Tesla Model X Plaid 70-MPH Highway Range Test! Jordan Goes Far Below 0% To Get Every Mile Possible

Jordan takes the Out of Spec Model X Plaid out on our 70 mph range test.
Plus, a quick tour of where we start all these tests!
Shoutout to our sponsors for more information find their links below:
Kempower:
kempower.com/a...
Star Charge:
www.starcharge...
We would really appreciate it if you subscribe to our channel! The more subscribers we have, the more awesome opportunities we will be able to bring to you!
Find all of our Amazon must-haves here:
www.amazon.com...
Kyle on Twitter: @itskyleconner
Kyle on Instagram: @Virtualkyle
For more behind the scenes content:
Twitter: @Out_of_Spec
Facebook: / outofspecreviews
Instagram: @OutofSpecReviews
Inquiries: [e-mail]
Tesla Referral Code: www.tesla.com/...
TeslaFI Referral: www.teslafi.co...
If you liked this video, we recommend checking out some of our other channels!
Out of Spec Motoring: / outofspecmotoring
Out of Spec Reviews: / outofspecreviews

[@KyleConner]

*disclaimer!!* only Jordan can produce fun videos like this - mine suck, don’t expect me to do this 😅😂

[@NoHarmDunn]

I was just about to comment about that, like damn this looks super snazzy and…. stabilized 👀😂

[@777Outrigger]

Your videos are great. But this one does have a nice bit of flare.

[@JL-st1jf]

Yes Kyle. Your videos are too serious. Need more fun videos like this. LOL. Just kidding ofcourse. Love all of your videos!!

[@thumper1747]

Suggestion: Kyle does B2B and Jordan B2C?

[@heyfrancie]

Did you see that drone footage?! What an intro 🎥

[@kellyheath8547]

To get real technical, a tail wind and head wind do not cancel out. Aerodynamic drag is not linear, a 10mph headwind will consume more than a 10mph tail wind will save. I still like the video, thanks for your efforts.

[@spencerjoplin2885]

A 10 mph wind would demand 78% more power to drive into the wind than away from it: (70+10)^2/(70-10)^2= 1.78

[@WizdogC]

Jordan has really stepped up his presenting skills. And the editing and production on this video is really good. Bravo!

[@manny41p]

No one mentioned it but yes 3OH!3 was a great band growing up. Oh the memories lol

[@shadowharu]

Don't trust me

[@mrrkrr]

Oh yeah! Streets of Gold album is soooo good.

[@blanketwodahs6741]

My 2023 MY P gets 300wh/mile @ 70 in temperate weather. The 330-350wh/mile @ 70 around freezing for the X P doesn't surprise me at all.

[@777Outrigger]

Anyone notice that Tesla just lowered Supercharging prices to 31 cents/kWh from 41 cents in most areas of Colorado? I wonder why.

[@AaronMcFarland]

3OH!3 boulder band. Always fun to see someone make success from the Colorado area.

[@bryanduchane2371]

The temperature is the most critical variable to take into consideration when testing vehicle vs vehicle.

[@KyleConner]

Absolutely + wind

[@teslaemperorwithoutclothes4169]

100%. This test and result should not be compared to any tests done at freezing, nor at 80 degrees. Really there are a few windows where EV range makes dramatic jumps: 38F and below sees significant range loss that ramps up to severe as you go below freezing: 40-65F yields fairly consist diminished range, and 70F+ yields max ranges (that are usually advertised).

[@Radium3D]

And it’s good to test them in a variety of temperatures and log them all in a public Google sheet! Thanks @bjornnyland

[@naaspam1185]

Keep in mind he's testing in Colorado at a higher elevation than most people drive at. Cold increases air resistance. Elevation decreases it. Range tests are also impacted by the sun, given that a sunny day can warm the cabin of the car in the winter, reducing the use of the HVAC. An overcast day would have seen lower range. They should just test the summer range without sun (most optimal conditions), then test efficiency through various conditions. Cold weather in sun impacts efficiency by A%. Cold weather without sun impacts efficiency by B%. Warm weather in sun impacts efficiency by C%. Driving in rain impacts efficiency by D%. To get the worst case, it would be cold weather without sun in the rain. Are we starting to understand why road tripping in EVs is so much more complicated than gas vehicles? Range concerns will be especially problematic for those living in apartments / condos without a plug to charge overnight, and the worst the weather conditions, the higher the chance of lines at chargers. Waiting at a line at a gas station isn't a big deal. Each car takes like 5 minutes and it takes 5 minutes to fill the car up. Waiting at a line at a charger can take 15, 30, 45, even 60+ minutes, then you still have to add in the time to charge. PHEVs are generally the better choice for those with nightly charging, and hybrids for those without.

