Starfleet's Dishonorable Justification for the Titan

[@InJeffable]

To honor a man who GAVE HIS LIFE to save the Federation, I think that if the Titan was going to be rechristened at all, it should have been named the USS Shaw.

[@cBake0]

Hell yeah, the rechristening felt more forced than anything else in the season and I could have lived without it, as the Titan deserved a legacy of it's own if not becoming the Shaw

[@BlazingOwnager]

@@cBake0 You're missing the reason this happened. Clearly the show runner was making a last minute backdoor pilot to try to make a decent future Star Trek show and figured giving it The Enterprise name would stoke way more fan expectation than anything else. I can accept it purely on meta business reasons as a result.

[@cBake0]

@@BlazingOwnager oh I'm not missing the reason, I just detest the choice when it could have been it's own ship. The main vessel doesn't have to be the Enterprise to be successful and this choice doesn't feel great in a storytelling sense.

[@cBake0]

@@BlazingOwnager I mean honestly a refit D would have been a better candidate imo for any Enterprise G

[@KingPoseidon02]

Normally that is how militaries do around the world, is rechristen to the name of a war hero.

[@entropy11]

Liam Shaw having reached warpscale rotation velocity upon hearing they renamed his ship in honor of those pirates.

[@atoll8423]

He should know better than to challenge Dad Savage

[@unimatrix_zero]

I absolutely agree with you. Renaming the Titan-A to Enterprise-G was a dishonor for both ship's legacies.

[@jimmyd102000]

I agree with this. The Titan must have distinguished itself enough on its own to even get the Titan-A designation in the first place. That's been shown to be very rare. Rechristening the Titan-A to Enterprise-G diminishes both, especially the Titan's legacy, which it now ended.

[@augurseer]

Agreed

[@TheErockaustin]

This was the one nostalgia-grab I could have done without. The ship was the Titan when it performed those feats... it feels like cheap appropriation to rename it the Enterprise. Plus confusing as hell to retell the story of this battle, where the Enterprise was destroyed by the Borg while at the same time, another Enterprise that could cloak ferried a renegade crew, which then had to abandon the Enterprise to go get another Enterprise out of a museum.

[@time391]

Reminder Star Trek IV, the Enterprise-A was renamed after the whale incident...I mean Kirk and co. deserved a new ship after saving the Earth from Whale watcher aliens, so 120 years later Picard and co did the same thing.

[@elonwong]

as the pakleds said: another enterprise!

[@JohanSmalls]

Disagree. The Enterpsie A was the Yorktown before and the decision was made for the very same reasons. A newly built Enterprise A would have had to compete with the Excelsior, which had already been presented as the humungus state of the art big powerful ship. I twould have been childish to present an "even bigger ship" ... so they decided that "name means everything" ... very likewise an Enterprise G would have had to be even bigger than the F.... which would have been ridiculous.

[@TheErockaustin]

@@time391 I don't recall the Enterprise-A having another name first though. It was commissioned and decommissioned as the Enterprise.

[@generalilbis]

​@@TheErockaustin While it has never been stated in movie or TV episode dialogue, common beta canon from different reference guides and other supplemental material has the Enterprise-A start off as either the USS Yorktown (a nod to what Roddenberry originally was going to call the hero ship in TOS, before changing it to Enterprise) or the USS Ti-Ho and recommissioned as the Enterprise-A. Mainly because there wasn't enough of a gap between the loss of the prime Enterprise and the reveal of the Enterprise-A to have built it from scratch...and the fact that the Constitution II/Refit Constitution design was the end of its useful life, so its doubtful Starfleet would make any more when Excelsior-class vessels were coming onto the scene. So...logic seems to hold the A was an existing Constitution II that was renamed while being repaired or refit.

[@JefferyAClark]

The USS Sao Paulo was a brand new ship. It didn't have a service record other than the trip from Utopia Planitia to DS9.

[@DarkLordDiablos]

That fact seems to have been forgotten about in order to make his point more valid. That and the fact the rename was done to honour the USS Defiant and her crew for their heroics against the Dominion. Also it saved a completely pointless scene between Sisko, Ross and other Admirals over them giving Sisko another different class of ship as a replacement and ultimately agreeing at the end to giving him another Defiant considering he helped with it's design to begin with.

[@seasidescott]

And it was very much pointed out that it was a very rare thing along with what both of you said.

[@trekker683]

I have a slightly more optimistic lore theory. Riker has a meeting with the current CNC and tell him that he will be ready to take command again after his vacation. He asks for the Titan. The CNC tells him that they just officially gave the Titan to 7of9 and that she more than earned it. Then the CNC offers Riker the new enterprise under construction. Then Riker suggests swapping the names. Give the new flag ship the name of the ship that stood between the assimilated and earth. And honor the ship and crew with the most famous name in the federation.

[@KingreX32]

Agreed. Enterprise-G should have been a new ship.

[@hexagonal_nexul]

you should search up something called an eclipse class lol

[@pyronuke4768]

Honestly, while watching the finale something about the Enterprise-F just felt off. I honestly believe it was supposed to be the -E that was being decommissioned so they could make the Titan-A the -F, but then they shoehorned STO's Odyssey-class Enterprise in at the last minute for (say it with me) fan bait. For something some fans were clamoring to be canonized for over a decade, their inclusion of the -F just felt so hollow.

[@thanqualthehighseer]

the only in universe reason i can think of is the newer ships had to be gutted to remove any way to remotely hack them and disconnect from the fleet system. the Titan being a older ship it was easier and faster and a ship named Titan did fire and destroy/cripple several ships in full view of Earth killing hundreds if not a few thousand young crewmembers. the name itself may have become poltically infamous enough to be temporally retired.

[@tm502010]

And a larger, higher end ship. A genuine flagship grade ship…

[@Padge112]

​@@tm502010 isn't it a constellation redesign. You know like Enterprise 1701 and A.

[@GameHammerCG]

Narratively speaking, the reveal should have been a revamped Titan-A and, behind it (Star Trek IV style) a USS Picard.

[@RobertJohnstonrobjomabri]

i'd have enjoyed seeing a shot of Geordi and his daughters fussing over bluprints for a new type of vessel, the Picard -class, with the next Enterprise being of that lot

[@CrackedCandy]

I honestly yelled out The Picard! I thought they had named a ship that. That would have been great.

[@entropy11]

And yes it's definitely a starfleet thing to do, just like networking all their ships even though they know that their most dangerous enemy is really really good at taking over networks.

[@GlamorousTitanic21]

Yeah. The Colonials learned that the hard way.

