This New Twitter Artist Was Called Out For Using AI Art...

[@LoverinaPlays]

I can understand how annoying it is if you’re an artist and people say your art is AI. But i hate when people bring that up when the artist is ACTUALLY using ai.

[@simonebernacchia5724]

Am somehow an artist but AI seem a powerful tool to use when things get complex, so i cannot stand ABSOLUTE positions all good/all bad

[@AuroraPaintBrush4444]

​@@simonebernacchia5724 AI still is unethical 1) How the programers train/harvest/Steal the data to get the data banks 2) the absurd amount of energy needed to run it. If you could train an AI program to harvest only your own artwork, or pay the artist/photographers/writers/etc a royalty, it would be slightly different, but , as it is right now, its still scummy

[@IAmSchwi]

Yeah I didn't notice it at first, but it's definitely ai upon closer inspection

[@y_yk_0]

i hate this spike in use of AI image generator so much because it forced artist to be wary of "each other" or else you'd risk defending an enemy

[@firelordoregano5632]

@@simonebernacchia5724 ai is actually really bad at complex things, because it doesn't actually know the logic and physics of how things like shadows and folds form, just follows the patterns of the images it's trained on. meaning fine details get muddy or completely lost.

[@erikachoi9520]

5:22 I know she said it in the vid, but DEFINITELY take ai image detector results with a grain of salt. I’ve put a piece I drew in one of them for fun that I spent weeks working on, only for it to say it was 100% AI generated. I think due to a stamp brush I used.

[@ChocolateShaddixX]

I once drew some shitty vent art, literally not a masterpiece in any way and the detector said it's 90% AI. People need to stay away from the detectors, they're not advanced enough and could harm some real artists.

[@BoldActionSkitty]

Yeah, it sucks. I'm worried my works will get mistaken for being AI when they aren't.

[@Maddie_mumbo]

i took my art (50 sub special) and it thought it was ai even tho it was clearly real :( , all the ai detetctor are crap

[@LeonmitchelliGalette]

Ah~ I can put 100% AI genarated image in such "detector" and it spit out "clean!"

[@Xia_melon]

@@LeonmitchelliGalette😂

[@Kori888_cc]

I feel so bad that it’s come to this when we can’t tell anymore, AI art is used for nothing but scamming, like why do we need ai speed paints unless it’s to trick someone that it’s NOT ai? This is so unfair….

[@ickicki]

I don’t know why people hide AI or try to defend themselves by lying. There is a whole AI-Bro community online that simps over AI images. I feel it’s pretty adjacent to the crypto-bro community. If you’re going to spend money on generators instead of on a pack colored pencils, at least have the decency to stick with that community. I just don’t understand the point of lying and trying to infiltrate artists/commissioner spaces and knowingly mislead people. The use of AI art is already questionable (theft, environmental impact, arguably soulless, uncreative, sloppy landfill fodder) , but it takes a horribly nefarious person to intentionally deceive paying customers.

[@Skyefrost.]

it's because they know it won't make money haha. You'll find ai bros telling artists their art isn't worth shit, but they are also upset they can't sell their art. Like seriously if i want an ai art piece i can get it for free or for cheap in exactly the way i want. Why would i pay an ai bro? (see that one dude being mad that he couldn't sell his ai art piece that won in a state art fair) "They are steallllling from me!!!!" Ai bros are not going to buy from other ai bros lmaoo they will just steal the idea from each other and prompt it

[@Mareterra76]

They are afraid of the anti ai art Gestapo.

[@Blaze6108]

@@Mareterra76 Literally all you'd need to do to solve this is be transparent about how you're creating your content, people who like AI would follow you and people who don't would just skip you and you'd never hear from them again. There's no 'anti-AI', there's just people who want to know WTF they're looking at so they can make informed decisions on who to follow or what to consume. IMO it's very telling that so much AI content creation seems to be predicated on lying about how it's made or being hilariously opaque about it. There's a reason actual artists openly use descriptions like 'oil on canvas'.

[@Leyawa]

the jump from the "sketch" to the clear lines is WYLD :D

[@oof7711]

She might’ve gotten away with it if she didn’t post that 😂😂

[@Biggiecheese20]

All of the "AI artists" always do that without fail when someone asks for a process lol

[@Ros13_Pos13]

In clip to do that they would have to stop the piece, export the piece, pause the recording (which deletes the previous Speedpaint, hence the export) then you have to restart the Speedpaint recording and continue the painting. That's definitely intentional and definitely ai

[@raincandy1653]

That's because it's an AI generated speed art

[@getsmoked5263]

16:02 the other foot being a different color isn’t uncommon lots of artists change the color of things that are in the background to show that it’s further away you’ll see a lot of artists use purple and blue for that (Some of y’all don’t understand what I’m saying😭 I’m saying in general not this picture specifically)

[@ahsaym4161]

very true!

