the British employed Hessian mercenaries from Germany.
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
I would also consider the Napoleonic Wars to be more than one World War.
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
@Anglo-Celtic Mega Nationalist Well obviously if you think of just the 13 colonies, but there was also India, Florida, the Caribean, JP Jones's raids of coastal England, and a bunch of naval confrontations between the French and English all over the place. I guess that's not enough continents to really make it a world war, but it was still pretty big. (Though not many casualties). It was big enough that Britain felt the need to re-engineer all their warships in order to deal with so many threats.
@kapekape91605 жыл бұрын
The Sun is brighter the days you upload
@longviewhysteria32325 жыл бұрын
jesus are you stupid
@Geo07ism5 жыл бұрын
Actually if the sun was to become even 10% brighter the oceans would slowly evaporate and most life on earth would die, including humans. It is our individual responsibility to moderate our online postings so that we avoid spreading misinformation. Thank you for your understanding and have a good day.
@kapekape91605 жыл бұрын
@@Geo07ism are you doing anything this sunday night?
@kapekape91605 жыл бұрын
@@longviewhysteria3232 NO R U?
@Geo07ism5 жыл бұрын
@@longviewhysteria3232 I assume it's by chance a question directed to the one and only Jesus ended up in this particular comment. Is Jesus stupid? He could have escaped the Romans I guess, perhaps even prevent Judas from informing them about his whereabouts in the first place, but have you considered that Jesus perhaps knew his time had come to die for everybody's sins? That there was no point in preventing his reunification with his Father? I know I'm not answering your question as enloghtinly as you'd like but you can consider this some food for thought. "Jesus, are you stupid?", perhaps he'll tell you himself soon.
@connor9715 жыл бұрын
Do a video on the hundred year war between England and France
@borivojetravica5695 жыл бұрын
Do a video.... ALL country after war.... "In heavy Debt" to WHO??????? Tax money go to who???
@finlay87815 жыл бұрын
@@borivojetravica569 factories that make guns ammunition etc.
@imahinion5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, In our social studies class we are learning about the Hundred Years War.
@borivojetravica5695 жыл бұрын
@@finlay8781 nope... Banks, owners of every thing
@finlay87815 жыл бұрын
@@borivojetravica569 not quite
@Imperator_Gr5 жыл бұрын
@7:40 I thought that he said Peter the turd instead of Peter the third,which ironically would have been a fitting title for him.
@MelkisgoedvoorJan5 жыл бұрын
Hahaahah
@masonklabunde15505 жыл бұрын
Dying😂
@DrewPicklesTheDark5 жыл бұрын
What was so shitty about him? (No pun intended)
@ajavisk5 жыл бұрын
@@DrewPicklesTheDark First of all, he was german, and admired Prussia. He inherited the throne of Russia because of some bizarre succession laws and prefered to speak german over russian if he could. The war was very costly for Russia and he loved Prussia so much that he fucking allied them and switched sides in the war as soon as he went into power. He was a generally unpopular leader who was overthrown by his wife (Cathernine the Great) soon after his reing started He is not all that bad, however. His reputation has been ruined by his wife, buy some accounts say that he was actually fairly progressive for the time
@deathandcupcakes5 жыл бұрын
@@ajavisk Peter the Great killed his only male heir so the line of succession passed to his daughters. Peter III's mother was one of Peter the Great's daughters.
@GaryWalshDublin5 жыл бұрын
Your history videos really explain everything so well in a short frame
@aksharnarayanan5 жыл бұрын
It's sad to see that you have only uploaded a handful of videos till now. They're very informative, high quality, and the idea of teaching history using animated maps is quite smart and effective. I love your channel and content and hopefully, you'll have more videos up here soon !
@genericyoutubeaccount5795 жыл бұрын
Eastory and Historia Civilis also teach history through maps.
@mikeclancy7415 жыл бұрын
Fantastic work! Thanks for your effort, accuracy, and upload. This war should be studied and documented much more, as it a key to understanding the rest of the 18th century and hence, the foundations of modern history.
@ДеннисЧернышевский5 жыл бұрын
Very nice !! I am just a dirty and weak Russian guy , but : I don't want to force you into something but the rise and collapse of the mongol empire would be great to see. Who has other suggestions for more videos with maps ??
