The Most Common Objections to God

[@ShrekGKSPrivacy]

The reason for why evil exists is because God gave us free will. With free will, evil is inevitable.

[@franchescooneto1932]

That says nothing

[@HeinzGuderian-kg1lc]

​@@franchescooneto1932that say literally everything

[@armand9120]

​@@HeinzGuderian-kg1lc no it's a terrible response. Free will does not entail the ability to do evil bcs there are beings like God who presumably have free will but can't do evil. Nothing logically precludes God from not bringing about evil while retaining free will

[@killerbee6484]

​​@@armand9120 There are reasons why the problem of evil is not a good argument Who defines evil you can claim injecting someone with a syringe is evil but it actually the opposite because he injecting a vaccine to save someone life God knows everything so he can cause something we may not see the benefits while it's for the good of us.

[@32Eratosthene51]

​@@HeinzGuderian-kg1lcThe argument is just really flawed but lets assume that for example the op is right. Beside what the comment above me just said (that alone is enough to disprove the op argument) there is another issue For example religious believe that after death they will go to heaven. Either you go to heaven with your free will, so evil is inevitable in the heaven, or you go to heaven but in exchange you lose your free will

[@dabestestgoblin8495]

I'm a Christian who has a lot of respect to the Muslim dedication towards our God, its pretty interesting to finally see a Muslim apolegetics channel who isn't just using the common islamic arguments. Keep it up, its truly refreshing.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Thank your brother - May God guide use to the truth. I want to focus on only very compelling arguments and evidences both for God and also for the truth of Islam/defending arguments against Islam

[@revivec01]

If u are in doubt of Islam I will give u some of the Quran miracles that prove that it's not by some random human being, it's by the Only true God. To enlighten your heart 😇

[@revivec01]

*Bible errors, Quran is the truth:* If the Bible is the truth as you claim, Then Why the bible got errors like callings kings at the time of Joseph pharohs, and the Quran all over chapter of Joseph calls them kings, and we confirm today with heroglyphic writings that Pharohs came after Joseph and they were kings. - Why does the bible say the moon has it's own light, while the Quran says he who created the a shining light and the moon a derived light. Why the Quran has no mistakes while the other books are full of mistakes then?!!

[@revivec01]

*Quran Preservation* Quran 15:9 **Allah kept his promise of preserving the Quran and we can prove that today with carbon dated copies 😇** It is certainly We Who have revealed the Reminder, and it is certainly We Who will preserve it. + Each Quran narration has an authentic chain of narration with biographies of the narrators going all the way to the Prophet Mohammed PBUH *AND YOUR BIBLE HAS ANONYMOUS WRITERS!!*

[@revivec01]

- **Iron Miracle**, Surah/Chapter 57 is in center of the quran (114 Surah's) and Iron is found in the center of the earth, Still not enough? Here go lookup verse 57:25 in arabic. Count the number of words from the start to iron حديد, it's 13 words (half of the number of electrons of iron), then count to the end it's 15 words (half of the number of neutrons) while Chapter iron is half of the number of Chapters (Chapter 57), because Iron is in the center of earth. And is not initially from earth, it's sent down as Allah says. On top of that a research discovered that the depth at which iron is found in (Kilometers which didn't exist back then) is the exact number of verses before that verse. Go lookup iron miracle quran. - **Universe expansion:** Quran 51:47 We built the universe with ˹great˺ might, and We are certainly expanding ˹it˺. This is the Big Bang from 1400 years ago 😅 could this be from other than the true Creator?!!!

[@me78723]

Also the big one they doubt God because they dont understand suffering . Or they say they just dont know and dont even try.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Yea it’s just out of arrogance. I see the belief in God or a creator is the most obvious truth/reality We had to have come into existence somehow

[@Deranged_ottoman]

Nothing cannot create everything. And our rare circumstance for intelligence consciousness, and revelations from God prove there is indeed 1 original cause for everything.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Exactly “We have created you, so why do you not believe?”

