The West Sends Tanks to Ukraine | PKA

[@PKAClips]

SUPPORT PKA! • PATREON: www.Patreon.com/PKA • PKA PODCAST CLIPS: kzbin.info • PKA 632 PODCAST CLIPS: kzbin.info/aero/PL3TI5YrC9y_1RqhWQorK2lnXXQpkl8N3 • FULL PKA 632 PODCAST: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eJ3CpHaBbJeeaM0 • Best of 2022 | PKA Podcast Year in Review ►► kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXu0c2ZqoadksJI

[@avodacado]

Woody saying he knows nothing, then proceeds to try explain everything.

[@georgehorobin438]

He’s a clown

[@dogguy8603]

While being wrong

[@StubbsMillingCo.]

@@dogguy8603 thank you! Lol both of you! He “watches it everyday” if he did, actually watch he would understand it’s a proxy war that the US is making sure they have the authority and logistics to move military equipment globally to compete with China. It has some to do with Russia of course but it’s about China. Woodsy has no intel and has no data to provide any kind of ground for this topic. Lend Lease Act? USD crashing and needing a saving grace while China owns cripto while it’s all illegal besides mining it there?? Iran-Contra and arms deals?? Biden and German Military advisor both come on tv and say “Putin needs to be removed from power?? Libya? Iraq? Afghan? YEMEN?? Come on Woody!!!!! No intel! Stfu!!!! 😂

[@p1xelshooter287]

😂

[@ryanthomas9633]

He’s one of those people who talks a lot about things he knows nothing about

[@Mr.Ambrose_Dyer_Armitage_Esq.]

I'm reminded of a Winston Churchill quote (paraphrased): _"Russia is never as strong as she wants to be seen as but, she's also never as a weak as you assume she is."_

[@MrMr-ws3tv]

It takes them a while to get thing's together and they have no shortage of bored alcoholic soldiers .

[@RCXDerp]

@@MrMr-ws3tv Do they have enough men to survive precision bombs though we shall see.

[@Mr.Ambrose_Dyer_Armitage_Esq.]

@@MrMr-ws3tv But once they get going...

[@vesstig]

@@Mr.Ambrose_Dyer_Armitage_Esq. The west seems to forget who made it to Berlin first

[@Mr.Ambrose_Dyer_Armitage_Esq.]

@@vesstig Western democracies have a bad habit of electing their leaders given popularity contests among some of the most lazy, decadent peoples in the world; they're only as wise as their electorates...

[@geekspeak1066]

Technically JP-8 is jet fuel but the entire military runs on it. From Humvee’s to jets.

[@rollastudent]

Jet fuel just sounds fancy, it’s just extra clean diesel.

[@kyledodson2992]

Helios run on JP5 but yeah all our MRAPs and MATVs ran JP8

[@scantrontheimmortal]

The thing is since The Tanks being sent use Multi Fuel Engines the Ukrainians can run them on Diesel like they use for their current soviet style tanks.

[@That0Homeless0Guy]

Don't US tanks literally use jet engines?

[@rollastudent]

@@That0Homeless0Guy depends on how literally you mean literally

[@nickpeloquin5594]

4:55 woody is wrong, the tanks would be best used in winter and summer, not spring. Eastern Europe is notoriously muddy during spring and fall, they call it the rasputitsa and was a huge thorn in the side of German invasion plans during the second World War as well as soviet plans when moving west

[@Bug0xF4]

When is woody ever not wrong?

[@GroovySauce]

Kyle's dog is adorable

[@podfuk]

lol I tought its a cat

[@tongpoo8985]

I wish theyd get rid of drifters face cam and replace with Kyle's dog cam

[@cameronash5492]

31 Abrams is a battalion plus the 60 Bradleys and 90 Strykers being sent it's about a mechanized brigade worth of vehicles.

[@dean6708]

My dad drove the M1A1 in 1984 when it first came out he was stationed at fort Knox, dad said you felt like God when you drove that thing. He said mud would f*** it up though sometimes.

[@nfaisnfgay]

I live less than 20 minutes from there!