[@808INFantry11X]

The one thing that bugs me about this they have first hand knowledge on multiple occasions the M5 computer fiasco, even in New Trek Prodigy and lower decks have both big costly example of why this was just a bad idea but they continuously double down on it.

[@entropy11]

@@808INFantry11X The answer is always "Some dumbass admiral"

[@xyrelium]

changeling infiltration could've had a hand in that

[@pyronuke4768]

Yeah, it wasn't like there were incidents like the M5 or Texas-class that could've alerted them to how bad an idea it was...

[@DarthAzabrush]

Also "retrofitting" the Titan's components into a ship of a new class seemed to me to be Paramount's excuse for not paying the designer of the Luna Class properly.

[@jimskywaker4345]

they used the Luna Class in lower decks though

[@DarkLordDiablos]

​@@jimskywaker4345 what you are forgetting is that Lower Decks is a animated show that isn't exactly highly detailed meaning the Luna class in the show wasn't as highly detailed as the actual design which Paramount's lawyers could use as a argument should it goto court.

[@TerLoki]

Which is all HIGHLY ironic given that the Constitution III-class is quite literally an updated fan ship (the Shangri-La-class) brought from the era of the first six movies up to the 25th century, the main difference is that this time the designer had been hired on as part of the crew (he helped make some of the new ships and models for the Stargazer's ready room in season 2) not just someone who submitted a design. And I'll bet you anything this is yet another reason why the Titan-A became the Enterprise-G when we already had the Enterprise-F in all her glory FINALLY come to life onscreen: The Odyssey-class was a fan design from STO's "design the next Enterprise" contest. As someone who's spent way too much time zooming around space saving the galaxy in an Odyssey-class, THAT is flagship material and deserves way more than just a cameo. Stupid legal crap ruins everything.

[@DarkLordDiablos]

@@TerLoki Legal crap always ruins everything as it always seems to favour those with the most money. What's funny about this is I'm pretty sure the same guy designed both the Odyssey and the Luna classes. That guy being Sean Tourangeau.

[@TerLoki]

@@DarkLordDiablos Nah, the Odyssey was made by Adam Ihle.

[@captainobvious9233]

It's supposed to be bad luck to change a name of a ship. "Legend says that when every ship is christened, its name goes into a 'Ledger of the deep' maintained by Neptune (or Poseidon) himself. Renaming a ship or boat means you are trying to slip something past the gods and you will be punished for your deviousness."

[@filthycasual8187]

To be fair, that only applies to seafaring vessels. The NCC-1701 lineage operates in outer space.

[@CrackedCandy]

I thought the same thing.

[@rga0019]

Probably why Q introduced himself to Jack at the end

[@JimmyNotes]

If I remember correctly, when Picard was telling Riker that he should make a stand and try to fight the shrike, Riker tells Picard "This isn't the Enterprise."

[@sydniusalminia5364]

I dont think Matalis anticipated the Titan and Shaw to be received so well. I think he was focused on enterprise nostalgia to the point he didnt realize he had created something new thay also deserved respect

[@Nalehw]

I think you've hit the nail on the head there. At the time he was writing, nobody was asking for a Titan-A show. But people are always asking "what's the current Enterprise up to?" and I think that's the question that he was trying to answer. He said in an AMA that the show was written from the start as an Enterprise-G origin story. And then we got our hands on it, and a lot of us got really excited about Shaw and the Titan-A, but obviously by the time it's airing it's too late to change the ending.

[@mckayfan]

I have said in other places that they did not expect Shaw to become so popular and I do wonder if the regret killing him off.

[@spartan078ben]

I would argue the renaming of the Sau Paulo was because it just came out of the shipyard, and Ross just picked a random Defiant-class ship to rename. Also, you will notice that the original had the NX prefix. I think the rename had NCC meaning it was no longer experimental.

[@VikCachat]

The reason it didn't get an -A designation is time and budget to alter the models and reshoot stock footage, and the remaining episodes have shots with the NX registry on the new vessel.

[@hardwing]

You are right for all these reasons! Hell, I wouldn't have minded if the Enterprise D would have been refittet(All Good Things-style) and returned to service, at least until Enterprise G was ready. Starfleet would have been short of ships at this point and I once read the Galaxy Class was supposed to be in service for a long time. This would have been fanservice done right.

[@jsullivan649]

Them changing it to the new enterprise didn’t make sense to me. The enterprise line all followed in a way in terms of look, the Titan just looks odd, especially after you see what the F looks like and then it shrinks massively for the G? My only take on defiance and sap Paolo was that they were identical hulls… not entirely changed ones

[@entropy11]

Defiance and Sao Paolo was purely a propaganda move, Defiance was the face of the Dominion war for Starfleet, and it was probably the right move under the circumstances.

[@g.c.brooks7214]

I can't remember if it was discussed onscreen, but I was under the impression the Sao Paulo was a newly built Defiant class ship and Starfleet gave Sisko special permission to change the name to Defiant. It was a PR move but also a nod to Sisko & his crew as well as the original Defiant class prototype that he helped build. I think in this case the name change works where the Titan-A rebrand to Enterprise-G doesn't.

[@Wrijvingsloos]

Well it is a neo constitution class ship. So that seems at least a bit fitting

[@alanmike6883]

Captain Shaw was the most human of them all

[@pauldoser9873]

Agree 100%. I wish the show would have ended with Seven getting the Titan-A with her and Sydney flying past the new Enterprise-G in a shuttle. Shoot it like when Kirk and co. flew past Excelsior at the end of Star Trek IV. Then during the poker game, make a comment about Riker returning to the fleet because he couldn't turn down command of the Enterprise.

[@lucemiserlohn]

My problem with this lies in the ship itself and its capabilities. The Titan A just isn't flagship material, and the Enterprise is the flagship and always has been the flagship, the posting in the fleet with the most prestige possible. Making the Titan A lazily into the Enterprise G is doing a name to that prestige and standing, the heroics of the Titan and her crew notwithstanding. Someone else has mentioned the better option: Renaming the Titan A into the U.S.S. Jean-Luc Picard would have made much more sense; if unconfortable with naming ships after living people (which real-life militaries actually do on a regular basis), it could be named the U.S.S. La Barre as a placeholder, and renamed after Jean-Luc died (a second time? how many is that now?).

