SharpEye "Inferno 72" Dark Arts Surfboard Review Ep 116

[@spencermcallon22]

I’ve watched loads of your reviews. That’s the best surfing I’ve seen you do. As mentioned no down time between turns, loads of fluidity and great response and control. I watched the stab review, a guy named Kale Brock review it, both ripping on it as well. Going to get one!!!

[@familyjay5636]

This board looked PARTICULARLY beautiful on your backhand. So smooth, powerful, and just darn pretty.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Cheers for the kind words

[@gglendormi]

Agree lot better on the backhand

[@joeblow2183]

I’ve listened to Noel’s reviews multiple times. He answers almost every question that might come up

[@skippywinters]

Love how after all this time Noel doesn’t care if there’s a power socket sitting on his head. Perfect amount of tech talk + actual footage of what a board can do. No BS just plain ripping. Good stuff Noel 👍

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Cheers

[@shanemcenroe5427]

I just picked up this board in the DarkArts model. Brought it back to Oahu for winter 23/24. I’m hoping it’s gold.

[@adamwaz5615]

Sharp eye is killing lately!! Nice review Noel 🤙

[@ThePokersurfer]

Finally the right height that fits you right. Never understood the dark decked board concept

[@JoeTchify]

I've had the Inferno 72 for a few months now and I can honestly say it feels almost similar to the Disco, except faster and snappier. The similarities are the paddling power and control, but I have to say I still love the Pyzel and Firewire more, just because it's easier to paddle and more control on the speed. Maybe it's the North OC beach breaks, but I just think it's because I have a big upper body and need the extra foam near the nose, lol.

[@hansimmerguet9892]

Wich Pyzel do you have and how do they compare?

[@JoeTchify]

@@hansimmerguet9892 I had the Pyzel Phantom, and I can say that the Sharpeye Inferno is much faster, but the Pyzel is more paddle friendly and more control going down the line.

[@hansimmerguet9892]

@@JoeTchify Allright, thanks for the answer ; )

[@sumatran]

I thought you looked significantly better in the PU. Not just control, but, to me, your turns looked stronger and springier.

[@colemandupont7502]

Agree

[@BananaBabys]

almost everyone surfs better on a PU. The flex is predictable. Its easy to pop an epoxy into the air but hard to land because of the springiness. I almost think you need to ride an epoxy extra small and fine railed to get it to flex underfoot properly.

[@BananaBabys]

almost everyone surfs better on a PU. The flex is predictable. Its easy to pop an epoxy into the air but hard to land because of the springiness. I almost think you need to ride an epoxy extra small and fine railed to get it to flex underfoot properly.

[@giladshayan4647]

Hi Noel, great review, love your show... can you please help me and compare this inferno 72 to the OG flyer and sub driver 2.0? Thanks!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I72 offers more performance compared to OG and a bit more flare in turns. They both paddle good... the OG might be a little more user friendly. The Sub Driver 2.0 that I had seems a bit long for me in the stock dims so I ordered a new one. No comment on that model yet.... sorry

[@bastiencht1931]

Hi Noel, love your reviews! I'm trying to choose between the Storm and the inferno 72 as a daily driver in french waves (2-6ft). What are the main differences between the 2 for you? Thanks!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The I72 has more speed and flow rail to rail. The Storms seems to have a little more of a HPSB feel to it. Making it a little more demanding... The I72 seems more forgiving and a little easier to surf.

[@pablo.capeto]

Another killer review Noel! I know they're in different categories, but how would you compare this board VS the CI's Fever ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The I72 is faster in 2-4' surf and it fits in a tighter pocket better due to it being shorter. I also like the I72 better as a Daily Driver.... I don't have to work as hard for down the line speed. The Fever is a legit HPSB.... on of my all time Favorites and when the waves are pumping 5-8' Surf that would be my first choice.

[@jedalloyd]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Hi Noel. How would you compare the I72 vs the Driver 2.0? I know the Driver 2.0 is a HPSB, however I've heard it goes well in 2-4' surf. Which one would you pick as a daily driver?

[@simo7270]

Yep! Id also like to hear ya answer on this one Noel!! Driver 2.0 vs I72 !?

[@bellpaleale]

Rented one of these from Claremont Surfshop and everything you said about this board is true… and I even rode it 2L under what I normally ride. If I get one of these Dark Arts, it’s definitely getting a mat like Surfco’s wax mat because this thing melted wax like crazy and in a short time exposed to the sun.

[@rlee350]

Amazing review like always Noel. I've watched the SITD and Kale's review on the Inferno 72 but was waiting on your inputs, as I feel your review is the gold standard. There also isn't much info available on the Dark Arts characteristics and feel, thank you for providing those. Have you considered doing a favorite of your favorites? Example: Pyzalien 2 vs Inferno 2 vs Dominator 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Yes.. we have considered that.. maybe in the near future

[@taradead]

Local guy has a dark arts board and it weighs absolutely nothing...never felt a board that light. He's not a great surfer, but not the worst and when he surfs it, he looks out of control...like it's just flying all over the place. BTW, good music choice...nice not to be distracted by vocals.