[@kazkaz991]

I was just about to say this! it makes the lighting look better and creates a distance illusion

[@yamiunabun]

Yup! But sorry if I'm just looking very hard but the way that the tights go from brown to a sage green colour wouldn't be correct for how the shoe and fluffy are shaded in. It would be a more lighter purply brown

[@tsukisyndrome]

I was about to point that out! It's very important to not make misinformation about these kind of painting choices or real artist will have another witch hunt... :')

[@getsmoked5263]

@@tsukisyndrome yeah that’s why I said it cuz a lot of ppl don’t understand that this can hurt artists

[@M1lkySoy]

Hello, I'm the other person who pointed out all the AI aspects on the first drawing. I followed everything I learned from your videos on how to recognize AI

[@fosilizd9513]

Yo! Commenting to boost this- you explained everything very well, I could actually understand it- I often don't, even being an artist. Good evaluation, keep up the good work!!

[@Justyourordinaryperson1]

Good work! It was very understandable thanks for pointing it all out!

[@LeviAckerman-cv8hi]

did you check wau recent art video speedpaint post showing the hints "ai" you say start to finish, i want to know what you think about that

[@memyselfandyoutube4839]

@@LeviAckerman-cv8hi i was about to come at you, yeah her recent post does show a speedpaint a new art with the same art styles and "mistake" they said there was. now i feel bad for the actual artist

[@LeviAckerman-cv8hi]

@@memyselfandyoutube4839 lol I like doing my own investigation and looking both sides instead of listening to one person and just attacking the individual, its not a mistake now we are coming at each other. ofc AI is stupid and awful but all the evidence they brought out is the same thing most other artist do, this is just mean and down putting now we all have to be perfect, is the excuse now she learnt overnight, she overlay the ai and colored because clipstudio doesn't allow that. i would like to hear

[@sunla]

I love color jitter, but it makes me angry that AI is emulating that.

[@SmartBatto]

What I find suspicious is the constant blinking of the sketch layer. Every art program should have a layer opacity function... so why the constant blinking like your hiding the sketch so you can see something under it? Edit: On top of that... it's the sketch layer, what do you need to see, under the sketch layer, that you also need to hide?

[@miles4939]

i haven't actually finished the video yet, i'm guessing this person did use ai but i just wanted to say that for me personally, i often turn the sketch layer on and off while drawing lineart so i can see how it's looking - like, turn the sketch on to trace the lines, then turn it off so i can make sure the lines are looking good on their own before continuing to draw them

[@firelordoregano5632]

@@miles4939 that's normal, i think they're saying this person was turning it on and off not while doing lineart, but while actually drawing the sketch layer itself, with "nothing" underneath.

[@skelebrosgaming2187]

Every other comment under this video has me worried that I'm gonna get accused of AI art. I do the same process with layers with my digital pieces

[@raincandy1653]

Probably because it's an AI generated speed paint

[@TrapezeMagician]

Using AI for what she says is a commission (the elf girl) is scummy af. That person should demand a refund.

[@Namae69]

I follow her profile for some time and watch quietly, here's my speculation: she is heavely referencing and overpainting AI but doesn't lack skill. Feels like she isn't satisfied with her current skills and helps herself with AI :/ She posted a new timelapse video and... this drawing doesn't contain any mistakes she made in the past? Things I noticed in her previous drawings (among many others) are: merging elements, repetative elements that change between each other in this wonky AI way, AI melting, difference in skills, basically everything that was pointed out in the video AND more. Most of these problems magically disappear in the video, where she needs to redraw the whole piece herself. But then, it feels like she copies stuff from genAI images without thinking twice - the difference in skills between elements is so weird. I believe AI stuggled with creating these and she had to actually render it without a help of the image. I think I wouldn't think twice about it and actually believed her after this new timelapse, but this one drawing with girl in latex is so SO clearly AI, I won't believe she didn't use help of AI in other pieces. The fishnet on her chest is sich a big giveaway- why is each square colored differently like a mosaic LOL That's what old/weak AI models would do.