[@matthewcaughey8898]

Can’t agree more. The enterprise is always meant to be the farthest out there and be the standard bearer for Starfleet. The message is this is what joining the federation can bring you. And this is the price for being out enemy. As the Flagship of Starfleet the USS Enterprise is supposed to be the best foot forward and represent the best humanity has to offer

[@kaicreech7336]

Honestly I'm sick of the enterprise-b flagship material. I want a small exploration vessel, like the good old days

[@thanqualthehighseer]

@esphaeraspraestans4212 the NX-01 was the only functional ship for a time and became the flagship the TOS was a bit more grey area with the Enterprise, Excalibur, Hood and a few others holding the title for a time the Excelsior was the flagship and later maybe the Enterprise B when the Excelsior was in for refit. the Enterprise -C was a Ambassador class, the most powerful class at the time so likely at some point. the Enterprise -D was stated as the flagship of the federation on screen the Enterprise- E led ships during the dominion war so counts as a flagship the Enterprise-F had a Admiral leading the fleet so is classed as a flagship

[@JMO_1976]

You guys are confusing flagship & how advanced a ship is. They don't have to be one in the same. For example, in WWII, the battleship South Dakota was Admiral Nimitz's flagship, even though it wasn't as large or advanced as battleships like the Missouri class.

[@DrForrester87]

@@thanqualthehighseer The Enterprise D is the only ship confirmed to be the Flagship of the Federation. Being the only one doesn't mean anything and being powerful doesn't either. Nor does the presence of Admiralty especially since Starfleet doesn't seem to have any sub-organization to their fleet unless there's an emergency. So, in S2 for instance when the Jurati Borg show up, the Stargazer would have been the "flagship" of that smaller fleet because Picard was onboard and had seniority. But he wasn't in command of the entirety of Starfleet.

[@michaeldemarco9950]

Given the number of Defiant-class vessels during the Dominion War (not many), the São Paulo may have been a brand new ship.

[@jono_cc2258]

Been a while since I’ve watched the latter part of DS9 season 7 but I just assumed it was a new ship basically fresh out of the shipyard.

[@thanqualthehighseer]

the Enterprise-E was being built as the USS Honorius before the D was destroyed and renamed

[@DarkLordDiablos]

​@@jono_cc2258 it was fresh off the line and then given special dispensation to be renamed after the destruction of the original Defiant.

[@BNuts]

Shaw was my favourite new character introduced in _STP_ , and I didn't even watch the show, just clips. That said, the _Titan_ had its own legacy 3 ships deep (that we know of), and renaming her _Enterprise_ spat on the legacies of both vessels _and_ their crews. They could have had the _Titan-A_ (because for whatever reason they decided they need to replace the Luna-class _Titan_ (which should really by the _Titan-A_ making the _Titan-A_ the _Titan-B_ , I know it's confusing) refit to serve as a multi-mission starship, the way the _Enterprise_ has always been a multi-mission platform, and made her the new flagship of a recovering Starfleet. It's also possible to have a Starfleet without an _Enterprise_ for awhile, if they absolutely had to retire the Odyssey-class. And given she only appears for very short glimpses in two episodes outside of _Star Trek Online_ , and without the proper bridge at that, I think it's a real shame of a missed opportunity with Adam's design. If they absolutely needed a new _Enterprise_ , I think they could have grabbed another ship design to do it with. Another _STO_ crossover, like the Yamato Dreadnought might have been funny, given it's based on the Galaxy-X from 'All Good Things.' It could have also been a Yorktown Odyssey variant, a Vesta, or something completely different-looking. Just... not the _Titan_ . In previous cases where Starfleet has renamed a vessel, there's no mention of that vessel's accomplishments, nor really what happened to her crew, and I'm generally more curious as to the latter than the former. They have to be sent somewhere, after all. In _STO_ , Admiral Jorel Quinn makes a point that Starfleet has more ships than capable crew, and it's unusual, but they'll most likely have to essentially fast-track the Player Character's career. This partially explains how you can go from a newly-graduated Cadet to a Fleet Admiral in about two years, whereas in-universe, far fewer officers make Admiral. It also explains how you're encourage to switch shifts every 10 levels, unless you have a T6 ship tucked away for your use, in which case it scales with your level, so you don't have to change ships. But you also generally keep your crew. Apart from the _Titan-A_ we don't really see a ship whose actions we have witnessed get their names or registries changed, and usually the change _is_ for an _Enterprise_ : The _Yorktown_ into the _A_ , the _Sovereign_ into the _E_ . _Sao Paolo_ into the _Defiant_ really is an exception, since the Admiralty saw the affect the legendary ship had on fleet morale. They specifically granted Ben Sisko special dispensation not only to rename _Sao Paolo_ as the _Defiant_ , but to keep the original registration number, so as to pretend the original _Defiant_ had not been defeated by the Breen weapon, or something similar, considering the changes to the interior by comparison. In this case, the crew of the _Sao Paolo_ could have even felt honoured to play a part in the legend of Sisko and the _Defiant_ . We don't know, because there is no reference to it. Just like there's no reference to the service records of the Connie Refit _Yorktown_ or the _Sovereign_ . We can assume _Sao Paolo_ was active in the Dominion War, but serving elsewhere, because why wouldn't she be, unless, of course, she was new off the line. In which case, she had no legacy. The one that still puzzles me is _Discovery_ . She was given a refit and an _A_ , but wasn't she still the same ship?

[@DragoonMS]

The Discovery thing was a (rather goofy) effort to keep hidden the truth about the ship and crew being from the 23rd century. Like ANYBODY was really gonna be wondering where another Federation ship came from. 😆😆🤣🤣 Starfleet CAN do without an Enterprise for awhile; there was apparently around a 20 year gap between the Enterprise-C's destruction and the Enterprise-D's launch. Two whole decades...I don't think that there was any gap that long in the Enterprise's history...unless we find out how long it was between the end of the NX-01's service (since the Fleet Museum had the NX-01 Refit) and the initial Constitution class design that had Captain Robert April in command. 🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️ And I have to agree, the Constitution III class iteration absosmurfinlutely should've been the Titan-B, with the Titan-A being another Luna class. But meanwhile...is it just me, or does the Connie III kinda suck?? Maybe not Enterprise-A levels (nothing's been THAT bad since), but the Titan-A seemed to get whooped nearly every episode until it finally got some plot armor.

[@BNuts]

@@DragoonMS Cue every _Trek_ ship getting introduced just in time to get its teeth unceremoniously kicked in.

[@DragoonMS]

@@BNuts That's sorta true. But the worst the Excelsior got was its transwarp drive sabotaged.

