Star Citizen » P72 Archimedes

We have a good look around the new P72. Looks great.
► Support me on Patreon and be a space hero - goo.gl/7cEnbB
► Join me on Twitch - / tacticaladvance
► Hangout in Discord - / discord
Sign up on the RSI site and get 5,000 UEC free - goo.gl/nGSWzO
Connect with me:
Star Citizen Org - goo.gl/UE3Gj9
TA Website - goo.gl/yGs3Se
Facebook - goo.gl/Bi4MOH
Twitch - goo.gl/792VnG
Twitter - goo.gl/xdIvjP
Star Citizen Videos & Reviews
#StarCitizen #squadron42 #TacticalAdvance

[@CujoHyer]

Obi-Wan Kenobi would approve of one of these.

[@OGTabo0]

Obi hates flying :/

[@CaptainSaber7]

Only if it had a circular quantum drive dock thingy along with a droid he could address right down his nose.

[@giant3dorangutanmodel89]

@@CaptainSaber7 ‘tis called a hyperdrive ring, it allows smaller craft to enter hyperspace and operate independent of a larger vessel

[@Aluzard]

first thing I noticed is how the nose part when you say look notice the thrusters.. is that it looks like a shark head =D

[@jeizen]

I'm sure it's been said, but the tip looks like a shark's head with the headlights and two-toned paint design.

[@MrDreiPner]

I want a heavy fighter...

[@WabbitCrouton]

Good looking ship. I do worry about those guns under the wings. You lose the wings, you lose the pew-pew.

[@robertschumacher2707]

The Archie here is so lightly built it's unlikely you'll lose both wings before it explodes.

[@powerzox8326]

I know I’m late but can you remove the guns?

[@robertschumacher2707]

@@powerzox8326 You can, but not much point disarming your ship completely. If you were wondering if you can swap them for something else, also yes.

[@TheMrRedavenger]

OMG makes me think about when you are going to do the 890 jump, how long that would take XD --> Looking forward to it ;)

[@Furstaide]

I'm fortunate to have four of these for LTI tokens on buyback and had previously given one away. Great little ship. Well done CIG. Thanks for the video TA

[@Texas240]

Good job finding a good lighting and background. You can tell the artist took pride in his work. I was also surprised to see 4 pointy bits on the wings instead of 2 plus one centerline. I also miss the beefy round thrust exhaust on the 300 series, especially the 350R with its dual thrusters. Now, we just need NPCs that we can hire to transport it.

[@ericwollaston5654]

TA, love your ship reviews so much - thorough, paced well, and honest. We all know that the Origin style guide took over the 300 series, i understand the conformity reasons for design and lore. BUT the M50 hopefully will step outside the mold due to its singular nature. Keep it up, good sir!

[@davidwilliams4615]

i love the way the back end of this looks the 350 would look great like this

[@SubNinety]

Great vid Tac! I'm sure the Constellation Phoenix owners are happy about this one.

[@ATC_Forgiven]

Nice review. Thanks

[@Aluzard]

nice video btw, I also own a Phoenix and can't wait to test this out.

[@g.galordy9853]

She’s looking fantastic. Great video !

[@canny8228]

Been waiting for this little bugger for quite some time. Gonna try it out in 3.6 tonight.

[@Vizzo69s]

Nice review!

[@Matt43]

It's a fast little ship, check it out in the PTU!

[@xxxarcanisxxx3678]

Great ship , nice video!

[@jasongiles7897]

Those engine flaps are actuated they go in and out to create more push when closed more...more pressure the smaller the actuators are.

[@redvivid]

*thrust

[@joshuaclark1461]

Can i get it in black with red accents or is it just white and yellow? Reminds me of the starfox fighter for some reason. Would also like some mirrors like in actual fighter planes. Very nice interior, luxury fighter plane? Glad it flies well enough. Totally want one.

[@LordTiberius52]

Well, I've got one in my melt box From last anniversary sale. So I'll likely buy it back soon. I like having a Merlin as a quick spawn ship to de spawn something I don't want to leave on the Pad. But the Merlin is very pathetic. And I'm looking forward to racing with the Archimedes. Seeing if those 4 cannons are capable

[@murphylawson9859]

I looove this one ! It only lacks a navigation system to be able to locate points of interest.

[@Texas240]

It lacks a quantum drive to be able to get to those points of interest. The ferry ship will have all the nav you need.

[@murphylawson9859]

@@Texas240 nope, I will need more. You can't even see points of interest on a moon or planet to be able to know where you are and get where you wanna go even if it's 3 km away from you. A nav system is not to be an option on any ship. I don't mind the lack of quantum, I mind being almost blind.

[@Texas240]

@@murphylawson9859 - yeah. I get what ur saying there. I thot u meant quantum nav, not local. At least they've recently addressed that need, although no timetable on it

[@-_Nuke_-]

2:10 reminds of of a shark :D

[@danielwlodawer1282]

Nice ship... would like if they move the weapons more inwards. Makes no sense to have them on the folding part of the wing. Better convergence and better roll rate.

