The biggest PROBLEM with superhero movies

[@Garagelab164]

Deadpool: They’re gonna make him do this until he’s 90.

[@LukeLovesRose]

I would love that. Hugh has never felt more like Wolverine than he did in Deadpool & Wolverine. And he's bringing the same A game that he brought to Logan. We now have a great actor giving us an Oscar caliber performance as Wolverine

[@motor4X4kombat]

​@@LukeLovesRoseuntil they went full kingdom of the kristal skull/dial of destiny with him. Older=/=better

[@LukeLovesRose]

@@motor4X4kombat Who? James Mangold?

[@motor4X4kombat]

@@LukeLovesRose jackman have like 45 when he did logan (plus some make up) he didn't literally have 70 or 80 like Harrison Ford.

[@LukeLovesRose]

@@motor4X4kombat He was not like Harrison Ford as an old Indie. In one freaking movie, Hugh Jackman and Ryan Reynolds gave us TWO of the best fight scenes I've seen in the MCU.

[@Kalel2.0]

This honestly exactly why a lot fans would need to get used to soft or even hard reboots within a live action context as its easy to get away with not aging up a character within comics and animated shows. They are gonna have to be recasted with younger and less expensive actors if they wanna tell more stories with certain characters

[@mrheadcannon]

This usually doesn't happen because there are not many shared universes that actually work besides the MCU. Marvel would be the first important live-action universe to make a reboot in Secret Wars (IF they do it).

[@Kalel2.0]

@@mrheadcannon Your right the MCU minus to some extent the Monsterverse are really the only franchise to have actually maintained a cinematic universe structure for almost 16 years and I think theyll probably soft reboot after Secret Wars especially with how many leakers have confirmed it may happen and it makes sense especially if they want the next generation of fans to have jumping on point to get into without being shackled to previous MCU continuity(Although will probably be acknowledged just not mandatory viewing)

[@TheReeelBradPitt]

This normally wasn’t a problem before everyone started doing big interconnected cinematic universes. If a series lasted longer than a trilogy of movies, they usually ended up alienating everyone. Very few franchises could get away with so many sequels. Spider man got rebooted three-ish times before mcu Spider-Man

[@HobNob-tr1nm]

@@mrheadcannon A hard reboot would never work in my opinion because if any film isn't reviewed to be much better than the orginal, it wont do well. Each film will be held to the expectation of its MCU equivalent. Honestly Marvel has enough characters that they dont need to reboot, they should let characters retire without replacing them with a side character.

[@Sjono]

Not to mention in certain cases when the actor gets into trouble or dies, they take the character with them. Look how Marvel discarded Black Panther and Kang

[@redram6080]

They could and should recast but they won't

[@riderchallenge4250]

Black Panther is title. We can see T chlla's son in the next movie.

[@luismedrano6680]

​@@riderchallenge4250Indeed, and before Tchalla it was Tchaka, and before that Azzuri and so on and so on, til the 1st black panther, Bashenga

[@retrokoh]

Which is odd because they recast Hulk and Rhodey... and NEVER acknowledged it.

[@Sjono]

@@riderchallenge4250 Do you realize how ridiculous that statement is? T’Challa Jr is no replacement for T’Challa. Not only are they different characters with different relationships with other characters in MCU, they’re obviously of a different generation By the time T’Challa Jr grows up everyone else in the MCU would be way older and aged out

[@eshaneshan4857]

The Cavil Wolverine cameo might be a sign that fans won’t mind a new actor taking up the role

[@mrheadcannon]

It was well received, sure, but it was JUST a cameo. I don't think there's any chance of that happening (not that I won't like it).

[@LukeLovesRose]

Yeah. You'll accept hammy crap after an Oscar worthy performance as Wolverine.. like we got in Logan

[@fraserr851]

No they will not like it they had Hugh for 24 years as wolverine and if we get idk henry cavil as the wolverine it won’t be the same yes if Henry cavil was casted as wolverine back in the first x men film we would be the same

[@Goofyloofy1]

@@mrheadcannonthey might be testing the water to see how fans react, Ryan made hugh to come back to wolverine role. Probably after the reboot we can see henry.