[@michaelpapp5518]

I was mad. At first. However, I realized I would be fine with them deciding to rename the ship USS Picard. I didn’t actually mind them changing the name as much as I thought I did. From the Federation’s point of view, making the Titan A Enterprise G is a high honor. There’s gonna be a Titan B eventually. So, why not? I’m happy about Captain Seven of the USS Enterprise. I think that’s just cool.

[@DarkLordDiablos]

You can also imagine there would be alot of backlash from the fans if the supposed Star Trek Legacy series had Seven in command of the Titan and not Riker who made it famous. So renaming it to Enterprise G allow them to make that show and maybe add in a new Titan with Captain Riker once again in command.

[@michaelpapp5518]

@@DarkLordDiablos I don’t think having Seven Captain the Titan is much different than Shaw. Why would we expect Riker to go back to active duty?

[@DarkLordDiablos]

@@michaelpapp5518 I didn't say he would and Shaw being in command on Picard is different than him doing so in s series which is what I'm talking about. The fans of the book series wouldn't be happy if the Titan they read about finally got a TV series and Captain Riker wasn't in command. Renaming the ship to Enterprise allows for another Titan to be built with Riker in command.

[@etorres4u]

The problem with that is that we now have a small, underpowered and almost obsolete ship named the Enterprise G. We might as well get weekly episodes of the Enterprise G getting her ass kicked by shuttlecraft piloted by tribbles?

[@startrek21000]

If they were going to rechristen, I would've opted into calling her the USS Picard. In all fairness, it sticks with the "Name matters" message while honoring the heroics of Picard. I felt kinda off-put from the Enterprise-G bit since the ship doesn't follow the natural evolution of the Enterprise design language imo

[@BullGator-kd6ge]

Should’ve brought back the USS Stargazer from S2. Having a S3 hero ship named after Picard’s first command could’ve been more poignant.

[@riccardogemme]

If they renamed his ship "Picard", Shaw would really have begun turning with exponentially accelerating speed in his grave.

[@themadoneplays7842]

" I felt kinda off-put from the Enterprise-G bit since the ship doesn't follow the natural evolution of the Enterprise design language imo" Except it kind of does, and personally I can see nearly every incarnation of her in this design, from the rounded saucers of the A, B and C. To the broad secondary hull of the B and D. Then there is the needle like nacelles calling back to the E (not to mention the pylons and the lot.) In fact the only on-screen enterprise its not like is the F, but then again it had some unusual features, better suited for a video game than a mainline Enterprise. It also shares little with the NX-01 Enterprise, but meh.

[@rga0019]

@@themadoneplays7842 I don’t see how it could evolve into the Enterprise-J though. The ship’s _way_ too small, the design’s more brutalist than sleek, the nacelles are *_TINY_* as hell, etc.

[@iamoctonate]

​@@rga0019 And that's why you are not a writer. There is 100 years between this show and the 26th century with 3 Enterprise letters (H, I, J) and that's assuming that the G isn't just a more short-term placeholder, and the F is refit and recommissioned in the future. On another point, the Enterprise J we see the in Enterprise might also just be an alternate timeline that Archer prevented (that was implied). It could be that big, but there is also a possibility that the prime J that we do end up getting isn't small, but more practical.

[@AndrewPonti]

Sorry for my pending all caps but OH MY GOD THIS VIDEO. YES YES YES YES. Hits the nail on the head about Trek and how it can be done correctly. Whether it's Star Trek: Voyager or Star Trek: Titan or Star Trek: Deep Space Nine - we can have stories about non-Enterprises. Yes, we ALL LOVE the Enterprise. Our first love. But damn, such a lost opportunity, like you said. Trek is nothing but about diversity, intellectual discussions, allegorical/moral/ethical commentary, tongue in cheek humor and YES even badass space battles ala "Sacrifice of Angels" to save the galaxy once more. They jumped the shark at the end. I fully expected like you said - Titan to be fixed up under Seven and go on adventures, then the Enterprise G (a brand new ship with those upgrades so it can't be hacked again like them getting rid of holo-comms after first season of DISCO because of the issues they had) can be there too. I also still think they can do a Titan under Riker, but that's too late now. That only could have worked around 2010 had there not been the interregnum post ST:ENT.

[@DarthAzabrush]

I'm reminded of Gene Roddenberry's show bible that stated that "the Starship Enterprise is the central character of this show" which Rick Berman correctly called bullshit on with DS9 and we've never looked back.

[@MultiMackD]

Wanna make 7 Captain of the Entreprise? Go right ahead But it would've made more sense to make the Enterprise-G a whole new ship entirely, preferably the most advanced ship Starfleet had to offer

[@WinterRav3n]

Agree! But also from the point of view, that every sigle new ship caring the name Enterprise was bigger in dimensions. NX01 < NCC 1701 < A < B < C < D < E < F > G H < J (3,21 km) and Constitution V3 is the new Flagship? Sorry? But I think circus was in town.

[@DarinRWagner]

I found the choice to make the next Enterprise a ship that was smaller and less tactically powerful a very interesting choice. I don't know if the G is going to be the Federation flagship, but let's assume it were... it reminds me a little of the US Navy's flagship, the USS Constitution out of Boston MA... the oldest active-duty ship in the US Navy. Now, I'm sure the G won't be relegated to diplomatic and ceremonial duties, but you get the idea. The US Navy's flagship isn't an aircraft carrier or a battleship... it's an old, wooden, wind-powered heavy frigate from the War of 1812.

[@zac3278]

Amazing that the starships displayed at the Fleet Museum represent a longer period of time than that between the Constitution and the ships of today.

[@runemastertan]

Smaller, yes. Less powerful? We dunno. There is a 1 year stop gap, and seems that the ship was going for its shake down cruise, which suggests that the titan was upgraded / refitted

[@ivandiaz8892]

I greatly enjoy this criticism. I legitimately believed that we would pan over the Titan towards another area of the space dock to see a brand new ship called the Enterprise G, which would’ve been fine by me. I skipped both Seasons 1 & 2 of Picard and stopped watching Discovery after Season 2, I haven’t gone anywhere near Prodigy or Lower Decks, but I have seen Strange New Worlds. New Trek if anything divided the fanbase, but now it seems to be trying to mend that relationship. At first, I thought it was too little too late, but then Strange New Worlds came out, and I have my criticisms of the show, but none have to do with the writing, at least for the most part. Then I watched Picard Season 3, and I am hopeful of Star Treks' future. And isn’t that, Treks’ ultimate mission? Not to take away our fear of the future, but to reassure us that there is indeed hope? Because one day WE ALL will be in space, the final frontier, voyaging on starships not limited to the Enterprise, on continuing missions, to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, and to boldly go where no one has gone before!