[@Radium3D]

It's not complicated when you're using navigation, at least on a Tesla. It factors in everything for you and the estimated arrival % is super accurate in my experience on road trips in mine.@@naaspam1185

[@moisesceja5294]

Jordan made a great vid. Kudos to Jordan on the production

[@ShawnGBR]

16:51 - Jordan mentions noise canceling. Here's how that works. The regular outside noise comes in as peaks and troughs of sound waves - the higher the peaks and the lower the troughs, the louder the sound. All the noise cancel system does is hears that sound coming in (using a microphone) and emits an "anti-sound"... exactly the same sound, but instead of a peak it'll give a trough (and vice versa) at exactly the same frequencies. How? The peaks are rapid bursts of high pressure air, the troughs are low pressure, so all the speaker has to do is sound off low to counteract high and high to counteract low. It does this thousands of times a second, and that flattens the waves into barely a ripple. A roar gets turned into a whisper - and it works better with low frequency noises that are constant, like the sound of road traffic at less than 1kHz, because the electronics in the noise canceling system has time to react much more effectively and it's a constant sound for the most part. kzbin.info/www/bejne/j53PnZhjetZnm80

[@Jordan_Schiefer]

Fantastic write up!

[@NitroZakis]

Good write up, but feels a bit like you're telling that this is a very simple tech, while it's definitely not in reality. The hardest part is to get this working smooth without too much oscillations and resonance because of sound reflections bouncing around.

[@aggiebrandon2007]

Exact configuration I'm picking up next week. Thank you for the content!

[@Captain_DeSync]

THE SPEED EGG!!

[@mcunha81]

i love the X, i guessed 240 miles on X,but really had no idea what the stated range was until u mentioned it,then i changed my guess to 285,and was nearly dead on. I like that idea,70mph range test for each car ,winter and summer. would be very interesting to see difference.. great videos as always.

[@tylergood1223]

Nice video! Can't wait to see the same test for the refreshed model 3 LFP!

[@sorka95032]

I have a screenshot from my MXP showing 268 wh/mile over 132 miles (commuting from work back to home) with a net elevation increase of 200 feet. This included a the 152 Pacheco Pass mountain range. Outside temp was 70F. It translates to 353 miles on a single charge in my case had I gone from 100% to -2%.

[@rkalla]

"4th phantom breaking of rhe day" - damn i thought it would have been better by now.

[@ALRinaldi]

Yessss! Been waiting on this for months!

[@patrickbarter]

It would be great if you guys could do a range-focused tire test. Seems like there are a few good efficiency-focused EV tuned options on the market these days, and for those who prioritize range, it would be great to have at least one credible source of information to refer to. I just got an 2024 Model Y and am grateful to this channel for existing. It would have been hard to find useful information without it.

[@vlad2838]

It’s been great to have Jordan back on the OoS team!

[@HOFFERN342]

Absolutely love the Model X.. especially in that combo. Still miss our 2017 100D with red/white combo and six seats. Might have to swap out the Model Y Performance for a new X soon..

[@lloyddobler5535]

I enjoy all of the outofspec videos, Jordan definitely has his flair. Great video!

[@CFG39]

The EV9 GT-L went nearly as far even though it has much more room, is considerably taller and boxier, heavier, has a useable 3rd row that even adults can fit into, a more useful trunk for tall items, larger wheels (21” vs. 20”), and even has wider tires (285mm on GT-L all around vs. 265F/275R on this X). For families the EV9 is a better vehicle. EV6 also charges a little bit faster, especially if you plug in at higher SOC. Tesla has higher peak charge rate but the 10-80% in the EV9 takes around 24 mins vs. ~30 for the X. EV9 is also less expensive and I think the average family would prefer the normal doors to the often problematic falcon wing doors on the X, and coming in about $25,000 less expensive is another bonus. Plaid is obviously faster but that’s irrelevant to the average family. Mid-4s 0-60 is faster than 90% of the cars on the road so I don’t think many will find the EV9 slow. I am curious why Kia went down on the voltage for the EV9 vs the other e-GMP cars and if Hyundai will do the same on the Ioniq 7. That vehicle looks to be more sloping in design which may do enough to bump up aerodynamic efficiency to bump up real world 70mph range to the ~300mi mark.