[@split88]

Then they gonna make him wolverine till he's 90😅

[@fastneuro9829]

Hue Jackman will play wolverine until he’s 90

[@deadscene1]

hes gonna be atleast in a few more movies 100 %

[@noobmaster69426]

Here’s how I’d improve superhero movies: - fresh storytelling - balance nostalgia with good quality (Hollywood has been having a nostalgia addiction since 2021) - balance humor with seriousness (they’ve been having a joke problem since 2021 or 2022) - don’t murder your vfx workers - focus on making new good content rather than always relying on the past. You can still respect the past’s legacy. - don’t undercut stakes from the past or the future

[@Hello-bi1pm]

Hollywood had nostalgia addiction since it was founded 😂 not 2021

[@noobmaster69426]

@@Hello-bi1pm I’m just saying from what I’m noticing.

[@johnes2337]

I'd say the nostalgia addiction sparked in 2015 with Disney's Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

[@noobmaster69426]

@@johnes2337 yeah. 2015 was when Disney killed Star Wars. And yk whats crazy? Marvel’s Infinity Saga, since 2009, had been distributed by Disney, so they were also responsible for their successes. Pretty much bc Disney was on a leash for Marvel and in 2021, they cut the mouse loose.

[@C1K450]

I definitely agree with the balance of humor and seriousness in a story. People gets bored of a movie too serious and people think that the goal of the story isn’t taken as seriously because of the joke. Humor and serious storytelling compliments each other and will create character development and bonding between the cast and dialogue.

[@joseluis5055]

That was my main problem with the Fantastic 4 casting. We need actors who could play the characters for at least a decade if they wanted to

[@majormarketing6552]

We? You mean the guys trying to profit

[@Kalel2.0]

@@joseluis5055 Vanessa Kirby and Joseph Quinn are kind of the right ages and I could see them playing Sue and Johnny for the next decade

[@theepicwolfnetwork5220]

I agree, same with the Red Hulk recast. I thought it was stupid to hire someone older than the original actor

[@gf1006]

@@theepicwolfnetwork5220especially since harrison ford won’t return to a film for less than a trillion dollars

[@katokianimation]

Yes we need 30 years old people who could look 30 in their 40s. Then reboot the whole franchise in every 10-15 years.

[@chandelight59]

Doctor doom won't be a Stark Variant. They made it clear by saying Victor Von Doom, not Tony Stark.

[@MrWarrenRB]

Correct. But clowns keep saying he's a" stark variant" because they don't know how to listen. He's Victor Von Doom, not Tony Stark.

[@thomasakman4209]

waht if tony stark was always a Victor Von Doom Variant?

[@chandelight59]

@@thomasakman4209 Respectfully. That is some of the dumbest logic I have ever seen, I can't tell if you're rage baiting but, shut up!

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

I mean Doctor Doom is always with the mask in the comics and rarely with a face. All RDJ needs to do is keep his mask ON. There you go Doctor Doom is back in MCU.

[@theepicwolfnetwork5220]

@@MrWarrenRBHe’s played by the same actor. Both having influence and big roles. He’s just a Stark variant with Dr. Doom’s surname

[@forgedude]

That Superhero physique including Huge's comes from a carefully monitored PED routine and in the long run, it does take a toll. Hemsworth is not the first to refuse it going further. Tom Hardy also did the same for playing Bane and later said he wouldn't be doing that and that is facing health issues because of that. Robert Pattison refused to beef up for his Batman b/c he didn't want to take part in steroid culture & there is also a principle involved that this is an unrealistic and harmful body image standard that Hollywood sets forth.

[@deadpan666true]

2:20 It isn’t 32 years…it’s 24! Stop adding years..I feel old enough! Also, Weasely Snipes!?!?

[@KingMonkeyMon]

Yeah i was gonna say the same thing the first X-men Movie came out when I was 11 and im now almost 36 😅

[@CertifiedOwner]

Maybe he was referring to his age at that time which was 31 or 32 I think

[@LadyVA0422]

@@KingMonkeyMonright. I was like hold up I’m only 37 and I know I was watching X-men in my early teens lol

[@Pointed_expression]

Same goes for dafoe and molina . Its time for new mcu versions of otto and norman.

