Sig P365 SAS Review (TIS412)

[@sinisterthoughts2896]

A well thought out review. I appreciate the perspectives you chose to employ, especially from a design and engineering standpoint. So many people are completely unaware of those aspects.

[@herknorth8691]

That offset scope looks interesting.

[@kenchilton]

I like it. I just wish it was a shrouded hammer design and not striker fired. Thanks for reviewing it. The sight discussion and demonstration was extremely helpful.

[@jim9689]

This fellow gives new meaning to the lyrics "Living in your own private Idaho".

[@idahorodgersusmc]

I'm a huge fan of the 365. My edc is 365xl.. literally replaced my Browning HP. 1 round less capacity, and half the weight.

[@wadekirby8575]

You can adjust the firing pin protrusion by trimming some of the plastic parts of the striker assembly. (That should make it less ammo picky, if done correctly.) My main problem with the 365 family is the random trigger return spring life. Some of them last thousands and thousands of rounds, some do not. (SIG sells them in 3 packs.)

[@LittlyLary]

I would prefer the safety on a pistol I'm going to pocket carry! I don't have an issue with my jframe but that trigger is a lot different than what a P365 has

[@xxxlonewolf49]

The flush sights is made for MinuteOfMan at conversion distances. Beyond that is pray TheLord guide your hands.

[@EvolveProgress]

I own a Sig 365 SAS...it takes getting used to.

[@xxxlonewolf49]

Pistol in a pocket = fail Pistol without a round in the chamber = fail