The U.S. Is FORGING a 'New NATO' in Asia to CONTAIN CHINA

[@skylance6001]

Either presidents deserve the “Nobel peace price” for uniting two historical enemies.

[@miromanorzechowski5845]

Japonia ,Korea.🧎‍♀🧎‍♂🧎🧎‍♂🧎=Ussa

[@qaz120120]

For threathening war with China for no aparent reason?

[@MiguelDLewis]

@@qaz120120 Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Falun Gong, Senkaku Islands, etc. etc.

[@qaz120120]

@@MiguelDLewis And USA has a a valid claim on none of these.

[@MiguelDLewis]

@@qaz120120 Neither does Winnie the Pooh.

[@mela726]

I feel the Filipino's out here eyeing the possibilities

[@adrianjohnson7920]

I remind anyone reading that China has long licked its lips, wanting to have the Philippines if the opportunity presents.

[@iceteazen]

@@adrianjohnson7920 it seems annoying the Philippines was one of China's greatest mistakes. China probably forgot that Philippines has strong ties with western countries. it is the closest country to Taiwan(besides China). Philippines pivot back to the US due to China's aggressive behavior backed fired in way that US finally gain another military foothold near Taiwan.

[@kimandre336]

@@iceteazen The biggest problem with the Philippines is that it doesn't contribute militarily at all. America always has to babysit the Philippines.

[@MoralHazard-g1e]

@@adrianjohnson7920 More like bloodied lips from getting punched in the face. China has never had a significant presence in the Philippines and does not have nearly the soldiers or ships to launch an invasion 400 nautical miles away over open ocean against a nation of over 115 millions. They would get torn apart if not collapse under the weight of their logistical incompetence.

[@paulsteaven]

​@@iceteazen the Philippines kicked the US bases out of the country that benefitted China greatly. But what China did on return? They're too greedy and occupied maritime features inside the Philippine EEZ.

[@hexazalea1793]

Pacific and Oceania treaty organization? POTATO!? Merge with nato and it’s the Organization of Free Nations, a new United Nations (WW2 allies)

[@bastisonnenkind]

As an native potato I approve.

[@nickylc8475]

I want an alliance called potato

[@jaytbo5676]

South-East Asia Treaty Organization idk why ppl keep calling it the new NATO, just click farming a popular name I guess cause that thing has already existed for a long time lol

[@zehahaha603]

If potato was real, it would be the least active alliance

[@adrianjohnson7920]

@@zehahaha603 Yes but it would fit right in with "5 - eyes" security . . . Potato eyes. . . .🤪

[@shaolinman]

It’s NOT the South China Sea. It’s called the East Sea.

[@luisgonzales-jf7bv]

No need to used the word south china sea..calling all the world concernn plss..acknowledge the word.. its the South East Asia Sea (SEAS)

[@ryuhayabusa5935]

ASEAN SEA

[@Elongated_Muskrat]

China could just try not having border disputes with every country it borders and some it doesn’t.

[@jla872]

That would imply that China recognizes such borders. As it stands, Chinese policy is that pretty much the entire Pacific region was, at some point, part of the China and as such, it should come back to the fold, so to speak. Seriously, that's close to what their international policy is and why they act towards neighboring countries the way they do.

[@jacobl5488]

America can just like not have all those military bases aka colonies all over the world.

[@Mikaboshiff]

@@jacobl5488 tell me you dont know their purpose without telling me.... They're for military deterrence . A country would think twice before attacking a country with a US base in it.

[@JonTan-z3e]

border disputes? u mean thats the terrible things china did to her neighbours? oh dear..... can u say? iraq? 1,000,000 dead afganistan? 600,000 dead libya? syria? 200 to 500,000 dead yemen? 300,000 dead benghazi? mogadishu? lebanon? palestine? vietnam? 3.7 million dead laos and cambodia 300,000 dead yugoslavia bosnia congo north korea 1.7 million dead cuba chile nicaragua guatemala mali somalia kenya pakistan oh by the way these are all sovereign countries.....all of them had rights and their own sovereignty and were their own independent nation and deserved the right not to be bombed or invaded or embargoed and sanctioned and crippled but not according to US....according to the US none of it mattered and none of them mattered..... but pls tell me more about taiwan and how China violated her.....wahahahahaha......

[@stefanomedici5326]

USA & EU could just tried to draw better the borders of half world or to not try at all and many wars/issues were just not started

[@timharris8611]

Nuclear powered, NOT nuclear armed subs

[@qaz120120]

Did you not remember that the west went batshit crazy when Iran was enriching uranium? Nuclear subs need highly enriched uranium.

[@manofsan]

Nuclear sub is armed and nuclear. How would an opponent distinguish the way in which nuclear material on sub is being used? Is it going to have a giant barcode on top that satellites can read from space? Will UN inspectors be allowed to inspect the reactors on those subs to ensure the material hasn't been removed for bomb-making purposes? Give Me A F**king Break.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

Even if they are nuclear armed, it doesn't put much deterrence now. The A2AD of China is too strong to be penetrated that easily. The reason USA started the development of B-21 bomber is exactly because of that. More than 90% of the nukes fired at China will be easily neutralized over the ocean.

[@craigkdillon]

IMO, the US is developing a network of alliances, not a single unified alliance similar to NATO.

[@Pyrrhic.]

Unlike NATO, each AUKUS member can carry their own weight and contribute and doesn’t have a major free rider problem like NATO. But I agree, this is a better network.

