Star Wars Outlaws' New Creative Director Promises To Fix The Game - Luke Reacts

[@Ryan_Bolton11]

Pro tip for ubisoft: do that before you release a game

[@boitmecklyn4995]

do it in the pre-production phase :D

[@granujja]

that would be so revolutionary

[@frankylampard3931]

Its a tip for 9/10 AAA studios at this point tbf. Cyberpunk wasn't only performance , they revamped and redesigned the whole game like 2 years later

[@M1tZk1]

That's why the new AC got pushed back.

[@jaydeeao]

Hold up, wait a minute......you can't do that. You're cheating! You're using logic and reasoning, and that's not far......hahahaha

[@Boyahda]

They had 4 years to fix it.

[@mattbrown9631]

it was going to be a breakout success during that entire time though. Then, oops.

[@intothevoid2046]

It's probably more about the upcoming season pass expansions than the base game. It's also not broken but badly designed in some areas, that is different. I dropped because of the design decisions, not because I had problems with it. Bugs can be fixed, gameplay must be redesigned. If you think your gameplay is good, there is no need to act until you get the player feedback, at which point you might wish you'd have done it differently..... Glad they do it now instead of never.

[@Choryrth]

@@intothevoid2046 it's both broken, and terribly designed all across the board.

[@CAPCOM784]

It'll take another 4 years and still won't be fixed 100%.

[@CAPCOM784]

​@@intothevoid2046It is broken with so many bugs. Even if they worked on this game another few years it'll never preform 100% without the bugs and glitches.

[@DacianGradaMusic]

Imagine actually doing that, but before launch. What a novel concept, revolutionary even! 🤯

[@trembledust6819]

come on. thats been EA's biz model for a few decades now. why fix what isn't broken? see what I did there ? :)

[@DistinctionDino]

@@DacianGradaMusic honestly, would’ve probably sold better if they postponed the game to like may 4th or something like that too.

[@BGIANAKy]

@@trembledust6819that’s actually not fair. EA has dropped some decent titles of recent.

[@ess1405]

So Ubisoft decided to finish their unfinished game and they call it "total revamp" 😂

[@granujja]

it's a next-gen update 🤣

[@LimmeLimbo]

I mean, CDPR robbed yall, threw a pile of hot trash in your faces and then “fixed” a game over the course of 4 years but that wont stop yall from saying Cyberpunk is still one of the best games lol

[@BeardedMugiwara]

​@LimmeLimbo who's to say they bought Cyberpunk not everyone did lol I sure as hell didn't

[@RnBDynamite]

​@@LimmeLimbo CDPR got destroyed, as in almost lost it all, for overpromising and under delivering one of the most hyped title of the decade in Cyberpunk 2077 that was unplayable for a lot of people at launch. However, we could all see that there was genuine quality buried under the problems at launch and they have (mostly) fixed and updated the game into one of the best games available right now. I don't see Star Wars Outlaw having the same quality that Cyberpunk 2077 currently has, no matter how much fixes and updates they will give the game. And that is personally why I think it is stupid for us to compare the two games.

[@LimmeLimbo]

@@BeardedMugiwara Its crazy cuz I bought it. Right after Phantom Liberty dropped. Literally one of the best games I ever played. But the double standards people have when it comes to Ubisoft is clear. Ubisoft is the only company that can drop a solid well made game and still underperform and get dragged JUST because they made it. It’s literally only because they made it, all that stuff about their business practices or nitpicking every flaw in their game to make it seem worse than it is is just plausible deniability

[@staskozak8118]

One of my friends is a tester at Ubisoft. "We write about a bug - they ignore us"

[@kendrickbanks7946]

1. Make a bad game 2. Transferred to make another game while someone takes your place to fix your last game. SOLID LEADERSHIP

[@shinichiizumi2242]

right lol ubisoft decisions sound like they're company is run by complete out of touch idiots

[@robertron5303]

Why not release it finished & polished in the first place? Scam

[@hendricksausges3006]

We really should not allow them to get away with this. Do not buy. Do not promote. Completely ignore Star wars outlaws.

[@Abcd-ti9wv]

Star Wars license force you to release game before a specific date, else you pay a fine

[@ltw126]

The same reason cyberpunk was garbage. People just don’t care about buggy games as much as they should.

