Firstly, Never read a Bible verse without its context. Secondly, never interpret a Bible verse with your OWN understanding. This is what happened with the Pharisees. They knew scripture better than you & me & they STILL missed God. To refute your statement, it is very clear that Adam was not a “son” as said in Luke 3:38. Adam is not the ontological son of God as Jesus is; Jesus was begotten. That is why In the book of genesis, we see Adam as the CREATION of God ( not a son of God). If he was a son, God would have clarified it as he did with Jesus in his baptism but he didn’t. Luke is drawing a comparison between Adam & Jesus because AFTER this (Luke 4:1-13), he moves straight into the temptation of Jesus. Luke is emphasizing the difference between the actions of Jesus & of Adam. Jesus obeyed God through temptation & Adam did not. In addition, the term “son” doesn’t exist in its Aramaic translation , therefore, confirming the fact that Adam was just a creation, not a son. Sonship is received through birth of the spirit.
@marcuskaiser2236 Жыл бұрын
Context? The context of Luke 3:38 that states the Adam is the son of God, is not just an ontological son in his being, it is a LITERAL son because this is a GENEALOGY. It is stating the literal genetic purity - truly Homo Sapien Sapien genetics (with no serpent seed taint, Cain hybridization) from Adam (Son of God means direct creation of God), through to Jesus (the Last Adam). Jesus had to be, not just ontologically, but biologically and genetically in the line of Adam (with no Nephilim in his entire lineage all the way back to Adam), in order to save humanity as the one uniquely both the Son of Man (the fully human Messiah), and the Son of God.
@MadEye302 Жыл бұрын
Adam is Atom and Eve is evolution. The entire is metaphorical. Symbolism. Not a literal story
@Joniperdomo970 Жыл бұрын
That’s not true. but you’re entitled to your opinion.
@marcuskaiser2236 Жыл бұрын
You're off in left field and so many Bible verses debunk what you've said here.