[@ion5822]

Problem is Ukraine battlefield is all mud, tho it would be effective in winter

[@Salty_Balls]

No iteration of the M1 ever had a diesel. They've always been turbine. From day one, it was one of the reasons ithe Chrysler design was chosen over the General Motors prototype, which had a diesel. Also, the M1A1 didn't come into existence until 1986. Everything built from 1979 to 1985 was just a standard, OG design, M1. You didn't pay close enough attention to what your dad was telling you.

[@_Drewski2]

I wonder if woody reads the comments. Every video he’s getting shit on 😂😂😂

[@poorindiansanddogsarenotal1276]

All 4 of them look boring unlikable cringe tbh. I tried do hard to keep with them but they're just meh

[@braxtonvestal777]

The one thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.

[@TerexJ]

I love how little these guys know about everything.

[@aontaithe-]

i just wanted cheaper groceries

[@mr.niceguy3583]

Don’t you just love it when your own countries government cares more about oversea countries than their own citizens?

[@daylonhucks5592]

Exactly. I really love paying high gas prices, driving on crap roads, and paying $9 for eggs

[@mercydsmoke]

Then you shouldn’t of voted for Biden lmfao

[@mr.niceguy3583]

@@mercydsmoke no one voted for Biden

[@niemand2485]

@@mercydsmoke speak for yourself cuck

[@cartho1103]

It's gonna be so interesting to see Abrams fighting against modern tanks. I definitely wanna hear if the Ukrainians prefer Russian, German, or US tanks

[@oceanwavesandcocaine1129]

Could never get enough of war talk

[@captzoom1778]

The thing is the Abrams tank you can change the whole power plant in it in like an hour and a half

[@leflavius_nl5370]

MTU's EuroPowerPack (and the KA501 it stems from) in the Leopards, Leclercs and a handful of K2s too. Basically everyone's tanks except for the Russian (maybe Chinese too, not sure) have reasonably quickswappable powerpacks.

[@spingebill8551]

The Abrams could run on pretty much any fuel. Also woody is wrong, artillery is also offensive. There’s a reason Ukrainians like the HIMARS so much, its super good at wiping out distant targets in Russian occupied territory, while itself being kilometres behind the front line.

[@Hoozpoppin]

Ukraine have wanted leopard 2 tanks since the invasion. That’s because they’re cheap to repair, easy to maintain and easy to train troops to use. Abrahams aren’t, as are the challenger tanks; of which the latter still have obsolete guns due an upgrade this year.

[@edwardhewer8530]

LOL, obsolete guns. Will it split open a T72 at 3kms away? Yes, yes it will. Is the armour a lot better than a Leopard 2, yes it is. Each tank brings something to the table. Ukraine has proved it will extract the maximum from the weapons provided.

[@gastronauta4362]

Those ghosts deamons broke his back.

[@usmcjawbreaker97]

Woody is very right, when the Marine Corps shut down its tanks they send almost all the guys to aviation or artillery. The Abrams engine is literally a jet engine.

[@KKzullu]

Ukraine started with 800 over tanks, they are making a big thing about sending 60 tanks over the next 4 months to a year, these tanks are expensive to maintain and they are being drip fed into the country, ukraine doesn't have the time and will just use anything they get to defend bahkmut, also woody doesn't realize that these "useless small parts gains" is packed with tons of units like in bahkmut where tehre's an estimate of 14 battle groups over there getting shelled day and night

[@TheImmoralNosferatuZodd]

17:44 Dark's got some dope channels. I recommend them.

[@thatandrew808]

Imagine a gas engine sputtering out it just coasts to a stop. Imagine something with a turbine engine if it dies you fall out the sky. I was in the army but not a tanker but I imagine they just remove it and send it to be rebuilt. I imagine that will be in Poland. Also I think I remember that they chose the turbine engine cause it can basically run on anything. People say (JP8) jet fuel as if it’s this ultra propellant. It’s everywhere in the military it’s so volatile they let PV2s slosh it all over the generators as they fill them. Woody always does that preface I’m not an expert but… so when he inevitably wrong he can say I said I wasn’t an expert.

[@georgehorobin438]

Challenger 2 British tanks undefeated

[@se7enspac3s]

I have a landraider crusader I'm not using. Spose I could send that.

