Texas weed

Help Out Pack 997
www.givesendgo...
Source: storage.courtl...
************************************************************
✊Support Independent Journalism:
johncrump.loca...
/ johncrump
Cash
App: $realjohncrump
Paypal: paypal.me/johncc
***********************************************************
🤲 Join The Discord: / discord
***********************************************************
🛒Amazon Influencer Store: www.amazon.com...
***********************************************************
My Site: crumpy.com
Live Channel: / johncrumplive
Gaming Channel: / @johncrumpgames

[@boss350z5]

I mean imagine having beer in the fridge and perfectly legal guns and getting felonies for it... its fkn stupid.

[@daviddesrosiers1946]

Shouldn't be a crime whatsoever.

[@GorillasGuns]

There's nothing written in the Second Amendment that says you can't possess, smoke weed, and own guns.

[@Ryan-xq3kl]

The founding fathers had guns and hemp without permission

[@ShooterMcgavin6]

George Washington grew it on Martha’s Vineyard and had guns

[@ShooterMcgavin6]

Judge Patrick Wyrick of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the indictment, ruling that the federal statute banning “unlawful” users of cannabis from possessing firearms violated the Second Amendment.

[@TaylorS9209]

It boggles my mind why you can't enjoy a toke on your couch in the evenings and not be able to defend yourself if some punk wants to home invade..... Wish these TX freedom loving republicans would keep fighting for gun freedoms... but don't turn around and do the same thing the gun control nuts do, just on another subject... Pot, kettle, black.

[@dawudasha977]

Tell that to Unconstitutional Sheriff Chad Bianco in Riverside county who's still denying law abiding citizens like me with FFL, out-of-state CCW's and no criminal history. They just don't like the hue of your skin or you religion then they can arbitrarily deny you based on Subjective Standards. Trust me. I went through it with appeal and all. The tyrant Riverside County Sheriff Department fought me all the way to deny my rights. They are horrible people at Riverside County CCW unit. Very disrespectful.

[@barbless_hook78]

Harmless plant and a tool. Reschedule cannabis and recognize the constitution. Problem solved.

[@williamdurdin1964]

Another way to deny people's rights

[@williamdurdin1964]

Did he get his guns back ?

[@kj3n569]

The judge stated that his decision was specifically based on the circumstances of this particular case. He made clear that his decision was not basis for changing current laws, and would only apply to this defendant. While still a victory for 2A Rights, it is a small one. Now that this ruling has been made, it can be cited in other, similar court cases, but will not guarantee a similar verdict. Still, it is a step in the right direction.

[@radrob5033]

Freedom!

[@ShooterMcgavin6]

Oklahoma ruled on this in the Supreme Court. Said it’s legal

[@Michael-dr9wl]

NYSRPA vs Bruen SCOTUS 2022 ! Text, History, and Tradition! Period!

[@jeremyschewene4914]

WMF!

[@mtnmover7794]

Washington farmed it

[@dawudasha977]

I need an attorney to help me sue Riverside County and California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme. I was denied my CCW after appeal and I'm an FFL, I have an out-of-state CCW, I'm a range safety officer, I'm well trained, no drug or mental health history, and i can buy firearms and pass a NICS background check. I also have a letter from the DOJ and NICS saying i can Buy, possess and carry firearms but since Chad Bianco and his CCW unit didn't like me for whatever reason my right to carry is now infringed based on Arbitrary Rules and Subjective Standards against The Bruen decision and other SCOTUS rulings. I was told my case is a winner but i just need to find an attorney who is willing to start this with me. I asked AI if Riverside County CCW scheme was Unconstitutional. This is what it said....... The key question revolves around whether Riverside County’s CCW scheme complies with constitutional standards post-Bruen. The Supreme Court emphasized that rights protected by the Second Amendment should not require individuals to demonstrate special needs or burdensome criteria imposed by state or local governments. Good Cause Requirement: The requirement for applicants to show “good cause” is now viewed as overly restrictive and likely unconstitutional based on the precedent set by Bruen. This suggests that any similar requirement in Riverside County would face significant legal challenges. Subjective Criteria: The use of subjective assessments regarding an applicant’s moral character raises further concerns about constitutionality. Legal experts have pointed out that such criteria could lead to arbitrary decisions and discrimination against certain groups of people. Recent Injunctions: The permanent injunction against discouraging non-citizens from applying indicates judicial recognition of broader access rights under the Second Amendment, which may extend to all lawful residents regardless of citizenship status. Given these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that aspects of Riverside County’s CCW scheme are indeed unconstitutional as they conflict with both the spirit and letter of recent Supreme Court rulings regarding gun rights. Conclusion Based on these considerations, the Riverside County CCW scheme is likely unconstitutional, particularly concerning its previous requirements for demonstrating good cause and other subjective assessments related to moral character. That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some me issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes. Why waste time and money trying to overturn magazine bans when the real issue is CRPA is in bed with CCW issuing agencies like Chad Bianco and Riverside County Sheriff Department and will not sue California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme. Why? Because too many people are making too much money selling our rights at a price. I know. I reached out to CRPA and Michele and associates and they did not care that me and other people in Riverside County were getting denied their CCW. They told me and I have the email for proof where CRPA said they have a close relationship with Chad Bianco and his CCW unit and they will not be able to help us. Why would we as Riverside County residents and Riverside County chapter members continue to Pay dues, donate and volunteer when CRPA would not even bother to help it's members from an unconstitutional Sheriff like Chad Bianco and his CCW unit?! That's the truth about CRPA. They will not take action unless they can make money and grift off it's members.

[@aaron9129]

It's actually two things text history and tradition. As in the history of the text and tradition. Mark Smith dose a nice job of breaking that down.

[@jcnikoley]

The law making it illegal to be in possession of a firearm if you use marijuana is unconstitutional. That said, he could have been charged with perjury for lying on the 4473. Unfortunately, there’s no 2nd Amendment defense in that case.

[@YesMan702]

Could make the case that you were not using it when you filled out the form

[@jasoncolson3100]

While he said that he had smoked weed every day since he was 14, he could have purchased it from a local private party, so no 4473 required.

[@enchentez]

IS THIS NOW PRECEDENT FOR EVERYONE IN THE 5TH CIRCUIT?

[@wbfos]

Bumpies

[@ConstitutionalPatriot]

But just as important, does he get his guns and weed back???

[@jrmotorsports55]

Freedom!