The V-Strom 800 DE is BETTER than the Transalp - 2023 Suzuki versus Honda ADV Comparison

[@jaywhoisit4863]

Suzuki honestly just builds amazing bikes. They are well built and reliable. Features tend to be more basic but that doesn’t interfere with the true riding experience.

[@edgarv.611]

Agree. Unfortunately they build so ugly bikes

[@liv0003]

I really appreciate both the brands, Honda and Suzuki. Both of them build amazing and reliable bikes in my opinion.

[@downhillupside]

@@edgarv.611 Interesting perspective, given the v-strom is far better looking than the Transalp

[@djolecar88]

@@downhillupsidethe 1st gen v-strom is ugly and I got one, 92k miles and can’t help but love it. The new one looks awesome!

[@ΑναστάσιοςΠαπαζαχαρίου]

Well built and reliable, i guess the cracked frames are a plus nowadays.

[@nomayor1]

I have a 2006 Suzuki DL V-Strom 1000. I bought it new in Greece, rode it all the way to the UK, where I still use it almost daily. It has done more than 70,000 miles. Problems? None. Absolutely none. You have to work on the bike to experience what I have experienced, it has good quality rubbers, good quality electrical connectors, layers upon layers of screws, clips and hooks to hold the bodywork tightly in place. It just feels like "someone" wanted to make a bike that would last. It hasn't blown a single bulb, what else is there for me to say more? On the topic, something that impresses me, the bulbs are Philips, german. The radiator coolant hose clamps say: "Made in USA" on them. The ECU is made by Mitsubishi. It seems they looked around the entire planet, to find the best parts they could use. Well, it worked. I am looking now to buy a replacement. Not a replacement, I will always have the DL. A successor for daily life let's say. It will be a second-hand 2017 model, I have full confidence it will be absolutely fine. These things are bulletproof. A small observation on the video, if I may: At point 1:15' it seems to me that it has two counter-balancer shafts not one, one in front of the crankshaft and one under it.

[@alxx1378]

Me living in Greece owning a 2002 dl1000 I can confirm after 130000 klm it is bulletproof.

[@thealvaco]

I have a dl 650 with 238 000 kms on it. Never adjusted the valves. Ever.

[@maximilianpaech1944]

I have my DR 800 since 1992 with more than 100K, Travelling to Greece from time to time and she still needs no oil 💘

[@thealvaco]

@@nomayor1 I checked the valves, Isaac Newton. They are within spec.

[@thealvaco]

@@nomayor1 238 000 kms, not 290 000. I did not neglect my bike. You just assumed that.

[@2Thumbs0402]

Until you ride both you can't decide which is better. Spec sheets tell half a story. These sorts of video's grind my gears.

[@Grahamvfr]

Yea I agree, but I still watched it. What does 'better' mean anyway. I tried to avoid thinking 'better' rather 'what suits me'.

[@driftx2]

It tells half the story, next half is to ride it.

[@lauraiss1027]

And then you discover gas tank is under the seat, air filter is behind non-removable headlamp, service interval is every third weekend and valves are adjusted with shims. Specs are like "this girl is 6 feet tall, brown hair".

[@CaffeinatedCode]

100%.

[@paulmendoza395]

@@lauraiss1027 which Motorcycle model are you referring to?

[@alphajed7700]

The thing that Transalp has advantages are: •You can select the aftermarket accessory packages such as: Touring, Comfort, etc. •Phone connectivity which is important to me in my opinion. •You can customise riding mode •You don't have to add stuffs you don't want. However, Suzuki have it all as a standard stuff(except Phone connectivity, customisable riding mode, and of course, side/top bags which it can be sold separately). But still, I'll still buy V-Strom 800DE for these reasons: •Having more fuel capacity •Menacing looks, especially the beak(which is always a subjective matter) •Making quickshifter as standard which makes my ride more comfortable, less stress.

[@foundationofintegrity]

Tuareg 660 first then Suzi I think!

[@philiprobinson2011]

Having been a Honda customer for over 40 years, I was very disappointed with the quality of my last bike and the attitude of Honda Customer Service, so for me Honda will have to improve a lot before I would go back to them. I have also noticed a trend recently for Honda to produce bikes which are bland and unexciting, bikes such as the NT1100 and the new Hornet. I am sure they are good bikes, but they don't make me wish I owned one. Then along comes the much-anticipated Transalp and yet again Honda plays it safe, with another uninspiring design. I can only think that Honda has lost the plot or are watching every penny. Compared to the Suzuki, it is a no contest for me. Yes, people will still buy the Honda just because it is a Honda, but the Suzuki is head and shoulders the better bike. Well done, Suzuki.