[@CAPCOM784]

​@@hendricksausges3006Yes 100% agree

[@ricardotaut7498]

Ubisoft fixing this is about as likely as Bethesda fixing Starfield. The core is rotten, just move on.

[@EasterlySumo868]

What cyberpunk should have done. So rotten lmao

[@startthebengine]

I very much agree. It reminds me of Anthem. The problem isn’t that they released it half baked. It’s that they had a bad recipe in the first place.

[@EasterlySumo868]

@@startthebengine yes. Every once in a blue moon I’ll download it. But like cars despawn. Still glitchy. Loose food when walk into stores. Like so much crap that gta 3 did better. I heard the story is good. But I can’t even get to that. Idk it’s crazy I hear people love it. But if it was Ubisoft people would say so much crap still.

[@staskozak8118]

@@EasterlySumo868, core was ok but buggy.

[@k4yser]

@EasterlySumo868 you got to be playing on a toaster. Even on release I rarely encountered any bugs in cyberpunk. The embarrassing bug reels posted on the internet were largely on the PS4 version, which was a mistake in general. The game is really good and got way better. Now cyberpunk is one of the best modern first person games, if not the best. Again, your hardware sounds too inferior to run it, otherwise I can't understand the issues you are complaining about. Even on ps5 the game's runs good.

[@royjones0824]

I’m not going to jump and cheer because a company decided to do their job 😂😂😂congratulations you are now functioning lol

[@altair4849]

Right? 😅 like are they expecting a celebration for fixing something that wasn't ready for launch?

[@royjones0824]

@@altair4849 lol like real talk this is why gaming is so bad now because people’s standards are so low .. making a video about a broken game and saying we don’t need to want this company to fail( they taking care of that themselves) I remember the GameCube era there was no 6.1 updates I remember the 360 era games had dlc to add to the game not add storylines that finished the actual main story to the game like a new game is 70 dollars now and that’s the base the standard issue and we the bad guys/girls because we want fun games that aren’t buggy or broke smh my ps5 is honestly collecting dust while I hop on my Nintendo 64

[@DubberRucks]

Fr yet people seem hellbent on saying "oh but praise devs for fixing bugs; they're listening to us at least". Nah nah! Bug fixes are the BARE MINIMUM TESTING that should be done before launch 😂

[@65firered]

Well they promised to do their job, they also promised this would be a good game. Their promises don't mean much.

[@kukuricapica]

@@royjones0824 The biggest problem is that market is bloated with substandard shit. You got litteraly thousands of games to play. we used to get 4 blockbuster games a year that everyone played and they were all great. Now the standard is so low that if you make a C+ game IGN will score is as 9,5/10 lol. Gamers should not tollerate 70eur games for unfinished products or even worse a bad product. i'm glad that they are commiting to fixing this game but they would have to do the same thing as CD RED and i dont think they are that commited. It would mean overhall cities mechanic, bounty mechanics, stealth mechanics, A.I and most important the whole world should react to player and his choises. I havent played the game but from what i have seen even in the story anything you do seems to have no impact on the world around you. In CP2077 there are few choices that impact quests or even certain factions that will be either friendly or hostile. This will take time and more like patch 2.0

[@Bjorn_R]

Free golden nugget advice for Ubisoft. Interact with a focus group of gamers and have them test the game with a signed NDA. People who are not invested in the game are more likely to find faults and complain about a product, which would useful info before launch

[@kellywilson137]

They probably did, they just didn't listen.

[@BTRshow]

They probably did and chose ro release the game anyway to save money

[@Jaguar21010]

They very much need unbiased focus groups of real gamers. Because they do not right now at all. If there are testers they are still within the ubi echo chamber

[@asdadsgsaadasf6043]

If they're hiring people who are bad at making games, they're also hiring people who are bad for QA, bad for market analysis, etc. The issue cannot be fixed because it's systemic, and then they're shocked to find their product doesn't resonate with consumers. The only conclusion they can come to is to keep trying to make the same mistakes in different ways. Like, you have a huge demographic of guys who would potentially buy this game that obviously didn't. That's Star War's main demographic, it's guys. Make the main character attractive, give her some fun costumes and make her personality appeal to those players. There's no reason this character couldn't have been the next Lara Croft (the old one, not the boring redesign). Stellar Blade was maybe a 7/10 game IMO that got crazy word of mouth because it actually tried to appeal to it's core demographic. Like, the industry has been put into this position where they have to rediscover fire, but they aren't allowed to bang rocks together or rub sticks, so they're all just standing around in the dark shrugging and blaming everyone else. That's not even getting into all the obvious problems with the gameplay that could've been called out by people who actually play video games.