[@rainofstars5809]

yeah u right. fishnet is a failure. I studied her art close up and it is, as always, a blurry ai. However, how she did the speedpainting... most likely there is an erasure of layers behind which there is a layer with an ai. The last art also contains typical ai errors

[@Namae69]

​@@rainofstars5809​this account is already dead with 0 activity on it. Can't believe they spent money on twitter premium and abandoned it because people found out it's all AI lmao

[@SWAGGY_MCSWAGSWAG]

But if they have the skill to overtrace it this well, they have the skill to notice and fix ai's mistakes? Like why wouldnt they notice all the weird blobs when tracing? It would be easy to erase them. She wouldnt copy all these mistakes

[@Namae69]

@@SWAGGY_MCSWAGSWAG I think her drawings with no timelapses (or full timelapses) are overpaintings with her own fixes, so that's why all these artefacts are left as she only changes this and that. And her full lenght timelapse is either traced with an invisible layer or she'd stop recording from time to time to trace over and remove the AI layer, which is totally possible in CSP. I don't think she doesn't see them tbf? I believe it's the case of "I don't think anyone else would notice" lmao. Though those are just speculations and my insights.

[@40Ccents]

the fishnet has varying levels of thickness with some parts are so thin they can just be multiple lines and other parts having bold strokes which is mighty suspicious of ai

[@al3x___189]

8:57 i don't work in stages either, I usually js do that to avoid burnout or to see how it'll look with colours layered onto it. But, idk why they even posted the 'speedpaint' when it proves nothing because the AI accusations mostly came from the rendering part😶

[@dibel3669]

More than likely they copied off of an Ai piece they generated.

[@sagetusk]

aye, there's a lot of that at the moment

[@bluscout1857]

Yeah I think they used AI and then used that image as a basis for their artwork

[@SWAGGY_MCSWAGSWAG]

But if they have the skill to copy it this well, they have the skill to notice and fix ai's mistakes? Like why wouldnt they notice all the weird blobs when tracing? It would be easy to erase them.

[@Runzi333]

I think the color differences shouldn't be used as evidence on its own of ai use cause hue shifts are very normal if you're digitally painting and this is on purpose to make things look more lifelike. I was literally taught to add greens and blues etc in places that are not exactly expected because thats how humans actually see real life hue shifts arent ai its just very VERY common in like corporate professional work (triple a game concept art etc.). Also if you use mixing brushes and color picking its super common to have similar but not the same colors. That being said the anatomy and inconsistent details on the hands and hair seem super ai to me though

[@Runzi333]

I think if you're doing that level of work in rendering and not doing the same level of detail even on the same hand in a peice but the speedpaint can absolutely be generated cause we've seen that too.

[@dibel3669]

That would not apply to this scenario

[@potatocat2445]

this, also when you edit your art work with the rgb levels for a more unified pallet(? This can cause a lot of different hues. Although the colors on the nails in that purple hair girl was a bit odd.

[@splitintwo_5432]

Actually, quick clarification on Clip Studio's Speedpaint functionality! You can indeed start midway through a drawing, I had to do so when I was saving my files as PSD files sometimes. When you save a file as a PSD in Clip Studio and close the file you'll lose the speedpaint that you had going. So when I remembered, I would start the speedpaint and either never close the program, or export what I had and then start the speedpaint up again the next time I opened the file. However, you do have to manually start recording each and every time you open that file up again, and so if you forget, like I often did.. many incomplete speedpaints, lol. Not defending this particular artist, as it really looks like AI, just wanted to explain the speedpaint function in Clip Studio a little more.

[@teojoon]

yep its manual, for me its still confusing because u have to manually start and stop the speedpaint for it not to record like that

[@NevirSurrender]

I feel like ai image detectors are super wrong most of the time solely because it seems to detect based on art that people feed the machines rather than ai generated images itself. Definitely not a reliable source just like a polygraph test

[@Teenagerka]

Saw the hair strand randomly morphing into a weird scissors/needle thingy on the nurse art and that was enough proof for me

[@_isFtAway]

eyes are a dead give away tbh

[@Namae69]

She posted a new timelapse where you can see she is actually painting eyes like that, which is wild. Makes me believe she is heavely referencing AI to the point, she doesn't see how weird some elements are. No sane person would draw eyes like this LOL Also, eyes from the new timelapse are way more consistent than anything she drew before, even though they still look wobbly

[@pom_mu]

Nah as an artist I can tell it's possible for this not to be AI art and I hate these guilty before proven innocent accs. I don't agree with most of this video, self taught artists will make certain mistakes. AI has to learn from something and these "mistakes"(patterns) that AI makes are common in other peoples works before AI existed. There's no such thing as AI dead giveaways unless you find something like jpg artifacts on png images.

