Steve Parish EXPLAINS How Crystal Palace AVOID PSR Breaches Amid Debate On Man City 115 Charges

[@wrighthartlane99]

One of my favourite owners in the league.

[@JuanRamirez-tb8db]

Why is Steve Parish always on talksport when Simon Jordan is off air

[@ApacheTheCat]

because hes a coward whos full of s****

[@jonnyanderson4364]

Ha ha ha

[@KOA0693]

Because he doesn’t need to validate himself to a pompous failed former club owner

[@blinkin78]

Probably because he’s running a successful club and not being a mouthpiece on a tinpot talk radio station?

[@jonnyanderson4364]

@@blinkin78 if this is tinpot, avoid Sky Sports news!!

[@derrickwinter9737]

Steve parish talking sence about the champions 👏👏👏 clearly an intelligent person not talking through is A hole just for the sake of it … be better not bitter 🏆🏆🏆🏆mcfc🩵

[@danielrubenferreira6280]

Let me guess ? You’re City fan obviously you going to say that

[@derrickwinter9737]

@@danielrubenferreira6280 Is Steve Parish a city fan? Your missing the point dum dum😭

[@Chris-oz9qx]

​@@derrickwinter9737yeah, he's stated that to be charged the charges have to be proven by numerous panels and officials. City are obviously going to be found guilty and be docked about 70 points, that's down to the championship for you.

[@MANCHESTER.IS.BLUE.49]

​@@Chris-oz9qx... 5peat on its way...🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵

[@peterruff5810]

You can get your 5 peat in the Championship , without getting promoted.

[@waz1092]

Spoke very well ❤

[@spark556]

Talksport talks more about city charges than football 😂

[@interstellarbeatteller9306]

Chelsea & Man U fans also say Talksport picks on them :D

[@Metali-tin]

@@interstellarbeatteller9306 And they are ridiculous for saying such. It is quite literally measurable. How long did they spend on the Chelsea allegations of years of financial irregularities under Abramovic? Have they started an agenda asking for the progress on the ongoing investigation, piling pressure on the PL? No. Was it given even nearly the same amount of attention as City's, given it's every bit as serious and could implicate multiple titles(PLs and CLs)? Not even close. Has it been treated with anywhere near the same energy(stirring up resentment as much as possible, zero balance on many of their videos for years now). It's been nowhere near the same. They've gotten off very very lightly by comparison so far. Even with the current spending they are getting off fairly lightly. City's spending was nowhere near as bad as Chelsea's in the past 2 seasons, the press literally lied about Pep spending 200m every season. Just because he was left with a massive rebuild(the back line all over 30 and unable to play out from the back) when he joined which took 2 seasons... Chelsea weren't in that position when the new ownership arrived, the lack of balance is evident here. They lied that every mistake made on transfers, 'City just go out and spend another 50m'(BS propaganda). Never giving examples of course, forgetting the many times Pep has had to change the system exactly because he doesn't just go out and spend when there are setbacks. Chelsea's spending is criticised(how could they not) but the energy is not the same, it's a running joke almost. The difference is probably because they are not the dominant team and they don't scare anyone right now... Which is telling of what the City energy was always really about. It was because of how good City are and how well they are run. One of the best net spends in the league over the past 6-7 years... proving the first 2 years were all about that first rebuild and not the norm at all. While reversing that net spend situation from where it was in 2018, that 2018 squad has already been replaced near enough and even the squad from 3 years ago looks much different this season, KDB and Bernardo likely to leave next summer. United and Chelsea should be being roasted far more than they are for how poor they've been relative to them trying to throw money at all their problems for years(all the things people accused City of). United fans are so thin skinned and unable to take what they dish out, that they complained of bias and 'people picking on their club who should be sued' after a story which literally ran for less than a week. When it has now been proven there were valid questions to be asked based on the figures in the public domain because they were given far more special exceptions than anyone else(Arsenal aren't 20x smaller so that club size excuse was just poor). All we really know is what United asked for and why(that doesn't explain it fully)... Not why the PL allowed them everything they wanted, United fans talk as if Everton and Forest didn't ask for plenty of exceptions but didn't get nearly as many approved. UEFA didn't approve any of the exceptions United asked for with them, that's how they ended up being sanctioned. Which btw was treated very softly by the press when it wouldn't be for City... sold as a 'minor breach' and forgotten about by the press within days. Yet they think the UK press are against their club. In short don't talk disingenuous toilet to gaslight City fans who've literally looked into this far more deeply than you have for years now and have the receipts from the same sources to show the glaring differences in the coverage the cartel clubs get vs City. There is an agenda, the American interests are likely part of it. When you think about it, even just taking project big picture, the ESL plans and the fall out from them. The ideas were criticised but who were the architects from the PL and did any of the coverage suggest they were anything like the 'enemies of football' like the would ANY billionaire from the middle east, if they were at the forefront instead. You know the answer, they were even allowed to run damage control in the press, it couldn't be more different when it's red cartel or their owners.