[@AR-UNKNOWN]

don’t forget that we also age

[@MarksWorkshopcrft]

Or maybe not wait 20 years to show a comic accurate wolverine since his live action debut.

[@spudymun2580]

People didn't hate Affleck because he was the replacement. They hated him because of the terrible Daredevil movie. When BvS came out a lot of people loved the actor as Batman but didn't like the fact that Batman was killing people and this is the problem of the script. The same thing with Pattinson, people hated him because of the twilight and fell in love at the moment the film came out. Almost a billion dollars box office in post-covid era and this is not some multiverse nostalgic movie. TASM had a lot of good reviews, and the second one got a lot of hate because it was a shitty film. Not because Andrew replaced Tobey. Yes, a lot of fans have compared them, but TASM films are just worse than Raimi films in some things. And we can't say anything about the new Superman, 'cause it haven't came out yet. All this complaining about replacement is just noise, we need to see the results of James Gunn's work. This type of hatred isn't permanent at all. If an actor and a movie are good, no one will keep complaining about replacement after the release. Some folks may, but it won't affect the box office and sequels.

[@Snikit]

You know… Comic Book multiverse stories prepared me for these kinds of changes years ago. I’m not so bothered by the changes, provided the acting and story is strong. ✨✅✨

[@IamBenji98]

AND This is A BIG Problem to the Comicbooks. none of the heroes really age. But with the movies you can grow with them better and the characters become more adult

[@canebatman0]

You can't compare comics with movies, they are 2 infinitely different worlds even if it doesn't seem like it, both have their benefits and defects, then the writers would decide to make a comic series in where their characters getting old, because there they are all separate worlds and that's the cool thing about comics, you have infinite worlds with infinite ideas

[@randallross420]

"I get older, they stay the same age"

[@AsgersWeb]

This is something that sucks in the comics, that they refuse to let them age even a little bit. DC have finally stopped doing that bs by allowing Batman to be 45-50

[@cinderefell1399]

Terminator has this problem. That said, Hugh Jackman is probably the only person I would want as Wolverine.

[@DJ_Force]

Terminator sequels have lots of problems, Arnold's age is the least of them.

[@Sjono]

7:50 Weasley Snipes?

[@BRICKOMEDIA]

Lmao

[@ChrisDeVarro]

Lol 😂 ikr

[@likeadino8580]

The harry potter crossover we never deserved

[@GONEMOVEMENT410]

😂😂😂😂

[@mfmfg9957]

The biggest problem with replacing actors has also to do with actors themselves: they demand a lot of screentime with masks/costumes off. Whereas comics and cartoons mostly do the opposite. If any universe could comit to exposing actors as little as possible, recasts would work much better. I understand origin stories and some character moments need the human face to work better, but I dont know, giving more time to the costume would help me easy in to new people on the role

[@slayerbrother5779]

People can't accept Change but Change is inevitable

[@jmg9509]

Not that they can’t, but that they don’t want to.

[@noahknight4039]

The whole point of the multiverse and Secret Wars is the huge reboot afterwards. The MCU saw this as an issue years ago, everyone else is just catching up.

[@Galaktika113]

X-men soft reboot with First Class exist, and as I see it, people want to see McAvoy's Charles and Fassbender's Magneto as much as Patrick Stewart's and Ian McKellen's version, I would even say McAvoy's and Fassbender's versions more desiring for people as main version then Stewart's and McKellen's. And I think it's happened because of the days of future past, personally, film made me see different actors as one single version of the character (scene with 2 Charles in particular). And as McAvoy and Fassbender became older they became fit for older Charles and Magneto.

[@shellamuchtar3661]

It can be rebooted as long as they wait long enough. The problem is, everyone just want to keep redo-ing that few characters, and didnt give other characters any chance

[@EstudiosCamilo-om4zu]

Yo al ver a criticas cronicas en su nuevo canal: Im gonna put some dirt in your eye

[@Andrew-Bastin]

This really isn’t as big of an issue as you’re making it out to be, sure aging actors is a limitation but one that the movie can take advantage of. One of the main complaints about comic books is stagnation and always reverting back to the status quo, this wouldn’t be an issue for the movies and if they put the right amount of focus and care when crafting the characters they could prop up the legacy characters in popularity, characters like X-23 and Miles Morales have proven very popular and depending how Brave New World turns out we could have a new Captain America that stays true to the character. It’s more work but it can be done.