@Deloxly5 жыл бұрын
British / Roman Empire
@ДеннисЧернышевский5 жыл бұрын
@@canag0d Yes we suck as a nation
@政斌-x8k5 жыл бұрын
Why demeanor yourself? Russia is a proud country world stage and is only 2nd to the US. Although, imo ever since the Bolsheviks murdered the Tsar Russia sort of went down hill since.
@zintoroproductions5 жыл бұрын
@@ДеннисЧернышевский much sarcastic
@Freeliner755 жыл бұрын
It looks like your personal perception is projected to the nation as a whole. It would be wiser to keep to your first sentence "I am just a dirty and weak Russian guy" and let cleaner and stronger Russians to speak for the nation.
@jannishorst-dieterdrager34635 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! They are so high quality. Thank you :)
@abenubilous4375 жыл бұрын
Also see Oversimplified channel
@itsjustjoel285 жыл бұрын
Yeah, they’re pretty similar. OverSimplified has more humor, yet Geo History has more facts.
@fathannaufaltrias44545 жыл бұрын
You truly deserve more subs man!
@nathanc9395 жыл бұрын
Russia and Austria: We defeated the prussians, should we take advandtage of it? - Nope, its not like we want to win this war.
@Spinalfields5 жыл бұрын
Oh man Geo History making a new video after I've been rewatching every episode the day prior. Talk about luck!
@victorgabrielbuena5 жыл бұрын
that brief moment in time when Manila was in the British Empire
@yugintaer24204 жыл бұрын
Imagine what could have happened to the Philippines if it was never returned to Spain by Great Britain.
@howardthealien26064 жыл бұрын
Yu Gin Taer oof I’ve been thinking about that I think they would later become a British a Dominion and fight in ww2 and WW1
@yaelvacacenteno13824 жыл бұрын
@@yugintaer2420 theynn be would have revolted lol
@yaelvacacenteno13824 жыл бұрын
@This is a name. not really. Actually people south of Manila severely opposed any attempts of invasion by Britain, so for Britain to actually invade the Philippines successfully, they would have had to elongate the war more time, which although would have allowed them to seize control of Philippines, would have given Spain time to attack the Thirteen Colonies, and Maybe help France retake New France. Plus, the Portuguese would have probably been defeated by then by France and Spain, and had Britain sent more of their vessels to attack the Philippines, France would have been able to invade mainland Britain through the south.
@peivlo78014 жыл бұрын
@@yugintaer2420 imagine if britain gave back gibraltar to spain
@cesarams21025 жыл бұрын
Another great video. Napoleonic Wars could come next because it had a huge impact on both Europe and Latin America, it would make a great one too
@Jsmith20242 жыл бұрын
This is the first of your videos that I've seen. I really like the format the level of information provided. It's a good overview. well portrayed. Thank you.
@realkekz5 жыл бұрын
Great content, as usual!
@riverlzy2 жыл бұрын
This actually sets a new perspective towards classical music for me - they are essentially Austrian/Holy Roman Empire music ; ) Wonder what the map of “Italy” is like when Barocco music peaks
@AGknowStick5 жыл бұрын
You guys are just amazing! You have made one of the most boring subjects as one of the most interesting one. Thanks Geo History
@Mark-xq7lh5 жыл бұрын
Yellow prussia reminds me of base vic2 Thats all I learned
@jacobhogan32085 жыл бұрын
I like a yellow Prussia, when I get the dlcs i may just change it to yellow with the files.
@Mark-xq7lh5 жыл бұрын
@@jacobhogan3208 you are a monster
@gravynavy5165 жыл бұрын
What about pink prussia
@Mark-xq7lh5 жыл бұрын
@@gravynavy516 pink is a better color then green for russia
@Kube_Dog5 жыл бұрын
how come the holy roman empire doesn't have rome in it
@TracyMelinda-lr2qq4 жыл бұрын
Great format with the map. Wish I would have had this at school 40+ years ago. Thanks learnt a lot quickly.😁
@abshirmasso35635 жыл бұрын
your voice so sweet isn’t boring 💪🙏👏
@LLT85 жыл бұрын
French: *Have a stronger army than Britain* Britain: Can’t use it until you cross the seas *has Royal Navy ships around the corner*
@vladescu3g4 жыл бұрын
@Master Yoda can you make some sense?