[@fgazel86]

Cheers from Costa Rica Noel. In FCS which fin model would you recommend for this board between Reactors or Carvers?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Carvers

[@luygurgeldoamaral6167]

Hello Noel! Another great review on what seems to be an amazing surfboard! Thanks for that!👏 Here is my question, how would you compare the I72 to the medina model, both the P.U construction? Overall which one do you like the most?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Two great boards.... the Medina might be a bit faster down the line and smoother rail to rail but the I72 is more radical in the pocket and faster rail to rail.

[@radiokaput]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Hi Noel, it's been long since this review and I'm not sure if I will get an answer but betwen the two boards Luy mentioned, could you say any of them make it easy to catch the wave? Where I usually surf is getting more crowded day by day... in all this competition I feel I need a board that goes into the wave as soon as possible so I cant stand up a split second faster. Thanks a lot!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@radiokaput The Medina has less entry rocker… so it paddles better compared to I72.

[@saltybarber149]

This is looking like the best board I've seen under your feet!

[@Dany-rf7up]

Hi Noel great review as always! Just a quick one does it have enough nose rocker for a front footed surfer. I’ve learnt that I surf more off my front foot and that my board I ride currently is too flat in the nose and waves that I should make the drop in or ride end up catching on the nose rail. Keep up the best reviews on KZbin mate! Cheers 🇦🇺

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Yes, the I72 has good entry rocker and it wont bog in the nose area like flatter entry rocker boards do for you.

[@Dany-rf7up]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Great thanks Noel!!

[@neoschulman2741]

Hi I was wondering if you could do a review on the 77

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

No sorry… too much rocker for the waves here in So Cal where I like. That board needs a steeper more powerful wave to go good.

[@Ronny439]

Hey noel, I have the air 17x, wondering if there is any similarities between them and which u preferred? U were ripping on both models.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Air 17x is a great board but it did not make my Favorites list. The I72 is faster rail to rail and it carries more down the line speed with a bit more flare in the pocket.

[@GustavoZilles]

I still curious for the DHD Phoenix review!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I’m still waiting for my boards that I ordered last Nov/Dec.

[@Fournierthe4th]

Noel can you compare two of the most hyped small wave performance boards of 2021. The disco inferno and the Sub-driver

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I prefer the I72 I’ve the SD 2.0. The I72 seems to be faster and easier to surf. The SD 2.0 suits a front footed surfer better as it likes to driven from the front foot. The I72 seems to be more neutral… so it works good for both front footed and back footed surfers.

[@alexlerner7964]

Yes i've been waiting for this! Now the question i got is what do you like better. Fever or inferno 72. 🤙🏾

[@messono]

fever is a sick board but I'm getting the I72 next time

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The I72 is faster in 2-4' surf and it fits in a tighter pocket better due to it being shorter. I also like the I72 better as a Daily Driver.... I don't have to work as hard for down the line speed. The Fever is a legit HPSB.... on of my all time Favorites and when the waves are pumping 5-8' Surf that would be my first choice.

[@alexlerner7964]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks so much. I just got the fever for my birthday today!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@alexlerner7964 Yewww!! Happy Bday

[@karljakobsson2687]

another comparison request! please compare i72 with pyzel shadow? what would the difference look like in 3-4ft surf.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Shadow has more rocker compared to the I72... so the Shadow will offer more traction/hold on rail but it will slower in smaller waves. The Shadow is a legit HPSB and a better comparison would be the SharpEye 77. Both of these boards will work best in waves with some power or hollow waves. The I72 is more of a Daily Driver or Small Wave performance board... best in average to less than average waves.

[@karljakobsson2687]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks legend!

[@NMathew91]

Great review! How would you recommend it for the lower intermediate surfer who's a bit heavier in stature? Worried it might be a bit too high performance.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

It might be a little to high performance

[@amydale2315]

Hey Noel. Sick review. I am trying to decide between the mini ghost or the Inferno 72. Both look super fun, but the Inferno keeps sticking out. My hang up is that I surf in really cold water so need some extra volume, therefore usually between 31 and 32 liters. That pushes me into a 6'0 Inferno or a 5'10 mini ghost. I'm 5'11 and don't love surfing boards longer than me. Should that push me into the MG or get that hangup out of my head? Plan on using from thigh high to overhead.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say MG without a doubt!!