[@spider-jonah-man7148]

What happens once miles morales gets old? Spider-Man 2099? No they should just recast the character so real fans can get more stories with their favorite character. I love miles and Miguel by the way but why not have movies for all three? Just recast Tom when he’s too old

[@Andrew-Bastin]

@@spider-jonah-man7148 you’re talking about something that’s going to happen for decades, outside of a small handful most of the actors are young and healthy enough to play their characters for at least another decade or two if they wish.

[@spider-jonah-man7148]

@@Andrew-Bastin why wait to replace them when time comes tho? when we can have more stories with the originals which people want and have the successor characters at the same time?

[@Andrew-Bastin]

@@spider-jonah-man7148 why replace them when it’s completely unnecessary?

[@spider-jonah-man7148]

@@Andrew-Bastin cause we want more stories with Wolverine, cap and Ironman

[@mariannerichard1321]

Although I would say characters like Wolverine are less problematic in that field, as they are older than the oldest recorded human already. It's easier to just pretend there's something wrong with their regeneration, compare to a Spiderman who is young no matter who you want to spin it. Edit: Talking of Wolverine, you could say the Worst one had a problem in his timeline, while casting a new one for another timeline who is will take over with a new team of fresher X-men.

[@JamesHowlett-qy3yq]

In case of tobey,the "many" is probably 80%😅

[@mrheadcannon]

I met lots of people who say Andrew is their favorite Spiderman, mainly those under 25 or so. Even so, Tobey still dominates in all the polls about who is the best live action Spider-Man.

[@JamesHowlett-qy3yq]

@@mrheadcannon i am 25, still have to say tobey is my spiderman. I like Andrew a lot too. Specially outside USA,tobeys movies introduced people with spiderman.

[@autavianfields7284]

Too be fair Peter is only like 16 so it’s not unrealistic to see him at 26-30 still looking basically the same having a baby face

[@jumbojoe3030]

Maybe to some extent. Tom is fortunate to get a head start as a young version of Peter and have a whole trilogy and other appearances while still being in his 20s. But he’s now caught up to Tobey and Andrew at this stage of their careers. All three actors have played a 17 year old Peter Parker. For Andrew, he was 27 in TASM. For Tobey, he was 26 in Spider-Man. For Tom, he was 24 in No Way Home. In his next film, Tom’s Peter will be a college student. For reference, Tobey was 28 in Spider-Man 2. Tom is currently 28 and the next Spider-Man movie is nowhere in sight.

[@jumbojoe3030]

Needless to say, some people laughed at that one scene in Spider-Man 2 where a bystander looks at 28 year old Tobey maguire, playing a college student, and said “he’s just a kid. No older than my son.” Well, Tom Holland can finally share the same fate as him.

[@theepicwolfnetwork5220]

In the ultimate universe, he literally dies at 16 😭 Bro was only canonically Spiderman for one year

[@showingYOUtheworld]

The biggest problem is actually twofold: Absolute incompetence by the movie directors regarding the superhero universe + a total lack of imagination ! Add to that CGI effects made by people who clearly have never been to school and to them, the basic laws of physics are something completely incomprehensible 🤦‍♂️ These are the biggest problems with superhero movies !!!......for me personally

[@lennoxwilliamsart7387]

"if the stories are good" exactly. and at the moment this seeeems ... like a pretty hard task ._. back in the days I too was one of those who were like "this this and this has to be accurate or it cannot be good", but today I think an actor has to be believable in a role that's all :D (not very specific I know)

[@MusicLover-my6fo]

I like the points you made, and I've felt the same way about it ever since Marvel announced that Pedro Pascal would be Mister Fantastic in the MCU despite John Krasinski already being in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and being in a huge fancast for the role since 2019. When Robert Downey Jr. first became Iron Man, he was 41and Marvel got 11 initial years out of his performance. I say that because Pedro Pascal will be 50 by the time Fantastic Four First Steps releases, and should he be around as long as RDJ was, he'll be either 59 or 60 by the time his contract ends. I still think Marvel should've chosen John Krasinski since he's still younger.