[@robertt1336]

Since teslas have the heat pump, poor weather only has a 15% impact (30 vs 70 degrees) right? If this was getting 295 or so, another 30 miles would’ve put it right at epa figure. Pretty impressive. Great video Jordan. Congrats on the nice car out of spec Dave!

[@loganrossignol]

I played don't trust me on my laptop in high school once in my AP lit class. I don't remember why this was the case, but I remember the immediate reaction my teacher had to it

[@mattieskola7050]

i have to agree obout kempower i live in Finnland i drive id3 and here we have lot of kempower chargers and they are unbeliveable reliable i have also used other brand (delta , tritium ,etc) and i had issues now and then but only once whit kempower and that was bashed plug . i dont have any money invested to this company i am just end user who enjoys reliable charging

[@thetriplees4290]

thumbnail- AMAZING!

[@wrxdrunkie]

Need an updated MY LR test

[@michaelsmithers4900]

I like that you mention efficiency somthing these range tests could use more of. To me efficiency matters more.

[@CarlBrusell]

This video is so much better than regular range tests one! Please keep going! 🤣

[@inciwillard991]

Interesting Avg.Energy! I have '23 MX 5 seater and usually drive between 65 to 70 mph with avg.energy 280 Wh/mi but then we are in a flat as a pancake low country area but always windy. Tested out on I-95 with avg.energy and it went down to 263 Wh/mi. It's still not as low as my '22 MS LR where under the same conditions the usage is between 225 to 230 Wh/miles.

[@vincentrobinette1507]

Keep in mind, this Tesla has 4 X more horsepower! The fact that it only uses 30% more energy is actually quite impressive.

[@ndear2955]

Nice video Jordan and cool drone footage!

[@CoachBorne]

Before I took delivery of my Y, I looked at EV6...they wanted $10K in Dealer Markup! Made it more expensive than Model Y Performance when it was $63K! Had 2 things on the Y...heads up display & color.

[@johnlabernik4599]

I would love to see your long term cars range tested in winter and summer. Seems like all the Teslas have been tested in spring/fall/winter temperatures.

[@danielvandermerwe7921]

It being cold reduces range by 30% or more. And smaller rims help a lot.

[@vishnumrao]

Range test should be done with a fully loaded car. Its very rare that someone drives a 6-7 seater vehicle with one person. I am sure no vehicle with 6 people and their luggage / gear will meet your numbers. Even if you can't put 6 people in the car, you should try putting some dummy weights in the seats or in the foot area on the floor to mimic 6 people sitting the vehicle.

[@maryannrondinella5680]

I also remember the local band 303. My only comment on the car is that it's pretty expensive for a range of less than 300 miles at normal highway speeds. Or, if you are driving in Montana, Texas or parts of Florida, 70 mph is slow.

[@traviscalvin431]

X Plaid is pricy but is intended for people that want ultimate acceleration. If that's not your thing, get a standard X and save the money. I would love to have the acceleration but I wouldn't be willing to pay the extra personally.

[@zachkane7378]

It's great to see Jordan getting excited about making videos again. IDK if he will ever not be the guy who crashed the S Plaid.

[@Jordan_Schiefer]

I’m extra careful around Plaids now.

[@slyguyaction]

We have the exact same car (except we have the yoke) and we love every bit of it. Been waiting for this video!! Thanks Jordan and OofS!!

[@skblut]

Thanks for the continuing informative videos!

[@lukenowlandfilms]

Kyle, I want you to know that Jordan’s “cinematography” is what kept me watching this video. I read the title and had every intention of skipping right to the end to see what happened with the below zero testing, but then I was distracted by the shots and never skipped.

[@Iangamebr]

I know you guys are based on Colorado, but I wish there were someone like you guys doing range testing in a coastal city, that has a loop with elevation change of 500 meters loss and gain, to see true range test (majority of humans are at sea level) + see efficiency of both the drive train overall and the regen braking.