[@staskozak8118]

@@Jaguar21010, one of my friends is a tester at Ubisoft. "We write about a bug - they ignore us"

[@chazzerous]

I don’t know how you fix this without overhauling the whole thing. The bugs and design flaws are totally endemic. Like, a huge complaint for the game is insta-fail stealth sections. The maps are designed in a way that you are forced to basically crawl through massive open sections with lots of enemies. Sure, you can make insta-fail states go away. But then the challenge goes away entirely since then the only problem you’re then dealing with is time. There was a major patch about a month ago where they made the enemy AI more reactive to Nix’ sabotage - which helped the stealth parts, but they didn’t do much for combat so now I’m just dealing with bullshit shooting mechanics AND they took away some exploits that made stealth janky but fun.

[@BlueBD]

The Very bones of the game is garbage. it would built on literal trash. If Their idea to "Fix" it is to polish to top layer it will do nothing. The game is rotten to the core and the only "Fix" is to throw it out and start again.

[@JohnSmith-sl6uq]

Cyberpunk got a new director after launch, who led 2.0 and phantom liberty, and is now leading the sequel and building out the new team in boston Edit: clarifying that Ubisoft is incomparable to CDPR when it comes to quality

[@CZJames20]

Yea but that´s very rare and the skeleton of Cyberpunk was always very strong, that´s not the case with Outlaws.

[@Lucasio1209]

This shouldn’t be an issue after cyberpunk. This should never happen again, I’m so sick of this.

[@JohnSmith-sl6uq]

@@CZJames20 agreed

[@CZJames20]

@@Lucasio1209 Agreed but studios will never learn.

[@ravenshrike]

Cyberpunk also dumped last gen systems, and therefore slow HDDs, which allowed them to come much closer to their original promises and significantly reduced the amount of bugs across the board.

[@Rellelol]

I cant see anyone coming back to play this no matter what they do. Way too little and way too late.

[@minbari73]

After my save/game broke at the 11th hour of completion, i did indeed start a new game after the first couple of patches and managed to complete the game. It was an enjoyable experience marred by the initial early access bugs and game breaking crap. The second playthrough had none of that nonsense. All of this though is indeed too little too late.

[@bryguytyguy]

They should have given you the option to create your own "outlaw". Like Cyberpunk. That would have given them a chance

[@Regna]

100% would have bought it if I could have made my own character.

[@EasterlySumo868]

Cyberpunk is garbage. It’s still broken and buggy. I hate peiple think it’s good. And a paid dlc was bs. They should have gave it away for free since anybody was willing to give that turd another chance

[@SmokersTars]

​@EasterlySumo868 what reality do you live in? Or do you by chance play it on a ps4?

[@EasterlySumo868]

@ I have a series X and PS five. I literally watch a few cars that are on the road disappear.

[@EasterlySumo868]

@ and walking into a store remove your cops. Like gta 3 did that better. 😭

[@kieran5476]

Game releases: buggy The higher ups: "We'll fix it post launch" A tale as old as time...

[@THEONETRUEOVERLORD]

I wish it had a honor system and different ending like RDR2. They already have a reputation thing why not go all the way.

[@hardin_of_astora]

The bug fixing in Ubi games is as follows: players report a bug -> bug is reported -> bug is "under investigation" for 6-12 months -> bug gets eventually fixed (but not all of them). Hence, buy Ubi games after 1 year after release when it is also on a big discount. I remember Valhalla had bugs that were reported like 1 year ago and they still weren't fixed

[@extreme244]

Can’t wait to play it feature complete for free or 90% off in 2 years ❤️

[@MisterMonsterMan]

Unless Kay Vess suddenly turns into a young Han Solo this game has no chance of going anywhere.

[@acev3521]

I don’t mind playing as a girl but they need rewrite the whole story

[@starscream6629]

Would prefer they have create a scoundrel player creator at the start.