@oreroundpvp8964 жыл бұрын
The quality of the armies were close, but France had a much larger army simply because it is on the continent and had to maintain a large army to compete with other land powers such as Austria, Prussia and Russia. Britain however was at liberty to put a much larger amount of its military spending into the Royal Navy due to the fact of it being an Island nation which needs an extremely strong navy to survive. This meant though that france couldnt afford as large a Navy and therefore Britain had superiority at sea.
@vladescu3g4 жыл бұрын
@Master Yoda its clear yes that you have no clue of what are you talking about
@MemeMaster-gz7nk3 жыл бұрын
either way, britains army probably would have surpassed the french if they didn't spend the vast majority of their budget on ships
@Raisonnance.3 жыл бұрын
@@MemeMaster-gz7nk Absolutly not because Britain did not have the same population of France.
@josianezarka4053 жыл бұрын
The British victory in this war was resulted from several factors: the French monarchy heiress of Rome (in institutions) despised work. The French aristocrat attached little importance to : - the emerging industry (despite Colbert); - the colonial conquests that left to noble adventurers (Montcalm in Canada or Dupleix in India). Gradually in the 18th, the French aristocracy was declining (spend money on the pageantry, ruinous wars...) The British elites, less influenced by Rome (anglo-saxons and Norman influences) were closer places of production. They managed their lands directly. This encouraged industrial development. The separation between the aristocracy and a mercantile bourgeoisie was less marked. The same is true in Holland and Germany. These are countries that have suffered less from the historical influence of Rome (Rome was ruled by the Slave Patricians). France will finally embark on this path with the Revolution and the emergence of a new mercantile class. We know the rest... Otherwise, France would have a "Spanish destiny". The Spanish aristocracy was enriched only by the gold of South America. They didn't initiate an agrarian reform hallowing the industrial develoment.
@Gloriaimperial12 жыл бұрын
The British victory in this war had 6 essential factors 1) England was a stormy island in 1588, 1596 and 1597. That is why the three Spanish invasion fleets with more than 130 ships could not occupy London in 4 weeks, destroying all the possibility of creating a British empire 2) United Kingdom was an island in 1756-63. This is why France and Spain couldn't invade the UK in 4 weeks 3) The United Kingdom was an island in 1776-1783. That is why Spain could only make a naval blockade of England, capturing two British fleets of 24 and 55 ships. The objective was to invade England, but the French allies considered that amphibious invasions, although the United Kingdom was weakened by the war of the 13 colonies, were very complicated. 4) The United Kingdom was an island in 1805. That is why Napoleon's million soldiers who invaded Russia, Germany, Spain, Austria and Italy had to wait for a complicated connection with Villenenueve's fleet, which ended in the Battle of Trafalgar. 5) The United Kingdom was an island in 1870. That is why the Prussian army that destroyed the French army in a month could not finish the job in the same offensive, reaching London and destroying the British empire. 6) The United Kingdom was an island in 1940. That is why the Germans wandered through Paris and Amsterdam, and could not continue to London, capturing the entire British royal family.
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
@@Gloriaimperial1 you serious? Being an island doesn’t guarantee protection and I don’t know why you are crediting everything to that. The Royal Navy was the main factor, that’s it. The natural protection of the water means nothing without the main force to protect it, France has many favourable natural borders but this does not mean that all their victories are simply down to the natural terrain. I feel like you are trying to discredit the British military achievements and I’m not sure why, perhaps it’s jealousy which is really odd.