[@tootingcarmoon532]

I was also disappointed with the NT, and I feel no spark for the Transalp either. I agree with you, Philip.

[@phil6506]

Why buy the Honda when you think the Suzuki is the better bike? aren't you taking brand loyalty a bit far?

[@buzzinadventures4217]

Parting out a lot of production to the big C to keep costs low - quality and reliability are getting worse with Honda....

[@musikerman52]

Upgraded my 6yrs old 650 v-strom to a new 800. Very happy indeed, the only features missing 1) larger windshield and 2) cruise control. Waiting for aftermarket versions of these.

[@jeffweier4824]

I've owned Honda's and Suzuki's as well as other brands, so I can't be accused of brand loyalty. In this case with similar power and more torque along with standard quick shifter, adjustable screen guards and most importantly way more suspension travel IMHO it's the Suzuki that is the winner here.

[@Sambo111]

25kg more heavy

[@STohme]

I possessed the old 600 Transalp and the old 750 Africa Twin and I have good souvenirs of these Honda midsize bikes. This time I recognize that Suzuki made a slightly better 800 V-Strom bike and if I decide to buy a mid weight adventure bike I will choose this Suzuki 800 V-Strom. I agree with your analysis and comparison between these two new very good bikes.

[@acadenacci]

Ok anche io, possessore di 600 transalp 92 in foto la penso come te, mi sembra che la suzuki 800 de sia superiore.

[@billyb6043]

I toured Europe on the original XLV600 and loved it, but wanted something with better fuel economy that would sit in the same sort of riding category. Bought a 2016 CB500X, which is a great bike for the outlay, but definitely needs money spending on the suspension, especially if you plan to do anything more than easy gravel roads. All the CB lacked was tubless spoked wheels (preferably 21/18), a few more ponies and a diet. The new CB5 X is a better prospect but it's still a compromise on power. When the new transalp was announced I was really hoping they'd take the initiative, but I think they missed the mark. 206kgs before adding any meaningful protection, basic (albeit decent) suspension, and tubed rims! It'll be a great commuter/tourer but in it's current form I can't see it being particularly good off road. Last hope is the promised new NX 500, based on the CB platform, but if they still don't utilize a bolt-on rear subframe, and increase the power output, I'll be disappointed. I also own an old suzuki freewind, which is essentially a restyled DR650 with lowered frame and 19/17 spoked rims. Well designed and bolted together. Hands down better bike off road than the CB 500 X, but it's a single so not quite as refined on tarmac. I think the new V Strom (P strom?) will be the 'go to' bike for more off piste adventure touring, but it needs to shed some weight...

[@kamkasturie]

Will go with Suzuki. Sounds great on paper. Hope it will be cheaper than Honda.

[@phil6506]

It would be a tough decision, but I would go for the suzuki. I have owned a couple of vstroms in the past,DL650 & DL1000, both bikes were incredible machines.

[@ChaohsiangChen]

I wish they still use traditional needle clocks with old style LCD.

[@curthenry9398]

If Suzuki would have used tubeless tires as these types of motorcycles are used mostly on roads. Cruise control would have also made Suzuki the better bike, easy to do with fly by wire. I installed MC Cruise on my 2020 V-Strom, works flawlessly. Cruise control has saved me from several speeding ticket as I tend to go faster than posted, set the cruise for 7 mph over and the LEO's may flash their lights but do not stop me.

[@wirootchanaksongkram5772]

Sad for both the rim wheel not tubeless...

[@TerenceKaplan]

To be fair, the Vstrom is the DE, which is on the 1050 is the up-specced version, and the Transalp looks like the base version. But just based on the engine, expected dyno's... Vstrom all the way. HP wins at the track, but torque makes the world go around.

[@donaldheine6243]

I'm leaning toward the Suzuki. Ultimately we will have to see how they ride.

[@Hans_P]

Aprillia Tuareg wins over both IMO except for lack of dealer network. Suzuki should be easier to get serviced everywhere.

[@terrarecon]

I have to agree, but that wasn't the comparison. He's looking at upcoming bikes, not what is available now.