[@Disciple550]

@@acev3521she’s boring as hell. They need to have a new outlaw to play every season. Lando, Dash Rendar, Hondo, ect. Every character has their own ship and gun and brief storyline and maybe a new planet per season

[@stanley13579]

The people who always wanted to buy this game have already bought it. The people who are waiting for a deep sale will wait for a deep sale. The people who don't want this game won't buy it. "Improving" the game does.... what, exactly? Are the people who already have it going to buy it again?

[@DubberRucks]

Yeah, and are those that have no interest in it going to change their minds and buy it?? 🤔

[@THETWUAN-r3u]

It will be interesting to see the numbers

[@Youre-Welcome]

If it comes out on game pass, I might play it.

[@gtanusetiawan]

If it’s that bad I prob wouldn’t get it even on a deep sale lol But if it’s kinda okay then I prob would.

[@brianodonnell2929]

I'm waiting for it to come to steam before picking it up, so I'm pretty pleased that they're fixing it now

[@isaacchillman11]

Promises promises promises

[@denkusprime8969]

Knowinggg you can't keeeeeeeeeeeep

[@DubberRucks]

Todd Howard level of promises this is. Maybe.

[@Ace56723]

No developer will ever get a kudos from me for fixing their game after launch, it shouldn’t have launched like that period.

[@minbari73]

Sean Murray has a single tear rolling down his cheek.

[@sirab3ee198]

Ubisoft defined stealth with its splinter cell franchise and now they are incapable of doing a decent job at it... Crazy!!!

[@minbari73]

Splinter Cell stealth is very overrated and it's fans look at it with rose-tinted glasses.

[@sirab3ee198]

@minbari73 not sure what you are talking about here, the first splinter cell game came out in 2002. It was one of of not the best PC stealth game out there. Ubisoft where at the top of their game with rainbow six and splinter cell. Please elaborate the amazing stealth games that you played pre 2002 that were not Metal Gear Solid or Thief which were great but very basic.

[@minbari73]

@@sirab3ee198 Hence my comment mentioning 'rose tinted glasses'. Ducking behind things, following the best route, staying out of line of sight were apparently ground breaking for the day. Playing them now, unless you have a channel dedicated to playing old games where you duck behind things, follow the best route and stay out of line of sight, they seem old hat and limited. I'd rather play something with infinite ways of approach and choice..such as Breakpoint. LOL, even the Splinter Cell missions in that game limited the player.

[@sirab3ee198]

@minbari73 breakpoint ???!!! Is the most dumb down Ubisoft slop of a game ever... Open world slop :))) ... Ghost recon Advanced Warfighter 1 and 2 are 100x better than that slop of a game. Also my comment stated that Ubisoft helped define the stealth genre 22 years ago!!! Saying that breakpoint slop is better than Splinter Cell tells me what I need to know about you...

[@65firered]

Ubisoft doesn't understand what makes games good and why people play them, they think they can just say whatever they want and release a product and get money automatically.

[@Veteran_Nerd]

What a colossal waste of resources/money

[@kibathefang6022]

Haven't bought this yet, waiting for Steam. However if I were to fix one thing in this game, let us keep more weapons. It's a simple thing to add, though it would impact the gameplay a lot and missions would need to be reworked to adjust to us having more weapons that we can hold. But if anything, having more weapons is more realistic than just a blaster and lootinf weapons that you can't even keep.

[@modernmobster]

The problems with this game are down to its very core. You cant fix it, Ubisoft.

[@z1DEv_ag]

If a game can take 4 years to make badly, and a few months to fix, the devs never understood gaming in the begining, and wre so deluded about thier stupidity, it took complete failure and enourmous negative feedback to realise the basic mistakes they made, apart from having millions of dollars to make it look passable graphically and sound-wise, so that it would be presentable for sale on some level at all.

[@TobyRawal]

Delaying AC was a good move. I wonder if they’d done the same with SW: Outlaws and released it in November (in place of when AC should have released) with all these ‘new’ features that the game may have actually stood somewhat of a chance.