[@Vincentovich89]

I don't trust countries we hand money to. They will betray us the moment China looks too strong. Wasted money.

[@adrianjohnson7920]

@@Pyrrhic. Tighter, more nimble and more focused and motivated. China is working fast to dominate the South China Sea, 😳 which must not happen. Whether China dominates it or not, it is clear that the 21st is the PACIFIC CENTURY.

[@cezaryadamski8786]

@@adrianjohnson7920 nope the XXI century is Chinese century. China is the sole superpower when it comes to manufacturing and exports. How long do you think it will take them to have a world class army ? 10 years ? The US on the other hand is sinking, has a debt of 35 trillion and doesnt produce much these days. They cant stop Russia nor Huotis lol so they only dream of stopping China.

[@oppionatedindividual8256]

@@Pyrrhic. right.. two of the AUKUS these countries are in NATO. There’s a false narrative that America is the only member that carries its weight, completely ignoring the UK, Poland and the Baltics.

[@Battleneter]

Australia's military is tiny, seriously overstated its future capabilities.

[@starhaven1881]

It always has been. Its often hit above its weight grade. Arming it will likely mean a lot more automation and modern drones and missles so the smaller manpower can continue to hit hard and really thats the best places like it and new Zealand can do.

[@WolfetoneRebel1916]

Nuclear subs change that though.

[@Balrog2005]

@@WolfetoneRebel1916 How many and when ? Yeah right now it's the Collins for many years because of Oz procurement BS....

[@dan7564]

Yes, but no. There's more to Australia than just the size of its military. It's a strategic location. With Pillar 2 comes tomahawks, which can reach out to the critical straights below malaysia, so they can stop shipping. Also, the CIA has the Pine gap base in the middle of the country. It's the only trusted ally on that side of the planet that has a land mass big enough to stop spy ships getting close enough to it. That base Grabs the satalites for that third of the planet which covers all of the US's enemies, China, Russia, north korea, Iran etc. Also, with Australia acquiring Virginia subs it will have the experience to repair/maintain allied subs in the north. But in terms of Defence force size, the army is small yes. But The Navy is set to double. Not just in hull, but tonnage. It already has one of the largest amphibious capabilities in the world, ahead of france and behind the UK, which is important as a china war will be all about island hoping. Furthermore, when the SSN's come alone, Australia will have more than the UK navy. This is small fry in comparison to what Japan and Korea can bring. But Japan already has a bigger blue water navy than china. Korea is very economically dependant on china, far more so than Australia. Plus they are more worried about North korea, so realistically the Korean Peninsula would just sit this one out. The other factor is time. The Navy increase to Australia wouldn't really gain % wise over china, just keep pace. That navy level up is decades away, but that's ok. Right now the US still has double the tonnage of the Chinese navy. So it still has a strong advantage, but the Chinese are outpacing them in ship building capacity. However, thanks to the one child policy China will be facing a demographic collapse by then, so it places china in an awkward spot either way.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

@@WolfetoneRebel1916 China has more than hundred subs and a dozen of them are highly advanced nuclear subs. Australian subs doesn't produce any deterrence at all.

[@Karlsewak-kempetai]

Russia, China,Iran, N.korea is the new alliance.

[@tsubadaikhan6332]

Except Russia and China would both like to own Siberia. Putin didn't move on Ukraine until he had the same number of troops near Vladivostok. China and Russia last had a Border War in 1969. They're not as close as you might think...

[@Karlsewak-kempetai]

@@tsubadaikhan6332 it's the alliance keeping greater enemy at bay. Russian and China had disputes from Quing dynasty, but this alliance is going to happen threatened by the western order.

[@Crashed131963]

Without nukes Russia ,N Korea and Iran are a joke . China is the only economic superpower in the group . To be a military superpower you need a super economy to support it . Out of the top 10 economies in the world 8 are NATO members. Canada has a larger economy than Russia .

[@paulsteaven]

​@@Karlsewak-kempetaiso not a true alliance then but more of convinience. Once USA fell, both China and Russia will attack each other like the Sino-Soviet Split during the Cold War. Don't forget that Russia still controls the territories Imperial Russia conquered from Qing Dynasty. And compare that to USA and Europe after the Soviet Union collapsed.

[@VTh-f5x]

India will join them in 5-10 years.

[@meynardocustodio7150]

What happened to the SEATO South East Asia Treaty Organization?

[@tikarai7169]

ASIA DONT WANT WAR WE WANT PEACE

[@paulskywarrior6943]

THAT WHY WE NEED AN ALLIANCE TO STOP ANY PROVOCATIVE WAR SPECIALLY CCP!

[@fahrankamili7931]

Yep, tell that to china

[@tikarai7169]

@@fahrankamili7931 USA is movi growing towards WAR ! Bringing its Military & WEAPONS SALING FOR WAR WHF** . We Dont want that Go Away from ASIA , CHINA is PEACE and Want BUSINESS Never Attack Neibours Country

[@jamesmarchetti3286]

I do and have been following Taiwan and the Philippines having for short times been to both !!! And I lived for the USA military one year in Japan and I spent 3 months in South Korea for Advanced cold weather training and good to learn and understand Eastern Cultures !!!

[@joeferreti9442]

Well, something like NATO in East Asia and the Pacific is overdue.

[@monsieurlepresident8835]

Why does the West have to be in Asia? this is not their hemisphere

[@obinnaezealah2465]

It's not overdue, it's stupid and provocative behavior.