[@scope402]

I was under the impression that abrams could run on multiple types of fuels not just jet fuel

[@hunterharrison5074]

It can run on almost any fuel just at a lower efficiency. Woody just doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

[@johnnytower6169]

Loads of equipment uses gas turbines. They aren’t hard to work on with basic training. It’s knowing what to do that’s the trick. They’ll need specialists trained for diagnostics and the knowledge of required maintenance and the issues involved

[@douggaudiosi14]

I didnt think it was possible to hate someone more then woody. Impressive driftor

[@jimbo5494]

Without infantry a tank will get clapped so quick

[@TheSteelKlown]

Man the insurance rate is going to skyrocket on those tanks lmao

[@HappyG1lm0re]

Anyone else notice how Woody snores between each breath?

[@chipsthedog1]

Kyle would love Mr Ballens video The worst military blunder in history, it's a crazy story that is about a Russian navy fleet that is so wild its hard to believe it is true

[@saab9251]

If you want a more in depth story in that fleet, look up the video from Drachinifel. It’s titled the Russian 2nd Pacific Squadran. From a history perspective it’s somehow even funnier.

[@billrosenstein]

The Russo Japanese war?

[@texasforever7887]

Do you see torpedo boats? 🤣🤣🤣

[@chipsthedog1]

@@texasforever7887 I actually laughed out lous when I read that

[@ecks77]

No, tanks cannot hold cities or townships.

[@NeutralGuyDoubleZero]

I remember seeing some clown that said "Ain't now way they're ever getting our Abrams!" Lmao

[@wakandawildman2043]

I remember some clown sending out abrams lmao

[@NeutralGuyDoubleZero]

@@wakandawildman2043 That thing you're trying to do ain't workin

[@wakandawildman2043]

@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero speaking of not working how’s life going

[@MJ-iw2fx]

@@wakandawildman2043 great joke. better than ops retarded shit joke

[@tiamat_023]

I know we've got a few in this crowd who like to shit on education (Even as a concept)... one of the huge drivers behind Ukraine's ability to learn new weapon systems, integrate and execute with flawless results, is their really well educated population. Years of infighting probably helped a little with that, but you can't discount the combat multiplying effects.

[@jnes624]

challenger 2 has the best armour, the abrams has something similar, its called chobham armour (or a variation of it)

[@Superkwaji]

DU armor is the best

[@simonphoenix5768]

here for woodys awful takes lol

[@WillyNelson-r2g]

Woody you don’t know shut

[@WillyNelson-r2g]

Woody is UNBEARABLE

[@ruby4268]

Stop blinking, its the only thing i can focus on.

[@MrMr-ws3tv]

Apparently the tank's need to be built first. They really want to drag this war out

[@cheeseninja1115]

That's only the US Abrams though. It more has to do with political maneuvering by the US to have Germany pick up the slack in giving more aid. By having Abrams arrive later than Leopards, it means Germany and Poland becomes the main supplier of tanks to Ukraine, meaning the US doesn't need to send as much aid as they would have if the main force of Ukrainian armor was made up of American Abrams

[@rayquaza1245]

@@cheeseninja1115 It's more just the US giving Germany assurance that they are in it with them long term.

[@williampoole1742]

Hey, every month is another $50 or $100 billion in these people's pockets, nevermind the young men being blown to bits.

[@spingebill8551]

Didn’t the marines just retire all of their Abrams? Even if that weren’t true, I don’t think you understand how many spare tanks the US has in storage.

[@skylla7452]

@@spingebill8551 we don’t have any export models to give them

[@Scottdude814]

First to send tanks to Ukraine.

[@csbauder]

8:34 We signed this whole... uh... TREE-EE

[@earthwormjim6962]

30 tanks are not going to make a dent in that war.

[@ganjahiwalker2641]

Turbines aren’t that complicated wood

[@crakkbone]

Ghadafi wanted to switch oil over to the gold standard essentially. Gold for oil. He also wanted to create an African Union, and to free Africans of modern slavery. Read his book.