[@maryannrondinella5680]

Tom Malodny (I probably just butchered his name) of State of Charge does range tests in New Jersey where he lives, He also does informative product testing of EVSE, that is, chargers for EVs, especially for home use.

[@scdi12]

I didn't know the the EPA uses 70mph for estimates. New to me. I have a 2022 X Plaid and just got back from a 3200 mile drive and it use 360 wh/mile. However much of this was at 77-80+ mph and a considerable distance through rain and high wind, although some was with the wind. Plenty of range as far as I"m concerned, because after 150-200 miles I've gotta get out and stretch as well as pee. So many Tesla superchargers along the way it was no problem finding a fast version 3 and get 250 kW each time. We always had enough (150-200) added miles by the time we returned to the car from the bathrooms. BTW the X front doors close and open without touching if you like. They are only a bother if you don't know how they work. For example, get in sit down and when you hit the brake the door will close. In the settings you can choose how and when doors open.

[@jackyha9445]

Wow that's amazing, you're recording outside with no wind noise, either no wind that day or ya'll got some nice fluffy mics? Super cool

[@hacob2004]

The "Hello, Potter" was a nice touch lol

[@Cjdergrosse]

As a former Tesla owner, not surprised it didnt reach its stated range. Mine didn't, and I havent met anyone in real life that has, they need to ban the 5-cycle test, and only do the 2(?) cycle that Porsche and other conservative automakers use. 70-75mph at a certain temp would be more consistent than city/freeway driving. There are major efficiency gains in city driving, just show the worst-case scenario on the sticker. Porsche Taycan says ~200mi but easily hits 240 at freeway speeds.

[@burnx45]

What vehicle do you own now?

[@Cjdergrosse]

@@burnx45 I have a Rivian R1T

[@evkx]

Awsome production quality and great test

[@NormalShock]

yes, please, been waiting for X Plaid videos!

[@The1andonlyBYack]

That’s one hell of a color combo. I think this is what I’d order if I was getting a new X. I did white on white for my Model S before they had ultra red. If I go Plaid next, I’m going ultra red with white seats.

[@tazeat]

They let you drive a plaid again?

[@loriallen67]

😂😂😂

[@herguth]

I believe there's a bunny ranch, with the same name as the charging station.😉

[@scottbreseke716]

Would make for an interesting rodeo. 🐰

[@Berretotube]

Exquisite car, and great range test - thanks Jordan!

[@CoRektOh]

Jordan is a great presenter.

[@dandaigle4546]

absolutely loved the overhead view, beautiful car

[@PJWey]

What a beautiful sky entering Wyoming.

[@andyfeimsternfei8408]

55k miles on my 2023 MX Plaid, and I have averaged 332wh/mile.

[@RIPPERTON]

I love Math. 420v x 60A = 25kW 320v x 78A = 25kW 25kW being the approx power required to move the car along flat ground at 71mph. Difference in controller current draw between full battery voltage and empty battery voltage is 60A to 78A. Reason why battery energy is consumed faster near bottom of charge.

[@jpscharged]

No. Crusing at speed, the model X is only using less than 20hp to maintain highway speeds. Low battery doesn't impact watt/per mile. Gas boys just keep making up problems...

[@TheRams342000]

What did it cost to re-charge?

[@americanrambler4972]

At $100,000 +/-, I won’t be buying a 2323 Tesla Model X anytime soon. But the 280 ish freeway mile range for me is plenty for any use I would ever put the car through. I like then rend color and white interior. I went for a ride in the back seat of a Model 3 Tesla about a week ago. I enjoyed the experience, but I was disappointed in the car. It was very loud inside with a ton of road noise and the door opening was very low. To get in and out, it was a remove head at the shoulders experience to get in and out and the opening between the seat and the B pillar post was too short for my foot to clear. My 2013 Prius Persona hatchback is actually quieter and easier to get into and out of the back than the model 3. I now see what the Model Y out sells the Model 3. My takeaway was, as a car to ride in, my Prius is more comfortable. And a better fit. But it is not even on the same planet as far as driveline performance is concerned. I hope to ride in more battery EV’s in the future to see what they are like. I would also like to drive them too. But to end up in my driveway, they have to be the best overall package for my needs and driving enjoyment for the money spent.

[@danimper2517]

0:20 I like the intro! Keep it up!