[@DJC-it2sw]

The discussion in the video was only on knowledge transfer. The crux of NATO is the mutual defense principal. I think that will be a tougher objective in Asia.

[@fixthesegames6303]

@@obinnaezealah2465 Its really not. China is hyper aggressive when it comes to their border disputes with their neighbors. Many examples from South Korea, Philippines, Japan, and India.

[@mastersKaaP]

@@obinnaezealah2465 why? All I see are countries deciding to work together to bolster defence against a country that has, on numerous occasion, shown utter disregard for the international rights and sovereignty of its neighbors. One that is willing to constantly push the boundary of what is acceptable in terms of bullying, bribing and manipulating smaller and weaker nations. In a world where only the strong get to thrive, it only makes sense that the neighbors of China would want some kind of protection and leverage to push back against its ever expanding ambitions. China's expansionism and growing tension with the US is the reason why these countries are getting nervous. I know that if a war was going to be fought on my land, regardless of whether I want to be part of it or not, I'd choose to rather have the ability to defend myself than not.

[@mikeoleksa]

Good thing I don't like Samsung TVs and don't want a Playstation! 🤷‍♂🤣

[@terefefeyssa877]

NATO(The defensive alliance for European security). Right? How did the map of Europe suddenly become Asia? Very interesting!🤔

[@InfinityHS]

Yes! Very interesting indeed !! 😁💯🇺🇸 soon the whole world can become Nato

[@sinoroman]

NATO hasn’t been defensive for a while, it has been offensive

[@ColoniaMurder20]

NATO version in Asia region. defensive alliance similar in Europe within in Asia countries.

[@hyhhy]

@@InfinityHS David Icke pointed out already in the 1990s that NATO is seeking to conquer the whole world and set up a worldwide government. NATO's plans were visible even then, even though the mainstream media was always silent about it.

[@micahlelugas5139]

I am astounded that China bungled their local diplomacy so much that Vietnam is eagerly looking at the US as a partner.

[@WingkKong]

And become Ukraine 2.0

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

The fact is that no whitemen nation will send infantry troops to help any nation. The Americans won't bleed for a random 3rd world nation and that's a fact. The most any nation can seek is weapon and it entirely depends on the scenario because USA can't supply free weapons to everybody all the time and the willingness to send the most advanced technology.

[@micahlelugas5139]

@@WingkKong maybe. But Vietnam has a history of punching above their weight class on their own turf. Just ask China.

[@bangmo7]

very insightful. I am a South Korean. This episode is telling the true nature of the rapidly developing Trilateral Framework. (TF: the US, Japan, South Korea). Let me add some from the South Korean perspective. The countries under the most serious existential threat are the US, Japan and SK ( if I may put aside Taiwan, for the time being). Even UK and Austrailia are enjoying a much more 'comfortable' position. I am NOT being judgemental. I am just trying to be cool. But these three countries are undergoing a very serious domestic challenge. For 8 years, the US has been trying to find out the solution for the burning questions like what is true globalism and how it can strengthen/restore itself as a nation. Japan is struggling with the fundamental failure of its economy. Its only strength is its people's miraculous patience. But being patient does not guarantee an economic revival. SK is suffering from infilteration/influence by China and NK. And from population collapse. In short, each of these three countries are suffering from its own internal weakness. If each and every one of these three countries somehow manages to cope with its weakness, and if they succeed in consolidating the TF, the CCP/PLA will lose big. Japan is big and has the highest technolgy for materials and sensors. Recently they succeeded in test-firing land-launched Hypersonic Gliding Vehichle. And they proved the most powerful sensor for tracking HGV. (Just after the test firing, the US struck a deal with Japan to co-develop HGV interception systems, in May) Japan is operating 660K tons of war ships. From Chinese naval power, if we exculde coastal patrol ships (about 400k tons, almost useless in a proper maritime warfare where China does not have air dominance) and amphibious/landing ships(about 500K tons, useless when China does not have air dominance), the Chinese warship tonnage is about 1 mil., which is slightly larger than the sum of those of Japan and SK. (The US is operating more than 3 mil. tons) As depicted in this episode, South Korea is the mass poduction power house for quality non-nuke weapons. Its armed forces is 550K in service and about 3 mil. in reserve, who can fight as good as those in service. Including the Civil Defense Corps, SK can mobilize about 5 to 6 mil. people, not counting old volunteers like me, who is 65 years old in good health. ( I can handle rifles, machine guns and mortars). SK is armed to the teeth with 4 digit number of medium range cruise missiles and non-nuke ballistcs which can reach Beijing. The US is stationing about 80,000 men/women in Japan and SK (sorry for being binary. Men and women are the only genders I understand). I guess the US is using about 100 bases in these two countries The Camp David framework, I mean the TF, is very, very powerful. China has earned it.

[@kimandre336]

South Korea's economy is tanking down very badly. I don't think South Korea is going to survive in 5 years because America's political instability will definitely continue for a couple of years. (And I don't understand why South Koreans like America too much as a Korean person who was born and raised in Canada.)

[@olderchin1558]

All these maneuvering and alliance will just end up creating the China you fear. Today China has a relatively small military and small military spending, and no formal military alliance. China could double its military spending and standing force in respond. A country with a big hammer will see every problem a nail to hammer down, like the US today. The China, Russia, Iran, North Korea partnership could end up becoming a formal military alliance as a result. All this talk of Asia NATO and posturing will ultimately be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

[@adrianjohnson7920]

Cheer up. If SK and Japan are suffering population collapse, don't forget China is too.

