Aim Defines Perception

Watch the full interview with Dr. Daniel Dennett - • Exploring the Philosop...
Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: bit.ly/3KrWbS8
// LINKS //
All socials: linktr.ee/drjordanbpeterson
Website: jordanbpeterson.com
Events: jordanbpeterson.com/events
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
Telegram: t.me/DrJordanPeterson
Newsletter: mailchi.mp/jordanbpeterson.co...
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus #DanielDennett #BreakingTheSpell #Religion #Science #ReligionAndScience #Intentionality #Aboutness #Intention #ReligiousDomain #Religion

[@pauldenapoli3494]

I can't believe that Daniel is gone 4 days later...so sad, rip sir 🙏

[@1975normal]

“THANK GOODNESS”❤

[@MrHandoverfist]

This is a great listen 👂

[@grecoeleanna2097]

"malinteso", understanding the word, was life changing for me. Felt exactly like this: pointing an arrow.

[@FallenB1ade]

Was this word discussed in the video?

[@grecoeleanna2097]

@@FallenB1ade I thought It was interesting to introduce a word with moral connotations, as it is composed of « inteso ». «Malintéso» like malentendu in french is composed of 2 words: mal (let’s say: not well) inteso (understood).

[@FallenB1ade]

@@grecoeleanna2097 It's certainly interesting that the word for misunderstanding has potential connections (in terms of root word) to intention. I'm not quite so sure what you mean by moral connotations of "malinteso"/misunderstanding though. .

[@grecoeleanna2097]

@@FallenB1ade I do not know… The same way I don’t know why It should go there or there in a sentence or in an entire paragraph. Franckly I’m a hot mess intellectualy and my passion is eating me up. But I plan to fix it by studying Classics in Rome, Italy 🤞🏻. But I thought that understanding of this word could be useful to Dr Peterson, as it was to me : understanding that intention couldn’t reach me the same way an arrow could. Stare and words can’t hurt you without an artefact. And a deathly stare and deadly words can’t hurt you.

[@knuerr]

Good chat….again! 😊

[@Razear]

"I think human beings are the measure of what's good." This is true in the historical aggregate given how far civilization has progressed over millennia, but history has also been rife with unspeakable acts of evil. I guess I'm much more hesitant about making such blanket generalizations knowing that not all of us are driven by the guiding principle of benevolence.

[@jordanbrauer5719]

We all have the capacity for good & evil, both on the individual front and as a whole species.

[@MrHandoverfist]

Spicy 🌶️ jacket , Mr P

[@thomascherrington5963]

Dr. Peterson I was blessed to watch your we who wrestle with God lecture in OKC. I hope that you saw my question after the lecture if not I will be reposting this a few times as to possibly have you see it hopefully I'm not annoying. The question I would like to hear answered is why is the Logos of the Universe on a Cross, why would he promise us anything, and do the promises he made apply to you? I have my own thoughts on it but your perspective is so Brilliant that I think that it would do the world some good or at least my consens. Thank you if you ever read this and thank you more if you ever answer my question. Thank you!

[@onuorahchinedujaynora9004]

Beautiful ❤❤❤

[@OompaLoompa74]

What's the move

[@aasja7739]

Human good anything changes. Our value of a thing. Our morals chage. We are NOT different from our ancestors. Our technology changes, but we don't. We are not more or even less moral. We know right from wrong. Good from bad. Moral from immoral, instinctively.

[@azdjedi]

I think he's saying the specific things we make moral are what matters. Humans will always know right from wrong, but the question is what should we decide to make good? And then ofc who decides.

[@creed22solar123]

@@azdjedi you are contradicting yourself. You say humanity knows right from wrong but then you say that we should decide what we make good? Well, one side of the aisle decided to make allowing children to undergo life changing and highly detrimental surgeries good, does that make it good? Who decided it was good?

[@azdjedi]

@@creed22solar123 Ah. I def see why you see a contradiction. You're right if framed that way, but what I mean is more like we know what right means in our hearts, we can feel what is right. We "know" what is right. Knowledge of internal fact, not knowledge of external, culturally-derived "good". Feel me? ** Here's something that popped into my head just now as I fed my cat. I know right from wrong: feeding my cat is good. What kind of food should I feed her? That depends on culture's connotation of "good".

[@sephiroth1class22]

😏😳😳omg he just died yesterday or today 😢😢this video means a whole lot more now. only for a number of reasons because in this interview, I don’t know if he knew he was going to go or if he didn’t know he was going to go but the information in this video means everything in this moment 😔😏

[@pauldenapoli3494]

You're here in the moment, and gone the next ...this happened to my dad, just got off the phone with him and passed 2 hrs later...cherish every moment, even this one

[@Don-ev9rb]

Is it intendure arkum in? Can't find it...

[@alteracco2715]

His concept of the highest good is ''not readily definible", but it readyily definible enough not to be God, a concept most of humanity throughout history believes in. How ignorant can a person be? Unless one is blinded by ideological posession as peterson describes, or rather hedonism in its purest form.

[@ty2010]

"aboutness", straight off into Hegel

[@britanikothegreat8513]

BAWIIN ANG MGA LUPA SA MGA SIKTA SAMAHAN NG PANANAMPALATAYA O KULTO AT IBALIK SA PAMAHALAAN O GOBYERNO!!! HEBREO 4:12.

[@11-AisexualsforGod-11]

The good is a shared story which leads us towards the one.. Animals and pagans can't share in story.. Why is everyone so clueless?