[@randomprotag9329]

this is a good example of animation being better for longer stuff. animation is not forced to age characters to keep using them or not use a character if the actor is not usable.

[@TheDrexLord]

Honestly I think they best way to go about it just do what James Bind does. Just recast and don't acknowledge it.

[@plasticweapon]

he's not too old. take a look at him. age is a number until it catches up with your body. now, he was too YOUNG when they first cast him, but that's water under the bridge...

[@user-im5kr1hy5q]

The problem is how long production takes, so they can have as many characters as they do with no effect. Where as in movies adding so many characters leaves less time for each character

[@xaeathepro186]

People should use AI to make actors eternally a set age, so when they get old they can replace their old face with their younger face, or even when another actor replace them they could use the AI face to continue the movies

[@wallygator92]

You are 100% right.

[@marveledizz]

All of this is so true. I really want to welcome such changes with open arms, I mean it really only makes sense to do so, but as much as i try to welcome a change in actor it just doesn't work for me

[@teddybear8348]

Then you not really try

[@Monkey1990100]

this is why fans need to get used to a soft or hard reboot because some actors cannot play their live action counterparts forever and need to get younger actors. this is also why i am worried about harrison ford playing red hulk in cp abnw and pedro pascal playing mister fantastic in fantastic four because both of them are supposed to be in their 20s not in their mid 80s or about to turn 60. also why don't you have more subs? i just discovered this channel a few days ago and you provide very informative videos

[@thetoondevil]

I don't know if im in the minority, but i miss the days when we can have a story begin and eventually end. I understand why people want their favorite characters adventure continues. But sometimes, its just more satisfying for a story to end.

[@Alpha121198]

The attachment to actors playing specific characters is both a good and bad thing in my eyes. The worst case of that attachment going too far in recent memory was probably Chadwick Boseman’s tragic death leading to T’challa getting axed in the movies. Boseman was a perfect fit for the role, I will never deny that, but killing the character he played has always left a bitter taste in my mouth. I remember getting yelled at on Twitter for expressing my wish to see a recasting of the historic role. Boseman’s T’challa still had a story to be told, whereas I would say Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine(s) is basically doing a victory lap right now. I was on a tangent again wasn’t I?

[@vlenstudios5388]

Dock Ock in Spider Man No Way Home was too Old but Sony Using de aging Effect for less age, and This present time actually getting works at digital ages

[@Neutral_1zed]

becauss the point of the story isn’t about aging, there are many stories in graphic novel format which can and probably has tackle aging

[@Duckyboy]

Tbh i like That The actors Get older bacuase then The directors Can make The charocter age and Get wiser over time , lock at spiderman for exsample

[@canebatman0]

This thing is good until the actors are too old to continue playing the character

[@Duckyboy]

@@canebatman0 yh

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

​@@canebatman0And if they're too old to play the character then let the character die in some way and then let a legacy character replace him and not just comic book shenanigans where the characters can never die.

[@canebatman0]

@@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh In reality in the comics the Avengers always change, the problem in movies is that the people who replace the old characters are not famous, they are presented badly and then obviously they don't have a good story,a lot of people complain about the fact that there are too many women, I don't think that's the problem, if a female character is done well it's a good character (as happened with Black Widow)

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

@@canebatman0 Well yea that's why the character should die instead of the character being reverted to the status quo like in comics. Is just better and more engaging when you know the characters CAN DIE instead of rebooting them to death It's just worse. That's why legacy characters like Wally West work because Barry litteraly died in comics until decades later brought him back for no reason. If they want to make the characters with new actors then let them be an alternative universe instead of leading the character from a previous actor. Tom Holland as a continuation of Andrew Garfield just dosen't make sense, same for Andrew and Tobey that's why they are an alternative universe instead of the same Spider-Man in a universe.