[@kukuricapica]

To be honest, this is exactly the change in management that Ubisoft needed. I trully believe that The Ubisoft board had emergency meeting after their stocks fell and reviewed their processes pipelines. From experience I know that something like that probably had taken place and result of this is that they have found flaw in either QA testing or in some middle management, but the result is that Ubisoft is now going to basically wont realease the game until it's finished, because now that investors lost millions of dollars it's actually in their own interest not to rush developers and realease pipelines. I'm pretty fcking sure that QA communicated these issues about their games but they were either ignored or something else had priority. It's baffling that game developers with arguably one of the best engines out there can't make consistend cutscenes or A.I. I really hope they will fix the game because i would love to play it some day in a state it was meant to be played. P.S.: I feel like that almost any modern game nowadays should pick a realease date and then arbitrary just add another year or year and half to it, because clearly there is simply not enough talent in these studios to finish the game. I mean 4 year production cycle for a "new ip"/new game that is not a sequel is too short.

[@intothevoid2046]

My biggest issue with the stealth gameplay is not the AI but the fact that you can do stupid stealth takedowns but are not allowed to hide the body despite the fact that enemies react to it. This is such a mindblowingly silly oversight, that in fact dwarfs the AI issue completely. They have two seasonal expansions coming I thing they want to make up for the base game with that. I hope they do.

[@JBMorris9]

0:12 You can’t have Kratos dancing like that!! That’s almost heresy!!!! 😂😂😂

[@atonofspiders]

Thanks for pointing that out 😂

[@Jr_TopG]

I think the reason Ubisoft have the time to put so much effort into fixing Outlaws is because Ac Shadows got delayed and they need something to promote for the holiday season

[@timallanmusic]

The AI was different when I played. Some missions I got so frustrated for being caught so easily. I'm not sure if they had patched it by release, but the lack of checkpoints on missions or save options, on top of being seen so easy really got to me

[@XionSteel]

Companies just needs to stop taking the cyberpunk77 approach to game making, aka releasing it in a broken state and then fixing it later. I get that bugs are an inevitability when you have thousands, maybe tens of thousands, up to maybe a million players playing it then something will be eventually found along the way. im talking more game breaking bugs that should have been caught in a AAA environment. I don't want to think their Q&A team is that incompetent that they completely missed the AI being so bad for instance.

[@andreasplosky8516]

UBI can be criticized for all kinds of things, but they are very good at extensively supporting their games. The Wildlands games are proof of that. If they succeed in addressing the major problems, then I might eventually buy Outlaws.

[@minbari73]

Having played both of the last Ghost Recon games to death, i agree their support was fantastic, particularly with Breakpoint and the free Motherland DLC, which they didn't have to do at all. Outlaws as it is now has it's major problems fixed already. My only complaint is, that it isn't at all as big as those games you mentioned, nor will it ever be. The Star Wars IP limits it more ways than "what ubi wants to do".

[@65firered]

If.

[@andreasplosky8516]

@@65firered Yes, most definitely... IF. A big IF.

[@bascalbo]

ubisofts (or really any video games) stealth peaked almost 20 years ago with splinter cell chaos theory :( bring it baaaack

[@Notivarg]

The ship has sailed and subsequently sunk. It's like talking about fixing the Titanic. You technically can do it, but the cost would far exceed making a new ship/game.

[@ArawnDan]

If you steal a cookie and then apologize, you don't get a cookie as a reward. Plus this apology came AFTER the spanking.

[@N0thing2SeaHere]

They don't *want* to fix it. They want people to *buy* it, so they *have* to fix it.

[@Reven338]

They can fix the scaffolding all they like, but if the foundations are flawed, then they need to scrap it and start again.

[@nathan187dogg]

I’m now worried about The Division 3 !!

[@cleverchimp499]

Star Wars Battlefront 2 numbers are probably higher than Outlaws. I still enjoy playing Battlefront 2 CO OP it's so much fun.

[@konradzukowski213]

Ubisoft in their attempt to fix Outlaws just confirms what a large portion of gamers already think: There's no point in buying Ubisoft games on release since they still have to fix them after release.

[@65firered]

You know, if you actually focused on making a good product and put your money into making it good over marketing, you wouldn't be trying to fix it after release. If you couldn't follow through on your promises before release then we don't expect you to afterwards. Ubisoft better learn that customers aren't deposit boxes, Ubisoft isn't entitled to our money.

[@JaiOnline]

Damn, we're getting Star Wars: Outlaws Re:Outlawed Enhanced Edition next year.

[@christopherr.561]

They don’t even understand the question how does anyone think they can find the right answer.

[@Jr_TopG]

Imagine if Outlaws was juat releasing November 21st in this finished state

[@dryden28]

The guy who failed at a project is given another project, awesome management decision making.