[@greatsky8226]

Don't forget what the Japanese had done to Korean Women and Children in your country during the WWII. The Japanese will never forget who had dropped the Nuks in Japan.

[@bangmo7]

​@greatsky8226 yes. And I do not forget China sent 3 mil soldiers during the Korean War(1 mil. Casualties)

[@theconqueringram5295]

You know what they say, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".

[@cosmic24680]

No country can ever contain any nuclear armed country in this earth. Simple as that. If they do they are commiting harakiri.

[@Ranaimuye]

Russia & China are powerful nuclear powers soon to be allied with nuclear powered Iran & N.Korea.

[@fupopanda]

The Soviet Union was thoroughly contained. A nuclear-armed country can contain another nuclear-armed country.

[@paulsteaven]

Both Russia and USA/NATO "contained" Ukraine, that's why they gave up their nukes thru assurances.

[@Cipher422]

Dream on Wumao. If a nation doesn’t get its act together, it will inevitably collapse regardless of how “powerful” that nation is. I guess you’re forgetting what happened to the various empires of the past that collapsed due to various factors. I think you’re also forgetting what happened to the former Soviet Union. The PRC should stop alienating its neighbors, unless it really wants to know the real meaning of FAFO.

[@infiltrator01]

I hope for a global alliance. Nato + Japan, South Korea, Australia..and all other stable democracys in this region !!!

[@jarikosonen4079]

What should I do about this?

[@joeferreti9442]

Well, all the saber rattling of Russia, China and especially North Korea can have consequences. A NATO-like alliance in East Asia and Pacific is almost a natural step of this.

[@Belloking1]

US is a tyrant. Can’t play by the rules the pretend to uphold

[@GenghisX999]

N Korea has been asking for a peace treaty since the end of the Korean War in 1955. It is the US that blocks any formal peace and insist on US military occupation of S Korea. The US has a treaty to take over and command the S Korean army in event of a conflict. Yeh like real sovereignty for S Korea.

[@firstprib7742]

Nope we refuse. malaysia has joined brics. We in indonesia know who the real axis of evil is.

[@BahrizalShadow]

Claiming a sea 200 miles off its shore is an international crime indeed. Unprecedentedly crime indeed.

[@DaVincidevil]

Half of China’s “naval ships” are refurbished fishing vessels. 😂

[@bigmedge]

💯💯🎯🎯

[@AnarchyJesus]

that must hurt pull facts out of ur ass like that

[@therminust4]

so why US call help many alliance: NATO, Quad, AUKUS against China? a gangs worse than a trash?

[@anthonypiewtaofuu8411]

Is it? Then why the warmonger US wetting the pants when they hear the name China?😂

[@bigmedge]

@@anthonypiewtaofuu8411 suuuuuuuure , wumao 🤣🤣🤡🤡

[@29thizzle]

For those who think this is something new, I have some New Orleans beachfront property to sell you. You don't believe me? Allow me to provide you with some historical proof- the skies of the Korean Peninsula in the early 50s called 'Mig Alley where Russian pilots were flying Chinese fighter aricraft. The same thing happened over the Vietnam skies of the 60s and 70s where Russian pilots flew Vietnamese aircraft. Finally Serbia in 1999 where the US F-117 was shot down and Russia immediately confiscated the wreckage. Soon afterwards, Russia shared the then-secret technology to China, Iran, and whoever else had the money to pay. So bottom line, Russia/China ties date back decades, not a few years...

[@AlexanderAlexandrov-e5y]

So, to expand its audience, visualpolitik decided to use zoomer memes and phonk music... nice

[@ahrinin]

Dude, please refrain from the kind of subscription push by changing the subtitles. We have enough deceptive imaging on the web as is. At least do some differentiation.

[@dominickoh3634]

Chine is no match to U-S Imperialism 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

[@dennisrichards7994]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣And then you woke up in bed and found your hand on it , and it shit alliance is no match for China !!!

[@dominickoh3634]

@@dennisrichards7994 😂😂😂😂😂

[@mammenmatthew939]

Such an alliance should include all pacific rim states. It should also unequivocally declare thatvan attack on one, would be treated as an attack on the collective. That would stop potential aggressors in their tracks.

[@WingkKong]

I think this should apply in the middle east To stop the Western power attack country In The Middle East

[@ralphsunico116]

America has Rambo; Australia has Crocodile Dundee...

[@oneshothunter9877]

Russia has Steven seagal. Bullshido master.

[@ralphsunico116]

@@oneshothunter9877 Russia also has Skibidi Toilet... We are so doomed...

[@MoralHazard-g1e]

China has General Tso and his chicken.

[@monsourtecson4582]

the main function of it is to repel hijackers and pirates.

[@lajoyalobos2009]

Getting Japan and South Korea together is impressive. That alone should tell Xinnie the Pooh that he stepped in 💩

[@AnarchyJesus]

Japan has no real army and South k cant even deal with lil kim without US's help. yea xi is so scared im sure

[@TA.46]

BRICS 😅 Belt and road initiative Mexico,Cuba,venuzala china😅 Not every time u can win u won against Soviet union don't mean u will win everytime Australia has trade with china 😅

[@elinraoyus234]

Glory to country who stands against bully and greed country.....

[@dragosstanciu9866]

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan will make for excellent allies.

[@Stephen_Jabs]

They cant do it without the Philippines trust me

[@jacobl5488]

No, they will make excellent hypersonic missile targets. yum yum.

[@jwhan2086]

Each of them may be. But if you have them all together, you will find it terrible to deal with them at the same table.