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@FarhanAhmedZia and I said, "I have created you, so why do you not believe". Come on now, worship me 😂

[@damnboi972]

@@AadityaSaraf69 one with billions of God and no job is talking too much. you guys pray to animals you can go back to sleep.

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@damnboi972 false, and false. Lmao 😂 you guys talk straight out of your @ss and think you spit some bars, typical 🤡 mussie

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@damnboi972 false, and false. Lmao 😂 you mussie speak straight out of your @ss and think you spit some bars

[@nouruldinabdeldayem5633]

جزاك الله خيراً ❤

[@catholicgamer1345]

excellent video. I am not muslim (im catholic) but I have learnt some new things from this. I am subscribed, keep up the good work.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

That’s awesome Thanks bro

[@CypherKingdash01]

Isnt the evil in the world is the consequences of us being intellegient and having free will? And god is going to judge us for our actions

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Yea you could say that but also even if evil existed because God wanted it to - that doesn’t refute the existence of God - also someone who is a moral relativist would have to prove what evil is - it’s subjective and they probably don’t even believe in the concept anywyas

[@CypherKingdash01]

@@FarhanAhmedZia true

[@MermezeaI]

@@FarhanAhmedZia isnt god supposed to be all good why would he want evil to exist

[@siimply_mee]

I'm not sure but does the thumbnail count as showing awrah or? Then it may not be appropriate.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

True you could be right

[@BoredMan0]

جزاك الله خير اخونا فرحان Something I noticed about atheists is there bias about sin that apart of their life like a alcohol addict or musician etc it is almost impossible from them to accept that what is sin

[@Scipio-yt7ev]

Literally most muslims listen to music, in college a muslim friend and I made a song about our classmates. Also, science says that music is good for you, yet a common muslim argument for alcohol being haram is science says it's bad for you, so if you subscribe to scientific reasoning, you've contradicted yourself.

[@Shuken_Editz]

Still can't prove existence of God

[@islamenglish-oh8bo]

M'y Muslim man IS cooking right now

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

🔥🔥🔥

[@Pikkabuu]

If you think that any of these arguments hold water then you really should smell the coffee. The video even starts with special pleading!

[@islamenglish-oh8bo]

@@Pikkabuu you should smell some Moroccan tea to calm down. it’s not because you have no argument that you must be offended :) :)

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@islamenglish-oh8bo bro you aren't even grown enough to understand logical fallacies 🤣 better sit this one out

[@islamenglish-oh8bo]

@@AadityaSaraf69 you don't give counter-arguments and you want me to take seriously...... com on :) :)

[@coolerx3211]

atheist know that Good and Evil exist They just can't prove it intellectually which makes them depressed and lost. That's why most of them become nihilistic.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Definitely

[@azanvideos]

May Allah bless you akhi

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

JazakAllah Khair thank you for your support Akhi

[@ak-t7d6f]

If God doesn't exist, why do good things happen?

[@sursumkorda]

God doesn't exist

[@The_Dawah_Guardian98]

It's not who "baked" the baker but who "created/made" the baker The answer is the baker's parents

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

No it is who baked the baker The baker is the one who bakes - he can’t be baked

[@The_Dawah_Guardian98]

@@FarhanAhmedZia Yes but he can be created

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Yes but the example is going over your head

[@anaahubalquran]

@@FarhanAhmedZia mr narrow destroyed you

[@owenm.1282]

@@anaahubalquran nah, mr narrow-minded is completely missing the point. Just like the cake and the baker are on a whole different criterion, the Creator and creation are entirely different.

[@Ondonol_]

Relly like this video you should do more response videos to atheists.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Okay Insha Allah

[@h3w45]

Thank you

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

No problem

[@ibrahimdeniz7308]

Brother... brother listen I dont remember who i learned it from, but there is a much simpler answer to "who created god" Here it is Asking who creatED god automatically implies there has to be time, the thing is that time did not exist when nothing existed, meaning the universe. This is like asking if a two pointed triangle can exist, it can not be asked as it contradicts itself.