[@brettw1518]

Not difficult to do your own service.

[@jokermtb]

And judging by Suzuki’s epic reliability reputation, it would scare me to get the Aprilia (as it’s clearly a spectacular bike) - it’s the years down the line aspect that Honda and Suzuki stay reliable after the honeymoon period is long gone

[@jaywhoisit4863]

I never even consider the exotic bikes because you can’t trust them. Riding in the middle of East Africa is a shitty place to have a breakdown. That’s why I ride a Suzuki Vstrom. Never a moments worry.

[@bitterlifes]

Both looks very nice ! But definitely i will choose Suzuki, it seams to be more versatile, slitely more off road oriented.

[@martyn_g]

Not at 230kg wet…

[@andrewtreloar7389]

Suzuki - very underrated in my opinion. I was eagerly expecting the Transalp release, only to be left underwhelmed. To be honest I was expecting more from Honda, a harder edge to the Transalp and more off-road cred filtered down from the Africa Twin. I didn't happen, so I was left a little disappointed - like when Kawasaki released the new KLR - underwhelmed and disappointed and an opportunity missed! If I had to choose, it would be the V-Strom 800 DE for sure.

[@kino266]

The transalp always has been aimed more towards road than offroad.

[@andrewtreloar7389]

@@kino266 l know mate. I rode one from London halway around the world

[@iallso1]

I have loved my Vstrom 650, I'm pretty sure that in a choice between the two I would go yellow again.

[@seangray4512]

After watching that, I'm def getting a T7 🤣🤣🤣

[@CaptainDangeax]

I made the same compare in 2008 and guess what, I choosed the VStrom against the Transalp. At the time, I wonder how could someone buy the Honda instead of the Suzuki

[@got_to_roll]

Previously owned a V-strom650, riding a Super Tenere now. If forced to pick one of these it'd be the V-strom. If Suzuki adds cruise I'd seriously consider buying the V-strom as a second "lighter" bike. 🤔

[@Avensur]

Well, I was gunning for the Honda but I'm considering the Suzuki to be my first adventure bike, excellent engine, more range, suspension travel, and a well and savvy made frame. Thumbs up 👍💪

[@kumonojuuza]

If u want a real.Adv bike at the same price...the winner IS Teneré 700 World Raid...

[@Alfra1324]

I’ll take the Suzuki!!! 😂

[@williampeiper292]

I am a fan of Honda but I admit that the Transalp has disappointed me

[@akula1055]

I am a Honda guy as well, but lately Honda is ruin the looks big time. Look at the rebel, nt100 and hornet they look ugly.

[@hakimlehaineu]

😄😄 I had a v strom and a transalp. My next bile will be the new transalp for sure

[@volt8684]

Yellow? Come on Suzy make it prettier

[@falchiherve2024]

I had several hondas and one suzuki v strom.....my n'est bike is goi g to be this v strom 800 beauty.....v stroms are soooo fantastic.....check the internet once you ve riden à v strom ...you are hooked with v stroms for life!!

[@hakimlehaineu]

@@falchiherve2024 ha ha ha 😄

[@metanolx]

Honda is Honda and the winner of this comparison will be decided by sales. On the other hand, I think that whatever you buy you won't be wrong, tastes are like as... we all have one.

[@dustinanderson4809]

Agreed.... regardless of which one u pick you won't be disappointed. People can argue over which is better but at the end of the day they're both great bikes.

[@davidnobular9220]

A man with Imperforate Anus may have something to say about that. Or maybe he doesn't have any opinion whatsoever.....

[@tommihelminen6430]

I bought one month a go Suzuki v storm 800 and god it is so cool!!! I think that Honda is good as Suzuki, but i just like more outfit of V-storm and motor. The motor give you wery nice power in low rouds and i like it more than hig turning gas.. it just reminds Harley more. Bouth are wery good bikes, but it vote for Suzuki 😎💪

[@vtownjester]

Never been a huge fan of the beak, but throw some Anakee Wild's on there and change that stove pipe by an aftermarket exhaust, you've got yourself a menacing looking bike. Could even give the Tenere a run for its money.

[@snupermoto723]

I think I'd still choose a Tenere700, but prefer the strom over the TransAlp

[@alphajed7700]

T7 is just hard to beat for it's simplicity, yet extremity as a middleweight ADV bike.