[@Namae69]

​@@pom_mu I literally cannot find any explanation for things like, let's say, elements melting into each other. This zipper in one drawing is such a nonsense there's no human explanation for this tbf. My artstyle is also pretty melty and soft on edges, especially around hair, but I just don't understand how a stripe can change into a zipper with some weird, heart-like shaped charm, then this zipper merges weirdly into nothingness and becomes a crotch seam. What is happening there lol I know it's mistakes human can make, but it gets weird when someone makes all of them + has this AI "stink" to it + magically stops making these mistakes when posting a timelapse. It's just so weird man. And I am confident in it because I was very interested in AI before it really blew up, thought it was a cool contept that might've helped artists so I put lots of time generating random shit for fun and learning this "tool of future". Then AI quickly became a curse, but I can still pin point stuff that AI would generate for me and drive me crazy by how useless it was lol. This person had lots of "wips" and other speedpaints too but she deleted them all. Only found one post talking about it, as someone downloaded one of the "step by step" pictures. Just makes me wonder why tbh? I had lots of faith in her because this account was proposed to me by twitter in its early styages, so it's weird to see it all disappearing lol

[@solanaceous]

4 fingers in that one art was also a dead giveaway lol also, ai can speed paint very well. theres thousands upon millions of hours of speed paints on yt that AI can learn off of. so seeing speed painting as concrete proof is pretty much gone now

[@pom_mu]

@@Namae69 I won't die on my hill and you make a convincing argument so I guess so without looking into it myself I can only take your word. I got emotional thinking how going after this one person can lead to going after other artists in the future. It's easy to pile on someone and ruin their livelihood.

[@AshcookiesVA]

I hate how good artists are getting flamed over people saying “oh, it’s AI art” I hate it!

[@cocopan4848]

1:30 Just for this part it's not necessarily AI (I like drawing my hair that way too sometimes, especially while doing semi-rendered sketches) but the other weird lines are definitely AI tell-tale signs

[@AnaosPoffu]

man its crazy how many people defend ai i like to draw swoopy hair but if its clearly ai im not gonna defend it because "oh i do that too!" like yeah i might do that, but theres a billion other things in the image that proves its not made by hand lol

[@NekkidZombieDude]

Very blatant AI Tracing if you ask me. The linework is really insecure and wobbly so is all of the rendering in a way that doesn't track with the needed skill level for these poses and compositions, I think they did it by hand and just aren't a skilled enough artist to notice/fix all of the inconsistencies and weird shapes the AI Generator conjures up and just tries to copy it blindly 🤷‍♂

[@FurinatheArtist]

i think they paint over some parts instead of tracing

[@NekkidZombieDude]

@@FurinatheArtist Yeah looking at some of these I can see that too, it's mostly the first one that looks Severely Traced to me

[@DrinksCocoa]

15:44 This one is not exactly an error, some of the artists like to colour parts of the body lighter when they're further

[@dibel3669]

Or it can also be Ai discoloration. Happens at lot!

[@musicxnr8876]

its not done in the right way in this case because it would have a transition with the other black color thing on the same leg. i believe this is done because of the atmosphere coloration or ambient which can color and lighten the parts further from the camare but it will lighten everything not only that (and progressively)

[@Karma20XX]

There's also brushes for clothing details like buttons, trim, eyelets, etc.

[@wendychouxx]

For the hands in the time lapse it’s okay for me cause we don’t always have to redraw the hands, like yes they are hard to draw but it happens to draw correctly hands on the first try, and for the colours well I don’t see any problem cause I also sometimes (a lot of times) start to put the colours even if my line art is not finished But anyway that person definitely knows how to draw i think there is AI in the process some have more AI in it than the others

[@Vampire_Slayer28]

The speed paint looked like it had a white flair at the end, ibis paint has that for their speed paints - they cant hide layers but you can trace over the reference window. Maybe they did that?

[@Allyfyn]

You can't trace over the reference window though

[@Vampire_Slayer28]

@Allyfyn you can, i found out on accident that if you start outside the window you just go over it - size the window up to fully cover the canvas and start the lineton the outside it keeps going. Definitely not made to be traced over but it's possible

[@ersilart]

Сейчас слишком много людей стало "художниками" :( Буквально каждый десятый автор "резко научился рисовать"

[@bwunxii]

AAH tysm! I was waiting for you to go over this!

[@floradorbs]

this is happening way too often now 😭

[@Num1coinpinshipper]

FR..

[@dorestheo5314]

I don't consider stuff generated by AI as an art, so can we stop calling it "AI art" and just use word "AI graphics" instead?