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

Thanks for clearing the misconception that some people who thing they are smart have and all the things you said are nothing new.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Yea they’re nothing new but 95% of people who reject God I’ve come across irl reject God for all of these reasons

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

@@FarhanAhmedZia I'm different I'm an agnostic and how can I reject something if it doesn't exist I understand that you are not talking about me your talking about the 95% of people but their are people like me who are very different from the concept you have in your mind and by the way my morality isn't subjective.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Where do u get your morality from then lmao it can only be subjective or from an objective source

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

@@FarhanAhmedZia Where does your morality come from?

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

God, of course

[@Amr-lk7oy]

Aslam Alykum Brother. I just wanted yo tell not to show non hijabi women in the video for your own good. Thats it. May Allah bless you for your hard work.😊

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Wa Alaikum Assalam Yes akhi this was my first video - watch more of my vids and see I don’t do this anymore JazakAllah Khair akhi

[@VnzIdk]

regarding your second objection refutation, i believe atheist assume the classical theistic morality provided by God. Which is equally as wrong to assume that you'd need assume god does exist, and so he's omniscient and knows the perfect plan. Also God is not bound the morals he gave us

[@Avistyl]

These are refuting objections to God, not proving God through morality

[@Scipio-yt7ev]

1. That's very decitful selective language instead of saying "who baked the Baker who baked the cake" "who made the person who made the cakes" Is more open and universal. But the answer to who created me is simple The answer would be mum and dads copulation. But who made them, eventually we get back to "who made god" which is now a more valid objection. 2. Your morality is subjective and different from 99% of other muslims in at least some way, the only thing that is more objective of your morality over mine is you're convinced only your narrow version must be correct which is kind of big headed, even to other muslims. 3. "What if I like being punched?" Yeah I can't take this seriously i'm sorry. You're undermining humanities gift of common sense here. 4. Abiogensis gave birth to the first cell, no divine intervention is necessary for that. 5. Even if you convine me to believe in "something" It wont be the islamic view of god, who talked to an arab merchant who split the moon and flew around on a winged horse, nor the christian view of god who impregnated his mother, vandalised a marketplace, before unaliving himself. Easier to just beleive theres a god and nothing more about it.

[@MissMMystery]

❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

💐💐💐

[@RaniaRomd]

1-fair enough 2-not every athiest is the same some believe on objective morality like how not every religious person believe in the same religion for the same reasons also this is an objection against an omni-god not against a creator 3-fair enough 4- back to 2 ,but yeah it doesnt 5-science is a tool to explain yes, people blamed god or magic for things that they dont understand,it doesnt disprove the existence for a creator but it shows people shouldnt jump to conclusion 6-fair enough anyways please do not make fun of the other side it radicalises your audience who agree with you leading them to believe the other side is stupid and cant be reasoned with leading to just a cussing session

[@imir_]

2) Objective morality ? What do you mean lmao

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

I never said that these arguements and reasongs prove that God doesn't exist. I'm Agnostic, meaning that a supreme entity could exist, but it is simply a possibility, just like the possibility that the universe is eternal, or we are living in a simulation. We simply have no way to know what exists beyond us that doesnt mean we stop learning and pondering over what is the meaning of life and why do we exist.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Yea you would be surprised a lot of people think God doesn’t exist because of this reason. They fail to understand that everyone has to be an agnostic by definition if they are unsure and can’t be atheist otherwise they would be admitting to have certain knowledge of a metaphysical belief which they can’t

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

​@@FarhanAhmedZiaAccording to your definition, "Atheist" refers to those who reject God and are disbelievers, deaf and blind to the truth of Islam. Allah has severe punishments awaiting for them. The question here is, why is Allah so sensitive towards our actions that displease him that he curses his own creation? You may say these are emotional reasonings, but would you justify rape and murder if your God said it was permissible? Why would an all-powerful being need us? Why would he create something finite and limited? Why create us and everything if he is going to favor us humans over everything else? Coudnt he simply not create all the mess such as shytaan eternal hell fire and eternal heaven all the messed of laws such as the death penalty for apostasy and hitting your wife and stoning adulterers so many people didnt had to suffer.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