[@wmanstudio]

They will fix it like Bethesda fixed Starfield :>>>

[@aaronstout9087]

I can't wait to play this game again when the update comes out.

[@demonwolf5553]

How to fix outlaws. 1. Fix the price 2. Remove battle passes and shit for a single player game 3. Remove the horrible ass AI 4. Add some OUTLAWING shit. 5. Work on the Mc face. Because its so inconsistent somehow 6. These are the only things they can correct, otherwise they would wanna redo the whole game and ubisoft would be ded by then.

[@bruvkek4629]

so gameplay wasn't fine as journalists and reddit proclaimed? interesting

[@megamandrn001]

To quote the great philosophers TMBG, can't shake the devil's hand and say you're only kidding Ubisoft.

[@DABranche]

This is what happens when you give No Man's Sky and Cyberpunk a second chance. Publishers see this and think they can get away with fixing shit later. Nonsense like this is why $70 games are a joke to me.

[@Youre-Welcome]

I never had significant issues with Cyberpunk. Still don't know why people shit their pants...unless they had a PS4 or Xbox One, thinking it was ever going to run 😂

[@tbone2646]

​@Youre-Welcome those console guys have no concept of hardware limitations or graphical options - the game is just the game and the magic box either runs it or it doesn't

[@Austin-sw3mf]

Good on Ubisoft for fixing the game. A lot of people were making this out to be a turd, but it's the definition of a 6-7/10. There were a lot of cool bits in here that got hidden by the jank and culture war bs.

[@kurosumomo]

It's nice they are going to fix the game, but is it really worth it, people who wanted the game already bought it. They might get people who were on the fence. Well at least a new playthrough in 5-10 years will be better if nothing else. But my opinion is, it's financially not feasible to "fix" single player games months after release, if this was done a week or two after release, with an obvious schedule on when and what they will fix, sure, but this wont materialize until somewhere next year, at that point the game will be forgotten.

[@kaleiohulee6693]

How much damage does a brand need to take before it's put down? Too many get to survive in a zombie state as players wait for them to figure themselves out. They're taking up space and support that could be given to other growing studios that actually deliver.

[@danteyoda]

How are they going to fix something that's fundamentally broken at game level..

[@NotPareidolia]

They aren't making "good moves" they're simply "desperate". If they wanted to do a good move they would've fix their shit BEFORE launch and put it on steam with steam achievements on there day one. This shouldn't be redeemable coming from them and nobody should let it slide. That's the only way they'll learn.

[@ExitonD]

Yes, they'll just quickly remake it from the ground up. I imagine it's easily done. :)

[@Asoeee]

Well, you clearly have low expectations for games... the game was supposed to be about OUTLAW, do you know what that means? and you can be anything but that. BECAUSE YOU CAN'T BE EVIL, you play something that resembles a woman, and they didn't even add the Nar Shadda or Hutta plants that are the center of this criminal world... Well, but for some people a nice sweet companion and petting animals is enough then you feel like a real outlaw, get out of here

[@LoneReaper019]

Love modern game concepts Before we had beta access which was almost always free to hop in and try the game to let the devs know what the issues were to be fixed.... ....Now, we pay them for the Beta version of the game at full price and hope they fix the issues at some point.

[@max3334441]

If there is 50% discount and massive improvements, this game can be considered

[@shamanahaboolist]

The only way I'll buy another Ubisoft game is if I find out every single executive has been fired with no bonus or severance package.

[@70mavgr]

I do not believe that there is enough interest in this game for any fixes to have an impact on sales. Most people have already forgotten it.

[@Vanu-i4o]

The problems with the game are so fundamental that it cannot be fixed, it didn't fail just because the main character is ugly.

[@Onedepressedgamer]

You do realize you can’t save a product that failed upon release by promising to fix that is not how a good business work

[@yourvenparianen5390]

Its the most horrible way to go about it.... Trying to fix a game after its set in stone is crazy. Theres just too many systems at their core that needs overhaul and a whole new direction. They should do what sony does and just shitcan all the failures...cut costs and refocus on actual good games

[@NosyNorseman]

Yep they thought that Star Wars IP would sell even a shitty buggy game… did not and now..hmm we probably have to improve this shit and try to sell it again on steam..unbelievable they shipped this out with that AI and stealth gameplay.