[@drewf41]

Personal opinion, but, Prodigy and Lower Decks are on the same level as SNW. I was skeptical about Prodigy, myself. It's definitely written for someone who isn't a Trekie, but a great intro for the legacy. Explaing UTs, tricorders, and phasers in a kids way.

[@skinder124]

@@drewf41 i agree, Prodigy was surprisingly good

[@VME-Brad]

I think you're underplaying the original series here a bit. It's not just Uhura that was the diversity at the time. The 1960's were the HEIGHT of the cold war. Having a Russian manning the weapons was a HUGE thing. There was still resentment towards Japan at the time, so having a Japanese man piloting the ship, was a big thing too. Even with Uhura, they pushed the boundaries, they got in trouble for that onscreen interracial kiss. But the key thing about Star Trek? It's never been "about" the things that are "pushing the boundaries". When Kirk kissed Uhura, the problem was that the Plutarians forced them to do it against their will, that robbing of free will was the conflict, not the kiss. When in DS9 they had the onscreen lesbian kiss, it was "about" the symbiotes having been in a relationship in prior hosts and them doing so again being against their laws. And I think that's (part of) why Discovery did so poorly, they made everything blatantly "about" the current thing, instead of just making the way they thought things should be seem normal and make the conflict something else.

[@AdmiralBlackstar]

I always assumed with the Sao Paulo that she was fresh out of the shipyards, so no one to tick off.

[@stephenboshears4832]

My favorite head cannon is that the Enterprise A was a mothball ship that they pulled out of storage to keep Kirk out of trouble. So renaming a second old constitution to Enterprise is entirely consistent with the Federation.

[@MD2389]

The part that got me was why the G even needed to exist when we never saw the F get destroyed in the first place? Or if it was destroyed, it was a blink and miss it scene.

[@Gregg29407]

Exactly! What happened to the Enterprise F? They released it with all that fanfare and fireworks, then everyone turned Borg, had a big fight, and a year later, the Enterprise G pops up. Thye can't have 2 Enterprises in service at the same time, can they?

[@Saiyan0X]

@@Gregg29407 Actually, it was being decommissioned, and that was the last flight of Enterprise F

[@jasonbaade]

Agreed. Also, we really plow through Enterprises. We used up D-F in less than 40 years! Come on. I would not want to serve on Enterprise! It's a death wish. And we know that J exists in the distant future. So, they must learn to preserve Enterprises at some point.

[@AlexMcshred6505plus]

Not actually that distant, people confuse Daniel's birth century (31st century, he says he's born approximately 900 years after the present (2150's) when he confesses his identity to Archer in "Cold Front") with the time he took Archer to when the J battles the sphere-builders (26th century). The J is only a bit over a century away from 2401, they kinda need to cram a few in to preserve continuity.

[@Paleorunner2]

@@AlexMcshred6505plus Only the H and I.

[@AlexMcshred6505plus]

@@Paleorunner2 the point is had they not blasted through the F and immediately shoehorned the G then they’d’ve had to fit F, G, H, & I in the span of a bit over a century in a universe where excelsior class ships had been known to last over 100 years with some retrofit updates. Assuming each one had a good 30 years of service with no gaps in between them at all then that is already encroaching on the 26th century. There was a gap between NX-01 and 1701, between B and C, and between C and D (quite a large one if I remember yesterday’s enterprise correctly) so the precedent isn’t that the shipyards always start work on a new Enterprise as soon as one is destroyed.

[@AtheistPilgrim]

Enterprise A lasted 7 years. That's it. Not all of them last long.

[@jasonbaade]

@@AtheistPilgrim Enterprise A is in the Fleet Museum. It lasted over a hundred years.

[@jamesp8164]

The Titan should've kept it's name. The best way to end it would've been for an admiral to contact La Forge and say something like "we need to get the Enterprise D back into service after these events. She's old though and will need a refit to be brought up to current spec. Do you think you can manage that?" At this point La Forge hands the admiral a data pad with a design for a refit that has three nacelles. "She'll need an additional nacelle to keep up with modern power requirements, but yes, I've been thinking on it."

[@bobby75044]

If my information is correct, the Titan was the last active duty Constitution III Class. The original Enterprise was a Constitution Class, which in a way of thinking brings Star Trek full circle and opens a door to a possible new series in the Constitution Class Enterprise.

[@johnsahanatien6925]

A well crafted essay for sure. The rebuttal would be. “Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise.”

[@dougs7367]

I was honestly expecting the Titan to be renamed USS Jean Luc Picard

[@vontar1]

I fully disagreed with refitting a 20 year ship and renaming it. I felt a refit and to be captained by Seven would have been great. A new Enterprise G should have been under construction in the back ground. As for the NCC-Sao Paulo I felt the pulled it from mothballs so I didn't have a problem with that rename.

[@roywhiteo5]

I think it was brand new so the name chance was not significant

[@vontar1]

@@roywhiteo5 it wasn't new. remember Liam Shaw had to help release the warp Nacelle housing so they could get energy from the waves hitting them in the nebula. He talked about the ship was so old, many of the younger crew would not have known how. It needed an old grease monkey. Unless you meant to refer to the NCC-Sao Paulo, I believe it was brand new. O'brien had to fix things on it like he did the original Defiant.

[@twoimse]

You forgot to mention Picard's first ship of Stargazer.

[@texasabbott]

Another starship will bear the name “Titan”, and this presents the opportunity to give it to a vessel bristling with so many weapons and physically imposing enough to fit its name.

[@_WillCAD_]

It's not named for the mythical figure. It's named for the largest moon of Saturn (second-largest in the solar system). All of the Luna class ships were named for moons in the Sol system.

[@DarthAzabrush]

That's a fair point. Every Titan we've seen in both Alpha and Beta sources has been a light Cruiser. The name screams Battleship or Carrier.

[@Knight121198]

A Yorktown variant of the Odyssey class starship.

[@oldered5663]

They should have slid into STO continuity with the whole "Lack of older captains" plot point being explained by the "Bog Event"

[@christopherkomer2982]

Finally finished Season 3 of Picard so I can now watch this video and I fully agree. Enterprise F wasn't seen destroyed and there's no canon knowledge of that ship. It could still be the best of the best. I liked the Titan name should have stuck with it.