None of these questions you have in any way are related to whether or not Allah exists, it’s just your ability to not comprehend Him lmao But there are answers for everything

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

@@FarhanAhmedZia Because Its not about whether Allah exists or not it's about is the version of Islam you follow the truth well all evidence seem to contradict that.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Well really your saying because you don’t understand the concept of Islam or it didn’t fit your morality or make sense to you, therefore it doesn’t exist? That would be like if you were arguing with me 1+1 does not equal 2 if it didn’t make any sense to you Complete garbage

[@blacky5778]

You believe in Evolution as in we evolved from Monkeys?

[@jafroni6479]

my question

[@Pikkabuu]

We don't need to believe in evolution as science works by evidence. So we just need to accept that evolution is real as all the evidence supports it overwhelmingly.

[@Commentay_sursumkorda]

​@@Pikkabuuexactly

[@0kr4m]

evolution doesn't say we evolved from monkeys.

[@applepie6513]

0:28 - first of all blatant misunderstanding of a atheistic perspective, god created the universe is a argument that proposes a cause for something on the premise based on the assumption that everything that begins to exist has a cause. So not atheists do not ask what baked the baker when they ask what created god, they ask what is the cause of the baker if the cause of the bread is baker. Blatant false analogy from your side. Public execution of simple cohesive logic. 0:40 - And a religious person making moral claims is like a baby who has ego issues writing a book on how to walk. I bet you do not understand the problem of evil to its fullest. Let me explain the problem of evil properly. let's imagine a flood where a newly born infant who was born 1 day ago, cant walk, cant talk or even have the ability to choose for himself, dies in a flood. Why would Allah do it? If you argue that he gets compensated in heaven that means we are morally obligated to kill babies, sure it might be restricted in the Quran but what if the baby grows and turns out to be a big sinner? So we are sacrificing ourselves by killing babies and those babies will reach safely to jannah or heaven. It might be restricted in the Quran but we are doing greater good by your logic. and what is the point of the flood anyway? Why and what was the point of sending him to this planet in the first place? If you argue free will, I'd like to point out, The baby had no free will, if you argue this world is a test, test for what? Loyalty? If he is all powerful and all knowing why can't he just design in such a way that we are loyal? Free will? The baby had no free will, and he had suffered unnecessarily. If a criminal was born in an area and he had to murder because he was blindly forced into doing it and he didn't know it was wrong, why and how is Allah justified in punishing him? He had 0 control and he didn't know what was right and what was wrong. ( ill be making a community post related to this and we can debate there. )

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

How can you morally prove what is evil or not That’s just a claim you are making that’s subjective Anyone could view something to be evil differently - it’s just individual claims of what someone feels

[@applepie6513]

@@FarhanAhmedZia my argument is about suffering not evil.

[@applepie6513]

@@FarhanAhmedZia ​ ‪Explaining problem of suffering, and imperfection. Firstly imagine a baby who died in a flood. Now id like to ask you why did that baby suffer unnecessarily? You might argue that the baby will be compensated in heaven. But would that change the fact that the baby went through unnecessary suffering? Test response - first of all the world cannot be a test because not only allah is all knowing, but allah is all powerful as well. That means allah knew the outcome of baby's suffering. Thus he could have skipped the process and automatically derive to his own conclusion. Free will is not substance here because the baby obviously will react some way regarding a stimulus, Thus the outcomes are predetermined. Even if the baby could act different per the stimulus in a way which could be unnatural, that still wouldn't help a helpless baby save themselves from a literal flood. "Characteristics like bravery require a degree of suffering" You could argue that allah made him suffer just to create human personal development. But that is a super flawed argument compared to our observations. Why was that baby specifically chosen to give one specific attribute of bravery? Why did x person go through this when everything was going perfectly? Why would allah give the ability of cowardice to a specific group? Why are children from wealthy families ( like ultra wealthy ) experience lavishes and no sight out of the outside world? Why is that some groups get treated differently by allah and some dont? That seems counterproductive. If allah wanted us to have personal spiritual development why would allah not do it equally? Why would allah make someone brave but others not? Why would allah pick specific humans and make the suffering much more to them to the point they become suicidial and end them selves when if it was the end goal, why couldn't allah do that for all of us? Why would allah create so many unnecessary things that leads to suffering? Like why do we still have a appendix? Why does it make more sense that natural evolution and that change still occurring accounts for these non finely tuned basis? why is that a natural explanation gives more predictive power than islam?