[@robthomson4720]

Hey Noel, love your channel! I bought the P2 after your review great board, surfed in 2ft to over double overhead, but I find it a little narrow for me sometimes and lacking a bit of squirt. Looking for a quicker squash tail that's a bit wider and more stable, do you think this would fit the bill? My other boards are a Glazer, DHD black diamond. I think you would love the Glazer. Cheers 🤙🤙

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Pretty similar to P2… maybe a little more responsive but not sure you will get more squirt. Did you try different fins on the P2 for my Squirt?

[@robthomson4720]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Hey Noel, thanks for the reply. yes I've used AM2 techflex, jordys, Pyzel set. The Pyzels thrusters are pretty good and I put the Quad set in for heavy, hollow days. I use those same fins in another board and get a lot of squirt, so I was thinking its more in the board design? If they are too similar, what would you recommend in a Squash tail? I'm 6'2, 178 pounds, intermediate. Liter range 30-34 and normally like an all rounder between 6-6'3 long. I've been eyeing up a Rusty Keg as well, might be worth a review :)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@robthomson4720 The wider tail boards that have good speed for me are the Rocket Wide Squash Tail and Mini Ghost Squash

[@KMFFILMZ]

Hi any chance you will will be doing a review on a synergy

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Not at this time. That board needs a good wave… Not ideal for our waves or our community. I really don’t have much desire to ride those rockered out HPSB’s these days.

[@tonymiller1312]

Hi, great review as ever! A quick question if you have a moment… I am 183cm / 6ft and looking to get the Inferno 72 in their E3 epoxy construction, either 5’10 or 5’9 length… I can make either work to give the volume I want. Normally I use a 5’10 for my HPSB but wondered if there might be a benefit in going 5’9 for the Inferno 72, to fit in the pocket of smaller waves a bit better than a 5’10? I know it’s a trade off between rail length/hold of the 5’10 working better in bigger waves and the 5’9 maybe fitting better in smaller waves/for manoeuvrability. Just which way to go :-) Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say 5’9” for quicker pivot in smaller wave pockets. If your focus for this board is small wave ripping then the 5’9” will suit you better

[@tonymiller1312]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks for your input 🙂 What would you say the most suited wave range would be for the 5'9? and what wave range for the 5'10? I am looking to use the I72 in 1-6ft

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@tonymiller1312 Both sizes are best in 3-6’ surf. The 5’9” will excel in 3-4’m surf over the 5’10”.

[@jamieryan8328]

Great review Noel as always. I've waiting for you to review this one. Looks like a ton of fun.

[@Migpires]

Hi Noel, I have a I72 test drive board in dark arts 5.10 19 and 2.50 28L, to test it and then decide between PU or DA construction. Can you tell me what futures fin set is the most similar to the ones you used during the review. The board has white painted rails on top of the glassing, did your DA have the same painted rails? Does sharpeye does this way? Cheers!! Miguel

[@eranherzog3467]

Hi Noel, which board will be better in small choppy 2-3 feet? Storms or Inferno 72? what are the main diff between both of them?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say Storms…. It will carry more speed

[@jorget4785]

Great review. Both boards looked to have good flow and hold.. When will you do the Rusty Miso!!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The MIso was just picked up last week. There are a few other board models in front of it so it might be a bit. Hang tight....

[@MyMotherWasaNinja]

Why are standard dims for this model so thick? I got one and it works great as a groveller (wave pool size) because it has so much lift, but as soon as it gets overhead it is really hard to sink the rail.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I can see how that would happen. Is yours stock dimensions or custom?

[@MyMotherWasaNinja]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Mine is custom ordered but I was so thrown off by the sizing, I jusf went with stock dims. Sharpeye said not to be thrown off by the thickness because the board is so foiled, so a 2 1/2" would feel like a 2 3/8".

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@MyMotherWasaNinja Bummer

[@danidani5426]

Hi Noel . I have a neckbeard2, CI Happy for better days at home and a local shape step up for 8 plus. Im torn between this Inferno o flatearth to sit above neckbeard2 o when repair this o happy when surfing. Any advice?. BEST regards and great Channel

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

There is some wave overlap on the NB2 and I72. The NB2 is faster and pivots a little quicker. I say go FE with my Pivot Twin + Trailer…. It’s so fun and very high performance lines. You can also shred the FE as a Pure Twin with my HP Twins in shoulder high surf and have fun. For me the I72 is epic and I would have it as my daily or HPSB for So Cal Waves.

[@joseande9627]

Hey Noel, how did the inferno 72 compare to the HT2.0 from Sharepeye? What’s your thoughts on a single concave board like the HT2 compared to a board that has a single to double concave? Anything stand out?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The HT2 seems to have more rocker. It’s a legit HPSB so it takes a bit more rail surfing to get it going. I also think the HT2 is more demanding…. You gotta be on your game. The I72 is more forgiving, it Carrie’s has more glide and speed down the line with less effort. The I72 is more of a Daily Driver or Small Wave performance board.