@Gloriaimperial12 жыл бұрын
@@maxdavis7722 Germany is a very effective country. The Germans are the largest national mass of people in Western Europe, with nearly 100 million highly far-sighted and willful inhabitants. They have always been the largest nationality in Europe. They are tenacious, calculating and efficient, many times, and also aggressive. But not even the efficient Germans have been able to prevent Berlin from being occupied several times by Napoleon and Russia, or Germany by Spain, destroying Germany and dividing it. France has had the same problems: various invasions of Paris (Spanish Empire, Germany, Prussia, Russia). The Netherlands has been invaded numerous times. If you look at Asia the same thing happens. China, India, Vietnam, Korea... All invaded. Curiously, there are two large countries, in Europe and Asia, that have never been invaded in the modern era, by the largest empires (Spanish, French, German or Mongolian), which had a ratio of troops of 5 against 1, or 7 against 1 Troops that could not be used. There are two islands: the United Kingdom and Japan. I believe that the Spanish invasion of Paris was carried out in three months, in 1590. The German invasion of Paris was carried out in 1 month in 1870, and 1 month in 1944. Blitzkrieg. To attempt to invade England in 1588, 1596, 1597, and 1718, Spain had to leave most of its infantry, artillery, and horses on the ground. We had to make a fleet for a year (4 times), wait for favorable winds. Hope that some British ships did not harass the fleet. And when everything was ready for the invasion in 1597 (with the British fleet outwitted) another storm appears (four storms). Sure, when we invaded Germany in 1588, it rained every day and there were storms, but the army didn't scatter within 30 km for weeks and had to go home, with broken sails and some sunken ships. They got into their tents, and the next day they arrived in Colonia and invaded it. On this island factor, the British were able to have an army of 40,000 infantrymen in the 18th century, when Spain and France had 200,000 and 400,000, dividing the budget. The British almost only had to invest in the fleet. If you also have the help of storms ... What makes you think that Churchill would have smoked a cigar, and made the bravado of him, if the Germans had a corridor of 1 km wide to reach England with the divisions panzer? All that material that almost reached Moscow, and three million soldiers, were rendered useless. If you have a border with Germany you are dead in 4 weeks. That the British could have done poorly, but with that advantage they were very effective? Yes. That England/UK, even if it had been invaded from land twice by a stronger empire, would also have developed a large army that would have entered Paris and Berlin or Madrid, at some point in history. Also. It's not normal for your economy and society to be intact for 500 years, while mainland Europe has all kinds of violent upheavals. It is normal if you are an island. Spain also had a lottery day, when it discovered America. That gave us gold and silver to dominate some countries in Europe for centuries. But we still had a land border for Napoleon.
@Rowlph8888 Жыл бұрын
@@maxdavis7722 Everything you said is true.I wouldn't bother engaging with these fabricators, it only leads to endless comments section as they don't accept anything logical
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
I love you're videos They're so helpful to contextualize things! One small correction though: you said that Fredrick defeated the French though outnumbered because he was "a fine strategist". Technically it was because he was good tactician (though he was also a good strategist). "Tactics" refers to your pre-battle plans and your changes of plans in-battle. Your overall plan over the course of an entire campaign is "strategy" (your plan for the entire war is "grand strategy"). So in this case, Fredrick's strategy was to defeat the French, then counter-march back to defeat the Austrians. He used tactics to defeat the French though outnumbered and then he used tactics again to defeat the Austrians.
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
Also what about South America? Or the two years of Anglo-French warfare in North America prior to the Seven Years (which continued over the course of the Seven Years, as you said) Overall, though, it's still a good overview. The Seven Year's War is pretty complicated for the uninitiated and this is helpful. Good job
@gwho Жыл бұрын
this channel picks the best music for such videos. tense, eerie hiphop beats.
@staxstirner5 жыл бұрын
GeoHistory has the best background instrumentals. I'm learning history while turning up.
@ahoraya1047 Жыл бұрын
Sane as in the Spanish colonies, Natives supported the Crown against independentist. Americans is the name adopted by the English colonists same way as Dutch colonists in South África adopted the name Afrikaners and the French colonists adopted the name of Canadians
@saintjust59255 жыл бұрын
"Great Britain" included the Kingdom of Ireland at this time - as the king of England was also the King of Ireland
@chriscryer70875 жыл бұрын
Saint Just no the Kingdom of Ireland was a separate state under a personal union (two countries that have the same head of state without merging) Ireland would become a part of the UK in 1801
@chrisdaniels39295 жыл бұрын
Also Ireland is not a kingdom. Wales is a principality. Scotland and England are kingdoms, which have the same monarch since the Scottish king inherited the English crown in 1603. His mother was Elizabeth's aunt, I think.
@chriscryer70875 жыл бұрын
@@chrisdaniels3929 No its not a Kingdom now but the Kingdom of Ireland existed from 1542 when Henry VIII proclaimed himself King of Ireland until 1801 when Ireland became part of the UK.
@faithlesshound56215 жыл бұрын
During this period, the Elector of Hanover was King of Great Britain and Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg: he did not become King of Hanover until 1814, after the end of the Holy Roman Empire and the recovery of Hanover from the Napoleonic province of Westphalia. The Kings of England and later Great Britain also pretended to be Kings of France. Rulers subject to the Holy Roman Emperor could not be kings of territories within it (except for Bohemia), but they could be kings of countries outside the HRE: such as Britain, Spain, Sweden, Poland and Prussia. Patriotic English historians tend to play down the influence of foreign powers on their country: Denmark, France, the Papacy, Scotland, Holland, the HRE and now the USA.