[@doctorofart]

Thank Goodness. Prudence (: Missing the mark? Knowing the mark is critical. Denny can not define the mark nor can most all men, because in the mass amnesia that Hancock and Velikovsky speak of we lost the Mark. The Mark is just the way god acts. He does not LORD it over us. I know personally the man you need to speak to about finding the ark, I mean mark, again. It is the missing chalice, the fountain of youth, what all the myths and legends speak of. The Holy Grail.

[@aasja7739]

Isn't sin also a negative? A deficit. A minus.

[@TheGingerjames123]

Greed is a sin which is not a deficit tho I suppose it could be a deficit of generosity

[@EbbandFlow1234]

We can't learn without making mistakes. No one is a peter perfect, no one.

[@wadewithcoffee1207]

@TheGingerjames122 What about greed being a deficit of love for our neighbors?

[@TheGingerjames123]

@wadewithcoffee1207 sure tho I don't think that quite encapsulates it fully either. There is an indifference component as well, someone truly void of greed would not care to earn in the first place

[@Siskiyous6]

His belief in evolution clouds his ability to accept God.

[@-firefly7931]

ye and tooth fairy just broke my jaw

[@bubbafowpend9943]

Your belief in your god clouds your ability to accept evolution. Plenty of (intelligent) theists accept evolution.

[@-firefly7931]

@@bubbafowpend9943 evolution and god both are real its just what you think is god ie spiritual(morals) is not god when reading scripture you read god is Elohim Lord our father, jesus rejected elohim and also when you read the scripure literal Elohim is Extraterrestrial - please check - paul wallis at the 5th kind

[@richard84738]

This video was more just JP wanting clarification of Dennett's ideas. I wanted to hear more from Dennett himself. Too much JPbberish in this one, sorry to say.

[@-firefly7931]

the question is who is god or what is god how is god described in scripture also jesus rejected elohim ( the lord ) God so where does that put jesus if elohim is god then jesus is no god and also what if i told you that god is not even human according to scripture elohim is extraterrestrial not a fallen angel like the nephilim see most wont accept the truth because it sounds unbalieveable want proof watch paul wallis at the 5th kind

[@estelaguidote3658]

You don’t have to be religious to believe in the Highest Good. The Highest Good is God and your personal relationship with Him. Nothing to do with religion at all. It’s the personal relationship with God through His Son Jesus Christ is all that matters. “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). I don’t understand why there should be intentionality and aboutness as they were discussing, when the simplicity of breaking anything (without even reading the book Break the Spell) is having faith and believing!

[@mishaarmageddon1232]

"Sin" is simply lawlessness, disobedience, rebellion against GOD.

[@-firefly7931]

the question is who is god or what is god how is god described in scripture also jesus rejected elohim ( the lord ) God so where does that put jesus if elohim is god then jesus is no god and also what if i told you that god is not even human according to scripture elohim is extraterrestrial not a fallen angel like the nephilim see most wont accept the truth because it sounds unbalieveable want proof watch paul wallis at the 5th kind

[@user-rj8py9ld3j]

When is the time of Jesus's return: It is when God the Father tells him (Mark 13:32). Jesus doesn't know the day of his own return but only God the Father knows all things. Jesus only knows what the Father has taught him (John 8:28). In 1 Corinthians 2:10, even the Holy Spirit must search for all things, yes-the deep things of God the Father. Only God knows His own mind, until he reveals it to Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and those who he draws to him (John 6:44). All who think Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and God the Father are the same will be cast into outer darkness. No one is God but the Father (1 Corinthians 8:6). All who belong to him are possessed with His power/spirit; those without him will say there are other ‘gods’ to their own demise.

[@-firefly7931]

the question is who is god or what is god how is god described in scripture also jesus rejected elohim ( the lord ) God so where does that put jesus if elohim is god then jesus is no god and also what if i told you that god is not even human according to scripture elohim is extraterrestrial not a fallen angel like the nephilim see most wont accept the truth because it sounds unbalieveable want proof watch paul wallis at the 5th kind

[@user-rj8py9ld3j]

@@-firefly7931 God is the Father. Jesus is the Son. The Son is not the Father; therefore, the Son is not God.

[@faded_shooter-yt7664]

When will Jordan start to dress regularly like he used too. This new style per say is not quite fitting for a man of such stature.

[@HealthyThinkingsubstack]

Dennett needs some vitamin D and B vitamins. I don’t know why Jordan Peterson is wasting so much brain time talking about religion, when the bigger issues of the day could use his analysis. Maybe these are just safer topics so he doesn’t get censored again

[@EbbandFlow1234]

Your plants crying out for a bigger pot. What is it an Aloe Vera? They grow huge. They like a sunny spot. Sin or Sine means time in physics. 🏹 aim high and shoot for the stars. Yup, worshipping war, gods. I believe in the Sun god, Gods son/ Sun. Jordon, one day, the penny will drop.

[@-firefly7931]

i used to balieve the sun god story first it was chritianity them it was pagen then i was autheist and now since i have been researching religion for some time i changed my view when i listened to paul wallis at the 5th kind i find it interesting how translation of scripture have errors translating into english and its shows how monothaistic faiths have been created in the way as a false truth the explination dennett gives for spirituality ie you can explain moral scientificaly you dont need religion to explain moral altho religion has helped giude humanity to do with morals with the word spirituality for a long time so dont get confused.

[@00SILVERBACK]

Jordan maxwell

[@omero9928]

First

[@azrielhillel5038]

Mr. Letterman is really showing his age.

[@The_Legend_Himself]

Ouch, dead just a day later 😢