[@interstellarbeatteller9306]

@@Metali-tin T**ksport are owned by a subsidiary of an American media company owned by the family of a guy named Rupert :) There is always more than meets the eye

[@iainchiz17]

Remember the good old days when we used to talk about football and not PSR or VAR.

[@interstellarbeatteller9306]

People complaining about the 'big six cartel' should consider the new rules could be worse than FFP & give them an even bigger advantage....70% -90% of revenues can be spent on squad costs - In 22/23, Man City's rev was £718M, while Bournemouth's was £141M

[@TheMercWithMouth]

Big six cartel is a term dreamt up by city fans to mess the actual narrative about them cheating.

[@lilbaz8073]

The new rules also include a spending cap.

[@interstellarbeatteller9306]

@@lilbaz8073 I thought he new rules were the spending cap...like in La Liga, clubs will only be able to spend a % of what they made the previous year.

[@lilbaz8073]

@@interstellarbeatteller9306 that is the cost control. The spending cap is that no club can spend more than 4x the amount the bottom club receives in tv revenue.

[@edwardeverett1157]

It’s based on the lowest ranked team

[@ashwilliams4959]

It's funny that every club except city have struggled with psr

[@GermanChickenwing]

If you do your research you would know why.Who has been cleaning up the trophies in the last 10 years? Do you also know City netspend around 50m in the past 5 years? It seems that doesn't fit your agenda

[@ashwilliams4959]

@@GermanChickenwing do you know who bought the pl the year before this handy psr thing started?

[@GermanChickenwing]

@ashwilliams4959 That's not the point you were making by your original comment..City not struggling with psr has nothing to do with City owner.. Newcastle says hey

[@MMKLYH]

Dont think anyone wonders how palace avoid any psr/ffp breaches

[@johnquigley9414]

A simple question. Why do the 14 clubs that AT THE MOMENT ,vote for rules that means they will never have a chance for rivalling the CLOSED SHOP of the top 6.& almost certainly it means they will never be able to get their hands on the loot that can be earned from European FootballTournaments. It’s a classic example of Turkeys voting for an earlier Christmas. WHY ?

[@Tallman-x3c]

Steve it doesn't matter if there different charges. They are cheats end of

[@robertmclellan3658]

Any proof or evidence?

[@roders007]

So many rules and regulations.

[@GermanChickenwing]

It seems a lot of people have no clue about the pl rules.. I believe this palace guy when he said City can challenge the pl in high court if found guilty..A lot of people are saying the pl dont have time barred, i am not sure of that.. He knows more than 90% of the media tho

[@MCFCTheMadHatter]

Couldn’t agree more👍

[@creepingbrain]

There is no time-barring for the PL rules. No doubt City will try to challenge any punishment but it'll only go as far as a second PL commission, like the Forest and Everton cases. CAS don't have jurisdiction. There is no pathway to taking it to the High Court or any other court. People overthink these things. It's very simple : to compete in the Premier League, to be a member of the Premier League, there are rules that you have to abide by, including the FFP rules. You sign up for these rules when you become a member. If you break the rules the Premier League can impose a punishment of fines, points deductions, nullifying of trophies won, and/or expulsion from the competition.

[@GermanChickenwing]

@@creepingbrain You mean just like people were saying a pl club can't sue the league until City did it?

[@TheMercWithMouth]

City owners are snakes. No smoke without fire 115 charges in any scenario is despicable.

[@GermanChickenwing]

@@TheMercWithMouth Borring, try something new

[@bobp4]

Yet more proof that the line that Chelsea/Villa take, that PSR is forcing them to sell their Academy products, is utterly false. As Parish says, this can be easily planned for, and the vast majority of PL clubs comply.

[@AAL-mu8ms]

Let's listen to a midtable loser with no ambition to win nowt

[@ryanjarrett8344]

@@AAL-mu8ms’loser’ is a very ironic statement to make 😂 he’s being interviewed on a major radio show about his views on something he’s qualified to talk about whilst you’re in the comments of that interview getting ignored 😂

[@AAL-mu8ms]

@@ryanjarrett8344 zzzzzzzz boot licker

[@CapeTownNick]

why faster, why not more accurate? So you prefer a verdict rightly or wrongly just so its done and not that its done in a manner that comes out with the correct verdict .... interesting

[@bojan1999]

Because the longer it takes the better for city. They will just keep stacking up trophies and keep delaying because they are funded by a state with endless money.

[@Bert-lw1ot]

@@bojan1999they don’t keep winning because of money. Or Man Utd and Chelsea would be finishing higher than 8th & 6th

[@oniondesu9633]

he obviously means speeing up the process while still being accurate. everyone knows systems like this are not very efficient at all.