@Jacksiloution4 жыл бұрын
Well if your a country ball mapper just let ireland be British as we don't do anything in it
@Goldwingaction5 жыл бұрын
I love history, always been my favorite subject. And so I found this video to be really informative and entertaining! Great work! You just earned a new subscriber!
@jamesthetruthful76735 жыл бұрын
Most underrated channel on the Tube
@deaddeaddeaddeaddead56673 жыл бұрын
The visuals on this help so much and help to keep it simple. Thank you!!!
@masterdan24865 жыл бұрын
Wow. This video was amazing. I’m Canadian and I live in Laval/Montreal and this is pretty accurate with what I learned at school. You’re really amazing. Plz do the American revolution next if possible. Good luck🎉🎊🎉👍👍❤️❤️
@eurosensazion5 жыл бұрын
Shocking they still teach real history in class in Canada lol. It's cause your Quebec. I dunno what they teach anymore in Ontario to the kids. We learned this stuff in lates 90's early 2000's.
@nickturko22245 жыл бұрын
This war is well known in Quebec, possibly more then anywhere else for ethnonationalist reasons, that the french ceded their north american territory to the british
@borivojetravica5695 жыл бұрын
Did you teach in school... Way ALL country after war.... "In heavy Debt" to WHO??????? Tax money go to who???.... If you know, tnx
@masterdan24865 жыл бұрын
eurosensazion I Learned this in 5th grade (In Quebec school) and it was important that we learn how New france lost to the British. We particularly learned the siege of Quebec and the capture of Montreal. We didn’t learn much about European battles though.
@Jeremy-nt3rb5 жыл бұрын
@@eurosensazion I teach at an international school with Ontario curriculum and the Seven Years War is covered in grade seven.
@JoJoXYouTube5 жыл бұрын
1756 - WW1 1790 - WW2 1914 - WW3 1939 - WW4 Is it all true..???
@paulus1212125 жыл бұрын
Well to be fair the naoplonic war was ww2 French empire v Europe and v British empire and sine British empire had a big chuck of the world and France also not to shabby tht was also ww2
@IncrediibleHauck5 жыл бұрын
J0J0X 1812? You’re dumb
@augth5 жыл бұрын
*1790-1815 - WW2
@jenniferstover13505 жыл бұрын
2019-???? 5th world war
@FaithfulOfBrigantia5 жыл бұрын
I'd argue 1618 is WW1. Yes, it was mostly fought in Europe, but the Iberian Union did already stretch all the way from Canada to Japan, and the Dutch did fight the Portuguese in America, Africa and Asia. With the exception of Oceania, it was indeed fought all over the world.
@Zerohhhd5 жыл бұрын
2:03 Austria looks like how their king looked like
@titanusrodan28905 жыл бұрын
lol
@daltonmiller55905 жыл бұрын
It's like the history/mapping community here on KZbin actually get together and decide on what topic or war they're doing next. I swear I just watched The Armchair Historian's newest video on the Seven Years War a few days ago.
@mcbain235 жыл бұрын
Another top vid! Thank you GH and Rahul :)
@MysteriousCreator3 жыл бұрын
"Oh sorry, was I not meant to split his head open with a tomahawk?" "Ah don't worry, it's not like this will start a 7 year major global conflict" And what happened next was a 7 year major global conflict
@realOGT922 жыл бұрын
Tu n'es pas encore mort, mon père.
@pointlesscine5 жыл бұрын
0:27 Nitpicky correction: The HRE is ruled over by imperial princes. Not all of them were prince electors (there were only 7-10 of those).
@samsngdevice51035 жыл бұрын
I like this channel. Great minds exist here.
@elitheprophet12064 жыл бұрын
Great video, please make more and i will continue to support. Well done!
@miyamotomusashi45564 жыл бұрын
Wow, this video made realize how fascinating history can be, at the same time, it showed me how little I know about it.
@vezrimmm5 жыл бұрын
Next do the Napoleonic Wars. Love the video btw.