[@joseande9627]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Ah yip, so the HT2 could have a better wave range say 3-7ft than the i72? Do you notice anything different about boards that just have a single concave instead of a single to double?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@joseande9627 Hard to say if I could tell the difference in bottom contours with the rockers being different. The HT2 does have a better wave range 3-7’ surf and the I72 is 2-6’ surf. I highly recommend the I72 for intermediate surfers. If I had to choose one… I say I72

[@avishayavisar3703]

Hi Noel, Amazing review keep doing your great job. I got a question about this board. I saw a lot of surfing clips with this board but it always looks like this board going to the bottom of the wave. Is it right? Because I am considering between the HT2 and the inferno 72 and I'm afraid that this board won't be good in beach brakes and closeouts.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The HT2 might be a little more high performance and sharper off the bottom in hollow Beachies. The I72 seems a little faster down the line and easier to surf.

[@emiliogerbelli]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 very helpful, had the same doubt!

[@catinthehat8412]

wish I could get some of your fins I live in Australia the cost because of exchange rate that concave would suit tajs surfing to a tea

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Shipping is $40.00.... talk to the folks at Surfboard Empire and request that they start carrying them over there in OZ.

[@catinthehat8412]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I will talk to surfboard empire

[@estanisllacerrodriguez3244]

Hello I currently have a Rocket Wide Squash Tail 5'7. I'm looking for a second board for winter waves or stronger wing day. My question is whether Phantom, Pyzalien 2 and Inferno 72 would be good options?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

P2 has the best wave range at 3-10’ surf. The Phantom carves best out of the 3 and it’s the easiest board to shred. The I72 offers the most progressing in 2-6’ surf... more radical rail to rail out of the 3 boards.

[@estanisllacerrodriguez3244]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 ok 👌🏻

[@Ronny439]

What would you prefer the flat earth or I72 for everyday waves/conditions 2-4foot. Thanks.

[@cheesmonster]

Thank you for doing a review of a Dark Arts constructed board!

[@izandevainmyheart1129]

Man dude! As you get older it seems like your surfing better and better....as opposed to entropy. Wish I had your genes. Those backhand turns where you say you go too far look as good as anyone on WSL I'm seriously considering this board because of those particular turns. Great review brother 👍

[@jorgebicho2216]

Hey noel love your reviews, I'm stuck between the 72 or the 77 what do you recommend, I've been surfing whit the js xero, thanks

[@KMFFILMZ]

Hey Noel how does this board compare to driver 2.0?

[@facundosaid5490]

Hi noel, I bought an inferno 72 in the standard pu construction instead of the light team construction. It's a good board but it feels stiff. When I'm in full speed, it's really difficult to control it. I'm wondering if your pu board it's in the light team and if you think it would make a considerable difference? Cheers, I love your channel and surfing!!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

My board was team light PU/Poly. What fins are you using in yours?

[@facundosaid5490]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I started using the AM1 honeycomb (futures) and then changed to Hayden Shapes HS2 for more pivot. It improved a little bit but I just don't feel in control at all at full speed with neither set of fins. It reminds me of firewire timbertek construction I used to have. It was so stiff that it was hard to turn at high speed. I also have a CI Fever in ultra light and a Pyzel Ghost in the same volume and both boards feel amazing at full speed. This is why I think the standard construction in Inferno 72 what is causing the problem.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@facundosaid5490 Team Light glassing will offer a bit more feel and flex. It’s also easier to put the board where you want in the lip quicker due to the board being lighter. However the board being heavier at high speeds should give you a bit more control not less. Unless your are struggling with the board being stiff in flexing.

[@GeniusUnleashed]

That epoxy looked amazing under your feet. I've never seen you drive off the bottom so quickly. Might be my next board.

[@macawakabamboo]

Hey Noel, I have a quick questions. How does the dark arts hold compared to Epoxy or PU? I generally ride Epoxies a lot however I find when I have a lot of speed or the wave is on the larger side I have a hard time holding through my bottom turns and I don’t usually have that problem with my PU boards. So where does the dark arts construction land between the two?

[@ricardocanuto1377]

INFERNO 72 X STORMS LOOKS THE SAME READING READING THE ASPECTS .BOTH CAME FROM DISCO INFERNO.SO WHATS THE DIFERENCE ?????? YOU ARE THE BEST GUY ON REVIEW !!!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Storms surfs a little more like a HPSB… tighter turns in the pocket but you gotta work a little harder rail to rail to generate speed. The I72 carries more speed, glide, and that makes it easier to shred.

[@konamedina3336]

With the extra explosiveness with the dark arts do you think it would be better for airs

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Absolutely

[@chadsugden411]

I find even going from PU to epoxy boards my timings off and I get to the lip faster then I’m used to.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Absolutely... the Dark Arts rebounds faster and harder compared to a normal EPS/Epoxy board.