[@emptyazurite5972]

Hugh would be old but damn, that saving universe part

[@briandaleske5139]

People in charge of the entertainment industry, should realize by now, that actors & actresses age, even though their characters barely age. That is why it’s important to have, new actors & actresses, to play different versions of known characters, for movies, and for shows. But the ones picked, to play the characters, must have the talent, to be able to succeed, in playing that role. In addition i think those actors, and actresses, must be able to get along with others, this way no problems could develop.

[@mistercard3599]

Except it really doesn’t happen in the comics, at least not Marvel. Why is everyone so convinced Marvel reboot like DC does? Marvel is living in the same timeline. It began in the 60s. The real solution is for fans to grow the fuck up already. I personally have no problem, compartmentalizing the various incarnations of these characters across the years. I would personally have no problem if they just recast people what a specific actor gets too old to play the part. We wouldn’t need some stupid Multiverse explanation, I am a grown man and I can tell when a new actor is playing a character.

[@Arnsteel634]

The good thing is Wolverine was always drawn old. At least in the 20th century. Haven’t read much this century

[@pace1195]

8:46 "If the stories are good, people will accept the changes over time." Exactly, different artists draw the comics or animate the cartoons. Each has their own spin on the set of characters. The same can be done in the movies. Marvel just needs time for two reasons. One, audiences need to know the old actors are no longer going to play that character again. This happens in all actor centric mediums including long-running Broadway plays and even in tv shows sometimes. An actor too far away from the believable age range shouldn't get cast again. The second reason is for the studios to take the time to come up with good, compelling stories. They need to quit throwing bad to terrible content out ASAP like wet spaghetti hoping something sticks. Put out a good story, get an actor who fits the ambiance of the script, and the audience will accept that actor/director/artists with accolades.

[@Grumpyskater]

It’s like Hue said in an interview, Hue can’t play a wizard but Daniel Radcliffe can play a Wolverine… makes me wonder if Daniel is a real consideration by hue

[@inshaalarieh5542]

Why are your videos addictive 😭😭😭😭

[@mrheadcannon]

I'll take that as a compliment 😅

[@HonestSports]

They should’ve recast T’Challa, he was in like 2 movies

[@theoshachi]

lol I think you mean 4 (Civil war, Black Panther, infinity war, Endgame) And he made more appearances/cameos in other movies. Also is there even a point of re casting since they’ve already made the second Black panther?..

[@HonestSports]

@@theoshachi he’s hardly in Infinity and endgame. His total screen time is like 70 minutes being generous including all movies

[@alvinpainap8102]

3:14 Exactly 😭 how can fans move on without him.

[@gametrailerz6117]

I surprised you have only 6k subs. Lets make it higher.

[@SimoneSaviolo]

Dave Bautista said he isn't going to play Drax anymore, and it's partly because he's 55 and he has a hard time maintaining his body fit like Drax.

[@Henry_Martin]

4:46 in the comics doctor doom became iron man so its a possibility but an improbabillity.

[@teddybear8348]

It not canon

[@hubson1443]

That is why i respect Robert Pattinson for his physique in The Batman - it's still good and athletic, but realistic, obtainable and didn't require him to go through torture and crazy training. I think that's the main thing that needs changing - all these actors look like they are chiseled in a marble and they push their bodies, dehydrate and torture themselves just for a few shirtless scenes. Don't get me wrong, obviously actors need to look similar to their comic counterparts, but there's a realistic limit to body that doesn't apply to comics.

[@TappingCSGO]

Cavil gonna be the new wolverine like shown in deadpool 3

[@Asriel_Cypher]

It's kinda why I wouldn't mind if they decide to animate the entire story or whatever in Animation form, with the same style as What IF series. Since they would just need their voice. If not, imitators. We just need the right actors.

[@RORCHACH478]

Totally agree bout BatFleck. His solo movie is an ideal Batman movie. Manganiello as Deathstroke is a dreamcast

[@bill_lab_bill4941]

Its not just ageing some actors get into trouble like Ezra and have to be replaced as well so many problems with the real world actors

[@BrontoSmilodon1]

You're forgetting the specific layer of people who are ok with one to a few specific replacements for a booted character. Like people who complained that John Krasinki wouldn't be the MCU Mr. Fantastic

[@srksii]

Bigger problem than aging is actually death of movie stars. There are no new stars to inherit old ones! People are fine with Caval acting as superman, but you need new star for when he get old

[@EditsDiety]

A true marvel fan who watched the rise and peak of mcu will never be able to accept it their mind would just say no and marvel could die

[@Richxwolf]

Bro u deserve wayyy more subs than 2k ! Binge hella of your and as a marvel / dc fan they are good asf. Keep the grinding bro !