@bobozeehax5 жыл бұрын
splendid video! though its not called "the first world war", its in fact called "world war zero"
@OrangeUtan14 жыл бұрын
This was basically when Germany was a kid and France and Britain were more worried about each other than their future nemisis
@sparrow694205 жыл бұрын
This is pretty knowledge full AND I LOVE TO COLLECT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT WARS AND WORLD.
@borivojetravica5695 жыл бұрын
Can your collect knowledge tell me... ALL country after war.... "In heavy Debt" to WHO??????? Tax money go to who???
@sparrow694205 жыл бұрын
@@borivojetravica569 not in Europe but in Every part of world
@studiojace Жыл бұрын
Bro how in the world is this channel not at 10 million subs!?
@Daniel.Liddicoat5 жыл бұрын
Britain's strategy seems to boil down to: make war with me and I take your colonies to add to my cool collection.
@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
Don't fight against the empire that the sun never sets on.
@archivesoffantasy55604 жыл бұрын
Our war strategy against Napoleon Rule the waves but Pay Austria Prussia and Russia to do the bulk of the fighting, see them all get wrecked Send wellington to Spain Wait for Napoleon to make a big mistake Win at Waterloo
@cs03454 жыл бұрын
It's impossible to attack a country directly with all their allies
@peivlo78014 жыл бұрын
@@kyle18934 which one
@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
@@peivlo7801 the one this comment thread is talking about
@Fourbix5 жыл бұрын
2:25 do we have the same definition of surrounding? Because it really looks like the situation is inverted.
@wennextheproffesionial12 жыл бұрын
Down in OHIO
@mohdadeeb18295 жыл бұрын
History of Colonization. Whole World.
@ITzzBota5 жыл бұрын
Oh 😂😂😂🖐
@jomo35645 жыл бұрын
Colonisation of Pakistan and India by Arabs?
@ITzzBota5 жыл бұрын
@@jomo3564 which Arabs
@itsoutlaw_5 жыл бұрын
And the first humans ever colonized the world
@mohdadeeb18295 жыл бұрын
Every Country.
@Chaseleep Жыл бұрын
Subbed from Lebanon 🇱🇧
@jonathanrobinson4073 жыл бұрын
Your pronunciation of French cities is pretty good, thanks and congrats
@rotarydude97375 жыл бұрын
"Prussian Defeat" >When they are literally surrounded by the three great powers of Europe and still fend off for several years.
@qwertzuiopu81615 жыл бұрын
Prussia had never been defeated in this war, because it had never been occupied and had always an army.
@Hdusiekwbshsjs5 жыл бұрын
Yes they lost which means it’s a defeat
@qwertzuiopu81615 жыл бұрын
@@dillonblair6491 in a war you aren't defeated as long as you are independent and taking part actively in the war. So there's no matter if you're losing a campaign or not.
@FaithfulOfBrigantia5 жыл бұрын
@@qwertzuiopu8161 If you lose a battle, you were defeated in that battle.. You don't have to be unconditionally defeated and annexed to loose.
@pengstirbkuchen59875 жыл бұрын
@@FaithfulOfBrigantia In early WW2, Britain lost many battles against Germany. Were they defeated? I don't think so.
@user-nh7my6gg5b5 жыл бұрын
Wow, what a complex war! It's because of this war that we have the American Revolution. The domino effect of this revolution led to other revolutions, most notably the French Revolution, Haiti, and throughout the Spanish Empire. The French Revolution caused the Napoleonic Wars, which led to the Congress of Vienna to balance the powers in Europe. After some scuttles like the Crimean War and Franco-Prussian War as well as a scramble for colonies, it created alliances which eventually led to WW1! Unresolved tension after that war led to WW2 which made the United States and Soviet Union the two main superpowers in the world, battling through a bunch of several proxy wars across the world as a battle between capitalism and communism called the Cold War, changing the geopolitical landscape. In the last part of the Cold War, the Soviet-Afghan War, the United States helped the mujahideen against the Soviets, one of which was Osama bin Laden, founder of Al Qaeda. Supposedly, Al Qaeda perpetrated 9/11 leading to the War on Terror in which the U.S commits war crimes throughout the world to force their 'universal human values', but really for oil...and this leads to another Cold War between the US, EU, Saudi Arabia and allies and Iran, Russia, China and allies through another series of proxy wars such as Syria and Yemen...and here we are today. All because someone didn't want a woman to become emperor xD
@jeffbenton61835 жыл бұрын
A never-ending series of World Wars...