[@chadsugden411]

Surf n Show Reviews yeah, my time would be way way off then haha 😂

[@diegonunez6706]

hi Noel, excellent video, what surfboard do you think is better as a daily driver for intermediate level and keep progressing, an inferno 72 or Pyzel Phamton? thanks for your videos. Saludos desde Chile.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Phantom is easier to surf... it paddles better, it’s faster down the line with more glide, and it carves better. The I72 is sharper in the pocket, gets vertical quicker, and more radical for progressive surfing.

[@jmatthews1257]

Hey Noel, love my sharpeye in DA construction. First one I got was in PU with FCS 2 loved it so much went custom to fine tune and in Dark Arts BUT it came with future boxes… other than your fin what would you recommend rake template?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Jordy’s new set or AM’s

[@sdigsy4414]

Awesome review Does this board need to be on its rail early or is it a bit more forgiving?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say somewhere in the middle... not to early and not to forgiving either.

[@hikebot]

Haven't seen a review in a while, your during has improved a bunch! Ripping 🤙

[@edawg654]

Hey Noel. Patron here. I’m choosing between this board and the fever for a daily driver in Indo for a couple months.. which is better and any others you might recommend? Cheers

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Fever is better in 4-8’ surf… you can hold the rail Better in overhead surf. The I72 shred 3-6’ surf and it’s a great daily but it’s not my board of choice in 6’+ surf. Hard to bury the rail in bigger surf

[@edawg654]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 awesome Noel. Thanks so much for the advice, you are a legend dude. Regards from a kiwi living in Portugal

[@alexhoward4880]

Hey Noel, can u help me out - is rocker important to get into hollow waves, or can low rocker do the trick since you’ve got more speed coming in? Trying to figure out if the seaside can handle steep waves down south. Thanks man love the content!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Seaside can handle it a bit but might not ideal in really hollow waves.

[@alexhoward4880]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 appreciate it!

[@sean5644]

6’0 150lbs. I run a 5’10 27L PU driver 2.0 and a 5’9 26L light speed driver 2.0. I enjoy the pop of the lightspeed. Do you like the dark arts IF72 or light speed driver 2.0? Should I keep my volume in the same range as my light speed?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I like the I72 better in Dark Arts. Keep the volume the same as your Driver Lightspeed…. Roughly 26L

[@tyronemones9557]

Awesome review as always Noel. Been waiting for your thoughts on this board and just as I suspected, a favorite and you categorized it as a one board quiver. That says a lot. I got a hold of this board about a week ago and know exactly what you mean how it performs in the pocket and flow. Mahalo🤙🏽

[@chriss6971]

The PU looked smoother under your feet or maybe it's just what i'm used watching from surf comps.

[@jose2x784]

Great review 💪 do you know how the I72 would be in mushy or smaller waves like 2ft?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

So so

[@marieaugier8128]

How would you compare this board to the lost driver 2.0 ?

[@JohnBallantyne-i7b]

Hi Noel, have you tried this board in Sharpeyes epoxy tech? What do you think of their epoxy vs pu?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I have not tried their epoxy tech. I am sure it goes good. Give it a go….

[@georgemichalakis6673]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Hi Noel! do you have any plans on the inferno FT?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@georgemichalakis6673 Yes

[@nickymarshall4890]

Hey Noel. I watched this review and the Sharpeye Storms review back to back and they sound like the same board :) What would you say are the key points of difference? Thanks.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

They are pretty similar on paper… the I72 is a bit more user friendly, it carries a little more speed down the line and more flow. Two very important attributes for me.

[@squidword1453]

Hi Noel HUGE FAN of your channel ❤ I’m looking to get a HPSB for average surf and I’m pretty much a front foot surfer what will u say be my best option? Thanks in advance

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Maybe go I72 in Swallow or Round Tail

[@squidword1453]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 unfortunately my only option is a squash tail I was thinking maybe a sub driver 2? Or any other surfboards you think will be best ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@squidword1453 Sub Driver 2.0 is good

[@scottjamieson501]

Hi Noel you were shredding on the i72!!! Need some advice I’m looking at the storms and the i72 for 1-6ft surf. Which would you recommend

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

That’s easy... I72. It’s a Favorite of mine... the Storms is solid but not a Favorite

[@scottjamieson501]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 what would you suggest in terms of sizing? im 5ft 6 and 145lbs and currently riding 28.5l and I consider myself to be an intermediate surfer.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@scottjamieson501 Roughly 28L sounds good for your weight and skill level. Do you prefer your HPSB length your height or shorter?