[@jacobl5488]

@@Stephen_Jabs bro, ur country is literally named after a white european person, be more embarassed

[@bangmo7]

Taiwan, a hidden but a firm ally. From South Korea.

[@SuperGreatSphinx]

WAR IS A RACKET Smedley Darlington Butler

[@evolvedape3341]

It is also significant to note that NATO was not as large when it was founded as it is today. It would only be a matter of time until more nations would join!

[@GenghisX999]

To create more wars and problems in the world maintaining US Hegemony.

[@lukasardono2930]

Nato...is seeking war where ever possible. Creating trouble that the idea

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

NATO has no means of projecting power across the globe. On paper hundreds of nations can join but that doesn't make a difference at all. The most likely war on NATO borders will look just like Ukraine right now but across the planet, the naval power is only held by USA and even that is dwarfed by China right now.

[@pennyshi6474]

Okay. Cuba missile crisis V2.0 is coming 😂

[@teoengchin]

Japan, S.Korea and the Philippines already have bilateral defense agreement with USA which is superior to AUKUS

[@gordonjean6183]

You just endorsed Armageddon

[@3EyedBro-tk2yt]

I always knew kangaroos ran Australia

[@jtasakorn]

Signing up the Philippines, Singapore, Indonesia, and Taiwan (how would be tricky: not a recognized state but certainly an autonomous region) would be serious threats to China.

[@piotrd.4850]

NATO has ultimately proven failure - it turned into EU discussion commitee. It overextended itself. Considering cailber of states in region, geographical expanse, and other formats like QUAD. You could make case why in Europe Sweden would stay neutral and French and British should help defend Germany. Good luck trying to convince South Koreans to die for Taiwan. Or Singapore which would be well advise to both join and be invited. For Australia and NZ it will be remote distant war. Nto to mention, that many other actors are in between - India, Indionesia, Maylasia, Vietnam... NATO had really one opponent; Asia is ripe with mutual relationship. Such Aliance would make sense, if it NOT included USA. 9:33 - what? This is nonsense.

[@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis]

While it is true that the USA did try this before with SEATO (South-East Asia Treaty Organization), it does seem like this will work this time.

[@andrean2247]

Everyone has a plan until it punched in the face

[@KhattaRapidus]

"Everyone has a plan until kicked in the knee." -Muaik Thaison

[@rathanapparathanappa5077]

In resisting, opposing & containing especially CHINA. INDIA should join hands with the USA & other like minded nations. In hemming CHINA by encircling Militarily to halt its hapazard & uncontrollable Military movements.

[@jeronimotamayolopera4834]

WE HAVE NO FUTURE. JUST FIGHT.

[@jarikosonen4079]

Who is we?

[@timetraveller885]

How about showing American Aggression throughout the World for a Balanced Account around the World!

[@joeferreti9442]

Philippines could be key for such an alliance.

[@hughjass1044]

Agreed!

[@fritzvenezia9338]

That's what I said. US now has the advantage due to it having access to a lot of the Philippine bases, nullifying China's potential exploit and advantage. All that US needs to do now is to hijack or "Repurpose/Reorganize" the Philippine's defense forces.

[@hokroeger]

Colombia against Venezuela, Israel against Arabs, Ukraine against Russia, Tibetans, Falun Gong, HK, Taiwan, Uighur extremists, India, Philippine's dictators son against China. That has always been US's politic: to annihilate foreign countries ones against others, and then steal their resources. "We lied, we cheated, we stole" (Mike Pompeo) Funny thing: many of those countries or extremist groups aren't even aware that they are being used as cannon fodder by the US!

[@mamadumusajalloh4758]

And in the process become another Ukraine, you don't have eyes to see that America is occupying the Philippines?disaster will be in store for the Philippines if that bootlicker leader of theirs did not change course

[@marvingulanes5577]

​@@fritzvenezia9338 good luck with that. we may be accomodating and has heavy us influence but we dont subscribe to what you are saying.

[@bno5357]

The west should begin to concern about their own debt, not to concern a bout China.

[@bugsybogart6926]

What you talking about stopping Chinese advancing in the region, they already advanced in the region and they're advancing right now as we speak What is this guy talking about

[@bobbycarlin6136]

@bugsybogart6926 the guy is missing a lot of important details. Look up the US Navy's hellscape and ghost fleet programs. Now that's how you stop China from advancing lol.

[@campfireeverything]

This is my favourite of your videos.

[@tommymorrison6478]

They need a NEW NATO? Why did they end SEATO?

[@Pyrrhic.]

Should just call it IPTO - Indo Pacific Treaty Organization haha

[@MoralHazard-g1e]

@@Pyrrhic. Or, East Asian Treaty Membership Establishment, EATME.

[@VTh-f5x]

SEATO ended because no one came to pakistan's help when India was rag-dolling it. Americans were like - nah we're not dying to save brown folk. 😂😂

[@tommymorrison6478]

@@VTh-f5x Pakistan left in 1973 after East Pakistan seceded. It had nothing to do with being "rag-dolled", whatever that might be.

[@Pyrrhic.]

@@MoralHazard-g1e nice, would love to hear people pronounce the acronym.

[@matthewksiezak2752]

What scares me with some of this is that I thought North Korea had capability to just casually kidnap people from Japan.

[@MRTY323]

Declining empires think military is the solution to everything 😂

[@Pyrrhic.]

It’s really more about deterrence through joint collaboration in intelligence and technology, rather than just about military. And China and North Korea think military is the solution to everything too.