[@sailormars3890]

Forgetting to do certain things in an art piece can happen but not as often in a singular piece

[@hanakoDograu]

HOW DID KZbin HIDE THIS FROM ME FOR 23 MINUTES?

[@crossanddream2]

These videos make me realize how my style sometimes mimic AI, i sometimes do things like ai (thin hair strands thicking, hair sticking out and coming back, not continuing details and missing lines), and i have never used ai or even referenced from ai. It's just how I draw and it's just my art style

[@OnigoroshiZero]

Well, I hate to break it to you, but you are an AI based on her analysis...

[@gusherxcrusher]

Ngl i do the same thing with hair 😭

[@cheekyy]

if someone suspects its ai just show ur timelapses or what not. people in these videos usually have multiple red flags with little to no complete proof of artwork like stated at end of video

[@ninabeansofficial]

Thats not the ONLY reason she gave though.

[@_Leah_h]

I have seen so many artist do those kind of stuff. I think that even I did those a few times. Sometimes it's stylistics choice or because it looks cool.. And hey, if the strand curls to the side view, it will look thin and when it rotates or smth, it would look thicker all of a sudden. Sometimes she exaggerates some stuff even if they're for AI art, but a lot of normal artists do those as well. And then you see real artists being accused of AI bcs 'this is something that AI does!'

[@lemmeknow9584]

eyes are so obviously ai cmon ppl 😭 i was required to use ai for my job and these are the most ai eyes i’ve seen, anime eyes alwaysss get generated messy af like that

[@lemmeknow9584]

the birds on their bikini piece are DIABOLICAL

[@cyybermoonz]

also the ai piece of the girl on the beach has a huge mistake in her shirt. her right hand has the sleeve rolled down, but her left hand doesnt have one at all, but the back of the shirt looks like she has both sleeves on!

[@Nanbread-bw7nq]

she mentioned that in the video I think

[@keeganzzpike]

16:06 these two shoes are also rendered in two different styles. if you look closely the closer shoe is shaded normally and kind of has a realistic render style but the farther one looks like theres some kind of blue like reflecting off of it and has a more cartoony render style

[@tezooka310]

16:37 dawg wtf is that nurse holding 💀💀💀 looks like something an AI thinks humans use for medical procedures

[@Doggo_LoverM]

Also she’s holding it so weird as if she’s holding a ball or smt 😭

[@Kila_draws]

I don't get why people pretend like they can draw...Why don't you just learn how that's what I'm doing.

[@WedgyBlue]

I just remember that AI can make speedpaints.

[@pillaridha]

The safest way no make art nowaday is by live streaming the entire process to provide an "Evidence" its not AI. This is the problem with AI, it makes everyone amogus Yeah after you breakdown, i 100% convinced that this "artist" is AI prompter.

[@crow-like-the-cheese1283]

DAMN IM EARLY!! love ur content, its really thorough and easy to follow along with if im not watching the video!

[@CossyDraws]

I do sketch and then just paint. Then go and add the line art. Or define the lines of my sketch.

[@wrexgrafix84]

Yup, as an artist, it looks suspiciously like AI generated.

[@fangslore9988]

those art pieces are 100% AI, i've tinkered around with AI myself to learn the tell tale signs of AI and these scream AI

[@MLGDuckk]

Don’t understand the “melting” part, that’s just a rendering style

[@warriorsfamily5339]

fr

[@sunflower7874]

@@warriorsfamily5339 no it's not, her hand literally disappears off screen and stretches a little

[@Cosmic_Commentary]

You can toggle the speed paint on and off during the making. I looked it up and if you toggle it off during a piece it'll still save what you recorded before you turned off. It's like when you pause a recording on OBS, continue gaming, and then unpause it in a different place. So the artist could've turned it on in the beginning, then off to trace, then back on. Or they recorded the entire time but edited out the parts showing they traced the AI art. Also, the bottons... CSP has tools to make shapes like circles... and then you can edit said circle by using the perspective tool...

[@yarhena_14]

I absolutely love your vids! Your vids inspire me to push forward and not let AI get in the way through my art journey. Thank u so Katliente.😍🥰🤩

[@jenakin_skywalker]

Im really enjoying these videos. High octane investigating. LOVE IT

[@Bloomkyaaa]

This generic shiny pretty anime style is so overdone to the point it's called AI no matter who does it... AI can replicate speedpaints now too so... Anyways, if you don't want to be accused of AI be sure to fully record your process.

[@sunflower7874]

did you watch her video? she went over how it's ai art. and when she was going over an actual anime artist, you can tell that they actually drew it in anime style and didn't use ai.