[@dw7704]

I have stopped reading a comic when they changed artists, but it’s when the new artist is terrible

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

Idk there is multiple good artists out there but the stories just aren't the same. Is always characters back in they're status quo and never grow up. THAT'S THE REAL ISSUE. Artists have been carrying the comics since decades now, rarely are good stories in the new mainstream comic books.

[@dw7704]

@@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh that’s not at all what I was referring to. I am referring to a change in artist, where the new artist is not good, and so even if the writing is good, the comic is no longer enjoyable. Comics are partly visual art, partly writing. A beautifully drawn, but poorly written comic can be enjoyable to look at, but a poorly drawn/well written one is not enjoyable to read.

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

@@dw7704 Sp you're telling me a good Spider-Man comic is a Sins to the Past comic?? The art is good but the story is just 🤮. Look at the new ultimate Spider-Man the art is amazing and the story is good too but that is a rare case. Art isn't even the main issue the stories are. Even the Batman comics look good but most of them are garbage like the Gotham civil war. Avengers vs Xmen has good art but the story dosen't make sense is bad. Zeb Wells Spider-Man comic art is atcually decent but the story is garbage. So yea they are comics with great art out there is just that the story's are mostly garbage in the new mainstream comics media.

[@dw7704]

@@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh did you even read what I wrote? You missed the point, and are complicating a simple opinion and point.

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

@@dw7704 You litteraly said that a beautiful drawn but a poorly written comic is more enjoyable to look at rather than a better written comic but with bad art is not enjoyable to read. So you simply only like the comic based on art more than the story and you are implying that there are not good artists in the new media on comics wich is not true.

[@mrbushido56]

Loki n thor are the worst ones. Beings that live thousands of years yet thor n loki aged nearly 2 decades in 2 decades

[@haiderraad468]

As you said people will accept the recasts eventually because these actors won't be able to play their role forever and i believe that's why characters like madame web , aunt may and agatha are being played by a young actors compare to the actual character's age , however people must know that secret wars is the last time we will see a lot of faces in their roles

[@Kalel2.0]

@@haiderraad468 It really depends tho a lot of comic book fans and people with an understanding of comics and the characters in general would mostly accept a recast but most casual and general audience members may not be as receptive towards it

[@aceven2raa]

Superhero movies should learn from the James Bond franchise. Different actors doing their own, unique takes on the titular character and all great in their own way and beloved by the fandom.

[@KentPetersonmoney]

I don't got a problem with the characters aging. It makes them more relatable. Heroes in my stories do age.

[@runisa]

I’m glad Cavill isn’t Superman anymore. 2 and half movies wasn’t enough to make me feel a connection to his Superman, nothing against the actor though.

[@Kalel2.0]

@@runisa I agree Cavill is an amazing actor and the writing did him no favors whatsoever but man his Superman was just not it and you know it's when the majority people didnt feel anything when he died in BVS

[@runisa]

@@Kalel2.0 that’s true, that argument should be brought up more.

[@hubson1443]

He was perfect for the role, it's just that the WB wasn't perfect at executing the DC universe, Superman should've never been killed in his 2nd movie appearance lmao

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

​@@hubson1443 Yea the actor was perfect but his writing in the movies sucked.

[@LadyVA0422]

If Liam Neeson can still be making action movies they better keep Hugh Jackman as wolverine til he’s 90😩🤣

[@enzofanfics9897]

Deepfake would be a solution, but people would still complain.

[@aguy4326]

the flash movie has taught me that no, it is definitely not a solution.

[@TJBowman-vr1co]

It' more of a problem with superhero comics, not really the movies. I think Judge Dread is the only exception.

[@MrCesar90403]

That "chicken and rice diet" is hard to keep up with. 😅

[@cesarayala8665]

Tom Holland's hates started liking him when they saw his character suffering. That says about our society.