[@scottjamieson501]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I don’t like too much board out in front of me so I’m aiming to stay at around 5’8 in length

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@scottjamieson501 Sounds good to me

[@coalitiongrenerd]

Noel, hopefully not too late for a questions. I have been surfing a 6'1 x 20 x 2.625 (32.4L). I am 6'2, 183lbs. Board feels big to me, feels like it sits up on the water too much when cutting back. What're your thoughts on my dims/how I can correct if I were to re-purchase. Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I suggest trying a medium raked set of fins like the Al Merrick fins. Maybe you are getting a little to much lift and a medium fin can sometimes help the rails engage more and make the board looser

[@coalitiongrenerd]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks for the quick response, you're always on it. I am running Futures JJF Large, I have a pair of AM2's ill try, unless you suggest something else.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@coalitiongrenerd Try those first

[@4221tbone]

Hi Noel, I'm a 90kg Int/Adv Power Surfer. I love ramming my board on rail, it's how I've always surfed. I Have the CI Happy but I really can't get along with it.... Will this design cater for the heavy footed surfer and hold thorough turns? Cheers

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Quick question for you first.... what board in the past has worked good for you?

[@4221tbone]

Sorry for the late reply Noel, I'm also 183cm Tall.. I had a 6' 0" Sci Fi for my everyday board and a 6' 4" DMS Actor (Dan Mcdonald) For the bigger Perth days and Margaret River (Wester Australia). I replaced my DMS with the 6' 2" CI Happy. Thanks Noel, loving your channel mate and the tutorials are in depth and understandable, it has helped me technique wise to tweak my already capable surfing with small queues to remember..

[@4221tbone]

@surfnshow

[@jaysonwebsther2698]

Another great review Sir Noel, just wanna ask what you can recommend for futures fins or for future finbox types of fins that would be suitable for this I72? hope to hear your response cause I'm getting this sled by end of the months once my salary arrive hehe.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

You can ride the Al Merrick fins or the new Jordy's will go good too. I highly recommend my MS-Raked Template. There is nothing like them... check them out here.... www.shopsurfnshow.com/collections/fins/products/surf-n-show-thruster-rakes

[@jaysonwebsther2698]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks Sir.

[@jaysonwebsther2698]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks, does the Ms-Raked template has size small fins cause I'm at 132.27 pounds(60kilos)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@jaysonwebsther2698 I recommend the MS-Neutral template. It will be looser for you.

[@gustavovampre7707]

Awesome review Noel! Super keen to hear your thoughts on the Lost Pocket Rocket, any plans on reviewing it?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

No sorry... not at this time

[@kpkim2343]

Hi Noel. I recently got 2 shadow surfboards in both PU and Dartarts. both are the same thickness 2 5/16”. I have noticed dartarts seems have fuller rail and thicker than PU. I am just wondering if it happened to you as well and i want to clarify if its natural to dartarts. I have asked supplier for it, though. please, let me know your experience.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

My I72 PU and Dark Arts rails felt the same to me.

[@kpkim2343]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thank you!

[@emilianoespinoza1681]

Hey Noel! I'm trying to decide between this and the Pyzel Phantom as a daily driver for 2-6ft surf; just wanted to know which one you personally would like better for all ranges of waves in SoCal from weak mushy to powerful hollow waves and breaks?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Phantom paddles better, easy to surf, carries more speed and like to carve. The I72 offers more vertical pocket surfing and shreds waves like a HPSB but easier to surf due to it having less overall rocker. The I72 carries excellent speed and it’s more user friendly compared to a normal HPSB but the Phantom has less rocker and a bit more glide.

[@emilianoespinoza1681]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Noted, thanks for the input it really helps! You're the best resource out here for average joes, thanks again!

[@facundosaid5490]

Hi Noel, how would you compare it to the og flyer? Thanks

[@anthippo91]

I usually ride around a 5’8 (25.5L) PU I’m around 146lbs currently and going of the stock dims I’d get a 5’8 (18 3/4 2 3/8) which is 25.3 litres do you think these stock dims would be ok for the pu model of this board I only ask due to seeing some comments about litres and thickness being different in this board.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Absolutely

[@southwig18]

Damn Noel, both looked good but that PU goes like butter under your feet.

[@sebastianclerey3207]

Can you review/have you ever ridden the CI Black Beauty?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

No sorry.... that board design does not fit my home breaks.

[@mattcbass808]

Would this be a good replacement for my phantom?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The Phantom paddles better, likes to carve more too. This I72pivots quicker in the pocket and it a bit more radical too. The Phantom is easier to surf and a little more forgiving. Both boards are insane and you want to push your progress surfing and draw tighter turns in the pocket then go I72

[@mattcbass808]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks.

[@kieranbacon5905]

Hey Noel, super keen on getting one in PU, just wanted to know how the I72 handles over to double overhead surf?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

A little overhead it’s good... double overhead it will struggle. The I72 is ideal for 3-6’ surf.