[@jacobl5488]

ya, they need like ten guys to gang up on one, scared much

[@MRTY323]

@@Pyrrhic. Go read Chinese five year plans. It's mostly about EVs, renewable powers, AI, quantum computing, pharmaceutical research, aerospace, and tech industries... When it supplants American dominance in those industries, how is USA going to pay for a 11 carrier navy? That's their game plan, a reverse Cold War.

[@Godfrey544]

yeah but we're all declining now.

[@nxp007]

You’re saying China? Yea, sure China is on the decline and think military is the solution for a lot of things. But I don’t think China is considered an empire in any way at all. 😅

[@randybentley2633]

I know it hasn’t existed since 1977, but has no one thought to look up the fact that an Asian NATO used to be a reality? SEATO may have been a bit of an ask back in 1955 when it was founded, but as Eisenhower intended, its aims could be brought to bear on the only country in the region that is not being a good neighbor.

[@isacr4063]

India should keep far away from this. We dont want to be involved in a new cold war.

[@death_parade]

India is keeping far away from this and as a return gift, USA is colluding with China to de-stabilize India's North-Eastern region. USA just did a regime change in Bangladesh and will now force Bangladesh to open a new US military base there whereas China is using proxies to take control of Myanmar. Next move is for both China and USA to send their proxies into India's North-Eastern states and de-stabilize India from within. USA and China are both a blight on this world.

[@edgardodelacruz6952]

NATO in Europe NATO in SEA china has no match to this alliance

[@saumikdeb4909]

We are with China.

[@UnholyRelic666]

Bot

[@edwardgalbis4949]

Communist puppet

[@inktownfishing4505]

@@UnholyRelic666 Troll!

[@daniellelee4920]

The west alliance only 12percent of the world versus China and the rest of the world 88 percent of the world😂

[@jaytbo5676]

Don't you mean new SEATO? Pretty sure that already existed

[@HTeo-og1lg]

Please be informed that God cannot be mocked. He hates war-mongers.

[@ATW090]

about 12 years too late to form this organisation

[@marktrinidad7650]

Its time to bring a new round of peace in the Far East. The area has been so peaceful for so long they have unimpeded economic rise. They focused on manufacturing, science and growing their economy. Heck the entire East Asia needs to have a huge reset so that America can maintain its global hold of the world.

[@VTh-f5x]

People are shitting in streets in LA, NY and London America and UK : AUKUS. 🤡🤡🤡

[@marcchuck-you-farleytrembl2145]

What is AUKUS: 1- America plan to sell more weapons. 2 - Britain's plan to remain relevant. 3 - Australia's plan to become relevant

[@TA.46]

BRICS 😅 Belt and road initiative Mexico,Cuba,venuzala china😅 Not every time u can win u won against Soviet union don't mean u will win everytime Australia has trade with china 😅

[@jchanmcse]

AUKUS , a hegemonic alliance like the Axis.

[@creamone]

America has a blood thirst for war 😮

[@SuperGreatSphinx]

Ares

[@VTh-f5x]

At the same time no capacity to take bodybags. What a weird dissonance.

[@chadbrad8100]

u only figured that?

[@inktownfishing4505]

They need wars so they can sell military equipment to pay off 35 trillion in debt.

[@saengchanhphrakaysone3269]

Any Nation has the right to self-defend under United Nations International Law and the Counties can make military block too.

[@JTL1776]

US UK AUSTRALIA New-Zealand the American and Anglosphere. Military industrial complex. Combined with. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore. Technological Capabilities. If there was a Nato Style Military alliance. China India ASEAN. United couldn't compete with the Might of this alliance.

[@lookintoit4537]

Why would we want to compete with this alliance? We have very good relations with all the members. We wish you the best. The bully needs to be dealt with.

[@VTh-f5x]

An alliance of China-India-Russia can decimate rest of the world put together easily. They have the most nukes, the most tanks, the most ships and the most soldiers. Having Iran, North Korea is just another cherry on top.

[@TA.46]

BRICS 😅 Belt and road initiative Mexico,Cuba,venuzala china😅 Not every time u can win u won against Soviet union don't mean u will win everytime Australia has trade with china 😅

[@akhilghag5898]

India won't support China😂

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

China alone outnumbers the puny Western alliance and their puppets. Chinese population is 1.4 billion +. They destroyed the sh*t out of USA in Korean war and made an example out of it. USA is scared of China since then and avoid a direct ground confrontation at all costs. Not to mention that China is the ultimate Superpower now with unmatched industrial prowess and largest navy on the planet that dwarfs the collective West by multiple folds. There is a reason China ruled Asian sector for more than 5000+ years.

[@greyzone3801]

First the Quad, then The Five Eyes, then AUKUS, then JAROKUS and next up... IPTO (Indo-Pacific Treaty Organization) Well they also have ANZUS that was formed in 1951 Possible IPTO founding nations: - Australia (Members of ANZUS, the Quad, The Five Eyes and AUKUS) - Canada (Member of The Five Eyes) - France (Has islands in both the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, could serve as an EU representative) - India (Member of the Quad) - Japan (Members of the Quad and JAROKUS) - New Zealand (Members of ANZUS and The Five Eyes) - South Korea (Member of JAROKUS) - UK (Members of The Five Eyes and AUKUS) - USA (Members of ANZUS, the Quad, The Five Eyes, AUKUS and JAROKUS)

[@VTh-f5x]

India doesn't do alliances. If you form an alliance in Indian ocean India will counter it. 😂

[@gostan2718]

western value is gay

[@tsubadaikhan6332]

Have you seen the gender disparity in China after the one child policy? You might be calling the wrong side gay.