[@kumonojuuza]

The World Raid Is the best

[@jadekroon58]

I prefer the Suzuki. Thanks for your presentation.

[@2104alba]

Both bikes are great bike... I think that depend on personal preferences. Suzuki and Honda are very good brands!!!! Congratulations from Spain... Enjoy the Suzuki or Honda as you prefer!!!!

[@dustinanderson4809]

This is exactly what I've been saying. 100% agree. Both bikes are awesome but Suzuki really surprised me and has won me over. And to be honest if you had asked me last week I was 100% on board with the Honda. Suzuki really stepped up thier game. Totally impressed and totally planning on getting the grey adventure model. Also Suzuki has MUCH better factory accessories. They use SW Motek aluminum panniers and bash plate. Top of the line stuff. Hondas panniers are plastic and their bash plate is Very thin.

[@RidgeRoamer]

Thanks for watching, and thanks for your input. I agree!

[@jokermtb]

The grey and yellow colorway is my favorite

[@luciano76464]

Concordo sul colore grigio/giallo molto bello

[@thebarrysblackmamba4767]

Absolutely amazing for suzuki wins.would definitely chose suzuki

[@inferno66750]

I actually have a crf1000 dct and ride off-road with it. I love Suzuki bikes (I had 2 SV650, a DR650, 2 Vstrom 650). Between the transalp and the Vstrom 800 I think I'll choose the Vstrom. But it a little bit heavy and I don't understand why they don't put cruise control. For now my choice is still the Norden 901 to replace my CRF1000.

[@rickseconds7676]

I like the looks of the Honda better, but I would buy the Suzuki.

[@bigtreecombatacademy2927]

Same

[@robbyclark6915]

Honestly, I would rarely ride the bike hard enough to warrant hand guards or a skid plate and could care less if the windshield is adjustable. I really like that the Honda is 40+ lbs lighter than the Suzuki. I really like that. But in the end, an adv bike really should have all those things (and a quick shifter?) and 507lbs ain’t bad at all. But the kicker is that I just can’t stand the looks of the Honda! I gotta go with the V-Strom all the way!

[@Big1_]

The Honda headlights are like a scooter headlights. Suzuki looks more agressive. Honda front looks like a lady with make up.

[@aGentleUser]

I Like the Look of the Suzuki more and it might be the more complete package. But Numbers are one, the feel of riding might be still better with the honda. They were always exceptionally light to handle.

[@ResQ166]

waiting for tenere 9 with 19"17" and 120 hp

[@kumonojuuza]

Mee too

[@helinho]

Para quando yamaha

[@SWTrailsAndWheels]

50lbs is a heck of a handicap for the Suzuki.

[@jaywhoisit4863]

I’m not so sure. My bike is 235kg and I don’t have any issues. If your gonna ride enduro then don’t buy either of these bikes! These bikes are both designed for adventure touring, not climbing mountains on goat trails! 20 extra kg isn’t gonna make a difference on a dirt road!

[@halfaloafajudo9194]

This is my take, neither bike is set-up for serious off road though the Suzuki does appear to have thought about it more. So realistically the level of off road most buyers will be doing is kinda negligible to compare these differences but if you're a big strong guy I'd say the Suzuki might be more capable. On the actual roads and highway I'd prefer to be on the Honda, the power to weight ratio is quite good and it looks sleek in that dark grey!

[@jonwoodworker]

My picture is just one of my Honda's. However, your wrong about "on road".. With more torque, counter balanced engine, 50lbs more, better (adjustable) suspension, larger fuel capacity and better stock wind screen, the PStrom will be better on road. The downfall of the Honda will be the suspension. They should have come out of the box with a suspension that would solidify its superiority over the T7 and PStrom. Right now, it's just, which brand do you like better.

[@MrRodwatson]

@@jonwoodworker You got my thumbs up just for your suspension points. Quality Suspension seems to be a thing that's "ok" to skimp on, on modern Japanese bikes....🙄 PS...I ride a 2017 AT.......GIVE ME OPTIONS HONDA!!!!

[@adamnagel7436]

@@jonwoodworker i love how people have made up their minds before anyone even rides the bikes. KZbin comments at their finest.

[@dw5523]

For my money, the Suzuki is the clear winner. Better suspension, longer range, more useable power. No contest. Just looked it up, and the V also has better suspension travel than my KLR.