[@applepie6513]

@@FarhanAhmedZia btw i deleted my community post ( incase u saw it ) because its unnecessary and we can debate here

[@aiya5777]

​@@applepie6513 I'd argue that the true nature of pleasure is actually just suffering Done right that's why even an Itch is closely related to pain and pain as you know, the byproduct of suffering, just scratch that itch and you'd get the good sensation from the scratching process even when you ain't feeling no itch, just deliberately scratch yourself first and the itchy feelings would emerge and again you'd get the good sensation from the scratching process suffering iS necessary in this world, it's just a spectrum considering a seemingly harmless itch is actually just the Lesser form of pain/suffering in this world

[@tysolbohan6446]

These statements dont answer the prima fascia problems with religion. 1 if there are many religions how do you know yours is the right 1 its just so convient that people who are born in there theological tradition tend to believe in that on average exceptions exist but they prove the rule that most dont most believe because there parents told them so why would a god with infinite knowledge not forsee this easy problem its not an hard problem to fix either have all reilgions point towards a particular reilgion. But they dont Hinduism does not point towards islam god is 1 with reality yrt god is also a incarnated personal being god is incarnated yet uncreated and he is also 1 in many forms yet he is no form god interacts with creation he doesnt sit above it on his arsh. The greeks did not believe in an trancendent creator god beyond all thought forms some neo Platonists like iamblichus and plotinus played with the idea of plurality in the 1 but that came later the original view was that the gods were thinking rational powerful creatures not trancendent moral arbiters like neo platonism. Your critique fails to address why all these reilgions contradict each other and teach the opposite. 2 morality is adaptive under a naturalistic view point and is down to darwinian selection which maximizes survival morality arose in relation to evolutionary game theory not inspite of it so an agnostic would simple point out they can judge god because there judgements.are what god proggamed into them via evolution which you accept which then begs the question why would allha the king on high design a creature with such a flaw ? You fail to answer why god commanding it makes thw ethical system just if god commanded genocide would that be right ? Surely if hes all knowing and all things are possible with god why didnt he choose the best possible solution to an harsh situation that avoids murder or genocide. Why does rape.and murder even enter our brains if god created us good why didnt he make our intentions good ? Why is gods morality excempt from emperical investigation why does god saying murder is right make it right ? If morality rests on god then murder is not wrong its arbitary again to something else. And who is checking out god how is this not a celestial north korea ? I think its a fair question we have to asj outselves who is checking god if no 1 is checking god how is he not the next celestial kim jong un

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

We don’t just blindly follow religion lol we assess them based on rationality and compelling proofs that are available

[@tysolbohan6446]