[@soulsurfer3102]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 for 6-7.-8foot .p2?or sb 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@soulsurfer3102 I say Pyzalien 2

[@soulsurfer3102]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thx

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@soulsurfer3102 If the surf is big and hollow then consider the Shadow too

[@thomaskruth643]

Trying to decide between a I72 and Flat Earth. Mostly surf SoCal 2-4ft both point and beach break. Any rec?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Both boards are really fun. The FE offers a little more versatility with fin options. You can shred it with Twin + Trailer in 2-6’ surf or pure Twin Fin in Shoulder high and smaller.

[@thomaskruth643]

Awesome thanks! Super appreciate it. That might suit me better and be more fun.

[@thomaskruth643]

Might wait for that review between the diff of the Dark Twinn and the FE first though ahahah

[@eranherzog3467]

Hi Noel, I took the board to the Maldives and it worked amazing but when I surf it home it stuck. I surf most of the time on 2-4 feet waves. I tried to replace the fins but it doesn't work. usually, I surf on Timmy Patterson I15 and it works better for me. any ideas why it is stuck in not-so-good surf?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

How much do you weigh? What size fins are you using? What is the board doing or not doing that you don’t like?

[@eranherzog3467]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I'm 70 kg its 5.8 - 26.6L. I tried to surf on several medium sets mb, CI upright. I tried to switch the central fin to a smaller one. I feel that the board is very heavy and stiff under my feet, its hard to get speed. With my I15 I am much more loosely and have much more speed.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@eranherzog3467 If the board is heavy in weight that will make it feel stiff and hard to get it in the lip quickly. Is the board heavy?

[@eranherzog3467]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 its heavier than my TP I15 but it is not too heavy.

[@eranherzog3467]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 it is better to ride on the Dark arts in smaller waves because it's lighter? most of the time I surf on mushy 2-3 feet. the board suited to this type of conditions?

[@jameszebert]

Amazing review. How does this compare to the sharp eye storm? Which one would you recommend for a heavier intermediate surfer looking to improve?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The I73 offers a little more performance in overhead surf compared to the Storms. The Storms might shred small waves a little better though. I like the I72 better…

[@nmcmatic]

Dude your channel is so good! Thank you!

[@underwaterlifestyle]

How would a round pin custom ordered board differ?

[@Blazerelf]

Hi Noel, would you recommend this board for an early intermediate as a daily driver or is it too advance and would be better to progress from other alternatives? Have being thinking between Pyzalien2, rocket redux or this one

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say the Phantom is a better board… it’s more user friendly and paddles better.

[@Blazerelf]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 hey Noel I know you recommended the phantom which i do find really cool, but I’m really interested in getting a eps board and for some reason Pyzel no longer makes on that construction. Is there any other alternative board you recommend which might be close to phantom? Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@Blazerelf then go I72

[@henriquevert]

hi Noel... which has more paddle power: Inferno72 or SubDriver 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Roughly the same… the SD 2.0 suits a neutral to front footed surfers better. The I72 seems to suit all 3 orientations better making it a little more user friendly.

[@checkmate7312]

Im 6ft tall. 160-165lbs. Been surfing for 25years. 5ft Hawaiian scale max. Mostly 2-4ft. Any recommendations as far as board dimensions and volume. I currently surf a 5'10"×20"×2 3/8" fish that rips in 2-4ft surf.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Here are some good liter ranges for your weight at different skill levels. Pro/Expert 26-28L Advanced 28-30L Intermediate 31-33L

[@checkmate7312]

Cool. Thanks a bunch guys. My board is very old so its time to turn a new leaf and pick up a new board. I am gaining a ton of knowledge from your videos as there is always room to learn and improve. Btw, you rip man!😎👍🔥

[@ФедорМорев-г3ш]

Thank you for the review! How would you compare it with the Driver 2.0 from Lost? Looks very close :)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Both boards are epic… I like the I72 better in smaller waves in Dark Arts. It’s faster, more maneuverable and explosive through turns.

[@ФедорМорев-г3ш]

@@stevelee6364 thought maybe also try driver 2.0 and compare what I like more)

[@ФедорМорев-г3ш]

@@stevelee6364 I think also right now maybe try 2.0 to compare what I like more :) Do you have them the same dims?

[@stevelee6364]

@@ФедорМорев-г3ш yea man roughly same dims. 72 is 1/8 wider, half liter more. both are pu

[@ThePokersurfer]

Not a big fan of dark colored decks due to heat attraction however you can customize a different color with them. You should look into Coil Industries Alien Technology out of Florida with their patented golf ball like construction because the projection is similar. Also if you've ever tried a CI MTF-A it's another amazing sprung forward surfboard due to it's tail shape!

[@hugoegon1]

another epic review, what about throwing a set of T1 in there?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Give it a try

[@video1critic]

In 2 to 4 foot, the Inferno 72, the NB2, or the Sampler Noel?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Tough one… I say NB2 for speed and progression and the I72 better all around for carves, snaps, and pocket surfing. Sampler does not compare to these other two boards

[@JulioBoulay]

Love your videos. Between the SharpEye "Inferno 72" and the CI "Fever", which would you say is more accesible? Would you say they are similar boards?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Fever goes better in 5-8’ surf, it has more foiled rails so it cuts through the water easier. The I72 goes better as a small wave performance board / daily driver. I would be stocked with either. My choice is I72 for 1-4’ shredding in EPS or Dark Arts, and the Fever as my HPSB best in 4-8’ surf PU/Poly.