[@djmouseshadow4735]

I haven’t tried it yet, but I bet maybe the best use case for a Model X is Uber/Lyft… every single ride would be a blast with those falcon doors opening for people. Even if you don’t need the money… I suggest you try it. A black car would have you at the very top ride class too, would be meeting the top people in your area. // Elon should have bought Uber instead of Twitter.

[@rockheadregolith8325]

Clearly this cat LOVES the sound of his voice...

[@Ficon]

The standard Tesla 80-85% of advertised multiplier. Plaids are replacing AMG and M cars in my neighborhood as powerful vehicles driven extremely timidly.

[@rkalla]

Had 2 Teslas and the "Tesla multiplier" is a real thing. One of the reasons I want a 400+ mile Tesla so I can actually get 300 miles.

[@chrisak49]

Middle of winter. The other Model X they ran got 331 miles in middle of summer which was 4 miles off the 335 miles EPA

[@Ficon]

@@chrisak49 50 degrees is hardly middle of winter. Kia EV9 got advertised range. E-Trons got advertised range. Porsches beat advertised range. It’s always Tesla because they game EPA tests. Hence the class action lawsuit.

[@jpscharged]

​@Ficon the EPA hwy test is for 67mph. The other ev makers are underrating compared to EPA hwy testing criteria. Class action lawsuit? Nice try dreamer.

[@Ficon]

@@jpscharged Oh shit. So Tesla loses 20% efficiency by going from 67 to 70 mph? Clown-ass startup.

[@davidws5439]

Dave gave you permission to drive his Plaid X... WOW, don't wreck it 😅 hahaha

[@wesleypulkka7447]

Very honest test!

[@AnOldGuy164]

I thought the interstate speed limit in Colorado was 75. And that makes some difference. The manufacturers provide drag equation coefficients. It would be nice if reviewers compared their results to those provided by the drag equation. But even at 70mph one needs to refuel (charge) every 2 hours to stay in the sweet spot of charging - 20% to 80%. Makes long trips a hassle.

[@RxPharmer]

I dont even plan a stop until I can get down below 10%. That first 40% is crucial for timing and efficiency.

[@reggiebuffat]

A small break every 2 hours is actually quite nice, even in an ice car.

[@mustangdaddy4125]

Here in Florida 70 miles per hour is slow!😮 I set my limit to 75 mph in my Y Performance and cars pass me like I am standing still 😮 I have 19 inch Gemini wheels with continental all season tires averaging 273 to 291 wh/mile traveling from Orlando to Miami which is a 240 mile distance.

[@TechProGabe]

Kum and Go must love you guys

[@rvboondocker2559]

I believe the ideal ambient temperature is 74 Fahrenheit for these batteries.

[@throttlewatch4614]

Logically it makes no sense to me to have a $100,000 car then care about fuel savings ?

[@riceball777]

i also have a model x plaid with 20 inch wheels. With the car fully loaded with my family and kids and driving normal at 75-85mph keeping up with road trip traffic with climate control on i would say real world road trip range is 210-250miles. Realistically range is enough since supercharges are everywhere and the car charges so fast.

[@at0mly]

Hell yeah Taco John's, I could go for some potato oles.

[@drew8256]

Great test. Wondering what speeds the EPA uses for its tests. The drag increases to the square of the increase, and horsepower required to the cube.

[@sorka95032]

The S/X now have the horn in the center for 2024.

[@ethanlinderman8833]

absolutely insane that they didn't put just a summary screen at the end with the data. Tbf, the whole 37 min video could be summarized in a few data graphs. I know that's Out Of Spec's thing, but c'mon at least put a data screen at the end summarizing results!

[@Mobile_Dom]

im form the UK and have heard of 3OH!3, have people not heard of them?

[@nickwill1364]

Commenting to say Yes! I know 3OH!3 🤣

[@EVunedited]

Nice work on the transitions 👍

[@blubaru09]

It’s good to have Jordan back in the mix at OOS. Fun and well shot/ poorly shot videography keeps us engaged.

[@sparkysho-ze7nm]

Shout out to out of specs Dave ur great

[@sparkysho-ze7nm]

Pre 0 : 00 🔥asz ride !!!

[@vincentrobinette1507]

Do Kum & Go charge stations feature NACS, or did you have to use a CCS-NACS adapter? I couldn't help but notice charging a Tesla at a non-Tesla charge point.