[@bigguyonalittleadventure5673]

The biggest problem is that the Aprilia Tuareg is only $1000 more, has the same power as these, is loaded with electronics and a wet weight of 450lb. But we’ll have to see if the Aprilia can match the reliability we’ve come to expect from the Japanese brands.

[@dw5523]

@@bigguyonalittleadventure5673 true on all points. I’m leery of Italian reliability - cars, motorcycles, suits, women, militarily 🤣. I the Suzuki looks like it would protect better in the elements with how wide it is infringed of the rider. Time will tell.

[@bigguyonalittleadventure5673]

@@dw5523 - I ride a 1st-gen WeeStrom and I love that thing. I can see myself on the new 800. Too bad it gained 30 pounds, though.

[@dw5523]

@@bigguyonalittleadventure5673 seems all the bikes are gaining weight each year - kind of like most of us 🤣

[@bigguyonalittleadventure5673]

@@dw5523 - weird how that goes, huh. The KLR is a good example. The 3rd gen that “just” came out is 100 pounds heavier than the original.

[@franciscofonseca6328]

Totally would go for Suzuki. Specially because its looks much more premium than the transalp. I think That its a shame That Honda did the transalp like and upgrade of the CB 500x

[@billyb6043]

yep...they should have done a full on XC version of the CB 500 X with more power, better suspension and bigger rims...

[@travelinben1966]

Suzuki hands down.👍🏻👍🏻👌

[@Unfunny_Username_389]

2:20 shows V-strom w/ centre stand, suggesting that's a standard fitment. Other images in this video do not. You should have mentioned that. My guess is a). neither bike has a main stand and b). a dealer fitted one would be a couple hundred $/£/E. And also add a few lbs and kg. A bike like this really should come with a centre stand. Note too that half your audience will be in metric countries so you need to convert weights and measures and stick 'em in parentheses, really. I personally think both bikes are too heavy for what they are. The V-strom (which incidentally is stupidly named now that it's not a V) at 230kg is particularly lard-assed - especially in comparison to the 650cc original of 189kg.

[@RidgeRoamer]

Thanks for watching and thanks for your input. I appreciate it as I strive to continuously make better content. I am sorry I didn't address the accessories in detail. Center stand is available as a factory option for both motorcycles. There were multiple pictures of each bike in stock form, and accessorized with bags, center stand, guards, etc. I think we now have say the V is for Vertical twin, but I get what you are saying...

[@samaxe6495]

My son and I want to follow the original path of the transcontinental RR through Utah. I’m thinking V-Strom. But at speeds approaching a crawl, I think either would more than capable.

[@tomg6284]

After thinking a bit more about the two. I would go with Suzuki because before I bought my KTM I was on a list for the CB500x 2022 model and would still be waiting. Honda has been a disappointment to me.

[@urbanadventurer5]

If I had to choose today with no ride reviews and not having the opportunity to sit on them, I go Suzuki. They are both finalists for an upgrade bike for me (along with the updated 2023 Tenere and Tuareg 660). We’ll see where I land, but I love having two more legitimate options in the mix. I also love that both the Honda and Suzuki offer OEM low seats for us shorter folks. 👍🏾

[@foundationofintegrity]

Tuareg 660 is a better bike imo

[@urbanadventurer5]

@@foundationofintegrity comparing bike features to bike features, you are probably right. When you factor in reliability, dealer network, and parts availability, we’ll have to see, but the Suzuki could end up being a better bike to own long term.

[@ricardofabia]

For motorcycles meant to go off-road, those exhausts are surprisingly low.

[@chrispiatt2235]

I'm stating the obvious, but all the data is irrelevant until these can be ridden. I don't ride motorcycles due to some abstract metric of advantage, and I suspect many others are the same. The ONLY comparison worth making at this point is looks (since these are so similar in spec) and the Honda (esp. in Ross White) clearly wins in that category, at least for me.

[@federicocerbonim7654]

Very well explain. Even though I'm a fan and ex owner of both brands (2017 Africa Twin 1000 and 2015 VStrom 1000) I go with Suzuki. What you can not change is the essence of the bike (engine, chassis, Specs, etc.) the DE is way ahead, the rest is paraphernalia. I'll go with the "TwinStrom"...