@FarhanAhmedZia That doesn’t seem to be the case for most religious people in Bengal, which is the religious context I was born into. Most of them say that, due to my parents being Muslim, I am Muslim by blood because it is my duty.They never really have a good rebuttal to questions like, “Why are we the right ones?” It always boils down to textual consistency being proof of divine origin, but that says nothing about the text being divine. Something can have impeccable internal consistency without being of divine origin, and there are many books similar to, if not superior to, the Qur'an. For instance, the Gitas are longer, more vast, and include pronounced cosmic speculation for their time. A lot of it is wrong, but some of it matches modern cosmology, like the concept of eternal inflations being days of Brahma and the existence of multiple Brahmas in each multiverse. This aligns well with many theories.However, that doesn’t mean it’s of divine origin. The Vedas also state that the Earth is 2 billion years old and that the stars are full of milk. Just because certain things are correct doesn't mean they are divinely inspired; given the vast range of possibilities, they are bound to get some things right.Regarding the Qur’an specifically, for every scientifically accurate claim, many inaccuracies occur. For example, it mentions seven earths. Unless one interprets this symbolically to mean seven planes, it’s awfully convenient because no one at that time would have seen these as seven planes-they thought of them as literal places. Why else would they provide descriptions of these places and geometric distances? If they were realms, you’d expect them to be discussed as pocket dimensions, but the text describes them as real places with large internal depths.So, for every scientifically accurate claim, there are inaccuracies, and hence the only logical position is agnosticism. Every theology has its scholars who offer very convincing arguments. Khalil Andani and Edward Feser, for example, have radically different views of God, yet are they any less wrong? Both argue from rigid logical consistency, and their arguments often extend beyond the scope of the Bible or the Qur’an, evolving into a concept of God that is detached from the original textual sources.Feser’s God is absolutely unknowable and non-partisan; even a Muslim could use his arguments to prove a generic monotheistic God, but this God is a far cry from the God of the Abrahamic faiths. Khalil argues for a God more akin to Plotinus, where God is not the absolute creator of all things; instead, creation is a series of seven emanations, and there is no creation ex nihilo. Instead, it’s “creatio ab primo principio,” or creation from a first point rather than from nothing.Most grand cosmic arguments for God lead to an abstract being that differs so much from the source texts that it might as well be another God entirely. In that case, you’re not even arguing against Islam or Christianity-you’re arguing against Plato, Plotinus, and Aristotle.

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@FarhanAhmedZia yeah we can very well see that (seeing a jahil liking his own comment for the 99999th time that is)

[@uam1071]

Comparing a hypothetical god to a baker is such dishonesty; they are extremely different in what they do it isn't even an argument. The reason why the question "Who created god?" is asked is through applying the same logic as "Everything must have a creator". Your only objection to this is just add a clause: "Everything must have a creator, which is god, EXCEPT god" for no reason except that is destroys your belief, it is the same logic that we can apply to reach a conclusion where there is a god behind god, another god behind him, and so on. This argument is flawed because there is no actual evidence to show that god is uncreated except for an ass pull of "nuh uh, I said so". Also yes evolution and the big bang theory do not negate god, but they do negate Islam, Christianity, and any other religion that argues a "creation" narrative, and keep in mind evolution is real, and observable, so this isn't a matter of opinion.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

You realise evolution in no way negates Islam or Christianity right? And you do know Charles Darwin was a Christian lmao

[@uam1071]

@@FarhanAhmedZia Charles Darwin being a christian does matter at all, irrelevant, but how can you explain evolution directly contradicting the creation narrative that both Christianity and Islam uphold?

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

It’s not irrelevant lmao Darwinism is the mainline form of evolution theory that everyone follows today If the guy that invented the theory of what you follow and it did not contradict his beliefs how are you gonna claim it does lmao

[@uam1071]

@@FarhanAhmedZia Darwinism (specifically the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin) is not the mainline theory of evolution followed today, just because he first described, observed, documented, and performed experiments on evolution, does not mean his understanding was at all complete. Since his life, there have been many tweaks and changes in the mainline theory of evolution. Also you ignored my question, how does Islam reconcile the contradictory nature of the creation narrative with evolution. Even if Charles Darwin believed in both his theory of evolution and Christianity, it does not answer how, objectively, evolution contradicts Christianity (at least from a young earth creationist point of view). Darwin personally could have believed in the creation story from a metaphorical point of view, as many christian scholars throughout history have; however the creation story is complete fact in Islam with few if any interpretations of it being metaphorical; so again I reiterate, how does Islam deal with the contradiction between creationism and evolution.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

@@uam1071so you are presupposing the specific Christian beliefs Charles Darwin had without knowing lmaooo. He definitely wouldn’t have - cognitive dissonance at that level would’ve provided him constant mental pain