@santiagoflores49135 жыл бұрын
I bow to your comprehensive knowledge, sir! By your comment I rest reassured not all is lost with the human race for at least someone is seeing the big picture...
@DrewPicklesTheDark5 жыл бұрын
I think it's not considered WW1 since even though it takes place over multiple continents, it's still European powers fighting. WW1 was the first intercontinental war where alliances that spanned the world formed (Such as the Ottomans joining Germany, or Japanese joining the UK).
@nerdyguy1152 Жыл бұрын
Sun King’s War, which is dated earlier than Seven Years War, also fought on several continents
@westlethegreat63884 жыл бұрын
That's such an amazing explanation
@friedrichdergroe5934 жыл бұрын
lol
@mrdinoking66264 жыл бұрын
I love how you explain wars
@adosado645 жыл бұрын
Fought a Seven Years' War, I ain't scared of a Tsar *_cause beating you only took me twelve bars_*
@thomasdelgado55505 жыл бұрын
"Take a seat"
@HeadsetHatGuy4 жыл бұрын
8:07 Damn, he pronounced Manila correctly
@martinmacht33305 жыл бұрын
Sweden???
@72oguz5 жыл бұрын
The simplest narration, well done 👍
@NT-fo3me3 жыл бұрын
In the US, this was taught as the French & Indian War, at least when I was in school during the 60s/70s. That it was actually part of a wider conflict was mentioned in passing.
@FaithfulOfBrigantia5 жыл бұрын
7:55 Did you just cover the Fantastic War (Where an army of 8000 Portuguese and 7000 Britons successfully defeated an invasion of 20 000 Spaniards and 15 000 French, inflicting a whoping 30 000 casualties in the Franco-Spanish army while losing fewer than 1000 men, by using cleaver Scorched Earth tactics, raids and ambushes and completely cutting off the Franco-Spanish army from their supply lines, causing it to collapse under its own weight) in 5 seconds? Also, did you just completely overlook the Brazilian and Uruguayan theatres?
@tibodeclercq21315 жыл бұрын
Geo-History Test : If you give the right answers you will find a nice statement : 1) The 3rd letter of the empire that ruled most of Mexico before the spanish forces arrived. 2) The last letter of the region India and Pakistan have been fighting for. 3) The 4th letter of a former Russian territory on the American continent. 4) Second letter of the country Saudi-Arabia accuses to support rebels in Yemen. 5) The first letter of the today American state that was once a Mexican territory and it's own nation. 6) 4th letter of a country that was once part of Pakistan. 7) First letter of the nation that, along with Chile, conquered the last tribes in south America. 8) The 4th letter of the country Israel gave the Sinai peninsula to after occupation. 9) The 4th letter of a man born in Italy but worked for the spanish crown. 10) Second letter of a today big city that was initially a Dutch settlement. 11) The second letter of the country in Asia where the USA retreated from during the cold war. 12) The 5th letter of the middle eastern ally of Germany during World War 1. Now order the letters : [5][2][9][12][8] [11][3] [6][4][10][7][1]
@jannishorst-dieterdrager34635 жыл бұрын
Nah he isnt bruh
@kaiserwilhelmii22515 жыл бұрын
Trimp is great?
@pethaino32155 жыл бұрын
Easy enough. 1. T 2. R 3. S 4. R 5. T 6. G 7. A 8. P 9. U 10. E 11. I 12. M "Trump is great" Are you sure about that?
@tibodeclercq21315 жыл бұрын
@@pethaino3215 Brilliant ! clever person
@tibodeclercq21315 жыл бұрын
@@kaiserwilhelmii2251 Brilliant ! Clever person
@ITzzBota5 жыл бұрын
3:30 British didn't attack like that. They bribed the Bengali and French forces and took over by false means.
@awesome54105 жыл бұрын
Northeast India in details all is fair in love and war
@ITzzBota5 жыл бұрын
@Bumblen Gaming Assam
@ITzzBota5 жыл бұрын
@@awesome5410 😂😂😂 war it didn't even happened. The shoulders just surrendered after getting the money
@revanwarlord64315 жыл бұрын
@@ITzzBota War already happened by that time. Some war don't even require guns/swords to fight
@ByzantineCapitalManagement5 жыл бұрын
First time an Indian like you making these videos. I am Impressed.