[@Jays.cck.washer]

Ai can replicate speedpaints as good as those Chuck E. Cheese drawing photo booths

[@monkeywrench-c6y]

10:38 if you look where the second ear is you can see it starts to become one with the hair at the bottom of it to the point I think even a beginner wouldn't do

[@gigakaya626]

just noticed u reached 100k CONGRATS 💞❤️

[@ReaIKinich]

Yep. Sticking to traditional~

[@igenuine_artz]

I think the only thing AI is good at is making the art piece look good from far away.

[@VioletteRin]

I have been staying early on your videos omg

[@stingyfloopy]

Dude same 😅

[@DekoraRui]

AI can be fun to mess with but I don't like it when people train their ai with artists artworks without permission. I mean atleast ask for or pay for it. And if you used AI for something in a drawing it's better to say it first rather than just not saying anything.

[@DollyAnna]

5:33 - I just wanted to comment on the thing about polygraph tests, since this is a very common misconception - When done correctly (and I say this because a lot of the "polygraph tests" you see online, like done on celebs and stuff, are not done correctly and not following the correct standard of procedure for the test to not give false positives, so they're inaccurate and invalid) Polygraph tests are very accurate. They work in a very specific way, and need to be done this way in order to be valid and accurate. How they work is like this: the person being questioned is hooked up to several different sensors. Typically, in a valid test, this will include a pad that you sit on which tracks clenching movements, sensors hooked up to your fingers to track sweating and heart rate, sensors attached to your chest to track breathing, and sensors attached to your arm to track blood pressure. These are the usual ones they use. Then, a qualified polygraph examiner is supposed to tell the person they are testing every single question they plan to ask. Not necessarily in the order they will ask them, but they have to tell them. Once they start the polygraph machine, each of these sensors has their own individual line on the machine. This is to prevent it from being rigged (for example, if someone tries to induce a false positive by clenching, the only line that will go up is the pad they're sitting on and the examiner will be able to see that they're doing that.) These lines also create a "standard", in the sense that if someone is nervous, their heart rate will be higher. Some medications also cause higher blood pressure, etc. This is different for each person, and just having a high heart rate due to nerves will not cause a qualified examiner to consider this a false positive. The line will just sit higher on the graph from the beginning than for someone who isn't nervous, right. What then happens is the test will begin. The polygraph examiner asks the questions they said they would ask. Not necessarily in the order they said them before, but still only those questions. They aren't allowed to ask questions they didn't state at the beginning. These questions are also ONLY allowed to be yes or no questions. If you see a video where they ask open questions, the test is immediately invalid. Then they check the graph for spikes from ALL sensors when the person responds yes or no to a question. Every single line would need to spike to indicate the person is lying - that's how the body works. Your breathing, sweating, heartrate, blood pressure, and bootay clenching all go up when you're lying, it's basic biology. The examiner will also ask the same questions multiple times in different orders to make sure they get a spike consistently on the answer of that specific question. They mark their graph every time they get a spike, and they keep record of which questions got the spike. Very often these sessions are recorded, too, if it's in like a police/law setting etc. So it's never a case of "oh I'm nervous, I'm gonna look guilty" lol. That's not how it works, and if anybody ever claims that their test is valid but they don't follow this exact procedure, know that it is not and it won't hold up in court. I know all of this because my dad is a qualified polygraph examiner and he hooked me and my sister up to the test once to show us exactly how it works and why certain tests you see online are invalid and inaccurate. If done properly, they are extremely accurate. Just like stay safe and make sure the test is done correctly, if you ever need to go for one for work or anything like that.

[@paininthebox1291]

Ayyyy another within 4 minutesssss :D

[@ukuotuscoffinowl]

Clothing details make no sense either and fishnet is definetelly AI, no human can mess up clothing that badly. There's so much wrong and in odd places in it that it hurts my profession as it would be impossible to even design, yet to sew clothing that wonky. They might try to paint over AI bu they don't know what parts to fix to begin with with or just use Ai directly without even bothering to fix it or referencing from it. There also were some inconsistancy on anatomy as other leg being way thicker than other on that swimsuit one. And that nurse one, no collar turns outside in. It might have been a curtain to that her hand blends into. In some illustrator's styles some stuff that has very little value to viever they are left unfinised as nobody is looking them that long to notice. Thing iwith them is that they are still detailed enough to figure out what they are supposed to be. When Ai does it, it's just andom mess.