[@bojan1999]

@@Bert-lw1ot Their foundation was built on fraud.

[@russellward4624]

​@Bert-lw1ot everybody wins because of money. Utd have spent more than anyone so please, save the tears. Chelsea have spent like 2b the last 3 years and where are they? It ain't due to City spending because they've got a net spend lower than lfc, utd, afc, cfc, etc..

[@soapboxparishrecordings5287]

Bottled it!!! Shows up on match day on a Sunday rather than in the week with Simon

[@luckyducky7166]

Chairman of an established Premiere League Club vs Ex Chairman /Owner of a yoyo club that went into administration. No contest.

[@paulenglish7500]

Should of asked he what's the story with that Palace investor looking to buy Everton.

[@MarcoSpeaksNadsat]

He already answered that with Jim White a couple of days ago.

[@MyAlan999]

Billion pound yearly industry and everyone's losing money , something's seriously wrong

[@OfficialINZ]

Overpaid players

[@nicmonberg5974]

It's BS a lot of these people have offshore companies/accounts which we don't see. The only time it would make sense is if you take a hit on club side because it opens doors in other businesses which is what it does for the Saudi owners etc. A business is not sustainable if you are always losing also makes 0 sense.

[@GBGOLC]

Except Tottenham Hotspur. They be making money, by not buying expensive players.

[@petersmith2522]

Clubs should not be funding other clubs they are rivals

[@Metali-tin]

Look someone talking like a grown up on Manchester City and FSR in general on talkSport for once. Much better than Simon Jordan and the likes, who constantly appeal to the lowest common denominator for clicks and likes. City hate sells because the average football fan has the IQ and the emotional control of a toddler but people in the professional are selling their souls for it really. Their profession is quite literally no longer respected and they only have themselves to blame for lowering the standard of integrity and professionalism for so long to suit their own petty agendas.

[@SophiaSmith24]

Is this Jordan’s mate

[@ApacheTheCat]

Jordan eats this used car salesman for breakfast

[@grahamskilling2147]

@@ApacheTheCator the other way round

[@luckyducky7166]

​@@ApacheTheCatParish lives rent free in Jordons head.

[@iainchiz17]

Steve parish the corrupt 6 ball cupper. Couldnt lie straight in bed.

[@markneeley]

This guy is an absolute drip.

[@paulbaxter8651]

Based on what? Clueless remark.

[@thedean4431]

thats the reason you never win anything steve

[@adamwade2054]

Stop saying you know ffs

[@ssatwick7584]

People are so obsessed with City and their charges. Try defeating us on pitch where actual football is played?

[@creepingbrain]

City don't have to play in the PL. They're not obliged to. Nobody is forcing them. But if you do want to play in the PL you have to play by the same rules as every other club. Why don't you try defeating other clubs without having the advantage of breaking the rules? We all know the reason.

[@Chris-oz9qx]

That's like Ben Johnson saying to Carl Lewis and Linford Christie in 1988, "yeah I was doped to my gills which is against the rules but how about you try beating me on the track"? You agreed to the rules, you broke the rules.

[@ssatwick7584]

again you havent read what i typed. football is won on the pitch and not in financial statements. Its nothing but cope. Chelsea spent 1.6 billion in 2 years and nobody bats an eye lid.

[@Chris-oz9qx]

@@ssatwick7584 that's Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal have abided by FFP and ran City close many times, If city hadn't built their success by cheating then Liverpool and Arsenal would have likely won more so you stop justifying breaking the rules your club signed up for

[@MarcoSpeaksNadsat]

Football journos are. Parish is only answering a question they asked him.

[@topcarib8488]

Cos Parish is a turncoat. Stabbed his mate in the back.

[@paulbaxter8651]

Rubbish.

[@jamiecummings9666]

Why is this clown on talksport. 70 million for gueri. 😂😂😂😂😂 On display yesterday. Probably a 20 mill player if that. Good job parish you just thrown 65 million away. Now pay the boy superstar wages 😂😂

[@PL-qv5te]

It’s not that hard to comply when you have no ambition to ever win anything like the Crystal Palace chairmen, but for teams even with a small amount of ambition, it’s very difficult to comply with PSI

[@OfficialINZ]

What he means is that you don’t need an entire department of people to work out if you’re going to be able to comply or not. All you need is your accountant to tell you whether you are over spending or not. It’s easy to workout

[@adamwade2054]

Your not allowed to win anything no more jack walker or Leicester city how very dare you

[@ApacheTheCat]

simon jordans shadow is on

[@charliemonkracing4849]

😂😂😂 clearly another Jordan fan who hasn’t done their research on his time at palace. Simon Jordan is a clown and a blatant liar about his time at palace. Proven by the fact he still thinks he owned the ground when the evidence is out there that he didn’t actually own it.