[@kimandre336]

The western world is flamboyantly DEI to make a functional governance. The west is a joke.

[@inktownfishing4505]

I agree,Gay AF!

[@IusedtohaveausernameIliked]

Your information is good. The sound effects are annoying. You don't need to be annoying.

[@BoetHuman-pk8it]

White man talking NATO fight the Taliban for 20years and still lose to the taliban SK and Japan must learn from that

[@Go4Broke247]

Taiwanese and Filipinos better be careful by being used to die by their Imperial Master.

[@arghost9798]

A military alliance in Pacific. As someone from a country in pacific, im really afraid about this. Since my country want to stay neutral, there is a chance we will be dragged into war even thought we don't want that.

[@ettoreatalan8303]

An aggressor is not interested in whether a country thinks it is superior because it is officially “neutral”.

[@dreamingflurry2729]

It's funny that these "double the number of science and engineering graduates than Germany, the US (etc.) combined" can't reverse engineer a Soviet aircraft engine from the 80s! What am I talking about? The Shenyang J-15 carrier-aircraft ist a copy of the Soviet SU-33 (of which the PLAN acquired a prototype alongside the carrier that they rebuild and named Liaoning!), but the Chinese version lacks THRUST! It can't take off with both full weapons load and fully fuelled! Only one these, otherwise that thing is too heavy to launch!

[@dianapennepacker6854]

Without the metallurgy, precise manufacturing, and electronic software? You can try copying an engine all you want, but you aren't cranking it up to full power without it self destructing. I'll be honest.... That is my guess on why Russia and China haven't been able to duplicate western engines. Even their tank engine for the T 14 pales in comparison. So it is like what gives? Like I know they hwve the designs, the grubby theiving twits. Probably have the original blue prints smuggled through some spies ass. So why can't they duplicate them? I came up with that, because no one can ever answer it.

[@kathibaba7665]

You realise that they managed to build an carrier borne aircraft that has decent capabilities in the first time.

[@AdityaMehendale]

Grabbing popcorn - "Red Wedding" sounds inevitable...

[@SuperGreatSphinx]

Thou Shalt Not Kill

[@theawesomeman9821]

NATO has more honor among its members than BRICS

[@Forester-qs5mf]

The civilised democratic world must unite. We will not be intimidated by tin pot dictators

[@kimandre336]

So, dictators like Biden and Macron?

[@theawesomeman9821]

I'm all for a NATO style alliance in Asia. It will be useful in containing expansionist powers in the region like China and India.

[@death_parade]

India? Expansionist power?

[@theawesomeman9821]

@@death_parade India is currently occupying parts of Nepal and the whole of the Maldives despite the protest from those countries.

[@death_parade]

@@theawesomeman9821 Stop lying as blatantly as Flat Earthers. Sum total of India's military presence on Maldives had one crew to fly and maintain a Helicopter that India had donated to Maldives. Maldives current president ran on an "India-out" campaign. Did India intervene to stop him? No. He got elected. Did India conduct a regime change/coup? No. After getting elected, he asked that Helicopter's crew, which were the only Indian military personnel in Maldives, to go away. Did India refuse? NO! India withdrew its personnel. And you claim that India is "occupying Maldives." Case of Nepal is even more ridiculous because India doesn't have ANY military presence there. Your lies are so blatant that even a kindergartner will be able to see through them.

[@TA.46]

​@@theawesomeman9821why don't USA give back land to native Americans isn't it occupation and why don't western European go back to Europe from N America

[@srinivasvyasarao]

@@theawesomeman9821 Are you Paki?? India does not have any ambitions with Nepal and We inherited our borders from UK ( with Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China)

[@bensatow3368]

What a great idea! Don't forget to add the Philippines, Viet nam, Singapore, Brunei,Malaysia, Indonesia,Taiwan,New Zealand, Canada, New Guinea......

[@ASlickNamedPimpback]

why tf did you mention canada lmfao

[@BornKafir]

​@@ASlickNamedPimpbackBecause even if we don't directly join a US war, we still end up supporting and helping with different things and few Canadian soldiers always end up in the war even if the country isn't officially deploying.

[@ASlickNamedPimpback]

@@BornKafir yeah but I mean look at the other countries in that list. They are all pacific-region countries, near China. Then there’s just Canada, which… we kinda don’t fit in

[@BornKafir]

@@ASlickNamedPimpback Western countries have a lot to benefit from helping Philippines, Vietnam and all the other countries stay free and their borders and waters protected. China is most obviously not being a good neighbour. Gotta wear big boy pants and commit to the job if you want to sit at the big boys table. If their sovereignty is not defended today, nobody will help us in need either. Canadian Arctic is being challenged.

[@PhiloSurfer]

Don't forget to add Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, UAE, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq. Oh yes, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Might as well add Venezuela, Argentina and Puerto Rico. Have we forgotten anyone else?

[@robertshindeliii]

When you showed Xi Jingping say "if you don't subscribe to the channel," I literally went back a couple times to try to figure out what he meant before I realized it was a joke. I feel stupid. 😅

[@adrianjohnson7920]

Feeling stupid every once in a while is probably good, makes or keeps one humble. Enjoy laughing at yourself, it keeps you human. Egotists have. no sense of humour.