[@TylerMarletteNY]

hey Kyle. I love my model Y performance 2022 but the range is starting to become a real hassle especially with towing and winter time. what’s your suggestion for a 60K and under EV (used or new) with more range that can tow 3500lbs. more than 330 epa miles minimum.

[@shaunmwoolley]

PSA- if you cover/hit all the buttons with the palm of your hand on the horn side, it will honk the horn.

[@sorka95032]

Only works for me about half the time on my 2022 MXP.

[@privettoli]

Gorgeous? Looks like steppe to me, I'd prefer to see some trees. I'm glad somebody is testing those vehicles to confirm what the actual range is gonna be in real life conditions (interstate roads, freezing weather, etc).

[@carperdiem8754]

Crazy that yall got close to 330 in the non plaid x vs this...

[@MrGMawson2438]

Cheers Jordan it's great

[@cvrtechcorn]

0 to 100 charging model x video needed

[@onefastdoc]

Nice video. My Model 3 Performance shows 283 miles of range when fully charged but I only get about 230 miles of actual range and that is in warm sunny Southern California weather. Tesla range estimates are terrible. The more important part of the video I think are the four phantom breaking episodes you experienced. I also experienced that on open highways with no traffic which drives me nuts. It is so dangerous when it does that. I’m just lucky that I haven’t been rear-ended yet when that happens. It’s just a lawsuit waiting to happen.

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

The more efficient the cars are at city speeds, the more the EPA average will differ from highway driving only. EPA shows both city and highway MPGe for all EVs and it is that agency that decides how the standards should be measured. Tesla has no choice in the matter.

[@Aztasu]

​@@0ooTheMAXXoo0 Yes, partly true. Manufacturers, like Tesla, can choose between a 2-cycle and a 5-cycle EPA test and the 5-cycle test often produces more realistic numbers due to a wider range of conditions, tho. Manufacturers like KIA, BMW, Mercedes-Benz come very close to their EPA ratings or even beat them. Also a generally efficient car won't have such a big difference between EPA numbers and pure highway tests. The biggest difference is actually in not generally efficient cars, especially SUVs/trucks or small sub-compact cars, they have a sweet spot at lower speeds and fall off a cliff at highway speeds when the electric motor is being pushed outside of its efficiency zone (mostly sub-compact cars with small motors) and when the air-drag becomes more important than the rolling resistance. The reason why KIA EV9, which is actually not crazy efficient, comes close to EPA numbers during the 70mph range test has mostly to do with a more realistic EPA number from the start. Tesla just always overhypes the range and does everything to push numbers for advertisement reasons. Tesla has a choice in the matter

[@lachlanB323]

​@@AztasuThe epa was updated so the new model 3 hits its stated eoa easily

[@OldManse09]

Paddington is missed and needs to go back to Connecticut!

[@scottbreseke716]

Jordan wouldn't be able to bear his absence. 🧸

[@RAH_Holdings]

When will you do the new model 3 range?

[@georgigeorgiev2381]

I know 3OH!3 :) Great video, thanks for sharing! Also would 60 mph match the EPA rating?

[@mrrkrr]

🎵 Streets of Gold album ftw 🎵

[@shahzadiqbal1976]

Amazing video.

[@shaggydogsales]

Why the same old tape harping on no turn style stocks? Takes most people 5 minutes to adjust to new design. I think its easier and safer to use with hands on wheel. Out of spec dave is awesome for lending his beautiful car.

[@Jviera1989]

*carbon fiber interior comes on plaid models, not with white interior

[@drbrowne01]

Great Job!

[@yehmustafa2959]

Jordan, appreciate the work you put into the range test, but please work on your camera setup. It like you never made a KZbin video before

[@zachkane7378]

I thought I heard that the new S and X are starting to get the new wheel?

[@dixikloos5352]

Kempower is the best❤

[@scottmcelhiney323]

IS it? I suspect that Tesla has made way more chargers than Kempower , Tesla has over 6000 charge slocations around the world

[@computertutorials1286]

My guess is around 250 at 70. Edit: What's crazy is that my initial guess was 280, this is why you always go with your gut.

[@Jethr001]

Great objective data! Full presentation with lots of comments…a little long and parts unscripted. How about 20 minutes or a menu so I can skip to results…😊

[@scottmcelhiney323]

I wonder how far it would have gone at 55mph...