[@Novk010]

lol people have already made up their minds about this game. It’s been written off as bad. If they thing things will change they’re wrong. Example: Diablo 4

[@zeyosin1771]

They released the game like this, I really don't think they care about fixing anything...they just want to pretend in hopes of some dummies picking this up. You can't flip crappy game mechanics IN 4 MONTHS. Stealth/combat is so far away from what this was suppose to be. Remember when the planet size was the biggest concern?

[@GiovanniLucatello]

The real problem with this game is facial animation. For the rest, I really enjoyed it. You can feel the Star Wars aroma!

[@SITHRooTs]

People have quite simply had enough of Ubislop. When did they think it was OK to constantly release buggy scrappy games and think gamers were just going to keep accepting this tripe.

[@levelbasegaming5740]

We really liked Star Wars Outlaws. The Reputation system was the best part....wait why are we BANNED all of a sudden?

[@hendricksausges3006]

It's disgusting that we accept this. They sell an unfinished product and we're supposed to swallow it. I hope they never get the chance and then they go out of business before improving anything.

[@sandervr10]

And this is why we don't pre-order and buy day one ... But sometime down the line when all updates are done....

[@bilson7523]

I don't know if its fixable. Every game system is compromised. What are they going to do? Completely overhaul the faction system, combat, AI, and update the maps pist launch?

[@elcry1920]

"each and every time you do it, more damage is done to the brand". Bethesda disapproves.

[@Loke6661666246]

They also need to let players to turn off all post processing effects. It's such a muddy mess

[@thewinterwoods]

I really liked this game actually. It's a bit frustrating, but i'm having a lot of fun with it anyway.

[@chef541]

That's good for the five people still playing

[@Dreggy990]

Really saw comments in other videos of people saying it dont even need tk be fix it was already good

[@Thedownliner2015]

Honestly how could you fix this game by doing anything other than recalling it and chucking the whole idea into the bin?

[@k4yser]

The issues with the game aren't solely due to performance issues, or bugs..

[@Srrch]

They need to remove the one punching someone in the helmet knockout.

[@shawnmurphy173]

I really hope Ubisoft gets it together

[@Crazy09starkillor]

I think people also not putting enough blame on Disney as well with their kid shit rules, it's star WARS ffs, and it's a game about CRIME

[@brunorocha1328]

I hope they fix it. Now with a fair price and without 3k bugs I may buy it. Thanks Ubisoft, your leadership is awful.

[@ThatBlindGuy247]

Honestly if it wasn't a Star Wars game it'd get way less hate. I'm liking it but i'm not blind to issues like the takedowns having no weight to them. Haven't experienced many bugs. Faces have 0 emotions

[@khdmhd2947]

Fixing that jaw line and making her look like an actual woman would be a good start.

[@Broery980]

Pricing a broken game for up to $130... What a company.

[@thexisback4441]

My take is release the fix, then a week later release on steam. Give your audience confidence to buy.

[@that80ssongyoulove84]

My wallet has blacklisted Ubisoft. There is a threshold for the number of chances you can give a company that it comes to a point where one feels like an idiot and sucker for continuing to buy or recommend their products. For me personally, they have surpassed that threshold. I hope they can figure it out for the sake of employees keeping their jobs, but I stopped caring about what Ubisoft does or says they're going to do.

[@cleverchimp499]

If they fix Outlaws I will play it because I'm a Star Wars fan so will definitely be keeping a eye on it's developments.

[@startthebengine]

My biggest issue with Outlaws is it wasn’t cancelled before it came out.

[@aroyals339]

God I hope they don't fix it. The amount of joy I've gotten out of youtubers playing this and laughing at all of the crazy and stupid stuff is way more than I would have gotten if it was just a normal game. In no other game can you throw a grenade in a room and have the AI say "it was probably nothing."

[@Alpha___00]

OK, first order of day - give protagonist stun baton or something. Stealth takedowns are ridiculous.

[@ShootEvrythg]

Outlaw's problem is much bigger than the content. It's the premise - it's boring. It has an inconsequential character in an inconsequential conflict. Star Wars should be about star wars - grand galactic conflicts. It's in the name.

[@huskytzu7709]

Ubisoft is great at not taking the L and refuse to admit that their games fundamentally are boring lol

[@Tini-Stic]

I think it'd be hard to fix a burning pile of ash.