[@MaroSurf03]

the first refutation is so silly, and so darn common. "Oh god is uncreated that's why no one created him" That's still special pleading fallacy because why can't we simply say the universe itself is uncreated. Essentially it still boils down to just making claims. Also evolution disproved the islamic god because it negates the idea of adam and eve

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

You can say the universe is uncreated if you want - we would still say there was something uncreated that’s existed first that caused creation to come into existence Evolution does not disprove the Islamic God or negate Adam and Eve Even if you still believe in Evolution - Adam and Eve still could’ve been divinely created as the first humans while other creation existed and evolved as well Plus that makes no sense - the Darwinian evolution you mainly follow which was thought of by Charles Darwin, himself was a Christian and believed these ideas do not negate each other

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@FarhanAhmedZia evolution most certainly disproves islamic god and negate adam and eve. If you have any claims otherwise, I suggest you write a research paper on it and claim the nobel prize (which you'll most certainly get if you're able to). If you're able to accomplish this feat, I'll convert the next minute

[@deniangle5924]

​@@AadityaSaraf69 how does it disprove Allah?

[@AtheistRizz-d6y]

Just because morality is subjective does not mean that it is arbitrary. Most people have similar morality, because people are similar. You can convince someone with a different morality by appealing to consequences of their morality, like saying you will be arrested if you do X, society will become worse if you do X.

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Go convince tribes in Africa that do human sacrifice, cannibalism and walk around topless that it’s wrong

[@AtheistRizz-d6y]

@@FarhanAhmedZia I didn't say that this is always easy or realistic, just what you generally would do if you want to convince someone. In your example it would be far easier to just force these people to stop than to convince them.

[@0kr4m]

@@FarhanAhmedZia how... is walking around topless wrong?

[@sursumkorda]

Dumb video

[@teddycunningham9167]

The question shouldn’t be why there is something but rather how there is something. And no just because something exist doesn’t mean it must of came from intelligent life😂😂. It legit just fucking stupid

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

Name me one created thing that exists without a creator

[@teddycunningham9167]

@@FarhanAhmedZia stars, blackholes, planets, life. These are all thing created out of the random events of atoms clumping together to form such. 😂

[@User_47536]

​@@teddycunningham9167 Yesterday, a tree randomly fell on the river, turned into timber and then those joined together to form a boat, random coincidence, evolution monkey banana wo wo waaa

[@NasirAli-g3f]

Then how on earth did they came from clearly something had to make them​@teddycunningham9167

[@Error_404-profilenotfound]

​@@teddycunningham9167 Bruh. Just think, everything started from big bang. Everything was gathered in a single place before big bang. After big bang everything has started traveling far and far away. Then just tell me, where those elements came from that was gathered on a single place before big bang? Just think.

[@Pikkabuu]

No. Your refutations don't hold any water. Your argument about God not needing a creator is just special pleading. Second argument of why is there evil in the world doesn't go away by saying that morals aren't set in stone! If God is omnipotent and good then you need to explain why he allows evil to flourish! Also your whole conclusion that anyone making the argument just hates God doesn't follow at all! And that was just your first minute! If the rest of the video is just you putting your foot into your mouth then why should anyone listen?!

[@FarhanAhmedZia]

If you don’t believe in God you are a moral relativist you can’t even prove evil and it’s subjective so it’s the same as no objective evil

[@Pikkabuu]

@@FarhanAhmedZia First of all liking your own comments is just pathetic and sad. Second. No. We can figure out what actions are detrimental for society and/or people, so can deem those things to be evil. Third if you argue that what God says is ok then you have to support tons of evil things that God said were ok! Fourth. Ignoring what I said doesn't make it go away.

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@Pikkabuu yeah lol, this guy is the epitome of a jahil muslim apologist and I am not surprised that his jahil ummah is loving his shit 😂

[@AadityaSaraf69]

@@FarhanAhmedZia morality comes from common sense not a f'ing religion, and certainly not yours, yours is the most abnormal one

[@User_47536]

​@@AadityaSaraf69 One mans common sense is another mans heart attack. Liberal Morality is Subjective, Period