[@PintoW0Sl]

Great Review

[@KuraIthys]

I'm kinda sad I no longer have access to a 600i explorer. I mean, I tried to test what fit on the vehicle lift during the free fly event, but people kept nicking the 600i when my back was turned... I was hoping to test an m50,85x, a p52 (since the 72 wasn't ingame yet), and to try and get a sense of how large the 300 series is relative to the loading door. Even though that lift in the 600i is designed for a ground vehicle, I have a sneaking suspicion the really small craft might just fit... But, can't test that anymore. I mean, I have a 600i, but it's the touring model. So... Until such time as module swapouts are ingame - and the modules are purchasable as well (since the 600i is claimed to be modular), I guess I won't be trying any of those tests again. XD (Well, in 3.6 most ships can be bought ingame, but I dread to think how much a 600i will cost... I mean, it's not going to be directly related to the real world purchase price, but given the cost of a constellation phoenix, I'd have to think it'd end up being at least 10 million UEC...)

[@ShaminMike]

Holy crap that is an awesome ship! Might have to get me one of them!

[@Texas240]

Just remember that it doesn't have quantum drive capability! You'll need something to transport it if you need to go farther than cruise speed can reasonably get you.

[@ShaminMike]

Good to remember thanks!

[@commanderroddi7742]

It kind of looks like the Halo sword from the top!

[@Leispada]

Tactical Air-vents here!

[@ramonebrown5704]

what size are the weapons

[@fredashay]

If you look closely at 1:15, it looks like the ship is vibrating. Is that a bug in the game? Or some artifact of your video rendering software?

[@ToxicFlight]

4 years ago was the p-52 Merlin

[@zealinbarden3942]

I feel this ship was based off the P-51D Mustang

[@JonMcMenamin777]

That view though...

[@KoPT01]

I guess Tactical Advance forgot to let the video fully process before making it public!

[@xloltimex38]

And? Earlier access to us

[@darjanator]

The Merlin was reworked a long time ago and other than wing tips and the central nose vent, it's identical. o_O Must really have been AGES ago when you did the review.

[@dominicgunderson]

I'm not sure if you're joking or not but this ship just came out along with the Merlin rework.

[@darjanator]

@@dominicgunderson The Merlin rework is barely noticeable and only if you have them side by side. Elwin Bachilor Jr. said in Inside Star Citizen Ep. 9 that the changes are just clean-up to the geometry for optimization. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gmGWZ4yFf9BsrKs This version of the Merlin has been in game for years. It was first teased on 30th April 2015: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iZrKh5eDmZtpi7c And made it into the game in the PTU in 1.1.5 on in July 2015. Here's the accompanying RSI website post: robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14854-Kruger-Intergalactic-P-52-Merlin-Now-Available HMMM????

[@tawesssoabbox]

That looks like a very angry little ship. But also very sweet. Now if the game could just bloody release.. that would be nice.

[@AgentXRifle]

It sure would be nice… 😆

[@Charok1]

I want to fly it near the ground on planets instead of the bikes

[@EffortlessEthan]

same

[@asildogustaskn1903]

Do you know if the game supports 21:9 now?

[@TheRyanDudeMan]

It has for a while

[@travistolbert2647]

I demand CIG release a snarling shark/animal mouth skin for the Archimedes! Lol

[@S.G.W.C.]

I would create a pirate org based something aground sharks concept and have snarling teeth paint job on these like they used to do on WWII fighter planes

[@ThunderspearNZ]

I dont see the point of a ship with no quantum travel and no cargo. Someone explain that to me.

[@SpaceJohnWayne]

PUBG needs to take a lesson on roundness xD

[@Camo2oxalex]

Is this a steam game or a xbox or ps4 game look good

[@Wi3fa]

Any one else think it looks like a corvette

[@kewlboi5420]

I love you tac

[@IrremeableMach]

Best looking ship in the verse, too bad she can't travel alone.

[@xloltimex38]

Yea. And you cant even spawn the conni to fly it to other systems it will just despawn

[@danielpeterson6987]

So much air intake no heatsinker will never find it for the engines and it's release of it blasters would be ice cold no heat Sinker will ever find it and on aerodynamics of it also makes you think it's invisible to radar with all the radar and antenna stack to show where it's at.

[@velocitymg]

Really not a fan of the long nose, cockpit to the rear design just looks very unbalanced with all the aircrafts weight to the rear. Reminds me of a futuristic Gee Bee racer, only reason this was required in a Gee Bee, or another long nose such as the f4u Corsair was due to the size of the piston engine hanging out front which isn’t really a problem with these craft.

[@SilverWolfPL]

What about SCM & cruise speed, acceleration, maneuverability values? How can You review racing ship without at least mentioning some of this data?

[@liemsolow3697]

360p Squad, where we at?

[@susananavarro3452]

Hi! I’m early!

[@Sneemaster]

hey Tactical Advance, when you start your videos are you saying "Tactical Advanc-eh" or "Tactical Advance here"? It is a little hard for me to tell. Granted my ears aren't great, especially different accents. Always wanted to ask that.

[@baladeva3771]

minus on engine sound effect.

[@Zenn_Chan]

I can't believe you've managed to stick with this game, I gave up on it years ago :(

[@TheTonkGuy]

First :D

[@valentin9237]

And ??

[@evelynnmain6707]

360P!!

[@bailey2624]

flight model is SHIT . ships fly the same as in space to me. they should fly like a normal jet in earth like atmosphere and drift when you CHOOSE to use extra thrusters of the future. kinda seems poinless what they did with it

[@dontwobble]

please change your introduction, its very annoying.