[@niyx5937]

My theory is that they started out acually drawing and then werent seeing the progress they wanted so they started using/painting over AI

[@Robonator14]

The problem with speed-paint videos is that there are AI models now that generate a video with the picture. The video is generally incomplete or skipping big changes though. You really can't trust anything anymore as these generators become better and better. Sometimes you really need to go into the pixels to tell, because then it becomes blatantly obvious that no brush was used for this... and then you start finding those people who draw over AI art to fix its mistakes and make it look more legit.

[@LeviAckerman-cv8hi]

look at her new post from start to finish her speedpaint

[@IceyWolftb]

@@LeviAckerman-cv8hiit still have skips/cuts in between. If the artist wanted to show a full speed paint. It would be start to finish not cuts in between.

[@SparklyBird]

As someone who enjoys exploring generative AI for fun, I can confirm that this artist likely uses AI. The quickest way to identify AI-generated art is by examining key details such as eyebrows, eyes, shadows, and hands. For less experienced AI users, hands often appear messy or unnatural. Additionally, inconsistencies in small details, like hair mentioned, can be a giveaway. A skilled artist who is capable of rendering at this level would typically include intricate details, particularly in the eyes and eyebrows. However, many of this artist's works exhibit odd or low-quality features. At 6:20, it seems the tool they used might be Paints-Undo. Paints-Undo is an AI tool that tries to copy how people draw digitally. Basically you give it an image and it can do things like sketching, adding colors, and shading to make digital art look more naturally made.

[@MoistNasa]

How do you always post while I’m binging your videos?

[@Lain_connected173]

early!!! i love your vids i hope you become even more popular than now! ❤❤

[@stingyfloopy]

Wow I’m early. I love your vids I appreciate you always trying to keep a neutral opinion on everything! I don’t like AI like anyone either but I appreciate you taking time and care when it comes to accusing since it can really ruin someone’s life to be wrongfully accused. Appreciate the delicacy

[@lydialynnekoltai6660]

7:14 no one’s gonna mention the eyes completely rendered but no color or render anywhere else?

[@GoobieStar]

Something I've noticed is in ai art, the characters just look soulless

[@CosmicAri_Star]

6:56 I know this isn’t about the vid but I use clip studio and you can use the 3d models like I do (keep in mind I’m a kid and still working on shading and prorations) but if they were using any art program they would’ve had a sketch for the eyes and hands

[@KitchenShovel]

Thirty mins ago!! Also my yt gives me one of your vids at the top of the page every time I open the app

[@miiinim]

generally i believe this is ai but w/ skill BUT LISTENING TO THESE RED FLAGS MAKE ME FEEL KIND OF SCARED WHAT IF I GET FLAGGED AS AN AI USER 😭🙏 SOMETIMES I FINISH MY LINE ART BC IM GONNA PAINT IT IN

[@rover8646]

KZbin how dare you keep this interesting video away from me for 36 MINUTES?!

[@0-Enzo-0]

I’m not surprised by the art drama in Twitter at this point..

[@ryuiinz]

I WAS JUST STALKING UR ACC AAAHH

[@Cheap_Snacks]

Agreed.. the intentional choice of adding the light bouncing from the ambient surroundings which technically most artist would not apply on a piece that has a white or solid color background because there's no environment to match it with furthermore the color used on the feet is strange but hey just my opinion in the end.

[@euleletsplay]

i do find it wierd, how they did fanart so well and like with the details like the model. like the leg thingy ruffle and everything. ( talking about the pekora fanart at 14:51 btw ) but they also could have put in an image?. Like i gotta admit, ive used ai when i didnt know it was bad yet because my drawings low key sucked and i also did this, but it never could get details right... wierd...

[@InstantH-mm4cq]

I don't trust speedpaints anymore unless the whole interface is visible or it's a livestream.

[@Y7RIx222]

At 18:25 you can also notice how the background is kinda weird and bendy looking, almost as if it is made by ai. I feel as if the artists is drawing a base or a bit and then using ai for the rest (I didn’t watch the full vid so correct me if I’m wrong :D)

[@fr4p00]

11:17 i imagine the thick strand of hair coming from a thin one its because the hair is tilted, it goes from facing the front to facing up to facing the front again, i do this too.

[@mika-qc3qq]

why did the hand have a point in the one with carrots in the braids?? like where the palm was it was pointy, as if it was some sort of metal

[@gman1515]

I dont know if you read comments or if you'll ever see this, but i have one piece of art that has been bugging me and im wondering if it could possibly be AI. Its a piece on a Magic: The Gathering card called "Rev, Tithe Extractor".

