Your information is superior! That's for this knowledge
@arsitech-ltd4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for appreciation dear, I hope CAE users get benifit from it.
@abhishekkuksal57004 жыл бұрын
@@arsitech-ltd Yes, indeed!
@AJ-et3vf2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Thank you
@arsitech-ltd2 жыл бұрын
Welcome dear.
@ahalgamal2 жыл бұрын
Very useful video, thanks for the information shared
@arsitech-ltd2 жыл бұрын
Welcome dear.
@sudheers44113 жыл бұрын
That was helpful. Thanks!
@cabalio932 жыл бұрын
At the start of the video you show us that the static tool is the one from the left, where you measure the RF, then when you proceed with the example set-up you apply the rotation on that tool, wich was supposed to be static, i do not understand
@arsitech-ltd2 жыл бұрын
Dear, Maximum reaction force will be generate on fixed ends only. Here I used reference point of static tool to plot reaction force.
@anu6562 Жыл бұрын
sir I am solving a same problem with implicit and explicit. in implicit the kinetic energy is less and internal energy dominant but in explicit kinetic energy is getting dominant? when does this happen? I am not clear, if you can explain. It is a low velocity problem.
@arsitech-ltd Жыл бұрын
Dear, Are you using same time period for both steps? Make sure un implicit it should not be quasi-static step.
@Bala926352 жыл бұрын
as per the definition implicit is used for oscillations (structural dynamics) and explicit can be used when there is large deformation but still here in example both are giving same result why.
@arsitech-ltd2 жыл бұрын
Dear, You must watch all videos of topic "implicit and explicit" on my channel.