[@lp9280]

2:42 - this was myth to delay delivery... T80 tank as well has turbine engine, in fact they are same generation of the tank basically and T80 was made in response to M1 Abrams. So this "jet" or "non-jet" really means nothing. Ukrainians can maintain T80s, they can maintain M1 Abrams too. Sure they need parts, they need like repair manuals, but is not like some sort of magical thing. As well I think what many people get wrong... they think Ukrainians are some sort of farmers going into war. No... Ukraine had biggest army in Europe before the war... poor army but it wasn't small. Not as big as ruzzian, but it is not some tiny country with tiny army. Ukrainians were prime contractors for ruzzian jet upgrade packages imagine F16 upgraders where US had all those different versions, a, b, c to whatever f or h now. Basically taking gen 4 fighter into gen 4.5. Well that is what Ukraine does to Mig 29s (an equivalent to F16), they are country to do to. They build their own tactical ballistic missiles, their own anti ship missiles, they are actually leaders in jet and turbo-prop engine design and manufacturing. Part of the reason why Byaraktar TB2 were supplied to Ukraine is that Ukraine supplies turkey with the engines for those drones. ruzzia itself was maintaining most of it's helicopter engines in Ukraine until 2014. Same for tanks - Ukraine upgrades old T62s (they call them T64s) and T80s (T84s) and they do everything, ERA, they even have developed APS for them. Sure they don't have scale, but at the same time they were like 7th biggest arm exporter in the world. Not 1st like US, not 2nd like ruzzia, but they were in top 10. So can they maintain Abrams - yes of course they can. People just assume that Ukraine is some sort third war country like Afghanistan where they live in stone age. Iraq had M1 Abrams and Iraq is way less capable of maintaining them than Ukraine. So this was invented just as an excuse. That said it is not true that M1 Abrams was tank "mean to fight ruzzians in eastern Europe". Leopard 1 and 2 - yes, but not M1. M1 Abrams was primarily meant to be used in deserts and where the soils is hard, nor rivers not mud. Now can they fight ruzzians in Europe - yes absolutely they can, but they are not the best tank for the task. There is one simple reason for that - M1 Abrams are too heavy for most of the bridges in Eastern Europe (by design of the bridges, because soviets deliberately made them too weak, so that their tanks can cross, but American ones can't), same applies to Challenger 2. And this kind of creates an issue - they have to stay on the roads, they can't wade the rivers, they would get stuck in the muddy fields. Leopard on other hand is ideal for this role. That said why Poland buys M1s then? kind of simple reason - they equip their guard army with them, they would be amazing on defensive and I think Ukraine will use them the same - keep them around Kyiv just in case of another attempt from ruzzia and that allows them to free-up other tanks for frontline.

[@denism8494]

Germany were the ones to first confirm they will send leopards, then the US followed with abrams

[@denism8494]

also that map displayed on screen is outdated, the northern front does not exist anymore, the ukranians pushed them to the belarus border

[@jnes624]

brits before that?

[@rayquaza1245]

Brits were the first to confirm they'd send western tanks. It's likely Germany and the US made some sort of agreement to send tanks at the same time, not one resulting in the other.

[@petsmith7772]

Germany was FORCED to send tanks by Biden.

[@denism8494]

@@petsmith7772 lol that senile old man couldn't force his toilet seat up

[@TemplarX2]

1 heavy tank can turn the tide if employed at a crucial weak point. Believe it or not. It create a gap from which lighter vehicles can pour in to assault the logistical tail. I think the AMX 10rc will surprise many.

[@06Crf250rider]

I feel like I get recommended and watch a lot of the same stuff Kyle talks about lol.

[@GenericProtagonist7]

I really want to see the statistics for the rates of suicide among people looking into alternative fuel sources compared to the average population.

[@justinantonius2823]

here in hawaii we see anti missile tests all the time.

[@tribbergrips1613]

Our tank doesn't just run on jetfuel, they also run on diesel

[@dean6708]

Anything that holds a flame can be poured into the tank of the Abrams M1A2 and that turbine engine will run

[@dean6708]

It's wonderful for wartime use because if gasoline or any kind of fuel shortage then you can just find lamp oil or anything and slap that s*** up in there

[@That0Homeless0Guy]

Jet fuel is just highly refined Kerosene, Kerosene is a primary diesel fuel refined off before the diesel that you find at civilian pumps. Also a lot of comercial diesel is loaded with kerosene.