[@robb-kx6wu]

I think from a story point of view, the gravity of the name Enterprise is huge, and that's the point. The Enterprise name has a huge legacy, the first warp 5 ship, the Constitution Class ship who's delta shield emblem became the insignia of Starfleet, the Constitution refit that preserved the Khitomer Accords, the Excelsior class ship that prevented the Romulan Klingon alliance with the Tomed incident, the sacrifice of the Ambassador Class at Narendra 3, the voyages of the Galaxy-Class, the battle hardened Sovereign Class... Legacy, that's the point. Now... We have a new captain with her own storied legacy, assimilated as a child, stripped of her humanity, reintegrated into human society, finding her own way, the seemingly adopted daughter of Admiral Janeway... As strong of a character as the name Enterprise itself, and now, she is the captain of a ship who's name is the pride of Starfleet. To me, it's fitting, to have the two paired.

[@DarkLordDiablos]

I agree and I'm glad someone has said it as most of the comments here seem to be jumping on the bandwagon of agreement with the channel and with the STO fans of the Odyssey Class who are butt hurt that their favourite ship finally gets a canonical appearance only to then get decommissioned. They should think about the book fans of the USS Excalibur who have yet to see their favourite ship canonised.

[@robb-kx6wu]

@@DarkLordDiablos yeah I think the throwback hints at the uniform design along with the Neo-Constitution Class design are wonderful indicators of where Legacy could be headed, along the lines of SNW. I'm excited to see where the series goes.

[@ShipsoftheOceans]

*3 Constitution Class ships named Enterprise.*

[@DarkLordDiablos]

@@ShipsoftheOceans technically it's 2 as the Enterprise A is a Refit like the original. The Enterprise didn't get a new class of ship until the Enterprise B Excelsior class so it's more like two and a half.

[@DarkLordDiablos]

@@robb-kx6wu I hope Star Trek Legacy gets the go ahead as it's a waste of s teaser ending if it doesn't. That and we need a live action series to balance out SNW being in the 23rd Century and Discovery ending it's run in the 32nd. Not to mention the remaining crew from the Titan deserve to do more than just be named extras in another show. Lastly we absolutely 100% need to know what Captain Seven's launch word is going to be. 🤣

[@SenorGato237]

I seem to remember that the Sao Palo had just come off the production line?

[@MajorMagna]

If anything, in my head, it should have been the Enterprise E being decommissioned, the F is launched (perhaps a rechristened USS Verity, Picard's last command), departing alongside the Titan A (to contrast with the final scene of Star Trek VI, where the Excelsior leaves for parts unknown, leaving the Enterprise A behind) with Seven, Raffi, and Jack staying aboard the Titan.

[@Lonewanderer30]

And no, the Titan helped save the quadrant. But was the Enterprise D which did the vast majority of the heavy lifting vs the Borg. Titan wouldn't have lasted against the Cube.

[@steeltimberwolf]

Regarding the USS Sao Paulo, it had no service history. Immediately upon being launched from Utopia Planitia Shipyards it was crewed by a skeleton crew to transfer the ship to DS9 to replace the lost USS Defiant. She was launched on stardate 52889.3 and delivered at DS9 on stardate 52891.3. Sisko requested special dispensation to rename her the Defiant. I do agree that renaming the Titan-A the Enterprise-G was 100% nostalgia grab, especially since the Titan-A had a service history that spanned 5 years and 36 missions. You're right that they screwed up because the point of Star Trek was never the starships, it was the crew. The ship was just the set piece everyone played on, but how the crew interacted with each other and their adventures is what mattered. They should have honored the Titan-A and the sacrifices of her crew by allowing the ship to continue since she was an integral part of saving of the Federation. Make another Enterprise but keep the Titan-A. Paramount seems to constantly painting themselves into a corner like Star Wars did. Not everything has to revolve around the Enterprise, just like how everything in Star Wars doesn't have to revolve around; the Force, Jedi v Sith.

[@timefilm]

They could have named the ship Picard and then the show could have kept going without Patrick Stewart.

[@morrisfoston2]

For the first time,... I completely agree with your assessment!

[@Zeta1127]

The Enterprise-E and the Enterprise-F were both done dirty out of pure spite. The Enterprise-E is apparently destroyed off screen completely disrespecting her 3 films. The STO crowd finally gets the Enterprise-F canonized, at its decommissioning, so they can shove a new Enterprise at us without any strings attached. There doesn't always have to be an Enterprise at all times. There was a 19 year gap between the Enterprise-C and the Enterprise-D. The Enterprise-F should have been the new Enterprise, not the old Enterprise, because it was always going to be a blank slate, since they were never going to follow STO.

[@danielcraig9666]

The Sao Paulo is a bad example too, it had seen no service prior to delivery to DS9. The only voyage it took was the trip from Planitia Utopia to DS9 for delivery.

[@arugulatarsus]

I was wondering if they were going to re-name the Titan to the Saratoga. But I sighed when it was named the enterprise.

[@Lonewanderer30]

It's bad enough that they renamed the Titan, destroying its legacy. But the Titan is also a journeyman of ships. It's not near powerful enough to be a flagship, something the Enterprise always was. The Enterprise D would own the Titan in battle, let alone the E! Don't get me started on the E simply disappearing......

[@crippletime]

I don't understand how changing the name of the ship helps those in power stay in power. Not saying you're wrong just that one goes over my head. Also that last clip was *chefs kiss*

[@DoctorRobertNeville]

Even the U.S. Navy has been known to change names for ships. When the U.S.S. Hornet sunk during battle in WWII they renamed another ship the U.S.S. Hornet. AKA "The Grey Ghost". After the war some Japanese sailors said when the saw the Hornet they thought is was a ghost ship.

[@danny117fc]

i thought shaw was the best part of the show tbh

[@breacat]

Agreed. It's one thing to take a ship that just came off the production line and rechristen it since there's no history, but this ship had a very good history.

[@lbco13]

A better way this couldve been done is some mention that a newly constructed Neo-Connie was rechristened as the Titan-A/B after the battle at earth in order for this new hero ship to be back in the field. Then it would allow the legacy of the titan to continue without burying it in fanfare. Though honestly, i wouldve preffered the ship to be christened as the USS Picard instead of the Enterprise. A way of showing to Picard that his legacy, his name will be carried forward. Something he struggled with in Generations. Could also add that Jack Crusher kept his mothers name.

[@AustinFan4Life]

The USS Yorktown was renamed the USS Enterprise 1701-A, event after committing 17 violations of Starfleet regulations, so there is precedent for having a ship renamed after literally saving the Universe.

[@rodneywilson9192]

Love your channel and your warnings. I’ll be back after my and my wife finish season 3

[@LoreReloaded]

Don’t watch my most recent either due to spoilers!

[@Taz.B]

Glad you spoke on what I felt.