[@MotoVania]

Love how all the Honda advantages are “if you’re into that”. These bikes are pretty dang close, with the gives and takes being pretty equivalent. I would love either. And as for standard vs options, without pricing announced, hard to tell if that’s an advantage

[@RidgeRoamer]

Thanks for watching. In my defense, I said that only ONE time, related to phone integration, which I personally can't stand. I ride to get away, and I have no desire to see anything from my phone on my motorcycle screen.

[@MichaelCoolGuy86]

You know whats funny? It doesn't matter which is better. If dealers can't keep them stocked, it'll go to whomever has inventory, not spec sheets.

[@DerAusreiter]

Team Suzuki ❤

[@MacAlex007]

Suzuki might be better if you do more off-road, but still... the weight hurts and you can't expect a better response at lower revs just because it has a bit more torque. Gear ratios might make all the diference. I think Honda made the Transalp for people that do more road and just a small amount of off-road. Lower suspension and weight and more power. Also, usefull phone connectivity for the daily home/work rides. Maybe they'll do a rally version later for more off-road ability, and to face the Tenere.

[@atomictim6422]

plus lack of suspension adjustability on the H is just about a deal killer

[@MacAlex007]

@@atomictim6422 I think it comes with preload adjustment. Rear and front. 🙄

[@moorepower13]

Honda learned from Suzuki that you don't need a ton of suspension travel to be successful. Suzuki has learned to add more suspension to be successful. Weight on larger bikes don't stop them off road so don't worry about the difference of a few pounds. Torque wins the day in motor performance of this category. Larger throttle bodies on the Suzuki should let the aftermarket unleash a bit more power as well.

[@welditmick]

50 pounds difference is not 'just a few'. Also, the power curves are important, but these are not shown, just peak figures. Suzuki really should have changed the name for it, as it is not 'V' anymore.

[@Ijusthopeitsquick]

@@welditmick Agreed, they should have called it the P-Strom, after all it's a parallel twin and it's the colour of pee.

[@moorepower13]

@@welditmick let the shoot outs begin!

[@jokermtb]

Suzuki’s twin cam and dual axis counterbalanced, bolt on subframe, adjustable windshield, heavier duty adjustable suspension, quikshift, and the Suzuki is just physically larger than the Honda, etc, all add weight (just think of all the extra bolts, frame tabs, etc), which is why the Honda is lighter.

[@RidgeRoamer]

Definitely! Thanks!

[@edgarheinrichs8876]

@@RidgeRoamer I really wanted the suzuki but the weight is a very big factor off road. I have a 2014 v-strom 1000 and I cannot pick it up where I could with my v-strom 650. The Honda is lighter than the v-strom 650. I may have to get one of those strap jack contraptions to assist in picking up a bike because I ride alone and into some muddy no where trails.

[@chrisdodson9972]

Test rode both bikes back to back, within 30 minutes of each other. I thought the Suzuki gives the more superior ride. Smoother engine, comfier seat and riding position and the quickshifter works extremely well. The transalp goes well enough but felt poorer quality and really vibey. I bought the Suzuki.

[@kpap65]

@Ridge Roamer. That's an excellent comparison. Well done! In my book the V-Strom has a better suspension and the Transalp is lighter. Thats the bottom line for me. On paper of course since we 'll have to wait to see how both the suspensions work in the real world and how is the center of gravity placed on both bikes. Still full suspension adjustabillity on the V-Strom and less weight on the Transalp are objective. Also from specs only, the Transalp has higher power output but we'll have to see real world usable power in both engines since they are both new designs. What's a deal breaker for me it's not the lack of cruise control on both bikes but the tubed tires. These are not hard core off-road bikes and touring (or adventure touring) bikes should have tubeless wheels in my opinion. But in this category only the Aprilia Tuareg has got that right (plus the cruise control if you think that's important). I'm guessing that sooner than later both companies will present versions with the more standard 19"-17" tubeless wheels as it's almost impossible to address this issue with aftermarket solutions.

[@SebastianD1977]

I would take Africa twin 1100 at 6kg heavier than Suzuki 230kg any day

[@MagicAyrtonforever]

After being badly treated by Honda (corrosion issues on a well maintained 2 year old Africa twin bike that they will not fix) I am going to buy a 23 Suzuki subject to a test ride and quality control check ..