[@earthwormjim6962]

No, a tank can't hold a town, my guy. A tank without support and infrastructure is a sitting duck. Also, yeah, sure, let's TRY AND SEE IF RUSSIA's nuclear arsenal is weak. That's great thinking, guys!

[@lp9280]

4:57 - my assumption is that the number announced does not matter. Point is - ruzzia not going to shit themselves and nuke the world over 31 tanks... that would be silly. But as soon as there is 1 we can send literally unlimited number of them, because who is going to tell when the original 31 get's destroyed? Like unless somebody pictures somehow all the tanks in one spot and it turns out to be 300, then it may be questionable, but I am sure they will drip feed the numbers... "maybe another 15, and 10 and 6 etc." and when somebody says where those 100 tanks came from the answer will be... well we delivered few here and few there. Basically nobody will ever be able to account for all the tanks and US has like 3000 in reserve. Secondly, I think 31 tanks were more of the token gesture to sort of imply the contribution for others, especially those delivering Leopards... I think it is US way of saying "30+ would be welcome contribution"... and there are few dozen countries with Leopards, so if each does the same thing, then there could be 300-600 tanks coming. And yes indeed whatever 60 tanks were pledged is a joke. Ukraine has already destroyed like 1500 ruzzian ones... as a matter of fact ruzzia lost more thanks than UK, France, Germany and Italy has combined. I reckon Ukrainians operate ~1000 tanks fleet, ruzzia has about the same left + slowly pulling trash like T62s back from boneyards. So yes 60 tanks is drop in the ocean, but I believe these are just "trainers", Ukraine needs some to get their troops trained before using more of them in the battle. I am confident that Abrams, Leopards and Challengers will remain in some bases near Kyiv and we won't see them on the battlefield this summer. For one as trainers and secondly as last resort battalion. Because there was all that talk about ruzzians going for Kyiv again - I reckon even 60 modern tanks and 200 modern IFVs like Bradleys could provide decent defensive force on the main defensive axis. ruzzians failed to crack some volunteers with javelins last time, so I reckon they stand no chance against well equipped batalion.

[@wendigoactual8325]

A tank is terrobpe to occupy a town the buildings let infantry get close and they will take out a tank. A tank can hold overwatch over a town and dominate though

[@Tunkkis]

That's what combined arms is for.

[@wendigoactual8325]

@@Tunkkis Ukraine doesn't have the extended capability without us intervention to maintain combined warefare, loitering aircraft like helicopters are out of the question because of how much AA there is. Airplanes are limited due to most of ukraines airports and bases being destroyed

[@Fractured_Unity]

@@wendigoactual8325 Luckily drones are sophisticated enough to replace the niche of helicopters. In some ways, even better suited because of how hard they are to detect.

[@mr.nemesis6442]

Tanks are only good for conventional wars which is exactly what Ukraine is fighting right now. Western tanks have better fire control systems and can target russian tanks out to 5km (about 3 miles). The Abrams’s capabilities were proven during 73 Easting and that was the M1A1 version. We’re sending Ukraine something closer to the M1A2 SEPv2 that we sell to the export market.

[@wendigoactual8325]

@@mr.nemesis6442 i know nato tanks are superior and the abrams is king. I'm saying you don't use a tank to occupy a town. You use a large force to occupy and have armor for support.

[@Trash-can999]

What was that air quote?

[@TemplarX2]

Kyle is such a war nerd. Such a broski.

[@MarkSmithhhh]

We found out real fast modern day russia is not the soviet union

[@PJDelsandro]

With no facts at all I think we think of tank warfare wrong in this theater I think it's more of heavy defense quick setup pillbox direct fire howitzer type of thing think it's trench warfare instead of moving a gun with no defense very exposed to mortars and uav that has to be taken down then set up then built up just move from a dug out spot to dug out spot the whole game of tanks in a stagnant fight is hid the hull and angle armor

[@opraiderman904]

Drift0r saw Fury

[@billrosenstein]

Watch some of Col. Douglas Macgregor's commentary for a sobering insight of the Ukrainian proxy war.

[@andrescubillo7824]

Erbody talnbout Germany and Jap-an. But imagine a motivated Poland

[@Nuck-Fo0bZz]

Am I high, or is Drift0r always laying down in these videos?? Also, how we aren't considered in a full blown war with Russia is beyond me. Also, I have a Pomeranian too. Love the little guy.