[@1604ben]

Hi Noel, i have a quick question regarding dim. I m 5.8 and weight 149 lb, i usually ride board in between 26 and 27 liter. I am about to order a I72 in dark arts and i am torn between getting the 5.8 with 25,5 liters and the 5.9 in 26,7 liters. What would you recommend ? It’ s for Europe (France / spain) and i am used to ride eps/ futureflex boards. Regards.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say go 5’8” and it will float like 26-26.5L. The 5’9” will float like 27.2-27.5L. The 5’9” will be hard to control in 4-6’ surf especially if it choppy conditions

[@1604ben]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks a lot for you r reply. I ll go for the 5’8 then. I really appreciate the time you r passing to help us. Regards

[@teamcamaleon]

Hi Noel, i am a patreon supporter and i would like to ask you wich 3 boards of this list would you take to maldives in october: Inferno 72, cabianca the medina squash , fishbeard , fever , ghost , neck beard 3 , uber driver xl or rocket wide. Intermediate level. Wave range 3" to 6 overhead

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I say I72, Fever, Ghost

[@TheDazboo]

You mentioned that the 26L felt like a 27l when paddling-In your opinion if you normally ride 26L could you order 25L and be okay?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Yes, I wish my Inferno 72 in Dark Arts was 25L. I would have more control and sink the rail faster especially in textured or choppy surf.

[@TheDazboo]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Perfect-thanks again so much

[@orangshoes21]

Hey Noel, I’m trying to decide between a driver 2.0 in light speed at 29.5 liters or a dark arts inferno 72 at 30 liters. If you personally had to choose for 2-6 foot surf, which would you choose? Is one more forging than the other or harder to control? Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Both boards are excellent. I say I72 in Dark Arts.

[@orangshoes21]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks so much. Does the dark arts i72 feel too hard to control in head high surf? Were you able to bury your rail fine?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@orangshoes21 It was a little hard for me… I wish I ordered it 1/2 to 1 whole liter less. So if I like my volume at roughly 26L then I wish my Dark Arts I72 volume was 25L

[@marshallchang2297]

Hey Noel, comprehensive review as usual, thanks. Noticed that you ordered this board thicker than your usual boards in this category. Also noticed stock dims are significantly thicker for the same amount of volume for comparable boards. When I felt one in the shop they felt like they were quite bulky in the middle rail section. Question is, should I order this board thicker than usual due to the design? I usually ride 2 3/8 thick 28-29L but stock is 2 1/2 28.8L so volume is right, but thickness seems too much? How did you go with the thicker dims?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I liked mine with the fuller rail in 1-4’ surf. If your going to surf it in 4-6’ surf on a regular basis then you might want to slim it down a little and add 1” in length. Call the folks at SharpEye too.

[@MyMotherWasaNinja]

Confusing right? I would get a custom with your usual thickness. I went with stock dims and regret it.

[@henriquevert]

hi Noel… I see that on most boards, you use 18 7/8 and some even less. Why is your Inferno72 19? Does this board work with greater width than you normally use?

[@craig8638]

Is it me or are there some sizable dents on the deck of the carbon board?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Yes there are some dents on the Carbon board. The PU/Poly was ridden a few more times after we shot the talking points for this review... meaning I was not done surfing the PU/Poly until the day before we launched it on Saturday for our Patrons.

[@surfershaper]

If shapers made boards that wouldn't break they would lose annual $ales! Disposable is the way

[@craig8638]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thought the point of carbon is longevity?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@craig8638 I made that clear in this review…. The Carbon layup offers that new board pop and projection long after a PU/Poly would feel dead. Pressure dents don’t kill a board…. It’s the lack of pop or rebound that a PU/Poly looses over a short period of usage. If you want no pressure dents then check out a Surftech TL Pro Carbon…. However the flex is not explosive like the Dark Arts.

[@craig8638]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks for the response. I’ve been looking at boards on their site and might try one. Keep up the good work. You have the best reviews on the web.

[@RBNK157]

how is it compared to the Xero Gravity ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@RBNK157 I think the Gravity has more overall rocker and narrower nose and tail. The Gravity looks more like a Cali HPSB

[@RBNK157]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 which one would you prefer?

[@nickbrown7955]

Hey Noel, would the R8 Vapor Core fins go good in this?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Yes in head high waves and under. To much flex for me in over head waves.

[@dkilla01]

How would you feel taking the board out in bigger surf?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

It tops out at for me at roughly 6’ surf.