@neillennon56942 жыл бұрын
Nice summary of a very complicated war - very useful. The only point I would contend - at the end you said Britain imposed taxes on the Americans to pay for the war in Europe. My understanding was that because the American colonists kept ignoring the agreed treaty with the Indians Britain was forced to station troops in America. The (not unreasonable) taxes imposed were to pay for these troops to protect the American colonists.
@user-wn3zd4ll1y5 жыл бұрын
Can you please make a summary of A Hundred Years' War?
@mumtissibra57855 жыл бұрын
All our life consists of wars oh my god
@saladbruh26255 жыл бұрын
7:55 , spain goes to war with France, but attacks portugal , British ally? A mistake in script for sure
@ManOWar2Red5 жыл бұрын
What he mean by saying this is that Spain joined France side in the war.
Then see battle of Cartagena de indias, where 3.000 Spanish won vs 30.000 British
@hamhobo1234124 жыл бұрын
Except near as I can tell this battle didn't happen. Atleast I can't find sources that even come close to this. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raid_on_St_Malo en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Saint_Cast (wikipedia I know) Maybe I'm wrong but on first glance I can't find evidence to support otherwise.
@ppb40374 жыл бұрын
@@hamhobo123412 maybe because black legend. They never will recognise that
@sussyballs4243 жыл бұрын
But fails to defeat Prussia lmao
@ericrathbun1779 Жыл бұрын
This was excellent!! Thank you.
@historycenter40115 жыл бұрын
This is really good. Love it
@East_13053 жыл бұрын
France and Britain are like those 2 Hero and Anti-Hero in Anime. They fought each other alot until one day a common enemy show up and they are forced to work together to beat the shit out of it
@ryandebruin92215 жыл бұрын
Are you french or Austrian? You pronounced names quite well in the video
@moxiangtongxiu47875 жыл бұрын
He's Indian
@moxiangtongxiu47875 жыл бұрын
@Max . Look at the description below. The English translation and voiceover is done by Rahul Venkit.
@moxiangtongxiu47875 жыл бұрын
@Max . Yes truly . He is an Indian journalist based in Brussels working for a Chinese company, so that might explain the French connection 😄. Ps. Where are you from?
@虎鯊影業 Жыл бұрын
What is pronounced?
@ЗабивнойАбобус-т1ю Жыл бұрын
2:30 Only in Ohio 💀💀💀
@aar0n.mp3648 ай бұрын
That intro had no business being that hard
@schwenke0695 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all of the info. New to me. I'll probably have to watch that in slow motion at least 10 times to get a grasp.
@xxMADxxSCIENTISTxx5 жыл бұрын
That's a very fine presentation! :) However, I wonder why you didn't cover the minor Swedish invasion on Prussian Pomerania. Do you consider it only as a local event with little to none consequences on the grand scheme of things?
@MissionMiauw5 жыл бұрын
Maybe you can do the 80 years war of indenpendence of the netherlands?
@quagmire775 жыл бұрын
We Europeans love a war dont we? 🇬🇧😜
@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
Stop dragging us into wars Lol we do like starting our own wars though 🇺🇸
@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
@Daniel Marranghelli well, I mean...I did. There is an island on the east coast where its named after my grandfathers last name, and he can trace his roots back to a farm on the island.
@Yui_1875 жыл бұрын
Damn I really love how the music fits really well
@codyslevin35135 жыл бұрын
This was great man! Thanks for making it
@AlimTetramorph5 жыл бұрын
"Little known war" Huge in US history. Something that we all learn about here (at least its effects on the colonies).
@AlimTetramorph5 жыл бұрын
@Zion thirtydecember2006 No, I studied about the war itself. Though there was a definite focus on the battles that occurred in North America.
@seconds-js7pf4 жыл бұрын
Thats because the US doesnt have a long history
@kilroy25173 жыл бұрын
We may be different generations ,but when I was in school, the French-Indian War got a brief mention as a prelude to the Revolution.
@jvstAsYouAre5 жыл бұрын
3:27 " *Deep throats the prince...* "
@comradeeickelmann64145 жыл бұрын
The first world war World war 1: am i a joke to you
@hugorefachinho4 жыл бұрын
Great Graphics, and explanation. Thank you. Only missing the portuguese cities in India and China.
@brycecouture55784 жыл бұрын
Gosh, this war would be impossible to understand without this illustration.