[@robertobruselas3952]

Really interesting comparison. Definitely pro Suzuki now! 👍🏾

[@HuBo485]

I’m an Africa Twin owner so Honda is my first choice but what I don’t like on the Transalp is the low exhaust position, nothing over the display to fix the Garmin, not adjustable fork! And headlights! This boring 500X headlights design! So a lot to improve with after sales products…

[@winstonwolff]

The Honda looks way better but the Suzuki looks like it's a better off roader. Will have to ride both before I buy. Likely buying one of them.

[@RRRRefuelRideRace]

Great comparison. Suzuki had to do something new and they just did. :)

[@tomtricker2509]

You forgot about an important parameter: the difference in the diameter of the rear wheels: Transalp - 18 inches, V-Strom - 17. Unfortunately, both tubular rims, which are slightly different from the current standards, see Guzzi, BMW, Aprilia ...

[@MrBenHaynes]

Guzzi learnt from their mistake of initially releasing the V85TT with tube type rims. They have now seen the light. I would buy neither of this pair.

[@tomg6284]

The winner is, the motorcycle that has cruse control. Looks like Aprilia wins ok KTM or BMW.

[@dustinanderson4809]

Should be able to pick up an aftermarket option fairly quickly if they don't offer it as an option.

[@RidgeRoamer]

Yeah, my Triumph Tiger 900 weighs about the same as the Transalp, but comes with all the extras like cruise control, heated grips, heated seats, handguards, skid plate, and more power. But cost on the Tiger is also significantly more. Hard to say if that's a fair comparison, and same goes for the Aprillia, KTM, and BMW.

[@Geshmaal]

If we land with the Honda being a cheaper bike that's better on-road and the Suzuki more expensive and better off-road that seems about right. If the Suzuki ends up cheaper then they're onto a big winner.

[@SupercovenGW2]

Suzuki for me.

[@andyw237]

The one with the biggest fuel tank and best range gets my money.

[@DashRendar308]

That Plastic Skid plate and those cheap plastic "handguards" probably dont add much to the Suzukis weight and even if you add some quality parts to the Honda it will still weigh considerably less.

[@fransvoorham]

For me the Suzuki 😊

[@martinbueno5911]

It depends on the use that is given to it, if one is not going to enter the field, only the engine is already much superior in the sling to travel

[@yodapig]

The V-strom is only 'better' if you're playing a game of top-trumps, and even then there are only a few mm difference in most cases... Like most things, the real choice is likely to come down to price and availability.

[@C_R_O_M________]

The RM400 doesn't have anything to do with V-Strom's styling. The latter definitely alludes to the legendary DR BIG.

[@icedidi]

Love the way you brush aside the phone connectivity

[@RidgeRoamer]

I think it's dumb. If you like it, that's fine. I like to get away when I ride. Last thing I want is distraction of text alerts while I'm ripping through technical Mountain passes.

[@allwheeldrive]

What?! Again no cruise control?! I just don't get it. They both promise the ability to really crack off the miles. And most of us have to get to the good roads FIRST before we can maximize the fun factor. CC is a must on ANY adventure or touring-oriented bike. They do look great, though! Can't wait to see a comparison in this category.

[@sumo_steve45]

Now THAT is a great video!!!! Give us the facts and let us decide. If you ask me - the P-Strom wins. lol Seriously though, the Suzuki gets the nod from me ( all things considered ).

[@darkiee69]

The DR seems more like a T7 competitor than the Honda that's more of a tourer that can do gravel and light off road. Just look at where they placed the exhaust.

[@suj3919]

VSTROM WINS

[@ralphcantrell3214]

Nice! But my long ago paid-for, properly maintained, fully loaded 2013 Adventure model with only 20,000 miles on the clock is looking better and better. At this time I wouldn't trade that fantastic old 90 degree V-twin for any parallel engine. It's the finest, most dependable 70+ horsepower in motorcycle-dom.

[@gislisigurdsson1092]

The V Strom DE all the way for me

[@da72ma]

I am a Honda fan, but Suzuki knocked it out of the park... clear winner .. we will wait for the rumble on and off road with the Yamaha Tenere 700...

[@tritiumglo4699]

abs, ride modes , traction control. Keep them both.

[@nickbenfell4327]

Suzuki. My 650 Vstrom was terrific.

[@jaegermeister1968]

sure both good bikes but I would buy the Tenere700 in this class.