[@bustermorley8318]

Nobody really complains when you replace Batman or the Joker. I don't even think Superman will be that big an issue. The problem with the MCU is that it is the MCU. I don't think you need a connected universe, My favourite Supehero movie were the Christopher Nolan Batman movies and they had no connction to an expanded universe. If I were Marvel I would just do an Xmen reboot with new actors. Forget the rest of the MCU. You can reboot that in ten years or so with completely new actors.

[@99Gara99]

Young Hugh Jackman was already a horrible depiction of wolverine. Tbh, this old hugh jackman is slightly better. Wolverine was never a gallant.

[@JamesHowlett-qy3yq]

I dont think so. He looks so identical to the source material,which is clint eastwood

[@MR-rj2qw]

AI and CGI are now good enough to put anyone‘s voice and face on a stand-in. If one does not want to do that, it can at least be used to age the actual actor down a few years. Hell, it SHOULD be used to spare them destroying their bodies with brutal training and steroids to achieve a certain physique for just a movie. It is almost like sophisticated makeup, so if Jackman wants to play Wolverine until he is 90, maybe he can 😂.

[@HereJune]

Yeah, jensen ackles can NOT be the new batman

[@teddybear8348]

I would dissagree about that

[@Vegeta-kakarot-q4k]

Dude the wolverine actor was alright, I dont see anything wrong with with him

[@juanaguirre3702]

They don't have to keep reusing the same characters... theres so many great stories with lesser known characters

[@fearthefro5045]

7:51 🤔👂🏾“…Wezley Snipes…” is crazy 😅😂.

[@JordanLace-n8f]

Really it’s a problems with Vampire franchise movies n TV shows

[@Yo-nq9ul]

0:13 over saturation of visual effects *shows music production*

[@LeahEniscio]

8:37 His haters disappeared because they don’t know who peter parker is

[@lifewithhonordiewithglory1835]

He wasn't too old in deadpool

[@myname1989]

CGI and face filters 🤦🏻‍♂️ Remember the will smith movie where he meets his younger self ? 😎

[@Mailpaper06]

Heck look at Ross, William Hurt passed away from old age so who do they pick as his replacement? A guy in his 80s. We gonna be right back in the same situation soon.

[@ChafiHabila]

Best Spiderman = Andrew Garfield Yup that's us. I can't imagine anyone else other than Hayden Christensen playing Annakin. Best Batman = Christian Bale Best Superman = Henry Cavil Don't ask me how. Know this and know peace.

[@spider-jonah-man7148]

I’m a fan of the characters over the actors. Yea Hugh and RDJ are amazing and will be remembered for years to come, but they are just one interpretation of those characters. They will always be there for a rewatch. I’d prefer to get new stories with the characters I love instead letting them go forever just because an actor ages out.

[@LuarIbriqi-qf4fh]

I mean who else plays Ironman and Wolverine better then these two?? Making a new actor with these characters just dosen't feel right. They were litteraly born for they're roles. Making a character die is wayy better then making characters never age for the status quo. That's the problem with new stream comics nowadays.

[@larilove400]

The thing is Hugh Jackman is actually at the perfect age to play wolverine

[@tangroro]

I don't like old actors in my action films

[@Llama-Lass996]

the next wolverine needs to be Danny DeVito, he is the perfect height for a comic accurate Logan, he is a great actor and would work so well in the role.

[@user-or2eb7mn3u]

I thought endgame was going to be used as a huge recasting marvel heroes not just a killing off of characters

[@user-or2eb7mn3u]

@Vilgax00 well no one cared about the captain marvel comic she's like an even more boring Superman but no recast the actors who would play them once the actors got tired of playing them.

[@APunishedManNamed2]

@Vilgax00 Sony didn't screw Spiderman, Sony just said "fuck off" to Disney because they want a total monopoly over western superhero characters

[@Spiderman.616]

Un momento.... Yo te conozco...

[@icecreamhero2375]

1) They have a billion other heroes they didn't use, 2) Hulk was recast.

[@YakubBlackmann]

Actors age. To more sensational news: The water is wet.