[@alexoxy5061]

I just tried the AI image detector thingy and it's flagging my drawings, that I drew from scratch on clip studio, at 81% AI generated wtf. Same with my friend's art. It's also flagging it as NSFW (it's not). We tried drawing a goddamn stick figure and it's flagging it as 78% AI

[@caglayagmurr]

19:50 i know exactly what happened there. they fixed her left hand but had no patience/skill to fix the other so they just put a "wall" to hide it XD

[@Namae69]

They posted a WIP of this image (now deleted) with a hand visible, but it was VERY poorly drawn and out of place. Struggle was real so wall got used LMAO😭

[@caglayagmurr]

@@Namae69 artists avoiding hands even when fixing ai drawn hands 🤣🤣🤣

[@Lovelygacha651]

Idk or not but the artist posted a speed paint with the same style... II think it would be good to also go over that

[@raincandy1653]

Important thing to note: AI art generators can also generate speed paints now. It's been a thing for months now

[@TND12]

This reminds me of an ai “artist” that used to do timelaps of their “art” and it was soo obv its ai cuz it never shows full on drawing it was erasing some parts like it was drawn

[@39__miku__39]

i do some of these design choices that most of the ai drawings include. please tell me is doing any of these bad? im still very new to art and i dont know how to draw hair properly (⋟﹏⋞)

[@via_kole]

These are definitely ai images. I mean. If your going to use ai images and basically trace them try to at least fix the ai mistakes😂 the hair, the fingers, the odd artifacts.

[@Biggiecheese20]

There are so many artists like this on Instagram too. Their "art processes" is just sketching over AI work lol

[@thesigmaofohioalt]

I’m not entirely convinced they posted a pretty believable speedpaint recently

[@HeartsForD0w0]

12:48 HELP-I THOUGHT THE MOUNTAIN WAS A TSUNAMI

[@eq_001]

the art side of twitter is slowly becoming an ai garbage dump

[@zombiJellyfish]

i agree with everything but the circles just ccuz your good at art doesn't mean you can draw a circle that is WHOLE separate skill there's a reason there is a challenge to draw the perfect circle also not to mention some people render areas less if they are not the main focus (buttons and holes are not the main focus) i still think they are using ai but i wanted to point this out

[@raymartramos8818]

if you are an artist one look is enough for it to know its ai all of ai art rn have the same vibes to it

[@owinlaa]

Fr, sometimes I don't know what exactly is giving me AI vibes but I can still immediately tell that it's AI 😭

[@igorhonamifan]

OMG FUNFACT , I JUST GOT A AI ADD

[@FurinatheArtist]

WAS IT TALKIE AI

[@Fried_Shrimp_Tempuraa]

@@FurinatheArtistNOO I HATE THOSE GOOFY AHH TALKIE AI ADS 😭

[@KibbyCatPlays]

I actually like to colour while sketching, not always but i often do it to test coulours and it feels calming and nice if i do feel stressed. I dont actually think its that uncommon to have a back and forth workflow, as mine is not always very linear xD Not saying this isnt AI because I honestly cant tell. I personally have made alot of these mistakes myself, but just to add to that we all have wastly diffrent ways to come to a final product which doesnt necessarily mean its AI

[@Rnua779]

10:59 what if the strands spread and draped down?

[@musicxnr8876]

Its obviously AI, no questions.

[@vxinl]

0:59 I do this... help. IM JUST TOO LAZY TO MAKE THE HAIR COME BACK OUT I SWEAR. I feel like that is going to be used against me one day 😭🙏

[@krystami5789]

AI tends to fuse tangents a lot, I always learned early on to avoid tangents as much as possible. So when AI does it so commonly, at that for different things and multiple of them Per piece is very obvious.

[@Yukinobunny]

Help you missed the melting lamp pole thingy in the background 19:56

[@alexandrab6515]

I feel like I’d be called out to use ai too, even on my traditional drawings, cuz I also do the hair thing where it starts thin and gets thicker and then just disappears in the rest of the hair, cuz I don’t really do how to make it look good otherwise and I kinda learned it like this, based on other artists I referenced it. Moreover I’m REALLY inconsistent (my adhs might be the reason) so some things look more detailed and then rlly weird cuz i forgot what I wanted to do haha. And my hands oh god… but nevertheless I’m rlly good at rendering!!! Even tho I never know what I’m doing, most of all when it comes to shadow or light, but my rendering is good tho hahaha. So idk I think in the end it’s rlly hard to tell if someone is using ai or rlly good at rendering and bad at the rest…

[@Mia-nk1kg]

If you are good at rendering but bad at realising the light source, one would be able to tell you are a beginner. Line art also matters.

[@Mia-nk1kg]

You would also have a recording of your artwork in case anyone thinks it’s Ai.