[@randybentley2633]

I couldnt agree more! It was a profound disrespect to the Titan A to do what they did to it. When a ship garners enough renown to lockdown the NCC, you do Not rename it, period.

[@beyondu77]

100% agree. The Titan being renamed to the Enterprise G is a slap in the face. There should have been a new Enterprise.

[@jhmcd2]

In the Sau Paulo case, the Sau Paulo was a brand new ship. It had just been commissioned before being sent to DS9. So the ship had no history other than a shake down cruise. Also, its common in tines of war to rename a newer ship after an old one for the purpose of moral. But I agree with the rest. Also, it's a major slap in the face the the Enteprise's legacy as the Enteprise has always been a state of the art capital ship and not some random vessel in the fleet that looks completely outdated the moment it launched.

[@Forge17]

I’m guessing they thought fans would fall in love the Titan’s design more than the Enterprise F, which is just baffling. It doesn’t hold a candle to it. The Odyssey class is stunning next gen flagship material, and less than 20 years old at the time of S3.

[@dixievfd55]

USS Yorktown was rechristened USS Enterprise-A in The Voyage Home. Things like this happen in real life navies, too. The Kirov was originally the Slava.

[@theMightywooosh]

Yes Enterprise g should have been a new ship built for seven This became a new show...Shaw commanding the Titan could make regular guest appearances I think a future show combining characters and storylines based onthe next generation,Voyager, and DS9 would be interesting

[@xenniealsentinel1800]

Trash the g somehow Hansen finna captain the voyager A !

[@nhbountyhunter]

The "Enterprise" is a symbol. It oozes prestige, respect, and honor. Starfleet as well as humanity needed something to get behind, much like a country's flag. With the scar left by the Borg and resources drained (life and materials) it was the right call to rename a ship that showed it had heart. Remember how the statue of liberty save the day in Ghostbusters 2? Starfleet needed that as well. Not to win the day but a thing that people could look to, an idea manifested. That is the enterprise. For the Titan think of it as a promotion. That ship just got promoted to admiral.

[@RyuuTenno]

I was honestly expecting a scene similar to what we got at the end of Star Trek IV. Kirk and crew still got the Enterprise, but Sulu had the excelsior, so we’d see the Titan *first* then we’d see the Enterprise. And yes I 100% agree this was a disservice to both ships/crews; both in universe and out. Though ironically this would be in keeping with Starfleet’s broken logic, lol.

[@Jarsia]

The Sao Paulo was brand new AFAIK. It MAY have gone on to do great things and earn it's name, and it did, just as the Defiant. And certainly having the legendary Defiant rise from the ashes like a phoenix would be a great morale boost for the fleet before invading Cardassia. When the Yorktown was rechristened to 1701-A(if we take that as canon) could have been a ship at the tail end of it's service that was already close to or at the end of it's life, and was given a service extension and renamed for Kirk and his crew. This could explain all the problems Scotty had in TFF. It was an old ship with a bunch of problems. Not every ship goes to the museum, most are scrapped. If this was going to be Yorktown's fate before STIV, then it's not nearly as disrespectful. The Titan-A was instrumental in saving the federation, and deserved to fly under that name alongside the greats. Very disrespectful to that ship's lineage.

[@warmachine9846]

I tend to agree with your assessment of it's disrespectful to the crew of the Titan and a ship that made its name under technically under Shaw. But realistically the ship was under the command of Pickard and Riker. I do however wholeheartedly agree with your assertion that they should have built a new top-of-the-line ship and named it Enterprise G. However I do like the design of the Constitution 3 class. And I'm happy that we will be seeing it again

[@depreseo]

"Don't let name fool you, this isn't some fresh-out of dry-dock starfleet engineering experiment built for banquets and balls which has never been put through it paces. This a front line ship with years on her millage and decades of experience in her bones. The admiralty may have given her a fresh coat of paint and slapped on a "G" to her new name, but beneath all of that she's a Titan. Shields up. Red alert!"

[@jefferyseay5846]

Great video. I agree 100%! The USS Titan was the ship that saved the day. It should have remained the “Titan.”

[@davidslaughterii1401]

I can't agree more. That Starfleet renamed the Titan-A to Enterprise-G was not only spitting on the legacy of the Titan, but also Shaw who died in the service of his ship. Personally, I think Season 3 was something of a slight of hand, as Shaw was practically booted from his captain's seat in favor of Riker and Picard taking turns with commanding. In a way, I felt as if the season, and in particular with Riker and Picard, it felt like Kirk all over again. He did all he could to remain in command of the Enterprise, until he was forced to realize that the captain's seat had to be passed on, such as the case with Star Trek Generations when he would refuse command of the Enterprise-B. Personally, I was hoping for a new class of starship for the Enterprise-G and felt let down when it was just the Titan-A. It felt too much like lip service.

[@blaircrocker9845]

The point I took is the Enterprise is a character in the show as important as the crew because its the medium for the stories to be told. The central figure is the ship.

[@travisgames6608]

I agree 100%. Idk why the Titan was renamed, considering the original Titan was legendary in its own write under Riker's command. The next Enterprise should have been a new ship and not revealed this soon. Should have done it in the spinoff series.

[@gideo5792]

Not to mention how STO fans got snubbed by how the long-awaited Odyssey class became canon just to be a stepping stone for the Titan.

[@afoolandhismoneychannel]

Any mariner worth his salt knows that re-naming a vessel is bad luck.

[@emperorofscelnar8443]

I have been saying this on other channels, the USS Titan NCC-80102-A helped save Earth by holding back an entire Fleet of Borg controlled ships only to be given the middle finger and stripped of a legacy for no reason. If I where to have an Enterprise G it would be a sister ship of the USS Titan A and at least name a third ship the USS Liam Shaw in honour of him, robbing the Titan of a legacy after it helped save Earth from an invasion is just rude not to mention a taboo by real life naval standards.

[@emperorofscelnar8443]

What they should have done: Keeping the USS Titan NCC-80102-A as it is. Build sister ships called the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-G, USS Picard, USS Riker, USS Liam Shaw and the USS Legacy.

[@ravenRedwake]

I think I could “fix” discovery by having their new sphess tech be a test mission that jumps them the the far future past the burn, and it would be thousands if not tens of thousands of years where the galaxy is like what it is when they get there. Drop the Micheal is tangentially related to Spock thing, have it be she was a human taken in by Vulcans just make up other characters. Drop the time power armor thing. But it sets the events of the show so far into the future where dilithium and warp travel is so rare it’d pretty much parallel the end of Old Night in Warhammer 40k’s lore when the Discovery comes to that time.