[@kumonojuuza]

I do

[@thomasmcsherry6122]

Suzuki 🎉

[@BerDekMoncton]

Love my Transalp, the engine is something special. The local Suzuki dealer didn’t have any in stock for me to compare.

[@martymiller4300]

Nobody else seems to be bothered by the ridiculously vulnerable protrusion hanging under the new Honda twin’s oil pan. What is that? Additional oil cooling area? A cheap alternative to an internal windage tray? Bad enough on a street application (Hornet) it’s inconceivable that the TransAlp offers a bash guard only as an extra cost option. My Yamaha XSR700 already has kicked up a piece of loose asphalt and holed the (flat) oil pan. Not a great expense but you better have quick access to a recovery trailer and a week to wait for parts. Bad engineering that’s visible even in the publicity photos.

[@kuhndj67]

V-Strom is over the "pig limit" of 500lbs...which means it's basically a pavement bike. The Transalp isn't much better at 460... but it IS better. Over 500lbs makes the Strom a heavyweight ADV bike not a middleweight... it weighs more than my 1200cc Multistrada (which has double the hp) and about the same as an R1200GS (~125hp).

[@MotoMechzorz]

Thats what i was thinking. Im already leaning towards ktm or tenere over africa twin due to the weight.

[@wolfganghenzinger4713]

Had a test ride on both yesterday, Transalp was the surprising winner. Liked the engine and suspension better. Looks is better on vstrom

[@bonedale]

Why is small seat height a winner?

[@Jabsy101]

Because it’s far safer regardless of a riders experience. Extremely tall bikes, especially off-roaders, will always pose a risk of falling over due to uneven terrain while off-road. Even tall riders drop tall bikes at standstill due to loose ground or slippery conditions. The more firmly planted your feet are at a standstill, the better your chances of not tipping over. A soft tip over on flat ground is one thing, a tip over into a ditch or cliff side is an entirely different situation.

[@jaywhoisit4863]

I have a 36 inch inseam. I’ve never sat on a bike I can’t flatfoot. Low seats suck!!

[@RidgeRoamer]

That's a nice problem to have when shopping for an ADV bike, but you are definitely in the minority. I have a 30 inch inseam...

[@jaywhoisit4863]

@@RidgeRoamer try buying jeans in Kenya with a 36 inch leg!!! While it’s a blessing for riding and running, it certainly sucks buying blue jeans!!😂

[@bonedale]

My point is, a short bike is not a winning feature, a bike that has seat, peg and bar adjustability/options would be.

[@geekstar2937]

Strom certainly looks better, but TransAlp is much lighter. Aprilia Tuareg 660 seems to be the overall best bike in this segment imo

[@buzzinadventures4217]

Yeah if yo don't care about lack of world wide dealer network and reliability issues.

[@geekstar2937]

@@buzzinadventures4217 Good point with the dealer network, but as far as I can tell there are no known reliability issues with the Tuareg 660, except the bolt in gear lever breaking occassionally when the bike falls.

[@afandou1966]

Honda guy here,but I think the Suzuki is a better choice between the two I would've seriously considered it if it had cruise control and air conditioning, sorry, meant to say tubeless rims. Thinking about sourcing them from after market.

[@mindspinn311]

You didn’t mention the Honda has an 18 inch rear wheel while the Suzuki retains the 17 inch. That will be a deciding factor for many buyers who want more off road capability and tire choices.

[@tomonabudget]

Compare the weights of both bikes with similar levels of protection. Also: how high os that weight? Almost every single reviewer talk about the weight, but not its distribution. That's where Honda had a great potential in their NC750 and lost all of that when they made the Transalp. Both bikes would be too top heavy for my use.

[@N-SOJU]

Mmm tuff one , think will comes down to individual styling preferences..

[@tomcooney183]

Vstrom styling is obviously DR BIG 750/800 inspired, where did you come up with the pe250 comparison?

[@steppy7048]

Suzuki should only give the design of their bikes to a good italian , if they will release a more touring version with 19+17" wheels I guess it would have a good success. Transalp .... looks like a good industrial product but in Italy we would say : I'd get an Africa Twin but I can't afford it , the poor brother ...

[@pateris]

As long as I've ridden none of those, I rest my case, but the Honda wins by a nose so far because of the weight issue.

[@davidnobular9220]

Oh no !! No cruise control !! How can I operate the capuccino machine when I'm holding the throttle ???