[@denism8494]

We shipped weapons into afghanistan in the 80s with no full blown war, it's the same tactic, pump up Russias enemy with support to weaken them by proxy. Nothing new and it's not as likely to lead to full blown war as you might think.

[@rayquaza1245]

Because we're clearly not in a full blown war with Russia, even if we are "at war" on some level. How could we be considered in a full blown war with Russia if the two militaries aren't engaging each other in combat? It's like in WW2 when we supported the allies before getting directly involved against Germany. I guess we were "at war" with Germany, but there is a clear difference between that and the war against Germany from 42-45.

[@chadking8767]

@@rayquaza1245 what about driftor tho, and what are your opinions about pomeranians?!?!?!

[@billrosenstein]

@@chadking8767 he's bedridden from Kyle stealing his testosterone

[@texasforever7887]

Because it is a proxy war. The Soviets did it to us in Korea and Vietnam. We returned the favor to the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 80s and we are doing it again to Russia.

[@machstem6390]

Man its always woody...

[@673AWSF]

It’s very unlikely there’s a missile shield around the United States.

[@Dante.-]

Doubtful, you really think the government would assume Russia doesn’t have one? Or that North Korea or any other rogue nation can be trusted not to fire their arsenal?

[@673AWSF]

@@Dante.- remember 911 when some subhumans cave dwellers supposedly flew four planes into buildings and a field? Where was it then?

[@Dante.-]

@@673AWSF I think this comment really proves your intelligence level Those planes were already being tracked on flight radars, the issue simply was, we did not know which one was hijacked. That’s why all planes were told to land, so that the ones that refused would be immediately outed as the hijacked airplane

[@673AWSF]

@@Dante.- they’ve been saying that for 20 fucking years and even in 7th grade I didn’t believe them. It’s Friday night, Datelines on. Go watch it. Sounds like your kind of tv program.

[@Dante.-]

@@673AWSF lol you don’t have any facts to back your schizophrenia

[@libertas_americana]

I did not know that the Ukraine is the 51st state.

[@hmoneygetter2029]

Based driftor

[@mohnish7653]

it is so unprofessional to stream from bed ,like have some respect for the viewers man , how would you like if i called video called from the toilet ?

[@2112-j9j]

Driftor is packing on tbe pounds big time

[@doolarena]

Woody looking old

[@bless7213]

Credit to woody. For not knowing much, and admitting how much he doesn’t know, but still being pretty much correct.

[@RasseAkaGod]

Thing sweden gonna send some jas gripen jets

[@MilliPSN]

So many ads on these vids GODDAMN

[@edwardshepherd8074]

2:26 Nope, runs on diesel.

[@tonyfriendly4409]

I thought about this. My first thought is that Russia likely only has ~50 nukes they can hit us with. My second thought is, that's 50 half-mile craters that used to be city centers.

[@joshfranklin1894]

For an authentic fake Russian Kyle's Russian accent sucked,.... gotta work on that to reprise his role as FPS Russia

[@williammcclenahan3614]

Honestly I could be wrong but I think this is just Russia first plan the 2nd is gonna be worst and if I'm wrong Russia is doing a shit job Ukraine is one of the weekest but there really showing tht they areint

[@braxtonvestal777]

Zelenksy literally had a speech to the west saying how good this conflict is for the economy.

[@billrosenstein]

Well, certain sectors of it sure.

[@wordupninja]

Correction-The west says that they plan to build tanks for Ukraine and that they may get them “in about a year”

[@clayjack9969]

US government moment.

[@denism8494]

this isn't true, there are already 2k leopard tanks in europe, there is no need to build new ones to ship when they got plenty of stock sitting around

[@clayjack9969]

@@denism8494 yeah seriously, let’s just bring out everything we have fuck it. I’m not joking here we should go all out why not?

[@denism8494]

@@clayjack9969 I am not suggesting they send all 2k, that would be foolish as they also need to keep stock in case Ukraine loses, and Russia decides to continue past Ukraine. I am simply saying there is no need to build new ones to ship directly to Ukraine, they can send a portion of what they have and replenish their own with the new builds.