[@huftlansa]

Naming this ship Enterprise-D is the same thing as naming an electric SUV "Mustang"

[@etorres4u]

Am I the only one who is more than a bit disappointed that they never said what happened to the Enterprise E? The E deserved more than two throwaway comments by Worf only to be forgotten after that. I would have loved to see the D and E fighting side by side against the Borg.

[@flood256]

the Rechristening thing also happened with a previous enterprise. the Enterprise A was originally the Yorktown

[@DreadTheMaximus]

Agree, I was about to say this but i guess you beat me to it

[@pyronuke4768]

Has that been confirmed in canon? I know a number of beta canon sources say it was, but the problem with beta canon is, well, it's extremely subject to be overwritten if the main canon says so.

[@LoreReloaded]

It’s never been confirmed in canon but does make sense

[@Ingo64]

What happened to the Enterprise F? It seems the durability of the Enterprises becomes shorter with every new letter of the alphabet.

[@everettjohnson9374]

I was never a big fan of the Titan and really any other ship but the Enterprise getting a A, B, C etc at the end of it. Put the name on other ships sure but it's starts to dilute the importance if several ships all have it. If it was just the Titan then I'd have been upset with the Change but that's a personal preference. I took it in universe as they got their shit rocked and lost who knows how many high ranking officers so they had to work with what they had, out of universe...well no Shaw...so idk if I'd stick around for a new show featuring them. HE was a breath of fresh air for the series

[@ThatElfNerd]

While I agree that they shouldn't have renamed the ship, there could be an in-canon reason for changing the Titan's name, and that's to give it a better reputation. While the Titan was vindicated for disobeying Starfleet, it was on the galaxy's most wanted for harboring a fugitive, effectively acting against it's commanding officer, breaking into a classified research station, AND violating the treaty of Algeron by stealing and using a cloaking device completely unsanctioned. By renaming the Titan to the Enterprise, Starfleet has effectively wiped their hands clean of many of those problems. The Titan's reputation can't be tarnished if the Titan no longer exists.

[@12habits4allofus]

Fair points. And I am thinking the Paramount reach is the correct one - nostalgia bait, overplayed. The in-universe reasoning was concocted to justify it.

[@djstokley3151]

I was upset that they did not name the Titan the USS Shaw. I was upset that the new Enterprise was not the flagship. It would have been nice to have that same scene but the ship being called the USS Shaw. Everyone would smile and remember Shaw's sacrifice. Then it should have panned over with a massive flagship. Starfleet's best technology. That should have been the USS Enterprise G. And Picard should have told seven. Because of Shaw's recommendation she gets to command the flagship because she is the future of Starfleet. Then through her leadership she could have raised up another generation of new leaders.

[@boletop6204]

exactly this, except the part where seven takes over the enterprise.. in a perfect world, seven would become the captain of the uss shaw, and riker would become the captain of the enterprise g and we would get a series with him as the main character, not a series with damn seven of nine and raffi lol

[@feralstorm]

Considering how much the end of Picard tries to set up a new series, renaming the ship is more disappointing as it (potentially) results in two concurrent Star Trek series (SNW and Legacy), each with their own ship named Enterprise, both curiously similar in shape.

[@EliotHochberg]

Or… it could have been named Picard, because all the other shows had a ship at the center

[@owenwildish331]

Imagine the plot twist if instead of the Titan-A becoming the Enterprise-F (which I kind of suspected was going to happen, or rather I had a feeling the next Enterprise might be a Neo-Constitution Class, although I do agree the Titan shouldn't have been renamed), we have a sort of a Star Trek IV type reveal as Geordi La Forge explains that the Enterprise-D wasn't the only ship he had been restoring and we then see it's the old TOS style Constitution Class that's now (ironically) the new the Enterprise... lol

[@TomtcCalano]

I was having similar issues with the renaming. It didn't sit well with me.... I didn't like it. You articulated some points I had not considered or haven't completely processed to WHY it didn't sit well. I knew I didn't like... it didn't feel right... disappointment is a good term... Titan, I believe, should have stayed Titan. It was never an Enterprise and feels awkward now having to call it by a name to which its history is not linked to it.

[@frocurl]

Yeah that was the stupidest thing ever to be done. They already rolled out a new enterprise then in the same breath destroyed it tookba beloved beta ship and slapped enterprise on it. Made me sick

[@incogni-bro8276]

The Neo-Constitution honestly feels like a step back from the Odyssey.

[@hellfish2309]

Good conclusion: I think the Enterprise B and C give credence to your argument too I didn’t care for the Enterprise-F, BUT its design is both internally consistent and the happy medium between the flying Marriott Galaxy-class and the damascus steel katana of the Sovereign-class, exactly the flagship of a the fleet doctrine of Starfleet after the Dominion War

[@pyronuke4768]

I really like the -F's design (especially considering it was made by a fan for a STO contest back in 2011). My main issue however is that it just feels slapped in, a hollow gesture designed to generate fan bait. I remember back in October when the -F showed up in the trailer and half the community lost their minds; and then the show aired and didn't do anything with it except immediately replacing it with the Titan-A.

[@themadoneplays7842]

I dunno when I first saw the Titan A I thought "is this the new enterprise?"

[@deathscthye02]

I personally felt it as disrespectful of both namesakes. The legacy of the Enterprise speaks for itself, thus why there will always be an Enterprise. However like you said the Titan had earned her own legacy and deserved to continue on.

[@glenkellner9936]

The earliest this show could be out is 3 years plus we can pick up who knows in show time, plenty of opportunities for a new ship.

[@Lonewanderer30]

Yeah, they're going through Enterprises like skittles these days....🙄🙄

[@shaneabreu9271]

The Naval tradition that goes back to the Era of Poseidon itself clearly reminds sailors that to rename a ship is to tempt the wrath of the god, and by extension curse it with bad luck. Furthermore, to rename a ship that already has its own legend forged in not only its predecessors hull, but in the new one as well, is in my mind a disrespect to the name and more so the crew who died serving her. Be it for good or bad, souls are surrendered to that ship, that name, that ledger. Regardless of what new name it takes on, it serves only to erase its past and heave it to the sea to be lost in the deep. It is fair for Poseidon to curse such actions. For this reason, this ship and its series I suspect will find the curse reach out and strangle it. Not by its fate in the story, but the sum of failure as a series. It is unfortunate to those who will work on the series, as if my theory holds true, it is they who will go down with the ship, not those who are responsible for this crime.