[@AlexandraSophieKadnerPhD]

That channel subscription clip is total horseshit. How do you expect to be taken seriously if you mix in channel advertisement that can be mistaken for content?

[@terencequick1]

That Xi video in the beginning, the subtitle does not reflect what Xi was saying.

[@Jurjen.]

We're heading to a global security alliance for free and democratic countries.

[@BornKafir]

Not really. It's more like developing countries and Russia pushing back against America's disregard for everyone else.

[@VTh-f5x]

Bad move. That will unite everyone against the west.

[@DarrenLine-k4j]

Where were all those plain clothed troops sneaking off too ?

[@guillaumeroy7528]

I wish that Josh had mentioned Taiwan's potential contribution to an Indo-Pacific military alliance. Too often, the country is sidelined due to its political status but it would be a mistake to neglect it given its geopolitical importance and technological prowess. We don't want another Ukraine invasion scenario in the Pacific.

[@tsubadaikhan6332]

Acknowledging Taiwan as its own entity would upset China. An angry China is what everyone is trying to avoid.

[@G-Man-half-life]

There is no need for a new NATO alliance just add Japan, Korea, and many other Asian countries to the old European NATO alliance instead

[@adrianjohnson7920]

Pacific rim countries would not find it inn their interests to commit to reciprocal aid to NATO countries when they engaged in European or Russian wars. . . .

[@MiguelDLewis]

Bad idea. China could more easily conduct espionage operations through Japan and Korea if they're NATO members. It's best that they remain non-NATO allies, I think.

[@VTh-f5x]

How will japan move to north atlantic?

[@tikarai7169]

We Dont want WAR in ASIA USA AND EUROPEAN GO AWAY WE DO PEACE

[@JackHanma123]

Thanks the Gods....please help save the Cordilleras young and their age from the corrupt Firipin....😮❤

[@stevensum2011]

I subscribe now!😂

[@dalehartley2821]

AUKUS and the QUAD are looking more and more like a the beginning of a future Indian Pacific mutual military defence treaty organisation modelled on NATO. Less about containing China and more about protecting a range of smaller democratic nations from potential military adventurism by powerful, or stupidly belligerent Autocracies. If so, both AUKUS and the QUAD are likely to either be dissolved and incorporated into the new organisation, or remain as a quieter secondary treaty running in the background. But the new organisation is likely to hold a different name. Possibly PITO(Pacific Indian Treaty Organisation)?

[@youcantata]

Most of eastern and northern coast of China and her strategic major cities like Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Nanjing, Hangzhou, i.e. economic, industrial, population and political heartland of China, are all located within 1,000 km distance from South Korea, Seoul or Jeju Is., a stones throw. Distance from Habana, Cuba to New Orleans, USA is about 1,000 km. Range of Tomahawk missile: 1,500 km. And Korea (both South and North) are crazy on massive rocket and missile. Even Taipei, Taiwan and Fuzhou, are about 1,000 km from Jeju Is.

[@Crashed131963]

A war with China would turn Nuclear so it does not matter. A Trident and Minuteman ICBM has a range of 12,000km. China's 6 largest cities could be destroyed in hours from one Ohio Class Submarine parked of the coast of Greenland while submerged .

[@death_parade]

Everybody gansta till Jeju island mercs all the Hunters and no Sung Jinwoo shows up.

[@TA.46]

​@@Crashed131963china has nukes to

[@Crashed131963]

@@TA.46 That's why we have no ww3 . Nobody wins .

[@Baggio10100]

I understand Chinese ships going around in the Chinese sea; what I do not understand is what the F... the US ships are doing in that region or in the Mediterranean at 10.000km from there coasts... new alliance...USA needs more servants to fight instead of them it served well the Ukrainians

[@inktownfishing4505]

I agree 100%

[@Minchya]

The idea was Australian PM Morrisons , thanks for giving all the credit to sleepy Joe.

[@VTh-f5x]

Scomo was worse than rudd. Just when you see you've seen it's worse australia surprises you.

[@Minchya]

@@VTh-f5x You are right, very disappointed with Albo. Just when I thought all our leaders were B grade we are now down to C grade.

[@sammy_trix]

Philippines will be the crowning jewel of the POTATO ALLIANCE.

[@WingkKong]

You mean become Asia's Ukraine

[@sammy_trix]

@@WingkKong Or China will become Russia, China is a papertiger.

[@sammy_trix]

All I can say is that it is a lie.

[@WingkKong]

​@@sammy_trixwe help other country to build road Port n train Look at the western power All the bomb killing women and children in middle east is supply from the west

[@Valanor1]

I love Japan. From New Zealand.

[@blackbelt2000]

weeb from NZ in da house

[@yiping7193]

Opening Scene where Xi speaks is so cringe, if you can't alter the speech at least mute him or use voiceover for anyone has any remote understand Chinese its really bad.

[@jacklaurentius6130]

Okay that xi jinping speech was genius 😂😂😂

[@dcc70]

Pacific "NATO" is needed, not to contain China, but to combat privateering Chinese maritime militia

[@florantesoriano8737]

You are dreaming now a days no body wants to ally in military to America you are ridiculous... But any way it may you earned a lot..

[@Rapguruu]

The military alliance is to defend "western values " in the indo pacific why cannt western values be in the west,

[@tswong2409]

Long live Mighty CHINA.. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@edwardgalbis4949]

Stp

[@NirajKumar-wb5hg]

As an indian 🇮🇳 if only we dont have border disputes or we can solve it asap we will surely support china 🇨🇳