[@WoodyVuko]

German here: That’s not true. We’re gonna train the Ukrainians and send them leopards around end of march. Poland f.e. is already sending tanks

[@easy94883]

Ah YES 50 NATO tanks will surely help Ukraine win. SURELY

[@user-pr9qb6yi9w]

well no shit it will.

[@easy94883]

@@user-pr9qb6yi9w lol are you brain dead?

[@BillCipher1337]

Spain alone confirmed to send 54 Leo 2

[@Dushmann_]

1 NATO tank is worth 10 Russian tanks

[@spingebill8551]

I mean older versions of the current NATO tanks and Bradley’s wiped out thousands of older versions of the Soviet tanks with barely any losses in Iraq. So yeah.

[@jaquesmoon]

Slava ukraina

[@jayr7890]

Shut up

[@Shokan-mm8sj]

Z

[@SuperTyrannical1]

Challenger 2 > M1 Abrahms. Undefeated apart from a blue on blue. It takes a challenger 2 to kill a challenger 2. 😉

[@Superkwaji]

Because they've never had to face a us abrahms tank?

[@BillCipher1337]

Leo 2 has the best protected turret of them all.

[@isleofthecheetah]

Now lets see what happens if the Challenger 2 ammo is struck..... All ammo on the M1 Abrams is in blow out panel storage. CR2 not so much...

[@earthwormjim6962]

The West did not send tanks to Ukraine. Abrams is a year away at best. Leopards will may be be sent in Spring, but I doubt. Also, even if they do send tanks, this is useless. Tanks do not win battles, especially in small amounts.

[@billrosenstein]

The US is looking like they're getting ready to wrap up their failed proxy war. Get ready for the anti Chinese hysteria. That's the big one they're preparing for.

[@earthwormjim6962]

@@billrosenstein I think it already started. What's with the balloon and all.

[@S.Matt240]

These tanks will not affect the battlefield at all. And they don't wanna advance in spring when the ground thaws

[@c0llision945]

really? damn, ok well thanks for the info, I'll pass the word on to Biden and let him know a millitary expert in the youtube comments says the tanks won't do anything.

[@dixen9116]

MR PRESIDENT, WE'VE JUST RECEIVED INTEL FROM MATT S. ON KZbin.

[@easy94883]

@@c0llision945 He's right though, 50 tanks aint gonna do anything. UK already said that Ukraine shouldn't use the 12 tanks they're sending in the front line because they're scared of Russians capturing them and just finding out how it's built.

[@newzinski6946]

@@easy94883 Russia doesn't have the parts to even produce their own right now lol. Western tanks have more tech and conductors which Russia has no supply of right now. They' wouldn't be able to produce any for the next 10 years based on their economy

[@harley4230]

@@newzinski6946 > Russia doesn't have the parts to even produce their own right now lol. Western tanks have more tech and conductors which Russia has no supply of right now. That is what the Western propaganda is saying, yes.

[@Fuffzich21]

As a German living in Germany I can tell you I’m not happy with the decision making of our hillbilly Chancellor Olaf Scholz. in contrast to you US folks we Germans (or any EU country) doesn’t have such a fancy contract with Ukraine about weapon support and who is going to pay for it. 😡

[@petsmith7772]

You better get ready for war fought on German turf.

[@Fuffzich21]

@@petsmith7772 nope! I’ll just do it like the majority of the Ukrainians and escape to another western country

[@donaldhysa4836]

@@Fuffzich21 You will run out of Western countries to escape to if you dont fight

[@Fuffzich21]

@@donaldhysa4836 who said that would be my direction?? Don’t worry about other people’s dishes 😉

[@donaldhysa4836]

@@Fuffzich21 You said that would be your direction.

[@vesstig]

The west seems to forget who made it to Berlin first and created a counter nuke system called Perimeter

[@art0694]

What is the point of this guy Drift0r?

[@NickSmokes]

why tf does the driftor guy lay on a pillow during the podcast? makes the whole thing have a awkward feel

[@messagefamilystyled1101]

He’s getting a perpetual happy ending from a Chinese masseur

[@jayr7890]

Honestly hope ukraine loses lmao

[@Bdhshxhhcjsjsyhxnskfkfbzbbahxu]

Who’s the bum laying in bed and constantly getting everything wrong